~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The man vs bear "debate" is a case study showing that women struggle with logic and are overly emotional, and thus not worth arguing with.Women are strong enough to inflict plenty of pain and damage on a man (or another woman or a child), especially if most men would not hit back. I would still contend that most men and most women would not act badly simply because they have the opportunity to do so with a decreased risk of consequences. Of course, a certain number of people would. I don’t know how we could measure this, but if a man, a woman and a bear were in the woods, I think most men would place themselves between the woman a… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/25 09:44 PM |
| 1 | The man vs bear "debate" is a case study showing that women struggle with logic and are overly emotional, and thus not worth arguing with.Women sexually assault men when the have the opportunity and know that they won’t be punished for it? What are you talking about? You said this: Many men act badly when there are no consequences. Their behavior when sacking cities during wars demonstrates this. You use the vague term “act badly” and use the sacking of cities as an example. Now you pivot to women sexually assaulting men. Women *can * sexually assault men, but it probably is less common. 70% of unilateral domestic violence is comm… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/25 08:14 PM |
| 1 | The man vs bear "debate" is a case study showing that women struggle with logic and are overly emotional, and thus not worth arguing with.Only men? Women don’t do this? Members of other demographics don’t do this? Would you answer my question about other demographics? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/25 03:32 AM |
| 1 | The man vs bear "debate" is a case study showing that women struggle with logic and are overly emotional, and thus not worth arguing with.Really?? Wow. You must have some horrible men in your life. Very few who men were properly raised and taught honor and integrity would ever consider this. Would the thought cross their mind? Who knows, maybe? Thoughts routinely come into my mind that I would never entertain nor follow through on. Would some men take advantage in this situation? Sure. Most? No way. Most humans have a conscience. Most have some kind of morality. Most have some amount of empathy. Bears have zero morals. Bears have … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/25 01:40 AM |
| 1 | The man vs bear "debate" is a case study showing that women struggle with logic and are overly emotional, and thus not worth arguing with.Assuming that being raped is worse than being eaten and killed — which can’t really be known unless someone has experienced both — the question then comes down to probability. If a woman encounters 100 men in the woods on consecutive days and then encounters 100 bears in the woods on consecutive days, how many men would be likely to harm her versus the number of bears who would be likely to harm her? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/01/25 07:56 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter