| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | This woman gets denied the ability to have full legal custody of her child on Judge Judy because fathers should NOT be considered second class parents. This is a victory for us men against this gynocentric society we live in! 😁I mean, yeah. I hold the belief that an organization who says they’re feminist but then actively doesn’t promote the interests of gender equality is hypocritical, and I don’t consider that kind of behavior to be definitionally feminist As for UNICEF, I haven’t heard about that but I’ll do some reading on it | /r/MensRights | 13/12/20 04:37 AM |
| 1 | This woman gets denied the ability to have full legal custody of her child on Judge Judy because fathers should NOT be considered second class parents. This is a victory for us men against this gynocentric society we live in! 😁I remember reading about that. I can follow your logic at the very least. Thanks for your perspective, you’ve given me some food for thought | /r/MensRights | 12/12/20 10:38 AM |
| 2 | This woman gets denied the ability to have full legal custody of her child on Judge Judy because fathers should NOT be considered second class parents. This is a victory for us men against this gynocentric society we live in! 😁We are in agreement there. Saying women shouldn’t only be taking care of kids and then saying men can’t take care of kids just because they’re men is hypocritical. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 07:30 PM |
| 2 | This woman gets denied the ability to have full legal custody of her child on Judge Judy because fathers should NOT be considered second class parents. This is a victory for us men against this gynocentric society we live in! 😁I would consider any organization not fighting for completely equal rights, including fighting against the legal presumption that shared custody is in the best interest of the kid, an organization not acting in the best interests of feminism. We don’t want anything to do with radical feminists. And I know I personally don’t want anything to do with an organization that says one thing and does the opposite. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 06:51 PM |
| 2 | This woman gets denied the ability to have full legal custody of her child on Judge Judy because fathers should NOT be considered second class parents. This is a victory for us men against this gynocentric society we live in! 😁That makes sense. I use the definition of feminism you gave to describe myself. think I’m reading a lot of frustration regarding extreme feminists, which I have as well. It frustrates me when extremists call themselves feminists because it takes away from the meaning of the word, and makes the rest of us look bad. Sexism is not just women being expected to take care of children. Sexism is also assuming that men can’t take care of children. And I wish more people who call themselves feminists sta… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 06:26 PM |
| -2 | This woman gets denied the ability to have full legal custody of her child on Judge Judy because fathers should NOT be considered second class parents. This is a victory for us men against this gynocentric society we live in! 😁Aight fam honest question If I were to tell you that feminists, TRUE feminists (not the misandrists), agree with you on this one, and that any feminist worth their salt would say that neither gender should be seen as more or less fit for parenthood, and instead that should be decided on a person-to-person basis How would you respond? This isn’t a trick question, I’m honestly curious and trying to understand people who think differently from me | /r/MensRights | 11/12/20 12:29 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter