TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

themaskedugly Archive

View 0 posts and 88 comments by themaskedugly on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Fire fighting is a 'strength necessary' role - you can not be a good fire-fighter if you are not very fit. This is not the case for the vast majority of police roles. Most police are not wrestling with suspects.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/20 01:47 PM
2

Of course you're right, but really, what did you expect? How could you really expect a community like this to not become a den of inceldom? It's similar to how any community that uses ironic-racism, inevitably attracts non-ironic racism; the actions of the two are nearly identical. I hope you'll take the lesson you've learned here, and apply it to the other communities you frequent, and the company you keep; wrt other polarising issues.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/19 05:52 PM
-1

what is this crock of shit?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/19 10:24 PM
0

Simply remove the bracketed dig, to discover the same exact argument; it would still be the case, even if we accept that a much larger proportion of rapes are false-accusations you'll see that a snuck premise is not a strong reason to discount an argument in and of itself, if the argument does not meaningfully rely on it. All of this is a red-herring; you are continuously and deliberately avoiding engaging with the core issue, to monologue your way into a victory by default you are a sophist imo
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/19 09:42 PM
1

It's interesting that rather than address my argument (why link crime and accusation punishments for just rape), you instead redirect to the much more muddy discussion of what proportion of rape is 'legitimate' in your eyes.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/19 07:51 PM
-4

Why should (the statistically tiny percentage of) false rape accusations get special privilege? No other crime links the punishment for false accusation with the punishment for conviction.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/19 04:23 PM
1

Was going well till the Randianism; kinda kills any attempt at intellectual superiority
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/19 10:16 AM
1

You can only polish a turd so much. I'll grant you that a larger proportion of men are 'too ugly for anyone', but there do exist women who basically no men want. Even you have some standards.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/19 09:51 AM
0

Yeah, I'm gonna be blunt; none of those problems are caused by gender discrimination. This paranoia you have that everyone is thinking about you constantly, it's not true, it's text-book social anxiety and teenage egoism. You'll grow out of the ego-ism, but the social anxiety probably needs a therapist.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 11:59 AM
-2

Don't go behind on your child support? This isn't alimony, support your children.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 11:54 AM
1

Why is money your first relevant factor?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 10:45 PM
1

Why is money a relevant factor?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/02/19 03:43 PM
1

You'd just find it desirable to watch a person be killed violently, in low quality?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/19 08:21 AM
1

If you had presented a logical argument, you might have a point. What you actually did was present an emotional appeal. I'd say the claim 'any argument can be picked apart' therefore 'why bother' is intellectual suicide.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 07:29 PM
-1

If your argument can't handle being picked apart, it probably isn't a very strong argument. Regardless, I'd sooner you didn't categorise me as 'someone like you', not only because it implies you have any idea at all about my ideology (besides the explicit 'doesn't think veterans should be allowed to get away with sexual assault'), but mostly because that kind of thinking ("anyone who challenges me is 'one of them', against 'us', behaves [like this] and believes [these things]") is extremely dest…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 07:00 PM
2

No, I don't agree with that statement. I think the entire premise of the idea of being 'more' British is flawed. Being british is not quantifiable; it's a binary quality. The british native has their (is British?) flag set to 1. As soon as that Cuban got their citizenship, their (is British?) flag was also set to 1. They did not become more british when they got their citizenship, they moved from being 'non-british' to being 'british'. I am not 'less' British because I prefer coffee to tea. I ju…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 06:50 PM
-1

Your argument implies that veterans have different rules for what is and is not sexual assault than do the rest of us; that a person might be justified in saying it's acceptable to force sexual contact on a person 'because I'm a veteran'. Do you think that's accurate?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 06:40 PM
1

ex-fucking-actly This is my point. You are not taking the moral high-ground; you are dropping yourself to their level. We are better than they are. We have higher standards than they do. We are British, we're not god damn savages.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 06:30 PM
1

I'm deeply saddened that you are unable even to comprehend the issue I have with you valorising your blood-lust. I see no discernible difference between your ideological blood-lust, and ISIS's; except perhaps scale and production values. I am certain that you would be one of the masked men jeering during the execution of an infidel, exactly as you would jeer this teen-agers hanging, if only you had been born in the middle-east. Neither of you have any place in any society worth protecting.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 06:15 PM
2

That analogy doesn't work, because nationality and gender are not meaningfully comparable (ignoring the obvious trans-debate baiting). You may as well say 'is a butterfly less a butterfly for being originally a caterpillar?'. She's a legal citizen, and by definition, British. There's no 'more or less' on that, being British is a binary quality; either you are or you aren't. The quality that determines this: 'Do you hold a British citizenship'. Any other quality you can come up with is either: A)…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 06:05 PM
1

No, I'll just continue to be ashamed of this vocal segment of the population you represent; and continue trying to surround myself with a better quality of people.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 05:53 PM
-1

You'd just find it desirable to watch a person be killed violently?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 05:05 PM
1

I'd like to live in a place where people are ashamed of fantasising about inflicting suffering, yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 02:50 PM
1

I don't think you have anything to contribute to the debate that I need to hear. Also a concerning attitude, but not one I wouldn't expect out of you.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 02:25 PM
-4

Would you jeer, do you think?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/19 12:09 PM
1

It is the UK, and I'm not suprised by the ruling. Your fantasising about a persons death is concerning to me, however. As a side-note, the express is not a reliable new source; and selects their stories and their word choices carefully explicitly because the anger you're feeling right now is addictive. They are purposely addicting you to vitriol so they can sell it to you in the morning.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/19 08:09 PM
1

Your opinion on the matter provides the context by which you intended the post to be interpreted (whether consciously or otherwise).
/r/MensRights19/02/19 07:46 PM
2

Any group which is about improving men's lot, will inevitably be overrun by the large number of extant men who just hate women (of which there are plainly a huge supply). The reverse, obviously, is also true (for feminist groups).
/r/MensRights19/02/19 07:14 PM
1

Are you actually reading this as 'We've started calling the mother 'parent 1' and the father as 'parent 2'' [because mothers are number 1 and fathers are number 2 as parents] Rather than the much more obvious 'we've stopped using gendered terms to describe parents and now simply number the guardians'? If it's the former, you are stretching.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 07:12 PM
1

The morality aside, a properly (medically indicated) performed circumcision will leave the frenelum intact. Source: PM me for dick pics
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:05 PM
1

Yes, I agree between those two horrific acts, the former is worse than the latter The creative pleasure you seem to take in concocting scenarios by which you would inflict suffering, if only you had the power, is objectionable to me
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/19 08:23 PM
-1

I don't agree with any of that; I think that's a worrying response
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/19 08:04 PM
-8

I think planting a device on a pregnant 19-year-old so that you can target an explosive device on her at a later date is questionable ethically, even if we ignore the high rates of collateral damage. Would you like for them to release the drone feed so you can watch?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/19 03:26 PM
5

Yes, I'd say that's accurate
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/19 03:21 PM
-1

There are lots of fucked up things in the world, you're right.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/19 01:10 PM
-2

That does make me sad, you're right. You should not choose to give up your humanity in the face of inhumanity.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/19 12:52 PM
-8

I understand your position; I'm commenting that I find it sad
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/19 06:55 PM
-6

She was 15 (presumably started younger) at the oldest and 19 is still firmly in the 'young, stubborn and short-sighted' category.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/19 06:39 PM
-14

Damn that's fucked up dude
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/19 04:20 PM
-7

I'm sad at the vitriol people have for this obviously groomed child. Not old enough to face the courts as an adult, old enough to be executed on the cross of tabloid journalism and political opportunism.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/19 04:18 PM
1

If you hate something you see than downvote it This doesn't work, and has never worked. Voting does not, and never has, led to quality content, on this sub, or any other.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/19 04:16 PM
2

I mean surely you've followed this sub long enough to realise there's a strong incel contingent here. The content does attract them
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/19 02:32 PM
7

It's worth noting that that 98% does not mean that if you have sex using a condom properly, that you have a 2% chance of getting pregnant, every time you have sex. That's how the pro-abstinence crowd present the data to mislead you into thinking condoms aren't effective. What that figure is saying, is that if you get 100 couples, who say they are exclusively using condoms as their birth control, then at the end of one year, 2 of those couples will be pregnant. This 2% figure includes people usin…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/19 02:27 PM
0

Aye, I'm just being pedantic
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:59 PM
0

The 'Stay-at-Home-Mothers deserve to be paid for their domestic-work' line is a misdirection; this is largely an issue that's raised with respect to 2 income families (the most common set-up today, what with the economy) where both partners work equivalent hours, where you would expect proportionality in domestic chores. Many two-income families still separate domestic chores disproportionately, despite the two partners working the same hours, and this disproportionately affects women due to our…
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:44 PM
-3

if she chooses to stay pregnant Modern medical science has not yet advanced to the point at which we can choose to become pregnant. Even your sperm-jacking 1 in a million still has to play the odds.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 05:38 PM
0

Nah, you're venting your inner-incel dude; you come off much worse than the girl in this picture Like leave off the last 2 lines and you have a decent post about the female privilege in gaming where you come across as sane and in the right; but as is, it reads: Her: "I want thing" You: "I want x money for thing" Her: "I usually get it for free for being female" You: "No thanks, that kind of gender discrimination is inappropriate, good bye" Her: "Good bye" You: "FUCK YOU WHORE YOU WILL NOT SPERM-…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/19 05:23 PM
1

Is there any evidence at all to support the claim 'people are at increased risk of death in a fire if their firefighter is female'? I see a lot of supposition in your post (and this thread generally), a lot of 'it makes sense' and 'it's obvious'; a lot of conjecture based in the form 'being a firefighter takes strength' and 'women have less strength than men' therefore 'women are bad firefighters'; which is not a sound argument. Yes, it would suck if a family member died because their firefighte…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/01/19 03:08 PM
3

I'd agree the term is a bit useless for large groups of people; but I disagree that it's due to any kind of partisan split. Every community has elements who base their beliefs fundamentally on the accepted wisdom of their group; they believe 'what we believe'. I absolutely think we should mock this NPC mentality, it's antithetical to free thought and truth; but I avoid the term because in practice, mocking an NPC comes across as mocking the progressive left (since it's rooted as an alt-right mem…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:54 PM
14

Originally the term referred to an American-leftist who, in a discussion, simply repeats received-wisdom rather than engages with the argument (like a video-game NPC with limited dialogue). In practice it just means 'A leftist holding progressive American-left views'. (Less commonly, it is also used by American-leftists to refer to the American-rightists who parrot received-wisdom rather than engage with arguments, which is obviously an entirely bi-partisan issue). It's an ironic term, since usi…
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:33 PM
1

Interesting conspiracy theory; normally it's the Jews that run the banks
/r/MensRights21/01/19 06:31 PM
2

We're talking about 'Less sexually active over all'. That's the quote you questioned. You're moving the goal-post to 'amount of partners' because it's the only way to interpret the data that supports your pre-held belief. You're taking your hypothesis and finding the data that supports it. It is the case, that while single people tend to have more sexual partners over all, people in monogamous relationships tend to have sex more often. Most of the 'hook-up culture' millennials you're imagining h…
/r/MensRights14/01/19 03:27 PM
4

"Despite their reputation for hooking up, Millennials and the generation after them (known as iGen or Generation Z) are actually having sex less often than their parents and grandparents did when they were young," said Twenge. "That's partially because fewer iGen'ers and Millennials have steady partners." My interpretation is that younger generations, without the pressure to marry early, are much more likely to be single, and therefore more likely to not be having sex. While they may have more s…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:50 PM
4

Speculation; the data suggest our generation are less sexually active over all, and less likely to form exclusive relationships. Don't confuse the increase in the availability of data, with an increase in the subject matter.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 06:34 PM
3

a time where Cuckolding was not as widely accepted as it has become in the last 20 years or so. Y'all need to spend less time on the internet, friend
/r/MensRights13/01/19 02:33 PM
30

Why would being asked to support your arguments with evidence be a bad thing? e: pre-ignoring the 'feminists don't need to' as it's patently false, and useless whataboutism
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:04 PM
1

The childs well-being outweighs your desire to not be tied down. What the woman could or should have done has no bearing on that. Once the child is born, what is fair to the man or woman is not relevant; the childs well being outweighs your preferences, or sense of fair play.
/r/PussyPass27/10/18 06:37 PM
1

Yes, a child's well-being outweighs a person's desire to avoid being tied down. Don't get a vasectomy then. It is not difficult to avoid pregnancy; use two forms of birth control.
/r/PussyPass27/10/18 03:38 PM
1

After the child is born, the quality of life of the parents is superceded by the quality of life of the child. You don't get to punish the child because it's inconvenient to you.
/r/PussyPass27/10/18 01:07 PM
1

If you think that's what I'm saying, you can only have misread my initial post. I did not say that men are currently forcing anything on anyone. My post is pointing out that any deviation from our current 'Women have unilateral control over abortion' requires the possibility of a woman being forced to [abort/carry to term] a foetus, against their will.
/r/PussyPass18/10/18 06:20 PM
1

I just mean in the sense that you're just insulting me, rather than engaging with what I'm saying. It's not useful to either of us to have a conversation like this.
/r/PussyPass18/10/18 06:16 PM
1

Based on your responses, I feel you're more interested in trying to get a rise out of me than with actually discussing the issue. I'm not going to reply again, good day.
/r/PussyPass18/10/18 06:13 PM
1

Your reply is a complete non-sequitur. You haven't referenced anything that I posted, you've just stated words from your opinion. Read my response, make a good faith attempt to understand what it says, and then make a meaningful reply; otherwise all I can say is 'You're wrong both in your conclusions and your presuppositions, and that is why you're wrong', which I'm sure you'll appreciate is not helpful.
/r/PussyPass18/10/18 05:47 PM
1

What went wrong in your life, that you think the appropriate response to this story is 'prosecute the child'.
/r/PussyPass18/10/18 05:13 PM
1

The answer is 'tough shit' because literally every other possibility allows for (or rather has the only 'benefit' of allowing) the potential of you either forcing a woman to carry a child to term (a physically demanding and dangerous task for the woman), or of you forcing a woman to get an abortion (a physically demanding and dangerous task for the woman) against her will. Your position and hers are not equivalent. It feels unfair, and it is; there is no alternative without denying a woman bodil…
/r/PussyPass18/10/18 05:07 PM
6

Murder is defined as 'illegal killing'. If it's legal, by definition, it is not murder.
/r/PussyPass18/10/18 05:03 PM
1

To be honest, because he didn't need it, and she did. It's like, no ones gonna jump in and stop a geriatric from laying hands on a 20 year old, not because it's okay, but because they don't need to get involved, to protect someones health.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/18 03:37 PM
-9

That's sort of the point; you have the luxury of not being bothered. I've had unrequested sexual advances made at me, and they made me feel good. This does not mean that sexual advances, in general, are good, because: context matters. As men, we do not suffer the indignity of daily undesired sexualisation, rather we suffer from the daily lack of desired sexualisation. Here's a scientific graph: Less ................................................................................. More <---------…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 06:02 PM
-9

It should be looked down upon but still it does no harm and can be easily ignored. Not all harm must be physical, emotional harm is an accepted legal thing. Cat calling, by the evidence of the women who have been harmed by it, harms women. If it's persistent from one or a group of individuals then you can make a case of public disturbance but going around wasting police time on citing every person that wolf whistled is ridiculous. Supposition; it is not wasting police time for the police to pros…
/r/MensRights09/07/18 05:39 PM
-20

Context matters. Someone publicly drawing attention to finding you attractive happens extremely rarely, because you are male; therefore it is desirable, or at worst, dismissable. For women, the opposite case is standard.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:40 PM
1

A woman who has sex more than you think is acceptable; based on the inaccurate assertion that women who have more sex have their genitals disfigured in some way.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/18 05:51 PM
4

It's possible to commit a crime, and not be found guilty. In that case, in common parlance, you would be (de facto) guilty or not innocent; but in the eyes of the law (de jure), you are not guilty, or innocent. Interestingly, scottish law has a specific arrangement for this. A jury can choose to acquit a person as 'not proven' rather than 'not guilty'. "The result is the modern perception that the "not proven" verdict is an acquittal used when the judge or jury does not have enough evidence to c…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:26 PM
14

A specific instance of sexual assault requires specific instances of people. The general size difference of men and women is not relevant to the specific case of a particular domestic violence case. In this specific case, I would feel threatened if someone had their arm around my neck and was pulling me towards them; and I would not feel comfortable defending myself against a woman in that case.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/17 01:30 PM
34

Some men are physically weaker than some women, and some men are indoctrinated from birth to never under any circumstances, be physically aggressive towards women.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/17 12:56 PM
1

Most countries, including the US, limit speech in some regard.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/17 07:57 PM
1

I legitimately think he's just stupid.
/r/PussyPass22/06/14 03:13 AM
1

ob·tuse əbˈt(y)o͞os,äb-/ adjective adjective: obtuse 1. annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand. "he wondered if the doctor was being deliberately obtuse" synonyms: stupid, slow-witted, slow, dull-witted, unintelligent, ignorant, simpleminded, witless; It is satire. There is no two sides to this. It is 100% a joke. Whether 'pussypass' is a thing or not is irrelevant, this particular example is not an example of it. "Sources have confirmed that the principal of the school is not even active …
/r/PussyPass18/06/14 09:08 PM
1

There's reserving judgement based on a lack of evidence, and there's being obtuse.
/r/PussyPass18/06/14 07:20 PM
3

But it isn't though. Are you seriously that stupid? This is a joke article. It is satire. The events described didn't actually happen. Do they not have jokes where you are from?
/r/PussyPass18/06/14 06:46 AM
-1

Crazy is the equivalent, in that it completely dehumanises them and any opinion they can hold. In fact, I've described 'creepy' to girls before as being the male equivalent of crazy. They seemed to understand.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:21 PM
1

Which is a complete strawman argument. I am not saying any part of what you are saying that I am saying. I am not saying that lying to someone before you have sex with them makes the sex rape. I am saying that if there is a condition you need to meet in order for the sex to take place, and you knowingly and willfully lie in order to make sex that would otherwise not hjave happened happen. Something akin to lying about wearing a condom.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:47 PM
2

I don't consider lying your way into someone's pants a joke.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:21 PM
2

Women and men can choose to not have sex. Nothing I said disagrees with that. I will note that I have deliberately avoided using gendered language.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:06 PM
2

Which is exactly what you said the first time. My reply stands. None of the things you listed were conditions for the sex to occur. If there is an explicit statement of 'I will only have sex with you on the condition that x is true', and you lie about x so that you can have sex with them (where telling the truth would have meant they would have chosen not to have sex with you), then you have willfully deceived them, or in other words coerced them into having sex with you. Which is rape.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 03:01 PM
1

Actually that would be rape, legally (depending on your jurisdiction) and ethically. Rape is not limited to physical coercion. And you might consistently lie 100% of the time, but don't bring the rest of us down to your level.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 02:49 PM
1

Only if her not hurting you was the condition for your having sex, and she knowingly intended to hurt you. Otherwise, the two are not related.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 01:52 PM
6

I honestly thought it was referencing high male suicide rates.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:19 PM
4

This is in response to a huge amount of sexual assault in India in recent months (and presumably longer). India is a misogynistic society, and the men there do need to learn how to treat women right. This isn't directed at you.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 01:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter