TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

themizlfoshizl Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by themizlfoshizl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

then that makes you/us what? the chemo? I fail to see how this attitude constitutes a cure unless you view all feminists as rad-fems? and if so, then again, what does that make you/us?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 03:22 AM
3

by the same token, what does the types of responses in this thread imply about the 'teachings' of MRA's
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:28 AM
6

Wow. nice work MR. OP comes in with an olive branch post, and you completely destroy her. Now we all look like radical women haters we're made out to be. Thanks for your post, OP, I appreciate your input
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:26 AM
3

really well put
/r/MensRights01/01/13 05:14 AM
7

unless you're rocking some PM's we're unaware of, i don't see anyone calling you pretentious/ignorant. they did, however, challenge your use of the word. I think everyone needs to chill out for a second. good points raised by both sides here, especially the 'put a human face on the issue'
/r/MensRights24/11/12 12:43 AM
1

i'm curious as to your blog
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:14 AM
3

It did have some pretty decent coverage in nsw when o'farrel first launched his arsenal of plans to combat the increased bikie shootings across sydney.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 05:46 AM
3

well i suppose thats where we are going to have to differ. I don't believe that hedging your bets purely due to a possible chance of disaster is a way to live. counterproductive.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:51 PM
1

or feel they have to, adding to degradation of the relationship.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:39 PM
7

too many holes in the argument. firstly, the projection of the female attitude. secondly, the implication of complete male provision of assets in a relationship. third, the concept of a clean break is completely possible, and does happen in a number of divorces, but obviously, we only hear about the bad ones. It seems to me most of this is dependant on really knowing your partner, really knowing. or if you prefer "don't stick your dick in crazy"
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:37 PM
5

fair enough, not questioning, just curious. interesting to know these things
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:27 PM
5

yeah, a rather pessimistic perspective to have of the scenario. you advocate a double-edged sword, and suggest distancing yourself from relationships and commitment/marriage etc. your intentions may be good, but the implications are counter-productive to the mra. it makes us look like angry yobs.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:25 PM
10

hmmm, interesting. propogation delay? dynamic ip ftw, shame about the tenure though, 2 years
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:08 PM
9

haha read this one yesterday, sent it to my mrs, had a good laugh. I think there may be more to this than what was reported. i'd be interested to have more background. observational analysis doesn't really take into account pre-existing circumstances, reasons why the men are doing it. also, suicidebanana is off his rocker
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:39 PM
1

it's a parody. check point #8. lawyered.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:21 PM
1

appreciate you taking the time to respond. have fun, bro, best wishes from down under
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:49 AM
1

ths PZ myers twit is simplay an overly sensitive oblivious white knight type looking for attention via sensationalist writing. it smells of srs to me. typical biased bullshit, cherry-picks quotes to support his argument, niggle, you're all good. having just read your OP from the other day, i took from it an inspiring story from an analytical man. that hit home for me.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 11:21 AM
-1

you sir/maam, are amazing. until i read the lower line i completely believed you were serious. nice work
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:55 AM
2

I'm with you bro. you're a person. just like everyone else. Just like me. I don't label you, don't you dare do it to me.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:52 AM
3

well, it's still promoting a manipulative behaviour indeed, but with very careful wording you can avoid triggering red flags in the mind of your reader. This is madness. this is sparta... but seriously, you're right. are we that shit that our girlfriends/wives/female partners need to resort to trickery to achieve a positive outcome? couldn't honest conversation and respect achieve the same amicable outcome. grinds my gears, man.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 11:03 AM
9

BEST. ANALOGY. EVER.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 12:19 AM
1

finally! someone else who saw the (assumed unintentional) reference
/r/MensRights17/08/12 08:20 AM
0

are you donald glovers stand-up routine?
/r/MensRights17/08/12 04:10 AM
7

yeah. a bit odd. from seeing him on top gear, and now reading this, he seems like an ok sort of guy.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 10:01 AM
10

oath, i would have employed the physical barrier. you want to harrass my children, you go through ME
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:44 AM
3

this was recently wasn't it? though i think the father was aussie and the wife legged it to italy
/r/MensRights14/08/12 09:32 AM
1

thats a bit fucked up. his own kid?
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:56 AM
1

you idiots, this isn't an attack on mens rights, or bashing men, its a lame post for "appreciation of mom's". way to read way too much into it guys. clap clap
/r/MensRights24/06/12 03:44 AM
-1

wow, what a small minded person. I don't think i'd want your respect if you were giving it away.
/r/MensRights24/05/12 08:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter