TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

themunshta Archive

View 0 posts and 97 comments by themunshta on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

A very quick google search will list charities that range from low to moderate to high overheads. It’s a well known fact that it’s important to chose wisely in regards to which charities to give money to. Literally every single person I know is aware of this fact. People in your country must be stupid or something because where I am its a high percentage of people that are very dubious about the entire concept. A quick google search will also give you plenty of information about how much money c…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 12:09 AM
1

Either way champ, they’re a rip off. Very small percentages of the donated money in many cases never get anywhere near the people it’s supposed to help. This is absolute fact moron. It makes sense you sing their praises being one of the small percentage of people that get paid for their charity work, lots of people involved at the ground level do it for nothing. That technicality means you have a conflict of interest and puts you in the minority. The vast majority of people are very well aware o…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:47 PM
1

Yeah mate, just like the UK, thriving right? Great example of how to shit all over locals. Shit all over ya own people and virtue signal about how charitable you are hahahaha Lecturing to the rest of the world and your country has become the epitome of working class poor. Big charities are losing people that want to give money champ. That is a fact. They need big business more and more to remain viable that’s the only reason they survive. That’s also a fact. When the pretend economy gets real wh…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 05:19 PM
1

“Management cannot work that way”. Big charities aren’t working, so it’s a waste of everyone’s time and the only people that are gaining are the management. So it makes big charities irrelevant. It’s been that way for a long time. Trim the fat, close them down, let them go broke and let the management line up in the dole cue. Let them apply for jobs at companies that require them to make a profit, not non profit organisations such as charities. You’re right, it’s very simple. Big charities are a…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:45 PM
1

Ok mate, so what about the vast majority of people that put time into charities for fuck all? What about them? The people walking the streets and standing out the front of shopping malls, doing it all for FREE, while ya CEO’s are lining their pockets. That’s what is wrong with ya charity format champ. Because people are becoming less willing to give either their money or their time to charities that clearly aren’t helping people they are supposed to be helping, and they are helping in other ways…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:56 AM
1

Yeah ok champ, then that makes charities exactly the same as every other publicly listed company then doesn’t it. You can’t see the difference so I can’t help ya with that. That’s clearly how you think it should be. I think the definition of charity is giving something you have, whether that be time or money and resources for FREE! If ya want to get paid like a BHP board member, go and get a job working for BHP if ya good enough, and then donate some of that money, or the time it gives you in yo…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:35 AM
1

I have answered the question. Big charities stink. CEO’s of publicly listed companies technically do what they are paid to do, or try to on behalf of the wealthy owners. That’s make shareholders more money, and justify the boards ridiculous remuneration packages. Charities are about giving to people that need help. So when people running charities are getting paid at the levels of publicly listed companies the money isn’t going to where it should be. Capeesh? So no I think it stinks, it’s not ch…
/r/MensRights30/08/18 10:06 AM
1

Actually I’ve been thinking about opening up my own charity company and paying myself a couple of hundred grand to run it. Does that answer ya question mate? Sounds like you’re happy giving your money for the purpose of helping people that need it, only to make the fat cats richer. I’ll say it again buddy. More and more and more people are sick of that crap. Screw multinational charities and screw the greedy turds that run them! Hope that clears up my stance.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:28 AM
1

In one instance the intended recipients of the so called ‘profits’ are the needy. In the other the intended recipients are the shareholders. Very fundamental difference, I thought that would be fairly obvious. That’s the very reason that more people are having an issue with big charities and finding more direct and local ways of giving their hard earned money. Everyone is getting sick of the rich getting richer in general, and when that starts playing out in the charity sector of business then c…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 08:34 AM
1

That’s fine. I’m saying that people are getting sick and tired of charities that take in millions and millions in donations and pay CEO’s ridiculous amounts of money because people have no faith that much of the money gets to where it is intended. That is exactly what I’m talking about. I wonder how many charity boards the average charity board member sits on? Any idea. People are getting sick of greedy grubby people, half of whom have never done a decent hard days work in their lives, getting w…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 08:16 PM
1

Yep, it has created a big issue for the charity sector hasn’t it. When shareholders and therefore shareholder returns come into consideration then it ceases to be about charity, and more about who stands to gain other than the intended recipients of the charity, which is the needy. Shareholders should by shares in gold companies or oil companies not charity organisations. And the fact that shareholder concerns are an issue, as you’ve pointed out is at the core of the reason so many people have i…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 12:47 PM
1

I don’t necessarily disagree with what you are saying. We can argue about semantics all day. I think a lot of people actually have questions over where a lot of the money given to charities actually goes these days, whether they give dollars to people collecting outside shopping malls or it’s governments giving grants to charities out of tax dollars. As in how much of the money actually gets to the people that it’s meant to help in the first place as opposed to say, the CEO’s running said charit…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 08:26 AM
1

That’s the problem, the so called moderate feminists spend all their time trying to tell MRA’s and the rest of the male population how to express themselves and what to do. They don’t go to feminist circles and try to police there, because they get attacked just like anyone that tries to do that. They last all of 5 minutes, if that. Then the so called moderates of defenders of feminism come here and misrepresent feminism and what it stands for to people in places like this, that have a completel…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:13 PM
1

Just because government contract work out doesn’t mean they save money. Lots of companies get paid way overs for contracts, that’s exactly why it’s so valuable to be considered a preferred tenderer to government. Most of the time when governments are spending tax payers money they are wasting it. ‘Saving money’ by government standards does not necessarily mean saving money. Governments are natural wasters of tax payer money. “How much the CEO is paid has no bearing on how much the contract is wo…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 11:33 AM
1

No I don’t, but in principle people do care. To say that people don’t care is plainly wrong given that every second person has some complaint about governments wasting our tax moneys. Not knowing exactly where every one of those dollars is being wasted is not the same as not caring.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:30 AM
1

Well maybe the moderates should come out of the woodwork and call these extremists out on their man hate. Have you advocated for that in feminist circles at all? That seems to be what you are advocating here,
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:10 AM
1

As a tax payer I do. You can pay tax and not care what they do with you money, but I’d say most tax payers while not having much control over what governments waste the money on, actually do care.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:41 AM
1

I say that if anyone and I mean anyone hits me, they will be getting a receipt.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:26 AM
2

I’ve said a trillion times it doesn’t help the exaggerate.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:33 AM
1

Well that would make what I said sound quite arse about then wouldn’t it. I’m not from over there, so I may be wrong, it may be that 18 is the age of consent, but I’ve read it in numerous places that he was under the age of consent for California. He either was or he wasn’t, I even seen Megyn Kelly say as much while talking about it amongst an all female discussion group. They were trying very hard to to find a reason to defend her, but as I said Kelly had to concede that it was statutory rape. …
/r/MensRights26/08/18 01:30 AM
1

In California I believe the age of consent is 17, so by definition of the law, it’s statutory rape. There would no such attempts to defend a statutory rapist if the genders were reversed. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:34 PM
2

And sadly we haven’t solved the false rape accusation epidemic yet, and we haven’t solved the female biased family law courts issue yet, and we haven’t solved the inability to hold women accountable for the violence they do commit issue yet. And we haven’t solved the problem that mothers commit the majority of child abuse issue yet, and we haven’t solved the hypocrisy of feminist issue yet. Get back when you’ve come up with a plan to solve these issues, and until then, you can go walking around …
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:18 PM
2

She must want to find the most beta orbiter kind of man getting around, can only imagine what the last 10 dudes left would be like. You can hardly blame someone for falling for a trick they weren’t aware of, but any bloke with any balls would be at the closest pub having a counter lunch and washing it down with a schooner within 5 minutes of realising what was going on. Shows how some women have no idea what they want, and even less of a clue how to find it.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 06:18 AM
1

Hahahahaha boring and complaining sums up feminists to a T, who you trying to kid, yourself by the sounds of it.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:59 AM
0

So ya bot can’t find an accusation without an accompanying accuser either. That was you’re first argument turd brain and ya still wrong numb nuts
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:40 PM
0

Say what? You thought you farted but shit ya nappy instead? Haaaaaaaaaaaaa
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:41 AM
0

What?
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:24 AM
0

Lmfao, still waiting for the cow to jump over the moon then?
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:57 AM
0

Still repeating yourself I see. Haven’t done any research to back up your uneducated opinions? Still not one example to support the very first ridiculous argument you made. Troll feminist? I’ve read your unhinged stringing together of words. Typical feminist, anyone that disagrees with you doesn’t listen or “read” your words “properly”. Standard SJW femomoron. I’ve dismantled everything you’ve said, and quoted your ramblings while doing it. Hahahaha you must be such a bonus to have over for a ba…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:04 AM
0

You’re an arse wipe bwaaahahahaha feminist man hater. You are a promoter and defender of feminist man hate and call ya self an egalitarian but believe men deserve to be falsely accused because you refuse to hold women responsible for cunt behaviour. Yeah dumbo, accusations just fall from the sky. You are truly an example of what most normal people with a brain who come here realise they are up against. Find an example of an accusation without an accompanying accuser yet. No? That’s because they …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:27 PM
0

As I thought. You’re a feminist man hater
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:00 PM
0

“If you can’t read my comments properly I will not repeat myself”......says the moron constantly repeating himself lmfao.....”I will consider you leaving...” says the moron who has dropped into a mindless loop because he just can’t back up his argument......”or admitting you are wrong”.........says the moron who implies I’ve admitted that I’m wrong, when in fact I’ve said a bunch of times that I am 100% correct and you are 100% wrong, I never admitted anything.......”until you decide to conduct …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:53 PM
0

Hahahaha so no example of a rape accusation without having an accompanying accuser? Just as I thought. Just sit there rocking like a retard and repeat ya self. Bwahahahahaha you’re a special case you are. You have no idea how much help you actually need.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:24 AM
0

I’ve responded to what is relevant. And that is your stupid assumption that accusations invent themselves, which obviously they don’t. Nothing else to comment, the rest is irrelevant dude. And in true feminist style, you make dumb factually incorrect statements and refuse to provide one iota of evidence to back your argument. It is hard to provide evidence when none exists though right.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:22 AM
1

Find an example of a rape accusation that invented itself yet???? That’s all you have to do to prove you’re stupid uneducated point of view to be correct. You know, like back yourself up with facts. Or just stamp ya feet and yell at people when facts make you feel as though you don’t explain yourself well at all. Go on champ, get me the evidence you are convinced exists. Just do it. Bet you can’t, go on.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:18 AM
1

Hahahaha start by bastardising common sense, and then announce yourself as the ‘winner’ by calling me a cunt. Bwaaahahahaha exactly what feminists do. Hahahaha you’re killing me
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:15 AM
1

You proved my point, and you did from the start and you keep doing in. Thank you. You’re easy to win a debate with. Didn’t do debating at school. You did gender studies instead right. Right? Hahaha that’s working well for you chumpy
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:11 AM
1

Don’t get upset. Yelling again. You know another way to lose people in an argument. Yell !!!! Hahahaha you don’t understand even the most basic of communication skills clearly.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:09 AM
0

Yep, I’m saving time. Don’t need to. You fucked your argument every time very early on. Like you did from your very first response. Duuuuuuh
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:08 AM
0

Don’t need to read anymore, and I don’t need to down vote you either champ. You down vote yourself your total misunderstanding of basic definitions.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:07 AM
1

Hahahahaha, why are you yelling. Sounds like you get upset when people disprove your waffling with facts that you can’t refute hahaha you’ve got feminist written all over ya
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:06 AM
0

“Fewer people will agree with you and more people will oppose you”........um um um, yeah you should forget about agreeing or disagreeing with people that you yourself see as ‘friendly’ or the ‘enemy’ respectively, and worry more about truth. That’s what smart people do. You can argue against something that is very clearly, very obviously and very simply true if you like, but you make yourself look like an idiot. Have you found an example of a rape accusation that doesn’t have an accuser yet?? Ha…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:04 AM
1

Before you ramble on with more nonsense, give me one example of a rape accusation that you only of that doesn’t have an accuser attached to it.....hahahaha go on smart arse hahahaha plenty of allegations flying around in the age of the METOO movement, you’d have to agree with that. So plenty of examples to flip your way through. Go on genius. Name one person that is charged with rape, that doesn’t have someone that made the accusation. Hahahahaha like i said, you are a danger to yourself. Stupid…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:53 AM
0

I don’t see you as an enemy champ, I see you as a pea brain that argues from a completely factually incorrect standpoint, and it’s as obvious as the balls that hang off the back of a bull. You just keep keeping it unreal, call yourself an egalitarian because you think it sounds good, and keep arguing exactly like a feminist. You have zero common sense dude.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:46 AM
0

No one with a brain keeps insisting that accusations get made without someone making them. But you are. And there is only 2 people in this conversation. You are a danger to yourself
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:43 AM
0

And just for the record, I literally only read the first sentence of every one of those comments. No need to read the rest, and I couldn’t be bothered. There is nothing to learn from you champ that the feminists haven’t already tried to ram down everyone’s throat. Seriously, you should get your head out the darkness, you sound exactly like a dim witted feminist that can’t understand why people don’t take the silly things you say seriously. Peace out!
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:31 AM
1

“No it isn’t”.......um yes it is. To say something is unintentional means it wasn’t intended. Any accusation or allegation, whether false or legitimate is made with intent. That’s 4 comments you’ve made and you’ve destroyed your argument in the first sentence every time hahaha. No need to even read the rest let alone debate it with you. I’ll help you out champ. I’ll give you an example of say how someone can make an ‘unintended insult’.....here we go. So someone asks someone else......”do these …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:26 AM
0

“But it wasn’t, it was quite plainly intentional”....hence proving my point. Saying ‘we have to make sure’ that it “wasn’t an unintentional false accusation” is just stupid, and that’s what I pointed out in my original and very short reply to someone else, again you prove my point in you’re very first sentence, thank you
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:15 AM
0

“I’m an egalitarian”....then why do you argue exactly like a feminist ?
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:13 AM
0

I’m very familiar with the idea of intent. Accusations don’t arise without someone’s direct intent to make an accusation....it’s you that needs to brush up on some very basic definitions, not me. That’s the first thing you’ve said, so I don’t even need to read let alone argue the rest.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:12 AM
1

Way to dismiss the issue of false allegations and excuse the bastard false accusers, you are disgusting and you are a huge part of the problem..... and you are a dimwit now do me a favour and piss off!
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:19 AM
0

“But you refuse to believe they exist for no apparent reason..,” hahahahaha yeah because allegations and accusations just turn up without anyone doing a thing.....hahahaha you haven’t got a clue what you are talking about, you’re a man, so you’re a male feminist hahahahaha
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:18 AM
0

No you really have to believe me, I really didn’t mean to call you a dumb arse, and obviously I have no idea if you are a rapist or not, just like anyone who isn’t present but coerces someone to make an accusation. So it was completely unintentional, feel better princess hahahahaha. Didn’t get a rise out of you eh? Then why did you mention it. If you took what I said how it was clearly meant, which was to make a point, you would have even mentioned it, Hahahaha keep up the femmo double speak / t…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:08 AM
0

The point is, once again, that the term “unintentional false allegation” is implying that it’s an accident. I made my point the first time and it wasn’t to you. Toxic masculinity, mansplaining etc is as stupid as making excuses for false allegations by using the term “unintentional false allegation”. It’s also as stupid as saying “unintentional legit allegation”. Allegations and accusations don’t make themselves happen by accident. It doesn’t make one iota of a difference the actual reason why a…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:03 AM
0

Last point. Referring to an allegation that is false as unintentional is an insult to anyone’s intelligence and you are defending it. Toxic masculinity anyone? Male privilege? Sorry for having to mansplain something that’s so obvious and simple to you. Good bye !
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:54 AM
0

I used those things as an example and stated clearly that. You taking offence actually proves my point, well done! Because, me saying that I unintentionally called you those things is a cop out right. Right? Hardly makes you feel better right? Exactly champ. Unintentional false accusations don’t exist.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:51 AM
0

Someone else, a person that happens to defend the concept of toxic masculinity among other feminist concepts said “unintentional false allegation”, which like toxic masculinity doesn’t exist. I agreed that things like coercion and loss of memory play their part. I also said that when for any reason someone can not remember, you can throw in being regretful, and when someone who wasn’t there convinces someone they were raped (coercion) that the allegations should be taken with a grain of salt, wh…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 12:47 AM
1

Never said it was an accident. I said allegations either false or legit, are not made by accident. There is no such thing as an unintentional allegation of any kind. No one accidentally makes an allegation. Let’s just say i accused you of being a moron, or say a dumb arse, or say a rapist, that is not an accident, and saying it was unintentional after I was proven wrong is just bullshit. I’m not calling you those things by the way, but if I did, to say it was unintentional after the fact is just…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 06:03 PM
1

Yeah because men invented the term toxic masculinity. That must have been during some weekly patriarchy meeting somewhere some time /s. Just like men invented the term internalised misogyny. And men collectively invented the terms manspreading, mansplaining and decided it was a good idea to start lecturing 5 year old boys about the so called privilege they were born with. Righto, what ever you say. I will generalise about feminism again for you. It’s a hate movement. You may disagree, but that w…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:31 AM
-1

Well in terms of drunken confused memories, accusations should be taken with a grain of salt, which we know isn’t the case. In the terns of being influenced by other people to make accusations, it’s no accident is it. It’s an accusation almost by proxy, but no accident. While I agree with the circumstances you listed, any kind of accusation is never by accident. When an accusation is made whether false or legit, it’s never by accident.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:14 AM
1

It’s invented by feminists. Feminists refuse to allow women to be held accountable. That’s what it’s a nonsense. We probably agree on a lot by the sounds, I think that it’s an idiotic generalisation of masculinity as do lots of people, that only feminists use, while at the same time losing their shit when their is a sniff of generalisation of women. Actually feminists talk nonsense every time they open their mouths, hence so much sarcasm.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:09 AM
1

It’s invented by feminists. Feminists refuse to allow women to be held accountable. That’s what it’s a nonsense. We probably agree on a lot by the sounds, I think that it’s an idiotic generalisation of masculinity as do lots of people, that only feminists use, while at the same time losing their shit when their is a sniff of generalisation of women. Actually feminists talk nonsense every time they open their mouths, hence so much sarcasm.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:09 AM
2

I’m not. I’m actually highlighting them. Read what I said again. It sounds ridiculous doesn’t it. That’s the point. Sometimes it’s hard not to be sarcastic when the arguments that feminists make are so obviously stupid. Sarcasm is used a lot to do this. Funnily enough being sarcastic about the arguments that femmos put forward makes them angry hey. Funny that. I don’t mean any offence, I’m as pro men’s rights as anyone, I should have put the old /s at the end to avoid confusion. Interesting that…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:56 AM
1

Sarcasm has its place. What does promoting the concept of toxic masculinity achieve? They’ve been banging on about for quite a while and from what feminists are saying it’s done absolutely nothing. It’s just sarcasm, don’t beat yourself up about it.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:45 AM
0

Sarcasm
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:38 AM
5

The concept of male privilege is an ass like the laws that go with it. Western women are the most privileged group of human beings ever to grace the face of the earth.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:53 AM
1

And this is a big part of why home education is on the rise, rapidly. Parents are privately paying teachers to teach their children Maths Science and English and not the progressive version of ethics.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:51 AM
0

“an intentional false allegation”......as opposed to a non intentional accusation. Like people accidentally make false accusations. That’s a good one!
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:45 AM
1

The irony hey. Generalisations are very very bad when made about women, hurts their feelings. Women are aaaaaaall different, very very different. Oh, and don’t take generalisations about your man group personally, whether they actually apply to you or not. Just change nnnnkay. Got it? The lack of self awareness is as staggering!
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:34 AM
8

MGTOW + men avoiding toxic women + men wising up + men and women avoiding white knight feminist arse kissers + men avoiding marriage and cohabitation thanks to the very obvious risks = a much larger group of people than “a small group of hate mongers.......women complaining about ‘where have all the good men gone’ (read: why don’t men want to marry me and look after someone else’s kids) is also a growing group. Your denial does not change how 3rd grade mathematics actually works in the real worl…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 10:43 PM
1

Haha I’m hearing ya mate, it seems the stupidity isn’t that hard to see for reasonable people.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 10:17 PM
1

Hahaha brilliant! I already know the next person I’m going to use this on and I can already see the look on her face. Hahaha That’s gold mate!!!
/r/MensRights20/08/18 11:31 AM
1

Absolutely nothing!
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:04 AM
0

Yeah but toxic femininity is just women imitating standard male behaviour, which is toxic by every feminist definition. Even standard chivalry is viewed as benevolent sexism these days. So let’s keep the focus firmly on deriding masculinity, including that toxic behaviour exhibited by 5 year old boys, until all men adapt their behaviour to appease feminists and their standards, and the world will be free of toxic femininity too. Sort of like killing 2 birds with 1 stone. Once we’ve achieved this…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:51 AM
3

Sounds great, try explaining that to anyone that loudly and proudly associates with the feminist movement. They stand for ‘equality’ apparently and they’ll agree with you that sexism affects both men and women, and that’s where it ends. They’ll then tell you that all that sexism that’s flying around everywhere is the fault of toxic masculinity, and that’s where any recognition of males issues ends. That’s why many men and many women stopped seeing feminists as the sole arbiters of equality and f…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:30 AM
2

Yep. And then you look at the monopoly they have on tax payer funded get government handouts and consider the fact that they make the vast majority of discretionary consumer spending decisions, it becomes obvious that women don’t actually have to earn it all to spend most of it. The gender pay gap theory the way they insist on selling it has been totally debunked so many times. Only complete imbeciles that have zero understanding of basic mathematics believe it.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 05:02 AM
1

Some men accept it, some don’t.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:07 AM
1

So the answer must be that any harm caused by toxic femininity is only indirectly. Hahahahaha jeezuz christ. So my mate who lost half vision in his right eye when his abusive ex missus rammed a schooner glass into his face wasn’t directly harmed by the toxic bitch, just indirectly. You could ask that very straight forward question another 50 times and you will not get an answer. I guess toxic women aren’t responsible or to be held responsible for their toxic behaviour....or sumpent like dat
/r/MensRights16/08/18 10:07 AM
1

For what it’s worth, I don’t see it as me ‘winning’. I don’t really care about ‘winning’, Unless I’m leaving the casino, or my footy team is playing in the grand final. I care that our kids can grow up without being fucked over and confused by stupid gender stereotype theory that’s being rammed down their throats instead of learning maths, science and true history, . I care, and I want girls and boys to be able to use their own brain instead of having people telling them how to think. I care abo…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:17 AM
1

Don’t you? Well that’s your subjective opinion isn’t it. I actually don’t care whether you are angry or not. Makes no difference to me what so ever. You are defending feminism and it’s insidious ideas about gender stereotypes though, which in my opinion makes you a feminist. In my opinion I think that makes you part of the minority. The noisy minority of feminists that generally get all bent out of shape when people disagree with you. Don’t you observe typically feminist behaviour? Is it a crime…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:25 AM
1

Femmos get angry when men don’t listen (read: disagree) and they get angry when women don’t listen (read; disagree). They think they are the moral authority on everything. They aren’t. You’re welcome hahahahaha
/r/MensRights15/08/18 01:18 AM
1

All you’ve done is show exactly how a conversation with a feminist goes around and around in circles and gets absolutely nowhere. It’s only when feminists are involved does this happen. Actually, most of the time the observation of effeminate men and masculine women are just that. Observations. It’s the feminists that want to make these observations out to be insults, not men or masculinity. This is because feminists literally think they have the god given right to define everything, including m…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 01:12 AM
1

Wrong again. I said that I give women more credit than you do. You then used quotation marks to conflate what I said with something that was nothing to do with what I said. Feminists are the people that are hung up on all of their theories. No one else takes it seriously apart from seeing the damage that it is doing, and largely to women. Men are walking away from feminist women, don’t know if you’ve noticed. Women that are interested in having healthy relationships with men are ditching feminis…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:52 AM
1

I think the vast majority of men actually do cooperative with one another most of the time. This is observably true. I think it’s obvious that men cooperate better than women do. This is also observably true and every non feminist woman would agree. To spruik the opposite and to generalise it into feminist theory about masculinity is well, well it’s what feminists do. That’s why feminists feel that men aren’t listening. Which they aren’t. Men aren’t listening to feminists anymore. Women aren’t e…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:37 AM
2

Again wuuuuuuut? No! It’s nothing like that at all. Feminists think women are so weak that they can’t speak for themselves, I don’t view women like that, you do. If that is the way you take my words, you are proving part of my point. It’s why no one takes feminists seriously apart from feminists. You can quote yourself, not me. Fun fact: roughly 90% of women don’t identify as feminist. Any idea why? In fact, more and more women are actively distancing themselves from feminism, and you think wome…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:31 AM
1

Men have been cooperating for the benefit of others and the greater common good for a long time, you know that right. Men being cooperative or compassionate being seen as weak is a total feminist fabrication. There isn’t a man on the planet who thinks this, and non feminist women don’t see cooperative men as weak. Only feminists say this. They say this because it helps promote the idea that men think the only way to be strong is by exerting their toxic male privilege. It’s only feminists that ca…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:21 AM
1

See, I give women more credit than you do
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:11 AM
2

Wuuuuuuuut? Hahahahaha yeah righto. Maybe then feminists should actually start saying what they mean then and leave our children alone. Feminists don’t speak for all women, only feminists think they do. As I said, I’ve plenty of women in my life that all by themselves have decided they aren’t the weaklings that feminists make them out to be. The women in my life don’t see men as inherently privileged, that is one hundred percent a feminist construct. If you think otherwise I’d say you are defend…
/r/MensRights15/08/18 12:10 AM
1

By exceptions I’m guessing you mean the family law court, the law court, health and education, affirmative action plans that are non existent for men and boys. Ask a feminist to list where women have it better and aren’t systematically oppressed by men....crickets !
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:58 PM
2

Yeah ok, well when feminists stop lecturing boys about male privilege and when the world stops telling women they are the best at everything and the only thing stopping them achieving their dreams and ambitions is male privilege, comparing those 2 quotes might actually hold some weight. You are in the minority if you can’t see the difference
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:54 PM
1

No you’re right, 3rd wave feminism sees the world as one big patriarchy where women are nothing but oppressed, by men. No zero sum game in that view, so we agree on that
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:50 PM
1

No I don’t think all women are toxic. I think feminists and feminism is toxic. I have plenty of women in my life that aren’t toxic. It’s a feminist trick that conflates criticising toxic feminists with criticising all women. The biggest critics of female toxicity are non feminist women, a fact that feminists conveniently dismiss. I stand by the fact that women can be toxic, and there is a correlation between this and feminism. Not sure if you can actually see the difference, but the idea of toxi…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:23 PM
2

Trick question right? I say yes, then it confirms that I promote a male>female view and therefore I promote patriarchy and prove the theory, Let’s try this instead. I actually think that men are better than women at many things. It’s quite obvious and observably true if you are allowed to remove yourself from the feminist version of ‘anything a man can do a woman can do better’. These things have been well and truly proven over and over. Here is a question for you. This being just one standard m…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:01 PM
3

Like in the family law courts, the law courts, the education system, the health system or just the general society where the default is chivalry? Is that what you mean by male>female? Or is it a place where excuses are constantly made for women’s violence to the point where everyone is expected to believe that women are always victims and men are always perpetrators??? You know the society that punishes men even in instances in which they are defending themselves from violent toxic women? Is tha…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 10:04 PM
1

This isn’t a zero sum game for me either. Toxic femininity is promoted and thrives within feminism. Feminism is the most toxic ideology on the planet and far outweighs the so called effects of toxic masculinity which I’ve never heard a feminist be able to define by the way. Everything about men is toxic according to feminism that’s what it comes down to. That’s why feminists like to lecture to young boys about the apparent privilege they are born with. Teaching young boys to hate themselves? You…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:41 PM
2

Women are the first victims of toxic femininity, feminists will work that out sometime in next million and a half years. It’s all to do with how feminists can’t express itself without referencing toxic masculinity and patriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 11:02 AM
3

For every 10 girls attracted to a tall guy, there is god knows how many girls that settle for short guys with fat wallets
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter