TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thenopornographers Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by thenopornographers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I tend to shoot first with the ad hominems to be honest haha fair enough! I wasn't worrying about being abused, I was just pointing out that they were derailing the argument, a classic tactic when you can't think of a point (however cogent it was at the beginning is up for debate)
/r/MensRights27/07/17 03:13 PM
0

I don't doubt you do. But look at this sub, loads of posts about false accusations, circumcision, mental health at a few hundred upvotes; and this at many thousand. Its frustrating. as a man and a feminist I struggle with those terms. imo, in one sense it's useful to have a vocabulary to talk about an issue, e.g., something like 'manspreading' that is done by basically only men (a minority of men). But equally you don't want to unnecessarily piss people off or generalise to the point of it not b…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 03:11 PM
1

hah, well, I'm a man, so I guess a man abusing a man? Anyway, I'm sure you'd be the first person to point out an ad hominem attack if it was your points not being engaged with, but of course, if I do it, it's because I'm a snowflake corbynista or whatever. Why with the double standards?
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:46 PM
1

that was exactly what I was suggesting...
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:43 PM
0

I am a man, and no it isn't, and as I've repeatedly pointed out, it's only 25% of men -- how is that a difficult concept to grasp? population sit in discomfort just so you don't feel offended the person next to the spreader is literally sitting in discomfort also, right? It isn't about being offended. Again, and again, you guys resort to bashing 'feminists' because you don't have an actual argument.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:40 PM
-4

sweet argument
/r/MensRights27/07/17 12:14 PM
-4

lol and there we go, resorting to personal abuse, classic
/r/MensRights27/07/17 12:13 PM
2

yeah that's becase people assume you're an asshole and don't feel comfortable asking you to stop
/r/MensRights27/07/17 12:13 PM
-6

But why should you have to ask in the first place? You know it is a legitimate cause for public annoyance, but because you think it's done by spooky feminists, you have to be against it. That is basically 95% of the mens rights movement. mate, only 25% of men do it, its not about anatomy. stop making it out like its a mens rights issue. Its a minority of anti-social people vs the public issue.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:59 AM
-28

you've not addressed any of my points, because you know it's a dick move, but you don't want to stop doing it. re:shoulders, again, you're moving the conversation away from the issue because you don't want to accept the reality, that taking people's space with your legs means you're an asshole, but you don't want to stop, because, reasons. Men's hips are not so different from womens that you can't hold your legs together for a 30 min bus ride. Also, that only 25% of men do it, suggest you are wr…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:49 AM
-10

Why should I have to ask? You know you're doing something which is antisocial, which annoys people. So when someone sits down, just move your legs. If I came onto a bus blasting music on my phone, you would rightly think I was a dick, I would be an asshole. And there have been campaigns to stop people doing that, because its an annoying thing to do. Just like taking up other people's space. There's a million other examples. Why should the public have to ask someone to stop being an asshole each …
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:39 AM
-37

But normal, men who are not assholes have a biological need to sit without crushing their genitals I mean, that just isn't true is it. everyone here saying 'crushing', 'in a vice', etc. is just rubbish unless you are a pro athlete with thighs of steel or balls the size of tennis balls. Just sit a bit more carefully, its not rocket science. Also I am a man and the whole thing pisses me off. You love rubbing your thighs up against another passenger or fighting for leg space because you both can't …
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:22 AM
-8

Why though? It's something everyone has to deal with, that mostly men do. it's annoying. Why shouldn't those people be asked to stop? I actually think it is a perfect example of how the mens rights movement has lost its way. 'manspreading' (although perhaps an unnecessarily provocative name) clearly happens, clearly is mainly done by men, clearly is antisocial, and would take so little effort for most people to stop; maybe they didn't even realise, or didn't realise people were annoyed by it. Bu…
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:10 AM
-41

So what, it isn't so vastly different that it is difficult to keep your legs relatively straight. If you saw someone taking up two seats you'd think they were a dickhead; a commenter above has moaned about people putting their bag on a seat for instance. But you can go out of your way to justify taking up 3 people's leg space. Just got to grow up and accept that being asked to be a bit more polite on public transport isn't women trying to take our rights away.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 10:01 AM
-1

And they say men's rights isn't about hating women ha
/r/MensRights11/05/17 02:37 PM
0

Well 1 you didn't read my comment. This crime, bicycle related sentences. so your comment makes no sense in the context. Your comment is incorrect , biased, and badly informed. 2 Phillip Davis numbers give no sense of the types of crimes committed. And a conversation is not data is it? And in fact he rejects actual reports in favour of his own thoughts.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 02:36 PM
0

Because a men's rights perspective assumes the issue doesn't affect women. And because there is no difference in treatment of men or women which is the basis of the men's rights movement... And if you actually cared about men's rights commenters could have taken the time to investigate the issue rather than just calling her a cunt a bunch of times... Doesn't seem to be the basis for a legitimate rights movement does it?
/r/MensRights11/05/17 02:28 PM
-3

This is a fairly standard sentence in the UK for this sort of crime. It has nothing to do with her sex and everything to do with how little protection cyclists get under UK law. But of course, most people aren't here to discuss men's rights, they are here to yell 'cunt' at women.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:37 AM
8

Yes probably, the UK gives generally short sentences for murder with a vehicle. If you actually cared about the case beyond hating women you could pop over to r/bicycling and you'd find out. This isn't a men's rights issue, this is a cyclist's rights issue.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 09:34 AM
-2

I mean, has anyone read the article? It's based on a scientific study showing straight women are the group least satisfied sexually. Sure, it's a clickbaity headline, but it's based on fact.
/r/MensRights28/02/17 01:46 PM
13

I don't think it does. Sure, some women are arseholes. But we're talking a tiny percentage of the population that think differently to OP's post.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:02 PM
21

Yeah, I don't think this is controversial.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 03:00 PM
0

don't be fools for heavens sake. The Mail has 100s of articles weekly of the kind on the left about women (or written from the opposite angle, focusing solely on their bodies; having the same effect). If you're going to try and point out double standards (a potentially useful exercise) then maybe find ones based in some kind of reality?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:58 PM
2

not-normal is not a 'red flag'. I'm sure you do some things considered not-normal.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:55 PM
-1

you evidently aren't interested in having a discussion. I mean, read my first line. most likely good urban design (or any feeling of security) can't help triggering a PTSD event. But generally being in a safe-feeling environment can help soothe feelings of anxiety.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 12:32 PM
3

That is the most childish (and ignorant) thing I've read all day
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:04 AM
1

what if she wasn't aware of those red flags?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:02 AM
0

Well for sufferers of PTSD or anxiety unfortunately there's not a lot that urban design (for example, my speciality) can do compared to a quality mental health program. But things like having well-lit, clean streets, overlooked by residential buildings, can help in those situations and are all things that do much more to help the feeling of safety than the quantity of reported crime. That's a major part of any design, well-being. I don't really know what you mean by 'unreasonable expectation'? N…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 09:58 AM
-1

Tbf, that's just idiotic from the guy (I assume u/JohnSudo is a guy). The 'feeling of safety' as well as actual safety is paramount in any field that deals with security: urban design (see all sorts of manuals, design for streets, secure by design, etc.), vehicle design (any sort of design), any sort of personal protection, food safety... The feeling of safety is aboslutely about feeling safe.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 08:51 AM
1

Grow up. That wasn't even implicit in what I said. Once again, skipping the actual content of the argument.. :)
/r/MensRights13/12/16 01:34 PM
1

It is bad that children (and their mothers) are given priority? You'd prefer it is kids were freezing to death? How about: there isn't enough affordable housing or shelters. A key reason for this is because people continue to vote for candidates which lower taxes (among other things) making it impossible for local governments to buy land and build and maintain shelters.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:32 AM
1

Why is this re-framed as a mens rights issue? Surely this is a poverty issue, this is a poor policing policy issue, this is a class issue, it's a welfare issue, or a jobs issue, or a housing policy issue.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:26 AM
2

But isn't that the point? If you go into a toys r us, the dolls are labelled as 'girls toys', so they are given restrictions. There's a whole barrel of evidence from behavioural economics (for a pop version see Nudge) as well as standard shop layout professional guidelines that shows how much even this simple placement of goods affects how we consume them. I agree with you, that kids should be able to play with what they want. But to pretend that they are not externally influenced in that choice…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:21 AM
-1

He doesn't seem to cite anything.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:16 AM
-1

Kind of an ad hominem attack no? Don't want to discuss what she actually said? Easier I suppose to attack her as a mother than a thinker?
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:14 AM
10

Why should they have the right to discriminate based on sex? Isn't this what the subreddit is all about? Also, side note I guess: If you disagree with something just because someone you don't like agrees with it, you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:10 AM
0

It's mad to me that you'd feel strongly enough to post this on Reddit, but so narrow minded you can't see that obviously this isn't a 'mens rights' issue, and women face the exact same type of discrimination (e.g., expected to wear heals, and so on). This (and basically everything posted here) is an issue of equity, not 'mens rights'. By posting it here, you're setting it up as a men vs woman issue, whereas in reality it's a men and women vs pizza hut issue.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 10:07 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter