TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thenwordenforcer Archive

View 0 posts and 102 comments by thenwordenforcer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No man wants a high N woman
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 10:35 AM
1

Women want to fuck men who love them
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/23 10:34 AM
1

In what regard? All the arguments I give are data driven and backed scientifically.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 05:30 PM
1

It's nothing to do with religion
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 03:26 AM
8

It has been described several times on this sub as an instinctual repulsiveness. A male equivalent of "the ick"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 05:12 AM
2

Yes but a commonly held redpill belief is we dictate the rule, ignore the exceptions and act in accordance with the rule. It would not be a good strategy to teach young men to be a terrible person who is exceptional at having 1 of the 3 following traits looks, money, status at the detriment of the other 2
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 05:10 AM
1

A woman should never be sexually frustrated when in a loving relationship. Women interact with their sexuality in a much different manner to men. Women have an emotional sexuality, whereas for men it is more of a base pleasure. If a woman respects and loves her husband, it would be the only sex she could ever want. Feeling like you've missed out is worse damage than having sex before marriage This isn't a thing that would happen. The problem is the liberal media today are tricking women into bel…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 05:06 AM
1

Sir it’s actually gross how obsessed you are with trying to “help me”. It sounds controlling, misogynistic and dumb. What's controlling, misogynistic and dumb about it? I'm just providing information and potential advice in a sub specifically for these kind of debates Are you so miserable personally you spend your time trying to convince other people to be like you? I'm not trying to convince anyone to be like me, I'm providing them with the truth I’m not a man. I do not USE my sexual partners b…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 04:58 AM
1

You are valuable with your virginity. You have the potential to have a deeply fulfilling and passionate relationship full of love, sex and trust. Don't damage yourself
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 04:36 AM
2

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 02:51 AM
1

Your comment history shows you are not a virgin. It's nothing to do with "purity culture", if you could even define that term. It's to do with the fact that men do not take promiscuous women seriously. ​ No human loses their value for having sex Of course not, women don't lose their innate human value for having sex, but they certainly lose value on the dating market
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 01:35 AM
1

The relationship women have to their sexuality is emotional. They don't just want to fuck like horny dogs all the time, that is a masculine trait. Women's sexuality is more reactive, whereas men's is more aggressive
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 01:33 AM
2

It is a gift the same way a man with good character, looks and empathy would be to you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 01:32 AM
1

What is it you want me to say? That I’m ashamed of myself? That because I’m a woman I should be subjected to nonsensical misogynistic bull? Usually women who have reached this stage of fuckup admit they've fucked up and work to change things, continuing to live in denial will only dig you a deeper hole. ​ I’m not looking for a d1 athlete or an insanely rich ceo. I want to live a normal happy life like anyone else I am trying to help you reach that goal by understanding that the less promiscuous …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 12:27 AM
2

1) You are obviously not a virgin 2) If its absolute bs why don't you explain why it's absolute bs? I'm more than happy to discuss in good faith
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 12:12 AM
3

-Unwilling to engage on intellectual level -Upvoted by idiotic echo chamber Sounds like the reddit I know, keep living in wilful ignorance
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 12:11 AM
1

"According to the Ethnographic Atlas by George P. Murdock, of 1,231 societies from around the world noted, 186 were monogamous; 453 had occasional polygyny; 588 had more frequent polygyny; and 4 had polyandry.". But, besides this, not everybody are parents, yet they still have some form of sex. You literally just proved my point😂 Notice how only 4 societies had polyandry, whereas polygyny happened in 453 + 588 societies. This literally illustrates the difference in attitudes men and women have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 12:07 AM
1

Something upset you?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 12:01 AM
1

Anyone who chooses to spend their sexual prime years staying celibate is simply not very interested in sex or they have sexual hang ups. False, women choose to stay celibate and save it for marriage because they value quality time and emotional connection over base and meaningless casual fucking. They have self respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 12:00 AM
1

You literally replied to my comment with "stop crying about the lack of sex then". And then you say "did I say you did it personally?" tf?😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 11:54 PM
0

Women would choose Viktor for a casual hookup/ONS and Zelensky for long term
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 11:53 PM
1

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31016490/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20dual%20mating,characteristics%20and%20dominant%20behavioral%20displays. This one focuses specifically on facial masculinity, but there are other markers of masculinity in other papers I could find.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 10:24 AM
3

Dual mating strategy stuff, quite common knowledge. Women usually select high status, attractive men for short term relationships, casual sex and flings. Whereas they select men who are kind, have financial resources, caring, emotionally intelligent etc for long term relationships. Or, as the following paper puts it https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31016490/#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20dual%20mating,characteristics%20and%20dominant%20behavioral%20displays. "According to the dual mating strateg…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 10:22 AM
1

If I wanted a relationship with anyone just to go around screaming I’m taken, I would have one without even trying. But I guard my commitment carefully. Let me translate, "my standards are ridiculously high to the point of delusion, and no man will ever be able to match up to them, however I keep holding onto the delusional belief that I will be able to lock down this perfect man, and will fuck other attractive men in the mean time" ​ Where are what men? The ones I’ve hooked up with? In bed beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 10:10 AM
0

What didn't you like about what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 10:02 AM
-5

Virginity is the biggest gift you can give your future husband. It is the one thing all men desire in their ideal future wife. Unless you are a virgin, you will never be 100% respected by your future husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 10:01 AM
1

Pair bonding isn't one sided, but women use sex for pair bonding, whereas men don't. The reason being a woman has historically had to trust a man before giving him access to her vagina, otherwise the results would be catastrophic. Getting pregnant and having to deal with 9 months of rearing a child is a huge evolutionary burden unless you can be 100% that the man will support and care for you during this process. Women get attached to men during the sexual process to ensure she stays around him,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 09:58 AM
0

Virginity is a gift because it lets the man know you are valuable, have strong morals, choose a man well, and are a serious contender for a long term relationship. It also tells him you have self respect, strong discipline, and value emotional connection rather than letting yourself get ran through like some soulless street prostitute.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 09:55 AM
1

The "pill" certainly lowered the bar for having casual sex. It's honestly astounding to me the mental gymnastics people will go to to justify crazy beliefs. Are you really telling me that contraception had little effect on casual sex attitudes? It quite literally enabled people to fuck without pregnancy or STI risk. What exactly do you think existence was like before the pill? People had sex with one partner, and had many children. Here is one link about the English to get you started: https://l…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 09:53 AM
1

redpill bullshit. "Redpill bullshit" isn't a great counterargument I'm afraid. Oxytocin is released by women post sex, the hormone that develops feelings of trust and connection, whereas for men it is just dopamine. This alone demonstrates the differences in attitudes towards sex between men and women. High count men are just as much of a bad bet as high count women. Their pair bonding ability might be a bit more resilient, but it's not resilient enough This is false. Every high status man throu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 09:48 AM
1

Huge strawman, where have I cried about the lack of sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 09:42 AM
1

Perhaps it is, but it's also the truth, there have been many studies done. That's not to say that you will be successful if you are ugly, but other factors such as status, confidence and sociability are far more important
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 09:39 AM
3

This is a good balanced take I like it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 09:38 AM
1

for a man or for a woman? For a man looks matter far less
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/22 02:39 AM
-5

Good. Save that for your future husband, that's the biggest gift you can give him
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:29 PM
2

OP is referring to for a long term relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:28 PM
5

Current research shows that what we like in LTR is the same we like in STR. Kind, sensitive, confident, assertive, successful, handsome men. Id love to see this "current research" because this goes against everything reasonable
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:27 PM
3

men literally don't give a shit as long as they can get sex. You are lying if you are saying you are attracted to nice guys
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:20 PM
1

This works exceptionally well in islamic cultures
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:19 PM
1

Yes I agree that's a silly outlook to have. I certainly would not expect an inexperienced girl to have sex with me early on, and would most likely take time to get to know her, and perhaps consider her for an LTR. Girls with lots of previous sexual experience, I would like to have sex after a certain degree of intimacy is reached, perhaps several dates in
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:18 PM
1

What does virgin slut mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:16 PM
1

Women are damaged by casual sex, however it is perfectly healthy for men. The optimal male mating strategy is to have casual sex with as many women as possible and have other men raise those children. Interesting how I was downvoted to oblivion for stating something that everyone knows is true. The cognitive dissonance on this sub at times is astounding
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:05 PM
1

sorry?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 11:03 PM
1

Only the top 10% of men get to enjoy casual sex with the remaining 90% of women. These top 10% of men have earnt the privilege of enjoying casual sex through hard work, diligence, becoming the master at some craft, achieving a position of status, or acquiring wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 10:24 PM
2

Men will lie to you in order to have sex with you. Where are those men now? You aren't still with them are you? Point proven. Men don't care for short term casual relationships, as long as they get sex. The truth will present itself when you approach the wall and try and desperately try and lock someone down into a serious relationship. It will be extremely difficult, and once you are with them you will be very unsatisfied
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 10:22 PM
1

what?😂
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 10:21 PM
2

You think it was normal before the sexual revolution for women to engage in casual sex? I am trying to steel man you here before I say anything further
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 10:19 PM
2

If it were not for social pressure to suppress certain activities women would act and be totally different. So it's not necessarily their biological make-up as much as it is the world around them that tells them to suppress it. "Social pressures"😂😂. That's just one dimension to it, have you ever considered the fact that perhaps it has something to do with the 300,000 years of human programming that told her to avoid indiscriminate sex due to the danger of pregnancy and stds? This wiring cannot b…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 10:18 PM
0

You are in the minority of men. Also, "experience" sexually has nothing to do with the number of bodies you have. It is usually the case that women who have been in 1 committed long relationship are better in bed than whores, because they have spent time growing to learn and understand the sexual process in a comfortable environment, instead of random drunken hookups
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 08:29 AM
1

They will put up with her for sex, but not take her seriously in a committed relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 08:26 AM
-2

It isn't "fetishization", it has nothing to do with it being a sexual preference. It is an indicator of your values, your future behaviour, your attitudes towards sex, and your mental stability.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 08:26 AM
0

"virgin" and "slut" in the same sentence, im confused what argument you are trying to make
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 08:25 AM
1

The vast majority of men care, a tiny insignificant minority do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 07:31 AM
0

NO MEN value high N count in a woman they want to take seriously. Let me repeat again NO MEN.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 07:29 AM
1

Most of that is influenced by societal norms. Let’s say there was no social stigma (because we can control this) against promiscuity in women, tell me exactly what the world would be like. Women have been unable to have casual sex for the past 300,000 years since the birth of mankind, until 50 years ago when the sexual revolution came about and birth control was released. Thus, the instinctive repulsiveness men feel towards promiscuous women is inherently hard wired. It is as hard wired as the f…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 07:27 AM
1

Not saying casual sex can't be harmful. If you're using it as a way to assuage some insecurities it can make them a lot worse Yes I agree, thanks for engaging. If you don't mind me asking, does the current man you are with now match up to the men you had previously had sex with, attractiveness and status wise?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 07:19 AM
1

Yikes 😂That settles it then
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 07:17 AM
3

Which part do you disagree with in particular? Do you deny the importance of oxytocin release and receptors in pair bonding? Or do you deny the fact that women have been incapable of having casual sex until 50 years ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 07:15 AM
3

Thanks for engaging, yes "impossible" was definitely a stretch, I would agree with the fact that it becomes significantly harder with the more casual sex. Because obviously there are outliers some women that have had alot of casual emotionless sex have maybe gotten lucky settling down with a guy. But on average if a women has casual sex hopping from guy to guy throughout her 20s and 30s then it will be much harder for her to find a partner. As well as this, there are studies to show the correlat…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 06:26 AM
1

I'd be interested in pursuing this discussion in good faith before being useless This reeks of bad faith Have a good day
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 06:19 AM
2

I'm very happy for you! How long have you guys been married my I ask? You are the exception, not the rule
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 06:03 AM
0

You can't argue that it was anything like it was now, with anywhere near the worldwide effects. As well as the western sex positivity push. The effects of previous forms of birth control have been negligible on the casual sex statistics and social attitudes towards female promiscuity
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 06:02 AM
-1

Women and effeminate liberal men defend the monopoly on casual sex because it benefits them. The women get unlimited easy access, and it matters not to effeminate men If America is persistent in diversity than it must also be ablied to dating norms. Fax
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 06:00 AM
-3

insane ramblings of reddit permavirgins Wow, excellent good faith and balanced critique
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 11:20 PM
-2

Statistical minorities are not the rule, they are the exception
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 11:11 PM
1

Why would women want to "increase their chances of getting pregnant"? No woman would want to get pregnant and be left to raise the child on her own. What benefit would there be in that? For the entirety of human history women have sought out the fittest partner, one with good genetics and one that they have bonded with emotionally in order for him to provide resources for the child rearing process. You really think women have always never slept around? Only prostitutes, social outcasts and other…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 11:10 PM
1

Which parts are unscientific? You still haven't engaged with a single argument and are still resorting back to the "incel" ad hominem😂 So pathetic
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 11:07 PM
-1

What part of it is nonsense? How about engaging with specific things I said instead of taking the easy out and dismissing it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 11:06 PM
1

Jesus christ, the "incel" ad hominem. How about engage with the arguments instead of making personal attacks? What part of what I said is bullshit? Every part of it has been scientifically proven
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 11:05 PM
-1

Whats it got to do with "incel"? Women are biologically hardwired to avoid casual sex, it is evolutionarily dangerous for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 11:04 PM
0

which for some weird reason It's only "for some weird reason" because you disagree with those values. If evo psych could justify that women have a biological imperitive to be whores and modern men have a biological imperitive to be cucks it would have
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:43 PM
1

Have you watched porn or masturbated since dating your girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:41 PM
9

What's misogynistic about it? The only time women have been able to indulge in casual sex has been the last 50 years, with the introduction of birth control. Never before in the 300,000 year history of homosapiens have women been able to have casual sex. Sex has always been taken seriously, as the consequence has been the burden of a child. Women having casual sex destroys their pair bonding ability and oxytocin pathways, making it impossible to ever settle down and have a fulfilling marriage/re…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:39 PM
-1

Yes, it is fighting against their own biological programming, the mating strategy they have held for millennia.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:26 PM
-2

Nothing wrong with men just wanting sex, but women who want casual sex are neurodivergent and mentally unwell
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:25 PM
-1

The stereotype seems to hold true the majority of the time. Those who it does not hold true for are neurodivergent
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:24 PM
-9

Why should men be held to the same standard? The biological dating strategy is entirely different. Edit: the amount of dislikes these comments are getting is crazy, people don't like the truth, and when told it they don't want to engage in discussion. The truth hurts guys
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:24 PM
-7

Women are damaged by casual sex
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:23 PM
-3

Women who want casual sex are fighting with their own programming, it is unhealthy for women to have casual sex
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:22 PM
2

You don't believe that some people are more desirable than others when it comes to dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:19 PM
2

human beings have a value on the dating market, it is a synonym for describing their average desirability
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 10:16 PM
2

He meant to say "in the dating market"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 12:06 AM
1

This is the true answer
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 12:06 AM
1

This is the opposite of a pickme
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 12:05 AM
1

A woman with a high N count
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 12:03 AM
0

I don't have statistics, but it's a solid theory based on reason. I wouldn't understand a reason why high N men would choose high N women for long term partners, when they have the option of choosing better. ​ It has been the long-held theory that women who have ridden the cc lock down a beta when the wall is nearing
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/22 12:00 AM
1

Male promiscuity and female promiscuity are very different, and evolutionary psychologists have long explained the difference between male and female attitudes towards sex, as well as their hard wired reasons for having such differences.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:50 PM
4

Pair bonding is not damaged by male promiscuity, it is damaged by female promiscuity
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:45 PM
0

This is disproportionately NOT the case, men with lots of options prefer quality women with low counts
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:44 PM
1

It is quite literally a selection criteria for a long term mate, the vast majority of men are intuitively repulsed by promiscuity. Only an insignificant minority are not. A statistical anomaly. Please don't bring out the "misogynist" slander, we can have a sensible discussion without it
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:41 PM
1

It's a selection criteria, just like you would judge a man's relationship worth off his height, wallet, status etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:32 PM
2

How isn't a whore gross? All men are naturally repulsed by it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:29 PM
0

If you've got statistics I'd be happy to see. Men are repulsed by high N counts, so it would naturally follow that those with the most options would certainly disproportionately choose those with low N counts. Your arguments defy reason
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 11:27 PM
1

Work on developing your value, you are still young as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 09:51 AM
2

I don't know how any of that was relevant but ok. I don't see the need to overcomplicate it, high N count whores end up with beta men who will provide for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 09:48 AM
1

You got the statistics for that "statistical truth"? I'd be very interested to see. Low count? Nope. Low count comes under the umbrella of "desirable woman". A desirable woman for an LTR is a woman with a low n count. This is universally understood by men
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 09:47 AM
2

It's everything you were conditioned to believe already. Literally the majority of stories, films, books etc Most romantic interactions are bluepilled
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 04:31 AM
2

i agree with you, but it doesn't change what I said
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 02:47 AM
7

This seems to be the case only at a younger age, in less serious relationships. The promiscuous man has lots of options, so doesn't need to lock down the high N count woman long term. When we are talking marriage, and lifelong partners, the promiscuous man will choose the more desirable younger, lower N count women, and the high N count women will have to settle for betas who will provide for them
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 11:39 PM
15

A primal disgust, a repulsiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 11:38 PM
6

The pairing is indeed a bad idea, but at this point the girl is usually low value, and settles for a beta provider, as it is only him that is scarce enough in his options to lock her down
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 11:37 PM
2

Are you male and her female?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 10:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter