TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

theonusta Archive

View 0 posts and 33 comments by theonusta on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

The older I get, the more I find that generally - people do not have loving, happy, fulfilling relationships....they seem to hang on for dear life even if no one is happy anymore and it's miserable because they tick of boxes as a means of feeling involved or of achieving "success". Feeling blue, get a partner - still unhappy, get married - uncomfortable with your life, have a child - resentful, suck it up....I never understood why people would settle for that kind of thing. You are not crazy, yo…
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:23 PM
3

You miss the point entirely.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 10:02 PM
14

This makes sense in that any partner in a sexual act can call it off at any time. Period. This includes if a condom breaks or was no longer in use. This includes if you change your mind, this includes if you are seconds from orgasm. It is a violation of a person's sexual rights to continue a sexual act once consent has been removed. And I would argue, that it can be considered rape.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 09:45 PM
2

This was a point...previously was just name calling. Look no one is trying to force men to do anything. They are however, trying to make corporations recognize that there are men who want to take some of the child rearing burden and they shouldn't be punished for that. Some men (and some corporations) have taken it upon themselves to take things like paternity leave, sick days or flex time to stay home with an ill child so that the mother doesn't have to stay down in her job. This can, unfortuna…
/r/MensRights14/07/10 10:59 PM
1

Yes, I am stating that biological differences (ie: ability to incubate and spit out child) do not mean that people are happy with those things alone. And while you find that the current state of affairs is "natural" I wholeheartedly disagree with you. I can't really discuss it with you since you refuse to see this from another persons perspective. But there are MANY men and women who find your "natural" state of affairs anything but. And shouldn't they be able to choose whatever lifestyle is nat…
/r/MensRights14/07/10 10:43 PM
2

What a brilliant point! You are allowed to disagree with me, but please try and make a point. Telling me to "fuck off" does fuck all with regards to your argument or the discussion at hand.
/r/MensRights14/07/10 09:39 PM
0

Biologically we are different yes, but that biological difference doesn't make it so that women don't desire to have more than one thing in life that fulfills them. Likewise the same is true in that men are allowed to find fulfillment in things besides their economic contribution. Are there men and women who are totally satisfied with these traditional roles? Of course. But there are many who are not and struggle with finding equality in their workplaces because of it. Men are not given the opti…
/r/MensRights14/07/10 09:37 PM
3

I don't think there are many people who really feel that it is equal. At least not in my experience. How is it equal for a woman to have to sacrifice her career in order to have a child? It takes two to make a baby and assuming that they have decided to have a child together, does it not make sense that they should equally contribute to the raising of that child including taking time off of work to stay home with a sick child, taking paternity leave. Don't assume that just because there is a fat…
/r/MensRights13/07/10 10:52 PM
-1

Literally, no. But I think the point of the phrase was to point out the dire circumstances of many men who feel forced to pay out child support that a court deems appropriate (sometimes enough to put them close to the poverty line) for a child they still have no rights to see or possibly didn't even want in the first place. Most states don't have any law requiring proof of paternity before awarding child support, and many won't even let such evidence be admitted. Several states, such as TX, have…
/r/MensRights13/07/10 08:42 PM
0

I don't think he's exaggerating. The majority of divorce cases sends a clear message that "being a father" only requires a check. And that check doesn't enable you to be a part of your child's life if you've pissed off your ex. So you are completely disposable as a father, a person, all the experiences and knowledge and the relationship you could have had with your kid are completely disposable. But not your money. Lord help you if you want more than that.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 08:20 PM
2

The idea is that if enough men take equal responsibility in their families, then it won't be seen as a handicap anymore. It will become accepted as a normal process that doesn't have to handicap anyone. But yes, it does require some immediate sacrifice on behalf of equality.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 08:18 PM
1

I AGREE! But you can' know about that until you investigate the claim. This guy wasn't arrested, he didn't get charged with anything, they investigated the claim against him. They found it to be false, she admitted it was false, they placed her on probation (in this case jail time would be more appropriate) and he was able to sue her for damages which he won. She did an awful thing, and has been punished. Is it fair or right? No. But he was able to get justice and I feel like this is a good thin…
/r/MensRights25/06/10 11:45 AM
1

I AGREE WITH YOU! I never said that accusations alone are enough for a trial or conviction, but an investigation - yes. An accusation of rape should always be investigated and if found to be a malicious fabrication the accuser should be punished. I was just pointing out that the lack of physical evidence shouldn't automatically rule out an investigation of the accusation because there are many reasons and ways in which a rape could have very little physical evidence and you would have to investi…
/r/MensRights25/06/10 11:36 AM
-3

Not all rape victims fight off the attacker so bruising and broken bones may not enter into the equation, similarly, vaginal tearing isn't always found. If the attacker uses a condom there would be less chance of seminal fluid or pubic hair. And psychological trauma doesn't happen for everyone immediatly following the event. Many people shut down to the point that they choose to believe it's a dream or that it happened to someone else as a means of surviving. And that's if the victim isn't so fr…
/r/MensRights24/06/10 09:20 PM
-6

Rape doesn't always leave physical or eye witness evidence. The threat is potent, and should be investigated. But in the case where the evidence isn't there and a false allegation has been maliciously used then retribution for lost wages/pain & suffering/etc. should be allowed. I'm glad to see they took his claim seriously and that he won the damages due to him.
/r/MensRights24/06/10 04:14 PM
3

Embryo's are not automatically viable. They have to implant in order to be viable. Women flush out non-viable embryos all the time...you'd never even know if you did.
/r/MensRights18/05/10 09:09 PM
1

Having gone to a woman's university with a required women's studies course and several woman's studies emphasis' - the attitude of those courses is very anti-male. They have a very anti-male pro-feminist agenda that is at the root of the courses themselves. So the idea that women's studies is somehow pure it it's motives is utterly ridiculous. In my experiences, courses in women's studies espouses figures and facts that have long been disproved or re contextualized as feminism has grown. Women a…
/r/MensRights12/04/10 05:45 PM
6

I'm so glad people are recognizing that this can happen. I was a child who had "suppressed memories" that were not real - but false statements pounded into my head by a bad therapist. Thankfully, the authorities found it to be baseless and from that foothold, I was able to find what was true again. It is something I still struggle with.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 07:55 PM
3

Can you get to them? Could you take emergency vacation time from work and fly to them? At the very least call them and let them know. You need a support system....I mean we're all here for you, but certainly your mom would want to know, your brother/sister, your dad? You don't have to go through this alone and the first step to dealing with this is breaking that silence! You have to tell people close to you....although your boss doesn't need to know anything more than you have a family emergency…
/r/MensRights16/03/10 09:11 PM
3

You need to call your counselor and tell them that this abuse is ongoing, that you fear for yourself and your children's safety. They are bound by law to report what they know and they should have access to a network to get you and your kids out of the house. You are not weak, you need to get out of there quickly. Do you have family or friends you could stay with? Maybe Grandma could come by and take the kids out for lunch and a movie and just not bring them home until after you are with them an…
/r/MensRights16/03/10 09:00 PM
3

Things such as pregnancy and having a family shouldn't be a hindrance to either gender. However, in the current system women are the primary care-givers and therefore lose out on promotions, raises, extra projects that would put them on equal footing with men who don't have the familial responsibilities as well as their jobs. This has NOTHING to do with a man's (arguably) "natural ability" to Physically and mentally imposing aswell as being highly competitive men excel at these rolls as is shown…
/r/MensRights15/03/10 07:42 PM
8

Niiiice. Yes, lets disparage women who are lesbians as being ugly or semi-crazy feminists forced into a "choice". Because sexuality automatically defines a person, right? And because what kind of woman would be a lesbian when she could get that cock? You and Afungi and the aptly named offensive_brute need to take that kind of hateful rhetoric away from the Men's Rights or Feminist movements. It should have no place here.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 06:19 PM
9

Who wants happy accidents?!? I don't! None of the women I know do! We all take great care to prevent accidents!
/r/MensRights18/02/10 06:58 PM
8

I had the same reaction. Who are these people that don't discuss things like future children and think their partners don't know what they want?!? I can't get off my birth control because of endometriosis, but if I could, why not have both people make their own choices about their own bodies. If I as a woman don't want to have kids, I get on birth control. If a man doesn't want to father kids, he could get on birth control. Talk about your choices, but don't try to force his hand because you hav…
/r/MensRights18/02/10 06:50 PM
3

I love how the author of the article completely bypasses that there is a reason for the mother taking the time off of work or working less to take on the second shift....men are socially not able to do so. In my experiences, women are expected to pick up a sick child, take the day off to go to the doctor with them, not stay late in order to go to the plays and events. Men are no expected to do this, in fact if they were to do this, they would notice that they didn't get raises or promotions or e…
/r/MensRights08/02/10 03:19 PM
3

If the average sentence served for a rape is 5.4 years (disgusting, but not the topic) and this woman would serve 3.5 years, that is a hefty chunk of that sentence to begin with. But more to the point, while I agree with all the things you say about the credibility damage, the life issues of being falsely accused, the importance of credibility in actual convictions...I have to disagree with the idea that people who cry rape are equal to those who actually do rape. This is a different crime than …
/r/MensRights29/01/10 10:34 PM
3

3 and 1/2 years is nothing to sneeze at. I think this should perhaps be per false claim that was investigated...but it's a long time.
/r/MensRights29/01/10 09:56 PM
4

Really? I'm all for punishment that fits the crime...but locking her up for the possible sentences of those men? I don't think that is a fair option. How about suing her for defamation, lost wages, damages, and emotional stress? How about a three strikes law? How about an actual sentencing guideline for this kind of crime....but you and I both know that locking her up for that amount of time would be cruel and unusual punishment under our laws.
/r/MensRights29/01/10 09:55 PM
5

So, this has obviously got to change. My understanding is that if a law is unjust, the law must be challenged. So how do we do this? And what role should women play in tying to help? I'm from a divorced home and have seen the effects when a woman is left penniless from a divorce with two young children and no job skills. I know this was the intent of child-support, to mitigate the cost of raising children and to recognize that it takes two to tango - as the saying goes. However, women ultimately…
/r/MensRights22/01/10 10:29 PM
14

No, violence against anyone is assault and should be treated as such. NO ONE deserves to take abuse because they need to "toughen up". The woman in question behaved in a violent way, in public, to demean and cause pain to her (ex) finance. There is no difference between who is hitting who. Both are unacceptable and as women, if we want real equality, we have to stop demanding that things happening to women by men are atrocious while the exact same things happening to men by women are acceptable.…
/r/MensRights08/01/10 06:50 PM
2

Yes, I was referring to the ERA that got shot down. The EEOC does protect against sex discrimination however and that is a blessing, but it's often not enforced due to the agency being overwhelmed and underfunded. I'm not sure on the dollar for dollar. I've read that this may be true on a case to case comparison but that in actuality, because women tend to care for the children even though the man is able and capable, the effects of taking the day off to take the sick child to the doctor, pickin…
/r/MensRights13/06/09 08:31 PM
0

As a feminist who supports human rights, and gives a shit about the problems both sexes face: Alimony can only be eliminated when women have equal ability to re-enter the workforce. This depends largely on the decision regarding custody as women with children earn 78% of what women without children earn, and that is only 78% of what a man would earn at the same job. I agree with you wholeheartedly on the division of property and child support payments. I think that any man fingered as the father…
/r/MensRights13/06/09 07:50 PM
1

The feminist movement was radical, but not really militant until the end of the second wave of feminism around the 1970's early 1980's. And even then it was a somewhat of a natural response to gaining a little bit of power and utilizing this to assuage the anger felt by many women over their previous oppression. The second wave of feminism focused on legislative action to enact changes. Truth be told, they were NOT successful. We still do not earn the same wages for the same job, we still are he…
/r/MensRights13/06/09 07:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter