thepufferfish Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	I think the widespread demonization of "objectification" is subtly a war against men. CMV Is it ridiculous to say that I can enjoy someone's body while still treating them as person with thoughts and feelings?	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/09/14 10:55 PM
9	I think the widespread demonization of "objectification" is subtly a war against men. CMV Really? Sharing naked photos means you want to be objectified? Are those really the only two options? As a dude, I know I'm fully capable of not objectifying the women sending me naked photos.	/r/PurplePillDebate	05/09/14 02:53 AM
2	Correlation, Causation, and Statistics Well, I considered it an assumption that TBP would also rely on the experiences of themselves and those who they consider successful. That's my mistake. Do you think they solely base their interactions on sociological and psychological studies and surveys? I'm under the impression that both sides use all the evidence available, fwiw. Just "TBP" doesn't exactly have set of rules on interaction. Also, I think it's curious you compare TRP to sales, because it seems people generally think of salesma…	/r/PurplePillDebate	03/09/14 02:58 AM
2	Correlation, Causation, and Statistics Fair enough. Nitpickers are ok in my book.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/09/14 09:08 PM
4	Correlation, Causation, and Statistics http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/proof evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth. anything serving as such evidence You said: [TRP is] more concerned with field reports and the collected wisdom of the ages. Compared to TBP, who "think sociological and psychological papers have the scientific weight of a chemical equation and represent "proof" and "disproof" of their contents without politics or ideology." It seems to me that you're saying anecdotal…	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/09/14 07:45 PM
2	Correlation, Causation, and Statistics We're not discussing mathematics or hard sciences, so forgive me for using the definition of "proof" in the context it was used. Edit: Obviously surveys must be taken with a ton of salt, but shouldn't anecdotes be taken with an equal amount of salt? That's the point I'm trying to get at, that the field reports and "collected wisdom of the ages" deserve the same amount of scrutiny.	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/09/14 07:40 PM
5	Correlation, Causation, and Statistics You do realize that's the literal definition of proof? And aren't studies better supporting evidence than anecdotes?	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/09/14 07:16 PM
6	Correlation, Causation, and Statistics So you're saying the anecdotal evidence posted on TRP and "the collected wisdom of the ages" (because when has that ever been proven wrong?) better represents the truth than any research? Never mind that you admit that those who do put weight into science will freely change their opinion in light of newer, contradicting evidence?	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/09/14 05:24 PM
4	Correlation, Causation, and Statistics Can you explain, then, where bio-truths come from?	/r/PurplePillDebate	02/09/14 05:18 PM
12	BP Men, you have ever worked in a predominantly male work environment? That's a tremendous leap in logic. I also think Cosmo sounds immature and cringeworthy, so I must want to police the magazine, right?	/r/PurplePillDebate	01/09/14 12:38 AM
5	Why do some TRPers not understand the way outsiders view them But then again, they do feel free to moderate and tone down the their words in the subreddit to be more "TRP correct."	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/14 09:05 PM
13	BP Men, you have ever worked in a predominantly male work environment? How do you make the jump from it "sounds immature and cringe worthy" to "should male spaces be policed"?	/r/PurplePillDebate	31/08/14 09:01 PM