TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thereyouwent Archive

View 16 posts and 58 comments by thereyouwent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
30

Blogs/Videothereyouwent/r/MensRights31/08/14 05:19 PM
25

thereyouwent/r/MensRights08/11/14 09:14 AM
24

Blogs/Videothereyouwent/r/MensRights28/10/14 08:56 AM
12

Blogs/Videothereyouwent/r/MensRights26/08/14 09:16 AM
10

Blogs/Videothereyouwent/r/MensRights09/11/14 06:32 AM
8

Blogs/Videothereyouwent/r/MensRights18/11/14 09:09 AM
5

Blogs/Videothereyouwent/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:33 AM
5

Discussionthereyouwent/r/MensRights01/11/14 01:38 AM
3

Blogs/Videothereyouwent/r/MensRights09/11/14 08:23 AM
3

Blogs/Videothereyouwent/r/MensRights09/09/14 07:05 AM
3

thereyouwent/r/MensRights01/11/14 05:00 AM
2

thereyouwent/r/MensRights01/11/14 02:52 AM
1

thereyouwent/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:44 AM
1

thereyouwent/r/MensRights01/11/14 12:56 AM
1

thereyouwent/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:08 AM
0

Storythereyouwent/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:09 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

k i haven't, got a link. I find the gynocentristic approach fascinating.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 04:44 PM
27

The term "kafkatrapping" describes a logical fallacy that is popular within gender feminism, racial politics and other ideologies of victimhood. It occurs when you are accused of a thought crime such as sexism, racism or homophobia. You respond with an honest denial, which is then used as further confirmation of your guilt. - See more at: http://www.thedailybell.com/editorials/35550/Wendy-McElroy-Beware-of-Kafkatrapping/#sthash.WnespAvb.dpuf
/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:31 AM
1

I'm doing the same with Trump. Even though I think that if it was Hilary vs Trump on policy particularly the TPP I would vote Trump. Anyone else I'd go ticket dem even though i don't like the Clintons.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:30 AM
1

It is really disheartening that people are not aware of things like this that were not only reported on but leaked during the stratfor hack http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/12/13/wikileaks.investigation/ http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/wikileaks-stratfor-emails-a-secret-indictment-against-assange-20120228
/r/MensRights14/08/15 02:03 PM
2

millers crossing
/r/MensRights28/07/15 03:15 AM
1

Protest is not trolling. Blue Oyster Bertha clearly is an authoritarian and seeks to shut out voices.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:51 PM
3

or their sanctimonious family values campaigns and constitutional amendments against gay rights. Where do you think these male gender stereo types of the deadbeat dad and the man up crap come from. It is just gynocentrism from the right as their manginas get up and pose for who can be the best provider for their woman. It is liberal values that protect individual rights.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:50 AM
3

it is identity politics and the right has just chosen christian / religion as their victim identity. should i remind you of the war on christmas every year. Or Palin berating people for using the word retard.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:46 AM
2

the dangers of identity politics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ac6zDnK4ov4
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:34 PM
2

Same old feminism dressed up nice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIQnUFon2bA
/r/MensRights09/11/14 10:20 PM
1

yeah, pretty much.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 03:10 PM
6

http://www.quickmeme.com/img/a1/a13d2e2938612adaa9d48df7512f94cc9d863586ee7ac03f98713389c5bf2fb0.jpg
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:20 PM
2

One of the best articles on this i have read so far
/r/MensRights02/11/14 06:01 AM
3

colbert did this softball after the # cancelcolbert first assault on him.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:29 AM
0

I like a Jim Webb/Elizabeth Warren ticket. Elizabeth Warren would be a great VP candidate.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:15 AM
0

I like a Jim Webb/Elizabeth Warren ticket
/r/MensRights26/10/14 03:14 AM
1

linked through Columbia university paper and referenced in comments and mattress girl didn't go out with him for two semesters like girl two and she didn't accuse him of just kissing her and being rejected like girl three. girl three never completed filing grievance and girl two didn't say anything until she met mattress girl.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:01 AM
2

he participated in the school process and was not punished ( probably on threat of expulsion if he didn't participate and probably incriminated himself if he had to defend himself in court later)
/r/MensRights09/09/14 04:49 PM
0

She is upset that she didn't get her way and how the campus system works. BTW it is telling that the Columbia School of law is the only part of Columbia which declined using this system ( which was voted on apparently). Her and the guy had had sex two times before, in the midst of the third consensual time he allegedly held her down and penetrated her anally. He had been drinking(drunk) she had not( if a guy did this he'd be guilty of rape under consent rules dehydrated or not). She says she obj…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 07:00 AM
3

do you dude!
/r/MensRights06/09/14 05:36 AM
1

That's pretty brave but not nearly as brave as carrying a mattress to class
/r/MensRights06/09/14 04:48 AM
1

gotcha
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:32 AM
1

it is public knowledge now and covered in other press.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 06:11 AM
2

These are all just opinions but here we go before i left madison, in my "arguments" or online debates with my Madison friends there was initially a good bit of acknowledgement of men's rights as an ally but the Elliot Rogers and the subsequent media blitz worked pretty well for them. reference points for longtime madison activists ( and a good template for talking about the current censorship tactics ) will be the David Horowitz response from the UW ( http://www.wpri.org/WIInterest/McDade10.2.pd…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 04:28 PM
1

holy shit I lived in madison for years good luck. You will need it , after Scott Walker the radicalization is extreme. The overwhelming impact of his policies has fallen on women who have been the first ranks of getting organized and feel that they are in a pressure cooker. Unfortunately no men's groups at the beginning and the lack of state democratic political machine has made it a much more cultural battle than it needed to be and the feminists have been allowed to run wild by conflating men'…
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:48 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKmy5OKg6lo at about 19:00
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:58 PM
1

what about the saps she defrauded with the rebel jam donations going to her personal paypal account? What about the tips to help her after her "mugging" ?
/r/MensRights26/08/14 10:29 PM
20

http://i.imgur.com/E3o94Se.jpg
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:59 AM
28

there's a good chance the doxxiong was faked..again.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:04 AM
1

not to mention her more than likely fake mugging.
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:40 AM
3

she says she did in the chat logs
/r/MensRights22/08/14 06:31 AM
1

then we can all agree that most republicans are actually neo liberals
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:54 AM
1

how about the fact that the guy she ran against a guy who thought women's bodies had a way to "shut that whole thing down".
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:53 AM
2

if a woman does it it is theft apparently, if the government taxes that's unconstitutional theft, but if a guy just sits around and extracts money from the economy without adding anything to it it is a brave and valiant blow against the socialist overlords. The refusal to see the immorality of a system that spreads the burden of it's risk taking to the entire society while insisting that when that society demands to benefit it is theft. Any regulation to limit that risk exposure is met with outr…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:30 AM
1

Just to make the argument since you somehow consider proposed legally passed taxes ( or sunset cuts lapsing) and policies of growth through public infrastructure spending theft. Both of which were clearly articulated by the president while running for office so it is not as if he snuck them in there. I have a feeling you are a great example of the whole "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it." Usury- http://en.wikipedia.org/wik…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:19 AM
1

Unlimited greed is not a conservative value. Why is MR infested with partisan hacks? There are subs for your political rants.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:03 AM
2

Taxes are not stealing. Persecution complex much? The president talked about tax policy during an election and told the truth and you want to keep being lied to by the republicans handing out tax cuts and subsidies while building hospitals in Iraq ( none of which is free). Sorry that you lost the election but the republican's policies are repellent to poor people, they have done fuck all to create jobs when they ran on doing just that. And we live in a country that has more and more poor people.…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:57 AM
1

How is it not thier money when it part of thier wages
/r/MensRights09/07/14 12:11 AM
3

Absolutely great video. I wish i could send it back in time to many people i know now that I am getting older. I wonder if it would be possible to get something similar but not with the MR focus. One of the things I see, even though i have found the men's rights perspective persuasive for years, is the assumption that somehow men's rights is an extension of the republican party or the political christian conservative movement. Many of the roles and policies that i see MR consider objectionable s…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 12:54 AM
2

Yet no one in the entire build up and negotiation in congress saw that as a problem. One more reason for single payer or a public option. Too bad obama spent a year trying to appease republicans with this neo liberal market approach stumbling. Of course how was he to know that this congresss would decide to pass the least bills in the history of the country? Even if you wanted to fix that you would need legislative action as stipulated by the supreme court in the most recent decision. I think we…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 09:19 PM
1

In The Road to Serfdom, Hayek argued that "Economic control is not merely control of a sector of human life which can be separated from the rest; it is the control of the means for all our ends." so forgive me for not feeling happy about the court giving more to corporations at the expenses of individual freedom.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:00 PM
1

i can see that conservatives fervently hope this ends it, but really we will just end up with single payer. At the very least we will get a public option. But the idea that you get out of paying taxes for things you don't agree with in the law on religious grounds is a new precedent and overturns generations of case law. Why should Hobby Lobby get access to the insurance market and any tax credits. i'm fine with them not getting penalized, fair enough, but the birth control parts save money and …
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:32 AM
1

it's not their money once someone else earns it. The healthcare is not theirs. Who cares about chick filet and all that other shit? What's your point? Also it is not as if the ACA forbids fertility treatment Does the ACA cover infertility treatments? The ACA does not require coverage for infertility treatments. The ACA does require coverage of essential health benefits and allows states to define essential health benefits by selecting a benchmark plan from current employer offerings. Coverage of…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:46 AM
1

Yes i can tell how they decided to be so cautious. http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-expanded-hobby-lobby-20140702-column.html#page=1 This is about competing freedoms and individual freedom lost in my opinion. I grew up protestant though i am not religious and there is nothing morally wrong with birthcontrol. The idea that whatever religious sect that the boss is determines what medical care I can buy with my money is preposterous. Also this is just so that they get the subsidized…
/r/MensRights03/07/14 05:04 AM
1

yep looks like a public option or single payer. All we have to do is win the house back to change the legislation. Too bad the republicans won't help. Don't get why since there are plenty of protestants in the party.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:57 AM
1

Oh looky looky, in one day they expanded it to cover whatever anyone decides is against their religion. http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-expanded-hobby-lobby-20140702-column.html#page=1 Kinda looks like your wrong. Oh and before hobby lobby's insurance that they paid for covered these types of birth control. http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/jul/01/sally-kohn/did-hobby-lobby-once-provide-birth-control-coverag/ Of course employees paid for it since insurance is …
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:43 AM
1

oh look , like the voting rights decision and the ACA ruling , they give their republican allies a big negotiating tool to use to get tax breaks.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:39 AM
1

http://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/Sivin.pdf
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:33 AM
1

OH look the catholic reporter says " The reality is that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that the IUD and Plan B work only as contraceptives. " http://ncronline.org/blogs/grace-margins/what-abortifacient-and-what-it-isnt
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:29 AM
1

no it is not. Here is the amicus brief explaining why it isn't http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/13-354-BRIEF-OF-AMICI-CURIAE-PHYSICIANS-FOR-REPRODUCTIVE-HEALTH-et-al....pdf
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:26 AM
2

The IUD and Plan B are not aborticides so the fact is that their religious objections were allowed to trump science and law at the expense of thier employees. It is the same kind of redefinition that was attempted and has failed in multiple person hood amendments in several states at the ballot box. If Hobby Lobby didn't want to follow the law then they should lose the tax benefits and subsidies they are going to receive from the government. I don't feel obligated to provide subsidized prices fo…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 08:06 AM
1

If there is no reason really to treat birth control any differently than any sort of other elective thing or another that insurance may or may not cover then why did they specifically not address the vast majority of birth control options and limit the scope of the ruling to just four types that were objectionable to the greene family? The IUD and plan B are not significantly different than the pill which was most certainly not effected by this ruling. the reason they were excluded is because th…
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:43 AM
1

yeah, someone's religion let's them get out of paying taxes , no way that will ever be abused. BTW birthcontrol is not subjected to the ruling according to the majority opinion. However IUDs and Plan B is. It is about what they consider aborticides no matter that IUDs and Plan B both operate to disrupt birth after insemination as the Pill does. Besides the fact that Hobby Lobby's insurance before the case payed for these things it kinda makes it about what someone's religious convictions tell th…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 09:27 PM
1

I am straight but I don't see making the tent smaller as a positive thing. Gender liberation and confronting the sexist expectations of society is part of what the men's rights conversation is about ( I.e. it is not a patriarchy, gender roles are a collaborative creation of both men and women). The OP had nothing about being gay in it yet the assumption made was that the sub suggested about acting outside of traditional gender roles would be gay and also a way to get rid of gay men. I don't see …
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:20 AM
2

sounds like a pretty good reason not to do it then since I don't really see them being "sheparded" out as a positive development. It is men's rights , not straight guys rights. If so many male gay leaders had not died in the 80's then the gender debate might be a lot more fair and situations like the Pride event in Toronto would probably not be happening.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 05:06 AM
1

god i saw this on facebook earlier and thought the same thing.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 03:18 AM
1

the problem with the intro is the reliance on civil procedures and the outrage at the college for not expelling the alleged perpetrators of the assault. If rape is going to be addressed then men and women have to treat it like a crime and go to the criminal justice system. Why should adult women be protecting these rapists by keeping them within some fake academic kangaroo court? Also the alleged incident happened off campus while school was off. What jurisdiction does the school even have if th…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 09:49 AM
1

At the universities, students preventing other students from attending an invited lecturer who is not advocating violence should be punished for violating the campus academic code. This should be enforced.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 02:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter