TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thesilentchief Archive

View 5 posts and 282 comments by thesilentchief on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Context?
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:45 AM
9

Was it because of his one weird trick?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 06:11 AM
2

I'm pretty sure the vast majority of women won't even think to get their haircuts at barbershops for fear of not getting what they want. In this case, the woman wanted a men's style style haircut and smartly thought the best place to do that would be a place that specializes in men's styles. I'm totally unsympathetic to the owner's explanation that serving a woman is "infringing on our environment." If you were denied service anywhere on the basis of your sex, even if the service offered was typ…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:43 AM
1

Not sure why someone downvoted you, you're correct. Getting sick of the lack of self awareness on this sub.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:32 AM
2

This is paranoid delusion.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:27 AM
5

Jesus, that's awful. They're literally giving other people free leash to treat other people poorly with no expectation of a negative consequence. I hate this shit.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:26 PM
1

control testosterone
/r/MensRights31/07/15 06:54 AM
2

Thank you for sharing this.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:02 AM
–

Posts like these are why I'm embarrassed to be here. Take this unscientific, irrational shit back to /r/theredpill, please.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:59 AM
9

I've always found being a gay man to be a strangely fortunate thing in our times. My sexuality isn't constantly being put to shame by SJW bigots (only conservative bigots, whose opinions are hilariously malformed on this topic). If I were a straight guy, I'd tire of being called sexist/"gross" because I prefer a kind of woman, or because I ventured an opinion in a private conversation about how a girl looks. Basically, for publicly acknowledging that my sexuality exists. As a gay guy, I can sham…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 06:28 PM
–

Social conservatives deserve to be made fun of.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:04 AM
0

What will it take to get you to leave this sub?
/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:09 AM
5

Everyone here should read this article. I haven't yet seen someone who so keenly grasps what post-wave feminism has become: a cloak used to reintroduce regressive schools of thought back into all aspects of government and culture. This is why there's a split between egalitarians like C. H. Sommers and modern feminists. One side values enlightenment ideals, one despises them. This is bar none the best "big picture" article I've read about the feminist/SJW reactionary phenomenon.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 04:31 AM
1

Everyday Feminism is the craziest of the crazy. Completely on par with what you'd expect to read on an SJW's Tumblr. It's depressing how many people on my social networking feeds share links to it. For example.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:38 AM
1

Interesting. You and I are in very different political climates though (Texas here), so that may explain some of it. My community college experience thus far has been great. The SJW stuff has crept into some of our larger universities (UT, University of North Texas) but my local community college was spared. Anecdotes on all sides of course. Thanks for your response.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:19 AM
2

Curious opinion. What makes you say that?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 10:35 PM
4

Of both sexes, yes. Not of only one. But if you care more about the "rights" part of men's rights I think you should find conscription abhorrent by itself.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 08:26 PM
–

Don't read the comments. "Hurr durr they're not men, they're hipsters! They'll learn what it's like to be a man! Take some pride in serving your country." Never thought I'd see people publicly cheer on slavery, but as with most things concerning men's rights and their basic human dignity, I'm continually shocked by others' antipathy to the subject.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:02 AM
1

?? Fucking dropped. Joking aside, this was obviously written by a crazy person.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 08:27 AM
–

Fuck that. Conscription is slavery, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 08:32 AM
2

It's not our job to judge how others do their thing. That's bogus. You make excuse for gross violations to human rights and human dignity by saying that. "They mutilate their kids? Who are we to judge? They execute their gays? That's just their culture!" No. There is no excuse for this shit. It is unreasonable, superstitious, disgraceful and ruins people's live.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:17 AM
5

You misunderstand! This is patriarchy backfiring! I don't know how, but it is!
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:41 PM
1

That's reading a little far into what was obviously a joke, but here's this just for fun.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 11:35 PM
1

I don't know what to tell you if you honestly believe the men's rights movement is leading to female supremacy. That's pure ridiculousness. Looking through your posting history it's clear you're a terper, too. There's been a trend of terpers saying batshit crazy things in this thread, I wonder why that could possibly be. TRP is fucking poison.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:12 AM
3

I don't understand. OP seems completely correct in this situation.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:13 PM
–

One is a group of censorious, sexually repressive fanatics who react violently to any criticism of their cause, the other believes Mohammed flew on a horse.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:44 PM
2

Yeah /r/mensrights is just such a feminist, SJW hellhole right now. Your post is as unhinged as everything /u/pornography_saves_li has said.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:01 PM
2

They might be morons with terrible arguments, but they're masters of rhetoric, and they have the art of sounding reasonable down to a science.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:48 AM
1

I'm not sure if I can support removing comments, either. It's definitely a dilemma. But there needs to be some sort of action taken that discourages that sort of bullshit here.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:28 AM
1

I would definitely like to see links to ROK banned.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:13 AM
4

#alphaproblems #justalphathings
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:01 AM
2

That's not surprising. Reading anything on that site makes me feel rotten to the core. I feel like I'm reading honeyed words of a sociopath who wants me to join his cult.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:59 AM
2

Perfect example of the good old horseshoe. An extremely liberal person arguing against gay marriage, just like an extreme conservative.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:48 AM
1

I'm sure that's some kind of insult. I don't really care. You're irrelevant. Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:40 AM
1

Being slightly less retarded than you.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:31 AM
1

You're basically suggesting a duel. This is hilarious. The answer is no. You can call me a gamma male all you like, I don't care enough about you to argue face to face. Frankly I think it's strange you want to.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:30 AM
2

It's not my job to educate you, shitlord! Now who's the SJW?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:24 AM
1

Who are those people? What forums do they take place in? So far even people who have made capitulations to TRP have been met with abuse from you. I don't believe you for one second.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:21 AM
1

You expect me to believe that you have the ability to argue better, but you're just choosing not to?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:19 AM
1

The last thing I plan to do is expose my personal information to a probable psychopath. If you think you need a different venue in order to argue more effectively then your arguments probably aren't very good. Spare me this machismo bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:17 AM
2

I've counted four thus far, but yes. Everyone who has disagreed with you.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:13 AM
1

And if you dont, or are afraid to say your shit in an environment you may be publicly proven wrong in You mean, like Reddit? Like the forum we're already fucking talking on?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:10 AM
2

Literally every single fucking person in this thread who has disagreed with you has been subject to abuse from you. Literally every fucking person.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:05 AM
1

say that to my face fucker not online see what happens That's basically what you just said. You're a cliche. A bad meme.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:04 AM
2

Encourages everyone to think for themselves. Insults and belittles everyone who disagrees with him.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 06:02 AM
1

If anyone's serving as a lesson, it's you. TRP, everyone. This is what TRP looks like.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:58 AM
1

So you're not willing to provide evidence. Cool. You're an arrogant piece of shit if you think any of your claims are self-evident.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:52 AM
0

I was only pretending to be retarded! Hurr durr. No.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:51 AM
0

And what damage is that?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:49 AM
2

That's exactly what they did. Also, the media always uses Return of Kings against us, even though ROK is redpill.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:48 AM
4

Yeah, it's really disgusting that the modern MRM is brimming with young (and old) egalitarians who want to work with all people to help end gender related inequalities. Truly, a shameful thing to be a part of. If you are any indication of what the old guard looks like then I cannot ask you to hasten your exit from the movement fast enough.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:47 AM
0

If only we had one so I can show him with I mean!
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:43 AM
1

By the way, I'm a homosexual man. Your idiotic hierarchy of alpha-gamma doesn't even fucking apply to me. Eat shit.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:41 AM
2

I didn't notice it because you haven't done it. You have done absolutely nothing to demonstrate that anyone who disagrees with you is either a bigot or an SJW.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:35 AM
2

Your educational background means jack shit, chief. So why did you bring it up, you tremendous fucking retard?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:33 AM
1

Show me this so-called bigoted shit. Show me and everyone else who disagreed with you how we're SJWs.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:32 AM
2

There's huge crossover in terms of subscribers. We share more subscribers with TRP than we do /r/tumblrinaction. And I contest they won't help a lonely man. They'll give him bad advice and tell him that women aren't his friend.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:30 AM
2

I don't know what's funnier: the fact that you think I'm supposed to be offended by your terper terminology, or the fact that you can't appreciate the irony of criticizing my educational background when you are so completely fucking incoherent.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:09 AM
2

No, that's exactly what your position is. You started lashing out as soon as people started disagreeing with you. At the first sign of disagreement you called everyone an SJW.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:06 AM
1

You're right. Because it's mostly typos and totally unintelligible. That's why I can't understand it.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 05:00 AM
1

I'm sorry you think it was rhetorical.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:59 AM
1

You're literally talking gibberish right now.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:58 AM
1

because your whole life you've been forced to quietly seethe while 'lesser' men gained rewards you felt you were entitled to Unlike terpers, I don't have an entitlement complex, so no. You accomplish nothing in life, but are quick to jump a bandwagon and claim to be a voice for the majority. Yes, that's why I advocate for the MRM. Because the MRM represents the majority opinion in the US.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:53 AM
1

So who exactly is the censorious information limiting cult like assholes in this ituation, O you think? You, obviously.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:45 AM
2

If only that were the case. I'm pretty sure they want more of us to jump ship. I don't think they're here due to a sudden collective pang of altruism.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:39 AM
1

You are indistinguishable from the mindset that evicted the HBB from Calgary Expo. As in, there is zero difference between your intolerant demands or confrmity, and toss of the motivation rabid feminist SJW. That's a bold claim considering how very little I've said to you. Where do you get any of this from? I invite you to look through my post history. You will find no evidence to support anything you've said. In fact you will find vast evidence to the contrary. I hate censorship. If I opposed H…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:37 AM
4

Seriously. TRP is the manifestation of every strawman leveled against the MRM. Every bad thing you hear about us? That's TRP.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:32 AM
1

Not 'equality', equal treatment before the law. So... equality. You are talking nonsense.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:30 AM
–

The greatest argument against TRP is its front page. Doesn't matter what time of day.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:26 AM
1

Please tell me how I represent a totalitarian mindset, or how I in any imaginable way fit the description of "thought police." Am I telling you what you can't say? Blacklisting you? Trying to censor you? I'm arguing with you, you humongous fucking nitwit. I've gotten so used to be accused of being a radical for being even remotely involved with the MRM I've forgotten what real radicals on our side look like. You are 100% irrational. Gamma boy. lol I'm so offended.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:25 AM
4

I'm ashamed to see that most others ITT don't. The crossover between /r/mensrights and /r/theredpill is embarrassing.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:22 AM
–

Please, tell me how I'm a shitlord SJW. You literally just implied that egalitarianism is bad. If you actually believe that you are a bona fide bigot, full stop.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 04:20 AM
–

And of course, being non egalitarian would make you the Shittiest Man In The World. It would by definition mean that you believe in the supremacy/inferiority of one sex over another. Thank you for highlighting your bigotry for everyone to see.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:35 AM
6

I'm not an SJW. I think that's the first time anyone has accused me of that. Opposing genuine, undisguised sexism does not a social justice warrior make. If stamping out sexism is a goal of men's rights, then that means stamping out you. /r/redpill is a sexist cesspit, it is anathema to the MRM. Make no mistake: you make us look bad. You give the mainstream media ammunition against us. And I don't oppose "scary ideas." I oppose you, specifically, redirecting a sexually frustrated man into a den …
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:32 AM
3

Listening to it. So far Fite has made them look like fools since they're obviously not taking him seriously. He stuttered a bit when it came to the draft but he was still very strong there. I cannot believe that his opposition used the Clintonian "women are the primary victims of war," nor can I believe that, as Fite said, someone actually tried to joke about infant genital mutilation. One person is arguing like a humanitarian, one is arguing like a politician. Edit: thirty minutes in. They're m…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 01:05 AM
13

Feminism has a history of homophobia. Radicals of the second wave believed gay men were just men who were so misogynistic that they turned to other men instead. They also damaged lesbians with the concept of "political lesbianism," ie women "choosing" to be gay in order to avoid getting in bed with the enemy. This of course only hurts gay people by giving credit to the statement that homosexuality is choice. Now, the third wave tells us that we're more privileged than lesbians because male privi…
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:32 AM
–

This the worst imaginable advice to give to a sexually frustrated man. Or any person, actually. /r/redpill is totally and unashamedly sexist, and will make you hate yourself and other women. Seriously OP, look at their front page and tell yourself that's a community you want to be a part of. Fuck that. And fuck you, /u/Pornography_saves_li, this is a disgustingly opportunistic abuse to OP. Shame on you.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 12:18 AM
0

People say it a lot here. Sorry I jumped the gun in my response.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 04:02 AM
0

Tallwheel's post was in response to mine about Sommers.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:54 AM
2

Shitposting? She's been doing this for 20+ years.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:45 AM
3

It's answered by the fact that she still self identifies as a feminist and advocates for gender quality. If you really want that person who says that "actually makes her an egalitarian" you're no different from the feminists who insist that anyone who cares for gender equality is "actually a feminist." Seriously. Stop stressing about the label and pay attention to her convictions.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:42 AM
4

And they did. And she still self-identifies as a feminist. As you said, it's not like any agency has control over the word, as much as they'd like to.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 03:39 AM
8

This is a point that has been raised and answered repeatedly. She's a feminist.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:06 AM
6

Seriously mate.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 01:05 AM
2

No advice animals or other low-effort image or text posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 12:02 AM
–

I think this counts as a low effort post. Christina Hoff Sommers still uses the handle of feminist, as do other people with respectable views on gender equality. It's not the label that matters, it's what the person says and does.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 10:07 PM
1

I generally agree. I also agree with people who choose to live without the opposite sex, that's their choice to make. However, we're not going to get what we want by exiting the "fight" altogether. All that does is give them the freedom to expand their abuse with no challenger to put them in place.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:25 PM
6

It's amazing how many people change their views when they have a son. Not saying this author was ever a bigot, but I've watched it happen.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:13 PM
3

I mean let's be clear, these people are all liberal to a man. I do agree it's not correct to conflate being liberal with this, but it's great ammunition for a dishonest right-wing press. It may not be accurate, but I internally categorize the social justice types as being our version of the Tea Party. Maybe it's a false equivalency, but it helps me sleep at night.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:11 PM
4

Sounds like fat shaming to me!
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:40 AM
4

Literally Orwell.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 05:20 AM
14

... And I don't know about you, but I'm hoping that it stays banned. That is a totally evil thing to do against another human being.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:25 AM
3

Yeah, I'll admit right off that when I watch most every other video on AEI's channel I'm fairly suspicious. But Sommers has proven herself time and again to be someone who is genuinely concerned with equality of the sexes. Again, I'd encourage you to watch some of her lectures or interviews from other forums. I think she was on Fresh Air (I may be mistaken) with Terry Gross a year or two ago, which is a very good radio program on NPR in the US.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 03:19 AM
2

I identify as generally liberal as well, just for the record. American Enterprise Institute is center-right, but Sommers has routinely affirmed that she is a Democrat with libertarian leanings. She is still currently a registered Dem, I believe. Furthermore, everything she says and advocates for is in keeping with those principles. The "She's just part of a conservative think tank!" argument is used very frequently by her opponents, so I'm not surprised you've encountered it. AEI might be right …
/r/MensRights02/04/15 02:56 AM
3

If you've never heard of Christina Hoff Sommers before now you owe it to yourself to watch some of her lectures, or read some of her books. One of the most reasonable and ethical people you will ever hear speak. It's amazing how anyone could have an issue with anything she says, but she is absolutely despised by radfems.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 11:19 PM
4

"Accusations of male bashing and man hating work to discredit feminism because people often confuse men as individuals with men as a dominant and privileged category of people. Given the reality of women's oppression, male privilege, and some men's enforcement of both, it's hardly surprising that EVERY woman should have moments when she resents or even "hates" men.” This is how holocausts happen. Sorry if that sounds extreme. This just makes me so angry. We think we've come so far as a people an…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:01 AM
6

She had become famous in the early 1980s for the ordinance that she and the legal scholar Catharine MacKinnon had drafted for Minneapolis, recognising pornography as sex discrimination and a violation of women’s civil rights. So. Denying women's agency, and their right to participate in an industry. Interestingly, men are not also considered victims, and gay porn isn't even considered. So much bigotry, so many double standards, all in once sentence. What an admirable person! “The libertarians ar…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:25 AM
12

Don't feminists fucking routinely try to tell us that they don't take people like Dworkin seriously anymore? And here we find ourselves. Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:18 AM
11

Sexism against men is real, women-people. If you see something, say something. I don't understand... this is statement is correct. Why is it being said with sarcasm? How have we gotten to a point where this statement is supposed to be perceived as a joke? This is the sort of thing that just makes me blankly stare at a wall for an hour and think about what future can possibly come from this sort of belief.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:32 AM
3

The high percentage of bachelors means bleak prospects for millions of young women who dream about a wedding day that may never come. “It’s very, very depressing,” Crouse told CNSNews.com. If this isn't privilege, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 03:13 AM
1

AEI is a conservative think tank!
/r/MensRights30/03/15 01:00 AM
1

You exaggerate. It's more like five seconds.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:11 PM
8

It doesn't even matter that this was written anonymously, the fact that it was published is a very poor reflection of them. The writer's words are plainly sexist and racist. This is what happens when you tell people that they can't be racist/sexist toward another group of people: they engage in it with no shame. This is why we'll always be closer to the truth than they will. Bigotry comes in all forms and extends in all directions. No one is immune to it.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 07:44 PM
12

Forget math and science, even saying that men are biologically predisposed to gain strength in greater proportion to their body weight than women is positively sexist.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 07:02 AM
6

My understanding is that girls' restrooms are actually far more disgusting than guys'. Need verification on that one.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:40 AM
3

I've been treated like shit by campus feminists because like 80% of women I'm 'just a breeder.' This is a term I see used a lot in the gay community too, it's an absolutely despicable way to refer to another human being.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:36 AM
14

What the hell does "non-consensual sexualization" mean? Are people supposed to ask permission to be attracted to other people now? This is fucking thought police territory. Also straight girls often put their hand all over gay guys. It goes both ways. Honestly, EveryDayFeminism is just rage bait.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 06:26 AM
1

IN 99% OF SEXUAL ASSAULTS, THE ACCUSED PERPETRATOR IS MALE. Source on this?
/r/MensRights07/03/15 06:38 AM
1

drop weights Please leave.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 01:12 AM
2

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Too bad it affects the rest of us.
/r/MensRights04/03/15 05:11 AM
11

I don't think I've ever seen one of these people try to address that argument, despite the fact that it's made pretty frequently.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:19 AM
2

Logan is now an adult in his final year of college, and beginning to interview for jobs after graduation. He always dresses well for his interviews, wearing a slimming outfit that makes him look both professional and attractive. As he navigates the city streets that he hopes will connect him to a future full of happiness and success, he passes by billboards and bus ads of men in G-strings with flawless, Photoshopped bodies. He barely notices them. As he mentally rehearses for an upcoming intervi…
/r/MensRights26/02/15 08:43 AM
7

Implying you still don't have to pay extra for the bus pass.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:17 AM
18

This is one of the top hang-ups I hear from friends that want to work out. Not a fear of girls judging them (or at least not a stated fear), but people in general.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:34 AM
35

Absolutely bogus, and that must certainly be illegal. 3-5 is the best time, too, since that's right before the rush arrives. Can you imagine getting the best time slot secured for only members of your sex? Talk about privilege!
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:32 AM
12

"It's okay if I do it."
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:47 AM
-2

You're trespassing a little near redpill territory, friend.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:41 AM
1

I would like to believe that.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:26 AM
3

Except the "not all men" thing (and the mocking attached to anyone making that argument) started way before "yes all women," so your interpretation of events is based off an incorrect timeline. Also take that apologist shit elsewhere. You know as well as I do that YesAllWomen was responsible for the "Bowl of M&M's" horse shit among many other things. It most certainly did implicate men as being villains.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:19 PM
2

Because they don't like being called to task on their bigotry, so they mock those who make the clearest and most obvious argument against them. Say it with no shame, and be prepared to offer a rhetorical bitchslap to anyone who tries to mock you for it. "Not all men" is a perfectly valid response to these bigots, which is precisely why they make fun of it.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:14 PM
–

Maybe women should have more toilets in their restrooms due to waits, which everyone and their mothers (especially) know about. I think you could make a reasonable case for that. But the author went after the low hanging fruit of sexism and male privilege and she is exactly why people think feminism is becoming a joke. How terribly appropriate that this is from Time, whose readership voted "feminism" as the worst word of 2014. This is why.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:10 PM
1

Salon is Gawker tier trash.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 06:08 AM
2

Time to see a doctor?
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:18 AM
8

Actual sexism. Fuck off. lol at people downvoting this and upvoting the other guy. I want redpill to leave.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 07:10 AM
1

lol yeah, the mob agrees with you, congratulations. Feel comfortable knowing your bigotry is shared by many. I certainly can't. :)
/r/MensRights16/12/14 05:44 AM
1

So, by your own admission, you enjoy living in ignorance. Cool.
/r/MensRights16/12/14 05:43 AM
2

Because your position is dogmatic and easily proven wrong. I'm a gay man. I've watched you hopelessly flounder through each argument throughout this entire thread. You have no idea, absolutely none, of what you are talking about. The first being that homosexuality isn't something that "spreads" or that people are recruited into. You sound just as ignorant as the minister in the article who "cured 200" of Uganda's "400" gays.
/r/MensRights14/12/14 07:17 PM
2

Interesting and well done piece, but Jesus Christ those commenters.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 02:25 AM
7

So what? You're already "lobbed in with the crazy people" simply by virtue of posting here. What's the problem assuming you're confident that you're correct? Don't let closed-minded bullies' evaluations of your mental health get in the way of your ability to have an unpopular opinion, if it is well reasoned.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:35 AM
3

Exactly. She's just as guilty of essentializing gay people as say, religious zealots are. I don't participate in any of that, many of us don't.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 08:01 PM
3

It's not even largely correct, either. If we're talking United States, it's still illegal in most states for gay people to get hitched. To state that we're getting "most" of what we've fought for is just wrong. We're making progress, but it's not even mostly done.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:51 PM
4

That's what pissed me off more than anything else. Her opinion's obnoxious, fine, I'm used to celebrities saying dumb shit. It was the feminists/white knights in the comments all attesting to her point that really got to me.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:50 PM
6

You're fine, I appreciate the sentiment.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:47 PM
3

Interesting, I made a similar comment in /r/kotakuinaction in response to SJW ridiculousness: This is becoming the new Godwin's Law; the longer an argument continues, the likelihood of being accused of being a privileged, straight, white male approaches 1.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:46 PM
71

As a gay guy, this infuriates me. How dare she reduce the injustices gay people, specifically gay men in this case, face across the world? It just further demonstrates feminists' tenuous and purely self-serving alliance with the LGBT community. Like, here we are, a group of people who still face prejudice and discrimination (or worse) on the regular, even in the United States, only to be insulted by people like this. I always scoffed at the term "gynocentrism," but this shit embodies it. In some…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:29 AM
1

brb getting a bucket salt.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:31 AM
1

Yeah, fascists are infuriating.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 05:31 AM
3

Here's a demonstration.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:29 AM
3

I'm a gay man. I don't think feminism has failed me personally, and the caveat needs to be made that of course I support "equality feminism" (for egalitarians who simply like that title). I think I condemn Sommers' "gender feminism" for the same reason most others here do. Pure and simple bigotry. I condemn any group of people willing to partition people in categories based on physiological/psychological characteristics and create a hierarchy of "privilege." It doesn't matter who you are, that i…
/r/MensRights29/10/14 11:31 PM
4

This makes me a little uneasy. It seems like of the same kind of politicization of tragedy that I'd condemn if anyone else attempted it (NRA vs gun control advocates, for example). This doesn't seem like the right way to go about having this discussion.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 09:03 AM
6

It's official. Anita Sarkeesian is literally Jack Thompson. We have come full fucking circle. I need a drink, maybe this will be funny then.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 05:19 AM
3

Nothing says "I am confident in my opinion" more than disabling any and all criticism of that opinion.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 04:06 PM
8

The fact that the author linked to this stupid, bigoted nonsense as a way to demonstrate the misandry isn't real completely defies reason. The mental gymnastics involved.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:00 AM
6

I don't know what to say, other than that I am so, so sick of this shit.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 05:11 AM
7

Does this make any sense? Are men obliged to provide free quarters to female acquaintances in town? What, you mean that's not part of the Third Amendment?
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:25 AM
2

Disappointed you didn't get something about "phallic representations" in there but great work.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:20 AM
4

Saw a friend post this last night, this was my response: "I see this tactic used a lot. To coin a term popularly used by Tumblr feminists, this reeks of "but what about the [wo]men!" It's just a deflection/derailing tactic. Let's create an example (which I have seen before): someone calls me a faggot. Now, you'd think that's homophobic and call it a day. But no, homophobia against men is actually due to the prejudicial attitude that gay men have feminine traits, therefor homophobia against men i…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 10:23 PM
2

Very helpful, thank you.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:50 PM
6

Is that the same as the fallacy of composition?
/r/MensRights14/10/14 06:25 PM
3

Reminds me of that ridiculous piece a while back where a woman wasn't able to film a revolt because her patriarchal Samsung Galaxy was too big for her tiny hands
/r/MensRights02/10/14 11:07 PM
1

Feminists do not want you to lose custody of your children. The assumption that women are naturally better caregivers is part of patriarchy. Right. Patriarchy, right. Definitely not this. The feminists of the nineteenth century would be rolling in their graves if they knew their successors were writing off their victories. These people can't even keep their own history straight. Any feminist who says that women being the primary caretakers of children is a "patriarchal" notion automatically gets…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 06:17 PM
4

Gay guy here. This is why I abhor gay media like Advocate and Queerty. Somehow it always manages to be even more insipid and hypocritical than Jezebel.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 04:12 AM
2

Why do people on this subreddit so often seem to think the solution to feminist excess is to mirror that excess for males? Exactly. Why compete in a race to the bottom. I'd say men are oddly better off here, since we don't have a massive political lobby telling us at every turn that it's fine if we settle for being lazy and unfit. As a result, I think we're more likely to accurately assess that excess adiposity is a health problem and something that should be dealt with, where women are told tha…
/r/MensRights23/09/14 05:35 PM
5

First thing I noticed, too. Thank God we have the True Feminists to tell everyone what feminism is.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:01 PM
10

There should be a campaign promoting fat pride for men too. I can't overstate how much I disagree with this. We should be aiming to end the entire premise of "fat pride" altogether. There's nothing wrong with being comfortable with how you look. However, the intellectual leaps the body positivity movement have taken are insulting at best and dangerous at worst. The last thing I want to see it do is spread to more people.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 01:58 PM
1

Besides, it's not hard to lose weight, but it's a lot easier to bitch and whine and not go to the gym. Or blame any and all fast food manufacturers. Spoilers, they wouldn't be the global conglomerates they are if consumers didn't fund them. How people can get so angry at a monster they created is beyond me, as is their failure to understand that you can make it go away (or change its practices) by not investing your money in it. EDIT: sorry, I know that's a bit of a tangent, but few things make …
/r/MensRights23/09/14 01:51 PM
5

This seems likely. However, I've dated a teacher, and I've heard no shortage of stories about absolutely psycho parents. EDIT: I'm honored to have offered this response to The Patriarchy itself.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 04:04 AM
1

Not sure why you got downvoted there, because that's exactly correct. The "it's all men's jobs to fix other men's moral flaws" thing is BS that pops up frequently.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:49 PM
6

"Does modern day feminism have a place for a straight white guy?" Trying to respond as reasonably as I can, I have seen no shortage of "articles" about the role of male allies. Usually, their role is to: Not talk. Believe everything a woman tells you at face value. Absolutely do not question them, since asking questions is tantamount to denying their lived experience. It is not their job to qualify or quantify any statement they make. Don't expect any thanks or gratitude of any kind. Seriously, …
/r/MensRights20/09/14 07:11 AM
1

There's literally no reason to oppose this. Like, what is there to even be angry at? Yet, here we are.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 12:13 AM
6

I really don't understans the huge hate for Anita one one hand Maybe you should do a bit of digging.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:38 AM
7

The distinction is that Sommers said she was "surprised" to see that even she was categorized as a gamer and thought it was important to make a distinction between someone playing games at one point in their life, and people who routinely play games at certain intervals. Sommers isn't pretending to be something she isn't.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 12:37 AM
19

I wonder why Anita is seen as a 'liar' because she likes some games and not all, so she is not a "gamer" It's because she literally fucking said "I'm not a fan of video games."
/r/MensRights17/09/14 12:20 AM
18

In my opinion, no. Because just as games are not known to cause violence, there is no evidence that videogames cause sexism, or issues in self esteem. This is exactly why I scoff at people like Anita Sarkeesian and the rest of the feminist crowd that has infiltrated gaming. They'll happily stand behind studies that show how video games don't make people violent, but then they'll turn around and accuse them of making men into misogynists with their content. Can't have it both ways. These people h…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 05:36 AM
1

'But feminism doesn't support gender roles! This is just another outlier radfem who doesn't represent us at all. Why don't you go learn what feminism actually is.'
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:20 PM
3

Don't you know? Gay men aren't actually attracted to men, they just hate women so much that they're rather be with men. In all seriousness, you'd be surprised how many "articles" pop up on sites like Gawker (surprise) detailing how misogynistic those gay men are for focusing on men instead of women. Like this, for example. (TRIGGER WARNING: MASSIVE DOSES OF STUPID; MALE GUILT)
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:34 AM
2

Complaining about young men not being able to furnish a lavish lifestyle for you during a time when most young people are very, very poor.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:20 AM
1

The entire introduction makes it sound like he only killed women, when in fact he killed mostly men. These people want to talk about how society "hates women," yet what is erasing the deaths of men if not hateful?
/r/MensRights08/09/14 05:08 AM
11

I would have understood just slightly more if it were a private school, but seriously, pulling this shit in public school does not fucking fly. Dress codes are one thing, but this is a pretty good example of "body policing."
/r/MensRights08/09/14 04:48 AM
0

Shot in the dark: Oberlin? My brother's roommate went there, he said the SJW mentality was ubiquitous and insufferable.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:21 AM
6

Thank you for your response. I understand how this is troubling now.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:34 AM
1

I see. Thank you for your response.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 06:33 AM
2

Incredible. I wish I knew that person's FB so I could go like it.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:25 AM
–

Maybe I'm ignorant here, can someone explain what's bad about this? I remember seeing "enthusiastic consent" a ways back, which was a bit ridiculous, but that language seems to have been stricken.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:19 AM
2

Totally. It's in my best interest to address it as well; I don't want to be viewed as someone who endorses that ideology.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 09:56 AM
2

Yes. I can see where it looked like I was referring to it with a sense of legitimacy, sorry for being unclear.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:03 AM
5

Yeah, god forbid people actually change their perceptions of us!
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:31 PM
5

mensrights is excluded from bestof Wow, I had no idea.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:35 PM
10

I've said this before, and very wordily at that, so I'm going to try to condense: Many feminists today accept that we are living in a "patriarchy," which means they believe men are uniquely advantaged, and women are inherently disadvantaged. Therefor, when men air their grievances, feminists are less likely to hear them out because they believe men are already so far ahead of women that their complaints are trifles next to women's. Patriarchy predisposes women to dismiss men's issues. It's messe…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:31 PM
44

Funny how a user named "pickfights" was ready to hightail it out of there so soon.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:28 PM
1

Usually not without controversy, and when we get those threads the comments generally revolve around the theme of "get that shit out of here."
/r/MensRights18/08/14 07:33 PM
3

What disgusts me most about feminists' reaction to the UCSB shootings was how they completely erased the male victims' deaths to promote their agenda. They'll champion the success of their stupid fucking #yesallwomen Twitter hashtag against the lives of real human beings.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:13 AM
1

I think it's mostly ignorance. I think these people honestly believe they're "fighting the good fight," if only because people lack the self-awareness to see themselves as villains in most situations. I think a lot of these people just "report" what they've seen written by other feminist writers. It's just an echo chamber where the same tired comments and statistics and word-bytes are flung around with precisely zero critical thought applied. I haven't ever seen one of these writers say, "I visi…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:08 AM
2

Gotta love how in the second paragraph she says "pro-feminist" in a way that implies that is only correct school of thought. Like, in order to be a "good" advocate you also have to be pro-feminist. Dogmatic assholes. "Moderate" my ass. And naturally, all the "pro-male" sites she lists are really just "pro-men addressing women's issues" sites. I keep hearing awful things about AVFM that I don't usually see. I know Elam is not exactly the best at PR, but does AVFM really host anything resembling r…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 09:02 AM
24

Why do feminists claim ownership of all gender related issues? What's it to them if another group wants to focus on a side that is generally ignored? More than any other aspect of feminism, I am continually mystified how angry it becomes when men choose to address issues that they claim to acknowledge are issues as well, but don't do anything about. tl;dr, what's it to ya, feminists? Why the need for control?
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:34 AM
1

It only occurred to me recently, actually. One day I just realized, hey, If my man and I parts ways, neither of us have to worry about financially supporting each other afterward. We could just pack our stuff and lead our lives. No lawyers, nobody walking away with the other's possessions. No government involvement, just two adults making a decision between them. The only point of conflict in these scenarios would be if a couple was raising a child. That could get very ugly.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:37 AM
4

This may be a non-sequitur, but I'm fairly tipsy so hey. As a gay man, I'm actually glad to be living in a state where gay marriage is not legal. Frankly, I see "marriage equality" as a massive step backwards from where we are now. Gay people already have the freedom to define the nature of our relationships without any bureaucracy or fear of the undue financial burden of divorce. And since marriage isn't legal, there's zero social pressure to do it. I think the position we're in is very much wh…
/r/MensRights15/08/14 08:23 AM
1

Debunked: Testosterone does not induce aggression, study shows Take your facts and data elsewhere, please.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:39 AM
1

This significantly narrows down our options, then.
/r/MensRights15/08/14 02:19 AM
2

3) I understand that SOME men have done horrible things to children (as have some women), but it's not okay to just start accusing all men of these horrible things. 4) Being called a cunt is not worse than being accused of molesting your daughter. In what world could that be worse? Without even reading the thread you can tell feminist jimmies were rustled from those edits.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 08:56 PM
5

"She's a woman, she doesn't have the power to be sexist." SJW or Redpill?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 07:49 PM
13

I love that disabled men are still required to at least register despite their obvious inability to perform the tasks required of them in service, but perfectly able-bodied women have no such requirement. It's so unbelievably backwards. That said, I'm on the "no one" side of the "everyone or no one" fence.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:33 AM
19

Nice. And the best part is there's pretty much no arguing with what has been said here. On that note, I can't wait for the response from Time, Gawker, Jezebel and Thought Catalog itself. For every article focused on men's issues, no matter how well-researched or accurate, there are another dozen articles in response that use the same tired advocacy research and everyone goes back to their same comfortable worldview where women can only be victims and men have "all the rights." Too bad.
/r/MensRights14/08/14 04:27 AM
1

Wow. Who'd have guessed she'd turn out to be a pretty normal, reasonable person.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:41 AM
1

I just don't understand. If we're talking about violence against sexes then men have won that particular race to the bottom. If the world hates women, as the video suggests, then I can't imagine how it feels about men. That said, that doesn't discount any of the violence done against these people. It's all awful. I just wish we didn't have to keep looking at it through this lens.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 04:09 AM
7

Tenth: Your man is passionate about states’ rights. Racists and homophobes love states’ rights. Be afraid. Yeah those are literally the only people. I'm getting sick of seeing public education regurgitated back at me. Yeah yeah, this is the same shit I heard in high school, I'm sorry you didn't choose to educate yourself past that point. Also probably 90% of people would say the First Amendment is the most important (and make no mistake: it is). And she condemns people who would endorse it. Does…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:55 AM
9

You don’t judge yourself for eating a cake; you haven’t, since childhood, been encouraged by the media and by every careless comment from your family to have a relationship with food that borders on psychosis. This struck me. I'm a guy who has dealt with anorexia and other eating disorders since middle school. Eating disorders are not gendered issues, I wish sexist fucks like this would see that. You are why we're too embarrassed to talk about it, and why no one takes us seriously when we finall…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:29 AM
2

Eh, I've always thought the word "objectify" is a moot term. I mean, in 99% of those instances, aren't people just being sexualized? Are the two interchangeable? Or are these people actually being portrayed as objects? At the end of the day, anyone claiming that men cannot be sexualized/objectified has never walked through the Romance aisle of a bookstore. If men could not be portrayed or perceived in a sexually appealing way then the human race would not have gotten very far. And it's that simp…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 09:02 PM
9

This is so infuriating. They just gave these children a lifelong disease from a disgusting practice that they absolutely would not have consented to, if they could. But that's just the thing. They were never given that option. I'm all for religious freedom but that freedom shouldn't extend onto other people who can't make decisions in regard to it. Fuck everything about this.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:47 AM
2

What, standing against one injustice means you can't stand against another injustice? This is idiotic.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:37 AM
2

I was surprised by this. Ever since Time started publishing Suey Park's incoherent rambling I haven't known what to expect.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:17 AM
3

Let's remember that a person has the right to refuse sex for any reason. I don't like what this is insinuating at all. she needs to take responsibility for her failures as a woman and as a wife immediately or her marriage will be over. This stinks of Red Pill.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:13 AM
3

Speaking of farm animals, this piece is horse shit. What the absolute fuck, New York Post. Also, I'm always so surprised how people can say shit like "men are pigs" without having an understanding of how dehumanizing an entire group of people has a really ugly history, and they are now guilty of participating in it.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:05 AM
6

I think the most offensive thing about this piece is its overuse of ellipses. Seriously... just... stop.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 04:57 AM
5

Gay man here: lemme just say that shaving does look good and frankly it's a mercy to your partner when you get down and dirty. Being serious, don't feminists continually lambast the whole idea of dressing for the sake people other than yourself? This piece is literally "Do this because we want you to look a certain way and I don't like it." I mean. There's just no self awareness. Absolutely none. Also, talk about body shaming! Some guys just don't grow hair on their chest or face. I read somethi…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:37 AM
2

I agree with this, and I also disagree with the premise of the initiative. It was specifically the user's comment I was calling out, irrespective of the actual topic.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 09:50 PM
5

You're walking on the edge of a razor with that line of thought. If you're the breadwinner for the family (assuming only one spouse works), you're the breadwinner for the family. It's not really your money, it's the money you're making for everyone. If one person spends more time at home then it makes sense that they'd manage the budget. Since they'll be maintaining the home and purchasing necessities like food and gas, they will have a much better idea of how much they need to be spending... ve…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:58 AM
1

Straw-proud-WOC, shitlord.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:30 AM
7

Every time I read about this I find it no less disturbing. This is pedophilia. Not only that, but they gave these poor kids a lifelong condition that will have a significant and negative effect them for the rest of their lives, all done without their ability to decline (which any sane person would). It's absolutely fucking disgusting. The things we're willing to preserve in the name of religious freedom.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 06:26 AM
2

Time to leave the planet.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 09:06 PM
3

That Adria Richards one. Isn't that the woman who basically ruined a guy's life because he told an exceptionally mild dick joke to the guy who was sitting next to him? And she just happened to be in earshot? How can they possibly fall on her side?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:11 AM
3

Jesus. I feel like I just stepped in something truly frightening.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 03:55 AM
8

Both have been fired from their jobs in the school district. Each faces up to 30 years in prison on the charge. Just saying.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 11:42 PM
3

Good idea! BRB contacting publishers right now.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:23 AM
3

Oh I thought there was going to be like, an actual article. Too much work, I guess.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 07:11 AM
1

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said compulsory sex education classes should be held in all schools to tackle the rise of sexist abuse fuelled by internet porn Oh, people still believe this?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 12:45 AM
20

Let me guess: "shut up and accept our narrative; never ask us to elaborate on our experiences or prove anything. Accept what we tell you at face value. Don't be offended when we insult you, the conversation isn't about you. Don't talk over us." This is typically what I read in "how to be an ally" articles. As yet I haven't read it, we'll see how much I got right. I should add, as a gay guy I welcome everyone who claims to be on "my side" without all the fucking rules these people set in place, w…
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:26 AM
7

You knew what was coming as soon as they said she was a women's studies professor. Because they are known for being great, unbiased resources on the topic of gender disparity.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 05:52 PM
4

TIL only straight men watch porn.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 12:26 AM
7

Not even a conservative here, but god damn is it irritating when people treat anything coming from a "conservative" source as toxic waste, even if the information is good. So fucking sick of it. People literally won't see reality if it differs from their worldview. Edit: I should mention that of course I see the opposite occur as well, where information from the "liberal media" is brushed off regardless of merit or accuracy. I just tend to see the former more.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:33 PM
6

That's pretty weird man. Also work with people definitely does not equal feminism.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:41 PM
2

I love these videos so much. I am consistently impressed by pretty much everything Christina Hoff Sommers has to say, and she does it, for the most part, without too many pointed comments, which makes her a great response for your Facebook frothing-at-the-mouth SJW.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:39 PM
3

I hope you skip it. Refuse to participate in that horse shit.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:06 AM
2

Hate this. As a gay guy I'd love to see some men's issues groups at Pride. I wish these organizers knew that we're on their side, and shit, that gay men are also part of the movement. Oh well. As a poster above mentioned, the gay rights lobby and the feminist movement are practically indistinguishable from one another.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 07:09 AM
115

This is not difficult. Few things more infuriating/hilarious than a smug moron.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 07:01 AM
2

I don't know man, I go to 4chan pretty frequently and frankly /pol/'s pretty fucking shocking.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:39 AM
1

That sort of came from left field honestly, and I'm not really sure how much of your post actually addresses anything I said.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:23 AM
2

/fit/ Looks legit. I'm sure, like all greentext stories, it is completely true to reality.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:19 AM
5

I hope this doesn't sound sexist, but I roll my eyes every time a female writer tries to tell men what "real men" are and how they need to "man up." Similarly, I'd scoff at male writers telling what it is to be a woman. But it seems like that doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:13 AM
1

This isn't an article, it's a polemic. I don't trust journalists who feel the need to make the reader feel a certain way. It just makes you look insecure.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:43 AM
3

Is that an accurate statistic or an exaggeration?
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:06 PM
3

I wonder, in how many of those families did the husband/father work and the mother/wife stay at home? In situations like that, the one who works definitely deserves slack for household chores, regardless if that person is male or female.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 03:00 AM
2

The complaint about "illuminati conspiracy" is a tad ironic since that's exactly what "patriarchy theory" is.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:45 AM
4

The worst part is she probably just wanted to do curls with it.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:39 AM
2

I think that may be also called a confirmation bias.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:31 AM
1

Anyone who says men can't be sexualized or "objectified" has never walked through the romance section of a bookstore. Seriously, on most of the covers they don't even show the guy's face, just their upper torso, a piece of meat. It's actually just like Grindr.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:29 AM
4

Use your position of power ... Cannot fucking roll my eyes hard enough.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 06:26 AM
7

we get paid less Welp, that just about sums up the credibility of the entire video. Then again, I've gotten to a point where I just tune out anyone who uses the word "patriarchy" seriously.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 04:59 AM
1

Would you know where I can find that, senor?
/r/MensRights15/05/14 02:35 AM
5

Misandy Mermaid As ever, demonstrating zero self awareness.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:22 AM
4

So men who are manipulated into purchasing something based on their own insecurities = rapists. So what does that make the women who keep the fad diet industry alive and well?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:05 AM
1

Wow what a rational response to a schoolyard kerfuffle. What the fuck is a cop even doing there, with a fucking taser no less. Why couldn't school authorities just deal with it? Unreal. Tasing minors should be illegal.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 05:45 AM
0

I'm pretty sedentary in terms of my work and I still take time to lift weights and eat (mostly) correctly. You'd be surprised how easy it is to stay fit even when working something like an office job. Just takes a little self control and discipline.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:13 PM
1

It used to be white, straight men but apparently they've recently revised their manifesto to include gay men, because gay men still have male privilege. Duh.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:00 PM
5

I don't understand how someone could believe in equal treatment while simultaneously supporting a male-only draft. Those two ideas contradict each other. If you are an egalitarian (which I suspect she ultimately isn't) you would support the draft for everyone, or you would not support it at all. I guess that gets fewer clicks, though.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:50 PM
2

100%
/r/MensRights02/05/14 04:38 PM
3

Thanks friend!
/r/MensRights02/05/14 03:45 AM
6

I think the easiest way to stump these people is simply to ask "so what?" Oh no, only 33% of the highest grossing films from 2013 had female protagonists? Well, considering they were the highest grossing films of 2013 that obviously means general audiences didn't have enough of a problem with it for it to have an unfavorable effect (affect?) on sales. As yet, no one has proven that this is actually a problem in any sort of way. Less women on screen ≠ misogyny simply by virtue of their absence, a…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:37 AM
3

Not really sure why you and the other guy got down voted for suggesting that, just maybe, going to the gym is a good habit and maybe something everyone should consider doing. People don't react negatively to the idea that you should brush your teeth, going to the gym is much the same thing: it's maintenance for your fucking health, not a frivolity.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 03:13 AM
1

I'm not denying anyone's right to do anything, just observing that it's incredibly fucking frivolous to go into such great detail about why you're dissatisfied with someone else's fan art. It's dumb when feminists do it, and it's dumb when the MRM does it.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 03:36 PM
6

Not sure why there are so many comments in regards to their appearance. The artist chose to draw them a certain way they fancied, and considering the source material it seems perfectly fitting that they'd turn out the way they did. Also, the artist is female, so she was probably just painting what is attractive to her. Rolling my eyes pretty hard at the over thinker above me. Seriously, it is just fan art, it's not the artists' job to represent all shapes and sizes of men in their recreational a…
/r/MensRights20/04/14 05:11 AM
6

She's probably just jelly because she can't grow one... Just like me.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 04:54 AM
7

I have generally believed that when you anger someone to the point where all they can do is insult you without responding to you, you have done something right. In this regard, Saunders' original piece was clearly a success.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 08:30 PM
4

AMR hates inclusive attitudes. What a surprise.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 04:57 AM
12

Yes, if we just take the Star Trek posters down, then women will finally enter the tech fields. Because we all know how much women hate Star Trek. I know many women who would resent the implication that any of these things are inherently male. What a surprise, feminists being sexist toward men and women once again.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 05:48 AM
2

Jesus Christ, that first point. Because it's not harmful at all to imply that all men (and exclusively men. The author made no mention of women) are "potential rapists?" And what the hell is with that quote? We refuse to accept that nice guys rape, and they do it often. Yeah, fuck this pile of garbage. What could possibly be harmful about trying to paint every decent man as a would-be rapist? These people are so fucking irresponsible.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 02:15 AM
4

So, what was the Tender Years Doctrine? Wasn't that where feminists pretty much said "we are the natural caretakers for children" to gain custody? Can't the "patriarchal" notion that women are the natural caretakers for young children be directly attributed to early feminism? Am I missing something? Edit: that was less related to the topic and more related to what that person was saying in the screen capture. It's amazing how unaware these people are of their own history.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 06:15 AM
2

Throwaway post I made after a friend posted this video on Facebook. My information may be a bit off, I admit I wrote off the cuff without looking at the data: Sweeping generalizations given the appearance of credibility because the speaker is a man. Blaming complex issues uniquely on one group of people is called scapegoating, and it is a fallacious and VERY DANGEROUS line of thought. Placing culpability solely on men's shoulders is a gross over simplification of the issues outlined. Also, by sa…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 06:16 PM
2

|against men's rights How kind of them to be so upfront about their bigotry!
/r/MensRights06/12/13 05:15 AM
-2

Pretty sure they were just looking for an excuse to slam Anita again. What they may not have considered is that you don't need an excuse to slam Anita. If the text read, "Yeah we're gonna tear down Sarkeesian again," I'm pretty sure everyone here would be okay with that.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 05:39 AM
8

This detrimental image generates a deep sense of desire and adventure within the white man -- a desire to colonize her body -- 'eat' it up, and use it to come to know himself. Through fucking a coloured woman, the white man transcends his 'whiteness' and innocence, moving into more experienced and dangerous territory. Literally through her body, he learns what he is and what he is not. He gains access to cross the border into a dark territory that only he, of all his friends, has yet to venture …
/r/MensRights15/11/13 05:28 AM
6

Because 4chan's reaction to anything means what, exactly? It's a board full of anonymous posters, some of which can actually just be one person responding to themselves. Citing 4chan's reaction to anything means nothing because nothing is being tracked and everything just winds up getting deleted anyway... which is demonstrative of every comment's worth there.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 12:52 AM
14

Everybody is welcome. Laughed audibly.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 02:30 AM
1

Feels bad seeing this out of my former home county. /non sequitur
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:16 PM
1

Excellent, thanks a bunch.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 02:58 PM
5

More importantly, though, what about the topic of article he posted in? Has that been addressed here?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:27 AM
8

Unbelievable. Screen capped in the event of any covert, ex-post-facto edits.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 06:17 AM
8

Number 16 on the first list is infuriating. Remember, as a man it's your job to actively demonstrate that you are not a threat to women. It cannot just be assumed that you are a normal person, you must prove it.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 02:34 AM
7

Huh. I Notice she made a few important distinctions at critical moments to ensure that the reader interprets the MRA as a hateful group: MRAs claim to be a movement for positive change, with the stated aim of getting men recognized as an oppressed class—and women, especially but not exclusively feminists, as men’s oppressors. This is so misinformed it's hard to believe it wasn't deliberately done. MRM is the response to radical feminism, not... women. Contrary to what the author states, the MRM …
/r/MensRights25/10/13 06:25 AM
2

Those comments...
/r/MensRights24/10/13 05:41 PM
-1

What?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:15 AM
5

Can anyone actually point to an instance where the strength disparity of men and women actually led to injury, or loss of life? Specific examples where, because of that person's sex, not just general incompetence, that person failed at performing their duty?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:01 AM
-8

Your point doesn't make sense. Being overweight isn't linked to your sex; you have a measure of control over the former.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:47 AM
-10

"I don´t care if most of these women "can´t help it". So what? By your logic, we should be letting 350-pound people with thyroid conditions, who can´t run a mile, into the Marines because "they can´t help it". This is a red herring. A person with that kind of problem is essentially disabled. Similarly, I am done with this line of discussion. I did not think that suggesting what I did would be seen as so unreasonable. At the end of the day, strong men and strong women have similar levels of funct…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:37 AM
-9

Strong men and women can generally lift in numbers surpassing one hundred pounds. At most, furnishings typically weigh, what, 150 pounds? Not to mention you'd have more than one person there to carry the bigger articles. A group of strong women could, realistically, move the same amount of furniture as a strong group of men.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:07 AM
-15

There seems to be a misunderstanding. I am not arguing in favor of mediocre standards. As I said below, three pulls is terrible by all accounts. I am arguing for realistic standards based on what is possible based on each sex's physiological capabilities. Men should have high standards in relation to how men typically gain strength, and so should women. This does generally mean that women will appear to have "lower" standards than men, but you need to understand that strength is a ratio. A 165lb…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 06:00 AM
-14

This creates an unfortunate dilemma: by keeping strength standards uniformly high, you put far greater burden on women to be as strong as their male comrades, which just isn't realistic. It makes entry to the military much more difficult for women, simply based on the physiological fact that they cannot gain strength the way men do. Is that not essentially sexism? On the other hand, it's exactly as you say: strength matters here, and it's not necessarily about equality. I don't know what to tell…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:41 AM
–

Except men and women gain strength in different proportions. Men are built to gain strength much faster, and generally will be able to lift a significantly higher ratio of their body weight than women will, provided they started training at the same time (obviously a woman who has trained for years is going to be stronger than a man who just started). That's a biological reality; women just don't produce the same levels of testosterone that men do. Not only that, but women tend to just weigh les…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 05:13 AM
–

Three pulls/chins is very poor, especially for a fit person. I know many women (who don't even consider themselves to be that strong) who do weighted pulls/chins. Any fit person, man or woman, should be able to at least a single set of ten unweighted pulls. Maybe eight. If ANYTHING, I see this as being sexist against women for placing the bar so insultingly low.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 02:34 AM
-1

I do not claim to be a Grecian god, only a guy who takes care of himself. I engage in healthy exercise, and with the exception of several vices (all of which being ice cream) I eat pretty well. I would LIKE to think that I do not represent some outlier as you suggest, but the norm for a regular, healthy guy.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 02:15 AM
2

Thank you!
/r/MensRights13/10/13 01:08 AM
7

I dislike this. I despise the author's use of the term "real man." I am a man who puts time and energy into staying in shape. So, too, are the men who model those underwear. How are they not "real men?" I resent the implication that a "real man" is inherently overweight or--frankly--unattractive.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 11:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter