TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thesneedfulneedful Archive

View 0 posts and 518 comments by thesneedfulneedful on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

He is expected to keep his head down, be silent, accept not having access to basic life-motivating and spirit-enriching sociosexual milestones that once missed can never be compensated for, and just grind grind grind himself into nothing working and striving for pretty much nothing until he's old and broken and worn out and then maybe he'll get a loveless pseudo-arranged relationship with a woman who sees him as a last resort when he's 30+. When he speaks up or points it out, they are enraged. H…
/r/AllPillDebate13/11/23 06:07 PM
5

Replying to nonsense from a comment chain in this thread: Who aspires to be with average? Like I myself won't just settle for one of the average guys I find unnatractive. Like why would I, when I myself don't think of myself as average? Also, even if I may be average without makeup, I know how to look hot AF on tinder. Makeup and a great haircut and I look sexy AF. Average looking dudes often don't know how to make themselves appear sexier than they are. No ones talking about "aspirations", don'…
/r/AllPillDebate13/11/23 06:01 PM
4

Rizz? Jizz. Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate13/11/23 05:41 PM
9

Don't worry, if she can't find a 6'+ partner she'll be back at 30+ telling you how great your personality is. She might have gone to bed with him, but she'll go home with you. How heckin' wholesomerino y'all!
/r/AllPillDebate13/11/23 04:56 PM
1

Why are you pissing your pants with your dad?
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 10:57 PM
3

They aren't. In every niche they are looking for the same few guys in that niche that are tall and handsome. The rest is set dressing and larping for them. Its why they always want to invade male spaces, even desperate ones where incels gather. There might be a few tall handsome guys there.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 10:56 PM
2

No you don't, and nope, they aren't. Yes, its only because they're tall.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 10:55 PM
2

Nope, you don't. And yes, you are sure.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 10:55 PM
2

Something on the order of 20% of women can't orgasm at all because the chad is not hot enough Another 30-40% have difficulty achieving orgasm via penetration because the chad's dick is too small and he is not hot enough
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 10:52 PM
5

Nope, in fact virtually all negative emotions and actions towards women have been found to be consistently committed by men who are sexually popular with women. Men who are not sexually popular with women have next to no social contact, positive or negative, with women, because they are quickly rejected and what little contact they do have is much more likely to be positive or neutral on their end out of desperation and naivety. It is precisely the men that women choose to be around and engage s…
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 10:47 PM
4

No you weren't, that's why you were corrected. You're engaging in bad faith again, and you were caught out.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 10:44 PM
17

It wasn't the numbers alone but the types of disease and the relative prevalence of different diseases in different groups of boys and girls. the difference was not marginal, it was dramatic. you're presenting information and pretending as if contradicts my point when it is tangential. thats a very bizarre and dishonest tactic.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 07:28 AM
3

getting a loveless, utilitarian, practical goal based relationship from a woman desperate to check off family, kids, and house on her facebook life goals checklist is easier. that novelty to love, sex, and relationships thats necessary for a genuine romantically loving relationship? long gone by her 30s. early 20s are the last legs of that phase of her life. and most people date people within a few years age of each other, so thats what gets easier to attain for a man in his 30s.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 07:23 AM
6

get easier for what? dating women who are in their 30s+ isn't really dating, it's being a simp, unless you're talking about no strings attached casual sex.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 07:22 AM
4

nah. cum.
/r/AllPillDebate12/11/23 06:58 AM
4

You have a defeatist attitude and are a wimpy brat. Just be a heckin decent humanberino for once, y'all maybe. Heckin' workcel!
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 11:35 PM
52

It's obviously soft harems. The STD evidence shows that this has been the case since the early 2000s, with most girls in graduating high school classes testing positive for the same STDs that afflict only a small proportion of the boys. Many of them are knowingly in them, others are not. But just like the last generation of anti-blackpill theologians, you'll never get those extremists to back down from their anti-science worldview.
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 10:48 PM
5

Your brain keeps developing in your 20s No, and this is the danger of pop pseudoscience combined with semi-literacy and low IQ interpretations. The development of the human brain, like all other things, fall on a statistical distribution. Some people continue to develop into their 20s, some have surpassed those slow developers in their teens and finished developing, and some fall between these two groups. But even in the most extreme cases, the portion of neurocognitive development that occurs a…
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 10:20 PM
7

Indeed, anti-blackpill is religious science denialism.
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 10:18 PM
1

Warn them that young women are hot and kind and stable compared to SSRI doped up wrinkly uggos in their 30s. Gasp. How could they ever have known? Except with their two eyes.
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 09:41 PM
2

You don't ask fish how to fish. Of course you wouldn't pick the version of you that makes you feel most insecure about yourself to be the immortal you. they are their most hot and volatile Hot yes, and most stable in their 20s. Women become more unstable as they age, and more manipulative/predatory, as your hysterical attempt at reframing demonstrates. Their personalities worsen horrifically with age. By your age, their saggy skin and demonic countenance combined with their nasty personalities m…
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 09:32 PM
1

nah. sneed.
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 05:49 PM
1

No, this is incorrect. In fact, the victims of bullies are far MORE likely to be victims of abuse at home than the bullies are. Bullies are far LESS likely to be victims of abuse at home not just than their victims but than a random sample of the general population, and in fact pick their victims just the way abusers do. Bullies are the popular men/boys, the ones that have high status and come from comfortable safe homes, and tend to be taller and more attractive. The guys that girls/women drool…
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 05:39 PM
10

I briefly scanned your post and couldn't find any links to peer reviewed replicated research anywhere. The blackpill is about the settled science of sociosexual dynamics between men and women, so to critique it in even the slightest way you'll have to start with that as a base and bring those high quality, replicated studies alongside your viewpoints. Famous people, people you've personally seen/know, and your life are not forms of evidence. They are you masturbating to yourself.
/r/AllPillDebate11/11/23 05:35 PM
1

Casual sex is not dating. Sneed cum.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 09:38 PM
1

Yours is a Saudi Arabian, extremist misogynist mindset that endorses cold calculated arranged marriage goals. Interesting that this is your worldview. Children and a family need to be raised in a home where the parents are in romantic love with each other, or they end up mentally destroyed. That means the mother put out casually for the father because she was so attracted to him, and he kept her around.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 09:38 PM
7

This is not it at all. Quite the opposite, in fact. Incels are low status people, mostly men, and it has always been acceptable to harass, intimidate, exclude, and ridicule low status people. As low status men, they are completely harmless and this makes them an even bigger target. It is the same psychology as bullies. Bullies tend to be socially popular, come from stable and comfortable homes (contrary to popular belief), and pick their targets in a predatory manner looking for those who are on…
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 03:39 AM
1

I'm not reading your post it reeks of the piss thing you did with your dad's pants.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:32 AM
1

If it didn't start with no strings attached casual sex, it is a prostitutive exchange.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:30 AM
1

Who are you speaking to? Which fantasy person in your head are you addressing? Why argue dishonestly by inventing a strawman like a rat instead of being a human being and being honest? Why do YOU view sex as something others work for to be owed, which is inherently implicit in needing to "wait" for any purpose? Ultimately you know you're a dishonest weasel, and the only thing to say to you is this: cum and piss, piss and cum.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:20 AM
1

The most plowed through spunk buckets are highly conservative Christian churchgoing women saving themselves. Churchchad gets around. Stop trying to pretend a woman magically becomes an asexual pure princess when she tries to maintain a positive public facing social image by attending Church and larping muh trad conservative values. Values don't mean anything to women.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:18 AM
2

It became free and readily available well before the takeoff of virginity rates among young men.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:17 AM
9

Simp cuck
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:16 AM
3

Antisocial personality traits (the definition of "rancid personalities") especially fear/danger inducing ones are all universally shown to increase the odds of a man obtaining casual sex with women, not decrease them.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:13 AM
1

Your dogma is fascinating. I admire you religious zealotry.
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:12 AM
9

He discovered she's in love with the few physical genetic factors that coincide with the blackpill. But I know you're just being a dishonest rat teehee
/r/AllPillDebate10/11/23 01:11 AM
1

No, he was pretty specific about growing tall with a lot of hair and no skin imperfections, not a deceptive hysterical retraction to a broader vague category of "growing up" that might include things that have no impact (everything that is not genetic). Are you an illiterate? Did your dad piss your pants that much?
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 11:31 PM
2

We are atomized. So is everyone else. There's a lot of good discussion of the fact that social communities have next to no overlap. Most people don't know anyone different from them IRL, their social groups are pretty much all sociosexually identical people. The kicker is that women are all sociosexually in the same group (chadsex cumdump harems, some of which transition into LTRs and marriage, the rest eventually get recycled into other groups, and then they pipe up after this process and say "…
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 09:19 PM
2

What a simp. Grow a pair and a spine, wimpy flea.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 09:18 PM
8

Dating/relationships come after casual sex. Stop promoting cuckoldry. No man who has any self-respect has a "dating/relationship" plan. He has a get-laid plan and if she's worth it you keep her around plan.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 09:14 PM
-5

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 09:13 PM
-2

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 09:13 PM
7

It's too late. Your pants are as pissed as your dad's. There's no relief.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 09:00 PM
3

None of these things exist. Touch grass. Stop capping. Get it together.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 08:10 PM
9

Opposite, actually. Low IQ in men is a positive indicator of sexual experience with women. As is chronic unemployment. The data is set in stone on this.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 08:09 PM
7

There is no such thing as an "incel community". You are neurotic and schizophrenic.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 08:08 PM
8

Be the tall handsome guy(s) coincidentally around when they decide to give it up in their early to mid 20s.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 07:32 PM
15

Not only that but they're trying to paint him as a moral demon its completely bizarre.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 07:29 PM
20

Women start having sex with their peer group in their early teens, and really start sexually "exploring" by their late teens (at the latest). There are outliers, but they're incredibly rare. You know by your early teens if women are physically attracted to you.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 07:14 PM
0

All the evidence that has and can ever exist demonstrates with no room for argument that height is the single most potent factor in male attractiveness to women. That's all there is to it. I will not be entertaining your replies.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 06:59 PM
0

He's not tall in the west. This story seems to go strongly against the blackpill. Sneed cope cum. You piss your pants with your dad. Simple as.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 06:59 PM
2

Except the receiver in the case of sex as being discussed from the beginning is the man, not the woman. The person who imposes the waiting is not the receiver, they're the giver. They're not the one doing the waiting. I have no idea what point you're making. Then you're slow, no two ways about it. But I think we both know you're a habitual liar. ...what? Huh? What? Huh? Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 06:53 PM
0

Men aren't utilities to be manipulated into cold calculated "relationships" by dangling the eventual reward (how you see it implicitly) of sex.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 06:48 PM
0

If your employer told you to wait an indeterminate amount of time from now to never for your next paycheck because they don't know how they feel about you, what would you do? Would you piss your pants with your dad?
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 06:47 PM
2

Nah, cope.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 06:44 PM
5

cope
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:51 PM
5

Lemme guess, your phone just died.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:51 PM
3

Only if it wasn't a prostitutive exchange following a date or date(s). If it was casual sex, its a good indication she finds him attractive and then he can proceed from there, but if there were dates first it means shes going through the motions coldly/in a routine and there's no real/passionate attraction. Dead bedroom resentful marriage guaranteed.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:45 PM
0

nah, if a woman finds you attractive she'll tolerate/excuse/appreciate your negative behaviors. if she's whining about your negative behaviors, you're a timepig/paypig and she doesn't find you attractive to start with.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:42 PM
2

So you want to piss your pants with your own dad, but then you mald that he wants it to be the same pair of pants you're pissing together???
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:42 PM
1

Sure, if a woman is willing to undergo those BDSM scenes with the ropes and machines and pinching implements and breathing stuff and all that weird crap, plus down a bucket of jizz (at least a gallon, might have herpes in it) from strange men. I'll let her peg me. The two are roughly equal in extremes. Never done either before. But we both know women do wild kinky pornstyle sex with men they find genuinely attractive, and on a first-night casual basis as well. Thats where most of the amateur "co…
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:39 PM
1

The biggest premarital spunk dumpsters you'll ever meet are churchgoing Christian girls. Churchchad has had gangbangs with them.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:25 PM
5

Never transfer financial resources to women.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:24 PM
3

Waiting for a serious relationship for sex isn’t “manipulate [grammar] and control”. Only if you're a virgin, sweetie. Casual sex (sex outside marriage) is a fundamental part of the porn-brained dynamic and once you're not a virgin you're no longer "waiting for a serious relationship for sex". You've already had it. You can't wait for things you've already had, that's literal nonsense.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:22 PM
4

In the same way as candy or cigarettes or beer. Yes, it reshapes parts of the brain slowly. Then again, so does sociosexual exclusion. Much more brutally. And if porn takes the edge off of that, its fine. There's only so much hamster wheel spinning and missing out on once in a lifetime time/age bound sociosexual developmental milestones that a person can be expected to tolerate completely pornsober.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 04:19 PM
6

You'll be fine, but you won't get it as easy as the guys who are a league above you. You're average height, athletic, with a handsome face. That's good enough for dates and long term stuff, but you might struggle with getting genuine romantic love/casual sex.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 01:18 AM
4

I’ve been attracted to plenty of short men. If two identical men, apart form height, were presented as potential partners that you had to choose from, which would you select? and I don’t have a racial or height preference. It is an inherent biological thing to have, not a preference. It's not something you choose. The majority of men, for example, are 5'10" and under, so if you've ever had casual sex and truly had no height preference, it should fall along the height proportions of the male popu…
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 01:15 AM
14

No. But expressed preference and reproductive data show that, when she has the option to, that's who she screws and marries. Its just that most women don't have that option to have long term committed relationships or marry men like that. Dating is also sort of secondary to casual sex, which is how women show genuine romantic attraction instead of the negotiated interest of waiting until after dates.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 01:11 AM
9

Recently divorced single mom from my childhood that hit me up and now suddenly finds my "personality" interesting and my sense of humor endlessly funny, when there was zero sexual tension more than a decade ago when we were teens together. She dropped this line on me about her ex.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 12:39 AM
3

Brilliant post. Confidence is solely a product of peer approval, not the cause of it. If a solo confident behavior seems out of place relative to a man's appearance (height, facial handsomeness, race) it will provoke consistent and severe group hostility toward him. If it lines up, it will be praised, rewarded, accomodated, etc. It is just negative and positive reinforcement of distinct behaviors that, over time, accumulate into the general concept of insecurity/timidity or confidence.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 12:31 AM
5

Its not simply trendy. This casual sex ordering of people is what women prefer, that's why it's the norm now. Even women who complain endlessly about it, prefer it.
/r/AllPillDebate09/11/23 12:12 AM
4

The common response to this is: why would feminism serve the interests of men when its a group that women banded together to make and promote to help women? men should band together and make a group to support male interests. There are some obvious major issues with this counter-argument: 1) Feminism's earliest thinkers and promoters were men, who held all the political and intellectual power. 2) All of the fundamental rights granted to women were done so graciously and generously by men, who ag…
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 11:20 PM
7

Yeah, and it just so happens to be coldly growing in a calculated way that benefits them and their goals exclusively. Odd how thats always the case.
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 11:10 PM
7

This is true. The women I talk to IRL, Americans I've known for years who come from educated middle and upper-middle class backgrounds in white socially liberal communities, all talk about their sexual histories in a whispered, shameful way. Even with me, someone they've known for almost 20 years. None of them advertise it, but they'll talk about it if they get comfortable. And they always have a boatload of excuses they shove into the conversation pre-empetively, trying to keep ahead of any pro…
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 11:04 PM
1

They are not more relatable if IQ distance is a determinant of relatableness. 70 IQ is as statistically different from the average woman as is 130. which is probably an advantage in having children in the lower socio-economic classes. Low IQ men are more sexually popular with women of all socio-economic classes and levels of intelligence and attainment.
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 10:28 PM
13

Yeah, I'm thinking OP just wants to be a victim. Did he even try to put on his personality stilts and his charisma jaw filler?
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 08:00 PM
2

I find the women and simps there denying reality with things like "but yeah, but but but women won't date him they'll just give him hot kinky no strings attached sex" to be pretty funny and transparent. It comes off exactly the same as the women/simps who tell a guy being approached by an obese single mother of four that "she might have gone to bed with HIM, but she's going home with YOU. isn't that so heckin wholesome, y'all" Also the "sex isn't a reward" copers are particularly hilarious. Sex …
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 05:13 PM
6

If anecdotes are good for the goose, my dear pants pissing frightened dunce, they're good for the gander. Sneed and cum. Condemn the use of anecdotes in all reasoning or seethe helplessly. Makes no difference.
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 05:02 PM
8

Why are you sacred to just communicate forthrightly and feel the need to follow up your comment with a tension dispelling "lol"? Don't be scared.
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 05:01 PM
4

People find it hard to relate to others when the gap in IQ is too large, and it works both ways. And since women tend to heavily cluster around the mean, and men are more present at the extremes, it makes sense that men with high IQs would be isolated and alone. However, this explanation breaks down completely because men with IQs of 70 are as rare and unrelatable as men with IQs of 130, and yet men with IQs of 70 are highly sexually popular with women of all intelligence levels, accounting for …
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 05:00 PM
5

Yep, and their consistent forgiveness for pedoChad from the Chadfishing experiments, and how they all reframed his crimes as a "mistake" to be learned from, is particularly disturbing and disgusting.
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 04:55 PM
5

The heightpill is the most statistically verified, settled and impactful of any "pills". There are thousands of high quality studies going back a century on the effects of height on social status, sexual access, marital odds, marital success, income, promotions, etc. You don't even need stories like what you've found here for it. And that's not even touching on unverifiable personal/lived experiences/anecdotes (the main anti-blackpill form of argument).
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 02:16 PM
2

Simp
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 02:09 PM
14

Women are particularly insistent that their sexual arousal is a moral estimator. It's pretty insane. That's why creepy = ugly and things like that.
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 02:08 PM
6

Any journal of biology, social psychology, sociology, etc. is a blackpill journal. Sometimes people organize related studies into books and these are blackpill books if they concern human reproductive or sexual habits.
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 04:19 AM
5

What a simp
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 04:19 AM
12

Have you tried being [personal or one in a trillion famous historical anecdote]? Huh? Have you inchel? Stop trusting the science and start trusting the random name or personal life story I drop.
/r/AllPillDebate08/11/23 04:14 AM
1

The goofy guy up top is very tall.
/r/AllPillDebate07/11/23 10:42 PM
3

It used to be all dime pieces in Hollywood. The mid-push is a recent phenomenon, at least on a large scale.
/r/AllPillDebate07/11/23 10:42 PM
1

I agree, having a bunch of people wanting to give you free delicious food sucks. Don't they want to stick around and cook in your kitchen instead, creating a giant mess? How unfulfilling to just have the fun pleasure part of life and not the godawful part.
/r/AllPillDebate07/11/23 09:07 PM
1

In a lot of places the formal dating that exists in the popular American conception is not real. People sort of hang out and then have sex and proceed from there, without ever arranging to meet alone or anything like that, especially not for dinner at a restaurant or coffee somewhere. But the sex should happen fast. First day is a good indication that she can ever really have a healthy romantic love based relationship with you. After a couple days those odds go down to pretty much 0. Its now the…
/r/AllPillDebate07/11/23 07:09 PM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate07/11/23 04:24 AM
6

The hardest you've ever worked was when you were working it pissing your pants with your dad LMAO
/r/AllPillDebate07/11/23 04:23 AM
1

No, not really, not as in the historical movement. It is just the collection of data and studies, especially those that have been replicated and peer reviewed (that is, settled science) that describe sociosexual success in people. It could describe anything in that domain. So long as it is scientific it is the blackpill. Human individuals are sexually reproducing organisms, and sexual selection is a type of natural selection. It is a definitional thing that, if what you describe as the definitio…
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 10:21 PM
5

if he’s happy, can’t hate A dog on a leash is happy. If the goal is eternal happiness until the end, then your religion is narcotics.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 10:13 PM
2

No. Every voice should be included in the discussion. Censorship is an anti-blackpill/anti-science position.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 10:09 PM
13

He smells more like pissed pants.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 10:05 PM
13

Yeah, behavior in general is most jarring when it's out of place or unexpected. Men who aren't tall or handsome are slotted into "background object", "asexual personthing", and "pseudofriend/utility" categories by women without any self-reflection most of the time, so it's very jarring and disturbing when one of these things you barely noticed existed and was just a background object is voicing human desires and concerns. Totally out of place and bizarre. Like if a potted plant started talking t…
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 10:03 PM
2

As soon as suffrage was universal, a certain demographic began voting almost only the taller candidate into office, regardless of other qualities. What a world.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 09:35 PM
3

Based reasonable reality accepter. I hope you find something you can call success with your -maxxing attempt.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 08:25 PM
12

How much of this advice pertains to getting it (no strings attached casual sex) when it actually matters and has nothing to do with effort based attainment (before your early 20s, and especially before any career)? The rest would be cope by definition, and I don't read cope. Sorry champ. The general rule of thumb is that the longer and more neurotic an argument is, the more wrong it is. There is only one argument needed: height and face. Simple as.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 08:22 PM
2

It's a rough thing, and though I discourage the use of leg lengthening for the obvious risks, he made his choice and saw it through. It's so grueling, he must have had a very strong spirit. It is a lot less painful for someone to receive HGH before the fusion of epiphyseal plates, but you will again need a doctor's prescription for that and they will not give it oftentimes even for people who are extremely stunted, even though short stature in men is nearly as potent a risk for suicide due to th…
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 07:41 PM
1

Works similarly, yes.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 05:15 PM
7

If she isn't eager for your dick, you're a timepig/paypig. It doesn't matter if it's "for you" or not.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 01:45 PM
1

Yep, its no surprise that immigrants form ethnic enclaves for relief from the majority demographic, when they're so automatically hostile from the very start. They should continue to milk settler colonial countries and send remittances back to their nations of origin. Keep mixing to a minimum and keep the money flowing.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 01:13 PM
5

It isn't a "fatalistic outlook" it's just whatever the settled science has to say about sociosexual success. There is no such thing as "adopting the blackpill worldview". You are either a science denier (anti-blackpill) or not. The settled science doesn't vanish because it makes you have the bad fee fee foo foos.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 12:59 PM
3

Your first date outside of coincidentally meeting at a group thing like a party or concert, should be a night of fucking. Until you know she is sexually excited by you, you're a simp if you spend any money on her.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 12:27 PM
1

It's just a facet of the "racepill", the third strongest pill behind the "heightpill" and the facepill".
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 04:05 AM
3

Nah, it's absolutely gender relations. The races that women are physically repulsed by on account of height and facial handsomeness in a culture are never-can-do-good in the eyes of both the men and women of that culture, and the races that women of a culture find attractive are elevated and never-can-do-wrong in the eyes of the men and women of that culture. Women use this social power to punish men they find physically repulsive on a whim. It's the classic lesson of "To Kill a Mockingbird" and…
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 04:02 AM
3

Do you and your dad share the same pair of pants when you piss together?
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 03:53 AM
11

Yep, if someone tells you that you just gotta put yourself out there or some such nonsense, you know its a woman pushing lies or a really ugly/short guy.
/r/AllPillDebate06/11/23 02:12 AM
5

Tall women are extreme height fetishists. Short women are even extremer height fetishists.
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 09:32 PM
2

Men caring for each other in any functional goal-oriented way is called misogyny, as it naturally leads to a patriarchy. The things short ugly men are lacking, are things that men compete over. If men collaborated to make arranged marriages and such the only legal form of marriage, it would just return us to the pre-20th century societies that always existed, which were terrible for half of the world's population. Men caring for each other and putting their desires before women's desires was the…
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 04:30 PM
3

That's not how it works, my terrified pants pisser. Lack of positive selection for a trait generally leads to a lower prevalence of that specific trait in a population. It doesn't matter if tall handsome guys aren't dumber, if the selection is independent of intelligence. Tall handsome guys who are stupid are just as likely (actually more likely, by the data) to have kids and reproduce than tall handsome guys who are intelligent.
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 04:28 PM
4

A simp is an aspiring bb.
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 03:49 PM
10

Endless preening (gym rats, fashion obsession, skincare routines à la Patrick Bateman, even makeup) has turned millennial and gen z men into "the beautiful ones". You will always get this when you have a thousand men competing for one woman, as is functionally the case with the simulated dating environments online that account for over half of formed relationships, more than 90% of hookups, and are thus the cultural norm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 03:47 PM
7

Women like tall and handsome men. How those men act/behave/think/etc. is irrelevant to the main aspect of sociosexual interaction: hookup/casual sex.
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 12:57 PM
0

We can go by the reproductive data and find that yes, all men find even obese pig faced grannies attractive, the least attractive group of women to ever exist, and thus find all more attractive women (including average, overweight princess women) attractive.
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 12:16 PM
11

People are used to using motivated/ideological reasoning (like when bluepill types lie to women in desperate skeevy attempts to get laid), so telling anti-blackpill/anti-science types that there is no motivation, it's just observation and acceptance, will really annoy them. Regardless of who "takes" the blackpill, the facts of it remain separate and independent from any decisions made. A person who hasn't "taken" the blackpill is still living in that inescapable world of facts called the blackpi…
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 12:11 PM
1

Don't be scared of the sneed cum, darling. Your pissed pants will dry in time, and your injured emotions will settle.
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 12:06 PM
1

This guy pisses his pants with his dad.
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 12:03 PM
16

No, of course he doesn't want a gf. He is a eunuch asexual non-human thing, not a man who just happens to so short women are repulsed by him so he can't access a basic biological need for proper psychosocial and neurological development that can never occur in its absence during a very narrow window of time.
/r/AllPillDebate05/11/23 12:03 PM
5

Yep. You can't set up a short ugly man with a woman who wants him - women do not want short ugly men by definition. You would just be setting up an unhappy "relationship" that was doomed for a dead bedroom situation, infidelity, or dissolution. His other qualities could be 10/10, and there may be women interested, but interest is not attraction. You cannot negotiate genuine sexual desire, and a relationship is not a romantic relationship unless that is present. Short ugly guys already have all t…
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 10:28 PM
1

Except that, with the proliferation of international travel and hookup apps, she is surrounded by 6'4" handsome model tier men no matter who she is, no matter where she is, anywhere in the world. Even Granny in Indonesia or Botswana. I get what you're saying though. Their attraction is highly deindividuated. It's all about where you fit in the pack of men. They don't want a man taller than them (the cop out used in arguments), they want a man taller than the other men they've seen/met. They don'…
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 06:11 PM
2

No, pursuit of "the spark" is the definition of romantic love based relationships. There is no generic relationship. Without "the spark" you are talking about relationships arranged for other reasons that aren't romantic, that is, arranged relationships/marriages.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 03:20 PM
1

This whole post is turds in a toilet bowl because your point of view is literal insect tier worthlessness. Post the reproductive stats or get a grip, moron.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 11:23 AM
4

No, that's platonic love. Romantic love is when she gets excited by the first sight of you and needs to fuck as soon as possible. There's no "how would you define love?" Those are the objective definitions that exist outside the reach of personal definitions. Platonic love is NOT romantic love. There is no overlap.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 11:21 AM
3

You can't have a healthy romantic relationship without "the spark". What she's suggesting is already practiced: in Saudi Arabia, India, etc. If loveless arranged marriages are your thing, you can get one today. "The spark" is literally just the baseline minimum of physical attraction that can ever develop into genuine romantic love.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 11:20 AM
4

This is some elite level ghetto cope. Or is the AAVE an affected racist way of communicating for you?
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 11:09 AM
2

They are neurotypical incels for ethnic/racial reasons, that's why. And the white guys you're noticing are neurodivergent.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 11:06 AM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 02:05 AM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 02:05 AM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 02:04 AM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 02:04 AM
3

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 02:04 AM
3

It was like this 10 years ago too. If you're not very tall and handsome, you are going to be waiting for when she's done riding the rotisserie. And you'll be lucky if she doesn't have a divorce and a handful of kids she carts along to your dates at McDonalds (because the kids won't eat anything else). Good luck to you. You missed out on the best parts of youthful, intimate love with a girl your own age because of your genes. Just grind a little more bro, y'all maybe. And y'all maybe bro will gri…
/r/AllPillDebate04/11/23 02:00 AM
2

Spot on.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 08:03 PM
8

Other way around. "The ick" is when an ugly guy tries to get away with doing anything/existing around women. It is just another way of saying creepy/gross. Attractive men never cause "the ick", and the reproductive data is very clear on that.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 08:00 PM
9

That's because I grinded, bro, at least once more than they do. Y'all.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 04:53 PM
5

I don't "know this". It just is. You'll have to drop the strange reframing language. That sort of hysterical communication style only works when you're putting out for the person suffering it. It mocks that subset of genetic losers who still exclude incels from their conception of themselves, despite being ideologically similar in all the essential ways. Any left leaning person who is not adoringly and lovingly promoting blackpill ideas is an ideologically incoherent loser.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 04:41 PM
21

No bro y'all, just grind y'all bro maybe, just maybe grind y'all bro don't be weak bro y'all maybe. If you grind bro y'all maybe y'all wouldn't be so lonely like weak y'all maybe bro.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 01:49 PM
25

It's disturbing for both of them. Neither look happy. He probably feels guilty that she is stuck with him, and she feels repulsed/disgusted in a way that can never be overcome because of his ugly genetics.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 01:41 PM
10

Anything that makes people feel left out, like earning a high income and studying at elite institutions, is taboo to brag about and people have entire political movements dedicated to their bitter seething jealousy over these things. Especially income disparities. Incomecels (income redistributionists/socialists/etc.) were considered bizarre dangerous freaks at the turn of the 20th century, but have gained a lot of acceptance since then. As have academiccels (government education grant supporter…
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 01:31 PM
0

Because maybe y'all ugly disabled disturbed maybe y'all women have no trouble maybe y'all reproducing and finding lifelong maybe y'all partners and love, because maybe y'all men love women much more radically and maybe y'all totally than women love men. The settled maybe y'all science on this is maybe y'all clear: autistic women are maybe y'all more sociosexually successful than maybe y'all neurotypical men. Also maybe y'all, I never mentioned any behavioral maybe y'all traits being selected aga…
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 01:03 PM
5

True, words I personally don't hear don't even exist. I'm king god myself, ultra emperor king god. Things stop existing just on the basis that I personally didn't hear them. I'm that special. LMAO moron.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 12:57 PM
2

Nah, there isn't, and no, you don't. Simple as.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 12:56 PM
3

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 12:53 PM
3

He made a big post on a now deleted alt-account where he talked about being into watersports while dressed since college, and that it didn't "count as sex" because he and his dad were still wearing pants while it was happening. Or so I've heard.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 12:49 PM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 12:43 PM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 12:43 PM
13

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 12:41 PM
20

Yeah, autism is 1-2% of men, and that's possibly an overestimate. Most guys who are socially awkward are socially awkward because they were excluded from social development before people even start forming coherent memories, on account of physical features their peer girls found repulsive. And once puberty hits, boys won't hang around other boys if girls shame them for it.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 11:34 AM
0

Yeah and he can lick up a bull's cum from his wife while he's at it! Great cuckold advice, pants pisser!
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 11:08 AM
2

All the "focus on yourself" copers are hilarious. Everyone is 24/7 focusing on themselves, all the time since birth for their whole lives. That is how brains work, morons.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 11:02 AM
1

Aren't you that guy that did pants pissing stuff with his own dad?
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 11:01 AM
4

Hey, I know you. You're that guy who shared that story about doing pants pissing with his own dad.
/r/AllPillDebate03/11/23 10:57 AM
2

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 10:18 PM
3

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 10:17 PM
3

Yep, it's why anti-blackpill types are so nasty and have such ugly shriveled souls.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 09:23 PM
1

Yeah, the shop I go to has a downer from South Asia who works also as a janitor. He is straight up 4' 3" tall and slays.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 08:47 PM
3

Inadequate force of piss stream from his dad? Listen, bud. Not everyone is into that.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 08:42 PM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 08:40 PM
4

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 08:40 PM
2

Not at all, having experienced how opportunistic it is if you're not a tall handsome man. The women who leeched off me in terms of time, experience, money, etc. when we were young and who are now, as we've entered our 30s, coming back around and whining to me about their inadequate tall handsome partners they had kids with before leaving/divorcing (because he wasn't putting any effort in the marriage) and telling me what a great partner I'd be for them, have freed me of the feeling that I'm miss…
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 08:37 PM
10

You're talking to a guy who does pants pissing things with his own dad. Don't waste your time.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 08:25 PM
1

Whatever the settled science shows results in significantly reduced sociosexual success relative to the peak success effect of tall height. It's somewhere under 6' and over 5' 8".
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 07:26 PM
1

And Benedict Cumberbatch. Being short is enough is enough to be ugly, even if you have a handsome face. Women consider height to part of the overall attractiveness package, and it is 90% of that package.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 07:18 PM
-1

Nah.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 06:48 PM
9

Yep, "Chad" is shorthand for genetic qualities that can't be imitated or earned. Height and handsome face are all there is to being a "Chad". Women will lick the garbage juice rot cheese from the tip of a tall handsome homeless autistic drug addict who mumbles and can't make eye contact, and recoil in disgust from a handsome wealthy put together charismatic confident professional short/ugly man.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 06:29 PM
3

Lesbians are notoriously chadsexual. Its interesting to watch their eyes light up and their nervous habits escalate in the presence of a tall handsome man, across the board.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 06:25 PM
1

The traits that matter for genuine sexual attraction and thus genuine romantic love and any healthy long term relationship/marriage with women, are tall height and handsome face in men. Two genetic factors. The rest of the things you listed generate interest. Interest is not attraction, and its important not to confuse the two. They are actually unrelated. A woman can be totally interested in a man for a relationship, and be completely unattracted to him sexually at the same time. To tell the di…
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 06:21 PM
7

Agreed, lots of single tall handsome guys just have women on rotation as fuck toys in soft harems now, instead of forming relationships. As a result, all other men are single and sexless.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 06:18 PM
3

No kids Gotta be honest, if you don't put kids in your wife you're setting yourself up for this. She's probably sad and depressed that she missed out on the best years for having and raising children. Marriage without kids is like a meal without food. Marriage was literally invented as a shell concept for having and raising children. All the things associated with it (love, romance, etc.) are post hoc idealizations.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 03:34 PM
1

This is correct. Variability could be very low to non-existent in an infinite set.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 03:28 PM
1

No, infinitely large does not mean infinitely varied. There are no known probabilities for repetition of phenomena. It is just as likely to be the same thing repeated infinitely many times on repeat as it is to be varied infinitely. Most likely (assuming your premise of an infinite universe is true) it is uninterestingly infinitely varied - the probability of things like ourselves being so low that not only do we not re-occur, anything interesting is incredibly rare to begin with. Also there is …
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 03:27 PM
1

That's not the way in which relationships should be formed in the first place Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 03:22 PM
0

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 03:21 PM
4

Why are you doubting his story, bro? He's talking about his slaya' friend who plays the field just like you bruh. He's totally not making stuff up bruh. Are you saying people who talk about being slaya's on the internet are full of crap?
/r/AllPillDebate02/11/23 03:20 PM
0

They're scared of the sneed cum.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:38 PM
-1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:37 PM
7

She never stopped.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 04:07 PM
0

Sorry, now that I know you're from a micropopulous nation with no identity of its own that is just eternally suckling at the tip of my country's flaccid member, I can't take you seriously. Better luck next time, champ. I wish you the best luck spreading your religion of science denialism. Eat a slice of obscure smelly cheese and jerkied whale in memory of this exchange.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 04:05 PM
6

I don't think the scientific method, synonymous with the blackpill, is about cherrypicking. Is anti-science rhetoric the core of your ideology?
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 03:32 PM
8

How common would you say these relationships are? 50%? 10%? 1%? If it's under 1%, what exactly are you expecting people to explain? Why they're so incredibly rare and unusual and unlikely and outliers? Even further, what percent of these outliers do you think formed out of casual sex hookups with the disabled guy when both the man and woman were young and just looking for real genuine attraction based sexual fun/thrill and not cold calculated decisions or fears of being alone now that Chad hadn'…
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 03:10 PM
4

The ideal male body to women is tall with a handsome face. Let's say you start with a base male template, average in all respects. To achieve it, you need a minimum of a dozen excruciating bone breaking surgeries. How is putting makeup on and not eating like a pig even close? Most men don't do this naturally, because it would be an incredible course of self-harm and self-hatred to change to be physically attractive to women. And even if you only consider men who do things that don't actually mak…
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 02:34 PM
8

You might feel that way, but the settled science says height >>>> all other factors combined.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 02:05 PM
0

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 11:30 AM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 11:27 AM
20

They can't help it. That's literally how they construct arguments. Its how they argue interpersonally as well, with their partners. It isn't about honesty, the truth, etc. it's about feeling right. That's all. Don't engage them, they aren't interested in the truth. Telling them they're doing their strawman tactic, is pointless. They know what they're doing. They don't care. It's not about honesty. They'll just pretend they don't know what you're saying.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 11:26 AM
3

It's true. Relationships are nothing. Any paypig/simp/loser can get a relationship at 30+ with a desperate recently divorced single mom. Casual sex when you're both young and exploring together is where all the value and meaning is in sociosexual/romantic interactions with women. All that potential for shared first experiences and novelty, the only thing that can build genuine romantic intimacy, is gone by the time she's 21 or around that age. Same for you, by the way. Even if you didn't get any…
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:14 AM
0

Nobody engages with you seriously because you have a weirdly effeminate and hysterical way of communicating. Get a grip, and stop doing that pants pissing thing with your dad.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:10 AM
1

Sneed cum
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:08 AM
1

Genuine cum.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:07 AM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:07 AM
0

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:06 AM
1

Betabux is when its acquired through casual dating. Arranged marriage is just a form of prostitution.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:05 AM
3

No it isn't. Unless he wants an unhappy paypig arrangement. That's no different than paying prostitutes.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:05 AM
2

Yes, it is a singular dimension. All tests and measures of intelligence, all describable real honest genuine aspects of intelligence that aren't bullshit, when analyzed, show that they all filter down to one singular genetic factor that is consistent across measurements: g.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:03 AM
4

No she isn't. The employment data does not reflect this. The trades are massively understaffed and are having trouble recruiting young men. They are completely dropping out. She is a pants pisser with her dad, don't trust her nonsense.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 10:00 AM
20

Nah, it doesn't matter for sexual desire at all. If it did, Indian and Chinese men would be the most desired men in places like the US. It just makes you a better simp paypig target at 30+.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 09:58 AM
1

LMAO such pathetic simp cuckold cope
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 09:31 AM
8

According to all the evidence that exists, yes. It is settled science that height is the single most potent factor in predicting male sociosexual success with women, and lots of other things in life as well. It goes: height >>> face >>> race >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voluntary/effort based factors (less than 5% of predictive power). An incompetent, unconfident tall man is more likely to get raises and promotions at work (especially if the managers/HR are female) than a brilliantly competen…
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 09:23 AM
30

OMG honey nooo! Don't tell him nooo! Every woman (with an ugly/short partner) has done this! Its heckerino normalerino to psychologically cuckold your husband! He probably loves it honey! NOooo you can't tell him the truth about your psychology and genuine desires, noooo. It might have negative consequences for you. You getting what you want all the time no matter what is more important than your literal life partner being treated like a human being allowed to make an informed choice.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 09:21 AM
3

Nah bro be honest now bro. Like bro, racists will tell you straight up "Dawg, I'm racist, you are [slur]" bro. None of them will be passive aggressive or communicate through their actions/choices rather than words bro. Don't engage with the bad faith dishonest vermin like her.
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 09:17 AM
9

Damn, the earth never starts talking and tells me mass exerts a force called gravity that keeps me on its surface. Yet it still exerts gravity. Weird how that works. Do you still do that pants pissing thing with your dad?
/r/AllPillDebate01/11/23 09:16 AM
4

This is another thing copers do. Try to mimic your way of talking as if they're women in a relationship with you arguing with you. Honey, if you aren't putting out for us, you can't pull that off.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 08:26 PM
1

Nah, in basic math the term "independent" has implications for probabilistic calculations. You weren't aware of it so I was teaching you about the concept. It's best not to double down when you're being corrected, unless you're performing for other fools and don't care about truth. Simple as.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 08:19 PM
3

No, inchellus, you don't understand. Its not creepy when he does it. LMAO
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 08:18 PM
0

I've never seen such intense cuck cope simping from anyone before.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 08:17 PM
2

None of those qualities are independent. His odds of existing are probably a fair bit higher.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:48 PM
2

It's just about being large in general. Women want large men in the genetic sense. Tall, broad shoulders, large wrists, etc.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:47 PM
2

Yep, just keep spinning on your slave simp hamster wheel until you're burned out in your mid 40s and a gold digger wants to suck your blood and leave you two years later. The core sociosexual experiences are all over by 21. No man who has to moverino ontoerino heckerino controllerino issuerino is going to access them, and once you missed out you are screwed for life. Be a man and face reality.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:46 PM
1

That's taller than 95% of men. That's even more brutal than the common blackpill.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:44 PM
1

I love how you simp cuckolds contradict each other. Your spam/subreddit raiding partner just got done saying these women are mid/average. Now they're attractive. LMAO you guys can't keep your ideas straight. Pants pissing with your dads has addled your minds.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:43 PM
2

Sex without being the simpslave that the men she finds ugly have to be to sleep with her, is literally the sociosexual definition of winning.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:42 PM
3

How many would he let own his time, money, and energy? Why would he want to lose/punish himself that way? Casual sex is the fun part. Being a simpslave (dating) women is the punishment part, reserved for men who they hate if they couldn't get the men they really want (the men they give casual sex to).
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:41 PM
4

situationship After you grow out of your teens, you stop using heckin tumblerino language. Don't be infantile, and stop doing that pants pissing thing with your dad.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:39 PM
6

Relationships are about a partnership, not someone just build to attend to your needs and your needs alone Nope, relationships are about a woman finding you blindingly sexually arousing and latching onto you for dear life. Not about cold calculated moves to turn you into a simpcuckchump ("relationship") because her preferred man wouldn't commit.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:38 PM
9

That's pretty clearly false from your history. Dishonesty is a bad start. Come clean and say you're an ideologue pushing your cultlike beliefs, and there will be a starting point. Until you can face that about yourself, you are a bad faith participant and everyone can see it.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:37 PM
10

And his unwashed, sweaty addict, beautiful lack of hygiene.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:36 PM
15

Yep, it makes perfect sense anyway. Most men are not tall and handsome. Women find only tall and handsome men sexually attractive. Thus, most women will not find their husbands sexually attractive.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:34 PM
6

Height and face. Simple as.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:33 PM
1

Not reading all this cope, champ. It's written in a feminine and attention desperate style. Be a man. Communicate like a man.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:33 PM
6

More height, more handsome face.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:32 PM
2

No one knows what you're trying to communicate with your hysterical, sniveling scared pants pissing riddle. That's why you're a joke.
/r/AllPillDebate31/10/23 03:30 PM
2

Nope, thousands of years of evidence points to it being face and height. Sorry champ, that's just the way it is.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 08:52 PM
1

He does mog him in all those areas. Wealthy career minded hot women will wife his brother up and provide for him. It will happen.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 08:51 PM
3

Don't be a creep trying to dictate other peoples lives and reactions.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 08:50 PM
5

Confidence is irrelevant if you are tall and handsome (what attractive means to women). They'll aggressively pursue the spergiest, most socially disabled tall handsome men who can't make eye contact and men who drool on themselves. Confidence is coincidental byproduct of being treated this way by women, not a causal factor of being treated this way by women. It is just a trait to point at after the fact and pretend it had an impact to avoid feeling bad.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 03:47 PM
2

This is true, if you arrange marriages based on things like career, intellect, personalities, which is how it is done in most of the world, then you will end up with an unattractive population. And you will also rapidly find anti-blackpill types supporting various kinds of arranged marriages in order to avoid feeling wrong. If you select a partner based on anything other than falling romantically in love with them, like same race or religion or anything, you are creating an arranged relationship…
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 03:26 PM
8

Why is boring all effort based positive sociological qualities, and being exciting to women is all negative innate sociological qualities like rapist/predator/violent/aggressive? This is a neuropsychological defect in women. It is grotesque and shameful. Lazy simps and cuckolds like yourself are strangers to the idea of effort and earned success.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 03:18 PM
6

Nah, they like unearned aggressiveness when it comes with tall height and a handsome face. If women liked sociosexual confidence in any meaningful/scalable way, middle aged Indian guys from remote villages who just learned how to access facebook and instagram would be considered the ultimate slayers and players. If they liked competence or career based confidence, the nerdy successful Chinese doctors and engineers would be laying pipe from their formative early teen years onward. Women like disp…
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 03:15 PM
3

They're shorthand terms for ways of looking at the world. Bluepill: People are inherently kind and good, and success is a function of effort and not luck. The poorest man from the poorest slum in Calcutta can grind and hustle and become the most successful man in the world. Women especially love men who are kind and nice, but also ugly and short, and have wild kinky sex only with these men when they're hot and young. Redpill: Everyone is wearing masks and you need to have the real world revealed…
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 03:07 PM
-5

All this here to say in a thousand words what could be said in a handful: "be a paypig simp cuckold and transfer your wealth to women." No. Don't transfer your wealth to women by buying sex.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 03:01 PM
2

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 02:57 PM
3

Didn't you do that piss pants thing with your dad?
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 02:56 PM
8

This is simp nonsense. The unconditional love of men for women is a major aspect of literature, music, painting, etc. around the world in every culture for thousands of years. It is the ground reality. Men don't just love women unconditionally, they love ugly women unconditionally. Plenty of guys have stories of pining for the fat girl with the weird face in their high school class. There are no stories of women pining for Danny Devito lookalikes in high school. There is no equivalence between t…
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 02:54 PM
2

It has nothing to do with some elaborate cost-benefit calculation. That's post-hoc analysis of an immediate, innate neuropsychological reaction. Women aren't being clever and the point wasn't about "highest genetic material", the females of a sexually reproducing species often sexually select along Fisherian lines and drive their entire species to extinction. They go for pretty, not survival value. It's a sexual instinct. Simple as.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 01:55 PM
1

He seems to have also done that pants pissing thing with his dad that you did.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 07:14 AM
2

pee pee poo poo
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 07:13 AM
33

No, it makes perfect sense. Until the last few thousand years out of several hundred thousand of humans existing (and 205 million years of sexually reproducing ancestral mammals that preceded us and gave rise to us), all sexual selection was purely based on physical genetic qualities. Things like currency, education, effort based success, etc. are recent cultural inventions. There's no reason they would be sexually arousing to women at all. Even now, sexual attraction is still wholly based on ph…
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 06:44 AM
0

Australian women are nowhere regarded as some of the most attractive white women in the world. They're nearly as fat as American women, and definitely don't have the reputation for beauty that a lot of European white women do. Have you been back to your country of origin and dated there or nearby? I’d bet you have it alot easier there. Why? Because you’re height and race wouldn’t be an issue. If he's not a literal immigrant then his country of origin is Australia. If he is, then what you're desc…
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 06:16 AM
8

This is cope. The resistance is not because he is not in le magical place. It's because he isn't hitting the beats of tall, handsome, and correct race. Harassing strange women on the beach is not going to get him laid.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 06:13 AM
2

They already started this. There have been waves of banning and scientific article suppression since 2018.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 12:40 AM
5

No subreddit bans discussion of flat earthism as a general rule, because of its lack of prominence. The blackpill is banned because of the body of settled scientific work behind it. The anti-blackpill movement is a luddite anti-science cult movement.
/r/AllPillDebate30/10/23 12:39 AM
3

Nobody is buying your weird pro-cuckold shtick.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:52 PM
2

I remember, you're that guy that wrote about spitting during the pants pissing thing you did with your dad, and how you learned not to do it.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:50 PM
1

True, but Men don’t want to date or fuck ugly women is false. Men fall in deep romantic love with ugly women all the time. Not just that, but 80%+ of men are ugly to women, and less than 10% of women are ugly to men.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:47 PM
2

Not just fuck, date, love and marry. Granny could have men leaving flowers on her doorstep and planning intricate cutesy dates for her with just a single message on Tinder.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:46 PM
1

Nah.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:45 PM
0

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:44 PM
1

Long term commitment is work, not reward. Its like saying "I don't get paid at my job, but at least I get to work!" The part men are picking is the occasional starfish sex, they are enduring the rest of it, because the rest of it has no value. Being a womans simpchumpslave and emotional tampon (long term commitment) is not a reward, it's something men put up with for the sex part.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:44 PM
1

Aren't you the guy that talked about doing "swapping" with his own dad after another man finished?
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:41 PM
2

Nah.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:35 PM
1

Nope.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:35 PM
1

Never has.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:26 PM
2

No, I remember now. You mentioned that you and your dad would do pants pissing stuff together. You said it triggers defensiveness in you when its mentioned, the last time you talked about it.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:16 PM
3

Is sexually diminishing people who are self-evidently uncomfortable with you expressing sexual topics and are also not your friend, part of friendship for women? That's what OP is talking about. So surely you are not being a dishonest ratlike vermin, and you are talking in that context like an honest human-value having person.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:14 PM
0

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:10 PM
2

Aren't you the guy that did pants pissing stuff with his own dad?
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:10 PM
2

Has never happened.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:09 PM
4

Nah, that's a highly neurotic and moronic take that begins with a false premise. If you need that much hysterical spiel to explain your nonsense, you're wrong. Incel just means "loser ugly virgin", and is the current way of using those insults.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 11:08 PM
2

No, what he's saying is that the biological state of your body would still be equally as damaged as it was before, but you would look different. Its not just about the numerical age. You can't reverse the effects of aging, yet. There is significant research in this area. Its a huge project with lots of attention from billionaires who want to extend the natural lifespan, and so progress is being made rapidly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senolytic
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 10:42 PM
3

According to non-blackpill religion, if she feels comfortable around him she'd want to suck him off. He doesn't seem to be reporting that.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 10:39 PM
10

Never happens within the context of OPs post. What a dishonest nasty little ratlike way to try to dilute and pollute the discussion.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 10:38 PM
2

You're wasting your time with those dunces. They are not arguing in good faith. They know you are correct and are trying to push their anti-scientific ideology.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 08:48 PM
5

People think that bodyshaming is okay when the target is a "bad person". Ugly men are axiomatically considered bad people by women. They don't realize that this kind of language and insults affect other people sharing these traits. Yes they do. Expressed morality is a way of signaling belonging and tribal identity for women, not genuinely held and practiced beliefs.
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 08:48 PM
3

Do you and your dad still do that pants pissing thing together?
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 02:08 PM
10

If you have little sexual experience, it's essential to find a woman with similar or less experience compared to you if you want a healthy relationship. If you're a guy with lots of sexual experience, women find that attractive (and the more they say they don't, the more they secretly do find it hot), whereas it functions the opposite way for women. Lots of experience is bad. All it indicates is she's had all the fun she wants to have, has built up lots of "icks" and reservations about more fun/…
/r/AllPillDebate29/10/23 01:54 PM
13

Marriage isn't a toy or game, sweetheart. Its a commitment for life, come rain or shine. There is no such thing as "marriage was over" except for cheaters and prostitutes.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 08:26 PM
16

Prostitute != gf/wife
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 08:22 PM
28

She is what half of all women who are not fat and have no bad substance abuse habits look like in their early 20s.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 08:21 PM
13

This is indeed the common simp/women line. We know this not to be the case because we know the psychological profile of abusers. 1-2% of men have this psychological profile. Yet 25% of women have been abused. What other group do women preferentially date? Tall handsome men. If there wasn't disproportionate overlap between tall handsome men and abusive men, compared to the overlap between short/ugly men and abusive men, then the abuse rates wouldn't be so high among women. They are somehow all en…
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 02:12 PM
5

It functions the same way as women who marry abusive or lazy men. The common line is that its impossible to tell because the morons they marry that can barely string a sentence together are magically also master manipulators. Are you saying that's a lie and women who marry supposedly masking abusers generally know they will eventually be abused? Or are you simping and only holding men to the magical sees the future standard?
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 02:10 PM
0

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 02:01 PM
1

Girlfriends are not the test. Casual sex is the test of real attraction (without which any resulting relationship is meaningless). Girls start hooking up with their peer boys of their own age in their early teens. You know by high school if girls/women find you attractive enough to love. There's no effort or trying or time passage involved.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 12:11 PM
5

What the simp morons are trying to say, is that if you aren't tall and handsome you better not ask any questions and just be a good little simp cuckold. Just disregard them and move on.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 12:10 PM
2

Have for a decade. Six days a week, heavy and high volume. Start with high intensity sets to push my strength higher and then I knock the weight back a bit for drop sets and crank out the volume. I do chest and arms, back, shoulders, rest and repeat. Today I'm doing back. Should add, being fit has little relation to outcomes in a fight. Body mass and fighting experience, on the street or in a gym, are the main determinants of fight outcomes. Muscles are good for practical reasons (moving furnitu…
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 03:25 AM
15

Have you considered being a janitor? I know a 5' 2" custodial engineer of South Asian persuasion who SLAYS bro you just gotta have confidence BRO you just gotta put yourself out there BRO.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 03:13 AM
-2

The poll can't show things that contradict physical reality and the settled replicated peer reviewed science on attraction. The blackpill says that height has more of an impact than all other factors combined. A reddit self-report survey where tons of people from other subreddits vote literally says nothing about anything. No woman ever writes "his maxilla must be x cm protruding" on her Tinder profile. Stop coping. All the poll shows is who is present and posting, and most of the users here are…
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 03:11 AM
2

Multiple girlfriends is not the test. Casual sex is the test real attraction (without which any resulting relationship is meaningless). Girls start hooking up with their peer boys of their own age in their early teens. You know by high school if girls/women find you attractive enough to love. There's no effort or trying or time passage involved.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 03:09 AM
-1

That's worse, that means they're conniving to maintain our good company while excluding us and depriving us of positive feelings they give other relatives in our presence. Like a slap in the face. Its manipulative and gross.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 03:07 AM
2

You haven't even been around for decades lmao
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 03:05 AM
3

They're not waiting to have sex. They're waiting to have sex with chumpsimpcuckolds they want to use, and giving it up immediately to tall handsome men. Simple as.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 03:04 AM
2

What an odd, hysterical, and mentally damaged way for you to begin your post. I'm not reading all this neurotic drivel, babe. You have to put out first for the person you're trying to be hysterical too for your words to carry weight.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 03:01 AM
1

Nobody wants that stinky stank. Get lost goo girl.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 02:56 AM
2

Up to age 21 is when it matters from women. They show their genuine sexual attraction and thus genuine capacity for romantic love, by choosing men up to their early 20s to give casual sex to. That's just how it is. The men they choose after that are being coldly, cunningly selected for interest and not attraction.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 02:52 AM
5

You crushed her low quality "point".
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 02:51 AM
3

Yep, a woman who wouldn't put out fast and hard in a casual way for a guy, is not attracted to him. Without that attraction, any "relationship" they form will be unhealthy.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 02:50 AM
5

These are the best sorts of comments from women/simps because they reveal the fundamental difference in psychology between men and women. Yes, men want the fun carefree non-work part of life, not the hard annoying work part. No, being a simp slave to women is not seen as a reward for men, even if women/simps see it as a reward for men.
/r/AllPillDebate28/10/23 02:50 AM
14

This doesn't contradict the blackpill at all. They are literally paying for sex with drugs. Its just a form of prostitution.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:13 PM
2

"NO White conservatives" "NO Whites" "F White people" "I hate conservatives" Never seen anything like this in practice, honestly, though you will see them larp as anti-conservative. Very few single moms advertise their children on there and when they do its almost always children of same race from some deadbeat dads of the same race that abandoned them. Women don't care about values generally, especially the ones that are so vocal about it. And neither do the conservative guys they're so vocal a…
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 01:04 PM
3

I'm gonna be honest with you, not reading that. It's important to approach issues in life with a cause-effect viewpoint regarding specific goals. For example, if your goal is to find genuine romantic love with a peer woman from your own cohort, and you're over your early 20s (at the very latest), you need a time machine to access all the non-negotiable sociosexual developmental milestones required that lead up to it. You also need access to gene therapy for your height and facial handsomeness. T…
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 12:37 PM
2

Aren't you that one guy that did that pants pissing stuff with his dad?
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 12:31 PM
3

Correct, you can negotiate for interest, not for attraction. Interest based relationships are cold and feature overwhelmingly in dead bedroom situations.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 11:04 AM
9

You seem to have misunderstood him, I'm sure entirely in good faith of course. So, in good faith, I will explain what it is that he communicated: approaching women is harassment if you are an unattractive man and non-blackpillers all encourage approaching women socially and sexually as a means for unattractive men to meet women for relationships and sex. I hope this has been helpful and that you are successful in your journey to improve your English ability as a second-language learner.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 10:58 AM
8

Stopped happening as I aged into my late 20s and now early 30s, but I know what that's like. Being openly mocked by people you've never spoken to before for things like your height is pretty obnoxious.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 10:52 AM
1

If a woman needs you to have le heckin' ambitionerinos to want to have a cold, sexless relationship with you, she isn't into you. Don't be a simp chump cuckold. Girls will suck the rotten cheese off a tall handsome homeless drug addict bum's dick behind a dumpster. Being a tall handsome bum is hot to women. Any girl/woman who asks about your job/career/education/ambitions is being coldly cunning and expressing calculated interest, not the raw sexual attraction necessary for a healthy relationshi…
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 09:24 AM
2

Looks and height are one and the same for men trying to attract women.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 06:48 AM
36

It has always been projection. Almost all criticism levelled against men by women is projection, not just that which they level against lonely men.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 04:31 AM
2

nobody is ever saying that everybody will have a chance with another person way beyond their looksmatch just because of their personalities. That's not what the example you quoted illustrates. Weird jargon like "looksmatch" and constructing ghost arguments to win against in place of real ones, is not how you get yourself out of the "lying deceitful rat" brand. Most short/ugly men are single when genuine romantic love exists and starting a relationship has any genuine value (up to age 21), after …
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 04:22 AM
7

Once the casual seal is broken, the casual seal is broken. It doesn't matter how many have been casually at the hole, if that number is more than zero. Once you've been goo'd, you can't ungoo yourself babe. You're a goo girl forever. Saying "I've had enough goo, I want a gooless man now" is just predatory behavior. Don't spread the gallons of goo you've taken on desperate, unsuspecting simps.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 04:10 AM
6

You've just been caught out, goo girl.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 04:08 AM
2

I can smell your stink. It's all the residual goo from those wild nights.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 04:06 AM
3

It's the least they can do for conning a man they don't romantically love (which is strictly expressed by choosing him when they're young for casual sex) into a "relationship" so they can check off some facebook photo life goals.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 04:02 AM
3

Has anybody told the women that having casual sex makes your gender look worserinos? LMAO
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 04:01 AM
3

burned by it That burning sensation is from all the goo that's been there, babe. You've been a goo girl.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:56 AM
4

You're a virgin? No? Then you're a goo girl. It is what you chose it to be. You chose to be a goo girl.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:54 AM
17

This is true. Casual sex is occurring at the highest rate ever in history, but its with the smallest group of men ever, and all down to fixed genetic factors (height and handsomeness). Women are exploring all the most extreme fetishes with this small group of men by high school, and are all experimented-out by the time their future simpslaves find them for le heckin relationshiperinos.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:51 AM
7

When you climb into a pool and your legs get wet, does it trigger the memory?
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:48 AM
5

Its not a girlfriend if she didn't put out casually first, it's a cuckold simp pairing. Girlfriends have casual sex with you first to show sexual attraction, and if they're pleasant they may get promoted to fwb/fuckbuddy and then a couple years later to gf.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:48 AM
2

Of course, conmen also don't complain when their mark falls for their ruse. 🤷 Why would a prostitute complain when she has a rube with no self-respect as a simpslave cuck to abuse?
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:45 AM
8

I spoke for you. I know you're scared to speak confidently for yourself because of that pants pissing thing you did with your dad.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:43 AM
10

A hooked up woman y'all is permanently hooked up even if "le heckerino hookerino culture" ends. Its the tradcuck woman thing y'all, pretending to be flowery y'all virgins when they're covered in a permanent thin film of y'all tall handsome abusechad sperm and grime. Women who ever y'all indulged in hookup culture are trying to deceive and manipulate men y'all into cold, unloving relationships now. Why would y'all anyone be "y'all be happerino" about that, y'all?
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:42 AM
6

Women chose hookup culture. Cats out of the bag. You can't revirginize a herpes gonorrhea snatch. Men know how women show genuine sexual attraction (a pre-requisite for genuine romantic love and thus for any worthwhile or healthy relationship) and that is through casual sex as fast as possible. Any man who gets with a woman who didn't put out casually first by definition has no self-respect. Congrats on the simp chump cuckold unions.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:38 AM
3

Unfortunately, this only works for women who have never had sex before and to catch guys with no self-respect. You can't revirginize a woman and you can't have self-respect if you accept less than what any other guy got from a woman. If she put out casually before, and she doesn't put out casually for a man, he has to have no self-respect to choose her.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:37 AM
11

Serious relationships by definition start from casual sex, moron. That's how women show sexual attraction and sexual attraction is a mandatory pre-requisite for genuine romantic love.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:34 AM
5

Yours is just weird effeminate language. Be direct and stop trying to sound intelligent while relaying an idea that is hysterical and insane. You cannot negotiate sexual attraction, a pre-requisite for genuine romantic love that a woman expresses through casual sex with a man that may or may not evolve into a relationship.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:27 AM
2

Of course, being sexually attractive as a man minimally requires being tall. It is a genetic thing.
/r/AllPillDebate27/10/23 03:25 AM
5

As a single factor, height far outweighs any other in terms of male attractiveness to women. This is well established in the literature. It has more of an impact than all other factors combined.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 07:38 PM
7

Part of the reason you're considered such a hysterical dunce is because you engage in these bizarre and transparent rhetorical tactics where you invent a non-existent argument to defeat. Everyone can see how incredibly dishonest and verminous you are. If you aren't putting out for them, nobody is going to accommodate that kind of disordered and histrionic communication style.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 07:35 PM
1

There is no such thing as "self-improvement". There is no objective measure of a worse self, a better self, or set of criteria for which activities constitute those that can improve the "self". It's complete nonsense, shifting constantly for amoral convenience depending on who is making what argument.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 07:27 PM
4

In all fairness the tall guys who slayed in middle schools were athletes as well Not really. Height has a measured and recorded effect on a man's attractiveness several orders of magnitude stronger than physical fitness. Some are athletes, most are not. The core point is that it doesn't matter what the voluntary/effort-based variables are, when you have the genetic non-voluntary fixed variables.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 01:10 PM
6

Being bitter is fine. Don't police his justified human reaction to total sociosexual exclusion and shunning in youth on account of factors beyond his control. Go police the pedoChads that receive endless love from women because their faces are pretty and their legs are acceptably long.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 09:29 AM
18

Yeah, it's all nonsense. These are pastime activities, not "self-improvement." Taller boys in school are losing it in 8th grade to their peer girls. None of this self-improvement stuff matters, its just a way of gaslighting and redirecting. Things just happen to you in the plot of life that are good if you're handsome/tall, and things just happen to you that are bad if you're ugly. This is the ground reality. Watch what is actually happening, despite what women and simps say, and you'll see: no …
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 09:14 AM
1

Nope, not how reality works. Your looksmatch is decided by the woman who would get with you on account of how attractive she finds you relative to herself. Actions > words, always. Women will not be sexually aroused by men they find ugly, and thus those men ugly to all women (30% of men) have no looksmatches.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 09:10 AM
2

Women be like: let me shun and socially ignore and isolate 30% of men for all the meaningful sexual years of their lives (up to age 21) because maybe if im a pump and dump toy for tall handsome men, one of them will lower himself to stay with me Women also be like: "Incels be like: I just want my looksmatch. I'm an average dude who likes average women. Incel also be like: let me keep reminding you about how much I enjoy these HOT women. Don't forget the HOT stripper. I'm definitely not obsessed …
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 08:04 AM
5

There is. He's only got it half right. A significant number of the men doing it are actually genuinely falling in love with the granny. That's the other, darker half of the granny pill. Three hundred year old women have more options for genuine romantic love than a short unattractive young man.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 07:54 AM
1

which is weird because you'd think there would be higher standards on the end of women speaking from a moral perspective There has never been any reason to believe this. Women have a sociosexual morality. Their moral values are post-hoc determined after their feelings, choices, and actions. In their minds, if they want to be with a man sexually, that man must be good. Even if he is a degenerate worthless pedo. If they don't want to be with a man sexually, then he is evil. And they will post-hoc …
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 07:50 AM
9

I'm gonna be honest, I'm not reading all that neurotic babble. If you need more than a couple sentences to explain your position, its wrong.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 07:38 AM
6

No, not at all. But I do find it liberating to know these things. When a person denies the peer reviewed replicated settled science (known here as the "blackpill") its trivial to disregard anything they say, because you know instantaneously that they aren't an honest person and are instead ideologically driven. You can engage them in any manner you please, because your aim isn't to change their mind, its just to have fun. You know from the start they know the blackpill is true but their ideology…
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:45 AM
1

this sub is mostly comprised of racial minorities. all systems of deprivation, capitalism, sexual liberalism, etc. disproportionately affect minority demographics in a fixed location.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:39 AM
0

I find this neonazi position interesting. Why are non-whites supposed to view all non-white women of differing races as belonging in one giant pool while you elevate white women outside of it? Why should the races remain segregated, as you wish? These generic dehumanized "ethnic women" you imagine, what non-human animal are you asserting they are on the level of? Very interesting nazi position I see your ilk frequently spouting.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:34 AM
1

Trying to flip the script and falsely refer to the racist abuse they suffer as self-hate is disgusting and grotesque. You are a racist. Period.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:32 AM
1

It's a good thing you're not the center of the world. If we disregarded everything you hadn't heard about we'd have to disregard everything meaningful and important. Blacks and whites are the two most racist groups, particularly towards South Asians and East Asians. In the American race-caste system it goes whites, blacks, and then everyone else.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:31 AM
1

In terms of sexually arousing women, being involved in a criminal organization has a much more profoundly positive effect than being an intelligent, educated, gainfully employed member of a non-protected race in the America race-caste system.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:30 AM
3

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:28 AM
15

If you struggle to read, have your dad read it to you after you two are done with that mutual pants pissing thing.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:27 AM
1

Why do you only tell short and ugly men this? Why do you not go up to tall handsome men IRL, at the club or at church, everywhere, and chastise them to their face if they aren't virgins? Why do you shake and tremble like a pants pissing coward when its time to be true to your supposed (but actually false) beliefs about how people who elevate the importance of sex so as to seek its inclusion in their lives should be chastised? Why do you only punch at the people you know its socially acceptable t…
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:23 AM
1

Looks like an allusion to the flow of your dad's piss at night.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:22 AM
1

nah this is neurotic cuck nonsense
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:20 AM
2

And while he's at it he could also lick the bull's load from his wife.
/r/AllPillDebate26/10/23 12:20 AM
-6

but still expect the world to be handed to you. I agree, and that's how every single genetically physically attractive man behaves, as well as all women. Tall men with down syndrome are more sexually successful on average than short men without it.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 02:24 PM
22

The bottom 30% of men have no looksmatch in women, due to how women rate men. They're sub-0 in looks, lower than any woman. Who are they supposed to be attracted to?
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 02:23 PM
9

Therapy doesn't work for male body image issues. It exacerbates them through gaslighting. He needs to get a license and get a job, in whichever order is necessary. A little bit of financial "power" will give him some peace of mind even if it won't enable a genuine romantic life. That's the meaningful advice for a man. He should seek therapy/medication for his anxiety around driving and working, not for his sadness over not being loveable to women. My message to him is to stop focusing on it so m…
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 02:11 PM
2

Margot Robbie is average nah, she's pretty af. It's true though that a lot of social movements are inspired by envy, aspects of feminism included. Sometimes that envy is justified, sometimes it is not. Women also benefit significantly from psychological phenomena that are innate to all people that bias in favor of women.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 02:04 PM
1

Recently divorced single mother approaching me, despite not having spoken to me in over a decade, and complaining about her financial situation while flirting with me.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 12:07 PM
1

Anyone raised in America is ethnically American. You are not telling people to sort by ethnicity, you are telling them to sort by race (outward appearance), even if they are wildly different/clashing cultures/ethnicities, as an Asian American and an Asian immigrant will be. "Better shot" is not how meeting and falling in love works. That is dependent on the people you are surrounded by coincidentally. Coldly and connivingly seeking out people of a specific race is just a watered down version of …
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 11:46 AM
2

Yes, women just feel it for far fewer men. Tall and handsome is what it takes to to trigger it in women.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 11:30 AM
6

I get that personality matters to some degree in long term relationships it doesn't. a woman will be kind and true to a man she sexually desires, and wont to a man she doesn't.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 11:27 AM
2

lol
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 11:26 AM
7

Do you still feel it at night, when you're trembling in the dark, remembering? Do you still feel all the piss?
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 10:06 AM
10

I know about your dad and that pants pissing thing you did with him.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 09:28 AM
1

No, they don't reason through it. Its an immediate impulse, and has nothing to do with survivability benefits. Its Fisherian.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 09:19 AM
1

I'd say it's both looks and charisma. You'd be incorrect. Tall handsome men who drool and can't string sentences together still do extremely well sociosexually.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:34 AM
1

your own women His own women are whichever group he grew up with. Trying to force racial segregation outs you as a neo-nazi/klansman type. Gross.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:26 AM
-1

This is an interesting KKK/neo-nazi position that I hadn't considered.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:25 AM
4

I caught you out for posting this nonsense already. They're all arranged married, a form of culturally compulsory/forced marriage with serious threats of shunning or worse behind it. There is no love, sexual arousal, etc. present in those pairings. Try to be an honest person. When you get called out for false nonsense, don't keep repeating it like a dunce.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:23 AM
3

Nah, people are not that discerning. They're not applying hyperscientific giganalytical sociological methods to determine if the skull shape of the Indian man they've rejected is a FOB or an American, or microanalyzing his behaviors, attitudes or experiences. They're just seeing "bad race" and going "no thanks". The negative stereotypes are post-hoc justifications for automatic preference.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:21 AM
2

You are short/ugly and act like you're tall/handsome. That is deeply offensive to women and they will consider you abusive for it.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:18 AM
2

Kind hearted women are kind to everyone No they're not lmao the act of sexual selection encompasses the judgment of a man being worse than the dirt under her shoe (not worthy of making more people like him into perpetuity). A woman cannot be kind if she has rejected a man. That's not a kind act. It doesn't matter if that's an unfair reality, it is the reality. Existing has a minimum amount of unnkindness built in. No one is kind to everyone, period. Kind women are very selectively kind, and wome…
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:17 AM
1

Is that what your dad taught you about?
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:05 AM
16

Love languages are not a thing, they're a new-age pop psych womens magazine jargon invention for rube cultist morons who believe in things like astrology.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 08:03 AM
1

You don't say a word to them, wimp. You tremble and piss your pants. Who is talking about your pants pissing friends? Why did you try to dodge the actual terms of the confrontation like a scared wimp? Your pants soaked?
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 07:59 AM
4

Why do you only tell short and ugly men this? Why do you not go up to tall handsome men IRL, at the club or at church, everywhere, and chastise them to their face if they aren't virgins? Why do you shake and tremble like a pants pissing coward when its time to be true to your supposed (but actually false) beliefs about how people who elevate the importance of sex so as to seek its inclusion in their lives should be chastised? Why do you only punch at the people you know its socially acceptable t…
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 07:58 AM
2

The same way you were not depressed before that. Depression comes from learned helplessness. That is, doing behaviors and failing and not knowing why you failed. The function of things like therapy, the blackpill, etc. is to provide knowledge that enables you to recontextualize that failure psychologically so that you're not lost in self-hatred (and extreme, punishing "self-improvement" is self-hatred/self-harm).
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 07:57 AM
4

Relationships and sex are a basic human need I take it you've accepted the blackpill? This is considered an extremely evil position by non-blackpill people. You'd be considered an entitled creep for this claim (except when they desire to contradict the claim that they consider people creeps for making that claim. They have no stable position, and no morals.)
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 07:55 AM
6

Nah babygirl, he was just pointing out that you're slow and hysterical. Don't pee your pants over it. Don't be scared.
/r/AllPillDebate25/10/23 07:53 AM
6

Anything except a clear and enthusiastic "yes" from the first moment is an absolute and permanent "no".
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 10:43 PM
5

You forget fds: pretend that not being able to have your ideal relationship is equivalent to being excluded from social developmental milestones because of your face and height all other women online: pretend women have no agency when it benefits them to be made to seem helpless
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 10:40 PM
5

Nobody outside of your freak tumblr incel heckerino community knows your internet jargon like "incel". I don't think criminal organizations in Mexico are choosing their victims because they can sense the heckerino incellerinos on them. Also lose the weird passive affect, its pussy stuff. Grow a pair and be a man.
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 10:35 PM
4

Neither do tall handsome unkempt homeless stinking drug addict garbage juice covered men. Women will jump in their dumpsters at the snap of their fingers.
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 10:32 PM
3

whinge What a peculiar pidgin. Speak normal, like an American.
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 10:28 PM
1

No, sleeping with a drunk woman is assault. Your friends are sex predators. Also what about unattractive looking celebrities? They can find a girl to sleep with them without providing any resources. Except for the status of sleeping with a celebrity. Are these women horny for them or just letting them hit? What about Kings? Or God? God can have sex with trillions by snapping his fingers.
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 10:56 AM
10

Why do you only tell short and ugly men this? Why do you not go up to tall handsome men IRL, at the club or at church, everywhere, and chastise them to their face if they aren't virgins? Why do you shake and tremble like a pants pissing coward when its time to be true to your supposed (but actually false) beliefs about how people who elevate the importance of sex so as to seek its inclusion in their lives should be chastised? Why do you only punch at the people you know its socially acceptable t…
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 10:49 AM
14

They are socially isolated because they are short or ugly. Men won't associate with men that women won't associate with, for fear of being placed in the same sex-caste.
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 09:42 AM
2

Why are their mothers raising them this way? And why is the fact that all women have always been weird, socially awkward, and obese not detrimental to their odds of being genuinely romantically loved by men, as evidenced by the reproductive data?
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 08:16 AM
7

Nope. Not what settling means. Most women settle, most men are foolishly genuinely in love with their partners despite a lack of reciprocity.
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 08:15 AM
6

Healthy relationships are those that are built from the spark of intense attraction that underlies casual sex. If she isn't interested in putting out for him on day one, he is not romantically lovable to her at any point and their relationship will not be healthy. If you mean, is there anyway to identify which men women feel that intense attraction for and arrange for women to be in group harem marriages with those men only, then yes. Tall and handsome are measurable qualities and are the essent…
/r/AllPillDebate24/10/23 08:11 AM
6

Nah, "getting laid" means getting a girl horny for casual sex based on how you look (height and face) and then having it. Paying prostitutes is not "getting laid". Its paying for sex.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 08:15 PM
2

No one is surprised that your peabrain is addled by drugs.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 08:14 PM
2

So offer up your mouth babe. Put your mouth where your money is and give the guys a bit of joy. Swallow it all down when they're done to prove you want them to stop being le heckerino incelerinos.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 08:11 PM
6

To cry us a river.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 08:10 PM
6

Triggered the hell out of him lmao
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 08:10 PM
3

I think its because he could smell the stink of predator on you.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 08:09 PM
1

They can't help it, they have no peer reviewed replicated evidence and arguments.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:55 PM
8

They ban dissent there, baby girl. If soft gentle handling is your preference then head on over.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:54 PM
6

A man trusting a woman does not make a woman trustworthy. Don't be a simp. Get some self-respect.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:52 PM
3

Nah, you get downvoted because you're disingenous. Don't be a whiny victim baby. Uglyface McShortstuff leaving the house to feed the birds at the local park every evening isn't going to make him any vibrant, age-appropriate friends.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:47 PM
1

Depends on how physically attractive you are relative to the men you approach.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:46 PM
13

Nah, men gifted rights graciously to women. Voting, human rights, the right to be judges, welfare programs etc. All were gifted by male dominated political structures and societies to helpless women. No, marching with a few placards and doing le heckin sexerino strikerinos did not overwhelm powerful state instutitions. You'll have to do better than your hysterics, sweetheart. Unless you're putting out for the guys you ramble at, there's no reason to value what you have to say.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:40 PM
8

Competition in any domain naturally leads to monopolies because of the genetic scarcity of domain specific talent. This is as true of market competitiveness as it is of height. Ultimately, in an indefinite unrestrained capitalist system, all wealth concentrates to a single individual. This talent is more likely to be how handsome a man is, and thus gets promoted to CEO, more than any behavioral or intellectual capacity.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:37 PM
0

Its a good thing your eyes have no value and so your personal accounts are likewise valueless. You have to earn that value, and you haven't offered it up to any of the guys here to do that.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:35 PM
4

dude actually has to be a decent person Why are there so many single mothers whining about their amazing morally righteous (definition of decent) ex-partners? The unavoidable implication of your assessment is that its morally righteous to abandon your pregnant partner. What a strange ideological position.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:32 PM
5

Maybe. Ultimately, they are whatever the women want them to be.
/r/AllPillDebate23/10/23 07:30 PM
2

I don't see a relationship purely as a job and I never stated such. I stated that it IS a job for men, regardless of how YOU see it. Why invent terms to argue against instead of arguing against the stated terms? I don't buy the idea that there are men who get this kind of treatment on a regular basis. This is known as coping, and is an anti-evidence ideological position. Life, especially youth, is an endless orgy of sexual pleasure with women for tall handsome men. and it mostly depends on women…
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 08:46 PM
9

lmao no. cut the cope. it was naziesque eugenicsmaxxing from dutch women
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 08:44 PM
1

That's not a lack of insecurity, that's total insecurity. Hallmark submissive behavior. He was dominated by their presence and his insecurity compelled him to change his affect completely from tough guy to girlie.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 08:43 PM
8

Note that Dutch men were GENETICALLY shorter than American men with both having ideal nutrition around mid-century (1950s). The journey from 5' 9" to 6' 4" average height in the Netherlands has been from brutal eugenics women applied to short men including high rates of cuckoldry and other abuse, of the sort that would make Hitler blush.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 08:41 PM
12

No they don't.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 08:38 PM
7

get bitter about this dream being unrealistic and refuse to hold any job because you don't want to settle. Except your employer isn't likely to pay the market rate of a trillion dollars (hot casual sex and genuine romantic love equivalent) to one man and then offer you minimum wage (cold calculated interest based relationship without romantic love and crazy kinky sex). If he did you would have to be a self-hating loser not to walk away. Relationships are not a reward for a man, they are just wor…
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 06:42 PM
10

This is hilarious cope for ugly/short men. He is just describing the literal and non-negotiable definition of romantic love. Not realistic LMAO true, if you're short or ugly.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 06:40 PM
7

I love that this comment tells on women. It admits that virginity is considered an ultimate form of conveying value (being special to the point you have to be amazingly exceptional) to the person and situation they give it to. They don't value their marriage or husband as much as whichever rando they lost their virginity to, by this simps own admission, if they don't give their virginity to their husband.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 06:36 PM
3

I'd say taking gallons of loads in your eyes in your nose in your mouth in your ass in your pussy in your hands on your feet on your breasts in your hair in your butt then your mouth etc. is way creepier. All that herpetic gonorrheaic ooze just covering and filling you. Doesn't get any creepier than that.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 06:34 PM
0

Most things have not been adapted to the modern world, they were simply abandoned.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 06:32 PM
0

I find it interesting that all the ultraconservative (traditional) things which are gratifying to women are retained, yet those which they do not find gratifying are "toxic". Very interesting ideology.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 06:32 PM
2

Cutting does a tremendous amount of harm and the death and serious injury rate from it is higher than any athletic activity, from very dangerous sports like soccer to less dangerous ones like weightlifting.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 03:11 AM
4

Every single woman, hot or not, is into "Chads" (tall handsome men) and every Chad could be an abuser if he wanted and all women would tolerate it for a chance at his dick. Those are just the facts. The more a person denies this, the more they are the kind of woman (even if they're a man) that would take abusechad dick.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 03:04 AM
1

Nope. Sneed. Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 03:01 AM
12

I can smell the stink of predator on you.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 02:57 AM
19

They don't really. They still don't love or feel attracted to shorter/uglier men. They just tolerate association with them because they're afraid to be alone as they grow old. Their standards are cognitively the same as always.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 02:56 AM
4

This woman is gonna be very depressed when she learns that mom and dad won't pay for college unless she arrange marries Ranvir Korma, a 40 year old man with a permanently unwashed cheese dick.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 02:48 AM
1

Cum
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 01:02 AM
7

He seems to be illustrating a point. You don't care either, caring is demonstrated by direct action, not by words.
/r/AllPillDebate22/10/23 12:52 AM
2

When Chad knows about that, the women listen and take notes on his erect cock. When you know about that, women break the tips of their pencils and put in ear plugs.
/r/AllPillDebate21/10/23 02:42 AM
3

looks are related to attractiveness Idiots forgot that looks ARE attractiveness, not related. It's definitional. Attention not based on looks is called interest. Interest is not attraction. It is a colder, more calculated thing.
/r/AllPillDebate21/10/23 02:01 AM
7

No, this is simp nonsense. And a lot of it. You typed all that up when you could have just typed: Guys you gotta simpcuckoldjestermaxx like me to get a crumb of 30+ post-expiry pussy. You have no self-respect. Getting women who are genuinely attracted to you is not about things you can accomplish through effort, it's about your height and your face. Interest in non-genetic qualities and things is not to be confused with attraction. Lay off the neurosis. It's as simple as can be.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 09:57 PM
7

Yes, its crabs in a bucket infighting at the bottom. People at the top are way more serene and unbothered, because they have everything handed to them they could ever want. Part of the problem people at the bottom (mostly simps) take with the blackpill is that it says that jostling for position is stupid and pointless because the evidence doesn't support being a simp cuckold clown slave and servant to women. You're not going to get genuine romantic love that way. And they've already spent years …
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 09:50 PM
1

You have to exchange your height/handsomeness for empathy with women. If you're not exceptionally attractive, you can't let your weaknesses show like that.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 09:43 PM
3

from age 18 Very conservative assessment.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 09:42 PM
4

When Chad writes fanfic, the women in it climb onto his erect cock right there on the page. When you write fanfic, the women cover their eyes in horror at the terrible quality of your prose.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 09:32 PM
1

Cum.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 08:27 PM
1

The hullabaloo women raise about men who only want casual sex is a smokescreen. Women love no strings attached raw rough unloving cold casual sex. But they hate that ugly men exist and have sexualities. They want to desex and eunuchize ugly/short men as much as possible and this sort of social shaming is effective. The guys they sleep with casually just laugh when they hear this stuff expressed, because they just had their balls gargled and their unwashed tips licked clean the night before, and …
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 08:25 PM
1

why not just find another Indian girl The JBW rule applies no less to Indian girls. If you're speaking of Indian girls in literal India, why would an American man who is racially Indian do that? That's not just sex tourism, but also potentially human trafficking. Not just that, but casual sex is not easy to come by in India and it's nonsense to seriously date or marry someone culturally opposite you because you were brought up in different places. You don't share culture by race, its not magical…
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 08:19 PM
1

If a woman loves you, she will always marvel about your height and how hot you are. This is a universal thing. If she isn't openly attracted to your height and doesn't openly find you handsome, she isn't into you.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 08:13 PM
5

When Chad sees a therapist, she climbs onto his erect cock right there in the office. When you see a therapist, she screams and vomits from the stench.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 08:02 PM
1

feed
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 08:00 PM
1

sneed
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 07:59 PM
2

This is what I've observed with religious women as well. Women are women, no less than men are men. The veneer we wear is very fragile and cannot truly change our programming. Thanks for sharing. Its refreshing to compare honest notes.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 07:55 PM
3

I didn't have a job or money at that point. I also have absolutely no game. Yeah, women don't care about any of that shit if they find you genuinely sexually attractive, which is a must for any meaningful romantic relationship/healthy family dynamic. Let me just hazard a guess here, but you weren't a muscle bound gym rat either? Once you see how they treat the small segment of men they actually find attractive (tall and handsome), how they make exceptions for them and break all their own boundar…
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 11:10 AM
47

You'll never encounter more brutal and sincere misogynistic language than you will in the company of good looking stereotypically masculine men talking about women absent their presence. The kind of guys that women most adore.
/r/AllPillDebate20/10/23 05:44 AM
9

Yes, sociosexual dynamics don't change by political background or "values" when it comes to women. They're based on the same things: male height and facial handsomeness. People who think the conservative Christian girls in their college class are going to think differently are living in a fantasy. There are premarital ORGIES of pleasure casually arranged between churchgoing girls and the tallest most handsome guys in the pews. They meet up and fuck, fuck, fuck after mass. I know exactly what you…
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 06:34 PM
8

Grannypill is any woman 30+. Most men have no self respect, because they have fewer options than grannies.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 06:30 PM
8

These mystical "incels" don't, never have, and never will. You have constructed a man of straw to defeat. The assertion is that women select men INDEPENDENT of moral quality. Which is correct. This means that a bad handsome man will be selected over a bad or good ugly man, and a good handsome man will be selected over a bad or good ugly man. In other words, an ugly man has no incentive to be good, and social shaming ("you should be heckerino gooderino for its own sakerino!11!") doesn't work on a…
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 09:59 AM
11

Yep, its pretty telling that communities moderated by "blackpill" people don't ban dissenters but the others do. Tells you who values information and truth over protecting sacrosanct ideas.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 09:54 AM
9

Its fine. For a few years now the direct communal discussion of the settled science on attraction (what is called "the blackpill") has sort of faded away, but I've noticed it all over mainstream social media and many people have reported that younger people are using terms associated with these now derelict communities IRL. Basically, the blackpill is just mainstream now. Its why people like Tate got a foothold. He's not "blackpill" in that he grifts/sells false ways out of the current dating cl…
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 09:47 AM
16

Ah, by extremism you mean the peer reviewed replicated research. Wild that science is now considered extremism because it makes privileged/entitled classes feel the bad fee fees.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 09:43 AM
17

Nah, people like you and other predators aren't banned despite your predatory predilections.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 09:41 AM
1

I smell the stink of predator on you.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 05:36 AM
3

Because he pretended to have even more money and she felt she was owed a better lifestyle for wasting her life on a beta loser without a lot of money. She could have been a more handsome man's toy, and felt her life as a groin accessory for a good looking guy was stolen from her.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 05:36 AM
3

sure thing babe
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 05:35 AM
8

Simmer down with the neonazi far right homophobia shit, bud.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 05:33 AM
1

Generally speaking yes, liberal minded people are still incredibly and openly racist when and where it suits them. Black women won't be treated as kindly as white women. They will, however, still be treated better than all but the most attractive men.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 12:40 AM
9

No, she cheated on her "soulmate" with a rich, rich, otherwise rich-being man. It turns out he was a delivery driver. She got conned because she was a gold digger. This is exactly the blackpill. That women only love tall handsome men and otherwise will "betabuxx" rich men and exchange sex for material security. From one beta to another.
/r/AllPillDebate19/10/23 12:23 AM
2

You will have to communicate in a manner different than how you would with your sex partners, because I have no incentive to accommodate your hysteria unless you're giving it up to me.
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 08:50 PM
9

Nah, sex deprived men are the hardest workers. They're the worker bee whipping boys of any community. Useful for their productivity and tax money and what little they need to be given in return.
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 08:45 PM
11

Visiting an escort doesn't remove your virginity. In the same way that getting a handjob doesn't. A straight man is a virgin until he has casual sex with a woman who is horny for him. PhD cohorts are full of 30+ year old virgin men.
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 08:43 PM
7

Pre or post op?
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 07:00 AM
1

the best thing her support system Non-selected men aren't utilities to be used on call while she rides her abuser and gifts him endless pleasure. That's bizarre. Men are rarely involved in the process of getting a woman out of that type of situation Almost the entire system that prohibits and punishes domestic violence is male dominated. Men are also never involved in getting a woman into that type of situation. She has to select that sort of man intentionally and of her own volition, in terms o…
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 06:42 AM
32

There are a number of reasons for dislike of the blackpill. This is one of them. Another is that its highly analytical and removes the assumed mystique of social interaction, which under analysis is shown not to exist at all but to follow almost totally predictable patterns and outcomes. This is an autistic way of seeing the world, and despite being correct in its conclusions, is high unattractive to women. Even autistic women find the way autistic people think repulsive, hence their lack of int…
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 06:34 AM
1

Nothing. TRT is testosterone, its the same thing. It's just that the idea of TRT is to bring a person with unhealthily low levels of testosterone up into the middle to higher part of the normal range. If you're not testosterone deficient to start with, calling it TRT doesn't make it TRT. It's just pinning test/using roids.
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 05:12 AM
1

Yeah at that height muscles will actually do you a lot of good.
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 05:10 AM
3

Correct. Tall handsome men are treated by women as if they have no agency and their negative character traits are projected by simping women onto other men to avoid having to blame the men that get you all wet and wiggly, because then you would have the bad fee fees.
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 03:30 AM
5

I agree, its really horrific that their mothers selfishly and intentionally chose to reproduce with the minority of men with such obviously awful personalities that they'd abandon their children and families, simply to get dick from tall handsome guys. Unbelievably evil on the part of women to sacrifice the future of their children to feel hot for a few minutes, I'm glad you pointed this out.
/r/AllPillDebate18/10/23 12:28 AM
5

If that's what they were looking for, just some casual fun, I would have obliged. I couldn't do the dishonest lead-them-on routine with the women I'd known since I was young. It didn't feel right to prey on their expectations of "romance" and use them only for pleasure. I know attractive men have no trouble doing this because they don't see women as people, and women enjoy being used sexually by attractive men even if its emotionally painful, but it's a mental block for me. I think morality is a…
/r/AllPillDebate17/10/23 10:55 PM
1

simpery🤡 cuckoldry 🤡 LMAO 🤡
/r/AllPillDebate17/10/23 07:37 PM
1

You are SELF-admittedly several standard deviations below the mean in terms of sexual activity for a woman. The mean number of sex partners for women is 6, self-reported (so considerably higher in actuality). You're what statisticians call an outlier. Your data point would be excluded from analysis of CENTRAL behaviors in women by necessity, the same way a prostitute or a schizophrenic nymphomaniac would be excluded.
/r/AllPillDebate17/10/23 06:05 PM
1

You've never had casual sex? If you have, you're trying to repackage an unwrapped gift. Stop selling a fake image of yourself and be honest with potential partners.
/r/AllPillDebate17/10/23 06:01 PM
1

Olympic simp
/r/AllPillDebate17/10/23 05:58 PM
23

It doesn't get better, but I found my opportunities for simpdom and pseudocuckery increased. Many of you will have women from your pasts who either rejected you or were just acquaintances or friends come to you with obvious intentions as you cross the 30 years mark. Some of them will have been freshly divorced and have several kids from a guy that apparently was not le heckin good personality after all, it only took them twelve years of getting dicked down by their tall exes to figure out their …
/r/AllPillDebate17/10/23 05:46 PM
3

Women don't play games with men they find genuinely sexually attractive. They are desperate to get in bed with those men. Its what leads to "sex in the employee bathroom ten minutes after meeting for the first time" kind of situations. If she didn't have a reaction like that to you, you're not romantically loveable to her. Period. The gradual interest that might develop in her about you is not to ever be conflated with romantic love.
/r/AllPillDebate17/10/23 07:39 AM
2

Here? Hard to say. Sex deprived men in general? Not a chance, they're 30%+ of the male population. In addition to autism, OCD, etc. any kind of early life trauma that changes your perception or behavior and makes you less chipper and constantly cheerful will make you disgusting to women unless you're super good looking. They especially hate guys with sexual trauma. Read any self-reports of guys opening up about being raped or sexually abused to their wives and how it destroyed their marriage.
/r/AllPillDebate17/10/23 01:28 AM
2

My ex is an amazing catch She's eye candy but you have described a literal nightmare in all other respects, not an amazing catch.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 08:43 PM
9

Yeah, we're decades past the time nutrition and environment had any impact on male height in wealthy countries. Since the 1970s, that half a foot height increase in average height has been from eugenics performed on height by women. Would make Hitler blush.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 08:40 PM
2

Make a move as early as you can and ghost her if she doesn't put out. It's that simple. That's how you avoid that situation.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 08:39 PM
17

Women won't just approach you and tell you you're hot if you're genuinely physically attractive, they'll straight up start touching you/grabbing you in a lot of situations. If women were held to men's standards of propriety almost all of them would be considered massive creeps.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 04:46 AM
21

Even my psychology professor in college told us not to get between an abusive man and his partner in a quarrel. She will turn on you to protect him. They are there by choice, from the very beginning, and always know before getting into these situations that these men are abusive. Don't put yourself at risk "rescuing" someone who doesn't want your help and views you as lower than the dirt under their shoes.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 04:45 AM
3

Yes they were, they were drowning in your buttpussy.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 03:06 AM
6

Simmer down the far-right neonazi homophobia there, bud.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 03:05 AM
14

This is just a disconnect between what two different people mean when they say personality. You know this and are being fundamentally dishonest. When women and simps refer to personality while socially shaming short/ugly men, they mean a nebulous arrangement of non-specific or laughably clown-like assortment of hobbies (maybe if you just learned to knit, inkel) that are banal and have no relation to sexual attraction. It is merely a tactic, in line with fallacious just world ideology, to shame a…
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 03:02 AM
17

If you weren't such a frightened pussy you'd be able to admit to yourself the ground reality of the fact that the genetics of a man's height and the handsomeness of his face are the only significant factors in "becoming the man they actually want." LMAO what a submissive position. Just change your being in ways that won't help you succeed in any meaningful way, to become a simp cuckold and chump for women like a little wimpy slave.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 02:56 AM
7

That's not falling in love, that's growing interested in. It's a cold, calculated process. Falling in romantic love is a passionate, irrational, and involuntary process.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 01:05 AM
3

especially in the long term. No man with dignity would accept a long term without the short term of genuine romantic love evidenced as immediate sexual arousal preceding it. People may fall love with someone because of their personality, unique quirks etc. No, you are describing interest, a cold and calculated thing. People fall in romantic love based on how a person looks. a successful relationship. Relationships without genuine romantic love sourced from passionate mutual sexual attraction are…
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 01:04 AM
7

LOL. Yes it does. That they didn't find the chump simps they had to settle for attractive when the men they were instantaneously aroused by on account of fixed genetic features didn't want them, is not evidence that they didn't find men they were instantaneously attracted to instantaneously attractive. If she thinks you're hot, she knows it right away. If you're a future simp, she knows that right away too.
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 01:01 AM
10

No, falling in (romantic) love requires that initial sexual arousal that would give rise to casual sexual encounters. What you're describing is the gradual emergence of interest in the person. Interest is not attraction. Attraction is sexual arousal to physical traits. That is instantaneous, and is the basis for romantic love. Interest, as well as other kinds of love, are not romantic love. After a man sees how women immediately/instantaneously respond to physically attractive men, he has a base…
/r/AllPillDebate16/10/23 12:59 AM
11

as long as you don’t negatively impact them specifically and directly. People profoundly care already and always have about harmless sexual behavior that men engage in as a coping mechanism after (yes, after, its important not to put the cart before the horse) being resoundingly rejected on account of their height and facial handsomeness. Porn consumption is constantly attacked politically, legally, and socially, especially by women who see it as detrimental to them forming relationships in thei…
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 08:26 PM
8

The personality argument is so tired and so thoroughly discredited that it's pointless even discussing it with women and simps. They aren't interested in intellectual honesty. Male anti-social behavior has been well known for centuries to lead to greater increases in sexual success and popularity with women. Women favor anti-social personality traits, which are the literal definition of bad personalities. Pro-social behavior, on the other hand, has no positive effect on reproductive success. Mea…
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 07:23 PM
1

The blackpill is hard and fast, it does not make exceptions for the fantasy you want to construct. You can't engineer romantic love. If you want a relationship not based on romantic love, those are already available to you in the form of arranged marriages. You don't need a total restructuring of society to enforce loveless marriages en masse.
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 07:13 PM
7

Co-opting male language like "coping" doesn't really work and comes off as profoundly inauthentic and intellectually dishonest. She's right. You're conflating real, experience based bitterness with hate. It's like saying the hungry hate supermarkets because they're raging about the price increases on food.
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 05:28 PM
7

If you don't care about sex you don't care about romantic love, so you didn't need to restate it. The reason you "don't care about sex" is because you're worried that when you put out for some extremely tall and handsome virginity taking stud, he won't stick with you and give you the ego boost. There are plenty of guys in your lane that would, that's your choice. You decided to give yourself that problem.
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 05:27 PM
7

The only men that hate you are the ones you selectively and intentionally choose to let into your lives and reward with sex. Its a fact: women choose men who account for nearly all the abuse toward women, despite anti-social men who abuse women at all only comprising about 2% of the male population. That means that women have a profound preference for abusive men, which coincides with their profound preference for tall handsome men. That's a you problem. Tall handsome men don't have any incentiv…
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 05:21 PM
10

loving Women don't have a love switch they can turn on for you. How is the government going to accomplish this genetic engineering that would rewire the neurological development of your wife to allow her to romantically love a short/ugly man?
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 05:18 PM
1

There is no reason to persist in a deluded state with a woman who doesn't love you. And there is even less reason to do so with the state at your back. No thanks. This kind of redpill trad crap is not for me.
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 05:17 PM
3

Not to mention that casual sex IS the segway into genuine romantic love. A sexless start to a "relationship" is not a relationship based on romantic love.
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 05:14 PM
8

Same as any woman: tall with a handsome face. Each one of those traits is about 15% of the population. They are not completely independent, but the proportion of men who are both somewhat tall and at least relatively handsome is under 10% of the male population. It's something you can't become either since its based on genetic traits, so their supply is inelastic.
/r/AllPillDebate15/10/23 05:13 PM
1

You have a victim complex and a personality disorder.
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 10:04 PM
1

Cope with your pederasty 🤣
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 10:03 PM
3

What are you talking about? Expecting? That's not a thing. These are discussions of what is, not what we want. love for you in other ways Romantic love is shown through eager sex and sexual arousal. Straight men can get all other kinds of love in non-romantic/non-sexual relationships like friendships, family. Romantic love is what a woman brings to the table, or else she literally has nothing at all to add. She LITERALLY cannot express romantic love in other ways, because its definitionally a di…
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 10:02 PM
2

The pig woman is the gold standard, it was a 60 year old woman with a face photoshopped to resemble a domesticated farm pig. Hundreds of matches looking for loving relationships, sex, etc. in days. And that was 10 years ago when matches were even fewer.
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 10:01 PM
1

I'm not reading all that champ, sorry. Simping is truly a mental illness.
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 10:00 PM
8

I can't imagine simping this hard.
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 07:58 PM
1

Bluepillers call people simps and cucks? Never seen it.
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 06:54 PM
12

Dude, have you even tried to be a eunuch asexual while your peer women get gangbang blowbanged throatpied by groups of men on account of their height and facial handsomeness? Huh incel? Have you ever even tried to be a non-human sexless silent submissive eyes-on-the-ground at all times workerbee slave servant? Literally no one is looking for sex, love, romance, intimacy, relationships, families, and marriages except you. It's such a fringe thing no one does. I know it's hard to imagine but it's …
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 05:35 PM
2

All the people coping on the more mainstream post of this on reddit are hilarious. The common line they're using is: "when other women see what he's like he's going to be flooded with dates" It's funny because 1) If any women cared about personality/behavior this video wouldn't exist as another woman would have locked him down already. Clearly he struggles to get ANY dates, on account of his height, face, and race. 2) Why haven't women been letting him show them what he's like this whole time? S…
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 05:33 PM
1

In-group preferences don't matter. He could be born and raised in "the West" and under the purported western ethos of community by nationality he would by a member of the in-group, but still face the same exclusion. Unless you're saying in-groups/out-groups are by race alone in the west, which is a definite caste system.
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 09:44 AM
2

There isn't a tendency here to do anything. We have hundreds of years and billions of data points for things like the effect size of different traits on reproductive success. Ordinary personality traits play little to no role. Height accounts for the vast majority of male reproductive success. Mental health makes up most of the rest. Facial handsomeness is next. Financial success, which used to be huge for men, is now almost unobservable in effect.
/r/AllPillDebate14/10/23 09:37 AM
4

This is exactly it. Its the same as all the "romantic" men in women's literature literally being depicted treating women like disposable/interchangeable fuckmeat, but it suddenly becomes romantic because the character is described as 6' 4".
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 10:47 PM
3

Nah, a big part of the appeal of tall handsome men is the status they bring by being rare. An appliance that virtually anyone can have on a payment plan won't bring status. Every woman would be able to get a pseudotall pseudohandsome robot bf, and that would proportionally diminish its value to nothing. Women are all about going for a small proportion of men. Women already have outlets that fulfill the same purpose (vibrators, AI chatbots, romance literature, smut, etc.) and they all still despe…
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 10:46 PM
4

Narcissism. New one the teens love especially is covert narcissist. Basically the overuse of any extremely rare extremely intense medical lingo in a tumblresque fashion to refer to run of the mill experiences that affect 25%+ of the population like incels is extremely cringe.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 09:36 PM
3

It becomes creepy at the very first moment of it, before it has progressed. That is, initiating flirting as an ugly short man is creepy to women, regardless. The expectation is that short ugly men will know their place, keep their eyes down on ground submissively, and treat themselves as non-human asexual entities.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 07:38 PM
2

It has nothing to do with being a loser, that's bluepill nonsense. It has to do with being short and ugly.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 07:37 PM
2

Certain social behaviors, including certain kinds of physical contact, are done without discussion beforehand. There is no way to pre-emptively gauge interest for these behaviors because it is socially bizarre and repulsive to women to openly talk about them beforehand and the only way to gauge interest is to perform them and respond to his/her receptiveness. Touching a woman on her waist to let her know she's in your way in a crowded area is socially exciting to her if you're a tall handsome ma…
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 07:31 PM
2

Only if she lovingly plowed me with her feminine meaty girthy penis after and made me boypregnant so I could give boybirth the next morning on the toilet.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 02:47 PM
5

some bluepiller who doesn’t understand metaphor accuses me of saying women are animals They actually had to remove some symbolic language tests from standardized exams a few decades ago because they were too harsh a filter for so many people. I always think of this fact when I see an anti-blackpill/anti-science poster struggling so profoundly with comprehending analogical and metaphorical language. As to your post, makes sense. Gentler feelings in general fade away as you age because of experien…
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 06:28 AM
2

Society won't collapse. All these things are peanuts compared to the social upheaval of earlier times. Material wealth will continue to accumulate and material quality of life will continue to increase, while things like mental health and all that get continue to get worse. Things are going to get hectic, but society isn't going to collapse. At worst we'll have large scale slums and ghettoization, as wealth and social (including sexual) inequality continues to accumulate.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 06:26 AM
1

When a woman is genuinely attracted to you, she will do ALL the legwork and will be working overtime to get you in bed as soon as possible. This is the bare minimum to look for to confirm a woman is attracted to you.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 06:18 AM
1

There has been a shift in the last decade over Asian guys in the west, mostly due to the rise of Korean media here. It was a good play by the Korean media establishment. The pushed Korean media hard and promoted Korean men. And that has positive effects for all Asian men because westerners do not distinguish between different kinds of Asians generally.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 06:17 AM
1

It's an odd youtube video and the guy is probably just desperate to date, which is a bit taboo in India, where most partnerships are still arranged at some level. Since he wants to date and not have an arranged relationship, he's looking elsewhere.
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 03:45 AM
1

I've been looking through your comments where you go to posts about white guys with Asian women and ask why they're not with white women but I can't find any. Can you explain why you believe that certain races should have sexual relations with all races of women but others should not, which you express in odd implicit questions?
/r/AllPillDebate13/10/23 03:43 AM
4

Watching the statistics on the reverse brain drain back to China in the last few years would alarm any policymaker who hasn't stuck his head in the sand along tribalistic grounds. Basically anyone who is not a racist opposes affirmative action. The reversal is alarming, but if they can't get a fair shake here they should absolutely take their knowledge, IQ, and skills to Asia. Let the drain circling nepo dunces fiddle around incompetently.
/r/AllPillDebate12/10/23 04:45 PM
0

What does his race have to do with it? It is unethical and disgusting to distinguish him against other people because you think all yellows should be thrown in one bucket. He doesn't have to distinguish him against the orientals you hate, he has to distinguish himself against the general population. Which he did. Any society, institution or individual that discriminates based on race is one without human value and is on par with Afghanistan.
/r/AllPillDebate12/10/23 04:42 PM
1

And still catastrophically underperform Asians. An institution is not meritocratic if it takes race into account. Race is a broad form of familial association. Any institution which takes race into account is a nepotistic institution. Any society which permits this is fascistic and third world.
/r/AllPillDebate12/10/23 04:41 PM
2

You should always be open about not dating fat women. Fat is a choice, race is not.
/r/AllPillDebate12/10/23 04:40 PM
2

Because these are usually different women? You're saying these women didn't reject unattractive men who were not yet rich (men like the person being talked about) in the past? You need to give up these manipulative attempts at "gotchas". They're too transparent. If they were into/capable of genuinely romantically loving men like the subject being discussed, they would be married by the time they meet a man who started with little to nothing and worked his way into being successful, unless they a…
/r/AllPillDebate11/10/23 02:32 PM
1

Marriage without romantic love is prostitution and is a horrible basis for family and kids. He also can find women with a similar socioeconomic level if he's worried about gold diggers. If he's financially successful then odds are he's past the age where women use their youth to express their genuine love of a man. They don't make the kind of men they can romantically love wait until 25+ to get with them. So a man who worked/studied his way into financial successful literally cannot avoid gold d…
/r/AllPillDebate11/10/23 02:15 PM
1

The definition of romantic love.
/r/AllPillDebate11/10/23 02:15 PM
2

You are not understanding the concept being discussed or you are intentionally engaging another concept to throw off the discussion. Broke people fixed in a snapshot in time are not what is being discussed. This is not a discussion of associative pairing by class. This is a discussion of the class-independent transition that a man makes from one financial situation to another and how, if he is not tall and handsome, he must wait for women to take a financial interest (prostitution) in him to "da…
/r/AllPillDebate11/10/23 02:09 PM
2

This isn't "yes and no" though. You are firmly agreeing with him because the reality is that these same women would give it up in an instant to tall handsome jobless men, and casual sex is how women demonstrate genuine sexual attraction/passion. "Dating/taking a guy seriously" is a weird, manipulative way of trying to avoid the word "love". Romantic love begins with the sexual passion a woman expresses through casual sex. The same women you're describing had no trouble giving it up to broke lose…
/r/AllPillDebate11/10/23 02:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter