TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

theydontlikeme Archive

View 2 posts and 16 comments by theydontlikeme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
74

Well, calling it "unwanted contact" should surely increase that apparent lower level of shame... You're a man and you feel terrible about being raped? Oh grow up and be a man about it, it was only unwanted contact. I get unwanted contact every day I take public transportation at peak hours.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:03 PM
4

The keyword here is "drugged".
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:00 PM
3

But I think their point is that most of us should do something about some issues. You don't have to make it a full-time job to change the world, but every then and again, it takes very little time or effort to do something, and yet I bet most don't even come to think of doing anything. Case in point; shooting an email to this gym asking about their pricing policy is hardly a high bar to cross for anybody.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:57 PM
7

It's literally the #10 top post of all time on this sub, though...
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:03 PM
3

Crime, no. But her motives for committing the crime, moreso. The married part is also relevant, as the only reason she came forward with it was because she felt she had wronged the wife (in lieu of, y'know, the victim of the sexual assault).
/r/MensRights23/11/14 01:20 AM
2

The man had not been on any images. The original sentence was equivalent to "The man had no recollection of this." Apparently the word for "recollection" in Finnish is literally "memory image", which is why Google got confused.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 01:13 AM
2

The woman had later started to feel bad for having wronged the man's wife. At work, the man then got a Facebook message from the woman, according to which they had had a wild night and reciprocative touching. According to the article, the man pressed charges after he got the Facebook message from the culprit, and the 3rd woman telling him about the jerking off came afterwards. Finnish press apparently doesn't name and shame; which is good, but the stories become hard to follow when there's 5 peo…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:33 PM
4

Maybe it's splitting hairs, but I think there's an important distinction between feeling bad about masturbating someone while they're asleep because of what distress it may cause his wife as opposed to him directly. Also, at least due to the way the news story is written, it seems like the woman didn't originally contact the victim to come clean, so much as just high-five (after bragging to friends of course). Furthermore, while the size of the fine depends on the size of defendant's income, it'…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 07:05 PM
13

Here's a proper translation done by a human; http://pastebin.com/BCsrBw5J
/r/MensRights22/11/14 04:55 PM
67

Only because she had the decency to confess. Which she only did because she "felt badly for the man's wife". The man didn't even know it happened before the woman sent him a Facebook message telling him what a great night she had had.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 04:18 PM
1

Because I honestly did not mean to pick a fight. From a purely editorial standpoint, if you keep on referring to "people" throughout the text, and suddenly write the word "men" instead, it's a stylistic mistake, and one that happens to carry a sexist undertone. I wanted to correct that mistake in good faith, and offhand punishments were leveled against me. And pending Monadic's - or really anyone else's - explanation why changing "men" to "people" is misogynistic, anti-feminist, rape-apologetic,…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:56 PM
2

I did actually attempt to find a better word for it, but so far no luck. A friend told me of rather splendid Finnish word that's pretty much on the nose; http://bit.ly/16eWPbR - sadly there doesn't seem to be any direct English equivalent. If you come up with a nicer alternative word, I'll make sure to keep it in mind for the future :)
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:42 PM
2

This was the only edit I ever made on any Wikia wiki under that IP (they monitor cross-wiki vandalism as well). I can't say if someone else didn't have the same IP previously, and handed them the same kind of helping of 'grievous vandalism', but I have a feeling that if that were the case, I would've arrived there already banned. On most cases, I would absolutely agree with you that circumventing a ban is not cool. But in this particular case, I am patently unapologetic. I was banned over a sing…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:12 PM
9

I didn't mean to cause offense to any introverts with that, and I apologize if that's the case. But if you're the admin of a wiki, you shouldn't really have the choice to just not discuss a debated point. Wikis are social by nature.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 05:40 PM
15

When I made the edit at first, I thought maybe it'll ruffle some feathers, but we might have an insightful debate on the talk page. After the summary revert and ban, I already knew exactly where this was going to go. But as Loggins said, I just had to go down the rabbit hole.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:54 PM
29

I know... I always try to have an open mind. "They can't really be all that bad... surely not every member of such a big movement is a brainless hatemonger...", I say to myself. And time and time again I'm proven that yes, they really are like that. They really think this shit is right.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 03:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter