thisisabore Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. You are both telling me to give up and asking me to continue in the same message. Mixed messages friend, mixed messages. Also, I'm really enjoying how you are using this classic tactic of attacking me and my (lack of) intelligence rather than answer the point being made. It's neat.	/r/MensRights	08/05/17 12:06 AM
1	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. Ah, we are now entering the land of confusing correlation with causality. You actually don't know that they updated the article because of your message. Maybe other people reached out to them. Maybe they had an internal conversation following the first version of the article that was published, didn't agree, put a placeholder "we have reached out for comments and haven't received an answer" and now have updated the article to a better version of it. Of course they should point out the article wa…	/r/MensRights	08/05/17 12:05 AM
0	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. You are both telling me to give up and asking me to continue in the same message. Mixed messages friend, mixed messages. Also, I'm really enjoying how you are using this classic tactic of attacking me and my (lack of) intelligence rather than answer the point being made. It's neat.	/r/MensRights	07/05/17 11:57 PM
1	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. So, tell me, now that they've quoted extensively your answers in the article, how's that "the censorship is terrifying" and "they are terrified of words they don't wont to hear" position working out for you? Also, you use the word terrifying a lot. You may have some sort of irrational fear of things, maybe.	/r/MensRights	07/05/17 11:13 PM
2	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. Oh I totally can, in the face of convincing arguments and discourse.	/r/MensRights	07/05/17 01:45 AM
2	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. If this is the way you act when you are wrong , then feminists are right about you at least No idea what you are trying to say with this. you are wrong about your primary beef The fact your title is misleading? No, really, I'm not: you were not “published” in a magazine, you answered a few questions. I thought the difference between an interview and an op-ed was pretty clear, but maybe it's a cultural difference. This is not to say that removing your answers is right. It's not. Clearly they're s…	/r/MensRights	07/05/17 01:30 AM
2	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. Right. So the fact they changed the article and that it now claims that you didn't answer: shitty. The way they quoted you, excerpting your (far too long answers): nothing special. You are obviously very unprepared for answering the media, if you write super long answers, writers will sum it up because their readers won't read through paragraphs of drivel. Their summary of your answers is not even particularly manipulating, it's the beginning of each of your answers. If anything, they (somewhat …	/r/MensRights	07/05/17 12:29 AM
1	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. This was not immediately obvious. I'm looking at the archived version right now.	/r/MensRights	07/05/17 12:15 AM
2	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. Well let me clarify that for you: you are not correct, in fact you are clearly and completely wrong. I just checked (again), every single sentence attributed to PatriarchyTees in this article http://bust.com/feminism/19644-wtf-patriarchy-tees.html comes word for word from https://patriarchytees.com/pages/about. Furthermore, none of what is quoted in the Bust article appears in the 6 question interview you posted here. I'm not sure in what reality you live in to say that they excerpted part of yo…	/r/MensRights	07/05/17 12:08 AM
2	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. Published is a term commonly used for getting a piece published in a publication, not for answering questions in an interview. You wouldn't say Brad Pitt got “published” in the Washington Post if he answered an interview, you would if he wrote an op-ed and that was published. Furthermore, the Bust article quotes what they say are excerpts from your site (from the about section, specifically), and they all are (I've just compared the article and your site). Also, it concludes with: I reached out …	/r/MensRights	06/05/17 11:42 PM
2	I just got published in a leading feminist magazine, and the censorship was even more terrifying than I expected. Misleading title, it implies a piece you wrote got published by a magazine and that they censored your words. They talked about the things you make. Not the same. You may say they're not being truthful about not having obtained an answer from you, but the way you're framing it in the title is just misleading. edit: at time of writing, linked article didn't contain OP's answers, only quotes from OP's website's "about" section.	/r/MensRights	06/05/17 11:17 PM