| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Busted! Two women caught stealing a canopy on the beach, then attack.They tried to commit a crime. I don't see how discussing it is being overly dramatic. It's not like anyone is saying "Oh no! look at this poor man being victimized by the evil matriarchy! There's an epidemic of old ladies stealing and assaulting young men at the beach!" And it's relevant becuase not all men would have handled it so well. He filmed it and he didn't let it devolve into a shouting match or worse. I think this post says "hey men! Here's how to stand up for your rights if you ever fi… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/14 11:12 PM |
| 1 | Busted! Two women caught stealing a canopy on the beach, then attack.it is defined by gender instead of facts I'm calling bullshit. Show me one single law that says the man is always the primary agressor. I looked through a couple of these. http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/government-tyranny/primary-aggressor-listings-by-state/ I'm not reading every single law for every single sate. But here's what the law for first state on that list says: If law enforcement officer receives complaints from two parties, the officershall evaluate each complaint separately to … | /r/MensRights | 07/07/14 03:01 AM |
| 1 | Busted! Two women caught stealing a canopy on the beach, then attack.Maybe, maybe not. In any case he was smart to film it. I know that sort of thing happens. But I wouldn't go so far as to say that men who defend themselves from women are "more likely" to go to jail than their attackers. Not without some hard numbers. And that would be a really difficult thing to measure. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/14 05:13 PM |
| 34 | Busted! Two women caught stealing a canopy on the beach, then attack.Because she physically attacked him and he couldn't defend himself. Those women used that to their advantage. It didn't work but it's still a men's rights issue. If this had been two old men trying that scam, things might have played out a little differently. | /r/MensRights | 06/07/14 01:34 PM |
| 8 | This app Lulu, lets women rate guys they've dated. It is strictly female-only, and 3 million already use it. Imagine the outcry if the genders were reversedBecause it's linked to your Facebook profile. Any woman you're friends with on Facebook can write a review you of you and you can't see or respond to it.. unless you create a fake female profile on Facebook. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 04:29 PM |
| 8 | This app Lulu, lets women rate guys they've dated. It is strictly female-only, and 3 million already use it. Imagine the outcry if the genders were reversedSo it's different. There is no male-rates-female version of Lulu. Men rated on Lulu aren't asking to be rated. Okcupid users and hotornot users are. Your comparison isn't valid. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 04:11 PM |
| 4 | This app Lulu, lets women rate guys they've dated. It is strictly female-only, and 3 million already use it. Imagine the outcry if the genders were reversedThat's different. You have to create an account on okcupid or hotornot to get rated. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 01:54 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter