~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Rape investigations should proceed with assumption that men are guilty; believing that the allegation is false and should be proven is a "misplaced belief".Many of those are not brought to court as hundreds of women drop out at this point as they cannot face the ordeal of giving evidence against her attacker. That is unsubstantiated. The reasons they give for dropping out and their actual reason need not be the same. They are hardly like to admit that they made the whole thing up. You can check another source here: The Stern Review. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 03:54 PM |
| 12 | Rape investigations should proceed with assumption that men are guilty; believing that the allegation is false and should be proven is a "misplaced belief".5000 prosecutions, which represents just 6% of the actual reported rapes. It could be that all of the 'reported yet unprosecuted' rapes were in fact false accusations. Then again, it could be that all of them decided not to go to court for other reasons. There's not much evidence for either. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 03:41 PM |
| 23 | Rape investigations should proceed with assumption that men are guilty; believing that the allegation is false and should be proven is a "misplaced belief".No, it has a 58% conviction rate; higher than for armed burglary and murder. The attrition rate is high. Only 6% of all reported rapes make it to court, but that could be for any number of reasons, including made up accusations by women just wanting to name and shame someone. Until the name of the accused is kept secret along with the alleged victim's, there is going to be massive incentive to make shit like this up. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 03:30 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter