TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

threesixzero Archive

View 0 posts and 78 comments by threesixzero on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

"horribly traumatized" bull fucking shit
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:14 PM
3

I wouldn't agree that drug trading is a "heinous crime", not any more than what big pharma does.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:27 AM
1

Your question makes no sense and it is backwards...
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:41 AM
1

No, I'm saying this is not a men's right issue yet people are claiming that it is. When I ask how it is related to men's rights, they can't provide an answer. The analogy I used was if RadioShack employees insisted that their wires were also radios.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:19 PM
0

And what was in the data
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:48 PM
0

This article is about social repercussions, not legal prosecution
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:47 PM
1

What do you mean it is not a "real procedure"?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:11 AM
-1

My point was its a men's issue not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:10 AM
-1

Lol Sure let's say im really a feminist will
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:51 PM
-1

Just saying it's not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 07:38 PM
1

As long as they're not claiming those other electronics are radios...
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:17 PM
-1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7g9wdt/men_have_unwanted_sex_with_women_in_order_to/dqigwk4 In this comment you said the community disagrees that this doesnt have to do with men's rights. This is just one of the times you asserted it has to do with rights. I don't need to learn how to read, you need to remember the nonsense you claim as you are contradicting yourself, claiming you didn't make a claim that you did make but cant back up and has been refuted. After asserting this is a …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:35 PM
-1

What point did you make I already spelled it out for you at least like 3 times. Whatever, pretend you didn't see it, it's probably the only way you can still back out of this without admitting this had nothing to do with rights after asserting that it does. Lol
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:27 PM
0

Sure, back away from the excellent point i made that you cant refute. Lol. Call me dumb while your at it, make yourself feel better.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:16 PM
0

Sure, this sub could be about issues too, but you keep acting like this topic was shown to be about rights but it absolutely was not. Its sad to see how you are making a connection that isn't there - you're unable to explain it but you keep insisting it's there. Accept it, this is about insecurity, not rape, its not a rights issue. It's ok.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:11 PM
-1

You can act like i was given an explanation of how this is related to men's rights but i wasnt. I demonstrated this is an insecurity men face and an issue but not an infringement of rights or anything related to rights...
/r/MensRights29/11/17 05:07 PM
-1

The community disagrees this has nothing to do with men's rights? Must be why not one person was able to explain how this is related to men's rights...
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:53 PM
0

If any male issue could be discussed, then a thread about your prostate or your ballsack itching would be appropriate. My point still stands: this sub is focused around men's rights (as the name entails) and this has nothing to do with men's rights - this much can't be denied.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:44 PM
0

Jesus Christ dude that description of the subreddit is in line with what I'm saying. There is a difference between feeling you are forced and actually being forced. If men were forced into having sex (rape) that is obviously a men's rights issue, but that's not what this is. This is a case of men fearing social repercussions (insecurity) and though it is an issue for men, it is not related to men's rights in any way. All the people who upvoted this didn't question whether it fits in this sub, an…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:33 PM
1

No you absolutely didn't lol. I asked what this had to do with men's rights and you didn't provide a sufficient answer. Men feeling pressure is just that, a feeling, and has nothing to do with men's rights. As to your question, this sub is about men's rights, the rights of men. That should be obvious but it seems you don't understand that...
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:18 PM
0

Why Because this obviously doesn't have anything to do with men's rights. I did answer your question, you're just failing to see my point. If OP isn't blaming women and this is just an issue men face because of their own insecurity, then this has nothing to do with men's rights and doesnt belong here.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:03 PM
1

Why is this even here if it doesn't have anything to do with men's rights? That's the question you should be asking. If it's just an issue men face and has nothing to do with rights, why else would it be here?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:53 PM
1

My god. Read the comment I'm replying to, where he talks about hating women. The only thing I'm learning here is how narrow minded people on reddit can be.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:51 PM
0

Loooool people on reddit always find some way to back out of a convo when they realize they can't refute my point. How am i being "obtuse"? Just tell me how this is related to men's rights - fairly simple, no?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:50 PM
-1

How is this post about men's rights in any way? It has nothing to do with rights and is just a problem men face because of their own imperfection.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:35 PM
-1

I mean, dude, read the article, it is pretty clear. I did. It is about men feeling pressure And how does this infringe on the rights of men? This is a issue but what does it have to do with rights? You failed to explain the crucial part and stated the obvious.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:30 PM
0

So your issue is that I didn't quote enough of the comment? Lol.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:30 PM
1

I wasn't saying that's what this sub is
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:29 PM
-7

Thanks captain obvious, could you be more pretentious? What does this have to do with men's rights? Maybe you could be the first to tell me...
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:05 PM
0

I know what the definition is, maybe you should read the whole comment I was replying to again (namely the part where he said "You've so thoroughly accepted...that men's rights is about hating women").
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:05 PM
-8

misandrist Wow that is quite judgemental. I don't hate women and I am not saying this sub is about that.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:34 PM
-19

I thought this sub was about men's rights in contrast to the relationship between both genders, not about men's issues.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:46 AM
-33

That's too bad but this shouldn't be blamed on the women. You shouldn't have done it if you didn't want to. I'm having trouble understanding why this article is even posted in this sub - this isn't the fault of women, it happens because of insecurity on the part of the male.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 09:11 AM
0

Why is the number so high? Probably got something to do with their culture - are women just really promiscuous there or something?
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:34 AM
0

or we could just kill the mom
/r/MensRights28/11/17 11:31 AM
2

That was wonderful
/r/MensRights26/11/17 04:38 AM
1

you wouldnt think it be like it is, but it do
/r/MensRights26/11/17 02:45 AM
14

Saying only whites can be racist is racist in and of itself. Shame how some don't have the 4 brain cells required to understand that.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:50 PM
6

Considering the Internet is everyone's dictionary these days...
/r/MensRights25/11/17 12:49 PM
2

It says that 84% of women aspire to have enough money that they don't have to work after having kids, not that they actually have so much money that they would do that. The statistic is still significant though, thanks for sharing the source.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 07:21 AM
1

Paid maternity leave should be illegal.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:15 AM
2

Sauce?
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:15 AM
2

Et tu, k.dot?
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:44 PM
5

Lol dayum. TIL Macarena a ho ass bitch
/r/MensRights21/11/17 03:49 AM
1

Ahh the age old "why don't you just leave"? That is not an argument and does not invalidate my point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergo_decedo Yet you willingly choose to live with a group of people that tax I was born here and I am forced to pay, I am not willingly choosing to. If I hold a gun to your head and you hand me your wallet, you are being coerced and are not in a state to give proper consent. We are forced to pay under the threat of violence, kidnapping, and imprisonment. PS: By livi…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 12:45 PM
-1

Alimony shouldn't exist. It isn't right to force people to give up their hard-earned money for any reason. That is basically theft. You know, like taxation.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 05:31 AM
8

The first clue that they are one-sided and not for actual equality is in the name "feminism". People who want both genders to be equal are egalitarians.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 05:28 AM
-1

That's the definition of spineless - bending to other people's will because you can't deal with the consequences of being your own honest self. Edit: it would be smart to keep your thoughts to yourself in the future but it is spineless to back down from what you believe in.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:48 PM
4

Pussy. I understand if you downvote me for being harsh BUT he is a spineless fool.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 09:59 AM
1

Science has been shown to be wrong so many times and it is foolish to believe the current set of claims is infallible and the be and end all. Science has got nothing on my experience. Believe what you want though. ;)
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:41 AM
1

Ok, you can believe that if you like.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:33 AM
1

Then you can say the same for humans.
/r/MensRights11/11/17 12:16 AM
1

Really? Natural selection? That's how animals know to avoid danger? They don't understand that their existence is fragile and they are prone to dying? Ok you can believe that if you like. You can read a hundreds books about "how to ride a bike" but if you never rode a bike and you get on one after reading those books, you won't know how to ride the bike and you'll have to learn it like a kid does, from experience. You can read a hundred books about martial arts but getting in even one fight will…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:56 PM
1

Yea bro those are babies. How can ants walk or eat without a sense of self? How do insects understand death and know to run away from danger without a mind? You're assuming too much about ants.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:21 PM
1

And how do you know? Even ants have a concept of self - they wouldn't be able to get anything done otherwise (ex. feeding themselves, moving around).
/r/MensRights10/11/17 12:52 PM
1

I'm not making any assumptions. Consciousness is self-awareness, not simulated self-awareness which can be accomplished via computers. Consciousness is not about processing-capacity; if it was, computers could be more conscious than humans.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:42 AM
3

Consciousness is not the product of neural activity. One can make a quantum computer with more neural pathways than the human brain but that computer is not conscious.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 06:28 AM
1

vaguely-if-at-all self-aware How is a dog less conscious than a person?
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:59 AM
15

25 years for crossing the street Land of the free.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 04:56 AM
219

I don't think this has anything to do with the baby being a male. Though if the offender was a male, it would definitely be a different story.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:27 PM
30

Definitely do drugs if she looks like that at 18.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:26 PM
23

SJWs preach tolerance but they are just about the most intolerant when it comes to opinions they disagree with. That sub is a shithole.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:27 AM
1

Agreeable, but this high standard discredits any truth that is suppressed by the scientific community. Knowing science can be corrupted, one must not restrict his beliefs to peer-reviewed information.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:38 AM
3

Jewish moyels suck out the blood after circumcision (and there have been cases of herpes being transferred to the baby). Might as well use teeth to perform the circumcision.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:02 AM
2

Nobody's going to be convinced by non-peer-reviewed information People are convinced by non-peer reviewed information all the time. Just look at all the information the mainstream media reports on that's based on "anonymous sources".
/r/MensRights07/11/17 12:54 AM
-11

Is this what they mean when they say "CUCKED"?
/r/MensRights03/11/17 07:30 AM
7

Wow that is tragic. Women lie about rape all the time, Idk why anyone is ever surprised. Damn feminazis are cancerous.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 03:21 AM
1

Lmao
/r/MensRights23/10/17 02:14 PM
1

Lol well i mean if he believes his own bullshit, he is being genuine. I don't think anyone is that dumb though. He's part fool but also a liar
/r/MensRights22/10/17 10:47 PM
2

Lmao. Which would you vote for? I'd take the fool because at least he is genuine.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 10:39 PM
7

He's not very popular amongst the politically active here lol. fuck that guy
/r/MensRights22/10/17 05:20 PM
3

Justin trudeau
/r/MensRights22/10/17 04:15 PM
9

We have 3 major parties in Canada, and it's not really any better.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 02:38 PM
6

If an article like this was written about female politicians, it wouldn't be considered acceptable.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:22 PM
1

No, they are just comparing the leaders of the 3 major parties (conservatives, new democrats, liberals).
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:21 PM
1

Lol that was great 10/10 would generalize again
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:14 PM
7

lol god dammit >.<
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:06 PM
3

This is why we need guns!
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter