TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

through_a_ways Archive

View 53 posts and 2,813 comments by through_a_ways on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
73

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill14/09/13 06:14 PM
38

Field Reportthrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill27/11/13 05:04 AM
35

Off Topicthrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 06:01 PM
26

Rant/Ventingthrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 10:10 AM
24

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 05:00 PM
24

Off Topicthrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill06/02/14 08:31 AM
22

Metathrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill02/11/13 05:42 AM
16

through_a_ways/r/RedPillWomen23/03/14 07:13 PM
14

through_a_ways/r/RedPillWomen21/08/14 04:02 AM
14

Off Topicthrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 09:57 PM
14

Metathrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill12/07/14 09:12 AM
13

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 08:25 PM
13

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 02:37 PM
11

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:45 PM
11

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 04:16 PM
10

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill21/10/13 06:44 PM
8

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 08:03 PM
7

Theorythrough_a_ways/r/AlreadyRed06/02/14 07:29 AM
7

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 06:49 PM
6

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 11:48 PM
6

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 08:49 PM
6

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 05:25 AM
5

Red Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 07:13 AM
4

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 12:15 AM
3

through_a_ways/r/RedPillWomen24/05/14 07:01 AM
3

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill26/10/13 12:16 AM
3

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 11:23 PM
3

Men's Rightsthrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 08:44 PM
3

through_a_ways/r/TheRedPill18/11/14 03:16 AM
3

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 01:20 AM
2

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 06:42 AM
2

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 08:12 AM
1

Off Topicthrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 08:56 PM
1

Metathrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill04/05/19 03:48 AM
1

Metathrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill09/09/13 09:36 AM
1

Off Topicthrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 10:54 AM
1

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 06:43 AM
1

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 05:40 AM
1

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 12:17 PM
1

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 01:25 AM
1

through_a_ways/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 06:53 AM
0

through_a_ways/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 05:58 PM
0

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 02:19 PM
0

Red Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill14/11/13 03:24 AM
0

through_a_ways/r/askTRP12/09/13 09:48 PM
0

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 06:39 AM
0

through_a_ways/r/askTRP17/04/14 02:49 AM
0

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 02:16 AM
0

Blue Pill Examplethrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 08:54 PM
0

through_a_ways/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 12:19 AM
0

Metathrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 12:33 AM
0

Red Pill Theorythrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 04:31 AM
0

Metathrough_a_ways/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 04:01 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,813 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

well, if it works it works. I think some women out there are just incapable of being truly aroused. And that's not a problem because women don't need to be aroused to pass on their genes. So the trait of "low sexual desire" will persist in women because it's never actually done anything particularly bad to them.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/19 08:54 PM
5

real redpill is that none of humanity, or humanity's cultural achievements matter. It might have even all been done before millions of years ago by some other intelligent being, and you wouldn't even know it today. Just enjoy the decline as best you can.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/19 08:46 PM
8

not one piece of advice given would aid in boosting female testosterone levels Women aren't supposed to have high testosterone levels. Alcohol actually acutely raises T in women, which is why it makes them horny. But they also find it a lot harder to actually orgasm. I think there is a difference between a T-based and a non-T orgasm.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/19 08:44 PM
35

A lot of it was true, just not in the way you'd think. I don't know about chores, but most women just aren't good with hardware. If you just casually fix a doorknob, that will probably turn her on a bit, because it demonstrates capability in something she views as valuable. Doing the dishes? Ehh probably not so much
/r/TheRedPill05/05/19 08:42 PM
8

what's funny is how all these gen Z tards are convinced that men are just "conditioned" not to show emotion to other men. When really we just don't like being emotional with ugly hairy XY beings. IDK if anyone else has ever felt the following: sometimes when I'm feeling "emotionally vulnerable" or some shit, just being around dudes takes that away in a flash and makes me feel competitive and can-do again.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/19 07:57 AM
3

Sweden would probably get better if every ethnic Swede converted to Islam tbh
/r/TheRedPill30/12/16 07:53 PM
7

Social sciences are somewhat to the left of Che on gender issues. I highly doubt that Che Guevara would have anything at all in common with modern feminism
/r/TheRedPill20/12/16 05:45 AM
4

Given the way she pointed out his black dick I think there are some interracial dynamics here as well. I don't think so at all. She got fucked well by a black dude, so now she associates the two. Black = good fuck.
/r/TheRedPill11/12/16 04:59 AM
1

The entitlement is only getting worse these days because of what is being taught in schools and colleges and people like Bernie Sanders. Probably true--but entitlement is fine as long as it's constructive. I feel entitled to eat dead animals that led miserable lives. Is this a good entitlement? Yes, it improves my life (eating some meat is better than eating none). It remains to be seen if the BernieBros entitlement will lead anywhere. It's certainly been put on pause for the next 4 years. I mai…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 05:46 PM
1

So when society becomes insanely stupid and says men and women are equal in every way, this is the kind of shit we get. It has nothing to do with gender equality, and everything to do with technology. Birth control, lack of providership need for men, and the internet make the "cock carousel" almost mandatory. You could hypothetically nix every single gender studies department and every blue-haired, tongue-pierced, radfem tomorrow, and this would not actually change anything.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 09:08 AM
15

Only because they have to be. If they didn't have to be, they'd be as unrealistic as women. To use a political analogy, I'd compare women with the American middle class. From ages 16 - 25, and from years 1950 - 2000, they enjoy great prosperity, without realizing the immense leg up they had on all the others. This is their "normal". At age 35, and around year 2010, both of them suffer large drops in quality of life, because there are competitors who can do their job better. The woman's beauty, c…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/16 08:23 AM
7

Personally, I thought he was at his best during the primary campaign. I don't think he performed as well in the hillary debates, except for some strategic put downs. He seemed more "tired" to me during the hillary debates, but I guess at that point the ball had gotten rolling enough in his direction, plus her scandals.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 07:26 AM
0

I wanted to vote for him but abstained completely because I see a very nonzero chance of him starting a nuclear war. Trump isn't going to start a nuclear war, and Bill Clinton never raped anybody. People need to stop being faggots.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/16 07:23 AM
1

Men are attracted to looks, women are attracted to power. The only looks that women care about are physical traits that are identifiable with power.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/16 04:29 AM
8

Ever wonder why there are so many gay bars but zero lesbian bars? Because women don't have the maturity to run a business. It's because women have lower sex drives, and more anxiety about everything. If there were a lesbian bar, there would be much less raw desire for any given woman there, and thus less social validation, and less reason for women to hang around. In addition, the women who did feel desire would be less likely to approach due to anxiety.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/16 01:41 AM
1

That has very little relevance to this matter. Other Asian countries aren't taking in loads of foreigners either.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/16 05:42 PM
1

maybe this will spark a generation of Herbivore men in North America I have a suspicion about the uniquely Japanese phenomenon of "herbivore" men. (While the west has MGTOW or whatever, it's not as popular as in Japan) Asians have the highest spatial intelligence of all racial groups, and men have higher spatial intelligence as a gender. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of Japanese men were able to simply imagine the act of sex much more fully and vividly than African or Caucasian men. Why only …
/r/TheRedPill24/07/16 08:27 AM
1

I think night game is helpful as an avenue to develop confidence, but not really to get laid (at least at first). Anecdotally, my first lay was a girl I met in a library the day after striking out with random women at a club. Women were acting differently (in a positive way) towards me the entire week after.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/16 07:52 AM
16

If a girl sees that you danced with 10 other girls in the last 30 minutes, she is much more likely to be into you. This is harder to do when most of the girls there came with their social group from work, college, etc. The best way to game at clubs is to build a social circle and take them to the club. Auto social proof.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/16 07:49 AM
1

To the chagrin of some men on here, I would go even further and say that certain heterosexual preferences (along with all non-hetero sexualities) are evolutionarily maladaptive.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/16 03:15 AM
3

It gets even worse for the blacks. Eurasians are 5/6 of the world population.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/16 03:12 AM
4

Female energy makes babies Male energy makes excellence
/r/askTRP27/05/16 08:37 PM
2

Yes, September has started for Tinder, and online dating in general.
/r/askTRP25/05/16 08:54 PM
1

The thing is, sexual strategy is amoral but people are not. Not true. Strategy is amoral, but people are selectively and arbitrarily "moral", only as it relates to their own feelings. This is for good reason, worrying about actual morality would take a huge chunk of mental/emotional resources. Sexual strategy is amoral, meaning strategy is only concerned with an end result "is it conducive to acquiring sex?". People are every bit as amoral, being concerned with one end result "does it make me fe…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/16 12:52 PM
4

They THOUGHT they wanted equality but actually wanted all the perks and benefits that men had without all those pesky risks, obligations, duties, and responsibilities. Replace men with grownups, and women with children Then realize that women have more childlike physical features
/r/TheRedPill16/05/16 04:18 AM
3

Here's another hint: men have higher spatial IQs than women and larger heads than women. Racial groups that have larger cephalic indices (east Asians for example) tend to have higher spatial IQs than groups with smaller cephalic indices (Europeans/Middle Easterners, and Africans). Young people also have higher spatial IQs than old people, and young people have the biggest heads comparative to body size.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/16 05:29 AM
1

One of the 16 types will fit any individual well enough that they latch onto it. There is a specific personality component associated with individuals who base their identities around externally dictated archetypes. I don't think the MBTI can measure it, but it's probably associated with something like __FJ.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/16 07:22 PM
1

google "blue eyes sexual selection europe" There's a difference between being sexually attracted to pale skin/light features and being emotionally attracted to them. The latter is what I'm talking about, and in my experience, most guys agree that they can distinguish the difference.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 02:12 AM
6

Sexual selection is a more likely explanation. Asians have been grain eating for much longer than Europeans, and are still significantly darker. Cold climates favor male selectivity, and Europe supported more animal life than Asia. Thus, human sexual evolution advanced at a much more rapid pace in Europe than in Asia, meaning that the phenomenon of men choosing pale women happened at a much higher rate.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 05:42 PM
2

Women cycle between periods of highly submissive sex drive, and low sex drive with low submissiveness. By submissiveness, I mean the desire to "get fucked" by someone. Being submissive is inherently weak, so someone in a non-submissive state will be disgusted by submission. When a woman's hormonal goggles wear off, she will be disgusted by her one night stand. She may want to convince herself or at least convince others that the act was against her will to cope with this. This is especially true…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/16 07:18 AM
4

Men don't "differentiate" their attractions this way either. Literally no one does. On the contrary, I think a lot of people do. I can definitely tell when my sex drive heads into the more "beta", love-based direction, versus the sex-based, women are expendable direction.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/16 01:19 AM
3

These ladies admitted to being into rough stuff (choking, spanking, hair pulling, dog collars, face slapping, etc) and Ghomeshi was there to service them. Again, not a crime. But the feminazis ganged up on Ghomeshi and dragged him through the legal system. His career is ruined and nothing will happen to the women that ruined it. It's time to analyze exactly why false rape is a phenomenon. The following is standard knowledge on TRP: a woman having sex with a man is analogous to a man trying to wi…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/16 08:24 PM
16

Even if you were born with it: Life ain't fair, there's a 4 year old who just got eaten alive by flies in Somalia. Suck it up.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/16 06:57 PM
3

Good post, and 90% of TRP is biological, not intellectual. If you don't have that 90% down, this sub won't really help you much. The internet can't teach you to be a beast.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/16 07:18 PM
1

Not really. If you're going into STEM it doesn't matter much if your IQ is 80 or 105, both are highly likely to fail.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 09:42 PM
1

"equality" is something that should only have any meaning in the context of legal matters, unfortunately it's been perverted into something socialistic.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 09:41 PM
1

which means that males are more likely to have high IQs, since males and females are present in equal proportions in the population
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:02 PM
1

STEM is work Women do work by being female (investing reproductive resources) No such thing as a free lunch.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:21 AM
7

And it just so happens that those people will be overwhelmingly male because: 1) males are more likely to have high IQs 2) males have higher spatial IQs 3) males have more reason to do STEM work
/r/TheRedPill29/02/16 05:17 AM
2

Yeah, people tend to forget that all populations (including European ones) are already highly mixed (the difference is whether it occurred 500 years ago vs. 5000 years ago). Genetic diversity is only a problem in very small tight knit populations like Ashkenazi Jews, and probably certain castes of India.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/16 12:02 AM
1

Sex has plenty of physical consequences.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 11:44 PM
35

He may be pulling dread game but she is the economic winner. It's fine if he's seeing chicks on the side. She's just worried that he might be seeing those chicks for something more than sex. The quintessential female dream is to be the sole economic and emotional beneficiary of a man who fucks many other women.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 12:13 AM
1

I really believe that the argument about human evolutionary biology is void the moment sex is recreative and not reproductive Then you should analogously believe that any argument about calories and obesity is void the when eating is done for recreation, and not for survival, the former of which is the norm in modern society.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/16 12:04 AM
3

but in all honesty now is the best time in human history to have a child. No it isn't. Inequality is higher now than it ever has been in human history. And it shows no signs of stopping. And as we all know, it's not just absolute wealth that matters (having enough calories to live, being able to thwart disease), but relative wealth. People had dismal lives following the advent of agriculture, and female selection was far more hypergamous than during paleolithic times (confirmed by DNA analysis).…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 08:05 PM
1

"Only" is such a bold word. Can you think of another valid paradigm through which we can view sex, which simultaneously rebuts my point?
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 10:53 PM
5

If you look at sex through the biological imperative alone I believe that sex has other roles/functions for humans, more meaning to it, so comparing male sexual intercourse with a girl having close friends is a bit far fetched. But this is the only paradigm with any validity. The organism evolves instincts and functions which encourage the duplication of its genes, and the survival and second order duplication from taht vessel (the offspring). Womens' primary value comes from sex. This is becaus…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 10:39 PM
16

I agree with you, there's a lot of male hamstering on TRP. People selectively choose which issues they want to apply logic to, and which ones they want to perceive emotionally, so as to give themselves moral self importance. It's good to feel that you're right. However, you are not completely correct in this particular case. A man cheating with several women is not equivalent to a woman cheating. It is more equivalent to a woman having a bunch of close gay guy friends, or something along those l…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 08:06 PM
-1

I was brought up to worship women and give them whatever they want because they're beautiful and precious and innocent. No you weren't, you were genetically built to do all that stuff. Cute women are cute regardless of socialization, only women derive attraction from cultural influences.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 07:03 PM
1

The interaction is not males 'choosing' to mate masculine women for long-term commitment. It's hot feminine women delaying relationships as long as possible and for fun and profit. Then why do men rate more andro-looking women as more attractive for long term stints? Which girl sets your heart (not your dick) off more? Which one looks the hottest? My guess is that most guys will pick different answers. http://i42.tinypic.com/2rykryu.jpg http://www.wallpapersvila.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Cu…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 06:33 PM
0

I mean more "less feminine" than "masculine". Not hairy or muscular, but somewhat lacking in the sexual feminine features. And I'm not talking about sexual attraction, but emotional attraction/commitment. Because that's what matters for women.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/16 01:43 AM
5

I don't think the Chinese will have much taste for true war. The Chinese are probably more well suited to waging war than any other nation on the planet. 1) Shitton of males 2) Low quality of life 3) High ethnic homogeneity Contrast with the U.S., where people get anxious over eating non-"organic" food, women serve in the army, and 40% of the population has no real loyalty to the nation.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 09:46 AM
0

This is why I came to hate progressiveism. You're really missing the forest for the trees here. Step 1: Society undergoes a malthusian period of high competition for limited resources. This is a haven for men, and using their power, they sexually select women for neoteny. Step 2: The constraints necessitating high competition disappear. (IE: retreat of an ice age, technological advances permitting widespread food availability, etc.) Step 3: Men maintain their infantilizing (in a positive way) at…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 09:39 AM
3

Her : Because I didn't really want to sleep with him. But I did. IMO, there's something to this. Immediately prior to ovulation, women experience a surge of both testosterone and estrogen. They have low progesterone during this period, but the trend reverses itself after ovulation (low T and E, high P) The testosterone greatly increases the sex drive, I'll assume everyone knows this. Estrogen likely makes them more sexually receptive than usual. Progesterone is very low immediately prior to ovul…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 07:17 PM
1

So, how can TRP and Men's Rights align? Can they? No. If you're actually TRP, you realize that female privilege comes from a biological place: the more neotenous appearance of female women. As long as women look cute and men look like men, MRA is silly. People rarely act based on logic and conscious deductive reasoning. 99% of all actions are made by instinctive emotions.
/r/askTRP26/01/16 08:17 PM
20

it worked for minorities There's a reason blackpass doesn't exist, while pussypass does. Minority "privilege" does not exist (Asians). URM privilege is limited to getting affirmative action for filling quotas. Unwarranted sympathy for women has existed for over 200,000 years. Unwarranted sympathy for blacks and Hispanics has existed for a few decades.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 12:17 AM
1

When men are in charge and competent, when women are in a submissive position, everyone is happy. When women are in charge, no one is happy and they aren't competent. redpill life without redpill cognizance is the best form of existence. Unfortunately, it is also nearly impossible.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/16 10:50 PM
2

So you think, let's say, if all female black singers decided to date outside their race (not necessarly white, any race) they would lose following? It's not always about losing following, it's about the social indicators of status that a girl grows up with. If a girl grows up seeing X culture as the world around her, she'll stick to X culture unless she is transplanted into a new one, or the culture fades into obscurity. X doesn't have to be a strictly racially oriented subculture, but racial as…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/16 01:33 AM
3

I find rather curious famous black men dating white women more often than famous black women dating white men I think it has to do with the fact that almost all famous black people are part of "black culture". Society naturally segregates, so there will be relatively few famous black men who aren't "culturally black". Since most famous black people are "culturally black", famous black women tend to seek status within black culture. Since men are much less predisposed to status seeking and cultur…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 03:08 AM
4

He's right though...most classically attractive black women tend to have caucasian features and lighter skin, and very few of them are pure west African. The other appeal of black women is the stereotypical body type (huge butt, tiny waist) that they have. There is a subset of men in every race who finds this body type very attractive, but it seems like its highest in black men and lowest in Asian men. I think Asian guys pay a lot more attention to faces and tits.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/16 03:01 AM
3

West Africans are not hunters, though. They've had agriculture for a few thousand years at least. Also, a paleolithic lifestyle in a warm climate will tend to select higher testosterone individuals, because the women can fend for themselves with easily obtainable plant foods.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/16 03:38 AM
16

Basque and Etruscan, among others. The Uralic languages also qualify. My implication was that the patriarchal culture of the Indo-europeans dominated the matriarchal/egalitarian cultures of indigenous Europe. Spatial ability is paramount for huntergatherers, and very high spatial ability has been observed in both the Inuit and the Aboriginal Australians, both of whom subsist on hunting (and are extremely distant from one another in every sense of the word). Incidentally, there may also be an inv…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 12:35 PM
12

This is a red pill truth in itself. Most people hate the idea that our emotions are largely controlled by things that "aren't us": external social stimuli, foods, substances created by gut bacteria, biologically active substances in cosmetics, etc. It robs them of control, and they hate that. A look at boards like Futurology confirms this. People are enamored with biotech, because it gives them the hope of more control. Laughably implausible ideas like "uploading your memory into the cloud", or …
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 11:20 AM
1

Nah, it's biological too. Guys (and even girls) are losing their hair, or wrinkling, quite fast. I've legit seen girls my age with higher hairlines than me, and this isn't an exaggeration.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 10:14 AM
12

It's comical that there was an era where women looked at a man and evaluated him based upon his fortune and productivity. Now it's back to caveman where women want dick. Not at all. Status manifests itself in many ways. An unemployed drummer could not have been considered high status many centuries ago. He can be today, because we've largely eliminated the natural constraints of our survival (at least for the time being). A "dysgenic" sphere of status-seeking (punk subculture, hippies, etc.) can…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 09:53 AM
9

Couldn't be further from the truth. A paleolithic hunter is analogous to a modern day beta-drone engineer; a provider. Paleolithic societies were and still are not particularly masculine at all--the men were pretty much guaranteed sex, due to the egalitarianism and interdependence present in small groups. This was amplified even moreso in cold climates. Since woman-friendly plant foods were not available, dependence on male hunting was even more important. More men also died, and the men culled …
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 09:40 AM
2

Only a woman would look at a guy posing with a tech giant (Wozniak), a man interested in Google Glass technology, converse with a man who helped invent the iPhone... and think to herself "meh" because they aren't alphas. Genuine accomplishments, interests, intelligence, etc - they mean nothing to women. Girls only care about outward projected status and looks, nothing more. You're wrong here, Woz carries HUGE status. This chick simply isn't into tech. "Nerd" culture is huge right now, and the mo…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 07:38 AM
1

even the best, most productive women I have met are not great at strategy and weak with logic Completely agree I've never met a women that is capable of creating and enforcing a consistent boundary, which is the foundation of good parenting. Men are required for creating the boundaries I agree with this too, and I think it all stems from social acceptance. Women consistently outperform boys in school, on average. I found this to be true in high school, and even in upper level college courses. Th…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 07:22 AM
1

I think this is just a universally child-like behavior which persists in women because they are fundamentally more child-like. I remember many times in my childhood when I blamed others for problems that could have been avoided if I'd made my own independent decisions. For example, me and another two kids once got detention in 2nd grade. Teacher told us to miss recess and stay at Mrs. X's class instead. One kid says that we were supposed to stay at Mrs. Y's class, and the other kid agrees with h…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 12:52 AM
2

Pretty much. "I regret not dating this guy because he's successful now. However, I did have the opportunity to date him. Let me broadcast that to the world to up my status"
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 12:50 AM
1

Women are attracted to status, men are attracted to looks. Male status changes within seconds, female looks stay constant for about a decade (and then start uniformly declining across the board, though some decline faster than others). Men can never regret not going out with an ugly chick, because ugly girls can't become prettier. Ordinary men, however, can become successful.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 12:48 AM
2

As an autist who can't think for himself, I find that extremely offensive (because someone told me to)
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 12:47 AM
1

Eh, I'd say it was, but unintentionally. I don't think Avril is any different from any other girl. I see the song having two potential motives: 1) Trying to one-up a girl whose status seeking failed her in the past. The girl viewed the classical "fancy preppy" sphere as the world in which to seek status, while Avril and the skater boy were entrenched in punk subculture. Avril dates skater boy, whose "raw" status is now so high that it trumps that of the "preppy" sphere. Avril wants to one-up thi…
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 12:44 AM
3

It legit has nothing to do with the red pill. It has everything to do with the red pill, because women value fame a lot more than men do.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 12:31 AM
3

Considering the long term consequences of allowing small bits of harm at every meal? That's man-think. This is one thing I've never been able to agree with TRP on. Every bit of experience I've had with men and women suggests that women are on average better at getting their work done, being organized, and thwarting procrastination. The women I've known who were disheveled and tardy also tended to have other male traits--masculine looks, intellectual "creativity", no buckling under pressure, etc.…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 11:06 AM
-2

Only 25% of women can orgasm from penetrative sex alone, yet experts state that anywhere between 10%-50% of rape victims orgasm. I'd say there could be a self selection bias there. The average rape victim probably has different personality traits than the average woman. Rapes don't happen in broad daylight, in libraries, etc.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 02:47 AM
3

You consider CNN to be tabloid news? CNN has been tabloid news for a few years now.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 04:02 AM
10

Women have a very strong social component to their sexuality. The message of "who to like" can come from many different places: pop culture, niche subcultures, their friends, etc., but it always comes from somewhere. Men do not have this. This is what psychologists mean when they say that women have "fluid" sexualities. Their sexuality is significantly derived from cues of social status, and since these cues can change on a dime, so can their sexual attraction. Just look at how "nerds" were perc…
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 03:46 AM
-6

The red pill has existed for at least a few thousand years. Estimates of the first incidence of sexual reproduction go to 1.5 billion years ago. All sexually reproducing organisms share a common ancestor.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 03:34 AM
4

Women calculate too. They're just after a different solution than men are. Not the whole picture. Men are after a particular solution. Women are after the solution that they are told to look for at the moment.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 03:32 AM
43

You guys would have like Reddit 5-6 years ago Eternal September. This site is now a pretty good cross section of the American population, which means white, middle income, ~100 IQ, etc. The average person is not particularly perceptive or self aware. inb4 people linking me that xkcd comic. And yes, that goes for this subreddit as well.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 03:28 AM
3

Well there is personal gain from feminism from women Let's use two different, but fairly objective definitions of "benefit". The first definition is personal happiness. Does feminism make women happier? No, it does the opposite. The second definition is reproductive success. Does feminism make women more reproductively successful? No, it does the opposite. Therefore, it is not logical to support feminism if you are a woman (or a man). The reason women support feminism, other than social desirabi…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/15 05:50 AM
7

Feminists actually are a form of gender dominance. Islam uses a idol to justify their ends, feminists use hypocracy and strawmen to result in systemis subjugation. The difference is that feminism is not logical, while Islam is. Under an Islamic/Arab supremacist world, Muslims/Arabs/Middle Easterners would have better lives. Non-Muslims would lead worse lives. It makes sense to support Islamic dominance if you are a Muslim/Arab. Under female supremacy, men are unhappy, but women are also unhappy.…
/r/TheRedPill25/12/15 01:12 AM
5

A better example would be eco-protestors here in the west. Radical Islam ultimately makes sense; it's just an expression of the desire for cultural dominance. Obviously we don't agree with it because it's against our own interests, but it's mostly pretty logical. The people who protest miniscule killings of animals like whales, dolphins, lions, etc., are a better analogy, because the mentality needs to be brainwashed into you, much like feminism. Killing a dozen or so of these animals every year…
/r/TheRedPill24/12/15 10:59 PM
8

Anything for supporting a narrative I suppose, even if it means throwing the human condition under the bus and cheapening it The human condition is pretty cheap to begin with, there are 7 billion of us on the planet. You're not special, and the world will keep turning if a bunch of people die.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/15 10:34 PM
6

She's a white woman who ran away to India to go be a buddhist for God's sake. That's not a white woman. She's Indian, just albino/leucistic. Are you blind or something? And I'm sure she's had tons of suitors, since they worship white skin over there. The reason she has no partner is because: 1) Women don't settle for men who match their attractiveness. They need someone superior to them. 2) Men are much less concerned about socially desirable traits than women are. White skin and light features …
/r/TheRedPill24/12/15 10:21 PM
7

eternal september
/r/askTRP14/12/15 09:10 AM
5

Of course, it helps that she's not American. Unless you married a Russian or some other euro girl, this is just trading one form of currency for another.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/15 01:44 AM
3

lolwat literally nobody on here says that shit Do you even know what board you're on?
/r/MGTOW03/12/15 05:50 AM
6

Arabs(invented/developed Algebra and Arabic numbers 0-9 Actually, the decimal numeral system was developed in India.
/r/MGTOW02/12/15 09:08 PM
3

Between 1400 and 1950, Murray's historiometric method has found that 72 per cent of significant figures in the arts and sciences came from Britain, France, Germany and Italy alone. Right, and if you look at that even more closely, you can pretty much knock out Scotland, Wales, southern France, southern Italy, and even eastern Germany from those figures, without sacrificing much progress. If anything, this statistic is a hindrance to the idea of innate white superiority, because it shows that onl…
/r/MGTOW02/12/15 09:04 PM
1

She's upset that he took her on an international vacation to the Maritimes and then to a Bellagio suite in Las Vegas, but didn't give her the ultimate commitment yet - the wedding ring. Talk about gratitude. It's better to do nothing than to go halfway on generosity. Logically, doing a few generous things should be very admirable, but it is not. PETA recently offered to pay the water bills for poor Detroiters if they agreed to go vegan. PETA also provided vegan ingredients and cookbooks free of …
/r/TheRedPill02/12/15 08:19 PM
-2

Like how you want dirtiest and nastier porn, and then are disgusted with yourself when you come. I don't think men are disgusted by consuming "nasty" porn at all. I can see why women would be, because to be a woman in sex is to engage in an inherently demeaning act. You are bending over and presenting yourself to someone, to be used by them.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 08:58 PM
1

I actually think this kind of behavior will accelerate the end of gynocentrism. Gynocentrism is built into our DNA, so it won't ever end.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 08:50 PM
-2

The guy might not even be physically attracted to blondes, he might feel sex with a latina to be much more satisfying, but it isn't about the sex. Blondes are to brunettes as tits are to ass. It's just a matter of neoteny. You don't fuck neoteny, you fuck progenesis. Big booty bitches with large mouths/lips/cheekbones are what get men off. Slender, blonde women with light eyes and pale skin are what men want to marry, because those are better genes. It gets a bit complicated with Asians, because…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 07:33 AM
1

Real life is not like that. Men are stronger, obviously, but they are also much faster, have much better reaction times Speed is pretty much a function of how hard you hit. How hard you hit depends on how fast your fist moves, and both are dependent on the amount of muscle you have.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 07:26 AM
1

I'm not saying women can't be stronger than men. I think if you controlled for exercise and training, every single man would beat every single woman.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 07:14 AM
1

Doesn't help that males have faster reaction times either http://www.colorado.edu/eeb/courses/1230jbasey/abstracts%202008/4.htm
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 07:09 AM
2

I knew a dude who was no more than 6'1" say he was 6'4". Noone really called him out on it, but I'm sure all the guys knew he was bullshitting.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/15 05:01 AM
2

Same with height. 5'9", and have passed as 5'11" online with no difficulty. Unless a woman is about the same height herself, relative height doesn't matter a whole lot. 5 foot girls who want 6 foot guys just want the status boost from the magic number.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 11:58 PM
4

Functionally, yoga pants are actually a lot more useful for guys. They prevent chafing. Women have wider hips, and so they chafe less.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 11:56 PM
1

But conversely, if everybody were able to discriminate in this way then motherhood would be penalized and the birthrate would suffer. If everyone were able to discriminate in this way then motherhood would be a more sensible option and the birthrate would increase.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 06:35 PM
35

They are telling their young sons that they are innately special, that they are innately valuable. This is actually one of the more insidious truths. Boys need to be shown less love from an early age, because that's how everyone who isn't the boy's mother will treat him. Girls need to be shown a lot of love, because every guy who wants to fuck her will show her such love. If she's desensitized to this love, she won't sleep around with any schlub who shows her kindness.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 01:10 AM
3

AWALT never claimed that women were incapable of logical reasoning, but that they don't use logic when it comes to relationships. Men don't use logic when it comes to relationships, either. The logic thing is more that men are able to use logic even when it means admitting their own double standards, while women are not. And even here, it's a minority of men who do so (but an even smaller minority of women)
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 05:30 PM
16

Instinct obscures truth when it comes to the study of women, men are overridden by idealism, lust and paternalism and feel if they accept the nature of women In other words, emotion overrides logic, even in the minds of men. The only difference is that many men are lucid enough to acknowledge their biologically derived double standards, and are emotionally strong enough to embrace the hypocrisy of their actions. Women, almost without exception, are not.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 05:27 PM
1

Physical neoteny. Women have it. We're extremely good at sympathizing with infants, even of different species, because they so strongly display markers of neoteny.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 02:54 AM
3

SJWs bleat. And their success shows that bleating works. Bleating only works because the majority of them are women, and women are neotenous. Noone gives a fuck about ugly grown men bleating, unless there's a lot of money or power involved. Which there could be, in this case.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 02:52 AM
1

More simply put, just Eternal September at work.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/15 02:41 AM
8

I think women should get equal OPPORTUNITY I'll probably get downvoted for this, but I don't see why sentiments like these are lauded. There's nothing inherently good about forcing private entities to engage in "equal opportunity" hiring. There's also nothing inherently desirable in a media company being politically neutral. If I own a company, I maintain the right to hire whomever I want, regardless of their objective qualifications. If I only want to hire Native American quadriplegic men with …
/r/TheRedPill16/11/15 03:31 AM
6

I don't think so at all, with the key difference being the nature of women vs. the nature of black people. If you have an inherent unconscious desire to be socially inferior, it makes sense to be part of a system in which you are (but which puts it in nicer words). We accept that women do want to be inferior to their mates, on a subconscious level. Black people are not so fundamentally different from other human races that they enjoy being subservient. Women, on the other hand, enjoy this.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 01:56 AM
9

Generally women are more religious than men. They need to belong to something more than men. I think men are just better at handling the emotional stress that comes from the certain inevitable nihilist thoughts. If you don't belong to something, it feels as though there is less purpose to life. If you blindly elevate something as a purpose worth fighting for, without actually investigating why that thing should be upheld, then you avoid this mental dilemma completely. It's good for one's emotion…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 01:51 AM
6

Elaborate? POWs are in a humiliated state, I wouldn't expect that to work to their advantage usually.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 01:41 AM
13

There were also quite a few German women throwing themselves at American men, when the Germs were losing. They actually have a name for a generation of mulatto babies born to the black American soldiers. There's even a movie about one such kid growing up in Nazi Germany, he didn't get sent to a concentration camp for whatever reason.
/r/TheRedPill15/11/15 01:40 AM
5

The word "judge" doesn't really have any logical meaning when used in casual conversation. What it actually means is anything that makes the speaker feel bad.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 10:13 PM
-2

Everything everyone does is selfish, feminism is no different. I actually appreciate "female logic" more than "male logic", at least when it comes to anything practical regarding social/political factors. Male logic is like a preset algorithm that recognizes contradiction. It remains the same, and takes in a variety of data/inputs and analyzes it in the same way. Female logic is a more complex algorithm. It could be roughly described as "find what's good". It's a very vague task, and one needs t…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 12:49 AM
3

This isn't about gender roles, an anti-male justice system, or anything else. Yes it is. If it weren't for those things, OP wouldn't be in trouble in the first place. He's fucking stupid, but the "women are wonderful" effect allows his stupidness to be severely punished, while allowing female stupidness to go unpunished, even if it's orders of magnitude higher.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 06:21 AM
6

People (men included) do much of their "reasoning" emotionally. OP is right that you cannot fight emotional biases with reason. However, emotional biases can be overcome with more emotion. Example: emotional biases about romance and sex. People acquire emotional biases about knightly love from the media and society. Many men somewhat overcome these biases, not by using reason, but by experiencing more emotion. This emotion comes in the form of rejection, or lack of attention, seeing other women …
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 09:42 PM
1

It's from the show Rick and Morty. Rick makes Morty skip school, Morty's mom get's mad and says the above.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 01:29 AM
2

Eat less actual meat, but use meat flavorings. Bacon bits, animal fat, etc. That way food tastes meaty, but you're functionally eating very little meat.
/r/RedPillWomen03/11/15 09:33 PM
1

Don't people see the hypocrisy No, because women are wonderful Physical neoteny suspends rational thought and logic. People aren't themselves around children, cute animals, and women
/r/TheRedPill03/11/15 05:30 AM
1

I kinda took that for granted since the japanese have been doing this forever in their cartoons. And anime is addictively popular. Seems to work. Seems most of the time some high school setting with a high school kid. Or Saved by the Bell, et al, in the west. Saved by the Bell is a normal sitcom about a normal high school, albeit impossibly well timed, simple, and enjoyable when compared to an IRL high school experience. It lacks the adventure/magic/mystery element, which Harry Potter has in spa…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 11:07 PM
7

This is why things like MRA are dangerous to men. If feminists throw MRAs a small bone, all will be forgiven, and men will continue to live in shit, maintaining a prosperous civilization which hurts them. The only reason MRA gets support as of late, and feminism gets a bad rap, is because the hypocrisy and sexism toward men has reached extreme levels. What's really happening is that mainstream "normal" people are starting to consume what's been said by the manosphere 5+ years ago. Things need to…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 10:59 PM
2

I know of an 8 year old girl who figured this stuff out and openly declared it. And she's right. Elaborate? It's quite interesting to see how differentially parents treat their daughters vs. their sons.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 10:53 PM
6

You mean to say that Jerry "set up shop" in Beth's life?
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 10:50 PM
5

The popularity of Harry Potter stems mainly from its high relatability to its target audience. The average kid doesn't go adventuring with midgets and warlocks a la LOTR, nor does he engage in space travel. He does, however, go to school, take standardized tests, play sports, etc. The entire appeal of the Harry Potter series was its relatability to a schoolkid's life, and the fact that the book characters aged in real time as IRL children aged. As kids grew up, took SATs and learned to drive, Po…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 08:56 PM
2

I guess the latter is also partially the reason why men create new worlds for their stories. IMO, as a very broad rule, men are interested in external stuff, women are interested in themselves. Same thing happens with sex. Men tend to enjoy the women, and women enjoy the feeling of being desired (by the desirable man).
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 08:44 PM
2

You can distinctly tell when a woman is writing, they spend chapter after chapter writing about how 'he looked at her and made her mind go to mush'; basically, some female perception. This is extremely accurate. Probably the main reason female-written stuff makes me cringe.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 08:43 PM
333

Morty can't miss school. It’s not like he’s a hot girl, he can’t just bail on his life and set up shop in someone else’s.
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 06:50 PM
2

Men compete with men, not women
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 08:04 PM
6

Arguing with women is analogous to sex In sex, the more aware she is of your "neediness", the more turned off she is. In opinions, the more aware she is of your "neediness" of her support, the more she is going to oppose you. When you argue with someone, you are implicitly admitting that you want their support, and that their opinion matters to you Don't do that lol
/r/TheRedPill31/10/15 05:54 AM
4

The anger phase is natural not because you think it's not fair, but the fact that you realize you're expected to jump through hoops your entire life while all women have to do is not be fat, and they demand to be treated equally Right, but at some point you have to face reality, and accept that some things simply are, and cannot be changed. Men take care of women and cater to their whims. This is and always has been true. It's the only reason feminism could have ever existed. You don't see black…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 07:07 PM
2

Environmental generational amnesia doesn't only apply to environmental issues.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 07:04 PM
-6

Reminds me of that HIV+ guy from Quebec in the 1980s who infected some other fag and the other fag confronted him - and had sex with him again. I have a theory that a large portion, if not a majority, of gay men are simply men who rank very high on sex drive. If you theoretically like men and women equally, you will functionally be gay. And just as men who settle for chubbies manage to convince themselves that they prefer them, so too do these men.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 04:19 AM
0

society collectively beats men over the head with the reality stick assuring that the men who are this stupid pay dearly for their delusions. Women? Not so much. This is only true with regards to male-female conflicts.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 03:40 PM
3

I'm baffled if he ever gets laid again, especially considering that women hold resources in such high regard and he's proven he'll take them from you instead of provide them. He's pretty good looking and 6'5". Actually, that could be the main reason he was able to pull this off.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 10:40 AM
11

The idea of a woman getting alimony makes the woman feel good, so it's a good thing. A woman paying alimony makes her feel bad, so it's bad. The fact that the two positions are logically inconsistent and unjust doesn't enter into her thinking. Women aren't unique in this, though. The difference I'd say is that the vast, vast, majority of women are like this, while only the majority of men are.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 10:33 AM
3

"TL;DR: Feminism is its own worst enemy." Everything about male female relations, and their physical differences, draw a perfect analogy with adults and children. Would you treat a child the same way as an adult? Would you give a child all the same privileges and rights? The child will think they want these privileges, but they will ultimately be fucked over by them.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 08:24 AM
1

but please strive for an end goal of empathy as you move through the anger phase. Men might have the burden of performance, but women have the loss of control... the Christmas Cake This implies that we should not treat women as equals, and that we should not afford them the same rights as men. The problem is that we give women the same privileges as men, but absolve them of the responsibilities that men have. It's a logical inconsistency, AKA hypocrisy. Women's rights is a bit like letting 5 yea…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 07:52 AM
3

or some whore spending hours making videos on Youtube about how video games are more oppressive than the house of Saud, take a minute and think, "Is there money exchanging hands here?" I'm not familiar with how making money on youtube works, but for the vast majority of such videos I would not suspect money as a motive, especially if the user is not very well known. Money is a great incentive, but ultimately money is often used to buy pleasurable things. Posting on youtube, getting followers, pl…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 10:14 PM
5

Eternal September ensures more anger/negativity and also more unwarranted emotional positivity. Stoic TRP died somewhere around early 2014
/r/TheRedPill21/10/15 10:09 PM
13

Women don't empathize with men for the same reason that children don't empathize with their parents. The reason is twofold: 1) Women never experience the hardship of being male, much like children never experience the hardship of being an adult (until they actually become adults). 2) Women are more neotenous than men, and children more than adults. We are biologically predisposed to care for neotenous looking things. Adults care and want to protect children primarily because they're cute, NOT be…
/r/RedPillWomen19/10/15 02:56 AM
2

Guys who are already very attractive game uglies to get them out of the picture. It assuages the ugly chick's jealousy. The hot girl doesn't associate the ugly girl with the hot guy's status because they look so unnatural together. The opposite: if you're not very attractive, you probably shouldn't do this. Especially not if you look like you could actually be a normal match for the ugly girl. Albert Einstein can talk about how he failed math class, and it becomes an entertaining anecdote, a sig…
/r/askTRP19/10/15 02:26 AM
2

Dick size is irrelevant unless you're tiny. Anything above 5 inches should be fine for 95% of women. I think under 4 inches would be the point where you should actually worry.
/r/askTRP19/10/15 02:15 AM
1

Feminism profits immensely from it That's an understatement. Feminism can only exist because of it.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 11:10 PM
2

Most people are not rational, but rationalizing. I'd say that women are even moreso, judging by their lower representation in the higher ends of the IQ curve. Being overly nice itself is unattractive, and men who follow this strategy are probably self selected to be less attractive in addition to that. This makes "nice guys" especially unattractive. Women need to rationalize their disgust, so they construct the fallacious trope of the "nice guy". It's essentially on par with saying that "terrori…
/r/MGTOW18/10/15 10:36 PM
7

Why is it so hard for people, especially women, to see what they have put into an argument/misscommunication and have empathy for the one they love? For the same reason that parents love their children more than vice versa.
/r/RedPillWomen18/10/15 10:27 PM
5

OP is obviously a damaged person as well. Also lol'd at the 5 minutes late bit. Getting pissed at 5 minutes of lateness (unless you're in the military) smacks of mental femininity.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 10:08 PM
1

Even the OP has been indoctrinated to believe this shit. This is not true Indoctrination implies that the attitudes he expresses were instilled in him by some external agent (society, culture, schooling, media, etc.) Feminism is biologically hardwired into every male's brain. The social development of feminism simply harnesses this into something more focused and effective. If you said that "education enables people to reason", you'd be wrong. The mental faculties for logical reasoning are inher…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 10:03 PM
6

I wonder how much of this is due to the male populace of these websites. OKcupid skews older and probably more beta, so women have better financially and emotionally validating offers, increasing their price.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/15 09:52 PM
2

Women are less confident than men. It's just how testosterone works. That being said, it's not necessarily the main reason, or even a significant reason, behind the gender pay gap.
/r/RedPillWomen18/10/15 04:06 AM
2

I never said I didn't like wings. The guy in the video said he hates ranch with buffalo wings, but loves bleu cheese with them. I think they're both disgusting with them.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 09:33 PM
1

Objectively, yes, he is a beta. By becoming beta in his circle, he became an alpha among normal US (and global) citizens. That's assuming that Snowden is not a limited hangout, which he most likely is
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 08:35 PM
1

"Im a pretty decent looking woman but am NEVER asked out, advice please...." lmfao More evidence that there's no such thing as a free lunch.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 08:29 PM
3

Possibly the fact that this one has somehow remained hot for several decades has given her a unique experience and insight... Nope. She's 45, which means she has much less male attention now than 20 years ago. She may be hot for 45, but she's ugly for 23. She co-opts "manosphere lite" ideas and blames her decreasing lack of options on the "pussification of men", as if it were something that existed in a vacuum. Correlation =/= Causation. In reality, she is part of the reason that this trend exis…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 08:19 PM
1

women who said, "I'm just out if a man doesn't approach" and all sorts of anecdotal responses based on everyone's own experiences. Remember that this was 20 years ago. Women today are supersaturated with male attention, no matter how physically unattractive they are. Analogy: Imagine having free wagyu beef every day of your life. You wouldn't touch chuck meat from a normal cow. Now imagine forced vegetarianism for 5 days out of every week. Even Taco Bell-tier ground beef would be amazing.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 08:00 PM
1

Seriously, I lurk and occasionally interject but I notice we definitely get divided between the angry and the stoics here. This wasn't much of a problem two years ago.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 07:58 PM
1

deep-fried portions smothered in ranch dressing. Bleu cheese with wings is still pretty fucking disgusting
/r/TheRedPill17/10/15 07:10 PM
7

Must have been a completely different world. It was less than a decade ago, too. Even facebook didn't get too popular until 2008, and tinder was non existent until just a few years back.
/r/askTRP17/10/15 05:49 AM
4

no, it's worse. In the real world, you get to see both the good and the bad. Facebook/Instagram on the other hand is self selecting, so people just post the good stuff. And again, facebook is not novel in this regard. Every entertainment medium ever created is guilty of this. Films, television, books, and even the news portray the exciting and ideal points of life far more often than the mundane, boring ones. Jokes are perfectly set up, and have a laughtrack that makes people subconsciously find…
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 01:10 AM
3

Facebook is a shithole and a disease. Facebook is just a piece of software. At some point you have to fault people for their own choices, and not inanimate objects.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 01:05 AM
0

Yeah it's highly unlikely that will happen. It happens all the time, otherwise noone would be married.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 10:36 PM
8

Pretty sure there's supposed to be /s on the end. I don't think it was meant to be sarcastic, but just the way that the other gender views things.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/15 05:42 AM
3

nah I think there will be a lot of eating going on too
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 01:13 AM
34

Exactly this. "You're husband material, I'll fuck those other guys and marry you" is an insult. "You're wife material, I'll fuck those other girls and marry you" is a compliment of the highest order.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 01:11 AM
3

Ugly girls need to do more in order to get the same amount of validation as a pretty girl.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 05:13 PM
2

because of how fucked up unpopular feminism really has become* Clearly these actresses are intelligent or were attractive* to make millions of dollars. Never understood why people always point to feminism as some sort of singular particular cause of failed gender relations. Feminism only a result of the greater problem.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/15 03:34 PM
23

That is the correct conclusion
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 11:50 PM
0

Men and women cannot ever get along because we are locked in evolutionary warfare. And this is untrue. Men and other men are locked in evolutionary warfare. Outside of other social influences, men and women form a mutual symbiotic relationship. Woman provides sex, man provides resources. The woman spurns the man only when an outside influence (a better man, the government, a conquering nation, etc.) competes against that man and wins. If children were taught at school to hate their parents and r…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 06:43 PM
2

Women's hypergamy and men's polygamy are at odds. That's not true. Hypergamy and polygamy complement each other. If men were less polygamous, women would have less opportunity to be hypergamous. If women were less hypergamous, then attractive men would have less opportunity to be polygamous. I think what you mean to say is that women's hypergamy and men's desire for women are at odds.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 05:43 PM
2

my female friends don't understand men and they don't want to, so i usually just smile and nod instead of getting into that exhausting discussion This is the correct response to 99% of social interactions, not limited to ones with women.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 07:42 AM
0

The reason the sexes can never get along is the same reason that parasites and hosts can never get along. It's the reason why predators and prey can never get along. Bad analogy. If the host has all the power, the parasite dies. This is bad for the parasite. If the prey has all the power, the predator goes hungry. This is bad for the predator. If the man has all the power, both men and women live happily and satisfied, this is good for everyone. A much better and truly biologically relevant anal…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 07:40 AM
59

In Japan, women state the perfect male height as 5'9" - 5'11". The average male height in Japan is 5'7". In America, women state the perfect male height as 6'0" - 6'2". The average male height in the US is 5'10".
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 07:31 AM
23

It is a stroke of genius and should be seen as such. It's not genius, it's just a way to make money. If people give me free money because they're fucking retarded, that doesn't make me a genius. It makes them stupid.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 07:28 AM
25

I've heard people laugh off his jokes and say "it's just comedy." It's ok to laugh, it's not really real. Fuck that; this guy is a genius. That's because the only acceptable way to state reality is through humor. It also gives you plausible deniability.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/15 07:25 AM
1

This is justifiable Anything is potentially justifiable if it carries the right emotional overtones. I'm not a fan of George Carlin, but I especially like his quote about "half of people being stupider than average". The vast, vast majority of people operate on emotional conditioning, and not logic, to a significant degree. You can see this in spades on reddit, and I'm betting the IQ average for reddit is at least 110. The average for whites is 100.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 08:19 PM
0

No, it is not. Vitamin D promotes the absorption of calcium. Despite having lower amounts of Vitamin D, blacks and Hispanics still have higher bone mineral densities.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 12:01 AM
1

http://nymag.com/thecut/2015/06/why-some-people-will-look-25-forever.html A "youth preserving" gene has an incidence of 10% in whites, and 20% in blacks. Calcification: Google calcification rates for the pineal gland, arterial, and other soft tissues by race. Additionally, you can google osteoporosis and bone mineral density rates by race. You'll find that the racial trend directly correlates to melanin content, and not genetic relatedness (IE: dark but caucasoid Indians group with Africans, and…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 09:39 PM
1

And blacks are astronomically more likely to suffer from sickle cell anemia than caucasians, which can easily be a fatal disease. And whites are much more likely to have cystic fibrosis, and hemochromatosis. Not sure what your point is here. I was discussing senescence, not well defined diseases which affect small minorities of the population. The conditions I listed are traits which appreciate with age across all individuals.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 09:32 PM
1

I often think signs of early slut behavior is women investing in masculine activities to "learn" the opposite sex at a young age To some extent it's even simpler than that. Androgens ---> Sex drive Androgens ---> Masculine interests But your reasoning is probably partially correct.
/r/askTRP30/09/15 09:12 PM
0

Eastern Mysticism I'm of the opinion that "eastern mysticism" is just the manifestation of an attitude of humility. Asian culture is much more humble than western culture, and even mainland European cultures are more humble than Anglo culture. If you look at human scientific achievement, virtually all of it comes from Europe. However, a huge majority of European achievement comes from England, west Germany, Benelux, north France, and north Italy. Essentially Germanics. A mental test that reveale…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 06:58 PM
1

I'm white and I think it's true. It's also not limited to whites, but all Caucasian peoples. Caucasians develop skin wrinkles, liver spots, baldness and female hair loss, and other age related diseases earlier and with greater intensity than Africans or Mongoloid peoples. In addition to that, Europeans specifically suffer from additional accelerated aging, due to the lack of melanin in both skin and eyes. Skin cancer is the most commonly known one, but cataracts and macular degeneration are also…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 06:44 PM
2

I think its absurd that voting is a right rather than a privilege. It's very sad that people have changed the definition of human right to "stuff that I want the government to give me"
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 05:00 AM
4

Then anything remotely anti-government because they are probably domestic terrorists and we have to keep the kids safe. "Protect neoteny" is a very common, emotionally derived, "moral" compass. Men consented to feminism because women are neotenous and men love women. Everyone consents to absurd laws against child pornography (to the point where you can throw a flash drive in a window to get someone arrested, and even drawing pornography is illegal in some areas) because children are the standard…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 04:56 AM
2

were enslaved by blacks Not blacks, browns. And so much so that half of Europe is named after the phenomenon.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/15 04:45 AM
8

Women also overstate their partners height by a long shot. I'm barely 5'10", and I've had short and average girls think I'm 6'.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 10:55 PM
12

the whole "checklist" mentality is a real thing nowadays for entitled Western women. Because men let it be If I had the same availability of women that women have of men, I would probably never fuck a girl who didn't have blonde/red hair, light eyes, perky tits, and big lips
/r/TheRedPill28/09/15 10:52 PM
19

Maybe we just don't want a basic bitch as president lol The problem is that ~95% of women fit that stereotype to a significant degree
/r/TheRedPill27/09/15 04:11 AM
4

that's not changing any time soon. I highly doubt that. If you look at shows for small children and teens, there are loads of white female/non-white male pairings. A brief stint on any European dominated penpal website (not American) will reveal every other <20s girl as obsessed with Korean, Japanese, and even Chinese pop idols. As you go forward in time, the power of women relative to men increases, and the power of non whites relative to whites increases. You're speaking from an absolutist sta…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 06:02 PM
-1

The west is synonymous with feminism. The western philosophies (really they're more specifically Anglo values) of liberty, individualism, and self determination, are what makes the west great. You could theoretically have a white civilization without feminism. But that would also necessitate the absence of trains, computers, modern plumbing, etc. Female sexuality is only controlled by male necessity. After male necessity goes, hypergamy and serial monogamy runs amok. Social shaming of female sex…
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 05:55 PM
-3

The west will fall, and Islam will also fall. And they'll both rise again eventually.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 05:46 PM
0

There are a million reasons to join the military, and a million not to. I can think of only one reason to join the military, and about a million not to
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 01:33 PM
1

He has a point though, soldiers are not very smart. Engineers aren't alphas, but the people who order the engineers to make the weapons for the soldiers to play with and die definitely are
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 01:31 PM
1

NIMBY The age old societal deception
/r/TheRedPill25/09/15 01:27 PM
1

6'3"
/r/askTRP23/09/15 08:32 AM
1

Has TRP made you lose friends? No, because I don't talk about it IRL.
/r/askTRP20/09/15 12:13 AM
1

Who happens to be a 29 year old virgin That was the part that made me laugh first
/r/askTRP20/09/15 12:12 AM
2

I think a good way to gauge intelligence on reddit is to try to get a sense of the "emotionality" of a person's average comment.
/r/MGTOW20/09/15 12:09 AM
1

A person with a high IQ and a tablet full of surgical videos, or someone formally trained as a surgeon? Someone formally trained as a surgeon. Same reason why I'd trust a farmer for advice about plants over a guy who graduated summa cum laude from MIT. Surgery requires knowledge and physical prowess first and foremost; actual fluid intelligence takes a backseat. A mathematician with a high IQ isn't necessarily any good at biology. Hogwash. Fewer people can successfully study math than can study …
/r/MGTOW19/09/15 11:52 PM
4

The hotter Becky is, the hotter the guy she fucked appears to be.
/r/askTRP19/09/15 05:45 PM
2

On the flip side, a lot of the lower quality manosphere contributors complain about the exact same thing. The reason so many men have trouble getting women is because other men in general have such a high sex drive that many are willing to fuck anything (even goats, in times of desperation)
/r/askTRP19/09/15 05:44 PM
2

Not just that, but also the increasing number of novel chemical compounds we come into contact with every day. r/K goes a lot deeper than what you said, r selected animals also tend to have higher adrenaline responses. This means they tend to be more aggressive or more anxious. They also develop faster, and the shift toward r selection in modern societies might translate into a downward trend in IQ. Over time, people's IQs have been increasing, but their average age of puberty has been decreasin…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 03:47 PM
6

I regularly see women in their 20s with receding hairlines. Not just big foreheads, but stuff that looks like actual male pattern baldness. The genes in this country are fucked from years of perverse social, environmental, and nutritional conditions.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 01:49 PM
1

Men have better spatial intelligence, are more likely to have higher intelligence in general, and are inherently more interested in spatial/science/tech subjects. That's the trifecta for men in STEM.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 04:07 PM
2

We are actually shifting back to hunter-gatherer behavior. We are indeed. A lot of people lament on how young adults today stay in a period of "extended adolescence". The exact opposite is true, biologically. Both men and women have been experiencing puberty at earlier and earlier ages for several decades. This is in line with r selection in the spectrum of r/K. There's also been a quantifiable shift of male sexual interest from breasts to ass, at least here in North America. I don't have any di…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 12:31 AM
1

Yeah, this is a good point. Everything that makes men slaves to women would also make them even bigger slaves to sexbots. "Women are wonderful" is a physical effect, and sexbots at this very moment are more physically neotenous (and thus, more worthy of sympathy) than 99% of women. All that's left is perfecting speech, and then it's all over.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/15 12:21 AM
4

At her size it just looks like a cartoon character or an alien. Also it's all fake.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 11:56 PM
6

The problem here is that females in the monkey/ape species have had a monopoly on reproduction for millions of years. True, but it's much deeper than that. Female vertebrates, invertebrates, plants, and fungi have had a monopoly on reproduction for about 1.5 billion years. Male disposability has existed for nearly 40% of the earth's life.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 11:54 PM
5

However, a girl who owns a vibrator is not seen that way by men. Yeah, she might very well be a slut. Men like women primarily sexually, women like men primarily socially. Social status has zero bearing on what a man thinks of a woman sexually. It has a lot of bearing on what a woman thinks of a man sexually. Women are more sexually attracted to men if they know that other women are already attracted to him. This is true independent of the man's actual looks, height, etc. The reason this phenome…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 11:49 PM
2

Worst case scenario of survivor ever Eh, idk. Could be even worse, they could die. For a woman, enslavement >>> death.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 11:40 PM
1

Women are indeed children. Men care for and give special treatment to women in the same way that adults do so to children. Male physical features are to female ones as adult features are to youthful ones. Women have a plethora of neotenous physical traits, men have none.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 10:44 PM
2

Not to mention that Arabs/Maghrebians raided Europe for sex slaves to such a large extent that there's an entire European ethnic group named after the phenomenon
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 09:00 PM
-2

Looks>>>Money/Status I would consider height to be a form of status. Height is also easily quantifiable, while facial aesthetics are not. This means that it's much easier to judge whether a man has a good height than a good face. I think most people would agree that having a large height and average face is better than having average height and an attractive face. My opinion is that Status > Looks > Money. Looks can be a form of status in themselves, separate from the actual aesthetic beauty or …
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 07:01 AM
2

because everybody know what misogyny is, but misandry is a fair tale. typo that actually makes sense
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 05:18 AM
3

The truth is feminists wouldn't know what the fuck to do with 100% equality. The "women are wonderful" effect is due to physical neoteny. Women are a lot more childlike than men in their appearance, so we sympathize with them more, and enjoy being around them. Men are analogous to adults, and women are analogous to children. Using this analogy, "gender equality" would be the equivalent of "growing up". Lots of kids dream about growing up, and develop a false sense of jealousy regarding the lives…
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 05:17 AM
8

Nah, I don't think so. Sweeping generalizations are very uncommon in this subreddit. A generalization is something that prescribes a general rule. "Men are better than women at math" is a generalization. There's a lot of this in this subreddit, as well as every other subreddit, offline news source, and pretty much anywhere where people say things. A sweeping generalization is when someone takes a generalization and expands it power to unjustified levels which are not supported by evidence. "99.9…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 08:14 AM
2

You can't legitimately ask why they raise their children badly. It's like asking why people with Down's Syndrome have Down's, when it's better to not have Down's. Single mothers are maladaptive. They're evolutionary failures, analogous to unattractive/unsuccessful men. We live in a society that enables single motherhood to thrive, so their spawn (particularly daughters) are not guaranteed to be evolutionary dead-ends. A hunting/fishing oriented society would nix single mother types.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 08:01 AM
1

And society pays for all these worthless fucks to propagate their genes. It's easier to rule over dumb people than smart people
/r/TheRedPill03/09/15 07:13 AM
1

You are if you have a very feminine face. What I stated is just a correlation.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 09:05 PM
1

alpha = powerful man who stands to benefit from immigration and liberal policies beta = weak man who cannot compete with newcomers to his realm, and wants help for native men For the record, I'm conservative, but there are multiple ways to frame what you said. If there weren't alpha people on both sides of the political spectrum, neither of the sides would be viable. A better political qualification would be: beta = anyone who lives vicariously through politics.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 01:13 AM
1

Betas are narcissists, they think they are acting alpha by always bragging, trying to prove themselves (approval-seeking), and compensating for their own insecurities. In short, betas behave like women.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 12:55 AM
1

"Overreaction" is the key word here. There's a difference between calmly expressing admiration, and going apeshit.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/15 12:51 AM
0

Unfortunately, that is false
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 08:57 AM
3

"Raising awareness" is code for bullshit
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 07:26 AM
9

I like how obvious the logical disconnect is. Almost all the people commenting negatively on different-age couples would also affirm that you "shouldn't judge others".
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 07:24 AM
3

Men age like cheese, women age like milk. Cheese eventually goes bad too, but not nearly as terribly as milk.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 07:14 AM
5

(low amount of fertile ovaries) hilariously incorrect terminology there. You mean ova or eggs.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 07:01 AM
-2

They also know that men run this world. They really do, not saying women aren't vital, but men build the buildings, govern the lands, fight the fights, etc. Only the governing example works. Doing grunt work is not "running" anything.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 06:59 AM
1

I think most people accept that Pakistanis in the UK are associated with pedophilia, but very few accept that western European elites are.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 10:37 PM
5

Because once you start to see one facet of reality, you begin to see other facets of reality. That's why there's such a big intersection between antifeminists, race realists/HBD, antisemites, libertarians, etc.
/r/askTRP31/08/15 10:35 PM
2

Okay, I only pointed that out because you said: Not true. The best chess players cannot beat computers. For this to matter, the best poker players need to have a win ratio against computers that is better than another computer. Also, the skill involved in poker is not a logical skill, but a social/emotional one, something which computers cannot replicate.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 09:23 PM
4

I think he meant to say "comparatively better" Men are probably better than women at both tasks. But if you compare high coordination, quick thinking, reflexive activities (basketball, soccer, ping pong) to low reflex, concentration activities (chess, golf, curling), men are far better at the former, and women have the comparative advantage at the latter. This in line with what I've observed in academia. Women, no matter how high their grades, almost always flounder on competition type tests whi…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 09:09 PM
1

Poker is highly influenced by luck. The only luck factor in chess is black or white, and even then you can do repeat trials where players switch colors. You can't do repeat poker trials where players switch hands, lol.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 09:01 PM
4

Yes, both girls and boys with higher androgen levels show a greater interest in "male" toys (read: spatial and motion oriented, rather than personal and social oriented).
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 08:59 PM
7

and whilst men mightn't have higher IQ's on average than women Men have had higher IQs on average for a pretty long time. It was only a couple of years ago that female IQ reached equality, and I'm not sure how much of that has to do with biasing the tests. Non verbal IQ would be significantly greater for men, and coupled with the higher standard deviation for men, would produce far more male geniuses in any non verbal field, including chess.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 08:58 PM
12

Or, looking at it another way, the queen is so oppressed that she does all the work, when really the king is what ultimately matters. Like an alpha lion and his harem
/r/TheRedPill31/08/15 08:55 PM
13

"a car with a lot of mileage is going to give you problems" If there was no way to discern the mileage on a car, everyone would use taxis.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/15 09:39 AM
1

This phenomenon happens all the time in other species.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/15 07:43 PM
15

TRP has simply met the same fate of every other community, product, business, nation state, etc., in human history. Most people are average. Average people don't know the difference between good and average. When something good is created, good people consume it. After word of its quality spreads, average people consume it. Since most people are average people, this creates a much larger market than just good people. This means that the creators can afford to lower the quality and increase their…
/r/askTRP29/08/15 08:53 AM
1

Marriage is the most extreme form of oneitis
/r/TheRedPill27/08/15 04:54 AM
0

I still think socialization is a miniscule reason for the differentials.
/r/MGTOW25/08/15 04:50 AM
1

Black women have higher levels of testosterone. Same reason why they're more likely to reach orgasm than white or asian women.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 12:19 AM
-1

Many "Jews" are predominantly of Germanic/Slavic gentile descent. And there are plenty of old money WASPs still left.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 10:36 AM
4

The superior race are the economic elite
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 08:31 AM
2

Almost all girls _______ and most couldn't tell you why.
/r/askTRP23/08/15 05:32 PM
1

While there are intelligent women out there that have put in the effort required to inform themselves on 'deep' topics, they are few and far between. It has nothing to do with effort, it's just an interest. Most women just don't have that interest. Most guys don't either, but the portion that do is probably 20x larger than the portion of women that do. It's related to IQ curves.
/r/askTRP23/08/15 05:29 PM
2

Jacking off to porn feels really good and its effortless and just about free (unlike sex with real women). It also means you don't need to depend on women for sex. Definitely. There's a lot of concern on the internet regarding overmasturbation and porn use, and the concerns are very valid. However, if you check out nofap or pornfree, many of the arguments are framed in a way that emphasizes men having unrealistic standards because of this (AKA women are the victim paradigm). Meanwhile, the amoun…
/r/MGTOW23/08/15 05:14 PM
0

Society gives women what they want on a plate and expects nothing from them in return, is it any wonder that so many of them are sub-par thinkers? I don't think so. Androgens just make you more interested in certain things.
/r/MGTOW23/08/15 05:10 PM
2

we don't need some spaz coming up with ridiculous womanly names for everything. Labels have always struck me as feminine and irritating. I would bet a lot of money that the first people to coin terms such as "foodie", "selfie", and "earthporn" were women. Using a label minimizes self importance. "I'm a foodie" shows that you consider yourself part of some greater movement (one with a stupid name, at that). "I'm enthusiastic about food" shows that you have a hobby. It's herd mentality/external va…
/r/MGTOW23/08/15 05:06 PM
1

Same as how people assume that good looking people are stupid. "Blonde jokes" exist precisely because of this tendency. People have an innate sense of "justice", even down to genetic advantages. If someone has a genetic gift in one area, we like to think that they are deficient in some other area to make up for it, so that they are not entirely superior to ourselves.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 11:37 PM
1

I believe that, had Tesla's goal been business and riches, he have outperformed Edison there too. My suspicion is that the qualities which make one genius also make one less predisposed to covet money and sex. Geniuses have a deep thirst for knowledge, and a very high capacity to learn at a very fast pace. You can view this as mental neoteny. Another form of mental neoteny is low sex drive, and perhaps low "conventional" ambition (doing things for their own sake, not for the sake of how others v…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 11:18 PM
4

The problem is they are creating it in the wrong currency and for the wrong market. They are trying to use pesos while in New York. It could still technically work, but you better have a lot of fucking pesos. Better to simply use dollars. This is the rebuttal to the many people speaking of Tesla's legacy ITT. Yes, Tesla has a legacy that is maybe comparable to Edison's, despite having done way more than Edison for the world. Tesla didn't become a historic name because he was more beta, he did so…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 11:15 PM
11

Edison got some money. Tesla got immortality. That's only because Tesla was an absolute genius. If he had just been a very good engineer, noone would know his name.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/15 09:51 PM
7

In my personal opinion being gay and straight are made up concepts, a thirsty man will fuck whatever it wants. Actually, some studies find that homosexuals often have a more masculine 2D:4D ratio. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12573297 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11053694 "We report that (a) 2D:4D was lower in a sample of 88 homosexual men than in 88 sex- and age-matched controls recruited without regard to sexual orientation, (b) within the homosexual sample, there was a significant…
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 07:43 PM
8

Technically, this is a mental disease called Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy Of which 93% of cases are women
/r/TheRedPill18/08/15 07:26 PM
5

Because of gestation and rearing investments women can only have the R strategy (quality over quantity of partners and offspring) That's the K strategy. The r strategy is low investment, high quantity. The K strategy is high investment, low quantity. Additionally, it would be incorrect to characterize men as "r selected" in general; it's true for sexual strategy, but not for other attributes. For example, men have longer development times than women.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 09:36 AM
32

Reddit gold does a pretty good job So does feminism
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 09:30 AM
107

The best lie is the one you believe yourself
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 09:28 AM
3

Any rational thinker would cut through this bullshit in a minute. The majority of the backlash against feminism/SJW-ism doesn't have its roots in rational thinking. And that's why it's working so well. The average person isn't very smart, and has a lot of trouble being logically consistent. They let emotional biases and socially accepted conventions cloud their reasoning. That's why this entire mess exists to begin with. However, you can count on the average person to act in their own perceived …
/r/TheRedPill16/08/15 05:47 AM
1

It's true. Whether it's "beta" depends on the context in which it's used.
/r/askTRP16/08/15 05:42 AM
5

And yet ironically, marriage without a prenup is considered to be totally fair and reasonable on men. Marriage used to be a prenup for sex. Now it's more of an offensive move, and the actual prenup is the only defense there is, other than not marrying.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/15 09:43 PM
3

Imagine never experiencing hunger, and always being on the brink of satiety. Would you ever want to eat a sloppy burger? Probably not.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 04:11 AM
3

It's extremely hard to compare "which is harder, man or women" because our lives are different and our personalities are different. A man in a woman's body will have a much, much, much easier life than a woman in a man's body. Women have it easier because people like them, men have it easier because they have stronger personalities.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 04:06 AM
18

I remember a feminist study that sought to find whether or not women faced harsher punishments for their crimes. What they in fact found out was that women face much lighter sentences for their crimes, and are much less likely to be convicted of crimes in the first place, even for crimes that are equal across genders (such as smoking weed) The gender bias in the justice system far outweighs the racial bias. White men get arrested more than black women. You can bet that if this trend had even an …
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 04:05 AM
8

"But you don't HAVE a vagina! You're a MAN!" Stop oppressing me you cisgendered fuhrer of feces
/r/TheRedPill13/08/15 04:01 AM
6

Even then there is an expectation of some sort of "thank you". When children grow up, they're obligated to thank their parents, not vice versa.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 10:18 PM
5

Why not both? I haven't had too many problems with black dudes. Black women, on the other hand...
/r/MGTOW11/08/15 09:17 AM
1

They're not thinking with their dicks, they're thinking with neoteny.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 05:35 AM
2

I wonder if that leads to a happier relationship. It would be an inadvertent form of natural dread.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 05:18 AM
-2

No, we don't know this at all. Sure, it makes logical sense, but what is the actual outcome? If fewer men in promiscuous environments are reproducing then the above statement is untrue. By "beneficial for men", I meant "beneficial for any given man", not the collective of men. It is absolutely beneficial to an individual man to be promiscuous, as it results in more offspring. Single motherhood is a possibility, but there is probably a point where it is more optimal to bang strange chicks than to…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 11:25 AM
-2

And if the mother finds a father for your children?
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 11:19 AM
2

Most ads on TV operate on emotional reasoning. It's just much easier to arouse strong emotion in a short time than to actually make a reasoned argument, PLUS people are more likely to go with the cognitively lazy option of watching a few images than actually understanding an argument. I'm also going guess that emotional stimuli "stick" more easily. It's a triple win.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 08:14 AM
0

That wasn't a mistake, I mentioned that in the post.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 07:51 AM
-3

It's all about the odds. Firstborn son to a single mom has a somewhat shitty chance Gay son born to your wife has a 0% chance A second son probably has a pretty good chance, but a fifth son? There's a point where optimization favors promiscuity. Even rats display "sexual boredom" when fucking the same female for too long. They start having more sex, with greater vigor and frequency, when the old female is replaced by a new one.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 07:49 AM
1

Committing to your children is part of committing to yourself. They're half you.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 07:39 AM
1

You are a biological organism, a member of the animal kingdom. Literally your only reason for existing is to reproduce. Thats it. Sounds like you need turbo-redpill: Humans will go extinct sometime within the the next few billion years (though probably a lot earlier, the way things are going) The only reason for existing is to enjoy existence. Some enjoy existence in a refined, advanced way, and some enjoy it in a base, primitive way. But enjoyment is the reason for existing, as it is a mathemat…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 07:33 AM
0

Why would you even watch the rest of it if you didn't like it? Not faulting you for your opinion, I didn't like it either. I just can't understand why you'd watch something you had no interest in. Sounds feminine.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 07:27 AM
2

She was of course fucked up in her own way, dad was who knows where. ETD When women grow up without fathers, they enter puberty earlier, independent of other factors like race and income. We also know from biology that a longer maturation time = a more "capable" person, so you can put two and two together on that one.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 07:26 AM
3

but it won't work usually if she's a calloused person who gets her satisfaction from other women's envy This describes women in general, perhaps even all women. Women are far more likely to be interested in a man if she knows that other women express interest in him.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/15 10:44 AM
1

Reading xoJane is enough to convince any man that a huge portion of women are literally incapable of logical reasoning.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 06:52 PM
105

Analyze this article, and you'll see "Women are Wonderful" throughout the entire thing. The whole narrative is about how Tinder devalues women, and women are complaining how they aren't "treated like priorities". There's absolutely zero mention of the hordes of beta/unattractive men out there. Women are always the victim.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 03:23 AM
27

All other men are given the choice of "commitment or get the fuck out" At least until the girl in question hits 28.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 03:15 AM
96

Everything bad hits black people first, and then white people, as a general rule for America.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/15 03:12 AM
1

And I don't blame them one bit. It's a company. It was inevitable that they were going to start working on making it profitable or the investors would pull out and this place would close. This is how everything in human society works. high quality, weak profit/power, sparsely populated/sparsely selling --> word of mouth --> mass popularity and quality degeneration, high profit/power, original character of thing is lost It holds for products, companies, the restaurant down the street, nations, et…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 07:37 AM
29

Men are not objectively ugly, nor are women inherently attractive. I should have used more specific terminology. Women are more physically neotenous than men. They have rounder faces, lighter pigmentation, flatter foreheads, etc. We instinctively feel protective of things with neotenous physical features; women, puppies, kittens, children, etc. Nobody really thinks twice about eating chicken, but they'll lose their shit at killing baby chicks. That female attractiveness is valued more highly and…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 10:59 PM
7

they are surrounded by guys who will tell them they are special, because they wish to insert their penis into them. Incorrect reasoning. Guys overinflate praise for women because women are physically neotenous. Children are the standard by which neoteny is defined, and adults do to children exactly what men do to women. Yet, adults don't want to fuck children (most of them, anyway)
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 10:55 PM
10

How dare you steal their victim status from them! That makes them feel bad That's not the only reason. Men are uglier than women, so people feel less sympathy toward them.
/r/TheRedPill02/08/15 10:45 PM
0

My mother had me at 43. Her mother had her at 52 (!) during WW2. A lot of it is genetics, some women enter menopause earlier. However, I would also suspect that the women of today have a shorter fertile period than the women of yesteryear. There's plenty of evidence of people maturing faster and aging faster today than in the past. I would not be surprised if women entered menopause earlier today as well.
/r/RedPillWomen29/07/15 02:34 AM
1

It's rather un-PC to talk about because females experience rapid deterioration of fertility and healthfulness of gametes, while males don't.
/r/RedPillWomen29/07/15 02:30 AM
1

Feminism is primarily the effect of physical neoteny, and the emotions that physical neoteny invokes. Women are more physically neotenous than men in many ways: Rounder faces, bigger eyes, shorter, less muscle mass, less sloping foreheads, softer facial features, lighter skin, lighter hair, lighter eyes. All these traits are more represented in children than in adults, and in women than in men. These traits invoke protective emotions in people. Women have these traits in spades, so men feel prot…
/r/askTRP28/07/15 02:14 AM
1

Yeah, substantive justice is more expensive because it takes more thought and deliberation, and it also opens you up to accusations of unfair rulings, since it's not as mechanistic and impartial as procedural. I don't think that this is entirely a modern problem. It may be more prevalent now, but if you look at what people did and said 100 years ago, their lines of reasoning weren't fundamentally different. People also have higher IQs today than they did 100 years ago, which should lead to more …
/r/askTRP28/07/15 02:03 AM
1

There is no "correct," just differing views. You have to give every side a voice, because there is no objectivity (ex: creationism vs evolution). Not true, every pundit on reddit will tell you that entertaining creationism is a waste of time (hey, a broken clock, etc.) This is just religion. Christianity is dead, so neo-liberalism is the new religion/opiate of the masses. Christians believe evolution isn't real. Liberals believe evolution isn't real when it comes to intelligence, sexuality and p…
/r/askTRP28/07/15 01:49 AM
2

Yeah, I understand what you're saying. "You need to drop 100k to get your degree, even though you're a 45 year old woman" In response to any sort of emotional stress: "They need to get the help they need and then move on with their lives" Statements like these are very mechanistic/systematic. Do X, and life will improve. Cognitive laziness Looking into the substance of anything takes mental work. It's easier to just say what's socially appropriate. Women do this with men; they're much more attra…
/r/askTRP28/07/15 01:44 AM
1

Not really. All but one of them encourage it and make jokes about it.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 12:45 AM
1

In the West, the price of pussy is rising while the quality of pussy steadily declines. Civilizational complexity necessitates inequality. At the same time, complex civilizations have more access to resources. Example: 2000's America is more complex and more unequal than 1700s America (slaves notwithstanding, because they were not considered citizens). However, the average 2000 American has more access to resources than the average 1700 American. This is true even with the resource of women, if …
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 11:50 PM
1

It's not neoteny itself that fades, it's youth that fades. Neoteny is the trait of carrying juvenile qualities into adulthood. If you're lactose tolerant until 40, and then become intolerant, you're neotenous (as far as that trait goes). The neoteny is still in your genes.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:52 PM
9

Feminism hurts everybody but superior men. Inferior men get no women Inferior women become single mothers or alpha widows Superior women have a slightly smaller pool of men to choose from
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:49 PM
22

It's the hypocrisy that makes people mad. Men aren't mad that women have it easier and are given an unfair advantage in nearly every facet of life. Men are mad that despite these advantages, people still want women to have more.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:25 PM
5

Replace "woman" with "person", really
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:23 PM
11

It treats them like children while simultaneously brainwashing them into thinking they are as just capable or even better than men. Feminism doesn't treat women like children, people treat women like children. This is because they're physically neotenous. Google "women are wonderful" Feminism is just a logical extension of male emotion. It wasn't "designed" from the ground up, but rather uses already inherent phenomena to get something wanted. Kind of like a gravity slingshot around Jupiter.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:21 PM
2

Women don't give one fuck that tons of men die every year for nothing. "Women are wonderful" Men < Women < Children < Puppies
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:18 PM
12

Those men were also Asian, lol. And that half Asian dude was also extremely racist towards minorities. The amount of willful ignorance regarding that case was so thick you could cut it with a knife.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:15 PM
25

A high partner count isn't disgusting (within reason), it just instantly disqualifies you from being anything other than a fuckbuddy. Honestly, it's pretty gross to think about, and the risk of STDs goes up dramatically. If the average girl has a 20% chance of being positive for herpes, what chance does a 25+ y.o. girl with 20+ sexual partners taking birth control have? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epidemiology_of_herpes_simplex#United_States Also keep in mind that those stats are from almost a…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:12 PM
12

Abandon all hope, but taketh all herp
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 06:07 PM
7

It's an amusing bit of irony that the appearance of these kinds of women also signifies the beginning of the end for the society in question. Every functional thing needs a balance of stress. Too much is obviously bad, but too little is just as bad.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 03:54 PM
5

its other peoples fault, those evil culture peoples It's always someone else's fault. "Society" is to blame for everything
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 03:52 PM
1

Nah, it's more like: Woman vs. man, woman is competition, man is not. Therefore side against woman. If it's a divorce proceeding, then woman winning means that a female competitor won, and there's one less provider on the market for other women. Basically the same phenomenon as "slut shaming". With feminism, you get a lot of women vocally espousing it because it's socially acceptable. Being on a jury isn't subject to social scrutiny. Women hate other women in secret.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 09:24 AM
0

Right. I know 16 year old girls who have bigger breasts and hips than my first girlfriend did at the age of 22. How old are you? People have been biologically developing at earlier and earlier ages. A 13 year old today might be equivalent to a 15 year old 20 years ago. Of course, 16 years isn't anything anomalous, but I find women today tend to look different from women of the 1970s/80s. Namely by having more hip/butt mass (even if not fat), and being less svelte looking.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 08:57 AM
1

I met a girl last night. 21, cute face, thick bottom. Gonna be honest here, thick bottoms just spell out "pump and dump" for me.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 08:11 AM
2

Difference is that women do it more, because daddy is more forgiving of his little baby girl, and because there are endless swarms of betas begging to pay her bills and debts in exchange for motionless sex once in two months
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 08:09 AM
1

Today you need a college degree and a 3.0+ GPA to work for no pay
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 08:03 AM
1

topping it off by sending our all-volunteer soldiers to their deaths to fight terror itself. I think you meant "to fight for terror itself"
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 08:02 AM
3

In the old days, people had shorter cultural childhoods, but longer biological childhoods. Kids may have learned responsibility at a very early age, but the onset of puberty came at a later age.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 07:54 AM
1

I suspect the tenants of trp will permeate society within the next decade. Didn't know we were renting this place out.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 07:31 AM
-11

Like all red pilled women, she sort of gets it, but not really.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/15 07:13 AM
2

I'm not arguing that whites are inherently superior. I'm arguing the similarity of the hypocrisy. Women are attracted to the most powerful males, yet they hate their own inferiority to these males. Minorities are attracted to white people stuff, yet they hate their own inferiority to white people.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 07:20 PM
5

The Cleveland Show did pretty badly, but I still love that one quote: "Daddy, why is my sister's virginity so important?" "Well, son, if I told you that you could have a brand new soda pop, or one that's had 10 penises in it, which would you prefer?"
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 07:15 PM
-1

When a woman is with a beta, she isn't turned on. Women don't have fantasies of dating down, or of femdom.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 07:12 PM
1

It can be the same way for guys, if we're smart. In my youth, I messed around with girls that I would never have kept around for an LTR let alone marriage. Why? Because they were nuts and that translates into great sex. Incorrect. You slept around with women whom you didn't want for LTRs. Women sleep around with men who they want for LTRs, but can't manage to obtain. Any narrative that frames women as not wanting to LTR the guys they sleep around with is just a case of fox and grapes.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 07:10 PM
1

when I was younger and extremely bluepilled How young? Teenage girls are some of the easiest lays (at least they were a few years ago, prior to the extreme popularity of social media/online dating).
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 07:07 PM
4

Chinese pussy is made of the same bits as American pussy. Not exactly. The three main races have different levels of sexual development. Blacks are the most sexually developed, Asians the least, whites in the middle. This is pretty clear just from looking at physical data (dick size, musculature, hip size/butt size/WHR for women), but also from cultural trends. Just compare the black fascination with twerking and hip rolling to the Japanese fascination with skinny twigs in flattering dresses. Or…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 07:02 PM
0

Chimps do NOT have less competition for females, lol.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 06:57 PM
0

Ironically, the women that men are most sexually attracted to are not the most fit specimens, in terms of today's environment. Lots of men are innately attracted to big butts, hips, tiny waists. Racially speaking, Africans, who have the most sexualized features (big butt/tiny waist, big dick/easy muscle growth) undergo earlier puberty than whites. Asians, who have the least sexualized features (flat butt/flat tits, small dick/less apparent muscles) undergo puberty later than whites. In nature, a…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 06:51 PM
6

Patriarchy has always existed and will never end. It is centered around the oppression of men by powerful men. Feminism compares all women with only the top 10% of men. It ignores the bottom 10%, or even anything within the bottom 90%. Feminists face a problem: while they consciously know that it's bad that women aren't as powerful as the top 10%, they're also irresistibly attracted to the top 10%. It's akin to minorities complaining about white racism, even though they move to white countries, …
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 07:03 AM
2

Whenever I see a CC rider, they always look physically worn down, as if they've aged 10 years more than their peers. I used to chalk it up to the hormonal effects of always being rejected from long term relationships, as well as general genetic predisposition (meaning that girls predisposed to ride the CC are also predisposed to age badly, as both are unfit traits). Now I also wonder how much of that is due to STDs. Women are far more likely than men to contract them, due to the plain physics of…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 06:46 AM
6

THe house cameras are a must, but due to some laws you may not be able to use the audio recording or even the car recording (unless you've told them before hand you are recording them) I don't understand this. Are you allowed to get away with shoplifting if you "didn't know you were being recorded"?
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 06:34 AM
11

Yeah, it's a very cringeworthy trend. It's considered perfectly acceptable to publicly shame people for their artwork. In this case it seems like it could have been an honest question, but plenty of artists catch flak for not having enough women/non-whites in certain roles. It's fucking stupid. If you don't like something, then don't watch it.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 06:25 AM
-1

Not at all. Better example than the west, no doubt, but definitely not Saudi Arabia.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 05:18 AM
-11

Another case of mismatch between modern and primitive man. Back in the depths of human evolution, you had to be an alpha in order to "rape" a woman, so "rape" was usually enjoyable for the woman. You can see this with other animals, too. During mating season, a lesser bison can't rape females. The strong alpha bison maintain physical force over them. Females naturally submit to those who are superior. In the animal kingdom, females are ordinarily protected by alpha males, who maintain their domi…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/15 03:28 AM
0

White women are the cutest and nearly the most physically neotenous group in the world, on average (maybe some northern Asian women beat them slightly in facial features, but white women make up for it in pigmentation). They don't even need to claim to be victimized for white knights to want to help them.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 03:39 AM
2

They don't really give two shits about real oppressed women, like the ones in the middle east who might get acid thrown on their faces for being out of line... At least not enough to do a damn things about it. As if women in the middle east are even particularly oppressed to begin with. That place is terrible for the average male, you run getting your hands chopped off for minor offenses, rampant censorship, legalized polygamy, and extreme income inequality. Since it's a theocracy, tax laws deri…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 03:30 AM
3

I don't. Children shouldn't be expected to know better.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 03:22 AM
-1

Women are neotenous looking, so we aren't threatened by them.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 03:19 AM
1

It does work both ways and, yes, I too enjoy sexual carte blanche. I just don’t use mine as much as my wife uses hers. What’s important is equality of opportunity, not outcome. Except for when the outcome is disfavorable to women.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/15 03:17 AM
2

Almost definitely not. What you may start to see is acts of violence against people who pull stuff like this.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/15 04:50 AM
1

My guess is that it's an older person. Old people are just set in their ways, and really don't properly understand today's world.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 12:17 PM
0

Deadly animals (outside of things that kill you with brute force) are pretty much nonexistent in cold climates. All the most venomous/poisonous animals live by the equator, and arctic climates have literally zero of them.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 10:21 AM
123

Just going to repeat this because it's important: Women are treated like children. We inherently like women, want to care for them, and don't expect them to take responsibility for anything. Women physically resemble children. Women have fuller lips, bigger eyes, rounder faces, flatter foreheads, less pronounced nasal bridges, lighter skin/hair/eyes, and more subcutaneous body fat. The retention of infantile traits is called neoteny. Women are physically neotenous. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 10:16 AM
6

Diet, pesticides, various disruptive chemicals, having children at later ages, etc.
/r/askTRP16/07/15 02:37 AM
7

Testosterone levels. They're lower today than 10 years ago, and lower then than 10 years before that.
/r/askTRP16/07/15 12:48 AM
0

I actually saw the opposite, but I have an extremely deep voice to begin with. It wasn't that my voice got super high, but just that it became normal sounding.
/r/askTRP16/07/15 12:47 AM
19

"The feminine imperative" You mean physical neoteny. Women physically resemble children/babies more than men do. Therefore we innately feel protection and sympathy over them. We also feel these emotions toward children. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 08:50 PM
2

Your desire to fuck the opposite gender goes back way, way further than any Homo branch. It goes back further than vertebrates. And the dynamic of cheap sperm, expensive egg has existed for 1/3 of the earth's lifespan. All sexually reproducing organisms share that common ancestor.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 07:36 AM
5

Fittingly, that's about the age at which a child can take moderate care of themselves, without needing to be babied for every little thing.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 07:31 AM
5

r/K theory goes very deep. It starts out as a simple study of reproductive strategy, but once you really start looking into it, it's amazing. My theory is that having K genetics gives you a lower adrenaline response, and a calmer demeanor. This is supported by both wasps and birds, the K selected ones are reputed to be extremely non-aggressive and tame (often to the point of being easy prey for humans, like the dodo). r genetics tend to be due to being prey, so it makes sense that you would be s…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 07:29 AM
2

This is the girl who wrote that article: https://heartiste.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/looker.jpg?w=771&h=521 Should tell you all you need to know, really
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 06:11 AM
10

She sounds like a somewhat redpilled woman (no, not the types on the RPW sub). She's a woman who subscribes to the feminist schtick, while also acknowledging the meat market economics of sex. This is why she sleeps around a lot. However, one thing that is inescapable for women is that they are the party to be conquered. When a man fucks a woman, he wins, not her. However, if the man gives her provisioning, attention, care, etc., it evens out. She puts up a front, but she's not immune to it, and …
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 04:24 AM
1

People think the red pill is that life is miserable, dark, and pissy That's exactly what the red pill is, for most people, because they've been indoctrinated into a first world disneyfied existence for 18 years of their life.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/15 02:56 AM
8

It won't change anything at all. Number of homosexuals is a tiny minority. Number of homosexuals who want to get married is a tiny minority OF that minority Number of lesbians is a minority of homosexuals. This problem affects maybe 0.05% of women.
/r/MGTOW15/07/15 01:25 AM
10

There's something interesting here. As a general rule, far left types tend to be just as sexist/racist as far right types, with the only difference being that they feel it necessary to "fix" the supposed "problem". Leftists agree 100% with white supremacists and male chauvinists that whites and males are superior to non-whites and females. Leftists just see this as something that needs to be "fixed", using government intervention. Rightists see this as something that should be left alone.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/15 05:16 AM
1

Not sure what you're talking about.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 08:02 AM
2

It's not the result of feminism, it's the result of innate sympathy for females. Feminism is also the result of innate sympathy for females. This sympathy exists because women look more neotenous, much like children. People also have innate sympathy for children. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect I saw a video recently of a guy trying to break up a rape. This wasn't a human rape--it was a group of male ducks trying to fuck a female duck. The guy kept chasi…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:52 AM
2

no one listens to issues regarding men unless they can be spun as actually being damaging to women... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect This problem will never go away. Trying to get people to sympathize equally along gender lines is like trying to elicit the same emotional response across age lines. 3 year olds are cuter than 30 year olds, and women are cuter than men. They've literally evolved to elicit powerful caretaker emotions in us.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:40 AM
8

Women want an active man, while men are fine with a passive woman. This (ignoring all other factors) would make a male sexbot much harder to create.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:31 AM
3

No robot will be anywhere near as good as a real woman. Not for many years yet. I think VR takes care of that. Fixes the uncanny valley problem, drives down costs (much more software than hardware), and provides limitless potential, customizability and variability.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:26 AM
1

Things like this and VR are not comparable to videogames. Even if they were, why would it make a difference? Video gaming is a multi-billion dollar industry which largely replaces more traditional recreational activities like sports and card/board games. Millions of men opt for video games, to the relative exclusion of traditional games, and traditional games aren't even that hard to play or find groups to play with. Now compare how hard it is to find a girlfriend with how hard it is to join a b…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:22 AM
1

Confidence can be intrinsically or extrinsically derived. Women get a lot of the latter (social validation), men get the former (testosterone). If you're trying to come up with something new, and you inevitably hear dozens of people telling you it's a waste of time, you will believe what they say if you derive your confidence from your environment, rather than from within yourself.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:13 AM
1

If your average man had as much self confidence as your average women, nearly all men would be alphas lol No they wouldn't, they would be desperately overcompensating losers. Women aren't self confident, but many of them try to outwardly appear self confident. The one exception would be in the realm of dating, where women are about 100x more adept than men, so the sheer mathematics necessitates that they be self confident.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 07:06 AM
2

I was agreeing with you, dumbass.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 11:00 AM
2

Everyone suddenly cares about semantics once leftists are mentioned, but nobody bats an eye at "anti-semitic" or "American Indian".
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 10:39 AM
1

I honestly think there is a greater chance that Islam gets gutted by feminism than being conquered by the US military. Makes sense, especially since the US is allies with the birthplace of Islam
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 10:36 AM
2

Blonde hair is common in northern Europe. It's like sex, it's not a big deal unless you don't have it.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 08:53 AM
1

Even funnier is when you see various non-white girls (usually black) wearing colored contacts, completely unaware of the telltale uncoupling of the lens' border from the boundary of the pupil, resulting in this
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 08:51 AM
1

hair color tends to correlate with other traits, including general facial features.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 08:09 AM
3

That woman looks so obviously non-blonde that it's almost comical. Her skin tone and features clash terribly with her hair color.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 08:08 AM
1

It's also a good indicator of r selection, which is pretty much fidelity. Darker haired/eyed people have faster reflexes and more masculine facial features, while blonde/blue people have slower ones and more infantilized faces. This is intraracial (holds within white people), but I would be surprised if it didn't hold for all racial groups.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 08:06 AM
1

The way I see it, red = sex, blonde = princess, brunette = plain. There was even some study about women dying their hair red when they cheat.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/15 08:02 AM
28

Over time the village with mostly women and 3 men would be more successful than the village with only 3 women. Nope. The village with mostly women would be conquered by the village with mostly men.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 10:13 PM
35

Women like doing things that are "approved" by others. Just like with men, inanimate objects and habits also need social desirability. This is why they get great grades, but ultimately flounder in the job market, and are virtually nonexistent in innovation. Innovation needs inherent interest, high intelligence, high self confidence, and a total lack of concern for others' approval. Women are highly deficient in all these traits.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 10:09 PM
23

Not surprising. Women are literally afraid of doing new things.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 08:45 PM
18

She looks pretty fat in that pic.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 07:40 PM
73

Eventually you're going to have to ask at smaller and smaller intervals of sex. As the duration of the interval approaches zero, this becomes known as Integral Intercourse.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/15 12:57 AM
4

just for being alive Just for having existed* Lack of deceasedness is optional.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 12:18 PM
2

don't next
/r/askTRP06/07/15 05:31 AM
1

Absolutely correct. "but oh my god, 18 year old girls are so annoying!!!1" Have you ever spent more than 10 minutes with the average 25 year old woman?
/r/TheRedPill06/07/15 05:27 AM
3

There's a comment graveyard at the bottom, I wish the archive had it. Those usually have some of the most telling information.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/15 08:25 PM
1

Financial value = social value Financial cost = effort needed and genetic "skill" When financial value is perceived as exceeding financial cost (like in a sale), woman wants, because she operates on value, not inherent desire. This is why women own so many shoes, because it's easy to create perceived savings for many pairs of shoes, but the woman gets no inherent satisfaction from wearing the shoes. When social value of a man exceeds effort/genetic beauty needed to get that man, woman wants him,…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 05:54 AM
-2

This technically isn't dread game, it's social proof. Dread game is about giving the illusion of having social proof.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 05:47 AM
2

Not alphas, just fewer betas. When most men can get a woman, and premarital sex is heavily discouraged, there are fewer betas.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 04:43 AM
1

Where is the evidence for this fairy tale? T levels? Men in the past had much higher T levels, and testosterone is highly associated with self confidence and contentness.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 04:40 AM
13

rule 1: be unmarried rule 2: don't be not unmarried
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 04:30 AM
6

In every conflict situation in human life, there is a spectrum of terribleness and goodness. An individual will generally be pacified if he experiences enough goodness to offset the badness. This is one of the reasons redpill thinking is more popular now than ever before. Society got too greedy, and a larger proportion of men are experiencing proportionally too much badness. If they had just let him walk her down the aisle, they would've gotten everything. But they had to test their luck that ti…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/15 04:26 AM
6

Also consider that people today reach puberty earlier and biologically mature faster than people of the past. So a 23 year old today is less fertile than a 23 year old in 1970.
/r/MGTOW29/06/15 02:20 AM
1

As far as respecting women goes (lol), I find that I respect women more when they look less sexual. A girl with a big ass/hips gets my dick wet, because she looks like a good pump-n-dump. A slender and more modest looking girl doesn't get me hard as easily, but also makes me view her as more of an individual person, and less of a sexual object/slave.
/r/MGTOW29/06/15 01:14 AM
8

What if we don't need mass amounts of betas because of technology and automation? Would we be better off as a species if babies are only being made by the top 20% of men? Betas are the ones who create and maintain technology and automation, so I see this as a bit of a moot point. Automation is threatening to the financially and intellectually inferior, not the sexually inferior.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 12:16 AM
4

Calhoun's rat experiment. We aren't meant to stay civilized, all of this is temporary.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 12:11 AM
2

I thought it was both, depending on how it's used. "Google produces a myriad of products and services" "Google produces myriad products and services" I'm pretty sure both are grammatically correct
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 12:10 AM
17

I knew another Jewish chick from a single mother home who wore Harvard shirts to school nearly every day of senior year. Everyone knew she wasn't too smart, and that she wasn't going to get in. She ended up not getting into any ivies or even near-ivies, never underestimate the power of the hamster.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 12:06 AM
31

I doubt we have anywhere near that amount of time. Modern technology/media accelerates everything a hundredfold.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 12:03 AM
6

rape, misogynist, sexist "rapist", "misogynist", and "sexist" basically mean the same thing already
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 12:01 AM
16

or what time period you're talking about
/r/TheRedPill29/06/15 12:00 AM
-1

If you've ever been around even a small amount of Indian people, you'll notice that they're mostly on par with, if not much worse than white people as far as aging goes. The "melanin" argument for aging always sounded like bullshit for two reasons: Indians tend to age like crap, and light skinned northeast Asians tend to age very well.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/15 02:49 AM
18

Gaming was relatively nerdy until recently. http://i.imgur.com/I6uRGlb.jpg
/r/TheRedPill28/06/15 02:17 AM
11

They use that to skew the numbers in their favor. Same thing in academia. No spatial questions on the SAT, that's sexist.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/15 02:12 AM
0

Everything about female desire, whether it's sexual desire or recreational interest, is primarily extrinsically and socially influenced.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/15 02:09 AM
1

Tan skin looks healthy, provides protection from the skin, and ages slower. This is hilariously wrong, considering the only racial group which seems to age even worse than white people is Indian people. The lack of aging that blacks and Asians have doesn't seem primarily melanin related.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 07:04 PM
6

So you're saying that someone who lives in northern Iceland is necessarily more attractive than a person who lives in Southern California On average, yes. Icelanders are nearly all white, and are generally quite tall. As for the issue of lighter pigment being more attractive, you should check out the infamous "doll studies". Children of all different races/colors from all different countries find light skinned dolls the cutest, and even ascribe other positive traits to them, such as intelligence…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 05:49 AM
4

I think white people have a higher incidence of attractive features, although there are obviously objectively attractive people present in every race. In addition, white people have the most attractive pigment. Everyone likes lighter features, and all societies displayed this preference even before European colonialism. Globalization is essentially Americanization, and women's sexuality is far more dependent on social trends than men's.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 05:19 AM
12

White people are attractive, women are attractive, and the dating market is more anti-male than ever before. This means that men in general have to loosen their standards by necessity, and will fuck down much more often than usual. There's also the social status issue, since American media (which is mostly white) has essentially become global media, white men (and to a lesser extent black men) should be even more desired than usual.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 04:23 AM
3

Although now, it's gotten to the point, you are either going to be MGTOW or PUA, and spin plates and treat women like the trash that they are. Unfortunately, it'll be a long time before that becomes the case. The third option is grovelling and getting intermittent pity sex, and then wifing up a whore. And that's what most men do.
/r/MGTOW26/06/15 03:26 AM
1

You are not understanding my point. The most desirable men will date the most desirable women. Tell me, if you had your pick of any woman on earth, who would you rather give your long term commitment to? A white girl or an Asian girl?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 03:22 AM
7

White guy who dates white women = alpha White guy who exclusively dates asians = creep who isn't good enough to get white girls, so maybe I shouldn't date this dude
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 12:41 AM
0

Yellow fever throws it in their face that the only reason they got this guy is physical appearance. They don't want to believe that. It's more of the opposite, if anything. Guys who aren't good enough to get white girls can often get Asian girls. A girl wants a man who is attractive to other women, particularly the most valuable women. And the most valuable women are attractive white women. So when an Asian girl sees that a guy only or primarily dates other Asian women, an alarm bell goes off in…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 12:38 AM
2

He said dating, not banging
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 12:25 AM
0

A lot of Asian women are creeped out by guys who don't date white girls. The reason for this is essentially preselection. Women like men when they see that other women want them. Women like men even more when they see that attractive women want them. Women like men even more when they see that white women want them. White is superior and attractive, so if a man is able to land white women, he is of high value. If he isn't landing white women, he is suspect. I should reiterate that this is probab…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 12:22 AM
0

What's wrong with the formatting?
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 12:03 AM
1

Education is a huge factor in this, and they mention that boys do significantly worse at schooling than girls and the author believes it is a systemic problem in the effort to teach boys. I think it's a biological "problem". White boys do significantly worse than white girls in school. Black boys do a LOT worse than black girls in school. Asian boys don't do worse than Asian girls in school. We are seeing the classic blackwhiteasian trend again. Incidentally, this could also explain a lot of his…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/15 12:01 AM
1

There's a tendency to play down the importance of facial attractiveness because for many that would mean admitting inferiority That has nothing to do with it at all. If that were the case, then people would also pretend that women didn't care about height. But we don't. Facial attractiveness matters, but from what I've seen, height and social status matter more.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 11:38 PM
1

Good looking people also have higher IQs on average, independent of other factors.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 11:35 PM
3

It's amazing that a hack website like psychologytoday would even acknowledge this. However, they went back to full moron-mode when they started talking about women not showing their desire for men due to "gender norms". Women don't show their desire for men because women don't have an intrinsic desire for men. They have an intrinsic desire for status, which is pursued vicariously through men, among other avenues (clothes, fashion, trends, music, etc)
/r/MGTOW25/06/15 10:59 PM
-2

I prefer to use Shell gasoline. However, if my car is running on empty and the nearest Shell station is nowhere in sight, I will settle on Citgo or Exxon gas. The problem with this analogy is that gasoline's performance is objective. You may prefer one brand for whatever reason, but assuming the quality is the same, they both do the job (powering your car) identically. Your car's engine doesn't discriminate. Meanwhile the performance of a sexual mate is completely based on the preferences that y…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 11:05 PM
-2

Not true. Women today have 11 different methods of birth control to ensure they don't get pregnant We have access to essentially infinite calories, but our metabolisms don't magically ramp up to compensate. It doesn't matter what types of birth control there are. Evolution is evolution, and women like the exact same (broadly defined) traits today that they liked 50,000 years ago, and will continue to like 50,000 years from now.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:58 PM
-1

Social status matters much more than physical beauty for a man.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:55 PM
2

It's powerful men who are allowing and funding feminism, (think about that) for their own agenda. Men are competitive. Biology necessitates that men occupy the most superior and the most inferior positions simultaneously.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:42 PM
27

The sexual marketplace as a concept is so fucking solid that at times it's scary how accurate it is. That's because it's existed, in some form, for at least 25% of the earth's history. The "sexual marketplace" can be simplified down to three major points: 1) Genetic diversity improves survivability. Therefore, sexual reproduction is superior. 2) Division of labor is always more efficient. Therefore, "sperm" and "egg" instead of isogametes are superior. 3) Animals are mobile. Therefore, males evo…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:31 PM
-1

See, dick for women is what economists would call a fungible good. This is not true. Fungibility of an item means that two separate instances of that item are interchangeable for the purposes they're used for. Money is fungible, because one $10 bill is perfectly equal to another $10 bill for the purposes people want a $10 bill for. However, no two humans look the same, except for twins (and even then, most twins show a significant difference in appearance). Theoretically, there could be several …
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 10:29 PM
1

The world was forged by men who were trying to get paid. No one does shit for free. While this is definitely true, there was definitely more "charity" 200 years ago, because people lived in small communities, had closer social connections with those around them, were racially homogeneous, and didn't have the level of female cattiness of today.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 02:14 PM
3

She's actually deflected responsibility three times by the time she writes that line
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:55 AM
5

She gets her alpha cock and then gets to play the victim and soak up gallons of sympathy and validation after. She wanted emotional validation from the alpha cock. She couldn't get it, so she settles for validation from reddit.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:48 AM
4

Women don't want to be treated like inanimate sex toys. Luckily, that's not what OP is suggesting. Women like being mistreated. Women also like being treated well. Too heavy on the former and you're a jerk/asshole, too heavy on the latter and you're a niceguyTM. There's an experiment that found that puppies show the most emotional attachment to people who combine both strong positive and negative stimuli. These puppies' attachment to the human was stronger than puppies who only received positive…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:46 AM
-1

Women don't particularly enjoy sex most of the time. What they do enjoy is the validation of sex, as a proxy of her desirability. And the more desirable the man who desires her is, the stronger that validation is.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:43 AM
0

Girls like being mistreated. Sorry, I can't even put a politically correct spin on this if I tried. Girls enjoy being mistreated. This is the crux of femininity. Women unconsciously enjoy feeling inferior. However, this is contradictory to the conscious mind's motive, which is that being inferior is bad, and one must be equal/superior to others. This results in a lot of mental instability in women, and is responsible for the never-ending rationalizations women have for their own weakness. What f…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 05:39 AM
2

So what does this mean? It means that if you are in a relationship with a pretty young woman today, its a bit like being in a relationship with a famous actress of the 1950s It's far worse than that, the girl doesn't even need to be pretty. Be a 3/10 girl, and have (or feign) interest in some traditionally male activities, and your received attention quotient will skyrocket.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:55 PM
10

Quote marks because it just doesn't seem right to use "hamstering" as a normal word in it's own right--kind of like "selfie" I've seen regular reference to women with low partner counts as being suitable for LTRs.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 03:41 PM
5

Man, it freaks me out how fast stuff can spread on reddit. I started mentioning the "women are wonderful" thing back in March or April, maybe, and now it's popping up everywhere, even askHamsters. The reason I mention it so much is because I believe it is at the heart of everything about male-female interactions, and few people recognize it explicitly. The closest most people come is saying things like "that beta is just being nice to you because he wants to fuck you", which is untrue. The beta …
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 07:36 AM
6

Beta men in the 70s still believed that the Free Love mindset was equally and mutually beneficial for both sexes since it was supposedly based on a freedom from performance for themselves while freeing women from sexual repression Stupid men today still believe this. Men inherently want to believe the best of women, because they're women--physically neotenous, much like children, and arouse the same feelings of sympathy.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:47 AM
1

As I mentioned here in the beginning, a slowing of the maturation process was the inevitable result of women’s freedom of Hypergamous choice. A slowing of the social* maturation process. It is important to distinguish this, because we are physically maturing faster than before--reaching puberty at earlier ages, having shorter childhoods, and getting various age-associated diseases at earlier and earlier ages.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:44 AM
1

First impression is everything. People tend to perceive formerly fat people as fat, even upon losing weight, if they knew them closely while they were fat. This is both good and bad. If you fuck up, it lingers forever, but you can always start anew elsewhere.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:38 AM
2

Remember this next time you feel someone (woman or man) is being illogical. A lot of men hit themselves over the head trying to figure out the omnipresent logical contradictions in SJW and leftist (and no, I'm not fucking talking about "classical liberalism", so STFU already) dialogue. They all make sense when viewed through the lens of mirroring others' feelings.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:27 AM
54

I agree with this, and you often see a form of "hamstering" prevalent on TRP which attempts to ignore this. Many men here will refer to an LTR-suited girl as having a "low partner count". But it's not low partner count that matters; it's having a partner count, period. Everyone knows the graph of divorce rate with respect to number of wife's premarital sex partners. More premarital sex partners = higher chance of her divorcing. But take another another look and note where the biggest dropoffs ar…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:11 AM
2

I should have specified that I was talking about America in particular. I was also referring not only to financial ills, but biological/ecological ones. Today's Americans have higher rates of myopia, lower T, higher rates of hair loss and metabolic dysfunction, for a start. Pollinator populations (bees and butterflies) have fallen so drastically within the last decade that regular people are lamenting on how rare they are now.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 02:58 AM
2

Not much of a mentality if you ever plan on having a kid In my opinion, now is the worst time in recent history, if not all of human history, to have a kid. Unless you're already part of the financial top 0.1%, there is a very high chance that your descendants will essentially become slaves. There's tons of ecological dysfunction everywhere, and human health has been declining nontrivially (in ways other than obesity) for over half a century now. I don't see the generations born in the late 00s …
/r/TheRedPill21/06/15 12:26 AM
6

simply because her brain is not able to digest and process experiences like men Women show more activity in the amygdala when they process stimuli. The amygdala is the "emotional center" of the brain. Teenagers also show more amygdala activity than adults.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 11:49 PM
59

That line never gets old. Women, unfortunately, do
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 11:45 PM
0

I've posted about this before. Virgin males are objectively more fit (for their relative gender, since simply being female will make you more fit in an absolute sense) than sluts, because you can always sleep with more people, but you can't unsleep with the ones you've already slept with.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 11:44 PM
3

without contraception bearing the wrong mans child would result in abandonment and likely starvation of mother and child. No, this is not true for all humans. In tropical climates, gathering food was quite easy. In cold temperate climates, gathering food was pretty much impossible, and people depended much more on fishing/hunting. In sub saharan Africa, a woman could easily provide for herself and her child, regardless of the father's choice to commit. In Siberia, this is not true at all. This i…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 03:24 AM
1

Because she should be ashamed of herself I think when you start to enjoy getting dicked by guys, shame basically stops being an emotion
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 09:53 AM
29

I can't believe there are still male fools out there who get married. Are they even fucking sentient? Modern marriage is like modern college. The primary reason people do it is because other people do it, and 80% of the attemptees will be worse off after doing it.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/15 09:51 AM
7

"You look like a serial killer" - treats her like a man. Akin to calling her "creepy". In fact, you should do the same study with "You look pretty creepy", and see how that fares. Since she's being labeled a man, maybe she somewhat internalizes that, and leads to a higher response rate (like a man would have) "Men love women. Women love etc etc discuss" - You are engaging her with a discussion that involves thinking. This isn't appealing because it's not logical and not emotional, and it spells …
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 04:22 AM
6

put your pelmeni and smetana on dat plate.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 09:39 PM
5

So, what they want is an alpha who will also provide. No. Alpha and beta are two separate roles, and are thus fulfilled more effectively through division of labor. It is more effective to have a pure alpha and a pure beta than to have a mixed man. Furthermore, it is also easier to acquire separate men for the alpha and beta roles than it is to acquire one man to fulfill both roles. It's easy to get a hot guy to fuck you, and to get an unattractive man to orbit you/marry you. It is NOT EASY to ge…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 09:29 PM
-1

Men today tend to be manchildren. It's simply inevitable, and not only a product of our culture, but our lack of true economic hardship as well.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/15 07:14 AM
3

Europeans are not the most cold adapted peoples. It's tempting to think of the very light pigmentation as synonymous with cold weather, but in reality it is often a result of sexual and diet-constrained selection. A good example is the prevalence of blonde/red hair in black skinned Pacific peoples. They have high rates of blondism and rufism, but not light eyes, which makes complete sense. Hair is dead tissue, the color does not matter. The iris is functional, and less melanin means more UV reac…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 10:57 PM
1

This is the same reason subs like coontown stay up. Even though the content posted is actually more offensive, the popularity is so low that it doesn't matter. offensiveness * popularity = total offensiveness 2 years ago, this wasn't an issue for TRP, but it currently is. If there was another way to prevent FPH from appearing on /all the mods would gladly have implemented it, but by their account the admins refused to even talk with them about anything. Meaning that the admins just nuked the sit…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/15 08:59 PM
1

You completely misinterpreted my comment. The biological agents which cause masculine facial features also cause masculine mental features.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 01:14 AM
3

Why be burdened with acting like an adult when other adults still spoil you? The "environmental" hypothesis. Being pretty gets you attention, so there is no need to develop mental skills. I suspect that this accounts for relatively little of the difference. The brain has many androgen receptors. So does the face and body.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 10:23 PM
6

I've always thought MBTI was bullshit as far as the T/F part goes, because the relevant questions are asked in such a way that nearly anyone with any ego would end up with T. If you ask "do you think logically, or do you think based on your feelings?", nearly everyone would pick the former, regardless of what they actually do. Because you feel like a moron when you admit that you think based on your emotions.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 10:22 PM
5

Gee, it's almost as if masculinizing the mind also masculinizes the face and body.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 10:16 PM
7

in her soft-skills job The greatest skill a woman brings to her job is the skill of being nice to look at.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 10:12 PM
1

Logically, it's not worth it. Yes it is. Otherwise you don't have any offspring. Women being irrational has other roots.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 10:10 PM
1

Philosophy and related subjects require both curiosity and self-awareness Women have a severe lack of both of these traits
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 10:08 PM
1

lolwut. TRP is not emotional support. Venting, sure, but we don't coddle people and tell them that the world is fair.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 10:00 PM
3

Fox and the grapes. There was a bit on the OKCupid data studies that said that ugly women have lower response rates to attractive men than average looking women do.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 09:02 PM
3

That made me angry. First of all, unless you're a doctor shut the fuck up about diagnosing mental illness. Second of all, the guy came in saying he had shit self-esteem and their solution is to accuse him of being...self-absorbed? It's a rationalization. We hate weakness (except when it's complemented by feminine beauty), so we find an acceptable reason to hate. We may viscerally hate his weakness, but we consciously convince ourselves that he is not weak at all, but rather the opposite. This is…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 08:56 PM
15

Definitely, just check out the comments on any of the Christine McConnell threads. Comments (mainly from women) complaining that she's too perfect and making people uncomfortable, +1948 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 08:43 PM
15

Nah, his apology just made more people mad "I'm sorry that I got caught saying that, and I'm sorry you were offended. But I'm actually right, you know." I love it.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 05:38 PM
8

Men have slightly higher average intelligence. The gender gap on various test scores has been closing because of deliberate changes to make it that way. Men also have much higher standard deviation in intelligence. This means that there are going to be way more males with an IQ of 130+ than there are females. STEM majors also have much higher IQs than non-STEM majors, with the "hardest" sciences having the highest. Women also suffer from a spatial IQ disadvantage in addition to this, and spatial…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 05:35 PM
48

It's the feminized men that are the best to watch, though. All the feminine weakness with none of the pussypass. This is an extremely simple way to know which gender is superior in what aspects. A girl who shows male character traits is lauded even more than usual, and coveted by men. A boy who shows female character traits is annoying or disgusting to most people. Male character traits are objectively superior; women are valued despite their personalities, not because of them.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 05:30 PM
6

They do believe it, they just suppress their beliefs. A good quote by the Unabomber basically said how liberals unconsciously think that certain classes of people are objectively superior to others, while advocating in their favor. If anyone ever wants a good bit of reading, I'd highly suggest reading his writings. Everything he says is true, as far as I'm concerned. (inb4 FBI shows up at my residence)
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 04:29 AM
2

maximum security she's the security, numbskull
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 04:24 AM
3

Mucus production is also a very common response to dairy products, in the lactose tolerant. Many people have a reaction to galactose which causes them to develop mucus.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 01:27 AM
3

Well what about the eugenics What about it? Eugenics is a positive force for the human species, as far as I'm concerned. It won't ever take hold, mostly because dysgenics is far more desirable for those already at the top of the genetic heap.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 01:23 AM
2

most chicks can't do a single pullup, just sayin
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 01:22 AM
3

all you can eat sushi and high quality are pretty much mutually exclusive
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 09:44 PM
12

http://www.8asians.com/2012/01/25/do-asians-have-the-smallest-testicle/ Seems like testicle size follows the Asian-white-black trend, with blacks having the largest testes.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 06:28 AM
17

Society as a whole has been manipulated so strongly, by the feminine imperative, into believing it. Society as a whole has been manipulated by the cute faces and innocent eyes of girls into believing it. There's no higher level reasoning here, men just like women.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 05:45 AM
19

Also love how any comment that questions "women are wonderful" I've been plugging that phrase for a while now. NEVER saw it mentioned before I started, but I've seen it popping up everywhere now. Feels good to make a difference. Link for those unfamiliar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 02:57 AM
50

If human women didn't cheat so much, human men wouldn't have DEEZE NUTS. Chimp testicles are huge because chimps are promiscuous. Gorilla testicles are tiny because gorillas are less promiscuous. Human testicles are in between. And guess which ape we're more related to?
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 02:55 AM
0

It's because of the interactions of sexual value and racial value female > male white > non-white So a white male and a non white female make a good, equal match. White male and white female or nonwhite male and nonwhite female make bad matches (natural female "superiority") White female and nonwhite male make a terrible match
/r/MGTOW07/06/15 06:05 PM
2

He should have said social status. The confusion comes from the fact that social status = SMV for men, but not for women.
/r/MGTOW07/06/15 05:59 PM
2

I'm guessing you don't watch the olympics?
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 06:53 AM
2

height =/= body proportions, and height has increased significantly through non-genetic means in the last century. Europeans are descended in significant part from warm adapted peoples. South American natives are descended from cold adapted peoples who experienced warm environments for a relatively short time of their existence (<10,000 years). Polynesians have the same body types as northeast Asians, despite living in fairly hot climates. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen%27s_rule Incidentally…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 03:46 AM
0

Cold adapted people have shorter limbs and thicker bodies in order to conserve heat. Hot adapted people have longer limbs and thinner bodies to radiate heat. Africans are very hot adapted, Asians are very cold adapted. Europeans are in the middle, being descended from both hot and cold adapted populations. As for the snatch thing, I have no idea if it's true.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 11:37 PM
5

Yeah, collar bones are very easy to see, even on most fat people.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 09:23 PM
3

Black people have longer legs, and black women are known for....yeah. Asian people have longer torsos, and...yep.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 09:21 PM
2

What's up with the comment graveyard in this thread?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 11:17 PM
1

If you're not American, you really wouldn't get it. European leftists tend to be much more accepting of these things, from what I've seen. You haven't been exposed to how radically bipolar the political spectrum is, and how herd-like their opinions are on most issues.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 05:23 AM
1

More like a significant minority
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 12:59 AM
89

Exactly 17 dollars, I'm guessing. Now that's gangsta.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 12:52 AM
33

Organic local farmers with guns, you mean
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 12:51 AM
5

i think it looks horrible on 95+% of the people that try it, but a few do manage to pull it off. Anyone who actually intends to become trans should do so before puberty. Testosterone is irreversible and masculinizes the entire body. Estrogen closes the growth plates (probably does a shitload of other stuff too) It's true that they have brains that are gendered differently. It's amusing how intense the leftist cognitive dissonance is from everything relating to transsexuals and gender equality. S…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 12:51 AM
3

Yeah, I thought this was satire as well. Also remember that the best way to fight something is to pretend to join their ranks and discredit it. Provokerism. Whoever dreamt this up is laying it on a little too thick, IMO. It needs to be more subtle.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 06:47 AM
30

prostitution is much older than civilization
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 06:46 AM
1

I haven't watched Bo Burnham since 2008, but I get the feeling that that was the point of the joke.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/15 05:48 AM
5

One of the tenants This is actually the 9th time I've seen that world used incorrectly in the last 2 days
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 10:09 AM
2

Everything about this story is so uniquely Japanese. The dedication to perfection, blindly taking up your family's craft, still working at the age of 103 or whatever.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 10:08 AM
11

She seriously sounds like she's 18. Most responsible teenager in the house
/r/MGTOW01/06/15 10:03 AM
5

Always subtract an inch if it's 6'0" or below.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 07:45 AM
0

like parking stuff is mostly only enforced during the daytime. HAHAHAHAHA where the fuck do you live
/r/TheRedPill31/05/15 07:09 AM
11

Women are definitely more physically neotenous. Shorter heights, flatter foreheads, more soft childlike features, no facial hair, less hair loss, etc. However, it's always seemed to me that men are more mentally neotenous. If you consider being innately interested in things a neotenous trait (and even feminists recognize how women tend to have this trait in childhood, but lose it in adolescence), men definitely have women beat there. I also think there's a very big difference between "cuteness" …
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 07:43 AM
1

Don't you ever think that the concept of equal rights for males, or nullifying female privilege, is inherently impossible? I'm sure you know that women are literally universally advantaged in life. That is to say, that if a woman and a man are equal in some ability, the greater social sympathy for the woman will give her the extra edge. This social sympathy most likely has a very deep origin in our evolutionary history. Females, by definition, invest much more energy into reproduction. So it mak…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/15 01:59 AM
37

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17619-its-true-all-the-taken-men-are-best.html#.VWjUvkYpUSE "The most striking result was in the responses of single women. Offered a single man, 59 per cent were interested in pursuing a relationship. But when he was attached, 90 per cent said they were up for the chase." Seems like they're all the same, whether they're 3 or 30.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/05/15 09:06 PM
1

It seems like there are more men who "understand" the female sex drive (gays) than there are women who understand the male one (lesbians). Interestingly, there are literally millions of xenoestrogens, but only a handful of xenoandrogens.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 08:56 AM
1

Well in the original version, her hag relatives get their eyes pecked out by birds and shit. Just remember that there were guys angry enough to write shit like that 200 years ago, 2000 years ago, and 2,000,000 years ago (if they'd had writing back then)
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 12:46 AM
1

Yup, I can list off every girls name since elementary school I remember liking girls in pre school, when I was freshly 4 years old. I remember touching my penis at 5, although I never got a legit boner/ejaculation till 12 or so.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 12:40 AM
1

Are you straight? I can't really understand how men want so many different girls. I accept it and see it's there, I know where it came from, but I can't see how. You don't know where it came from. Males who desired many females had more sex. Females who desired many males had more sex. The desirous males were much more fit, because male individuals have a much higher reproductive potential in every species, with no exception. Plants, frogs, fish, insects, mammals, all obey this rule.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 12:39 AM
1

The main thing they do is inflate the price of women to a ridiculous degree. Before internet, a chick could only get hit on a limited amount of times in a day. Add to this the male anxiety of approach, and potential loss of reputation due to being labeled a "womanizer", and the rate of approach was still not super high, even for universally attractive women. Today, any given woman's profile can be viewed by a practically near-infinite amount of males in a near-infinitesimal amount of time. In ad…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 11:16 PM
3

I never said that points shouldn't be deducted. I just said that every person who was lax about it was male.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 09:44 PM
2

Cultural programming and lack of critical thinking. Same reason why it's okay to eat pigs but not horses.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 05:16 PM
2

anymore then I would extrapolate observation from bonobo chimps to human. You often hear feminists talking about how bonobos love sex so much, but I find it hard to believe that the bonobo females aren't more or less as picky as females of other species.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 04:21 PM
1

That beta chimp looks like Alton Brown.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 04:15 PM
3

Something almost identical in humans: White women viewed pictures of white men, and rated their attractiveness. Dark eyed/haired white guys were rated as significantly more attractive than blonde/blue eyed white guys. However, when the researchers photoshopped the features so that the lighter guys had dark features, and the darker guys had lighter features, the women chose the photoshopped lighter guys (originally dark featured). Turns out, melanin is linked with the masculinity of a face. Darke…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 04:10 PM
85

Literally every teacher who docked my grade for bullshit reasons (coming in 3 to 5 minutes late, subjectively deciding my art wasn't good enough in an English class, etc.) was a female. Literally every teacher who didn't give a fuck when you turned in your homework, or went by test scores and not homework at all, was male.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 08:13 AM
1

Do you live there? I doubt the average height is 5'10", probably more like 5'7".
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 07:53 AM
1

Will probably be downvoted but: Going bald that early is not normal, and is most likely a sign of hormonal distress of some sort. Baldness is a trait that has become more and more apparent at younger and younger ages due to factors other than "hard genetics". Other such traits include height, myopia, IQ, prostate cancer, and testosterone levels, all of which have changed radically in short amounts of time. For what it's worth, I doubt women outside of high school/early college care much.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 07:46 AM
1

What country are you from? You don't type like a native English speaker. 5'6" is considered short relative to the American average of 5'10". In a place like Japan, 5'6" is pretty normal.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 07:40 AM
2

http://data3.whicdn.com/images/51913513/large.gif
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 07:38 AM
3

brb, moving to ubekibeki-stani-stan.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/15 07:27 AM
1

1) Women have a lower sex drive than men. This is because men have 17x more testosterone on average. 2) Women are much more risk averse and afraid of failure than men.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 06:55 AM
26

I can't imagine that the French government would let you off the hook for that, when they specifically outlaw it in the first place. It's kind of like those occasional cases where the guy records the consensual sex he had, and uses it as evidence against the rape charge, it only nets him into more trouble because he has a Y chromosome.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 05:41 AM
3

apparently Hollande is only 5'7", lol. I thought you were referring to Sarkozy specifically. What's up with European leaders being so short? Putin, Medvedev, Sarkozy, Hollande, Berlusconi...
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 05:38 AM
21

It already is rape in Israel. Arab had consensual sex with Jewish girl, failed to mention he was Arab and not Jewish. Arrested. Although to be realistic, that's probably got a lot more to do with Jews hating Muslims, than with feminism.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 05:36 AM
2

Women are just as sexual as men, but only for men that give them tingles. Which means they are not as sexual as men, since you have to qualify it with that condition. Which person is hungrier? A person who won't eat unless it's at a 4 star restaurant, or a person who goes dumpster diving? Testosterone raises sex drive in both genders. Men have ~16x more T than women do. Women's T spikes when they ovulate, which is incidentally also when they are the most open to unrestricted sex with strangers.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 09:31 PM
2

Psychology is not a science. Psychology majors have lower IQs than STEM majors. Psychology is heavily female, and often pursued as an "undecided" major by people who go to college with no plan in mind. If you're looking for social science/humanities leaning people who would be receptive to TRP, I would imagine philosophy and anthropology would have more than average.
/r/TRPOffTopic26/05/15 09:23 PM
7

Just because members feel they understand why women act like they do does not stop them from disliking them. That's because most "normal" human beings feel hate toward what they perceive as unfair. For instance, you'll see plenty of vitriol directed toward the financial .01% on subs like news, worldnews, technology, and really pretty much any board that talks about them. Why this vitriol? Because said .01% is infinitely more successful than anyone on reddit could even hope to be. In the same vei…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 06:34 PM
4

LOL. I cannot get why this is so difficult for some people. Because people generally prefer for their fantasies to be true, particularly if they have grown up believing them. Also see the oft-repeated "women are just as sexual as men" sentiment.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 04:48 PM
2

This is exactly why pro-man groups would do well to pose as slightly-more-radical-than-usual feminists.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 04:42 PM
18

Something like 75% of men are effectively devoid of self-awareness (compared to maybe 95% of women) IMO. Which is a shame, because just about every positive feeling people have toward women comes not from a place of rationality, but a place of instinct/discrimination. I noticed it, at its most base form, when I was in elementary school, and I thought some of my girl classmates were cute, but not my boy classmates. I noticed it when my baby sister would get very different amounts of attention fro…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 04:39 PM
1

I'm of the opinion that there are far fewer true alphas on manosphere sites than for the general population. The reason for this is that true alphas have absolutely no trouble attracting women, and very little trouble keeping them (keeping them sexually attracted, I'm not talking about relationships). True alphas are socially dominant and extroverted. Extroverted people spend less time on the internet, analyzing patterns, and doing intellectual things in general. This doesn't mean they're not in…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 12:19 AM
2

One of my strongest networking groups is 100% married, and probably 80% alpha. Just because reddit TRP is 80% young and 90% broke doesn't reflect well on realities. You defeated your own point. How old are you? 30s? 40s? Either way, your generation did not live through the same things that the currently late teens/20s generation lived through. The women of your generation were less spoiled, catty, and had far fewer opportunities to meet men while growing up. The men of your generation were condi…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 11:42 PM
10

I honestly don't think moderate feminism has ever existed. The obstacles that kept women in check balanced out their strengths. The genders are different, so gender roles are as close as one can come to "equality". If you accept this to be true (which I'm increasingly doing), then feminism from its very start was inequal, biased toward the side of women.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 12:57 AM
6

some comments just need to be published in a cyber scrapbook on pinterest.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/15 12:55 AM
8

I think there's something fundamental that makes women more susceptible to this than men. We've all seen women get anxious about picking out simple things, like restaurants. We've all seen how much money women spend on large amounts of pointless things, like shoes and cosmetics. I think this is indicative of a very basic trend. When a woman buys 15 pairs of shoes, the reason she does so is because she is anxious about not having the "best" pair of shoes (which of course is defined by her mood th…
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 12:29 AM
9

For every one message men get, women get 23. http://jonmillward.com/blog/attraction-dating/cupid-on-trial-a-4-month-online-dating-experiment/
/r/TheRedPill24/05/15 12:15 AM
1

I like this one comment: "Whether you fight feminism aggressively as MRAs do, exploitively as PUAs do, or passive-aggressively by checking out of society as MGTOW do, you are still doing better than those cowards who allow themselves to be colonized by it." I never thought to systemize all the "manosphere" movements that way, but what he said does so perfectly. For any problem, one can either directly attempt to remove it, make the best of the situation, or quit.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 09:28 PM
1

But feminism is only the logical consequence of this underlying paradigm.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 09:12 AM
19

She admits through her expressions that she doesn't know shit, rather than feigning outrage and dancing around the point. That alone makes her a 9/10 among SJWs
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 08:26 AM
-2

This post is just another way of saying AWALT. All relationships are open. In the same way that all rights are not actually guaranteed, and all legal promises are subject to change.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 08:07 AM
0

Because TRP has actually been dead for almost a year now
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 03:42 AM
3

Most traits in life are spectrums or gradients, with some exceptions. Gender is discrete and binary. Species are fairly discrete. Race, unpopularly, is pretty discrete.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 03:39 AM
1

It's funny how some of the traits we see in the triad, are, to a lesser extreme, feminine battle strategies. Being more masculine broadens your mating options, and having wider mating options is a feminine quality. There are a lot of neat little paradoxes like that.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 03:36 AM
1

This is how women "compete" with each other. Gossip and finger pointing. This is how men compete with each other, too. The difference is that men are consciously aware of what they're doing.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 03:35 AM
3

I agree. There should have been a fourth material that claimed to be as strong as stone, but more malleable. Maybe something that's malleable when wet, and hardens with drying (adobe?). She abandons the stone home, and flocks to the new material, and builds a much prettier home which is purportedly just as strong. The material fails. Someone else lives in her stone home now. The end.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 03:14 AM
2

Also probably why we like apocalypse/action/horror now
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 03:07 AM
3

stone - alpha clay - beta househusband dirt - greater beta provider house - relationship extravagance of the house - the woman's unrealistic relationship standards. Complete control (clay) is a failure, partial control (dirt) slightly better, no control (stone) the best. damage to the house - emotional weakening of the man, and evaporation of woman's initial attraction fixing the house - emotional support from the woman, which can rebuild the house/man's emotion. However a damaged foundation wil…
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 03:03 AM
1

unnecessarily long. Native > African > Hispanic > European/Middle Eastern > Asian/Indian female > male grabbler > non-grabbler
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 12:13 AM
1

It's definitely black women, but not only for the reasons you're thinking. It's true that black women are double minorities, being of both female and URM background. However, it's also true that black women are comparatively much more naturally advantaged than black men in a feminine system of education. In Asia, there is no gender gap in educational achievement; Korean males do just as well as Korean females. In Europe/"Caucasia", males are outperformed by females (as far as GPA and booksmarts …
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 09:40 PM
12

when you are the biggest group of people in the country. and also the most privileged, objectively speaking.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 09:28 PM
8

I'm pretty sure they are, in record numbers. Too lazy to look up the statistics, but sex reassignment surgery has been around for at least a few decades now.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 05:17 AM
35

We've always been shat on I've said it before and I'll say it again: There are only two types of societies in the world: Societies that are shitty for men, and societies that are really shitty for men. As long as you're the former, your civilization can continue to thrive.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 12:23 AM
9

This is why so many high profile rape cases are below average or at best average looking women. Logically, it would make far more sense for the most attractive women to be raped at higher rates.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 05:24 AM
7

Most people are stupid. Same goes for the kids at any ivy league university. Only difference is instead of plain old average stupid, you'll just find ~115 IQ work maniacs/trust fund kiddos/athletes. Getting into an ivy league university isn't that hard if you actually work toward that goal from the get-go. Only catch is you have to actually let your entire life revolve around that goal--move to a less competitive school/area, not be too financially "well off", change your name to try to take adv…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 05:18 AM
2

Oh the irony. She really wants to redefine reality to a world where she was left emotionally broken by sexual assault? Who would want that? ...oh wait, I know, someone WHO WASN"T RAPED BUT LOVES THE ATTENTION. Or someone who's too ugly to be raped, and desires for it to be plausible. This girl is definitely not a looker, and it wouldn't surprise me if that's at least partially behind this.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 05:02 AM
1

That's such a perfect fit in so many different ways, it's amazing.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/15 04:52 AM
1

IMO, this is a mediocre post. 1) you create a false dichotomy between the "amoral" hypocrite and the "justice"-based guy. The reality is that everyone on earth has very strong hypocritical feelings regarding the golden rule; it's just that a select few are able to consciously recognize this hypocrisy, and the only logical step after doing that is to internalize amorality. Moreover, a single individual will often vary wildly between these extremes as a function of time and environment. 2)"These p…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/15 07:59 PM
9

only to come out the next day super sad about his beta ways and micro penis. most men have a micro penis when they bang a landwhale
/r/TheRedPill18/05/15 05:57 AM
1

He said best president in his lifetime.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 09:13 PM
3

Women can have maximum 50 kids, realistically 10, given unlimited access to men. Men can have maximum 20,000 kids, realistically 20,000, given unlimited access to women. Women are guaranteed to give birth to a few children. Men can go big, but run a much larger risk of doing nil as well. As a man, avoiding risk is risky in itself.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 09:10 PM
6

through_a_ways principles: Any developments which ease the process of communication between geographically distant places increase net female hypergamy. Any developments which ease the physical toll and risk needed to live will increase net female hypergamy.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 09:07 PM
17

Women have always sought experience, not outcome. They will regularly work towards "experiencing" things but rarely to building or discovering things. In a way, the opposite is true. Men have an innate interest which drives them to do things. Whether that thing is botany, engineering, math, life science, coding, cooking, or even sex, men tend to like the activity independent of the status associated with it; they like the experience. It is intrinsically motivated. Women tend to jump on things wh…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 09:03 PM
1

?
/r/askTRP13/05/15 10:19 PM
0

Good to know. But wouldn't be ideal if wife material was a bit of both? I mean if you're going to marry her, she can't look like a super modest chick who can't give you a hard on. Let me give you some hard examples Wife material: http://ax2pix.persiangig.com/image/Tak/009/001/Amber-Heard-American-Actress-Models-Elegant-Woman.jpg http://assets.rollingstone.com/assets/images/story/taylor-swift-promises-change-on-her-next-record-20131015/taylorswift-624-1381846117.jpg These aren't "worse looks", th…
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/15 01:38 PM
-1

I'm sure it varies, but in my experience (meaning both my own preferences, and what I've heard from lots of other guys), a really good fuck is opposite from a really good wife/gf material. A really good fuck: short, petite, nice round fat ass, tiny waist, plump lips. GF material: medium/tall height, "elegant" looking, medium/sharp features, more "shapeless". The former gets my boner up. The latter gets me to go beta and want to write songs and poems (and by extension other non-sexual things, lik…
/r/RedPillWomen13/05/15 04:40 AM
2

I have seen actual racist posts there, ones that get upvoted and even have supportive comments, and that's cool, but being subbed to TRP is the line? Women are a privileged group that have the unique ability to masquerade as a persecuted one. No matter what you think of affirmative action, black violence, etc., minorities actually do have it bad. Whether you should be obligated to care about that, though, is a different issue altogether. Meanwhile, when you evaluate women under the same criteria…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 02:15 AM
2

I was banned from /r/science with no reason given, just out of the blue one day. Cemented my belief in the prevalence of the liberal circlejerk in modern science.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 02:02 AM
3

Also, be aware of your MMV (marriage market value). MMV is not identical to SMV. Often the two are inversely correlated. And yes, MMV is dependent on physical features, not just how you act.
/r/RedPillWomen12/05/15 07:46 PM
-10

There probably are actual conspiratorial elements promoting feminism, but you're right that it need not be behind every, or even many, instances of feminism. The real reason feminism is so powerful is because women are superior to men. What I mean by this is that if you take a male and a female who are equivalent in every regard except gendered appearance, the female will be superior (obviously this is realistically impossible, I'm only speaking hypothetically). Everybody likes women more than m…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 05:12 PM
1

when you have women on your side, you have a better chance of surviving. Where? In a lawless world where the strong dominate by virtue of applying violence? The more lawful and safe a place becomes, the less advantageous it is for the men who inhabit it. The world has been following the feminist direction since the neolithic.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 05:02 PM
4

Dont bother reading the cuckfest reddit thread on this topic, it will not address the issue: male deamonization and its root cause, rabid feminism. Most redditors are unconsciously partially redpill. They just loathe making the transition.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/15 01:54 PM
1

There's no elite conspiracy. I'm of the opinion that there doesn't need to be a "concerted" conspiracy for these types of things to happen--I think a lot of people unconsciously do things that advantage their particular role in society.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:52 PM
3

This was a great post man. Here we assume Arab countries are more traditional and male-centric all the time compared to the "decaying West." There are only two types of societies: ones that advantage women and ones that advantage women a lot
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:49 PM
2

Jews are prominent in said liberal media simply because they're prominent in highly g-loaded professions. I would say that being a Hollywood producer is very much not a g-loaded profession. That's not to say that it doesn't take immense skill; just that it's not something that IQ would immensely benefit. For example, I can name far more great black directors than great black physicists.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:47 PM
16

Red Pill Men tend to activate the crazy in women. If you were Beta you wouldn't be noticed. This is not true. Plenty of cases where a woman becomes unattracted to a man she fucked, so she rationalizes it as rape to save her conscience.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:06 PM
-2

I prefer sheep over cattle. Cattle are at least kind of smart, sheep are total herd animals.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 08:42 PM
6

The through_a_ways Principle: Any development which facilitates communication between geographically distant people will increase the net hypergamy of women
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 03:43 PM
6

On the same side, a large portion of comments on here are utter shit. The difference is that a very significant portion of them are critical and well thought-out. Compare to a feminist site, where there are essentially 0 of these types of comments.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 03:39 PM
-1

consider the fact that women are more likely to be bisexual (or bi-curious) than men, as they are encouraged more/shamed less than men. That's not why women are more likely to be bicurious. It's because women are more physically attractive. Males were strongly selected to have a desire for women. These males pass on their genes, so that each generation of successive males has a stronger desire for women. Some of the genes make it to their daughters.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 06:04 PM
3

The black plague never got them. The pink plague, however..
/r/TheRedPill09/05/15 05:59 PM
2

Additionally, prolactin spikes are 4x greater after sexual intercourse orgasm than they are after masturbation orgasm. Easily explains OPs scenario.
/r/askTRP06/05/15 08:31 PM
2

Natural Hierarchy is actually the long term ideal which Red Pill does NOT presently advocate TRP doesn't advocate or not advocate any of those systems. It simply describes them. Besides, what's so bad about natural hierarchy?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 10:08 PM
1

But how much smaller is the stdev? And even then, Asians still have a higher spatial split, combined with a slightly but significantly higher general IQ. I'm still partial to my theory.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 02:47 AM
5

You just have to look around, I know what I know because my hobby is reading shit like this, rather than watching the Giants/Mets/Heat. Not that sports is a bad hobby, it can definitely get you in the right place with some crowds. If you want another nice little tidbit, you can clearly see r/K selection at work in the wasp family, among species that are abundant in North America. Yellow jackets have the biggest hives, and they mature the quickest. They are also the most aggressive. They have squ…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 02:29 AM
2

If it was on steroids at least they'd be losing fat
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 02:19 AM
30

girl: "I would never date a guy who's fucked around a lot" me (thinking): except that statistically, most of gender would love to, and you're the 10th one who's told me that this week... I was just spontaneously reminded of that Fairly Oddparents episode (yeah I know) where the dad repeatedly states that women "mean the opposite of what they say". Vicky was in a ski lodge log cabin or something, and they were in an avalanche. There's also one episode where the alien guy can't stand love and affe…
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 02:07 AM
13

and the opportunity to have to pay for the girls meal every "taco Tuesday" You buy her a taco, she gives hers to someone else
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 02:04 AM
5

Squatting 375 does that for me. Risking downvotes by saying this, but: Why is everyone so insane about squats? Isn't it more masculine to have a bigger chest/back/waist/shoulders? Why would you want to make your butt and thighs thicker?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 01:57 AM
1

but it's also the case that Asian IQ generally has a lower standard deviation than Caucasian IQ Where's the evidence for that? The link you provided shows verbal IQ, and it's well known that Asians have a higher spatial/verbal split than Caucasians. Using PISA as a proxy for IQ, Asians come up with higher smart fractions: http://www.iratde.org/issues/1-2009/tde_issue_1-2009_03_rindermann_et_al.pdf
/r/TheRedPill03/05/15 01:02 AM
1

Not really. I never said race was irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 06:50 PM
2

That's a shame. Xbox sucks ass.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 04:14 PM
0

Smart fraction theory has nothing to do with it, IMO. The latest study I've seen puts Asians at the highest smart fractions, at any case, followed by Anglos, with Scandinavians at the lowest, with a 95th percentile of only 116 IQ. What DOES have something to do with it is risk averseness and conscientiousness. Asians are more hard working and risk averse than whites, who are in turn more than blacks. We know that in America and the west, boys do worse than girls in school, because the nature of …
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 04:07 PM
0

Corporations have no nationality. Intelligent people have no nationality. Nationalistic thinking is generally for the weak, undesirable members of a nation, who have nothing else positive about themselves, that they define themselves by the arbitrary borders of the soil they were born on. Yes, America had the best and brightest, and still may, although it's much closer now than 50 years ago. But that fact is pretty meaningless, and the idea of "America" itself is now meaningless, beyond superfic…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 03:55 PM
7

It's not necessarily intelligence that would be the defining attribute of natural selection anymore. Of course not. Most life is utterly devoid of intelligence. Humans are a mere blip in evolutionary history, and will probably remain so. We are very K selected - We have long maturation times, naturally low fertility rates, and we probably evolved for some time without the threat of predation, so that the smarter and more slow maturing among us outcompeted and reproduced more often. There are man…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/15 03:51 PM
1

I'm gonna come out and say it--your English is terrible, for an 18 year old. Excusable if it's your second language. Inexcusable if not.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/15 07:02 PM
1

If what you initially said was true, women with undesirable qualities would breed at a lower rate.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 03:56 AM
1

Chicks don't know that, or even vaguely think about this. Men with undesirable attributes are culled, but women with undesirable attributes will reproduce, because they are women. These women will then give birth to boys and girls with their inferior genes. The natural way weeds out men and gradually improves the gene pool, but imposing actual restrictions would make the process run to completion in just a couple of generations. Additionally, some of the undesirable attributes are actually desir…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/15 03:39 AM
3

African Americans have around an 85 IQ because they've mixed with European genetics Partially because of that, and partially because of the higher living standard (Flynn effect). AAs are ~20% white on average, but they've recovered about 50% of the IQ gap. So we can say that 30% of the IQ gap was due to environmental conditions.
/r/askTRP28/04/15 05:33 PM
1

Genes that make for attractive or desirable males comes at cost to the females. So make males more desirable, at the cost of females? It's not like men don't want women enough already. I (and I think most men) would be more than willing to fuck 5'8" girls with flat asses and pretty faces.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 05:25 PM
5

Women are the reason that bad genes of any sort exist. Realistically speaking, we would improve society exponentially if we imposed restrictions on pregnancy for women with attributes that are undesirable in men. There would still be inequality and hypergamy if everyone was a supermodel, but it would be much, much less pronounced. There's a region of naturally diminishing returns.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 03:37 AM
18

Why does that sub lock up good threads with lively discussions? Isn't the whole point of internet forums is to have good discussions rather than a circlejerk? Whenever a developing comment thread starts getting at the inherent inequality that men face, it gets nuked. People on relationships, bluepill, twox, sex, etc., simply can't handle the cognitive dissonance of admitting that men in actuality have it worse than women in almost every sphere of life, because they don't care about men. Nobody c…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 03:36 AM
3

Same thing with /r/science.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 03:24 AM
2

1) Why is she balding 2) Why does he look like a girl
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 06:36 AM
1

whatevs
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/15 04:32 AM
6

America is just a large experiment in epidysgenics. I regularly see guys with manboobs and fat cushy bodies, and girls in their 20s with huge fat asses and aggressively receding hairlines. I'm not sure exactly what it is, but somewhere during the last half century, something went horribly wrong. Is it the birth control in the water? The corn/soy diet? Or just the antagonistically feminist environment? Who knows.
/r/RedPillWomen27/04/15 03:56 AM
1

These joke-feminists and SJWs need to realise that the rule of law doesn't turn a blind eye for some people because wymyn. Except that it does, regularly, and always has.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 08:15 PM
2

I don't even know who's being serious anymore
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 08:13 PM
1

The pictures were very telling. More proof that feminism is 5 - 7s raging against 9s and 10s.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 07:40 PM
3

she literally started crying and basically said that she should have the "freedom" to feel "comfortable" wherever she goes to the point of being able to tell shop owners what they can and can't put on the walls. I mean, it's already accepted policy to ban male students from class because they physically resemble a rapist
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 07:34 PM
2

Because your comment demonstrates a poor understanding of human evolution, poor usage of grammar and spelling, and a warped and unjustifiably hopeful view of reality.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 06:42 AM
1

Serious question: Are you 13?
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 06:33 AM
1

To me TRP advocates teaching us how to be better "animals" as that's what we all are. I don't want to be an animal though. That's all you are, and it's all you'll ever be. We know way too little about science for cyborgs, designer babies, robo GFs, etc. to be possible in the next 3 or 4 decades. Not only that, but the genetic changes you'd have to make to "fix" the sexual landscape are politically incorrect to even recognize in the first place, for multiple reasons. Not only is it PI to admit th…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 06:32 AM
5

3rd world terrorist group behead hundreds of boys and burn them alive = nobody gives a shit One woman gets raped = over 9000 uplikes on reddit
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 06:17 AM
4

TL,DR: Women are pretty, so men like them. Men aren't pretty, so women like them based on usefulness. When we invent technology that makes men obsolete, and shuttle women into jobs that they are less qualified for, we should expect that men get genetically culled.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 06:08 AM
6

Breaking up: "Because once upon a time you had a bond and were disposable, and you knew that one of those 5 guys in your age would choose you. And now you have the whole world. And a lot of possibilities. So it's so much harder to reconcile with those little disadvantages. When you can just change the topic."
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 05:52 AM
1

You want change? You merely have to convince a bunch of conservative old white men to not give away their money. THAT'S what will have a real impact on the situation. >he thinks males aren't a competitive gender >he thinks powerful high status males give a shit about what weaker, poorer, low status males have to deal with >implying Bill Gates' son could ever be tried for rape, even if he legitimately raped someone
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 02:57 AM
2

I'm pretty sure 17 year old me wanted sex more than future 50 year old me.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:43 PM
1

Bad analogy. The correct analogous situation would be a football player not being signed even when he had better skills.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:41 PM
1

Reminds me of the whole virginity thing. A man can always sleep with more women. A woman cannot unsleep with men.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:37 PM
6

This is why old school SAHM working man couples in the 50s worked so well. 1) She stays in and doesn't get men offering her all day, which makes her less confident and less likely to cheat 2) He goes to work every day, which places a premium on his presence, because it's relatively rare.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:18 PM
1

it reminds me how bad we actually are, feeling sorry for a cute girl because she's sick while not giving a single fuck about another ugly girl Or giving a fuck about women, and not men.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:31 AM
0

saying she's your own kin is like calling people with same DNA predisposition to prostate cancer as me my own kin, it's another one of our society's lies. Prostate cancer is controlled by a few genes at most. Race is determined by millions of genes. Scientifically, there is no way that an African can have more genes in common with a European than another European. They may have different prostate cancer genes, but when you look at everything, people of the same race are more genetically related …
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:29 AM
5

Assuming that 0 men committed to her, and that she's not hideous, it means that she filtered you out as worthy of her sexual attention, not that 0 men were willing to commit to her.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:04 AM
5

3) It shows that women take their values/morals/likes/dislikes from those immediately around them, and change them at the drop of a hat
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 07:00 AM
0

Would you rather fuck a 9/10 that's dumb, cc riding party girl, that will end up a stay at home mom or a 7/10 that's smart, motivated and makes money? If I owned fucking facebook? I'd wife the 9/10 smart girl.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/15 06:48 AM
11

We are the modern women of the millennium. We are unapologetically ambitious, fearlessly driven, creatively thinking, vehemently hard-working and awesomely outspoken women who fervently refuse to f*cking settle for anything less than we so deserve. I loathe people who write like this too, be they feminist or gay or trans-vegan, or whatever. They just write like this to create a supposedly badass image of themselves in their head, and broadcast it for the world to see. Except it's not badass, it …
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 05:26 PM
3

Is it just me or are American women in particular just more aggressive and power-hungry than women anywhere else in the world? America = Canada > UK > Aus/NZ > Europe > everywhere else dat dere anglosphere cancer. Thanks for the federal reserve, old chap.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 05:21 PM
6

other than as targets for derision and humiliation for not being a creature that followed the natural order of things It is the natural order for a large portion of men to be unfit.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 05:20 PM
0

Girls in general exemplify this so often that it's hard not to take away sexist views from it. In my HS, we had loads of girls who aced every test in every AP class, I'm talking 98s and 99s consistently. I, on the other hand, was getting anywhere from a 70 to a 98, depending on how much I'd studied the night before/day of. I was in mathletes, which is basically math tests that you don't study for. It was pretty grab bag, and you have an alotted time to do 6 random problems. Studying doesn't help…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 05:15 PM
-7

1) she's unattractive 2) she's Asian and he's white, meaning he's shooting under his weight
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 04:58 PM
1

kids that scoop 4.0s and rape the act (32-36) end up getting into elite colleges. Only if you don't go to a competitive high school. At the proper school, you can get both of those and still not get into any ivies or sub-ivies. Just an aside, did anyone else get the impression that the ACT was an overall shitty test compared to the SAT? It just seemed so...stupid. And so, so, boring.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 04:56 PM
1

High school academics are not particularly challenging and excelling at them isn't that significant. If you go to 98% of American high schools, this is true.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/15 04:51 PM
5

rule 1: don't talk about redpill. Yet, everyone talks about redpill. So in reality, rule 1 can be restated: rule 1: rules don't actually matter
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 06:41 PM
3

That's really the main thing most women are after, and I think it has to do with the fact that women haven't evolved a "functional" sex drive in the way that men have (simply because there was no reason for them to) I've noticed that when I hang out with guys, I tend to favor the types of guys that women would probably be more likely to have sex with. In other words, when my inherent sex drive is a non-factor, my "default" drive is similar to a woman's "sex" drive. Women's inherent sex drive is …
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 06:39 PM
3

Women are like dog shit...the older they are, the easier they are to pick up
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 06:36 PM
3

It's not really going to prove anything though, we all know what would happen, and white knights gonna white knight.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 09:33 PM
5

Women are just cuter and more adorable than men. Even at 3 years old.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 06:47 PM
3

Women are hyper aware of their social status and will do anything to climb up. I wonder if this is one of the main things that keep women from pursuing more traditionally "male" interests. It's true that boys have more of an intrinsic interest in traditionally male things, but I've heard anecdote after anecdote (and have seen them myself) about girls who had boy-typical interests in elementary school, only to become stereotypical girls sometime around middle school. It's almost as if the hormone…
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 06:43 PM
3

No one even knows what a "right" is. That's because there's no such thing as one. Your rights are prescribed by natural law. If you can do it, you have the right to do it. Welcome to real redpill.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/15 03:09 AM
1

Society follows upon opportunity, and opportunity follows upon technology. Agrarian technology ushered in dramatic social changes. The industrial revolution ushered in more. The pill and the service economy ushered in more. The internet more still. As far as "envisioning the future" goes, every single one of those changes made the globe "smaller". They made humans more interconnected, and they increased the relative value of women. As long as precision genetic engineering doesn't exist, this tre…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 09:56 PM
2

I'll do you one higher: Not only are we having children at later ages... ...But we're also reaching adulthood (biologically, not culturally) faster than we did in the past. So it's actually even worse than it initially looks.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 09:49 PM
8

their fertility issues is now directly linked to the fact that they used lead to line their aqueduct systems Huh, good thing we've figured out that lead is bad for us. There certainly aren't any other endocrinologically active agents in our environment which could drastically change the growth and development of future generations. I mean, it's not like we're seeing people get myopia, infertility, down's, autism, baldness, etc., at higher rates and at younger ages than in the past, right?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 09:44 PM
5

To say that a woman would love a woman more based on personality than a man is a feminist lie. It is not a "feminist" lie, so much as a consequence of the halo effect, where we view certain traits more positively. Such traits include height, attractiveness, garb, race, and gender. Gender isn't a simple one-way proxy, which is why you get feminists ranting about it so much. It is true that when we see a guy saying something vs. a girl, we tend to take it more seriously. It's also true that when w…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/15 05:29 PM
8

It's the "useful lie". Being too rational isn't a good thing. To properly enjoy life, one must be deluded on several different levels. Romantic love/emotional connections are just another one of these delusions. By "delusions" I don't mean something that you consciously believe in. You can be redpilled as all fuck and still be deluded if you "feel" emotionally connected to people, partners, things, ideas, etc. You wouldn't function if your feelings didn't lie to you.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 08:23 AM
2

In my experience friendship groups of girls all tend to go for the same type guys. Meaning if you're not good enough for one of them you're probably not good enough for the others. ♬ ♪ If you wanna be my lover, you gotta get with my friends ♫ http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/library/articles-commentary-blog/who%E2%80%99s-chasing-whom-impact-gender-and-relationship-status-mate-poaching
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 12:04 AM
3

The biological selection urges that women possess do have merit in selecting superior men. I'm of the opinion that, much like our primitive urges to eat calorically dense foods and put off work, our sexual preferences are maladaptive to the environment we're currently living in. Big butts/hips and very tall heights are associated with lower metabolic output, and (in the case of the latter, although possibly the former as well) shorter lifespan. In a civilization like ours, the most neotenous tra…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/15 11:58 PM
4

While she does not give much conscious thought to why she feels attracted toward a man, it's still logical, because it follows a pattern. True, but while both male and female modes of attraction are logical, they are different. Female attraction is more complex and "fluid". A good way to think of it is this: if female satisfies P(x) (physical attractiveness), then A(x) (she is attractive) is satisfied. if male satisfies S(x) (social attractiveness), then A(x) he is attractive) is satisfied. The …
/r/TheRedPill12/04/15 11:48 PM
5

Sure, go ahead. Link me if you end up doing it.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 08:03 PM
19

All of these terms are actually used semantically incorrectly. Nearly 100% of people who are labelled as "racist", "misogynist", "conspiracy theorist", "anti-semite", etc. actually objectively aren't. For example, most people who are labelled anti-semitic don't actually hate Jews. Even the ones who do hate Jews aren't anti-semitic, they're anti-Jewish. Some of the strongest "anti-semites" are actually Semitic themselves. Furthermore, the Jews that are usually the targets of so called "anti-semit…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/15 07:37 PM
2

This is a great comment. Nearly everything about female attraction ultimately boils down to power (social power and physical power).
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 05:01 AM
2

I always find it funny how much women complain about creepy creepers trying to have sex with them. This is known as a humblebrag. Most women don't outright hate creeps; they actually appreciate, on some level, that there is a man who is interested enough in them to behave creepy; but they also revile the thought of having sex with him.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 04:58 AM
1

Hold the fish. It isn't womens fault that you sit at home in your pants jacking one out instead of chasing tail or seducing your girlfriend/wife He never implied it was their fault. If I say that Asian women don't sexually satisfy me, I'm not saying that they should be faulted for that. You seem to be reacting to this pretty emotionally. With regards to the chasing pussy thing, consider that T levels in men are significantly lower worldwide than they were 50 years ago. Meaning that there is both…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 04:55 AM
16

The stock market price of pussy has crashed for alpha chads - for low status betas, Zimbabwean hyper-inflation. Just like everything else. The rich are richer now than they ever were before, and the poor poorer, when speaking comparatively.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 04:44 AM
11

"femaleness" is defined by investing more energy into reproduction. When sexual reproduction first happened, there were no genders. Eventually though, because division of labor is always more efficient, the small, light gametes paired up with the big, immobile, nutrient dense gametes much more often. And genders were born. Everything of value comes from either females or dead organisms. If you don't want to kill an organism for your food (meat, root vegetables), then you have to exploit a female…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/15 04:41 AM
7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%9CWomen_are_wonderful%E2%80%9D_effect
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 10:25 AM
6

This is also why feminist subreddits repeatedly censor comments. When polite, thoughtful comments point in the direction of female supremacy/privilege/powertalk, it is dangerous for the feminist collective.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/15 09:06 PM
4

Women are built for LTRs. Society simply isn't.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 04:00 PM
40

But boy was I wrong, these women are absolutely broken and beyond repair. They become more cold, jaded, and less able to pair bond after every client they see. They are very good at hiding it when seeing clients. Ironically I find that the sweeter they were with clients the more cold and jaded they were in real life. Girls with high numbers are damaged. Guys with low numbers are damaged. But the good news for the guys is that you can always add, but not subtract, deeds.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 01:34 AM
4

Conversely, feminism has encouraged masculinity in women. Feminism is a population-level "shit test". And society failed :)
/r/RedPillWomen05/04/15 11:56 PM
1

That man is literally a woman, mentally speaking. I can at least sort of understand a woman having written that article. They don't have the same urges and feelings that we do, and they don't want to bang just for the sake of it. But for a man to have written that article, he either has to be lying, or so thoroughly emasculated that he lacks an actual sex drive. Seeing as he's Jewish, it's a toss-up ;)
/r/TheRedPill05/04/15 09:13 PM
4

oy, I believe you've implied something of an antisemiotic nature...you'll have to come with us into this dark room over here...
/r/TheRedPill05/04/15 09:11 PM
4

This article is a perfect example of what we call "projection". He is insecure. Deep down, he feels that he is too young, too old, too fat, too thin, too poor, too stupid, or too whatever to be desirable. He uses flirtation, porn, and extramarital sex as a way to feel better about himself, to reassure himself that he is still desirable, worthwhile, and “good enough.” oh wait, a man wrote this?
/r/TheRedPill05/04/15 09:00 PM
2

That said, I am personally looking into moving to the states after this winter. Enough. You'd probably want to avoid the northeast, then
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 11:49 PM
1

But the weather in Iraq sucks even more, you moron.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/15 11:48 PM
1

I'm pretty sure their looks have a lot to do with it as well. Neotenous features are generally more attractive, particularly to prepubescent people, be they large eyes, big heads, longer torsos, or light skin/eyes/hair. It's also worth considering that Jane didn't practice hypergamy, but the complete opposite. She did something that only a man could ever do (and even then very few men), which was to shack up with some random jungle boy.
/r/TRPOffTopic30/03/15 09:57 PM
5

This is slightly off-topic, but as a man I'm always surprised by the tendency of women to delete their posts when someone calls them on their bullshit. At least deleting your own posts is ethical, since it's your own content. You should see the types of reasonable and well-written comments which routinely get nuked on women-based subreddits because they bring up points which are politically incorrect, or go wildly against the mainstream narrative (not this one of course).
/r/RedPillWomen30/03/15 03:42 AM
1

Of course, all women are special.
/r/RedPillWomen30/03/15 03:38 AM
5

And the other aspects of the legal system, and aspects of society/technological progress, which have inflated women's value. Also synthetic estrogens errywhere probably can't help.
/r/RedPillWomen30/03/15 03:38 AM
11

the whole “FEMINISM DID THIS!!” sentiment you find in Red Pill thought has always stuck in my craw. Feminism is just a symptom of a bigger problem, which is that our societies are too safe and large. The entire globe is basically a society itself, since there are far fewer boundaries to movement today than there were just 2 centuries ago.
/r/AlreadyRed29/03/15 08:46 PM
2

because to them it is something that's basically always really accessible And also because they have a lower need for it. Low drive, high supply.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 02:14 AM
23

Sex isn't a need. Neither is love, social interaction, money, or anything else other than macronutrients, micronutrients, water, and oxygen.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 02:12 AM
-2

Where do those wads of cash come from? Though competition and hard soul crushing work. Actually, they come from money printing machines.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 12:25 AM
2

Japanese people have the least sex in the world, on average. Americans have the second least.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 12:21 AM
20

"History is decided by the hos" - Snoop Dawg
/r/TheRedPill29/03/15 12:17 AM
-9

Females are born knowing the game. For guys we have to learn the game. I think a lot of men would do better to be more feminine. Being more "feminine" is often advantageous. A feminine mind is more social, more sociopathic, a feminine work ethic is more organized and good at meeting deadlines, and a feminine dating pool is very large.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 05:50 AM
1

That's cool and all, but I've never seen any solitary statistics backing up their supposed rape problem. It seems like there's a hell of a lot of selective criticism of Russia, China, and now India, in the west. In other words, the largest and most advanced third world nations. I don't think it's a coincidence that that we see so much negative publicity about these countries, and that they also happen to be allied against the dollar. I can think of a shitload more countries that are far worse wi…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 03:18 AM
1

Why does she look so manly?
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 02:38 AM
5

African American males who currently buy into Civil Rights dogma will become disillusioned once they get thrown under the bus as Feminism takes over. Didn't that happen like 80 years ago? I thought the whole failure of black society was that the government introduced welfare, which nullified the role of men, which created the havoc you see today. The promotion of lesser qualified women in the workplace, and divorce laws which are biased towards women, are how they're getting it to white America.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 02:36 AM
3

You're gonna have to clear up your original comment first Sounds like you're saying that men might enjoy pursuing women, for the sake of pursuit. I'm saying that isn't true.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 01:50 AM
1

"Damn girl, you got a nice booty!" An example of sexual violence
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 01:49 AM
2

Uh, what? Are you a girl or a guy? Men generally don't give one iota about whether the girl initiates or he does. If anything, many prefer the former.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 12:53 AM
0

Yup. That's part of the reason why women keep orbiters around, nice guys exist, and guys do their looks real girly.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/15 12:49 AM
2

Do you want to be expelled? If so, then yes.
/r/askTRP28/03/15 12:45 AM
1

I want every woman to like me. How do I get over this? Stop being a woman
/r/askTRP25/03/15 03:47 AM
3

Makes me think that that sub is satire http://cdn.superbwallpapers.com/wallpapers/minimalistic/slowpoke-15187-1920x1200.jpg
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 10:54 PM
1

lol, that's actually a subreddit?
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 10:53 PM
9

I was banned from /r/science out of the blue. No reason given, and none of my comments on that sub were angry or argumentative. I suspect some mods may have dug up my posts here.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/15 04:07 PM
1

Two to one says that's an actual subreddit where people gawk at nice looking sentence structure, while missing half of their potential membership because they opted to use the cringe-worthy and trend-following suffix of "-porn".
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 10:35 PM
68

The comment thread by Thomas_Becket and Silmariel was completely deleted. Certainly not the first time I've seen whole threads of uncomfortably true comments get censored by mods. Lying about being a virgin. If I recall correctly, she had a reasonably extensive sexual history, while he had none. [reply by silmariel]: Ah! Well that is pretty bad. I kinda get why the husband would be heartbroken about that. He probably felt it was a significant thing being her first, and then to find out he was li…
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 05:20 PM
1

Yeah, good point. I should have said ceteris paribus
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 05:52 AM
2

I think the highest point would be around age 20 or so, wouldn't you?
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 04:22 PM
2

Haha, I thought that word was due to my feminism-->nazism extension
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 04:15 PM
1

I mean, her ass is even flat for how "thick" she appears. That seems to be par for the course, when it comes to indian women (Asian women too), judging from the ones I see at uni. Either they're skinny or they're just not attractive.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 06:55 AM
30

Guns, Bodybuilding, Martial Arts and Hunting All of those activities are sexist, racist, and/or antisemitic
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 06:10 AM
1

The first anecdote was of a post-wall woman over 400 pounds repeatedly having decent guys ask to marry her. I'll believe it when I see it.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 04:18 PM
2

It could take the form of a conversation where the rapist uses persuasive manipulative language to get them to agree to it, leading them to view it as alright, something they should go along with. Even if the victims did recognise what was happening, they might just freeze up out of shock and not be able to fight back. Let it burn, let it burn Can't fund this farce anymore Let it burn, let it burn Let's go to Russia or Mexicoo Your rights end Where my feelings begin Let the left rage on, The fac…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 06:10 AM
5

The price got higher, and the quality got lower. In that sense, women are no different from the things I buy at the store.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 06:02 AM
45

This is kind of hyperbolic, IMO. The wall exists, and it is detrimental to a woman's goals. Can a woman over 30 get sex? Absolutely. But does that matter? Not really, since they're women. Saying that women have it easy because they're having sex is like saying that babies have it easy because they're allowed to suck on woman's nipples. First off, you wouldn't want to be fucked by a guy (or drink a post wall woman's breast milk), so that doesn't really make any sense. Secondly, you don't judge a …
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 05:35 AM
1

I haven't heard someone say "smh" who wasn't black (or didn't hang out with a lot of black people).
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 05:26 AM
2

The harsher the environment, the stronger the patriarchy, and the more feminine and compliant/submissive the women. And the more egalitarian the power structure is. As society becomes more advanced, it becomes bigger, power inequalities grow larger, and so does sexual inequality (among men)
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 10:01 PM
22

If you have a 2.0 GPA, you don't hold out for Harvard.
/r/RedPillWomen19/03/15 09:55 PM
24

Your rights end Where my feelings begin Groupthink will rage on, The facts never bothered them anyway!
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 09:51 PM
6

Every innovation that increases ease of life is disadvantageous for most men. The conditions of paleolithic Europe were so harsh that it was men who were valued more than women, not the other way around. As a result, men only provisioned for the best looking women, which led to nearly all modern Europeans having light eyes (even if brown, they are much lighter than the brown eyes found amongst non-whites). The same selection process happened in Siberia/Canada, where the natives have lighter eyes…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 05:37 PM
35

That behavior wasn't female. It is, and you go on in your post to recognize why it is so. Men desire/empathise with women so much that many will gladly do favors for them simply because they look hot. The behavior may not be inherently female, but it is female for all real world purposes, because men won't experience the same behavior from women, and thus won't expect it from them.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/15 02:52 AM
1

I think the most difficult part of instilling delayed gratification activities is that some of them are arduous with little or no gratification for years until you hit your goals. Most people's problems come from the fact that they can't even wait days for a reward, let alone years. Don't use the big stuff as an excuse when we can't even do the small stuff.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 07:53 PM
0

Better yet, also do NoSurf. I think mindlessly browsing the internet is a type of instant gratification. However, if you are browsing it constructively, it is not. I could be spreading myself thin randomly clicking anything on reddit that looks remotely interesting, OR I could be trying to understand something by researching it and taking notes.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 07:52 PM
3

I've mentioned this dichotomy before, so it's good to see others realizing it as well (hopefully it was independent of any of my posts) Many "instant gratification" activities can potentially be "delayed gratification" in nature, depending on the details. Example: Video games. Playing an adventure-style game which is slow moving, non-linear, has puzzle elements, and has few "rewards" (Metroid Prime, for example) is very different from playing Call of Duty, where you're mindlessly reacting, and g…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 07:44 PM
3

It is indicative of sensitivity to DHT, which while related to testosterone does not correlate to increased levels at all. It correlates to an increased androgen response, which is more or less the same thing, all other things held constant. However, things are never held constant in practice, and I think the process of balding is part of a general change in the body where it becomes more responsive to protective hormones/upregulates the mechanisms that produce those hormones, because of other f…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 12:56 AM
1

I have nothing to say about colonic flushes. I was merely addressing what you said here: If anything you ever suggest is 'alternative medicine', It is NOT science, and will not work. If it worked, It would be called medicine.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 08:25 PM
1

most women age pretty horribly. especially asians and indian women Asian women age pretty well, Black women age the best, Indian/Latina/other non-white age the worst. Proof that the phenomenon isn't due to melanin.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 05:10 PM
0

If TRP worked, it would just be accepted as normal.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 05:06 PM
0

there are girls with ugly duckling syndrome who do actually get pretty attractive after 28ish No. There is no woman in existence who "gets attractive" after 28. There are a few who can fend off the decline somewhat, and even some who barely have a decline, but there is no woman in the world who gets better looking after 28 than she was at 18.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 05:03 PM
1

I've heard a few woman let slip that they started preferring taller men upon finding out what their friends desired. Still, I think the majority of it is "natural" attraction.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 04:59 PM
24

Followed by temporally periodic snapping of the fingers in a spatial z formation
/r/TheRedPill17/03/15 08:02 AM
2

Women were not ever naturally selected to have interesting hobbies. Innovative/curious guys could often become better hunters or providers, enabling them to have more children. Women have never been culled, and men have been culled to hell. Hypothetically speaking, a eugenicist would do well to focus almost exclusively on the females of a species, as that's where all the weak genes get passed on.
/r/askTRP15/03/15 06:12 AM
3

They just accumulate baggage Both emotionally and physically
/r/askTRP15/03/15 06:09 AM
3

I can't stand the word "toxic" anymore. It got catapulted from near-nonexistence to ubiquity in the span of about a year. Maybe it's just a metric for how unhealthy society is becoming, meaning that more people use the word if they feel that the people around them are becoming worse.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 04:00 AM
5

But women know something a lot of men need a little more education to figure out: Sexual attraction is completely separate from whether or not you like someone. Not really. At least not for women. Women fuck the men that they love (and hope for commitment). Men marry/nurture the women that they love (and hope for sex). Women marry/extract resources from men they don't love (and withhold sex). Men pump-n-dump the women they don't love (withhold commitment).
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 07:30 PM
1

bazaar, not bizarre.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 04:39 AM
0

Even longer answer: Women never evolved a strong sex drive, because it was never advantageous. Sexually desirous men sired more children. Sexually desirous women mothered as many children as women who weren't. Therefore, women don't have an inherent sex drive, just a drive that operates off of social cues and stuff, but it apparently gets stronger when they ovulate, which is when they're more likely to have sex with strangers, more masculine looking men, etc.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 04:37 AM
2

And this is why women loved men more in the past. Technological progress is objectively antagonistic to nearly all men, as far as sex goes.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/15 02:39 AM
0

maybe you're just a fag who likes fashion
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 11:51 PM
9

This comment is a real gem.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 06:36 PM
1

That's because you're still seeing a lot of FOB Asians. Give it a few years and the initiation cycle will be over.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 06:29 PM
6

Western-style values are globalized now. Pretty much. This is how the (human) world ends. Oh well, at least Chimps (non-bonobo ones) are still pretty RP
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 06:28 PM
1

Western values. Slumchildren in Africa aren't devouring U.S. media because they're economically prosperous. They're doing so because it's popular, and it's popular by virtue of the U.S. being prosperous. Nation-level social proof
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 06:27 PM
6

I've repeatedly praised Muslims on here, and always gotten shit for it. Most people just can't understand until it's too late.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 06:26 PM
1

It's basically a gender-neutral shit test. "You should be as miserable as I am"
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 06:24 PM
8

People are inherently less capable of empathizing with men, so it doesn't matter. When we see a woman or child in distress, we instinctually want to care for them. When we see a man show emotional vulnerability, it's cringeworthy.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 06:23 PM
2

I don't think it's even necessary for women to go to college. It's not. At all.
/r/RedPillWomen10/03/15 02:53 AM
2

I think it's a latent feeling of being conquered. She knows subconsciously that she's dating a "different", whatever the race is. It'd also explain why so many white guys want nothing to do with women who fuck black guys, and why Asians ditto for white guys Women really love being conquered. And I love conquering :)
/r/askTRP10/03/15 01:19 AM
4

Feminazism has taught women It's not just feminism. Pretty much any social device that gives women more power than men has the same effect as feminism. Since we know that men desire women more than vice versa, any technological innovation that makes it easier for people to communicate also gives women disproportionately more power than it gives men. This trend started with more centralized societies, and ended with the internet. The final culmination would be online dating sites (and the layout …
/r/RedPillWomen08/03/15 01:10 AM
2

Yeah, I didn't really find it funny either.
/r/RedPillWomen08/03/15 01:05 AM
7

Good rule of thumb: Screencap/archive anything of interest. Even barring personal deletion, mods on places like relationships, bluepill, sex, etc., delete politically incorrect comment threads regularly.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 11:20 PM
3

Maybe it's the lighting or something, but your baby looks kind of dark compared to the both of you(not trying to imply anything, just couldn't help noticing that).
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 11:15 PM
2

even if it's in an anonymous survey. Women will absolutely distort the truth on an anonymous survey to convince themselves that they are less slutty than they actually are. y = 1.5x + 1, at the very least
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 11:11 PM
6

Clinton, Bush, and Obama That's a funny way to spell "Woodrow Wilson" Also, it's deflation, not inflation (unless you're talking about male value).
/r/TheRedPill06/03/15 10:53 PM
3

I get more matches from that than Tinder anyway, even with the limited nature of how Hinge works. That's because it's less popular. The less popular an online dating site is, the better it is for most men. An analogy: A small business will have an easier time building a niche for itself in Bumblefuck, Iowa, than in Manhattan.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 08:53 PM
-1

I'm not sure you got the point of that post. It's not meant to be a pleasant holiday, it's meant to be a tough experience in a shithole. That's the point of going. All the things you learn and how much you'll grow as a person I'm sorry, but this sounds like feminist eatpraylove bullshit catered to men.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/15 06:05 PM
0

I'd rather go to almost any other location on planet earth, to be frank.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 11:47 PM
25

"Hey. Wanna fuck?" "Maybe. Are you Christian, Muslim or married?" "Nope." According to the original story, he didn't even lie. He simply didn't proactively tell her that he was Muslim. It would be akin to a guy over here not telling his ONS that he was 1/32 African, and her accusing him of rape when she found out. I wonder which side would win in that hypothetical event, though. I love "intersectionality" (which is code for "the oppressed oppress themselves")
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 02:31 PM
27

Ultimately, government is just another alpha. Except that he can literally kill you and get away scot-free
/r/TheRedPill02/03/15 02:27 PM
4

Aren't all the other ages more insufferable now as well?
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 09:06 PM
5

But they are also annoying and hormonal as fuck during that stage.Not worth the trouble I guess I'm the only one who actually likes the cattiness/dependence that younger girls had.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 05:34 PM
17

It's OKCupid, bro. They can't alienate their base.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 05:33 PM
2

Because I want white children.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 07:40 PM
1

Not overly opinionated (durr feminasm), young, cute, not overly sexual looking, obviously into you, and comes from a well-off family. Also has to be white (or at least Turkish or something).
/r/askTRP25/02/15 05:55 PM
2

Do nothing, nothing happens Do things, things happen
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 05:49 PM
6

So you claim it to not be true, then you go on to describe a case that fits it to a T. lol.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 07:48 AM
1

Empathy is reserved for women, kids, and cute animals. We're not meant to empathize with men.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 04:34 AM
1

Just replace "status" with "power". Power - the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events. The best part about power is that the more power you have, the easier it becomes to attain more of it
/r/askTRP23/02/15 04:32 AM
1

Yup. In the same way that you can make yourself like less addictive foods, you can make yourself like less attractive people.
/r/askTRP23/02/15 04:25 AM
2

She still feels entitled to male interest. I had this happen to me where a woman expressed interest in me and then just magically expected me to be all in 100%. It's better to go from poor to middle class than it is to go from 7 figure income to middle class.
/r/MGTOW23/02/15 04:16 AM
0

That's pretty offensive to cows, not to mention unrealistic. Those things are really fucking lean. Pigs, on the other hand...
/r/MGTOW23/02/15 04:13 AM
57

This dude is a slut. I also really enjoyed this bit: I asked her if she thought he had a thing for her. Her reply: "Oh no, we don't see each other like that. I don't even think of him as a guy. He might as well have a vagina." She's decided that she's not attracted to him, so she hamsters her way into believing that the feeling is reciprocal. Probably so she can continue to accept his favors without feeling guilty.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 03:59 AM
4

"he was super fit and fucking everybody" This is the male equivalent of big tits, big lips, and a waist/hip ratio of .6
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 03:54 AM
-1

That's quite a womanly tactic, if I'm being honest. Checking to see if paper is crumpled in a different way. Not at all, really. Men have much higher spatial intelligence than women. Differentiating between 3 dimensional folds of 2 dimensional surfaces is a very spatially intensive task.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 03:48 AM
1

Yeah, you pretty much described what I said. I agree that there are some women who genuinely don't like older men, but I think they're probably insignificant as far as this trend goes.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 11:07 PM
24

It's like with American cops. "The gun discharged"
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 08:29 PM
9

When that happens, many more hamsters are born.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 08:28 PM
26

My favorite is how any relationship where the man is notably older than the woman, 80 percent of the upvoted comments are white knights and jaded women "warning" the girl that anything she feels for him is a trick and that all older men are diabolical emotional puppeteers. I have a theory about this. Women aren't inherently less attracted to older men, and are often more attracted to them, if everything else is held constant. Yet, you always hear young women trash-talking older men, while you ne…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 08:23 PM
0

A lot of the asses I'm seeing posted on the net are quite muscular and defined (think Jen Selter). So yeah, a lot of the time it could be considered as such.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 04:13 AM
2

No woman is too good for any man. (The reverse is not true.) The way I interpret this is that any woman, under the right hypothetical conditions, could potentially fall hard for any (or almost any) man. The reverse isn't true, because society doesn't tell me to dislike saggy tits, I just dislike them.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:28 AM
8

Plus, the hotter they are when young, the longer the slow natural decline in looks with age. Hottie at 20 = pretty at 40. I don't think so. If they're ugly/fatasfatassfuck when young, then yeah. But I think "average" or "plain" girls age better than super hot ones. A skinny, less sexual looking girl loses little of her physical charm in the next two decades, while a busty curvy girl ends up with bags of sagging fat everywhere.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:26 AM
3

So basically his advice is to brainwash yourself Very fitting advice for the situation.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:22 AM
-2

I've always thought the ass-fetish thing could be considered a bit homoerotic, seeing as huge protruding asses can be easily accomplished with squats. Flat-ass wide hips though, innately feminine.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:17 AM
-5

This. I myself am 5"0 wut. Are you an amputee or something? I've just never seen a man that short, save Danny Devito.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:15 AM
8

Eh, I have the same exact preference. Short girls (like below 5'3") and non-white girls, would not have kids with. Downvote me, don't give a fuck, whateva
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:14 AM
-6

You're pretty gullible then, no offense.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 12:55 AM
2

Bruh stop giving away all the biohacks
/r/TheRedPill21/02/15 12:54 AM
1

Yes, we know. What I was saying is that the male mean is significantly higher as well, to the point where "dullards" by IQ would be equally represented in males and females.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 03:37 AM
2

The Neanderthal species tried a different route. Their females were more masculine and were forced by the tribe to take part in animal hunting. They got killed more often, while being pregnant and that is one of the reasons why they have lost the evolutionary war. Don't forget the neotenized, gracile, sexually promiscuous, and relatively tame Bonobos, vs. the aggressive violent common Chimpanzee. The former number ~40,000, the latter ~250,000. And just look at their respective geographic ranges:…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 12:01 AM
10

It's more that the human species was so successful that women did not need to develop into muscular beasts in adulthood, while men still had to. No, it's not simply that women did not need to develop masculinity in adulthood, but that there probably was an advantage to them not doing so. It's why anthropologists think blue eyes spread throughout Europe, and why the Ainu and the Norwegians (who likely had a much longer history of cooking with fire, out of climate necessity) have the smallest toot…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 10:20 PM
3

Yes... but I think there is also a hardcoded genetic gender difference in the receptors / mechanisms of action. Probably. But not everything is genetically hardcoded. I'm not particularly well-read on the topic of epigenetics, but there are plenty of traits that have been increasing at a rate that can't be explained by natural selection: Notably height, IQ, myopia, and (probably) baldness and hypothyroidism. It could be that women genetically produce less T, so they develop a greater sensitivity…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 06:05 PM
11

That goes for both men and women. Estrogen is carcinogenic in large amounts. Birth control that uses estrogen is responsible for a large number of early deaths in women who use it, and if that estrogen isn't being properly detoxified from our water supply, then it's doing the same in men and other women.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 06:02 PM
9

You haven't seen a lot of curves then. Just recently, it was found that female average IQ very slightly edged out the male mean, and there were news headlines about it everywhere. So basically from whenever up until 2012 or so, males had higher mean IQs. Not to mention the tests are probably quite slanted to female strengths by now. Ever remember seeing any sort of spatial rotation question on a standardized college entry test? Didn't think so.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:55 PM
1

Yeah, don't bank on them putting something that expensive in our water supplies. I think they could do so with estrogen, since synthetic estrogens are extremely cheap to manufacture (not so with androgens) Also fluoride doesn't do shit except maybe make you subclinically hypothyroid
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:51 PM
8

While testosterone is higher (17x or something) in men and it is responsible for the sex drive in both sexes, women are more sensitive to its effects. I've sort of thought about that. We know that sensitivity to dopamine increases when we abstain from pleasure. We also know that sensitivity to adrenal hormones increases when we abstain from stress. So it would make complete sense if women, who have very few androgens, were more sensitive to them, and if men, who have fewer estrogens, were more s…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:49 PM
25

I also covered these topics on my YT as to why equality is a dead concept once you understand how we are hardwired as far as DHT/test/estrogen/progesterone Keep in mind that estrogen has its uses, even in men. But it's true that estrogen is more harmful, simply because the society we live in promotes stress (and thus estrogen), and even contains many xenoestrogens. Even if we lived in a traditional society, there are millions of compounds in nature that have estrogenic effects, simply because th…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:46 PM
57

That's the point, so you'll get diminishing returns on fugliness, and large returns on logicality.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:43 PM
0

Pissing me off that men can take hormones to become more of a woman I don't think men can really become more lady-like, except for in their minds. Everything about testosterone reads like a biological "irreversibility". Just look at MtF vs FtM transexuals. The former almost always look like men in drag, unless they transitioned before puberty. The latter always look like normal men. The Y chromosome is the "extra" one, the X chromosome is there by default I think I remember reading that fetuses …
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:42 PM
7

We have the geniuses and the conquerers, but we also have the idiots. Honestly though, mean male IQ is significantly higher than female IQ to the point where there should be as many male idiots as female ones. I suspect that the perceived prevalence of males in special ed programs is because of other anti-academic male qualities, like lack of social intelligence and work ethic.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:40 PM
2

Just wait till it goes back up, I guess. It was basically liberal doublethink mind-explosion type of stuff, with lots of hamstering. It's hilarious how different "oppressed" groups actually do more to oppress each other than any of the so-called oppressors.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 05:24 PM
12

Only takes a cursory glance to break the feminist myth of yellow fever. What's funny is that in their collective bluff to shame white men, they've actually made themselves look far more shameful. Which reminds me, there was even a redditlog thread on here about some Indian girl complaining about her brother dating a white girl and ruining her friend's relationship. In the comments, a comment-thread developed on the topic of how Asian/Indian men have it uniquely worse in the dating game. For some…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 06:57 AM
13

Even more interesting: correct for long term mate preference (marriage) instead of short term (online fucking/dating). A lot of white guys will date/fuck Asian women, because why not? In the same vein, a lot of women will marry a man they're not attracted to, because why not? The guy gets a free fuck (the evolutionary cue of spreading your genes) The woman gets a free beta provider, and in recent decades, gets a free ticket to hellimony. Interactions don't take place if there isn't something to …
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 06:37 AM
3

Right. "Easier to control," pretends that she's strong and empowered. I think that there's a bit of truth in that, because among whitemale asianfemale couples, there are an extremely large number of jewish guys, who tend to be weak, submissive, controlled by their wives to such a large extent that it's a known stereotype.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/15 06:30 AM
3

I could do with slightly less, honestly. Somewhere around the amount that people living in Denver get.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/15 02:02 AM
1

Maybe I should have clarified then, inherently better in our current environment. Which means that they would survive better in the current environment of modern western civilization, assuming that the trends that have held for decades don't do a complete reversal out of nowhere. Obviously there's no such thing as being truly and objectively superior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 11:15 PM
0

As a white man with a severe, lifelong case of brown fever and an unrepentant love of Mexican culture, I strongly disagree. IMO the best of the white girls fall under the "Eastern Euro" category. So you like girls who are half American Native, half white. And you think that a certain type of white girl is more attractive than a different type of white girl. How do white women have inherently "better" genes? If anything it seems like the azns are the master race. White women have inherently bette…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 08:54 PM
3

Race ~= social status, that's about 90% of the crux of the matter Although it could be that Europeans are inherently more adept at creating large systems that produce that racial-based status stratification. I've also heard some theorize that minority women prefer white men because white women are more beautiful than non-white women, so they subconsciously want to have an advantage for their daughters in addition to their sons. If marriage trends are anything to go by, this seems to be somewhat …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 03:05 PM
1

While it's probably mostly a social status thing, I've always noticed that Indian people (both girls and guys) look really weird to me. Objectively, they look more similar to white people than Africans or Asians. But instinctually, they just look weird. I've also noticed a lot of men claiming to be less attracted to Indian girls than to girls of other races. The OKcupid data doesn't support this, but it's just what I've noticed. Personally, I think Indians just occupy an "uncanny valley" when co…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/15 02:23 PM
3

I think being compared to this guy is an insult to all men who take cock up their ass.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 08:20 AM
6

the nice guy caretakes, he pretends to be kind, listening, and caring but with a hidden agenda for sex. That's mostly feminist bullshit that isn't true, imo. What is true, is that men (and women) have an innate instinct be kind and emotionally available to women. "Nice guys" pursue a feminized male strategy where they actually feel emotionally closer to these women after becoming their validation tools, and want to take the relationship to the next level. To the guy, the woman is special. While …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 08:19 AM
-3

We were never meant to be civilized, imo.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 08:05 AM
3

I didn't see him described as having intercourse with equine feces.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 08:04 AM
4

But what if I don't care about Indonesia?
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 08:03 AM
3

All that damage control
/r/MGTOW15/02/15 02:07 AM
1

As much as "nice guys" complain about not being given a relationship for being friendly, there's absolutely NO shortage of girls who complain about being pump-n-dumped. Dear women, no, we don't owe you anything for having sex with us.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 09:32 PM
1

Between this and sexbots, I see the latter coming through first. We've made very, very little progress in the field of medicine, and very, very, great progress in the field of artificial intelligence/robotics. You could argue that the medical industry by design stands to gain less by curing things than by creating problems to be cured. It sounds like conspiracy bullshit, but I could rattle off a list of corrupt selling and marketing practices, as well as specific instances of drugs that were pus…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 09:00 PM
0

No, they're both double standards, or neither of them are double standards. Because those two working guys are not the same guys, and probably don't have the same relationship with the boss, same salary bartering habits, etc., their situation is analogous with the sexual one. Men and women are different. It's expected to apply different standards based on gender. Different individuals are different. It's expected to apply different standards based on individual differences. Double standards, the…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 08:51 PM
1

Fascinating. Good thing they controlled for race, results would have been useless otherwise. There are also dietary factors that could be creating an "unstable" environment in some sense.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/15 07:57 PM
3

They can exist in a state of "equilibrium", but they will never be "equal". It's worth noting that that state of "equilibrium" is atypical, and existed for a blip of our evolutionary history. As far as I'm concerned, feminism, climbing divorce rates, dropping fertility rates, and the myriad health ailments that have been increased by the environmental factors of the last century, are all part of nature taking its course. We were never "meant" to be civilized, it was all just an accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/15 06:37 AM
3

Not true. Men want what other men want. Nope. Men's desires converge, but they are not causatively affected by what other men like. Many men like big tits, but not because other men like them. Women's desires are causatively affected by what other women like. There is likely a good amount of the "intrinsic" attraction in women as well, but there is a very significant amount of "social" attraction. Source: "who's chasing whom"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 09:53 PM
1

I think both men and women are incapable of empathising with each other's turn-ons, turn-offs, etc. Guys like girls with big asses/tits. Reverse isn't true. Girls like tall guys. Reverse isn't true. Nobody really calls people out on their physical preferences. People who have the short end of the stick will bitch about it being unfair, but few seriously treat the fact that girls are more attracted to tall guys, or that guys like white girls more than black girls, as something that needs to be ch…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 09:48 PM
7

So being worried about being divorced is dumb. Being worried about jumping off a cliff is dumb as well. Got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 07:54 PM
6

Being promiscuous is a choice, having a penis isn't What does that have to do with anything? And how do you know it's a choice, and not genetically determined to a large extent? (no I'm not going to address sex changes) That's very transphobic of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 07:37 PM
6

well, at least in some cases, it is just insecurity with her having had more experience, and a lot of the reasons TRP gives for it are along the lines of "she probably had a better partner than me previously if she'd promiscuous." No, the real reason is the insecurity of raising a child that isn't yours. A woman that has slept around in the past is more likely to sleep around in the future, and thus your chance of accidentally raising a child that isn't yours is increased. Also statistically you…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 07:26 PM
7

I wonder, do you consider yourself a promiscuous person? If so then its fairly hypocritical of yourself to judge women for being the same way. Do you consider yourself a person with or without a penis? Are you attracted to people with the same penile status as yourself? If not, then its fairly hypocritical of yourself to judge other people for being the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 07:23 PM
4

OP is arguing that men have instinctual reactions to sluttery, much like an infant has an instinctual reaction to smile when mommy smiles at it. I didn't see that argued in the OP In any case, I'd say that the aversion to providing for a slutty woman is just as instinctual as the concept of even providing long term support to women. Not as instinctual as sex, or suckling, but close enough to each other. Look at your own example: why regulate masturbation -- call it "bad" -- if it's not an instin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 07:13 PM
1

Not really. Women are more attracted to men when there is some type of confirmation of other women being attracted to that man. Men don't show this preference at all towards women. So an FMF threesome isn't selfless at all, it's actually quite selfish. It just happens to be mutually beneficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 07:03 PM
11

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Women are the gendered equivalent of Jews. Both extremely privileged groups masquerading as "downtrodden"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 06:53 PM
2

I'll go one further, OP. Neither men nor women empathise with one another on any meaningful level. This means that we do not really understand their feelings However, people in general have an intrinsically high level of platonic attachment and concern toward women. This could be primarily inborn, primarily socialized, or an even mix of both. I personally think it's mostly inborn. This isn't really the definition of empathy, but I guess the effects are the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/15 06:51 PM
3

Well it makes sense imo. Fat acceptance people tend to take more sociology courses
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 02:27 AM
-2

Personally, I don't have a problem with sex selective abortions. If a woman wants to get an abortion for whatever reason, that's dandy. Of course, this is logically inconsistent with the idea of alimony/child support.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/15 02:20 AM
2

Note that I'm not suggesting you ignore attraction either. What I'm suggesting is that you be sufficiently introspective about your instincts so as to avoid being hurt by them. I've thought about this before. I believe that both mens' and womens' sexual drives are mismatched with a civilizational environment. 1) Men prefer women with low waist:hip ratios. Hip and butt fat have a higher proportion of polyunsaturates than ab fat. Polyunsaturates also reduce the capacity for oxidative metabolism, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 07:51 AM
2

How would she know what other women are attracted to? The data says that women are significantly attracted to purely social markers (like whether other women desire a man, regardless of what he looks like), while men are not. Furthermore, the "looks" that attract women most tend to be indicators of social status and power, rather than objective facial attractiveness. 6'2" guys command more respect and make more money than 5'5" guys, but women with big butts don't get more respect or have better …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 07:31 AM
0

TRP wouldn't exist or need to exist if sleeping around was considered as much of a taboo as having sex with goats if only fucking GOATs were as weird as fucking goats :)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 07:25 AM
3

gaylubeoil is pretty funny wish I could say the same for anyone posting on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/15 06:08 AM
1

Your protip happens on this subreddit and on conspiracy to try to scare people away from the real message. I know. I meant that it should happen in other places ;)
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 02:22 PM
1

I mean more the "popular" scientific hivemind that exists on reddit. Where an idea is accepted just because someone in an authority position (could even be as simple as someone with a lot of upvotes) said so, regardless of how faulty the reasoning is. There is also the issue of political and financial interests in science, but that's different.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 02:21 PM
2

Same. Not even criticizing you /u/cover20 , I just want to know your actual reasoning. I've seen more than enough examples of the "medical consensus" being wrong, so I don't reflexively deride people who don't vaccinate. Additionally, I definitely think everyone should have the legal right to not be vaccinated. But, I still would like to see some real evidence, or at least convincing theoretical basis for not vaccinating.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 04:00 AM
4

Buy that organic $10 gallon of milk that is literally the same as regular milk. Don't vaccinate you're kid! Except that reddit is viciously against organic foods and anti-vaccination.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 03:58 AM
0

Or a basic reddit answer "is this gluten free?" I'm pretty sure the reddit consensus is that gluten-free is a meaningless trend. If something isn't supported by the "scientific" hivemind, then reddit doesn't like it.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 03:57 AM
10

Whats their endgame, and for what purpose? You don't necessarily have to have a coherent endgame in order to be doing stuff like this. Simply advocating for what you perceive to be in your interest is an endgame in itself. Also, protip: The best way to discredit X is to pretend to be an X, and act like a stuckup, stupid, racist/homophobic/hypocritical dumbass.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 03:48 AM
9

So women want to be inferior to their partners, not inferior in general. If women are inferior in general, they have a much larger pool of partners to pick from. If they are equal, they have a much smaller pool of partners, and have trouble securing commitment, which often leads to a dissatisfied life and single motherhood.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 07:11 PM
6

Still don't see how that's related, unless you think that enslaving black people against their will is literally equivalent to treating women according to legally defined gender roles. If you seriously think they're equivalent, I'd argue you're either very ignorant of history, or a flaming racist. Women were (and are) treated several orders of magnitude better than blacks. Furthermore, there's no evidence that blacks like feeling inferior to whites, there's actually a lot more of the opposite. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 06:33 PM
10

Cool. Don't see how that's related.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 07:08 AM
8

wut
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 06:50 AM
18

But it promised to better the lives of women. If you accept RedPill reasoning, which is that women are happier when "inferior" to their partners (which is actually incredibly strongly supported when sorting by myriad socioeconomic metrics, such as income, height, race, "desiredness", etc.), then feminism worsened the lives of women, as it made them higher in status, and thus limited the pool of men that they could be attracted to. As an analogy, you can think of the intense, addictive flavors of…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/15 06:39 AM
1

Makes me think the masculine ones are the "true lesbians" the feminine ones are just sexually fluid and looking for the best branch. I've wondered the same thing about gays. I've heard a lot of gay guys state that they wouldn't mind fucking women, and it made me think that there were two fundamentally different types of gays, with the bottoms being more "true gay", and the tops being more fluid. The other thing is that I've seen a study saying that a large portion of gay men had very masculine d…
/r/askTRP08/02/15 12:47 AM
2

No, we acquire value too. Women don't acquire value from the men they bang, they acquire value from the man they wed.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 09:12 PM
5

They both cause and result from each other. Social proof is a thing.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 07:16 AM
2

That's...an amazingly great example.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:51 AM
7

hit on the ugly girl routine
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:41 AM
1

Prob lost a few cylinders too
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:40 AM
-9

Holy fuck this is the best comment on reddit ever
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:38 AM
2

Men do not derive their value from the women they have sex with They do though. Our value goes up when we sleep with more women, proportionally to the attractiveness of said women.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:37 AM
4

In much the same way that a nice guy is overly nice and emotionally vulnerable to the women he meets.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:33 AM
25

And he probably won't remember what she looks like in a week. Even assuming that he wasn't drunk, and doesn't have severe head trauma lol
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:29 AM
2

Eh, I dunno. It's certainly not as beta as responding with "I don't know what I'd do without you!", as it's active rather than passive. Plus, a lot of women are genuinely turned on by violence and rape-like stuff.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:18 AM
3

Don't swing too many branches or you'll ruin your alveoli
/r/TheRedPill05/02/15 06:10 AM
2

I think everybody need some degree of variety and spontaneity in every single sphere of their life. The fact that you didn't say the standard "I love you", combined with your actual feelings coming through, probably sealed it.
/r/RedPillWomen03/02/15 11:10 PM
1

Nope, you just didn't read it properly. Scroll up, it's there and unedited
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 11:00 PM
1

You implied (or perhaps even said directly) that the amount of sex would never decline. No I didn't. I said it wouldn't decline from 20 - 40.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 10:55 PM
2

When did I say anything about 75 year old men?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 10:49 PM
1

would be happiest with the exact amount of freedom they have now, but a dwindling supply of sex Why would their supply of sex dwindle?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 10:31 PM
3

My position is this: A playboy will be happier unmarried than married. (more access) An average joe will be happier unmarried than married. (more access, more freedom) A sexual failure will be happier unmarried than married. (more freedom, no divorce) Keep in mind that when I say unmarried, I mean unmarried until the mid 30s or 40s.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 10:27 PM
2

Yeah but correlation =/= causation. My bet is that single men can be divided into two groups: playboys and permavirgins. And we know there are many more of the latter than the former.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 10:22 PM
1

Only about 6% of the US population makes six figures. Coincidentally, only about 6% of the US population uses Reddit. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2421391,00.asp
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 10:19 PM
2

Because by and large, men who follow the strategy of maintaining casual sex and not settling down until older age are most probably happier than men who got married young. Obviously we're not talking about permavirgins here, but I'd wager that this lesson applies double to them, since they're undesirable to begin with, and thus are more likely to be taken advantage of in marriage. And women who married as virgins are more happy than women who had more premarital sex partners (this one has data b…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/15 10:15 PM
0

And alpha stands for "Always: looks, power, height, absence"
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/15 11:48 PM
3

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12414881 There's much more out there, keywords "girl, toy, CAH"
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 07:33 PM
1

I think watching sports appeals to the guys who can't, never did, or peaked in high school and like to think they could have made it. It's very telling that you always hear things like "we beat you" or "we won" from fans. It's a way to feel accomplishment without actually achieving anything. I can (theoretically) get behind games of an international scale, since those actually have some significant reason to root for a side. But even then, most French footballers aren't ethnically French, being …
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 07:30 PM
3

Unless the boys and girls were raised from birth under control of all variables, we can't know that nurture was removed 3 year old girls show higher interest in spatially oriented toys in a direct correlation with serum levels of androgens
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:51 PM
2

Never got into it, if I can't participate I lose interest fast. Pretty much this, I can't stand watching most sports. Just show me the plays that were worth watching.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:45 PM
6

To be honest, I'm all for it. Teach young girls to be more athletic, teach them to not give a fuck about the media, teach them to stop being whores, and they will grow up to be the kinds of women I want in my life Except it's not supposed to do that, it's supposed to be feel-good bullshit that gets women to spend money
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:42 PM
2

I don't fucking get it. My friends and I were watching this, and everyone got quiet during the commercial. Then, at the end, it suddenly flashes "Always", and we lose our shit laughing. It was almost parodical. If I were a feminist, I'd be insulted, haha
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:40 PM
8

I tried once casually dating two guys at the same time (scandalous, right?), it was pretty much a disaster. First of all, it shows both guys you're not really that into either of them. I'll do you one better: It shows that you're objectifying them. If you are consciously viewing the men in your relationships as objective, mechanical expressions of quality genes/status which are free to be interchanged, then you are viewing and treating them as objects, and not as people.
/r/RedPillWomen01/02/15 06:21 AM
2

This is something I've always basically known, but it's good to see it corroborated anyhow. This is the sidebar-iest of sidebar material.
/r/TheRedPill31/01/15 05:25 PM
0

Seriously, ALL the ready charts seem to be about women. Well, women initiate 70 - 90% of divorces, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/15 05:18 PM
5

I doubt he is flat out lying, more likely stating things in vague, roundabout ways to avoid being offensive and sell books instead. Yup. This is basically what anyone who has TRP views does when speaking in a public forum. And as long as we are critical of both genders, and use enough concern in our tone, we get resounding agreement from "normal" people. When you say unPC stuff, you can't just say it outright. You have to 'dart around' the point a bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/15 06:06 AM
4

Well, duh. When you know how strongly women's preferences are based on what other women think, you know that the drive is mostly "environmental" (even if it's set in stone after some range of formative years) I think height is about the only thing that women actually have an "internal" desire for, but I've even heard a few women admit that their longitudinal desires were due to what other people liked.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/15 05:14 PM
1

Take advantage of this and watch her pupils dilate. Only really applicable if you're dating a white girl.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 12:44 AM
1

I meant should as in "probably will", not "ought to"
/r/TheRedPill28/01/15 02:37 PM
1

Looks like nobody understood the alignment of my comment.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 10:08 PM
6

Branding is the consumer equivalent of preselection.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 08:06 AM
1

Why is there tea everywhere? Why are my gloves so stiff?
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 08:04 AM
4

The Hamster and the Grapes
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 08:01 AM
4

This and the new push of "rape by deception" laws in the US Well, you're supposed to learn from your masters, no? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_deception#Israel
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 07:52 AM
-8

Soon it should be illegal to feed your kids saturated fats.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 07:50 AM
-3

I might not be a woman, but really now? How do you feel men typically love unconditionally? I'll butt in. Men love through physical status, women love through social status. Social conditions typically change much more quickly than physical ones, so womens' love is more conditional than mens'. The notion of the "fluid female sexuality" is very popular in psychology.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 05:01 PM
2

Because "femaleness" is the trait of having fewer reproductive trials, with a larger amount of energy for each trial. Because of this, it necessitates that males evolve to desire sex more than females (unless the organism is inanimate, in which case the male simply evolves to have a greater reproductive output)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 03:29 PM
2

Mother nature also hates feminism and unchecked hypergamy. Along with a lot of gender unrelated things that have become common in the last half century.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 02:10 AM
1

if theres a brand of weiner nobody else is buying, its fully stocked on the shelves untouched and cheaply priced, i wouldnt buy it either but analagously, there are plenty of weiners that lots of people buy which taste like absolute shit to me.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 02:04 AM
-1

I don't want to have sex with/take care of a human with a dick I have a double standard that disadvantages men :)
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 01:55 AM
2

It's just that most men don't care and most women do. Ironically, this brings it right back to TRP (male vs. female spaces)
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/15 07:07 AM
2

You aren't a slave and we don't want you to be. Speak for yourself, I prefer my women to be part-time slaves ;)
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/15 07:05 AM
5

I know a lot of blue pill women are these things, but come on, there's a lot who aren't. "lot" is a very poorly defined amount. The other thing is that it sounds like you have a case of "I'm special". Part of actual redpill (as opposed to redpill just discussing sex) is realizing that everything can be boiled down to rational self-interests or perceived interests. It's disillusioning because it's true, and it makes life lose some of its magic. Part of the pleasure of having women (other than sex…
/r/RedPillWomen24/01/15 06:58 AM
1

Science has proven that their cognitive dissonance is so powerful that women cannot even decide what turns them on or not. "Women get off to rhinoceros sex" - Ogi Ogas
/r/TheRedPill23/01/15 10:10 PM
6

omg so toxic
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 06:47 PM
10

TRPs is mostly comprised of life's losers who are upset that women don't want to be with...losers OMG stop shaming us you filthy sexist xD Seriously though, your post is retarded on many levels. Feminism didn't give us first world status, first world status gave us feminism. Yearning for a more stable environment doesn't make you a "loser", as there are many economic benefits, and even romantic/sexual benefits, in such an environment, even for the the most desirable of men. Female sexuality is f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/15 03:52 PM
1

I sometimes go "feminine" in TF2. When there are lots of combat roles being played, I go medic. Medic is pretty easy to play in comparison to the others, but I add more value by doing the "dirtywork" than by playing another redundant role. It kind of reminds me of something I've read about Japan, which is that individual competition is shunned in favor of group competition, because of the collectivist and humble culture. I wouldn't want to be a "househusband", because I don't like the idea of be…
/r/RedPillWomen22/01/15 07:03 PM
-1

White people eat spicier food than Asians, from what I've seen. We just had less access to spices. Same thing with cilantro, Asians have the most visceral reactions to it, followed by whites.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 01:22 PM
1

None of those places regularly use spicy food. Paprika and mustard aren't spicy, lol. And Japanese only use wasabi as a condiment in specific circumstances. India isn't related to the rest of Asia regardless of what the definitions are, and (east) Asians and Africans are more likely to have super sensitive taste buds.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 01:16 PM
0

Certain fats promote metabolic dysfunction
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 01:12 PM
6

It's easy, just imagine eating amazing food every day vs. once a month. In which scenario would you appreciate it more?
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 07:13 AM
2

I don't think anyone really eats spicy food outside of Szechuan, India, and Mexico. Maybe Thailand as well. I've had loads of Korean food, Ethiopian food, Chinese food, Vietnamese food, amongst others, and none of it was spicy. Koreans use a very mild type of red pepper, so the food looks a lot spicier than it is. Although some people think things like Doritos and chicken fingers are spicy, so I guess I can see where you're going with this. An interesting observation is that capsaicin is suppose…
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 07:11 AM
0

I can't respect anyone who jokes around on Facebook about their plans to use chloroform gas to rape classmates. So if I jokingly say "I'll murder you in Halo 3", I should be expelled? Serious question
/r/TheRedPill20/01/15 07:05 AM
4

Yeah, big dogs like Great Danes and Irish Wolfhounds typically have half the lifespan of normal sized dogs. I don't think small dogs are necessarily dumb, I think they're more neotenous. Puppies bark a lot more than adult dogs, which bark more than wolves.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 11:48 PM
4

It's just facts, no insult or compliment intended It's surprising how palpable these things are if you actually pay attention, though. I was at a historic, old, WASPy university (not Harvard or ivies, and I'm referring to status here more than IQ), and I was regularly seeing "old money" type guys who were at least 6'6". I've also heard lots of stories about friends' exceptionally tall relatives dying in their 40s and 50s.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 11:34 PM
1

Another thing to take into account is that white women were very obviously the social ideal back in the 80s and 90s. This made Asian women feel lower SMV, and thus were more submissive (to everyone) Nowadays, more men are willing to date outside of their race, and this drives up the ego of minority women. Why are more men willing to date outside their race nowadays? I think it's partially due to the desperation for pussy in America. From what I've heard, men are less willing to date non-whites o…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 10:30 PM
21

Does society really care if we let a few uglies slip through the cracks? They should, because it's the woman who hasn't been "improved" by evolution. You can see this quite easily if you just look at the diversity of mitochondrial vs. Y chromosomal DNA. Essentially, all the females get to pass on their genes, but only invading tribes/nations of men get theirs. European light eyes evolved through an unprecedented reversal of the selection process, with males becoming so valued that they had their…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 10:04 PM
6

Taller people also have (a very slight) advantage in IQ, assuming everything else ceterus paribus. Unfortunately, they also die earlier.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 10:00 PM
13

It's technically true though. If your wife is happy, you'll be happy. Of course, making her happy doesn't mean supplicating to her and doing whatever she claims to want. It's kind of like "calories in, calories out". Technically true, but false in the way 99% of people interpret it.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 09:56 PM
-9

It can, but saturated fat won't.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 09:54 PM
12

I always put the lid down also, make them work for it still. If you're not putting the lid down before flushing, you might as well be using a third world toilet.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 09:52 PM
2

Women are pragmatic because it was impossible for them to evolve in a way that would have enabled them to feel "instinctual love" Males desiring females = more reproductive success. Females desiring males = no change in reproductive success. So basically the most horny males begat the most children, making males progressively hornier. There was probably some sort of protector instinct in there as well, making the men who were most protective of their women the most successful as well (since othe…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 09:37 PM
1

According to OKCupid, men do this as well. 7s and 8s are more popular than 10s, probably because there's less fear of rejection.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 08:18 PM
1

The hypocritical silence of western feminists when it comes to Islam's treatment of women is absolutely laughable. They force women to walk behind the men, force them to conceal their faces, ban them from driving, cannot be seen in public with men other than their husband, are often forced into arranged marriages with abusive men, and in some countries/tribes, will be stoned for infidelity if raped by a man and there are not 3 witnesses to back up her story... Disclaimer: I'm not remotely leftis…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/15 08:54 PM
2

Northern Europe was actually the last of the Old World areas to come into the neolithic. Basically if you're not a Native American or an Aborigine, you have "agricultural genes" of some sort, whether it be lactase persistence or amylase production I think that the specific type of agriculture that much of northern Europe engaged in (small population density, animal based) is a "sweet spot" between the extremes of hunting/gathering and industrial modern life. You can see the same type of agricult…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 04:22 PM
3

MGTOW is when people drop out and become the "Beautiful Ones". I don't know if I completely agree with that. The way I see it, their are two types of "going your own way" activities men parttake in. 1) Passive activities which take little conscious thought (watching TV, reading the internet aimlessly, most video games, etc) 2) Active activities which take much conscious thought and planning/energy (working out, DIY stuff, using the internet constructively, gardening, learning, etc) Seems like MG…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 04:20 PM
8

You're naive. This just adds more "diversity" slots.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 03:04 PM
2

Just think about it, 3 out of 4 guys don't have kids. 3/5, not 3/4. Really? Do you honestly believe that is the current distribution of procreation? Procreation =/= sex, nowadays
/r/TheRedPill17/01/15 02:28 AM
1

I support what's in my self interest, so yes I support a more meritocratic hiring process.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/15 08:26 AM
2

get complimentary pizza Ever since reading that post about "red hoodoo sauce", no
/r/TheRedPill15/01/15 06:01 AM
0

This post gives off a really neurotic and unstable vibe. Creepy if you ask me
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/15 06:25 AM
3

that means that ANY number of men is an "oversupply". Not necessarily. In the absence of welfare and easy living, men are more valued then they are now. And in that case, when the male fraction decreases low enough, men have higher sexual value than women. This is how anthropologists hypothesize that blue eyes arose in Europe. It was almost universal until then that sexual selection was done by females on males, but the plant-devoid harsh climate of Europe made male numbers go down, and increase…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 10:47 PM
1

While reading all the outraged comments, I just tried to imagine the same reaction to a girl accidentally doing something similar to her boyfriend
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 02:53 PM
1

I've seen quite a few entire comment threads get nuked because they were discussing something non-kosher. This isn't even remotely unique to askwomen
/r/TheRedPill13/01/15 05:31 AM
5

"rabbit" is such a choice animal to use here
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 11:06 PM
1

Blondes are actually more intelligent than brunettes, statistically speaking. Just saying
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 10:49 PM
8

Societies don't tend to change terribly quickly. Societies don't tend to have internet communication either. We do now, though
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 10:47 PM
0

Eh, I only say that because I wouldn't marry a black girl, and I've heard the same sentiment from a very sizeable chunk of my friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 04:01 PM
1

Actually, I remember a report about the Netherlands specifically being mentioned on TRP as an example of a pro-male country, with respect to divorce rates and marital satisfaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 03:50 PM
1

I thought one of the reasons was because white men are less likely to consider black women as long term partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 03:45 PM
1

and what does this say that women in relationships were not interested in pursuing an attached target (since women according to red pill are programmed to branch swing) It's actually commonly stated on redpill that married/attached women are the easiest to fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 12:36 AM
1

I was. It is a research study. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103109001048 that is not a blog
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/15 12:07 AM
1

"who's chasing whom"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 11:32 PM
0

No. That's not causation. That's men saying what they personally rate a woman on a 1 to 10 scale. There is some obvious convergence, because certain traits tend to be attractive to most men, while others are unattractive to most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 09:08 PM
2

You're not understanding the difference between correlation and causation. If men happen to like the same thing, that's correlation. If men like the same thing because other men like it, that's causation.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 08:17 PM
2

google "who's chasing whom"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 08:13 PM
9

Men evolved to desire women, women didn't evolve to desire men. Men that desired women fucked many women and birthed many sons with their desirous genes. Women that fucked many men had the same number of children as women who didn't fuck many men, since ancestrally a woman could typically only have a dozen or so children without dying. Men look at women and just like them. Women have to have environmental indicators telling them that a man is worth desiring, and they will desire him as a result.…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 05:13 PM
12

As the sub grows more percentage of the users will be in the anger phase than not. The fact that he considers the term "self entitled princess" to be hateful means he's likely to be one of them.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 05:08 PM
3

Five Minutes of Alpha = Fifty Years of Pining[1] . Also why the biggest dropoff in marital/life satisfaction for women is after just the first premarital sex partner.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 05:03 PM
12

He's not a bad guy, and there's nothing specifically offensive about him, but he isn't in shape, handsome, interesting, smart, or wealthy. Never mind the fact that she herself is not in shape, handsome interesting, smart, or wealthy either - but that doesn't stop her from secretly resented his mediocrity. It is much better to live as a bum and graduate to the lower middle class, than it is to live as a king and be demoted to the lower middle class. This is probably part of the reason why women w…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/15 04:57 PM
1

In my experience from elementary school to now, men and boys tend to like the girls and women most liked by everyone else. This is anecdote. The evidence says that women are several times more likely to express interest in a man when it is known that other women are attracted to him. The evidence also says that this does not happen when the genders are reversed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 04:13 PM
1

People want the hottest person. I don't think most people are that concerned with dicks or a single dick ruining a woman. You're not getting the crux of the issue. Women like men because of the trait that they are desired by other women. Men do not like women based on how desired they are by other men. There may be correlation, but there is no causation. The OP says that some guys DO like women based on this trait. I replied saying that it may be true for extremely high status men, because there…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 03:26 PM
5

I have no idea whether this is a statistically relevant trend. If it is, it's probably due to the fact that high status men are feminine in terms of their available choices; they can essentially bang anyone they want, much like a female. It could be that once one reaches this mode, they tend to operate on preselection, because there's not much else to get. This also corroborates the trend claimed by many, where both very young and old women are less hypergamous. Older women have lost their looks…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/15 02:11 PM
1

Look, there is no difference between women and men in stem degrees. Each have a good capacity to learn. Sure, but the men are much better at applying their knowledge to novel problems (those not discussed in class)
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 08:08 AM
1

Hamstered into rape, often.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 08:03 AM
3

but I'd be pretty pissed if someone told me I couldn't use it anymore" ah, man, wonder if he intended that
/r/askTRP10/01/15 08:01 AM
1

She was almost instantly baby crazy, asking for marriage. That doesn't mean anything. If anything, the more quickly she asks for marriage, the less power you have.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 09:30 AM
3

The public's disinterest in knowledge was taught. It may have been, but there are probably inherent differences which make certain people more likely to be receptive to those teachings.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 03:54 AM
3

Yes, this is like sex dynamics 101 1900: Female reproductive value is countered by male status and provisioning value 2000: Female status and provisioning value is equal with men's, and men don't become universally more attractive, therefore men fall behind.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 09:28 AM
0

he's just depressed and i'm exhausted and am not able to give him the professional help that he needs The right actions from a woman can be far more helpful than any sort of "professional help" Then again, they can also be very damaging
/r/MGTOW08/01/15 09:08 AM
7

I wouldn't call them anti-sex altogether. They're selectively pro-sex when it expands female choice and anti-sex when it expands male choice.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/15 08:56 AM
1

This was the issue I saw with Myers Briggs tests, it's obvious that they don't work for certain traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 04:42 PM
2

google "male female sexuality fluid"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 12:42 PM
2

shaming language, wasted 5 seconds of my life
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 12:42 PM
2

Everything you post reeks of sophistry and pedantism. "Ideals" are just that. When a guy hits on a girl, he signifies to some effect that the girl is of value greater or equal to his own. So your point has some truth in it For a man to attract a woman, the woman must be of relatively equal or lower value than the man. Because of the higher worth inherent in simply being a woman, this means that a woman has to be of lower value in order to be attracted. The values are not fixed, and they are not …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 12:37 PM
5

For most TRPers "creepy" is just another way of saying "unattractive but still trying to engage with a girl". That's because that's what it means. It doesn't really matter if the unattractiveness stems from some legitimate, universally detectable problem with socializing (like being autistic), or some sort of female-specific indicator of social class. If a girl thinks a guy is below herself in social status, the logic that follows is that interacting with him reduces her own social value.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 12:23 PM
2

so date rapists are desirable? On an evolutionary level, they're definitely more successful than an equivalently attractive non-rapist. people that pay for sex are desirable? More desirable than a completely equal person without the ability to pay for sex. people that women regret having sex with are desirable? Yes, because she had sex with him. Female sexuality is like wind, male sexuality is like rock.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 12:19 PM
1

Yeah, but dating sites bill it as their literal purpose. It's like comparing the soft polygamy we have here with actual legalized, widespread polygamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 12:11 PM
1

I fuck artsy white college girls. I don't think they would ever put their menustral blood in my food... ya think again fgt http://imgur.com/a/hPJEZ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9lmvX00TLY
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 11:18 AM
0

The addition of "red gravy hoodoo" actually makes this thread a lot more enlightening than the average TRP thread.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 11:11 AM
0

TLDR >How to make men like you >Don't be nice to them Just more BP crap
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/15 10:49 AM
1

POE
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/15 10:45 AM
2

sex is not as much of a premium as it is in anglo saxon countries I've always thought this to be true as well. Despite what people say about "the west and feminism", you can break it down further into "anglo" vs. "rest of the west", and then even further into "america/canada" vs. "rest of the anglos"
/r/askTRP07/01/15 09:46 AM
1

Are you asking why black women are much less desired than other races of women? Probably mostly due to physical features, the high prevalence of obesity, and to some extent, social incompatibility and lack of assimilation.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 06:23 AM
2

That, and easy access to food and basic necessities. Modernity makes the male's role obsolete, and makes it hard to decipher female MMV (marriage market value) Basically, extremely female adaptive
/r/askTRP07/01/15 06:10 AM
5

i'm all for encouraging young women into traditionally male careers like medicine, law and the STEM fields I'm not. If women want to join these fields, they will. If they don't, they won't. I see zero advantage to wasting resources trying to change the demographics of a field "because reasons"
/r/RedPillWomen07/01/15 06:06 AM
-1

No idea, don't count calories. I'd imagine it's far easier to take in more calories on a sugar based diet than a starch based one.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 11:50 AM
1

It's not spot on, because I used to eat a lot of spicy food, and after having had very little of it, I can't tolerate it as well as I used to. With TRP, on the other hand, there's no going back.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:55 AM
2

my IRL name is Through A. Ways. I'm fucked.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:34 AM
6

It could've also been a total joke that got blown out of proportion, that wouldn't surprise me one bit. Something along the lines of "Who would you give a roofie to? Jackie, Brittany, or Chloe?"
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:33 AM
5

Is this guy truly a white knight? He's not exactly a white knight either, because he doesn't advantage the girl. A white knight fully supports the girl's decision. He fucked over OP because OP doesn't get to fuck He fucked over girl because girl doesn't get to fuck OP He fucked over betabux because he doesn't tell betabux his future wife is a slut Maybe he just likes to make mad all
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:31 AM
2

Then I went to university. I saw first hand what type of people become teachers "Those who can't do teach, those who can't teach, teach gym"
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:14 AM
0

Social Justice Warrior - mentally/emotionally damaged person who falsely stands for "equality" while pushing for the perceived interests of their own demographic
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:12 AM
1

My dentist raped me while I was under laughing gas, AMA
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:11 AM
1

but all of that goes out the window when he meets maria. maria is young, sweet and naive. Speaking as a man, the best non-physical trait a woman can have is naivety and hopefulness. So cute.
/r/RedPillWomen06/01/15 06:42 AM
1

I'm fucking lucky to be able to eat any fruit out of season compared to our ancestors Speak for yourself, I'd much rather have access to properly ripe apples, peaches, strawberries, and nothing else.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:48 AM
1

I'm ruling out fruits with fiber fruits without fiber* I don't see how chocolate is more harmful unless you're pre-diabetic or diabetic.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:47 AM
1

Yes, they are. "Attractiveness" =/= social status.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:31 AM
1

There's no significant nutritional difference between refined sugar and "unrefined" sugar, that's pseudoscience. One of the reasons everyone says eat more fruit and less juice is that the fiber prevents you from overconsuming. In chocolate, the fat does.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:30 AM
0

It's a shame that 90 - 100% of fruit in supermarkets is underripe though
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:26 AM
1

xanthan gum is just shit in ice cream, regardless of whether it's good or bad for you.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:23 AM
1

What's wrong with eating a chocolate bar here and there?
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:22 AM
-1

Sugar isn't toxic. If you're drinking a can of soda a day, you're just dumb.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:20 AM
0

My personal experience is that sugar is a-ok, and white starch is bad. I was always pretty lean when I ate lots of fruit, juice, pastries and milk. I got fat when I started eating pasta and bread with a low sugar intake. Not sure what whole grains or other starch sources (potatoes) would have done
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 04:14 AM
1

This. It's much less of "lol look how inferior women are male things", and more of "lol look how inferior women are at male things when we live in a society that tries desperately to pretend they aren't"
/r/askTRP06/01/15 02:22 AM
5

Ecologically in animals, males and females have different reproductive strategies: In all organisms, males and females have different reproductive strategies, and this strategy is fundamentally the same across organisms as diverse as primates and flowering plants. The male strategy is one of quantity and competition. In mammals and birds, this manifests itself as the individual male engaging in pursuit of the female. In plants, this manifests itself as the gametes (pollen) competing for geograph…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 01:07 AM
2

Even starting your own political party is near impossible because it costs like 10 grand. That doesn't seem like an exorbitant amount of money to me.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 09:45 AM
2

And then all the Canadian women whore themselves out to the American guys cause we played Mr. high-status hero/victor.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 09:43 AM
1

Because people generally have standards. In much the same way that women prefer white men in the dating game, men prefer white women in the marriage game. This is also the main reason why you hear over and over again that "foreign/black/Asian girls are so much better". They are of lower social status, and committing to them will give your progeny lower social status. To maintain equilibrium, they make up in other places (sex, working out, demureness, etc.) Men generally don't care about status w…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 08:49 AM
2

Does it speak to the fact that iq tests mean nothing, those people in Africa have been fighting poverty and lacking education their entire lives, and that people of African descent exist in the USA and clearly didn't bring down their average versus places with smaller African-descended populations? Another good example of the dramatic decline in posting quality this sub has seen in the last few months. The average black IQ in America is 85. That's the most generous estimate, and American blacks …
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 08:41 AM
-1

The current view of anthropology is that Europeans evolved light eyes (and maybe hair) because there was a huge deficit in males, enabling paleolithic European males to engage in sexual selection. This was HUGE, because the almost universal norm in nature is that only males undergo sexual selection, while females generally are able to reproduce. Cold climate and low carrying capacity of Europe meant more dependence on (male) hunting, meaning that males could afford to provide for fewer women, an…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 07:43 AM
3

Looks like the surgeries are working then
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 07:36 AM
4

In theory, it could be easily corrected. In practice, it can't be due to the current political climate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 07:30 AM
6

He is very attractive, tall, educated, earns a lot of money, and is an all around great guy. Is he white? And how often were the previous guys you slept with white? Only asking this because of your username
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/15 07:24 AM
4

and the men you can get to commit as a woman This isn't true, because SMV is by definition "sexual". If you're a woman, your SMV is almost entirely your physical features. SMV isn't what's important for a woman though, MMV (marriage market value) is
/r/RedPillWomen05/01/15 03:48 AM
1

That's because sex is only a competition between men, and not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 11:14 PM
5

It said that it significantly decreased cognitive empathic ability in women who underwent fetal testosterone priming but not in those women who didn't. The women who underwent the priming already had brains that were more 'male' than the average woman. I think this is exciting, it potentially could mean a discrete difference between two fundamentally different types of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 01:05 PM
1

If your eyes start welling up when your girlfriend cheats on you, you probably aren't. If you cry when a family member dies, pretty normal.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 07:49 AM
1

The olfactory's actually workin fine, but thanks for the confirmation
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 05:45 AM
1

Well, that's why we call them generalizations, and not facts.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 02:27 AM
7

women weren't dating them anyway, so no loss there Women are losing. You assume that female utility from a man is only derived by his "dateability". In much the same way that men aren't valuable solely but their "fuckability", men also aren't valuable solely by dateability. High status masculine men would be very fuckable. Medium status somewhat beta men would be dateable. Omega males would be used solely for validation, and if too undesriable, "creep bragging" (omg, this total creep was so into…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/15 02:26 AM
1

Its not even about being dark triad in my opinion, it's like a magician revealing his secret. I personally think that most things on TRP are obvious enough to not be worth "hiding".
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 12:03 AM
1

I laugh whenever i see a dont talk about redpill to others. Firstly, this post isn't meant to convey that message. The message is "convincing people is not your job, and brings no benefit to you." Secondly, feminism doesn't keep men down, men keep men down. Males have been the competitive gender since literally before vertebrates ever existed. Feminism was not possible without men. High status men are advantaged by feminism. Take off your "bro" goggles.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/15 12:01 AM
2

Women don't seek sex for inherent pleasure, the way men do. Men have more sensation in their genitals (glans is several times larger than the clit), higher sex drives, and 20x more testosterone than women, typically. They seek sex, while women are receptive to the males who seek sex, this is true among both birds and mammals. Women typically have sex to acquire relationships/status. This is why most men are much less picky than women. For men, sex is an issue of masculine identity, proof of weal…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 11:54 PM
0

Just like calling yourself "redpill" is ignorant as fuck as well. Are you actually going to go out in the world and say that? Of course not, dummy. Is this your first day here? No, I don't "identify" myself with labels when I'm socially engaging with people. That's feminine. Saying you're a "nerd", or a "foodie" (word makes me wanna vomit), or most identifiers annoys the shit out of me. But when I meet people, I label them without hesitation. What if I agree with Reps on certain issues, Dems on …
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 11:23 PM
4

Women tend to seek sex for pleasure, not to establish a pecking order or play social games in the way men do, For men, sex is an issue of masculine identity, proof of wealth and status, and a means to establish themselves as dominant and powerful. For women, sex is just sex. ...is today opposite day, cause I didn't get the memo
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 11:18 PM
2

There is no such thing as "dark triad" Its a catchphrase. Like I said earlier, I only use labels because they're convenient. Dark triad is a label. I think some people have a problem with this label because it SOUNDS a little catchy, therefore it must just be "edgy teenagers trying to look cool and shit!!1" When I say dark triad, I mean someone who is naturally inclined to pursue his self interest. There is a potential life path which leads to the optimization of your genetic potential. Most peo…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 05:33 PM
1

Time is money If I need someone to help me with my nuclear rocket physics homework, I'll probably opt not to ask the black girl who grew up in Harlem and is here on scholarship I could look at her "individual situation" and evaluate her thoroughly, and maybe even find out that she's pretty smart, but why the fuck would I do that? It's stupid.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 05:24 PM
1

That some do what, exactly? That there are some women who desire sex more than some men? Sure, there are some legitimately asexual men. If we're talking spectrum-wise, with inherent desire of sex as the variable, I'd say with confidence that there are NO women who value sex as much as the top 5th percentile of men does.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 05:20 PM
2

ctrl+f "leftist" replace all "cultural marxist"
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 05:16 PM
1

well, yeah. I didn't say that wasn't retarded as fuck.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 05:16 PM
1

For someone new to TRP, that validation is important. I'm not even new dude, sometimes labels are just fucking CONVENIENT that's why we use 'em
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 05:12 PM
5

Based on the label Noculum, I would assume the individual is more likely than average to have the following traits: male white not black likes Latin likes philosophy scores INTP/J on MBTI tests has an IQ >= 125 Also possibly has an atypically flat butt. Only said that because I know a little bit of Spanish.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 03:31 PM
7

Once you label yourself people can put you in a neat little box and pack you away without addressing the substance. This is a pretty trite point that reads like it's been taken from a new-age blog written by a 19 year old. I don't even mean for that to be offensive. Your post, ironically, apes feminism. All the super leftist "egalitarian" ideals of the last few decades put emphasis on the harmfulness of stereotypes, and the sanctity of the individual. Stereotypes, labels, associations, are all e…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 03:24 PM
6

Males who desired females had more kids Females who desired males had no relative difference in offspring number The trait is likely sex linked
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 12:47 PM
7

I don't think anyone doubts that the transactional model of sex is a reality. Except half of reddit, because apparently "women want sex just as much as men"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/15 12:44 PM
1

This guy isn't beta, the way he handled it was quite alpha except for the crying part reread what you just wrote
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 12:38 PM
1

and why you should never get married
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 12:24 PM
2

it is simply the ideological opposite of Islam: a faith based system. A faith-based system which stems out of intellectual development and the western rule of law.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 11:36 PM
4

It seems to me the Arabs are more concerned with religious dominance than they are civilizational progress. European civilization may be superior now, but the sheer "bigotry and piousness" of Arab civilization may win out on superiority in the end. Intellectual development is useless if it leads to PC science and feminism. Muslims have lots of kids and obedient wives.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 09:51 PM
3

The fact that certain races have higher average IQ than others indicates that in some parts of the world higher IQ was needed to survive (eg: the cold climate of europe with little arable land) whilst in places like Africa with abundant natural resources, and warm, fertile land, survival was easier so sexually selecting for intelligence was not as necessary. I don't think Europe's cold climate sexually selected for intelligent men. I think it naturally selected for intelligent men. The natural s…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 09:45 PM
1

I thought the "eating the male" thing was mostly myth or overexaggerated.
/r/askTRP02/01/15 12:22 PM
6

conspiracy theory That term doesn't mean what you think it means
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 12:00 PM
34

Same thing happened when America occupied Germany. There were even a whole bunch of mulatto children born to black US soldiers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_Babies Women indeed have a very "fluid" sexuality. How's that for a PC euphemism?
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 11:54 AM
3

I can see it now /r/asktrp: "Plate pooped while doing anal is this a shittest??!?"
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 08:54 AM
22

As bad as men need Sex-- women need a man's attention. Luckily for them there's the internet for that
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 08:49 AM
2

but don't hate the player, hate the game, player I don't see any players in that story except for the men she got fucked by
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 05:56 AM
17

This is why I think TRP is inherently toxic for a woman to consciously acknowledge. One of two things happens, in my experience: She consciously realizes that she is "superior" to men. This results in generally masculine, spoiled, unappealing behavior. Think of Elaine Benez from Seinfeld. Could also result in bro talk. She consciously realizes that she desire men who are superior to her, and that she is happiest when in a position of inferiority, or a "slave" role. This is a tough pill of cognit…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 05:51 AM
4

Between this and the "Paul Blart, mall cop" in the OP, we've touched on some good synchronicity. Except not really. It's just that being a chump naturally leads to IRL personifying Kevin James' roles.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/15 01:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter