TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throw-away-today Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by throw-away-today on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Not sure about your question, but I remember reading that before it was "wereman" and "woman." "Man" without a prefix therefore meant either male or female. We see this in "were-wolf," man-wolf.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 07:17 PM
4

We had two+ teenage pregnancies per graduating class- Silicon Valley, nationally top ranked school. Kids can fuck up anywhere and some people have different life goals.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 08:31 AM
1

What was it?
/r/MensRights21/05/14 12:59 AM
2

Check the article comments.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 04:13 AM
0

They're going to make that association because it makes sense. "here from /MRA!!" followed by a comment invasion from people mocking the article and site. The best thing to do is stay out of the immature comments.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 08:58 PM
-1

That's my point. We don't want to be associated with those comments, which are really frequent. Those comments all came after the reddit army comment, directing people to our subreddit. Adding to the mass voice of trolls makes it so ignorant people make connections and assume we are on par with them, even though were a legitimate group.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 08:26 PM
-1

"o rly so now womyn cant rite articles? fuk off u sexist peace of shit" -ionleyfukblackcoks "You sound like a fatass, Diana. Gotta be honest." - Red Pillar "I think society should pay us to be females." - Men should die "judging by that picture you got beside your name though.you should be glad to be raped at least your ugly fatass is getting some" - DasItMan Trolling other websites doesn't look good. If we join our voices with the ones above, it becomes hard for outsiders to distinguish us and …
/r/MensRights16/03/14 07:37 PM
33

Guys, can you not comment on the source? You can comment here. The whole "LE REDDIT ARMY HAS ARRIVED" thing is obnoxious as fuck.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:39 PM
1

The difference is really obvious. If the government censors you, you cannot speak at all. Ever. Or you risk their action against you. It's a lot more serious than a blogger deciding you should take your opinions elsewhere. Bloggers, and Facebook, and other people have a right to decide what is posted on their website. It's theirs. Take this off of the Internet and it's like screaming "MEN ARE CUNTS" while standing in someone's yard. They are totally right to kick you out. That's not fucking cens…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:01 PM
1

It's not citizens, though. It's a business providing a free service along with terms and conditions. It's against their rules to post hate speech. You might be against this, but that's their right. They're not obligated to give everybody a free platform to talk, especially when they're trying to sell ads and make money. At the moment, you're disagreeing with people for being fair and following the rules. Pages that were misogynistic were removed, it is equal for misandry pages to be removed as w…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:13 AM
2

Freedom of speech doesn't mean you're obligated to give them a platform to speak. Facebook has it's rules and hate speech is against them. Reporting it is fair. They can go make a blog or tumblr. So many people on this thread seem to be missing this. This isn't the government, this is a business. Saying this is censorship is the same as saying being banned from Club Penguin is against the first amendment. Jesus.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:34 PM
2

That is a ridiculous assumption and I feel really bad for you that those are the only mothers you've ever known.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:55 PM
5

I think we have to be especially careful in this sub not to seem sexist because of our goal in raising awareness for men's rights. I'd hate an on the fence bystander to see a comment like that and go "ew! These mras are sexists", which is unfortunately how we are labeled already by some due to their own sexism. It's just really frustrating to see on my end, but I understand you were human and your intent might not have been reflected well. I'm usually more volatile when I'm on this sub because i…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 02:36 AM
2

That's why I said "don't usually" because there are always going to be children you have to change things up for. From my experience with children, I've noticed they love doing things if it's a game and will do it more than if they're forced to do it. I don't think forcing them to do things will always open their worldview or make them better people. Usually, it will probably make them dislike that thing, instead.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 02:30 AM
3

You can make it fun, though. Work ethic starts young. I honestly believe two year olds can be responsible for their messes, eight year olds their school-work, and teens their own hobbies and interests. Were you pushed?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:56 PM
14

/r/raisedbynarcissists Seriously.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:40 PM
13

Makes you wonder about the men in their lives, huh? Poor sods.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:35 PM
-2

And apparently most women force their children into doing things they don't want to? Where did that generalization come from and how does it make the world easier to navigate? It was sexist. It wasn't based in fact or proof, and was said to insult a group of people based on gender. Stoping that is exactly what this subreddit is about! Jesus Christ, people.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:34 PM
8

You don't see women getting this? How many women do you actually know? I was totally agreeing with you up until then. I'm a woman. Don't degrade someone based on their sex. Seriously, wtf? We are all here to point out issues with doing that exact thing to men, don't turn around and do it to women. What is your generalization even based off of?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:32 PM
1

People don't usually respond well to being forced into doing things. Children especially can be unreceptive to being forced, and it can make otherwise enjoyable things a chore.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 08:28 PM
1

It ended better. I always skip to the end to see if it ends happier when deciding whether to keep reading.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 09:06 AM
2

That's how my boyfriend feels too! Which is why we take turns :)
/r/MensRights21/02/14 10:10 PM
5

I'm not a feminist, though. So what you just wrote is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:26 PM
7

What. I like my boyfriend to be dominant in bed. Slapping, biting, pulling. Not because I'm going to hold it against him, not because I hate him, and not because it's what "real men" do. It's because sometimes I feel a little shameful about sex. About enjoying it and having it. Giving him the control lets me pretend in my head that I'm a good girl and just honestly there was nothing I could do to stop him. My favorite phrase of his is "good girl". It's not because I think men are bad or naughty,…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 07:01 PM
8

To be fair both sides grope in the dark. Sex education in America, at least, is lacking. When my boyfriend couldn't get hard once, I was upset because I thought I wasn't good enough/attractive enough/whatever. It was just the first time he'd been sick while we'd been together and he just didn't feel in the mood. I pressured him, like the immature idiot I was, and we had very disappointing sex (the only time it has been disappointing). Obviously I know better know, because we talked about it. But…
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:50 PM
18

I was going to say! My boyfriend expects me to gyrate and sometimes he'll stop in the middle to tease me, so I'm literally doing all the work on my back. Of course, I go on top too. But I don't like it as much. Not because I'm lazy. But because it doesn't feel as intimate. When I'm on top, it's fucking. I'm sitting upright, grabbing my tits, while he slaps my ass. When he's on top, I'm stroking his back, my thighs wrapped around him, while he kisses my neck. Big difference. Not in the amount of …
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:41 PM
3

Tom boy was most certainly a badge of pride amongst girls I grew up with. It basically meant they were friends with guys and therefore cracked the cootie code.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:40 AM
0

Generalizations aren't helpful or realistic, they weaken your argument. Girls are more likely to show feminine and masculine traits without critique, whereas men are not. More likely. I mean, look at the "metro" culture of California. I know men that use leave in conditioners, Chapstick, moisturizers, and foundation and no one gives them shit for it. That's pretty feminine to me, personally. I know guys that talk about chick flicks, shopping, and home interior design and no ones questions their …
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:39 AM
6

Actually, they can catch flak for looking "butch" or "dyke-like". Short hair, baggy clothes, ect. It's still not as bad in most areas but I've see it happen.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:31 AM
34

It's called leering. Are they honestly so uneducated they make up terms for words that already exist?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:43 AM
5

I totally agree that the tweet is really vague and not constructive at all. I also don't understand why /u/everyone_hates_you_ has received any up-votes at all. But, I still disagree with you about the joke being a mistake but acceptable. I think it's a symptom of a societal attitude that lends itself to ignoring male victims. Maybe I'll be clearer if I flip it better. The Headline: Man Allegedly Slices Woman's Clitoris After Accusing Her Of Molesting His 2-Year-Old Son The hook: Any way you cut…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:02 PM
9

I think it's kinda funny in a way. I was close to unsubscribing a while back because of some awfully sexist comments. (I decided to stay because I still passionately care about men's rights) Yet, here I am about to defend this sub, because I totally understood why this was posted here. I'm female but I still felt pain down there in sympathy. I just don't understand the lack of empathy to write that sentence as the hook. It would be like writing "one girl is not gonna need lube tonight, the blood…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 11:48 AM
7

Normally I try not to read these threads because I get ghost pains in sympathy. I'm sad now I've read them and know my boyfriend receives less pleasure for no reason. I can hardly go up to his parents and ask why they did it, either. I just don't understand :(
/r/MensRights01/01/14 06:46 PM
32

I was massively downvoted in another subreddit tonight for defending /r/MensRights. It's not just SRS, its a large portion of the reddit community and I just can't fathom it.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 07:24 AM
4

Of course! I didn't mean to downplay the possible side effects. I just didn't have to find a gynecologist, have a bunch of tests, and wait a month for the pills to kick in. It was about thirty minutes of my time, not the ordeal she is pretending it is.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:43 PM
13

it showed how completely out of touch Rebecca is with the real world. On that note, she is making the pill sound far more complex that it is. I went to my general doctor, listened to a lecture about the possible side-effects and the benefits for about thirty minutes, and now pick up my prescription once a month. Oh the hardship. And, the "feels better for you" (with the bunny ears and everything, ugh) pissed me off. My partner had issues finding ones that fit (we tried, trust me) and we just cou…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:18 AM
3

We have Romeo and Juliet laws in California to protect couples when one person ages out of being underaged.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:43 PM
16

It won't surprise me if that was the reason. Why not? She said one of the reasons. I don't think she was solely promoted because she was a woman. You shouldn't undermine her like that.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 04:27 AM
1

Don't worry, I still love you :)
/r/MensRights28/10/13 08:31 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 12:34 AM
1

Limited is an adjective; it would have been fine without anything.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:06 AM
1

Like I said, it's already public and a video was posted and spread around. Would you rather everyone spread misinformation around or saw the pictures and had a better context? They were drunk (which was their choice) and it sucks (their bad), but the people in their community already saw the video and photos before we even heard about it. Screenshots on reddit is the least of their problems right now. And seeing the photos is educational for us and prevents gut reactions like "he's a rapist". It…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:37 PM
1

Smiling, grabbing his head and pulling him towards her, and posing with him afterwards for photos are all important. I understand privacy and normally I agree, but in the case of "I didn't want it and it was rape", I think we need to see the body language and facial expressions to get a better understanding of what happened. I think someone else mentioned above that with the blurred out faces and the word "rape" underneath, people will assume incorrect things. I'm all for privacy, but this case …
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:37 PM
11

Seeing her smiling face is pretty important to helping prove she is a big fat liar.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 12:05 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 06:11 PM
4

I'm of the belief this stuff needs attention. It happens and often doesn't get reported on. I'm glad this crazy lady and attorney are now on the Internet for all to see.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:55 PM
5

Did you read the article? What the young guy had to say about the incident was really heartbreaking.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 10:25 PM
15

Interesting to read how a lot of the comments realize the hypocrisy. While the case is disheartening and downright unfair, the comments kinda give me a little hope. I remember reading stuff like "bet they enjoyed it" and the like not too long ago on a similar story.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 10:48 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter