~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Actual (NOT SATIRE) HuffPo headline: "My P(ussy) Is Better Than Your P(atriarchy)!" -- The case for “cheating back” as a means toward empowering women and to expose and challenge fragile masculinity (archive)Even considering the validity of an eye-for-an-eye revenge in these issues (which I do not condone nor advocate), what happens if the girl discovers that the lad hasn't really cheated on her as she previously thought? Would she graciously concede that the chap has the right to "cheat back"? I know a couple of cases like that, where the woman had what she thought were indisputable proof of her SO cheating, only to discover, quite a bit later, that the evidence was not evidence at all and that she… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/17 05:11 PM |
| 2 | "I had sex with 25 men at a party and now I'm pregnant"... but it's the men's faultI don't think so. I say we are different, but we also have diversity in each group. And what mostly concerns me is the "full responsibility and accountability for their actions, just like men" part. If that is not taken in count, yes, there lies the double standard. As for what motivates men and women or how both take their approach to relationships will have to do more with education, methinks. As societies evolve and change, you see that behaviour patterns also flow in different ways, some exp… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/15 02:10 PM |
| 1 | "I had sex with 25 men at a party and now I'm pregnant"... but it's the men's faultI disagree. Not in that we are different, but that your answer addresses what I said. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/15 08:36 PM |
| 4 | "I had sex with 25 men at a party and now I'm pregnant"... but it's the men's faultAgree. And that's not just archaic, but misogynistic as well. Women can choose to have casual sex without being labeled nor devalued. Just like men, with full responsibility and accountability for their actions, just like men. Or not? | /r/MensRights | 13/04/15 05:48 PM |
| 0 | I'm not just worried about young women on campus, I'm worried about my sons too. Campus rape hysteria scares feminist.I’ve heard advocates emphasize that only a tiny percentage of rape accusations are fallacious. I believe that. But the sexual landscape is becoming brutally hard to navigate. We are well beyond the notion that a stranger must pop out of an alley for it to be considered an attack. As our definition of consensual sex continues to morph, some young women could interpret certain unfortunate sexual encounters as “rape” when they may just have been stupid, risky, unpleasant and regrettable. In this hy… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/14 08:02 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionHi, and thanks again. In this issue we're all speculating regarding both Mr. Vince and Ms. Wyatt. According to both, they either got separated in 1984 or before (different statements in this matter, which sounds quite odd to me). Their child was born in 1981. When they got separated, their child was either two or three years old and they were both on welfare. Neither of them were attending college, and they were in charge of two children. The oldest kid wasn't Mr. Vince's child and was, instead,… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 02:00 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionThanks for your comments. English is a beautiful language. Reading and posting in Reddit helps me a lot in my unpaved learning road. I think this case is one of principles. If it's a case of child support and he neglected his duties towards his son, then the court should calculate how much he owes according to his income back then, plus minor adjustments for inflation, I guess. But I guess this might be a case of a spouse feeling entitled to earnings that the former partner had long after the di… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/14 03:56 AM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionBoth parents were on welfare. The cost of raising the child was assumed by the State. AFAIK, she didn't pay for costs of raising their kid, and both parents were broke. While he was broke, she was entitled to a part of what he had, which was zero, null, nothing. As for shared responsibility and the time consuming part of the argument, we should agree that parents should get some form of shared custody of their children. This way, both parents can give their best to their sons and daughters, be i… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 09:33 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionRe-read the articles about this (google them). They had one child, a son. OTOH, yes, her claims are unfair. If he feels an obligation, a duty, that is to his son, not to her ex-wife. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 08:53 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionOf those ten years of child support, the lad was broke for... Let's see. The kid was born in 1981. Vince started his new project in 1995, when the kid was 14 years old. Vince wasn't successful until 1997. If he wasn't paying child support at all until 1999, the court should consider how much he was making from 1995 until 1999. When BOTH parents were practically broke, they were on welfare, hence no child support. In any case, I don't see how those 4 years of Child Support amount to 2 million pou… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 08:47 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionI can't see why she is entitled to any of his money either, money he made long after they got divorced. Why is THAT view a mysoginistic one? Why should any person, male or female, be entitled to claim even a tiny part of a fortune his or her ex spouse made long after their divorce? I reckon that Mr. Vince should help his son, though (college, job, etc.), but I guess this is not being discussed right now. On the other hand, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but calling me a mysoginist is not knowing m… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 08:41 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionI misread "It's appalling". Huh. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 08:36 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionSome other source, with other bits of interesting information | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 04:37 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionTechnically is 15 years, not 18, since they've been together for the kid's first 3 years. £2m for 15 years is a bit more than £11,111 per month for child support. And that's only child support, since he has no obligation towards her. How would you justify that considering how he lived until he could make money? And since the article does not mention child support, how is her claim justified in any other way? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 04:17 PM |
| 1 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionWhy is he being nasty by saying she's not entitled to any part of the fortune he made LONG after they divorced? I can not see what's nasty in that. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 04:07 PM |
| 7 | A couple divorce in 1992, the wife has 2 children with another man. The first husband is poor and lives in a van for 3 years. In 1995 he starts a wind turbine business and it ends up worth £57 millionThat was more than 20 years ago (that they had their child). When they divorced, the guy lived in an old ambulance. As far as I know, each divorcee gives as he/she can and as the law says, according to what they have/earn. Get the point? Not to be dismissed is that when they were together, the lad cared for a child that she had with a previous partner. It's in the law that child support has to take in count what the parents earn and the living standard the children were enjoying until the divorc… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/14 12:49 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter