TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwaway-1877 Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by throwaway-1877 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Do you have any further resources about the differences in races and their r and K selection level?
/r/TheRedPill28/08/21 05:24 PM
3

RP was a praexology 5-10 years ago. Today it’s an ideology that counters social movements that emasculate men and potentially destabilize society. RP is no less an ideology than feminism in 2021.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/21 01:32 AM
1

That’s entirely the point. You lead people like you would a horse with a carrot for sex. But you make it difficult and restricted to obtain. You then make it seem like it’s some surreal experience everyone is having except you. This is what fuels many parts of the consumer economy and markets.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/21 02:24 AM
2

It doesn’t. That’s just ecofascist and elitist propaganda. The real problems are Urbanization and population density.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 08:08 PM
2

As intended. None of this is by accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 04:18 PM
2

Civil unrest.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 08:38 PM
1

Dualistic mating is specifically practiced by women who both have a genetic selection for it and early upbringing (paternal insecurity) effect, along with society pushing it. Society has also replaced the direct functions of men (protection and provision) with a purely transactional sexual one, while leaving the others to government power. Males today are also far less capable of those two today than ever before. There is some credence to the 'r vs K" hypothesis applied to humans too but as dist…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 05:32 AM
3

Yup mostly monogamous with maybe very slight polyamory tendencies (like cheating or a male shortage leading to higher status men taking more wives in tribes). Folks inclined towards polyamory usually have a genetic basis for doing so, it’s the way their lineages survived in the past so they’ll continue that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 04:58 PM
20

Shhhh you weren’t supposed to know the secret about most dating advice
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 11:49 PM
10

Postmodern feminism has perfectly served its purpose and achieved the goals it has intended to. It has: - Dismantled the nuclear family to create broken children that can be propagandized easier - Emasculated men - Made women the propaganda enforcer of choice - Made women into labor capital instead of focusing on progenitors - Destabilized and divided society - Lowered birthrates - Helped create the casual sex industry and funnel - With increased unhappiness, helps pay big pharma for meds - Made…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 06:42 PM
2

Here’s a little secret: genetics dictate default sexual strategy. If a woman’s female ancestors (like her mom) had more reproductive success with casual sex, guess what she’s gonna prefer? Cultural influence also plays a significant role, especially when it comes to incentivizing some things and deincentivizing others.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 05:09 PM
1

No it isn’t proof, it’s simply deductive reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:33 PM
1

When a higher proportion of your sensory input is visual I think at the very least it’s plausible that you’ll be drawn to more visual stimuli.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:05 AM
1

Men have higher visual capabilities in the occipital lobe due to higher visual needs from our hunter gatherer past. Strong visual ability is needed to size up a threat or accurately hunt for the next meal.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:01 AM
2

Stop spending so much time on looksmax. You’re literally repeating word for word stuff said there. Come up with your own original ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 07:48 PM
3

Agree with your statement there. Those 3 countries really fucked shit up in any way they could.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 06:42 AM
2

Well for one, if sex is restricted soon to come it will be done purely by proxy rather than a cultural revolution. Gen Z men do not have the willpower or fight in them to go out of their way to enforce these things. Keep in mind, these cultures also succeeded because of their focus on virtue, loyalty, community, and tradition, all of which can also be connected with their attitudes towards most intimate act of sex. The only way I can see this happening is if Gen Z men have been weakened and psyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 02:43 AM
4

The internet also plays an accelerationist role in trends like these. My guess is it will increase the speed of this by a factor of 1/3 (or decrease the total years as such). So instead of 100 years, it would take approximately 66 years, so 2030s-40s
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/21 02:00 AM
1

Social and cultural programming, like most of the things in the dating scene today.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/21 10:30 PM
19

No. I’m a man and I’ve argued with many “men” here who are more irrational than any woman I’ve met in my life. They simply LARP as logical and rational to impose higher moral authority brownie points, when in reality they’re just applying their confirmation bias everywhere, and sometimes even find research to support it. Their arguments use common platitudes that crumble like Jenga towers when held under scrutiny. It’s no wonder to me that men are not as respected as they once were, especially w…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 12:42 AM
1

That’s actually you. You have failed to provide proof for any of your quite outlandish claims on here, despite repeated asking by myself and multiple other members. You just resort to downvoting and “haha you’re wrong bro”. You also disappear when called out for your lack of due diligence, projecting much?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 06:48 AM
5

Far far far worse
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 08:09 PM
0

Crazies sure project a lot by calling others crazy. Absolutely pathetic. You cannot even refute a single thing I’ve said. Is this the quality of the debate here? Low level hamstering with intellectual dishonesty? Put the fucking evidence here before you claim “muh evidence”.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:24 PM
5

Yes and this gender war has a very special purpose to it. Bonus points if you guess correctly.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:19 PM
1

Absolute foolishness. The best genes indicated in the Paleolithic environment that you were both a good provider and protector. A tall broad shouldered man with moderate musculature and masculine face would have the highest hunting reputation (provider) and be able to protect best. Tribal structure varied vastly, some who take on a more collective role in protection/provision whereas others it’s an individual role (especially in northern climates). Are you also the one who couldn’t hold up the 8…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 07:17 PM
0

EDIT: Proof for above is you going through the trouble of downvoting all my responses on a “no downvote” subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 05:57 AM
0

Prove me wrong...oh wait you can’t. While you work at the salt mines (which I own) , I’ll enjoy reading my literature in the woods on a warm afternoon. I’m living rent free in your head right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 05:45 AM
1

I also recommend you delete your string of responses here. It has done next to nothing to contribute to the discussion at hand and makes you look like a bumbling fool who cannot defend views. This would be the best move for your reputation’s sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 07:02 PM
2

You’ve failed to come at or even disprove anything I’ve said. You’re even failing to provide sources when asked. Absolutely pathetic. This place is called Purple Pill DEBATE, not Purple Pill Hamstering. Stick to the community chat for now, seems like the right and only place for you. If you live a polygynous lifestyle, don’t take this as me shaming you (live as you please), but you just aren’t gonna find too much in the literature to support it evolutionarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 06:30 PM
3

Possibly. Where are you getting the age 15 number from? Where are you also getting the Y chromosome bottleneck beyond 10Kya from? Males fought amongst themselves since puberty and wiped out entire paternal lineages. Males also suffer from immunosuppression as a result of genes and hormones. Hunter gatherers are mostly monogamous but sometimes slightly polygynous depending on resources, climate, and male fatality rates. Plus most, if not all, surviving hunter gatherer groups exist in warmer clima…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 06:14 PM
2

I hope you do realize that much more males died from intrasexual violence, patrilineal killing practices, hunting accidents, and disease (look up the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis and even the significance of ancient tattooing rituals ). This can easily explain much of the bottleneck before agriculture. Plus, there just wasn’t much its disparity in resources in most hunter gatherer society to justify large scale polygyny in the absence of the other factors I listed, and the smaller sexual…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 04:29 PM
0

It’s intentional. The government definitely feeds into this. They have depopulation intentions. They also love feminized men who won’t oppose authority especially when they’re pacified by porn and video games. Their goal is also to make women and men so repulsive to each other that people would never consider mating with each other and so far it’s working. Huge birth rate declines in the west.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/21 06:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter