TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwaway1231697 Archive

View 6 posts and 474 comments by throwaway1231697 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
61

There are articles on declining birth rates and single women, and these articles usually frame it as men being the issue - not good enough etc. And then when it comes to the male loneliness epidemic, it’s also framed as men being the issue. Pretty standard stuff, whenever something goes wrong it’s men’s fault apparently.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:58 PM
0

Yes? Feminists are all for men having a vasectomy if they don’t want a baby, but suddenly one abortion is too much? If you don’t want to get a forced abortion, don’t have unprotected sex???
/r/MensRights04/04/26 08:29 PM
8

The thing I don’t get is that “sex is the same as consenting to parenthood” applies only for men. When two people have unprotected sex, one party can choose to stop the pregnancy, the other side can’t. Why not? Let both sides have the option to terminate.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 08:27 PM
2

Every time I see the news about someone being saved from a fire etc, it’s always saved by a man. Not all men, but always a man saving the day.
/r/MensRights04/04/26 08:25 PM
3

Apply it to race and it’s racism, apply it to women and it’s sexism. But somehow it’s okay generalising all men…
/r/MensRights04/04/26 08:23 PM
1

It’s well established that men are judged more harshly both by the public and by the court Haven’t seen a paper controlling for children, but I doubt that would change the results.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 11:13 AM
0

You can’t be charged with misandry. Only misogyny can legally constitute a hate crime. Men aren’t a protected class legally.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:13 AM
1

I’m confused. I said majority of women have met a bear, and you disagree. I said majority of women haven’t seen a bear, and you disagree. I said men are terrible and you disagree, I said men aren’t terrible and you disagree. Sounds like you’re just arguing for the sake of arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 04:48 AM
2

Ah, so we’re on the same page? The majority of women have not met a bear, and men are not terrible? Glad we agree then, sorry for the misunderstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 03:33 AM
2

So that isn’t what you’re implying? So the majority of women haven’t met a bear? The majority of men in your life are not terrible people?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 04:37 PM
6

Have you seen what people have done for money? People do horrible things for money, including sex trafficking, murder etc. Greed for either is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 03:17 PM
2

Wasn’t aware that majority of women have met a bear. Am sorry that you think the majority of men in your life, like your dad etc are all terrible people. Hopefully you meet better men in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 03:00 PM
1

Yup, people who aren’t fit to be parents shouldn’t be parents, glad you are self-aware! Plenty of other things in life to do
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 02:54 PM
2

Feminists spaces are heavily policed, there’s no free speech there and you can’t express opposing views.
/r/MensRights29/03/26 04:18 PM
2

To be fair if you think having kids are about having tangible “benefits”, it’s best you don’t become a parent anyway. Having a kid doesn’t “benefit”men or women, it just costs women more in terms of physically carrying the child. Statistically it is more likely to cost the men more financially. Either way you shouldn’t raise a kid with the aim of getting something in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:17 PM
2

Did you lose any rights. Uh, yes? Are women okay with being forced to pay child support for rape babies, or forced to fight in a war? Also, it’s not semantic because sexual assault carries a lesser punishment. Are you okay if men can’t be charged with rape in the same countries then? Essentially reducing the jail term. It’s like every time a man kills a woman, he can only be charged with manslaughter instead of murder, and only women can be charged with murder. Is that just semantic? Therefore o…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 04:00 PM
3

Actually, according to research, an analysis of 85 studies show that pro-male bias in hiring have diminished or reversed, while pro-female bias (nursing etc) have remained unchanged. For example, women are favoured more heavily in STEM So you’re right, we don’t have equality in the workforce, women have it better (in first world countries). If you’re from a third world country then yes, men have advantages in the workforce. Otherwise please recognise your own advantages.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 06:04 PM
2

Or perhaps OP is suggesting that men can build a real connection with a greater variety of people, as long as there’s a “good vibe”? Are women a lot more picky and need a lot more criteria to build meaningful connections?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 05:59 PM
2

Exactly, men are choosing to go their own way etc and getting attacked for it, getting called incels etc. Don’t really get it. And the autonomy thing too. In countries like Australia, where they are discussing curfews for all men, this is a real threat. Or for about 4+ billion people (half the world’s population) who live in countries like UK, Singapore, China etc where legally women cannot be charged with rape, male victims there have little autonomy too. So are victims of statutory rape or rap…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 05:54 PM
3

Exactly. And silence and lack of activism applies to both genders, so OP is saying that women around the world also support rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 03:18 PM
5

If men should pay more for women, shouldn’t they also earn more? Equal wages come with equal spending, if you want a certain group to spend more you have to pay them more.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 03:15 PM
3

It is frustrating, but know that you are making a difference in whatever way you can and don’t be brought down by others :’))
/r/MensRights24/03/26 03:14 PM
1

Women like this make me question if they can understand math. About 200 million people have died in war in the past 100 years meanwhile about 15000 have died in domestic abuse cases. Shes off by more than 10,000 times.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/03/26 01:22 PM
1

Men are also women’s biggest saviors lol. The number of women saved by male firefighters far outweigh the number saved by female firefighters. The entirety of women in Ukraine can thank their male citizens for defending the country.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 01:18 PM
6

good question, although I think the answer to complaints about segregation or racism shouldn’t be “why are you there?” Hateful comments or discrimination shouldn’t exist in any space, social media should be for everyone not just women.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 11:51 AM
3

I don’t think the standard is that insufficient evidence results in you being guilty, more that sufficient evidence of you making a false accusation makes you guilty.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 04:46 PM
2

Are women-only diversity programs overlooking men? Yeah pretty much they’re made to exclude men.
/r/MensRights23/03/26 04:44 PM
2

This is terrible, I’m so sorry. Thanks for raising awareness
/r/MensRights23/03/26 04:43 PM
1

I like how on one hand they think dating a 20+ year old woman is pedophilia, and on the other hand they think women mature faster. Which is it? Should we treat 20+ year old women like immature kids who shouldn’t be trusted, or are they adults?
/r/MensRights23/03/26 04:43 PM
5

A lot of people throw this “only 2% of accusations” are false around. So does that mean that 98% of accusations result in a guilty conviction? Basically if you accuse someone, you are guaranteed a conviction? What do victims have to be afraid of then, if they are guaranteed success? Turns out if you check the sources for the 2% of false accusations, the definition is that the accuser is criminally charged in 2% of cases. Only if they confess, or there is video evidence are these considered a fal…
/r/MensRights23/03/26 04:42 PM
1

Both are equally not ok
/r/MensRights21/03/26 06:43 PM
6

It’s tough because the rape victim might not even want the child in the first place? So being forced to keep the child or pay child support is like a lose-lose situation. And yeah, it’s also a tough situation to tackle legally regarding blanket laws :’)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 05:05 PM
9

I think he’s referring to the fact that male victims of rape or statutory rape are legally required to pay child support to their rapists if a child is born, they don’t have the autonomy to choose an abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 04:39 PM
7

“I believe her” and “we all do” is not downplaying the severity? And how do you know these comments and likes are all men? Did you check? Are people legally required to put their real identity on the internet. Regardless of who they are, are such comments really acceptable? Is it okay to comment on a post about ICE shooting some random woman: “I believe him.”? Is it okay to like that comment?
/r/MensRights14/03/26 04:32 PM
9

Wait, so lesbians are less tolerant of each other’s bullshit? So two women in relationship results in more bullshit? What is she even talking about
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 01:10 PM
9

I mean there are thousands of likes on these. Do you know it’s okay to joke or like comments about killing women or racial minorities?
/r/MensRights14/03/26 01:07 PM
17

How do you know these comments and likes are from men? Is it because you’re legally required to put use your real identity on social media? Did you check all these comments and profiles? Is it common for men to say “women in male dominated fields”?
/r/MensRights14/03/26 01:05 PM
1

I’m impartial to stats, but saying that homosexuality and heterosexuality is the same thing is your opinion, not a fact. Also your logic would indicate that women are the main problem in relationships, given lesbian domestic violence and divorce rates. Sorry if these stats make you uncomfortable, but it’s your own logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 01:04 PM
53

I disagree. These are real people (and many thousands of them) showing support for a woman literally murdering men. Real people out there that believe this is okay. If misogyny, or racism, or any other form of hate on social media is a problem, then so is misandry. Unless you think hate and discrimination on social media is acceptable and not an issue.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:43 AM
3

About 4 billion people (half the world’s population) live in countries like UK, Singapore, India etc where legally women cannot be charged with rape against men. Misandry is part of the law in many countries lol
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:39 AM
6

Just curious, any cases where the stepmom has to support the children financially after divorce? Or is this patriarchal“privilege” just for men?
/r/MensRights14/03/26 03:37 AM
1

Yeah, it sounds like you’re saying homosexuality is a problem for some reason with all the stats you’re showing, then trying to pass off people with different sexual orientation as the same group. To follow your logic, if gay males represent straight males, don’t lesbian females represent straight females too? We see how problematic females are in lesbians with the domestic violence and divorce rates then?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 03:36 AM
3

Legislation lowkey implying that women are special needs lmao
/r/MensRights11/03/26 10:41 AM
6

Another example of “equality”
/r/MensRights11/03/26 10:40 AM
1

Are gay males more sexually deviant then? Any statistics to back that up that is not anecdotal? Matter of fact, any statistics to back up anything you mentioned, other than the fact that you feel a whole group of people might be a certain way?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 11:51 AM
7

Gender equality index is basically women’s welfare index. Countries with male conscription, where the law states women cannot be charged with rape, where women earn more and have higher college admission rates than men all rank the highest on this index.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:48 PM
6

It’s either you treat both genders equally, or you don’t. And that comes with both sides of the coin. Don’t hit anyone for no reason, except self-defence etc. Doesn’t matter their gender or race.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 06:51 PM
9

this is crazy, is this indoctrination or what,
/r/MensRights22/02/26 09:46 AM
1

Such a mature, nuanced take?? Hats off to you mdm
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:15 AM
76

Pretty much news coverage for conscription in Ukraine. “Men are being forcibly dragged out of their homes and off the streets to be conscripted for war. Their poor mothers and wives!”
/r/MensRights24/01/26 07:06 AM
19

I agree, it shouldn’t be men vs women. And the gender wars are turning us against the real issues. But at the same time is annoying to pretend that women are not the more privileged gender in many areas in first world countries. In many third world countries, women are still very much an unprotected class, but it’s the other way around in first world countries. Did you know that about 50% of the world’s population live in countries where there are zero female rapists? This is because the laws in…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 07:08 PM
2

Like how many women who consider themselves feminists use feminism as an excuse for misandry?
/r/MensRights09/10/25 02:19 PM
8

More than half of the world’s population (~4 billion people) live in countries where there are zero female rapists, because these countries legally define rape as committed by a penis. This includes countries like the UK, China, India, Singapore etc.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/09/25 02:04 AM
26

Interesting how lesbians have the highest divorce rates by far, followed by heterosexual couples, and lowest are male gay couples. Who’s to blame in the majority of lesbian divorces?
/r/BlackPillScience30/07/25 04:41 PM
2

Its like me saying that a guys have access to gay causal sex so he’s lucky. Confused because are you saying sex for women is like having gay sex for straight men? Like women don’t want to have sex at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 04:33 PM
22

In countries like France paternity tests are actually illegal unless ordered by a court lol.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 04:30 PM
1

Confused what you’re replying to here, because you’ve replied to none of my points. Which one are you saying is invalid? My singular point is that in first-world countries, the majority of violent crime and murder are men. Which part of this do you disagree with, and why is quoting this statistic biased against women? Also, I think by modern society I mean first world countries, can refer to Google for definitions.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 04:29 PM
16

when does misogyny ever kill in modern society though? majority of victims of violent crime and murder are men. women are less likely to get murdered, and it’s at least partially because they get seen as “the weaker sex”. if everyone considered women fair game then their death rates would go up. not supporting misogyny, just that saying “misogyny kills” makes zero sense to me unless you’re in a third world Islamic country under Shariah law.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 09:12 AM
9

Still can’t fathom how some people can’t see that a sentence becomes discriminatory simply by replacing the social group. “I hate men.” - okay, justified “I hate women.” not okay, misogyny
/r/MensRights29/06/25 03:55 PM
2

Excellent piece - men and women both matter. That’s the issue with today’s society, we’re punishing today’s men for their ancestor’s actions.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 03:52 PM
4

Women having an advantage is considered the acceptable default, and anything short of a strong advantage for women is a disadvantage - sounds about right for today’s society.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/06/25 03:49 PM
4

Rape statistics are inherently skewed because about 4 billion people live in countries where there are zero female rapists. Legally, in countries like the UK, China, Singapore, India etc etc, the law defines rape as penetration with a penis, so legally there are zero women who have committed rape. It’s also quite true that men are inherently more physical. That’s why the majority of acts of physical heroism (saving people from disasters, accidents etc) are performed by men, but at the same time …
/r/MensRights29/06/25 03:46 PM
2

Also data shows that men spend far more hours per week at work on average, so that’s often left out as well. The total hours men spend on work and household chores combined exceed that of women on average by about 8 hours per week.
/r/MensRights28/06/25 02:21 AM
1

I’ve seen a lot of disgusting comments on 2XChromosomes and related subs, and those are far bigger subs with more hateful comments. They aren’t banned tho.
/r/MensRights27/06/25 07:35 AM
42

Just being in this subreddit is enough to get you auto-banned from many other subreddits, even ones that have nothing to do with gender. Just the way society is. I don’t have a real solution except to be there for each other, I guess.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:14 AM
5

Because they don’t want true equality, they just want to establish a matriarchal society.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:08 AM
10

Only men hold women accountable for their bad actions And even then it’s only a minority of men :’)
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:55 AM
17

And then they complain about fathers not being involved enough, lol.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 08:25 PM
9

And so many of them make men’s health month about women 🤷🏻‍♀️
/r/MensRights20/06/25 08:21 PM
11

LOL love this
/r/MensRights17/06/25 03:48 PM
2

I think the fact that about 4 billion people (half the world’s population) live in countries where legally, only men can be rapists. That means if a man forcibly has sex with a woman, it’s rape. If a woman forcibly has sex with a man, it’s a lesser crime with a lower minimum and maximum jail term, on top of the fact that women already receive lighter sentences. This includes countries like the UK, Singapore, China etc.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 02:22 AM
–

Sometimes I’m confused when people compare to past decades. When talking about women’s rights do you compare them to past decades and call it a day?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 11:08 PM
39

When you point this out on other subs feminists like to come and point out how women have it harder lol
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:45 PM
1

“I hang out with girls because it’s less drama.” As a guy with a healthy amount of female friends, that’s because they have way more drama LOL. And I love it, I’m a gossip girl. Anyways I don’t know what kind of social circles you’re running in but most people I know irl have a healthy amount of friends of either gender. I’ve known some of them since high school, we’re like siblings.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 02:36 PM
3

Your mom is not alone. A lot of women exhibit this ingroup bias towards other women. Research has shown that this in-group gender bias is far stronger in women compared to men.
/r/MensRights02/04/25 06:47 PM
5

In first world countries like Singapore and UK there are plenty of disparities for men. For example, in the UK, if a woman drugs a man and forcibly has sex with him, that is legally not rape. Rape in the UK (and China, India etc) is legally defined as something only a man can do. This applies about 4 billion citizens around the world, which is roughly half the population. In countries like Singapore (and South Korea, Taiwan etc), men have to go through mandatory military training for two years. …
/r/MensRights30/03/25 09:15 AM
3

In first world countries like Singapore and UK the law is very much not equal. For example, in the UK, if a woman drugs a man and forcibly has sex with him, that is legally not rape. Rape in the UK (and China, India etc) is legally defined as something only a man can do. This applies about 4 billion citizens around the world, which is roughly half the population. In countries like Singapore (and South Korea, Taiwan etc), men have to go through mandatory military training for two years. This mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:54 AM
10

In nature it’s actually males who have to date their natural predator. Many females from species such as the black widow spider eat their male counterparts after mating.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/25 08:47 AM
8

I would choose the bear over a woman. Bears have never raped or tortured men, and hundreds of thousands of men are killed by women every year. At most a bear kills one or two. Even if a bear kills me, at least it won’t tell people that I tried to assault her or whatever. Imagine getting murdered AND people thinking you deserve it. That’s even worse. Of course statistically not all women are like that, just like not all men are rapists. But just following the same logic these women are using.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 08:25 AM
1

Could you then explain why lesbian divorce rates are the highest, followed by heterosexual divorce rates (where women initiate most divorces), and then the lowest rates are among gay men? Perhaps marriage makes men the happiest not because women make better partners (statistically they make worse partners according to divorce rates among lesbians), but because men are just happier and more easily satisfied.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:22 AM
69

No, misandry and wokeness is still very much alive. Just because you see a few key figures against this doesn’t mean it doesn’t still exist at an institutional level. I mean, half the world’s population live in countries like UK, China etc without gender neutral rape laws. And even in first world countries like Singapore alimony is only for wives, or disabled husbands. Colleges and companies are still discriminating against men around the world. If it’s discrimination in the legal system, it’s n…
/r/MensRights29/03/25 08:18 AM
4

Yeah about 4 billion people live in countries like the UK, China, India, Singapore etc where the law defines rape as done by men only. So about half the world’s population basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 06:50 PM
9

It’s the same time frame for both men and women. Are you suggesting that women rape more outside the time frame or? Pretty hypocritical to make a post about disregarding statistics and then proceed to disregard statistics. Prime example of how a bias exists against men when it comes to study results
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 06:48 PM
189

It’s the same as anywhere else: research “favouring” females are readily accepted while research “favouring” males are treated very critically.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/25 06:44 PM
3

Honestly, this would be similar to a study asking men to “imagine a scenario where they might rape somebody”. Just like in these study where the women might imagine a scenario where they made a false accusation due to anger or revenge, maybe a gender swapped study might find men imagining a scenario where they raped due to anger or revenge. The two studies would have a similar limitation. How much do you think hypotheticals would translate to reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:56 PM
2

actual statistics and prevalence of SA perpetrated by men In the US, according to the CDC a similar amount of men are raped by women, as women are raped by men. Globally this number is far lower, both due to abuses in traditional patriarchal societies such as the Taliban, but more so due to the fact that there are zero documented rapes by women in many countries around the world. This is because about 4 billion people live in countries like the UK, China, Singapore, or India etc where legally wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:50 PM
13

Here you go. Though to be fair female serial killers are more rare then men, since women are physically weaker so it’s more difficult to commit mass murder, they have to get creative. Don’t let one of them get into power though. Female state leaders are far more likely to incite wars and other violence.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/03/25 06:56 PM
1

You mean charging a woman for the exact same crime as a man, with a minimum lower sentence is fair? They didn’t “create a separate law” by the way. It’s just lowered to the charge of sexual assault. Why not just charge all rapists with sexual assault then? I’m sure victims would love that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/25 05:09 PM
0

What’s the news here? Women can be misogynistic and men can be misandrist. I’ve had professors and bosses who are both women and misogynistic. They give better grades to guys and think men do better work. Does that make it okay? Should I not care about it because it’s literally these women’s fault that it’s happening? Not sure where you were going with this. The majority of people who judge women are other women, according to studies. That doesn’t make it okay. What’s the point of playing the bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/25 06:32 PM
18

“Not all men, but always a man.” Yeah. Always a man saving the day, fighting fires etc, risking their lives to protect women and children. Always a man getting falsely accused. Always a man getting scammed by paternal fraud. Two sides to every saying lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/25 07:41 PM
9

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 09:30 AM
7

Sounds like he accidentally slapped her a little too hard. Which is what she did to him first. Of course all the comments are destroying him for repeating what she did. Do they know how hard she hit him for him to react that way?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/25 07:57 PM
14

Because they don’t want to be accountable, nor make any real change, they just want to blame men (which is what lost them the vote in the first place). Interesting to note that they’re blaming men for voting Trump, when about half of male voters voted for Kamala, and about half of female voters voted for Trump.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/03/25 07:04 PM
30

One of my fiancée’s closest friends is 31 and single. She’s been on dates but never been in a relationship, and I don’t think she’s a questionable person at all. We all hang out quite a bit and she’s always been great.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 06:55 PM
1

I like how you repeatedly avoid the simple question of “who brought up feminism first? You or OP?”. I was just curious why you had to reply OP’s post by bringing up feminists, that’s all. You waste so many words just skirting around this topic. Someone’s afraid to admit their mistake.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 09:32 AM
1

I like how you stoop to insults when you can’t defend yourself logically. Who brought up feminists first? You or OP? What does this post have to do with feminism? Simple question that proves you’re just looking for excuses to ride on feminism. Healthy feminism and healthy MRAs are great, but not when they go into each other’s spaces and selfishly detrack issues. You’re making feminism look bad because that’s not what it’s supposed to be about, even though increasingly feminists are behaving like…
/r/MensRights05/03/25 10:22 PM
44

Legally in UK (and many other countries) only men can be charged with rape too :’)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/25 10:17 PM
47

Imagine back in the day if white people were exempt from prison because black people made up a majority of arrests. There’s reasons for that, institutional racism (bias against black people and boys in schools) as well as police bias (black people and men more likely to be arrested and charged). But we only acknowledge these factors for race, not gender ig.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 10:04 PM
9

You should care about bodily autonomy no matter the gender. Exactly. I was responding to your comment baselessly blaming your downvotes on religion. For all we know, the people who downvoted you were freethinkers. I’m also responding to the fact that neither OP nor the post blames feminism for this, but you felt the need to defend feminists for no reason. MRAs are against the mistreatment of women by the Taliban too. So should I go to a feminist forum talking about this issue, and start asking t…
/r/MensRights04/03/25 09:29 PM
3

In countries like Singapore with mandatory conscription that becomes a two-year gap :’)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/03/25 09:03 PM
21

Female genital mutilations are for religious reasons too. So why should I give a shit about those? Also, what does this have to do with feminism? It’s about men’s rights. I don’t look at women being treated horribly under the Taliban and go “whelp, that’s just religion, screw those virtue signalling feminists” do I?
/r/MensRights04/03/25 08:53 PM
1

You’ve seriously never seen a man defending a woman? Ever? That’s like saying I’ve never seen a woman outsmart a man or be a good leader. Statistically we can’t be sure of the exact numbers but saying you’ve never seen one anecdotally means you’re either lying or you live in an echo chamber. You can literally just google “man defends woman” and there will be pages upon pages of results.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 08:59 PM
3

The study clearly states that women self-reported apologising more often, not that they actually did. It’s like that study where Republicans self-reported being more courteous and polite than Democrats. Who knows if they actually are though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 03:43 PM
1

Best of luck m8
/r/MensRights10/02/25 04:00 PM
2

My guess is as good as yours. It’s like asking a feminist where would one find a femcel or radical? Hmm. Perhaps on 4chan? I honestly don’t have a good idea.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 03:56 PM
-2

Men’s rights and Incel culture are about as related as feminism and femcels/misandrists. That is to say, there are incels here, just like there are femcels and radical misandrists in AskFeminists. But that’s not what Men’s right or feminism is about.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 03:41 PM
10

In the UK, women can’t be rapists. Also true in Singapore, China, India, most of Middle East etc. About 4 billion people (half the world’s population) live in countries without gender neutral rape laws.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 10:08 PM
2

How about (Arab Law Quarterly)[https://brill.com/view/journals/alq/24/4/article-p417_4.xml]. It gives the same definition that rape only applies to men violating women. Also, your example is literally how a man is accused of sexual assault by a woman. You’re proving my point, genius.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 09:50 PM
12

What are you talking about, I’m literally citing the exact definition of rape in Islamic law. It explicitly states that only men can rape. I don’t agree with it, obviously. But it’s fact, you can’t say it’s not true just because you don’t like it lol.
/r/MensRights25/01/25 03:51 PM
92

Actually, rape in Islamic law is defined as “Forcible illegal sexual intercourse by a man with a woman who is not legally married to him, without her free will and consent.” Since rape can only be conducted by a man under Islamic law, women cannot be charged the rape. It’s the same for laws in countries like the UK, China, India etc. About 4 billion people in the world live in countries where only men can be charged with rape.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 08:05 PM
10

Making this meme as though JD Vance isn’t married to a racial minority and 50% of women didn’t vote for Trump themselves.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/01/25 02:02 PM
7

This is true. Research shows women are biased towards women, whereas men don’t demonstrate this in-group bias.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:57 PM
–

goes on to explain that Democratic men are more accepting of dynamics like polyamory which explains this difference Actually, the article does not say that polyamory explains this difference. To use the article’s words: “might be partly because, when it comes to attitudes about cheating, it’s actually Democrats who have become more accepting of extra-marital sex in recent years”. As in, it’s merely speculating that Democrats have more liberal attitudes towards both cheating and polyamory, which …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 03:22 AM
1

You’re giving a lot of anecdotal examples, so let’s move this discussion to statistics. Democratic men are more likely to have strayed than Republican men. Only 36% of liberal women say it is always wrong for a woman to have an affair, while 71% of conservative women believe it’s always wrong for a woman to have an extramarital affair. Interestingly, liberal women are also biased against men having affairs. Only a minority of them think it’s wrong for women to have an affair, but 57% think it’s …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 09:51 PM
1

To clarify, I also think both stay-at home spouses and working spouses spend time outside the home. I never said anything as extreme as how stay at home spouses don’t go out or interact with others, so not sure where you got that from. However, I think working spouses are more likely to spend more time outside the house than stay-at-home spouses. Do you disagree? Do you think stay-at-home spouses are likely to spend more time outside than working spouses? Also, my point was about forming close b…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 08:50 PM
–

Did a post on this. Simply not true. When men say they wouldn’t date a girl because of some reason they always get hated on or given reasons why they should look past it. Such as? Because I brought up paternity fraud with guys. Exactly. Guys actually have a legit risk of paternity fraud, yet it’s women who are always blaming men for their insecurities when paternity fraud is not possible for them. Why would you blame people because they picked one bad partner? You realize that happens all the ti…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 10:21 AM
–

Oh, there’s plenty of examples in this subreddit too. Can’t blame women for having preferences (height, looks, money), but blames men for having preferences (weight, looks, history). Can’t blame women when they ruin their relationship because they don’t trust their man for no reason. Similar to 2, but can’t be blamed when they choose a bad partner. Complaining about men complaining about Roe vs Wade being overturned. Like hello? Literally complaining about men trying to defend abortion rights fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 09:53 AM
34

I like how being too focused on supporting your family was literally the cause of the divorce. Like if you don’t want him to labour so much at his career, why did you take half of the fruits of his career??
/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:49 AM
–

Uh, saying that all men deserve to be locked up? Saying kill all men? Saying that men are the cause of all the problems in the world? So many examples out there. Just go to this sub called everydaymisadry and there’s tons of screenshots. So much proof as long as you’re not actively trying to deny it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 09:45 AM
1

Have you seen the posts on more popular subreddits which are misandrist? Am I to take it that all women are misandrists, or should I understand that the voices of loud angry people on the internet don’t represent the entire gender?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 10:57 PM
4

So blue pill logic is the opposite? If my partner likes something I did for my previous partner, I avoid doing it for them completely? That’s a stupid way to frame your opponent’s arguments. Red pillers aren’t arguing for you to do stuff for your partner that nobody enjoys, it’s about what you want from your partner. If nobody wants it you don’t have to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 04:02 PM
1

Also, 4 billion people live in countries such as China, the United Kingdom, Singapore, India etc etc where there are zero female rapists, since the law doesn’t define female rapists lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/25 07:18 AM
3

Literally no one is stopping men from organizing groups or solutions. Yeah, except you get banned from a ton of subreddits just for being in a Men’s Rights subreddit. Also there are so many feminist groups protesting basic things like gender neutral rape laws. What’s true is that there is literally nothing stopping women from doing anything nowadays. Literally illegal to discriminate. So I don’t know what they are complaining about lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/25 06:56 AM
4

My current partner hates spicy food, and I used to cook spicy food every day for my ex. Should I cook spicy food every day for my new partner? My current partner loves handmade gifts, and I used to make handmade gifts all the time for my ex. Should I make handmade gifts for my new partner? According to your dumb logic, should I cook spicy food for my partner every day even if she doesn’t want it? Or should she not care that I made handmade gifts for my ex, for not for her at all? The idea that i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/25 06:51 AM
26

I mean, is the patriarchy good or bad for men overall? If it’s good, why should men give it up? If it’s bad, then how is it a “patriarchy” if everyone is a victim? Sounds like the elites lording over us common folk rather than men lording over women.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:42 AM
11

Female sexual offenders are more common than you think Looking at data from the Center For Disease Control’s Survey, researchers found that in 2011 equal numbers of men and women reported being forced into non-consensual sex. Similarly, the 2010 survey showed comparable results estimating that nearly 4.5 million men in the US had, at some stage in their lives, been forced to penetrate another person – and that in 79.2 per cent of cases, the perpetrator forcing the sexual act was a woman. Most re…
/r/MensRights15/01/25 07:40 PM
1

If it’s purely a physical affair perhaps this is the case. But most affairs contain an emotional aspect as well. As in, for most affairs, the cheater doesn’t just download Tinder and finds a hookup for the night. It’s usually someone they develop a bond with over time. Far more common for this to occur in the workplace as a career woman, rather than as a stay at home wife meeting other mothers. Also, I think conservatives are supposedly less likely to keep close friendships of the opposite gende…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 06:22 PM
3

I don’t think the red pill is about obsessing over weight? That’s like saying the blue pill is about women getting to choose looks and money while bringing nothing to the table. Certainly there are extremes to both camps but characterizing the movement as a whole like that is kinda like using a straw man argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 08:24 PM
5

So basically everything is because of the patriarchy? Now I just replace the word patriarchy with the word misandry, what’s the difference? “Women used to be hired less in the workplace because of misandry, because society believe men should spend more time and work more.” Also, following the logic that all of men’s problems are caused by the patriarchy or misogyny, doesn’t that mean that men never actually had it better than women under a patriarchy?
/r/MensRights12/01/25 09:48 AM
7

Imagine being the level of feminist that says “let young black boys get SA’ed!”
/r/EverydayMisandry11/01/25 07:52 PM
26

Someone did, responses are mixed. Some see it as a sign of progress and many others obviously discredit the report, as expected.
/r/MensRights11/01/25 07:09 PM
–

I like this response. Truly as a dude sometimes you just gotta learn to shut your trap and listen :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 09:55 PM
–

Same, if I’m ranting about my shitty experiences with women or problems men face. Like both genders face their own problems, just be a listening ear to another human, you know? Too bad it almost never happens without someone getting defensive when it’s not about them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 09:53 PM
–

“It’s okay if I’m a misogynist, since I see misandry all the time!” Uh, no. Reducing either gender to a number is bad. If I see a woman doing it to men I don’t justify doing the same to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:14 PM
–

What is 13/52 and 42%?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:13 PM
–

I don’t get any of these references (except the last one) please explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:12 PM
1

Exactly. So are black men more dangerous than white men or…?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/25 05:08 PM
9

What about today? Why are there far more men carrying out acts of bravery? Is there some law holding women back from being brave?
/r/MensRights09/01/25 06:46 AM
1

My mention of the Dawoodi Bohra was because of the well reported prosecuted cases in the West Right, so their practices are prosecuted…? For every 6-7 boys.. there is 1 girl So you’re saying even your example affects 6-7 more boys than girls? I was referring to circumcision on minors around the world btw, compared to labiaplasty on minors. It is on that scale, thousands of girls compared to tens of millions of boys. For every affected girl, thousands of boys are affected. I guess we’re on the sa…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 06:42 AM
3

I see women being wary of men if they don’t know them. To use your own words, is there anything wrong with someone being wary of queer people if they don’t know them? Is there something wrong with being wary of black people if you don’t know them? I would ENCOURAGE people to treat queer people the same as straight people. I would encourage people to treat women the same way they treat men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 11:31 PM
1

hundreds of labiaplasties carried out in the UK every year on post puberty girls, frowned upon? Actually, it is frowned upon because doctors recommend against labiaplasty for girls under 18. This is not case for the tens of thousands of circumcisions performed on boys in the UK each year, however. Thank you for proving my point about religion, in that only minor/niche religions require genital mutilation for girls. I’m talking about Jewish and Muslim practice of circumcision for young boys, whic…
/r/MensRights08/01/25 11:27 PM
2

I’m confused because are you saying that forcing post puberty labiaplasty and genital piercings on young girls is not frowned upon in Western society? I don’t know any religion that requires labiaplasty or vaginal piercings in Western society, could you cite one?
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:28 PM
55

I like how they aborted the study when they discovered the bias against men, instead of publishing their findings. Trying to cover up any evidence that goes against the narrative.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:49 AM
4

Changing the legal definition of rape to include men as victims, instead of just women. That’s not true at all, plenty of mainstream feminists groups opposed this and still do. More than 4 billion people around the world still live in countries such as China, UK, and India where women cannot be charged with rape. Government-endorsed feminist groups in these countries sign petitions against gender-neutral rape laws all the time. I think feminism does have its place as men and women both face issu…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 07:47 AM
3

To put it in simple terms, it’s not objectification when you depict men in a sexual way (Magic Mike etc), but it is objectification when you depict women in a sexual way.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 07:05 PM
2

Also because the actual crime is usually committed by men, but women are often accomplices. How many men have been charged with murder, but their female accomplices been charged with being an accessory to murder (a non violent crime?)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 07:02 PM
13

And yet some feminists cite that female genitalia mutilation is a far more pressing issue than male genitalia mutilation. The former is heavily frowned upon by society and occurs in remote tribal areas, the latter is performed on millions of boys around the world every year and socially acceptable.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:57 PM
11

This is exactly it. Plus the way academia often works is that you are looking for evidence of your hypothesis that you already have before you even begin your research. Much of academia is funded by the ideology that men are bad or women are treated unfairly, so if you start with that hypothesis it’s easy to find data to justify some aspect of that.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:53 PM
1

Do you believe mental health is part of healthcare? If so, asking that question is like asking what’s unique about women’s healthcare? Why do they need to be healthy that’s different from what men need? Both genders are biologically different, so they will need have different needs when it comes to healthcare, including mental health. And that’s before factoring in societal and cultural pressures that shape mental health differently for each gender. One example is PTSD, which affects far more me…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 01:51 PM
13

I like how even this article frames young men as the problem, when their owns survey shows that an increasing number of both men and women as unsatisfied.
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:38 PM
6

Apologies for the confusion. You said comparing men and black people as social groups being over-represented in a statistic is very different, but I beg to differ. I think they’re very similar because both are just different social groups that show up more in a statistic because of certain external factors. If you do agree with that then we are indeed on the same page. And I agree with your point that there needs to be more study into said factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:35 PM
1

No one is required to offer everyone the same access to their body, nor are they required to tolerate unwanted attention. I agree completely. I don’t see OP disagreeing with you here. You’re using words OP didn’t use. To be clear, let me use OP’s words here. Do you think a woman so much as talking to, looking at, or touching a man the wrong way is a violation of their sacred chastity?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:30 PM
10

It’s funny you understand that there are external factors affecting why a social group can be over-represented in a statistic. I’m not sure why you think the two statistics are so different. Of course the exact factors are different between black people and men. But is it that you think societal and cultural factors don’t affect men the same way they affect black people? There are lots of reasons why men are over represented in violent crime. Because of societal expectations. This is especially …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:25 PM
1

That’s your assumption. He just said touching them the wrong way, or looking at/talking to someone the wrong way. It could imply molestation, or it could just literally mean touching someone the wrong way. I don’t get the sense that OP is trying to say molesting someone is okay here. In any case, sometimes women put their hands on my arm when they laugh and I don’t consider that sexual harassment. Should I be?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:15 PM
1

I think you’re actually exemplifying OP’s point here. OP: Some of these same women will act like a man so much as talking to, looking at or touching them in the wrong way is a violation. You: So you’re saying unwanted sexual attention is okay??? Why do you think talking or looking at someone falls under unwanted sexual attention? If a woman bumps into my elbow, is she sexually harassing me?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:02 PM
8

We have to be openly honest about the offenders of violent crime as well. It’s also true that more than 60% of violent crimes are committed by black people, even though they make up a minority of the population. Also, lots of women do not get charged with murder, but conspiracy to commit murder. That doesn’t count as a violent crime statistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:52 PM
6

Same energy as saying “most female claims of misogyny are not misogyny. My wife and I split the bills equally and I get told by women that I’m a misogynist for making her pay her share.” Um, no. Misandry is like when 4 billion people live in countries where only men can legally commit rape, and women cannot. This includes countries like UK, China etc. Misandry is also when men receive heavier sentences for the same crimes, or when teachers are biased against male students when it comes to gradin…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:18 PM
2

Interesting. This would also make rape laws gender neutral for about 4 billion people worldwide, including countries like UK, China and Singapore where women cannot legally commit rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 06:15 PM
3

Replace sex by race and suddenly it’s not socially acceptable anymore lol.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 06:03 PM
2

Actually, a much higher proportion of violent crime victims are male… So in theory, men should be more afraid to go out than women. It’s just that men are unlikely to be overly paranoid and can recognise that violent crime still occurs at a relatively low rate in most first world countries.
/r/MensRights01/01/25 06:03 PM
1

What was the manifesto? I see mentions of it in articles but none of them talked about it actual content.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 08:17 AM
1

Probably because you’re supposed to be honest with your lawyer, and that honesty is protected by client-attorney privilege. It’s incredibly stupid to lie to your own lawyer.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:29 AM
8

Okay, you’re not understanding the studies correctly either. 2.1% to 10.9% is the number of PROVEN false accusations. It’s not that the remaining 90-98% of accusations are proven guilty. Otherwise almost every single accusation would result in a conviction. Only 15-25% of accusations are PROVEN true. The vast majority of accusations are simply deemed unsubstantiated and dropped. It’s not easy to prove an accusation true or false. Simply giving inconsistent testimony doesn’t make an accusation fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 03:27 AM
-1

I’m just agreeing with you though. Women don’t need help from men or their protection. Just like how millions of little boys and girls don’t need protection from their abusive moms. Anyway weed is illegal in my country. Just like rape is, except only for men. Same for UK, China, India, Singapore etc. About 4 billion people in the world live in countries with 0 female rapists since the law magically makes all female rapists disappear there.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 09:15 PM
4

This is a penalty on people who earn less, not women. Unless the author is suggesting married women should earn less than men?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 09:05 PM
0

Thanks for agreeing with me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 08:53 PM
-5

Right? Firefighters are just posers like fires aren’t even real or common enough for them to do real work. Women are immune to fire or natural disasters anyway, that’s why I always ignore ads asking me to donate to women and children who are victims of natural disasters. They don’t need no men protecting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 04:42 PM
2

You literally said men just seem to shit on each other nonstop. It’s just like how women’s problems are caused by women. We’re on the same page here? Women need to do better if they want to feel better, same for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/24 01:21 AM
1

Because there is a bias in marking in favour of girls. Study 1 Study 2 Study 3
/r/MensRights12/12/24 11:32 PM
3

This is like blaming misogyny on women. If only women would stop hating women, misogyny wouldn’t exist! Sure, women can be misogynistic. And yeah, some men make videos hating on other men. But the majority of misandry and “men suck as a group” content are made by women. It’s also obvious who women are biased towards other women’s behaviour. It doesn’t just have to be in real life, online spaces and comments exist for everyone to see. Research shows women have a stronger ingroup bias compared to …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 11:19 PM
–

Don’t listen to this idiot. It’s not even a men vs women thing, idk why people are making the election about that. About of men voted for Kamala, and half of women voted for Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:54 PM
–

Exactly. It was a win in the bag. All Kamala’s party had to do was reach out and take it, instead of pushing away their supporters. They literally lost this election for no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:51 PM
–

You are upset about Elon owning Twitter, but it’s okay for Kamala to be backed by Google? A search engine that literally had a “glitch” on election day and only showed polling stations for democrats?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:50 PM
2

True, but also because research shows that women have a stronger ingroup bias that men don’t.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 08:43 PM
1

True, but there are many more male feminists than women who participate in men’s rights. Just look at the number of men on feminist subreddits, and the number of women here.
/r/MensRights04/12/24 10:40 AM
5

This one is so important. It’s countries like China, UK, Singapore, India etc and many more. More than 4 billion people (half the world’s population) live in countries where the law stipulates that only men can be charged with rape.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:27 AM
4

Well, those guys suck then. And I think he meant more along the lines of saying “black people suck”. That’s the same as saying “women suck” or “men suck”.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:25 AM
3

Agree 100%
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 12:43 AM
2

I have NEVER heard or seen a woman dismissing sexual abuse against male minors. Did you even read the post before commenting? The post is literally about the porn star glorifying her own practice of sexual abuse. And she’s not the only one, other celebrities like Cardi B, Riley Reid etc do the same and laugh about it. And in any case, what do other men have to do with the victims in any case? Do women deserve to get sexually abused because some other women objectify themselves? Do men deserve to…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:09 PM
-1

I don’t think only incels have these conservative views. It’s like how all femcels are feminists, but not all feminists are femcels?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/24 09:00 PM
7

I like how they want to ensure women’s “equal rights” to education by only allowing women to attend university. Really representative of what these feminists think equality means.
/r/MensRights01/12/24 08:44 PM
1

Do you have a source for this? Would really like to note one down.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 08:15 PM
35

Also non gender neutral rape laws. Between the UK, China, India, Singapore and the dozens of other countries, more than half the worlds population (4 billion) people live in countries where only men can be charged for rape, as a rapist needs to have a penis.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 08:08 PM
3

men tend to apply to more positions they are less qualified for while women don’t for those reach positions. Not true. “Contrary to prevailing assumptions, men and women faculty members from all four fields preferred female applicants 2:1 over identically qualified males with matching lifestyles (single, married, divorced), with the exception of male economists, who showed no gender preference.” Studies show a hiring bias for women over equally qualified men, not less qualified men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 08:02 PM
6

Is that the same reason black people are disproportionately killed by police? Stop blaming the victims.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 10:33 AM
9

In most western countries studies show that teachers are biased and give better grades to girls, and women are more likely to be hired based on gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:30 AM
6

When was the last time you were drafted for war? The point is it will never happen to you. Which western countries forces you to have your rapists baby? Because I can point of plenty of western countries that still have the draft, and non gender-neutral rape laws.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:29 AM
2

Are you saying women in the Middle East have their governments and corporations constantly pandering to them or giving them special treatment? Do they have quotas just for women, and are women more likely to attend college or get hired in these countries? I don’t think the Taliban is pandering to women at all, these women are actually oppressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:21 AM
3

I mean if you read his post, he did say very few men for advocate for this. His title is just a generalisation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 10:18 AM
8

There hasn’t been a female incel killer with a manifesto. Yes there is. SCUM Manifesto is written by Valerie Jean Solanas, who tried to kill Andy Warhol. Hateful/violent men and women both exist. Not hard to google before giving an unsubstantiated blanket statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/24 11:05 PM
4

Half the voters for him were women (43%), more than half of white women voted for him lol. Meanwhile half of men (42%) voted for Kamala. So it’s really their own problem.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 04:57 AM
3

what kind of handwriting is that??
/r/MensRights14/11/24 03:29 PM
1

I like how you accuse me of skirting questions when you skirted mine first. I asked if you agree with the statement “Hate on women is justified” and you didn’t answer. Unless your answer is that hate on women may be justified, depending on what “hate” means? Also, your questions make no sense. Why are you asking me about the thought process behind these statements, when I did not make them in the first place? You asked me what kind of negative statements I saw on the 4B, and I’m just repeating t…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:52 PM
1

The word hate is used very loosely in your phrase. Sure. Do you agree with the statement “Hate on women is justified”? If no, then you shouldn’t say the same thing about men. If yes, then that’s misogynistic. Saying the same thing about men would be misandrist. That’s all. And what is so many women? Excellent question, because this is what women are saying in those subreddits. Please raise this question with them and not me. Also, if you think refusing to greet or acknowledge women is fine, then…
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:32 PM
9

Hate on women is justified. I will no longer greet women. I will no longer acknowledge any women. It’s so many women that it might as well be all women. If you think all of these are not misogynistic, then okay. Otherwise, these are all being said about men on the main 4B subreddit as comments and main posts, and they are getting thousands of upvotes. You can just go in that subreddit and search for the keyword “man”. I can’t link another Reddit sub here.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 02:05 AM
8

And if men don’t use women, how would women going celibate hurt men to begin with? And if women don’t use men, how would men going celibate hurt women to begin with? Like you said, it’s not women choosing to be celibate that people are having an issue with. It’s the rhetoric that’s being spewed in the 4B subreddits about men.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:52 AM
2

I mean, 4B is misandrist as much as MGTOW is misogynistic? (Perhaps 4B is more discriminatory, since MGTOW is not about punishing women, but 4B is supposedly about punishing men which is what they’re getting ridiculed for. Like good riddance?)
/r/MensRights10/11/24 01:48 AM
8

Lmao I like how they’re blaming men when 43% of men voted for Kamala, and 42% of women voted for Trump.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/24 03:27 PM
142

I like how these radical feminists want 4B but think MGTOW is misogynistic lmao
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:19 PM
6

By their own logic misogyny will be totally okay again for the next generation lol
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 01:03 AM
10

A lot of these feminists don’t even hide the fact lol. They say it’s okay to be sexist to men because they were oppressed in the last century.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 12:54 AM
15

Dude, you get banned from some mainstream subreddits like ThatsInteresting just for being on the Men’s Rights subreddit. Meanwhile TwoXChromosomes and 4B movement subreddits are completely fine lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/11/24 12:44 AM
1

Sure, Trump lies a lot. So other politicians don’t lie? Come tell me I’m wrong when he implements a nation-wide abortion ban, as Kamala repeatedly claims he will do. Otherwise, live with the fact that I’m right.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 12:06 AM
12

Sure. Freezing sperm costs about $500 per collection. IVF treatments cost about $15000 to $20000 per cycles. For couples under 40, roughly 60% have a successful IVF after 6 cycles. That’s $100000 to $150000 per couple lol. Multiply that by the nation and we get a bill of quite a few trillion, if she wants to foot the bill for that, sure.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 09:49 PM
85

These people are also idiots who don’t know how to look up anything. It’s not men’s fault that Trump won. 42% of men voted for Kamala and 43% of women voted for Trump. Also, Trump said he would veto an abortion ban. So most of the states where abortion is already legal, either candidate makes zero difference since both would veto a ban lol.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 09:38 PM
0

Andrew Tate got a lot of pushback though. The celebrities telling Margot Robbie to abort her baby boy and try again don’t seem to be getting pushback so
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:29 PM
9

Look at the comments about Margot Robbie’s baby boy telling her to abort and try again. That’s casual misandry. No way you can flip the genders on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:28 PM
–

Obama literally said “Women, yall are better than us men.” and “the men of this country suck.” when endorsing Kamala. And Kamala herself said “if you don’t vote for me you’re just a misogynist”. Also, the much bigger issue is that a lot of radical feminists and misandrists are on the Democratic side. They are vocal about both politics and misandry, which makes people associate the Democrats with misandry and hurts the campaign.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 09:13 PM
–

But also to be fair Trump won both the popular vote and the electron vote this time. So he did win over a bigger portion of the population (about 5 million).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:30 PM
0

Fair to have your own views. But honestly I’m doubting how much of the patriarchy still exists or if it even exists at all in this day and age (I’m only referring to first world countries). In modern society, studies show that women are more likely to be hired based on gender, and that boys are discriminated against in school. Meanwhile, there’s still no gender neutral rape laws, men are still conscripted for mandatory military service in first world countries like Korea and Singapore.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:41 PM
1

It’s contradictory because is the patriarchy overall beneficial for men, or is it overall harmful for men? It can’t be both. Of course, it’s not contradictory if you mean the patriarchy sometimes helps men and sometimes hurts other men. In that case the patriarchy also sometimes helps women, and sometimes hurts other women.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 04:58 PM
17

This is funny because actually 45% of women voted for Trump lol. And 53% (more than half) of white women voted for Trump.. Meanwhile 42% of men voted for Kamala. So it’s pretty evenly split. But these idiots can’t even do a quick Google search before tearing their hair out and blaming men.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/11/24 04:54 PM
1

Fair, all politicians lie. That’s an argument you can make for either side’s proposed policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 04:47 PM
2

Consequences like what? Fine? Jail?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 04:43 PM
-1

I think an easier way to help men understand the bear analogy is to ask them: “Bear or woman?” Hundreds of thousands more men are killed by women than bears each year. Millions of men get sexually abused/assaulted by women, a bear would never do that. Plus, it ends at death with the bear. Many women convicted of murder often defame their victims by falsely claiming self-defense. It’s a common legal defense strategy. So not only might you get assaulted or killed, but people might think the worst …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:37 AM
5

What rights? Trump said he would veto a national abortion ban if it came across his desk.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:33 AM
18

What rights? Trump literally said he would veto an abortion ban if it came across this desk. He just believes in state level law, instead of federal law. He also said that even in state level bans, the ban needs to be 1. Definitely longer than six weeks (meaning abortion should be legal for babies not just up to six weeks) 2. Not applicable for rape, incest or when it threatens the life of the mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:30 AM
31

If it’s not women’s job to look out for men’s interests, why is it men’s job to look out for women’s interests? I think men and women both face different issues, and we should all support each other’s issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:25 AM
–

Stop making this a men vs women thing. Exit polls show close to 50% of men voted for Trump, close to 50% voted for Kamala. It also shows nearly 50% of women voted for Trump. In fact, Trump won 53% of white women voters, while Kamala only won 45% of white women. It’s not a blame game, but you can blame white women if you want lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:23 AM
1

At least Trump changed Title IX to give accused men due process. Biden and Kamala changed that back so the moment an accusation is made you’re suspended and your career is effectively over.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 09:14 PM
56

I like how they keep saying data shows more men do something without providing a single source. What data? I can do the same. Data shows women are far more likely to be biased towards women etc.
/r/MensRights01/11/24 06:45 PM
0

Actually men are the ones insisting… No, your original point was that women who like jerks & criminals don’t exist, but it was only men who said such things. I’m just pointing out some women do. None of my comments remotely suggests all women are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 10:39 PM
0

Exactly! And either way these crazy men and women don’t represent the whole gender. (Exactly why I added not all women to clarify)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 08:46 PM
2

Exactly! And these crazies don’t make up the entire gender either way.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 08:45 PM
1

Not all men but always a man doing the brave and heroic. Saving children from fires, defending the country, keeping us safe etc.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 01:19 PM
0

If you don’t rape and don’t know any rapists, does rape not exist? Anyways it’s in the news. These women (read: not all women) are crazy
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 12:56 PM
3

The women writing letters to Wade Wilson beg to differ. There are actual women who are crazy like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 08:15 PM
0

Exactly. If you’re not doing anything slutty/being a gold digger/being a manipulative liar, who cares if some terminally online person thinks you’re one of those things?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 08:14 PM
0

No, you don’t have to be rawdoggjng people like an absolute maniac to get paternity tests. Must the driver be driving like an absolute maniac for you to wear a seatbelt? Should a woman or man have their own independent finances, or should they trust all their finances to their partner? Should someone only have their own bank account if they have a lot of money, just like if someone should only get a paternity or STD test if they have a lot of sex? Fyi, getting a STD test is just good sense regar…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 08:12 PM
2

Can’t disagree with this lol. But I think you want to reduce them to zero, not equalise lol since both men and women do these things and it’s not zero.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 01:59 AM
0

9 out of every 10 prisoners are boys Yes, and 17,000 out of the 24,000 prisoners are black or hispanic. They make up minority in society, yet the majority in prison. What’s your point? That certain demographics are more likely to be incarcerated? not a single abuse of a girl that did not involve a women staff member I like how you’re so triggered your use of the language is breaking down. Your double negative means that ALL abuses of girls involved a female staff member. Read it again. Not true …
/r/MensRights28/10/24 07:03 AM
-1

I was talking about the trades where women make up 3% of the workforce. Women make up like 3% of trades. Do you think these two sentences written by you have the same meaning? I honestly can’t tell if your English isn’t great, or you’re just back -tracking and trying to say that women make up 3% of only a few specific trades, not trades in general. If it’s the former, you’re forgiven and let’s move past this misunderstanding. Otherwise, I was replying to the literal meaning of your words. I thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:23 PM
0

Why do you need to equalise sexual assaults? Do we also need to equalise the number of babies killed by men, because most infanticides are committed by women? Or do we need to equalise the sexual victimisation of adjudicated youth, since 95% of these are committed by female staff, even though female staff make up less than half the staff members?. There are some things we should equalise though. Like the hiring discrimination against men.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:16 PM
-1

I don’t think I misinterpreted your words. You used an anecdotal example from 70 years ago and this study was done in recent years. You also questioned women in the labor force, so I cited a study for that. How can feminists like you expect us to take them seriously when they refuse to have an open mind themselves? This is why there’s a bias against men’s issues. I have provided solid data of discrimination against men, in both education and hiring. So have other commenters. Yet you refused to a…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 09:01 PM
0

Are you saying that this study, accepted by Taylor & Francis, one of the biggest academic publishers and which publishes plenty of feminist studies, is invalidated by your anecdotal experience? Globally this trend is also true. Both in the UK and US. There is no way women only make up 3% of the labour force lol. That would mean that out of every 10 women you know, less than 1 has a job. Fyi, men are biased against in hiring, not women. Multi-national studies have found no sign of discrimination …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:53 PM
0

You didn’t even link the same report as OP. lol, I was talking about the source you linked. My link is the source your article is based on. You didn’t even open the page? Again using your data, 100% of staff abuse of girls involved male staff. 98% of staff abuse of boys involved female staff. Here’s what the report actually provides (table 11). “Of the adjudicated youths: 1.7% were male youth reporting male staff 92% were male youth reporting female staff 2.5% were male youth reporting both male…
/r/MensRights27/10/24 08:43 PM
1

Being in the MensRights subreddits automatically gets you banned from most subreddits. Even those that have nothing to do with gender issues, such as the ThatsInteresting subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 08:25 PM
5

Society needs equality between the sexes. Same goes for people who hate men’s rights movements. Do you want men to be unequal to women? Subservient?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 01:43 PM
9

How are women being lifted at the expense of men? Studies show that girls are graded more favourably than boys now. As a result, more girls are going to college than boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/24 01:42 PM
1

Since OP didn’t mention it these are children in prisons for children, 95% of them are male. You’re reading the study incorrectly. The study states that 10.8% of male youth and 4.7% of female youth reported sexual activity with the staff.. Of this group, 95% reported that the perpetrators were female staff. The study also sampled a similar number of male and female youth. So for both male and female youth, majority of the perpetrators were female staff.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 12:30 PM
2

It’s true that there are more accidents involving male drivers than female drivers. Did you know that there are far more infanticides committed by women, especially for babies less than a month old? Are women just far more likely to be baby killers? Or is it that women are more likely to spend time with babies and also face post-partum depression? There are far more male drivers than female drivers. So it makes sense that there are more accidents involving male drivers.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 05:28 PM
3

Just like how only women say things like “She’s such a slut etc.” Man don’t even use the word “slut” lol. It’s girl vocabulary.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/24 05:20 PM
1

Thank you! It’s nice when men and women show support and empathy for each other’s difficulties.
/r/MensRights24/10/24 04:40 PM
1

Women judge weight, being a single parent, and tattoos too lol. So actually both judge that. Most of my church friends would judge (n-#) too, I’m assuming that’s body count based on the link?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 04:06 PM
3

Lmao if someone told me all that, I’d be like “Well if you’re ready to settle now, why not go back to him?”
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/24 07:17 AM
1

I don’t think Janet Yellen’s opinion is an objective fact on whether something is good or bad. Here’s a Business Insider article from 2023:“Janet Yellen made the worst mistake in Treasury history when she failed to lock in cheap debt, elite investor Stanley Druckenmiller says” Here’s a 2022 article from CNN: “Treasury secretary concedes she was wrong on 'path that inflation would take'”. Interestingly, she was originally trying to downplay the tremendous inflation during the Biden administration…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 07:55 PM
2

I mean, Trump isn’t the only person to ever use or propose tariffs. He didn’t invent this policy. Sometimes countries use tariffs to protect domestic industries/jobs. But yeah, I agree. I think in this case, imposing the proposed tariffs would hurt consumers more than it would protect jobs. But we could be wrong though. It’s hard to predict exactly with economic policies.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 12:40 PM
1

Maybe we’re from different countries but I’ve only ever heard women use the word “slut” lol. Like “Omg she’s such a slut!” It’s not a word in a guy’s vocabulary imo.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 10:32 AM
1

I think you vastly underestimate the power of media. As evident that you think Trump is all bad, and Kamala is all good. That’s a pretty childish/black and white way of looking at the world. FYI, I also think Kamala is a better candidate. But I don’t think she’s complete good, and I don’t think Trump is complete shit. Do you think his relationship with North Korea and Putin was a bad move? Do you think relations with Russia and North Korea improved after Trump? Or did they go straight down the d…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:24 AM
1

I think it’s quite childish to say all his policies are shit, and all of Kamala’s policies are great. Kamala is more pro-Israel than Trump, and has promised to continue sending military aid to Israel. That’s because her top sponsors (Google and Amazon) have a 1.2 billion dollar deal with Israel. Trump has proposed reducing taxes for tips, a policy which Kamala copied a month later. Do you think that’s a shit policy too? No doubt both politicians have shit and good policies. But it’s not black an…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 10:12 AM
1

Who are these women who are feminists who want princess treatment? There are literally users here with the flair “feminist entitled to your wallet” lol. It’s like asking who are these men who are red-pillers? Like, check the flair?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 08:32 PM
2

You don’t like Trump because Kamala’s top campaign sponsors are companies like Alphabet Inc (Google), Meta, Apple, Microsoft etc. These are tech companies which control a large amount of the flow of information. Of course both candidates have good and bad policies, perhaps one more than the other. But it’s childish to think that one candidate is 100% good and the other is 100% bad. Yet that’s what it looks like when you Google each candidate or ask ChatGPT (Microsoft has a controlling stake in O…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 08:16 PM
5

Not all men but always a man being brave, saving your life at the risk of his, pulling you from a fire or a trapped car etc.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 01:04 PM
14

It’s not just a semantic argument. Causing sexual activity without consent doesn’t carry the same maximum punishment as rape. It’s like stabbing someone to death with a knife and getting charged with assault instead of homicide.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/24 05:22 AM
17

I mean if the law is the moral standard then slavery was morally ok at one point, and what the Taliban is doing to women is perfectly alright under their law.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/10/24 05:20 AM
2

But the sociological survey linked about you shows that only 6% of the BTS fanbase are women above 30. And they are one of the groups that actually have an older fanbase. New kpop groups cater to younger audiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/24 05:19 AM
0

Let me put it in simpler terms so you can understand. “People prefer having this group do a profession, and are willing to pay them a lot of money for it”. Is that an advantage or not? Or are you not capable of answering this with yes or no? And what kind of stupid analogy is that about not wanting to sell a house? Are you saying that all porn and onlyfans creators hate their jobs and don’t want to do it? You are simply looking down on people in the sex industry and think they are inferior to ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 02:19 PM
-5

The advantage is that people want (insert group) to be (insert profession) and are willing to spend money on it. Let me put it this way. Is it an advantage that people want men to be astronauts and are willing to spend money on it? Is it an advantage that people want women to be hookers and are willing to spend money on it? Exact same sentences. Is 1 an advantage? That means 2 is an advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 11:55 PM
10

Whenever I see a video of a father doing these things on the internet, the comments have never been like “Omg what an amazing dad because he plays with his kid!” It’s always been “As he should” or “Why am I watching a video of him doing the bare minimum” or “Why is he even getting recognition for doing basic shit” Please show me an example of a dad tossing a ball in the yard and getting the comment “HERO! Father of the year!” ??
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 07:22 AM
0

Yes, if you get paid more than your peers due to your ability, it is an advantage. Was that a question? Also, it’s not that women “are better” at sex work. They just get paid more due to higher demand, and sex work can pay well, that’s all.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/24 07:18 AM
4

Exactly this. 2-5% are proven false, as in the accuser gets caught making a false accusation and gets charged with making a false report. Fyi, this means hard evidence like a confession or video evidence. Simply giving inconsistent testimony as an accuser doesn’t meet the bar for a false accusation, this usually means the case just gets dropped (and thus not counted among the false cases).
/r/MensRights17/10/24 07:13 AM
9

What controversy with Obama? Missed that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/24 07:07 PM
2

This is such a vague hypothetical. It depends on the circumstances? If my daughter accused some celebrity she’s never met before of SAing her, then probably not. Otherwise yes. I’ll believe her and give her all the support she needs, including paying for counselling etc. I don’t need to pay for legal services, if she wants to pursue legal action then SA is a criminal offence and the state will prosecute if there is sufficient evidence. I literally cannot pay the prosecutor because that is corrup…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 03:33 AM
0

What kind of men are you talking to? Because I’ve met plenty of women in real life and online who think that women are naturally liars and men don’t deserve the truth, so they should lie and manipulate. But I’m sure not all women are like that. Not all women are selfish and manipulative, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 06:15 PM
1

It means exactly what it means? If you arrange all women and men in terms of bravery, the bravest women would be much braver than the average man or woman? I’m saying that genetically men are usually physically tougher than women, and there is more societal pressure on men to be brave, so we see more men doing physically brave things? Nothing about that suggests women have to cough up confidence but men don’t. Again, both genders can be equally brave, as I stated. I was making a comment on physi…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:12 PM
1

Here is a study that shows higher grades given to girls, and suggests this is a systematic bias.. There are plenty more. Easy to find on Google scholar. Also studies in Australia, Sweden and other countries showing a resume is more likely to be hired/given an interview when the same resume identifies as a woman rather than a man. Not sure why you are so worked up. I said discrimination against women was stronger back in the day. I’m not disagreeing with you that it still exists. What I’m saying …
/r/MensRights13/10/24 06:07 PM
2

Exactly. Plenty of women get charged for being an accessory to murder, but not murder itself
/r/MensRights13/10/24 05:58 PM
1

That’s also true. I’m just pointing out that saying only 2-10% of accusations are false is misleading. It’s as misleading as saying only 15-25% of accusations are true. No, 2-10% get proven false, and 15-25% get proven true. The rest are unsubstantiated, so we simply don’t know the real rate. We also don’t know the real rate of unreported cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/24 05:57 PM
3

Yes. Men’s rights affect women too, and vice versa. In my country only women get alimony, husbands legally cannot get alimony unless they are crippled. In this case, men risk more by staying home, so there’s more pressure on women to give up their careers in favour of their husbands. —————— Yes, to a degree. I agree with some points of feminism, and not with others. As I’m sure a feminist will agree with some views here, and not others. As an example I don’t believe in radical feminism. ————- No…
/r/MensRights13/10/24 05:54 PM
22

Love your structured and well-researched content! Just want to add that countries like United Kingdom and Singapore also have gendered rape laws, such that women cannot be charged with rape.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 06:41 PM
10

You’re right. Research actually supports the fact that women have a stronger ingroup bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 02:36 PM
10

Exactly this. If only 2-10% are false, the rest must be true right? So 90-98% of all accused are convicted? No, 2-10% are proven false, meaning with a confession from the accuser or video evidence. In such cases the accuser can be charged with making a false report. The majority are unsubstantiated (meaning lack of evidence, or accuser giving unreliable/changing testimony etc). Only 15-25% of accusations are actually proven true (I.e land a conviction).
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:33 AM
10

I think Depp was a shitty partner, but that doesn’t warrant being beaten, having part of your finger cut off, having shit in your bed and then having it turned around on you that you are the physical abuser.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:29 AM
7

Still a lot of people defending Heard and claiming she’s innocent though.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:29 AM
9

Feminists and women in general use social media more than men though. Probably because women have more of a self-defense mechanism where they’ll call out posts attacking them, like red pillers. But men have more of a protective mechanism where they’ll defend other group being attacked as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:28 AM
19

It’s because there are “feminists” like this, and they are often the loudest. It’s a flip side of the coin with Andrew Tate, who had extreme views. Most people who believe in men’s rights don’t resonate even remotely with what he’s saying. The issue with these radical feminists is that they don’t face as much opposition as Andrew Tate. Go to any social media platform and you can find many posts with hundreds of thousands of likes on it, with no one calling them out. I’m sure most women don’t agr…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:25 AM
2

I think it’s not healthy for them to think all women are lying, manipulative and heartless just because their family members are like that. But if you think all women are like that, go ahead?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:16 AM
3

They are, except one ideology is being turned into real policy.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 02:37 PM
5

And I wouldn’t tell you to trust stranger men. But imo it’s not healthy to view all women a certain way. Even if most of the women in your life are like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:33 PM
0

Hmm. So if you bring up taking a paternity test before having a child, that’s okay right? It’s not like you’re accusing them of cheating in the past, since the child is not conceived yet. But it’s okay to ask your partner to agree to a paternity test in the future, right? Because things might change later on. Just like the to-go bag.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:31 PM
1

traits such as success, wealth, confidence… Idk what you’re smoking but if a normal man got to date an attractive woman that’s successful, rich, and confident that’s the dream. Maybe stop projecting?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:24 PM
1

Women respect women who lose control of their emotions, whether it’s anger or any other emotion. I don’t know if the reverse is true for men though. Everyone seemed to respect Will Smith less when he lost his temper and smacked someone on stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 02:19 PM
3

Some of my friends feel the same way about women, because their family numbers are bad nuts. It’s hard to convince them otherwise :/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 01:51 PM
1

Ah, got it. So the right thing to do is to suggest a paternity test before having a child. To protect against cheating in the future. Just like how a to go bag is protection against the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/24 11:23 AM
1

Agreed. But what if your partner is not abusive? In that case getting a to-go bag is like accusing your partner of being abusive, sort of like a paternity test is accusing your partner of cheating?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 05:35 PM
3

I think OP’s point is that to go bags are the same as paternity tests? Since they mentioned both. It’s like how paternity test is an accusation that your partner is someone capable of cheating, and to-go bags is an accusation that your husband/wife is someone capable of that level of abuse that you need to run away. But in both cases, it’s not an accusation, but a just in case?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 05:32 PM
5

You’re not wrong. Often the men get charged with the physical crime and show up in the statistics, but women are accomplices which don’t show up in the statistics (accessory to murder etc). Also, I think it’s funny how feminists complain about bias in medicine when more people in the medicial field are women :’)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/24 06:47 AM
1

Yeah the perks are to make up for the negatives, otherwise very few would join the military. Going to war is not an easier job than doing Onlyfans imo
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/24 06:45 AM
10

This makes zero sense to me. Traditional gender roles are bad for capitalism, modern gender roles are more desirable for business. Tell me, if you were a company, would you want to pay a single employee a salary high enough so that he can support his entire family? Or do you want two employees working for you, and you pay them the same? Traditionally a man could support his family on one salary. But now both parents need to work. And if you still think men are the ruling class, do you think the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/24 04:46 AM
2

Um, what are the benefits of being in the military compared to sex work? I don’t think those in the veterans’ association are “privileged” for having been through war, nor is sex work as daunting as going through war. With the exception of forced sex work, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/24 02:36 AM
1

That used to be true to a large extent. There used to be discrimination in most fields, since women were not allowed to work or be educated. But we’ve turned that around now in many areas now. Now in the US and many other countries girls are actually more likely to go to college than boys. Teachers actually discriminate against boys now, with studies showing teachers giving a higher grade to an identical piece of work if it was gendered as a girl instead of as a boy. Feminism fought to turn that…
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:30 AM
1

Could you clarify out which part of my response suggested “brave” is a gendered trait? I used it to describe both men and women.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:24 AM
27

Not all men, but somehow always a man who’s saving your life. The brave firefighters saving someone’s child, the soldiers doing something heroic, even the random civilians risking their lives to save women and children. Not all men, but somehow always a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/24 02:19 AM
4

Divorce is not a good thing for anyone. But marriage might not be good for men, despite married men living longer or being happier than bachelors. Correlation doesn’t mean causation. It’s like how people who buy first class tickets are more likely to be rich. Does making a first class ticket make your rich, or does being rich allow you to buy first class tickets? Does being married make you a happy person, or does being a happy person make you more likely to be married? Are women more attracted …
/r/MensRights07/10/24 02:40 AM
–

I think one of the issues is that teachers are biased against boys in classrooms, and studies show that they give lower grades to identical pieces of work when it’s gendered as a boy instead of as a girl’s work. It’s sort of the reverse problem back when teachers discriminated against girls. The problem is that many people think we are still at that stage in education, when it’s now the reverse. There are still many incentives to boost girls and their college acceptance rates, when boys need it …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/24 01:42 AM
1

The root causation of women needing protection is men. Not true. The number of women dying from disease/fires/accidents/other causes is far higher than the number of women murdered by men. The problem is not all men I will admit, but it’s a large majority of you. Did you know that more than 90% of infanticides are committed by women? It’s not all women I will admit, but it’s a large majority of you. That’s a stupid way to think. The number of men who commit violence or threaten people are a mino…
/r/MensRights02/10/24 04:32 AM
3

I couldn’t agree with this more. I also hate that it’s always men vs women. We’re all just people together. It should be normal people vs misandrists/misogynists/other hateful people.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 04:20 AM
7

Same energy as “Men don’t need women, look at all the miserable single cat ladies, lmao they need us more than we need them, so don’t give in to lousy used up women etc” Guess femcels and incels think the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/24 02:04 AM
1

Nope, I learnt all my words from misandrist feminists as you can see above. Hence I only know how to use their own words against them.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 04:30 PM
15

There’s no way they’ll win the case for discrimination. When has a man ever won such a case? Only women win these things because they are a “marginalised” group lol.
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:45 AM
7

Well this goes against the narrative out there so of course it’s not mainstream :’)
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:45 AM
18

Misandry and violence against men is socially acceptable and even encouraged in situations like when your boyfriend is cheating. Imagine a music video where the guy beats his girlfriend bloody for suspected cheating lol
/r/MensRights01/10/24 10:44 AM
3

I’m pretty sure women also kill people and hurt people. What’s your point? You’re literally repeating what happened in my post lmao You’re completely deflecting my question lmao. Okay but who do women need protection from? Men. Seems like you answered your own question? What question did I deflect?
/r/MensRights01/10/24 09:46 AM
2

We need protection from a man because of a man/other men lol Right. And what about men who save women from hurricanes? Or the man who saved a woman and child from a sinking car? Or the man who saved this woman from an alligator? Men protect women from all sorts of danger lol. But maybe they shouldn’t, is that what you are saying?
/r/MensRights01/10/24 04:00 AM
3

I’m quite sure Kamala will win. Trump supporters are just a loud minority. Kamala’s campaign budget and media spend exceeds Trump’s by several hundred million. Plus her sponsors are mostly tech firms. The biggest sponsor (Google) outweighs Trump’s entire corporate sponsorship. Honestly I think the narrative that it’s close is just to motivate voters to go vote, just in case. And not like Trump is going dispute this and say he’s going to lose for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 08:46 AM
4

Don’t worry about the downvotes. I actually agree with you here. I’m sure the bravest women are much braver than the average man and woman. Sure, due to genetics and societal pressures there are more brave men running around risking their lives. But it doesn’t mean women can’t be brave too. That’s why we should judge someone on their own merits, not what is more or less common in their race, gender, or culture.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 08:26 AM
2

Yeah the wage gap is not calculated for the same work or hours. It’s just the average working female of that age group vs average working male.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 05:47 AM
10

Right? Even with the facts. Volunteer rates for the military and firefighters are far lower for women than men. It’s not like they are getting rejected, they aren’t even trying. It’s like saying the patriarchy is preventing me from exercising and eating healthy. Nah, that’s on you. The murders are committed by men. But looking at people being charged with being an accessory to murder, suddenly the number of women increases. Women are involved in a lot of crimes, but the physical action is done b…
/r/MensRights30/09/24 05:15 AM
12

And then when confronted with actual cases of women doing these things, they blame it on the men lol. “Oh it’s the patriarchal pressure.” “Oh she must be going through something, stop victim blaming.” I hate when people think like this. Literally how racists discriminated against minorities and justified their own actions.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 05:10 AM
11

Thanks for thinking about this! Good points, but I like to counter this counter-argument: A effective argument to combat your first statement would be: because the patriarchy never let women do those kinds of jobs. The number of women who sign up to be volunteer firefighters or voluntary military service is far, far lower than the number of men. That means far fewer women even make the attempt to enter such positions. Saying the patriarchy doesn’t let women join the military service is like sayi…
/r/MensRights30/09/24 05:00 AM
16

That’s it.. people who cite violent crime statistics (especially homicides) often fail to consider the accomplice to murder. When looking at people charged with being an accomplice to murder, suddenly women make up a higher percentage than before.
/r/MensRights30/09/24 02:33 AM
21

Yup, not all firefighters are men, and not all criminals are men!
/r/MensRights30/09/24 02:32 AM
5

It’s trained on data, so just a lot of misandrist nonsense out there.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 09:54 PM
2

I feel like feminism isn’t on the decline at all. That narrative might just be to justify the need for more feminist measures. Feminism is stronger than ever.
/r/MensRights29/09/24 03:53 AM
6

Yeah feminist subreddits are usually too heavily moderated. Anything the mods disagree with are “removed for derailing”. Much more open discussion here.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 01:59 AM
8

I get what you mean about not all feminists are part of a hate group. Honestly, feminism and MRAs have many parallels. There are some misandrists/misogynists. Men who think women shouldn’t be educated, and women who think men should face curfews and don’t believe in gender neutral laws. The only difference is that feminism is much more mainstream, even the radical versions. MRAs are treated as all misogynists, but not feminists. Misandry is much more socially acceptable than misogyny. Just look …
/r/MensRights28/09/24 01:58 AM
11

Just like how quite a few MRAs care about women’s issues. According to feminists themselves, feminism is not a egalitarian movement though.
/r/MensRights28/09/24 01:16 AM
8

I feel like I’ve met more men who are supportive though. But it might just be in these spaces. Women (often self-proclaimed feminists) can be supportive, but they usually aren’t. Just in another post here a woman was claiming only 1% of perpetrators are women, so it’s unlikely that a boy was raped by a woman. (1% is not true btw, this only comes from countries like UK where legally women cannot be charged with rape, except as an accomplice in joint enterprise)
/r/MensRights27/09/24 08:08 PM
22

Females account for 1% of rape perpetrators. Where did you get this statistic? According to the 2018 Family, Domestic and Sexual Violence in Australia Report, there were 4100 male victims of sexual violence that year. 55% reported a female perpetrator. This rate does not account for the fact that male victims are far less likely to make a report in the event of a female assailant. Are you getting the 1% from countries like UK? In those countries the rates are 0%, because women cannot be charged …
/r/MensRights27/09/24 07:57 PM
3

I like how they celebrate the 4B movement and then hate on MGTOW. Hypocrites as always.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:21 PM
92

Yes. In countries like Australia, where half the population uses their “marginalization” as an excuse to impose sexist laws. Did you know there is real discussion in Australian parliament of a curfew for all men only? In UK and many other Commonwealth countries, the law defines rape as being committed by a man. So male victims don’t get full justice as their female rapist cannot be charged with rape. In countries like Korea and Singapore, men have to start university or their careers two years l…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:15 PM
4

I don’t talk about this in real life. Feminists mostly don’t like having their minds changed so it’s impossible anyway.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:05 PM
68

Not to mention studies in Australia show that the same resume is more likely to be hired when identifying as a woman.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:01 PM
195

So says feminists. In Australia (where this is), how are women marginalised? Half of parliament is female. Studies show women are more likely to be hired (using the same resume). Seems this is an attempt to marginalise men instead.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 05:01 PM
9

Social media, mostly. MRAs were grouped with incels and misogynists. Came across this subreddit one day, read some posts/comments, realised most people here were pretty reasonable. Plus I realised that ironically those feminists preaching bad things about MRAs were themselves pretty hateful people.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:07 PM
3

What do you think about wives/husbands having a private bank account, or a “to go” bag?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 04:03 PM
4

Honestly, I see paternity tests the same way as a woman having a private bank account or “to go” bag. Are you accusing your husband of being financially abusive or physically abusive? No, it’s a just in case thing. Just like paternity tests.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/24 04:01 PM
14

That was me. People (self-proclaimed feminists especially) keep spreading the narrative that MRAs are not about men’s rights, and are all misogynistic. Had to find out for myself that that’s not true. It’s like saying all feminists are misandrists, even though a lot of them are, not all of them are.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 03:58 PM
1

Perhaps. Although quite a lot of feminists (evident from the comments) seem to hold this view. Honestly that’s fine by me. Feminists can focus on women’s issues and MRAs can focus on men’s issues. You can be both.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 04:49 AM
3

Feminism is not about men’s rights. Thinking that feminism is egalitarian is a misconception, according to feminists themselves
/r/MensRights26/09/24 04:52 PM
2

The 2% narrative is just rubbish and a twisted narrative. 2%-10% is the percentage of cases that get PROVEN false. It’s not that 98% of accusations get proven true. If that’s the case, victims have nothing to be afraid of right? Our justice system is so stunningly effective just for rape/sexual assault, that the conviction rate is higher than all other crimes? No, only a small percentage of cases get proven true as well. The vast majority of cases are “unsubstantiated”. It’s just twisted reporti…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 09:39 PM
3

I like how the 4B movement is portrayed as a good thing and something for feminists to be proud off, but when men do the exact same thing (MGTOW) then they get labelled as incels or misogynists or worse.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 08:08 AM
9

Thanks for sharing this. I’ll be sure to quote some of these studies the next time someone tells me women only have disadvantages, and men only have advantages in society. Is this what male privilege looks like?
/r/MensRights25/09/24 08:05 AM
7

Because she’s a woman.
/r/MensRights25/09/24 07:57 AM
3

I feel like only women say this lol. Easiest way to prove yourself right is to try it. Just put up a post and see for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 04:47 AM
1

Maybe these men and women themselves have no issues, but women online certainly seem to hate it lol. Go to AITAH and it’s so easy to find posts where the commenter rips the man apart because his gf is supporting him and what’s he contributing to the relationship? Like fr why do men and women need to contribute anything, if you’re attracted to each other that’s enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 10:26 PM
2

Exactly, just like there are many clubs where men spend money on good looking women. These men also seem to have no problem with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 10:23 PM
5

Your situation applies the same if the genders are reversed. Guys who grow up as ugly ducklings also get more attention when they have a “glow up”. They attract more attention by being more attractive. What’s wrong with that? Is it therefore okay for a good looking man to date a woman only for her money? And if he’ll leave her or discard her once she becomes broke? And let her pay all the bills and support him? You’re just using an excuse of a loud subset of men to hate all men. They comment a l…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 10:09 PM
9

If a guy confesses that he’s only with his partner for sex he’ll definitely get dragged through the comments lol. Try pretending to be a guy and make a post on AITAH saying “Am I the AH because I’m only with my gf for sex?” You’ll see for yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/24 10:05 PM
2

Thanks for this!
/r/MensRights20/09/24 04:30 PM
9

Just generally speaking I feel like in third world countries women have it worse, whereas in first world countries women have it better in terms of social and economic support. I feel like the efforts for women’s rights should focus on third world countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/24 07:06 AM
11

That’s crazy. I think a few kids were killed too :( Has Israel stepped forward to claim responsibility or have they found evidence that Israel was behind this yet? I couldn’t find it online.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/24 04:17 AM
23

I’m a little confused, what’s happening here? Any links to articles etc so I can read up about this?
/r/EverydayMisandry18/09/24 02:29 AM
5

Thank you!
/r/MensRights18/09/24 02:22 AM
-1

So if my fiancée asks me to get insurance or buys insurance for me, she’s planning to kill me or give me a terminal illness? You’re saying paternity tests = cheating because that’s how you see it. Let me put it another way. My partner and I have each other’s phone password. If I change my phone password, she’ll probably ask for it if she realises. Is she accusing me of cheating? Why should my partner have access to my phone? Doing a paternity test after the hospital is also a just in case for BO…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 07:06 PM
-3

Hey, just wanted to say that it’s nice to see a friendly feminist! Too many misandrists adopt the title of “feminist” and give the whole movement a bad name, just like how misogynists give MRAs a bad rep. Also wanna acknowledge your frustrations with the censorship. It’s like they don’t want healthy discussion! I’ve even received auto-ban notifications from unrelated subs like InterestingAsFuck simply for joining this sub. Have to quit the sub and message the mods to get unbanned. Now I have to …
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:55 PM
17

The worse case for her is manslaughter. But realistically she’s probably only going to get charged with negligible, young girls rarely get found guilty on a severe charge.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:40 PM
1

Lmao, doesn’t even need to be a progressive woman. There is 1 or less fatal rhino attacks each year globally. But hundreds of thousands of men maimed, killed or assaulted by women. Also, it ends at death with the rhino. If it’s a woman and she kills you, she might come out and accuse you of some deviant act so she had to defend herself. Plenty of female serial killers accuse their initial victims falsely to plead self defence. Not to mention she might actually sexually assault you herself. How m…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 06:38 PM
-2

I don’t think it’s an accusation. I feel like it’s like insurance, just in case the hospital fucked up, or maybe your partner cheated. You can get insurance because you assume you’ll die, or as a just in case. You can get a test because you assume your partner cheated/hospital fucked up, or as a just in casez
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:30 AM
2

Why is it an accusation of cheating? It’s rare but there’s been cases of hospitals messing up babies, so honestly I see it as a just in case thing. Do you get insurance because you assume you’ll die, or just in case? Do you get a test because you assume your partner is cheating or the hospital fucked up, or just in case?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 10:28 AM
12

In countries such as UK and India, women cannot be charged with rape as the legal definition of rape involves a penis. In countries like Korea and Singapore and Ukraine, men are forcibly drafted into the military. Even during peacetime you have to start tertiary education two years behind your female peers. In Singapore only women are entitled to alimony. Men can only get alimony if you are disabled. Lmao this is a society built for men? If so I’ll gladly let things be reversed and live in a soc…
/r/MensRights17/09/24 07:30 AM
1

Agreed :’)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 04:36 AM
1

Are you saying stereotypes are okay if statistics suggest so? because racism isn’t based on facts Statistically, black people and hispanics are over represented in both fatal and non-fatal violent crime, based on FBI data from 2018. Do you think this justifies racism? Personally I don’t think we should consider the average black person or Hispanic as more likely to commit violent crime, even though statistically this is true. I don’t think these statistics justify saying “I hate black people/His…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 04:02 AM
11

I know you personally don’t seem to endorse this. But seeing women say “I hate men” in response to seeing something bad done by a man, has the exact same vibes as “I hate black people” in response to seeing something bad done by a black person.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/24 03:53 AM
3

Studies backing OP’s observations: A hiring study conducted across multiple countries found found no sign of discrimination against women, but discrimination against men in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the UK. Another study found that women are preferred in feminine-typed occupations while men do not enjoy higher hiring likelihoods in masculine-typed occupations. We also find that female employers are more susceptible to the female hiring bias compared to male employers.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 10:56 PM
5

For reference: A hiring study conducted across multiple countries found found no sign of discrimination against women, but discrimination against men in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the UK. Another study found that women are preferred in feminine-typed occupations while men do not enjoy higher hiring likelihoods in masculine-typed occupations. We also find that female employers are more susceptible to the female hiring bias compared to male employers.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 10:55 PM
8

Found some studies for reference: A hiring study conducted across multiple countries found found no sign of discrimination against women, but discrimination against men in Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, and the UK. Another study found that women are preferred in feminine-typed occupations while men do not enjoy higher hiring likelihoods in masculine-typed occupations. We also find that female employers are more susceptible to the female hiring bias compared to male employers.
/r/MensRights13/09/24 10:55 PM
2

they are actually less accepting of outsiders than men Women are less accepting, here’s a study on the stronger ingroup bias in women compared to men
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 01:45 PM
1

“Punish people who buy drugs, rather than people who are lured into selling it.” Lmao the logic here.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:07 AM
0

I don’t think you should judge all MRMs. Just like how some feminists can be misandrists, some MRMs can be misogynistic. But this shouldn’t reflect the movement as a whole. Both feminists and MRMs want gender equality, there’s no point in either gender being “against” the other’s issues. Just like feminism, many men’s issues affect women as well. For example, in modern countries such as UK, the law stipulates that only a man can commit rape. This means that both male and female victims raped by …
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:03 AM
1

Thats what you are intimating…it’s more than 10% which has to mean there is more false self reporting. You mean “implying”? “Imitating” means “to copy”. I’m not sure what you’re talking about. Are you talking about self-reporting in a study? Because I have no idea what the rate of false or true self reports are in those. And just FYI, self-report studies are not 100% accurate. People do lie on those as well. But again, I’m not talking about those at all. I’ve only been talking about the cases re…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 08:26 PM
11

Part of the reason is that many people think false accusations are rare, and cite a rate of 2-10%. This is a misconception These 2-10% refer to cases that are proven false, for example, when there is video evidence or when the accuser confesses. The other 90-98% are not proven true, otherwise our legal system would be almost perfect. The majority of other accusations are unsubstantiated, for example, if the accuser gives inconsistent testimony. These are not considered true or false, just unsubs…
/r/MensRights23/08/24 07:19 PM
17

Just more hypocrisy, nothing new :’)
/r/MensRights23/08/24 07:11 PM
2

I’m not sure where you’re getting the idea that I think women who self-report are lying. I don’t think that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 06:11 PM
–

The male equivalent of “you’re just jealous!” is “you’re just insecure” etc when you offer some critique. Either way it’s a low form of conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 08:13 AM
1

I never said most rapes are false. Why would you think something like that? I just said most accusations are unsubstantiated (not proven true or false) so we don’t know the true rate of false accusations. That’s just a fact. FYI, if you’ve ever handled rape cases, it’s not necessary to sit in trial or have a rape kit done at all. You can go to a police station and spend 30 minutes making a report, and then refuse to cooperate further. The police will still bring the suspect in for investigation.…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 05:24 AM
1

Many other countries have no privatisation of prisons and still a bias in favor of women. Lesser jail time and less women in prison for the same crimes. I don’t think privatisation can explain that…
/r/MensRights23/08/24 05:16 AM
1

False accusations are not rare, we don’t know the true rate. The estimated 2-10% of false cases are proven false, where the accuser confesses or other evidence such as video evidence exists. It’s not that 90-98% of accusations are proven true in court, otherwise the legal system would be perfect and victims would have nothing to be afraid of, would they? Only 10-20% of accusations get proven true, 2-10% get proven false. The vast majority are unsubstantiated. This means the cases are dropped wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 08:52 PM
15

I have never seen anti-refugee sentiment based on the premise that they will somehow steal potential partners?? Like who thinks oh those poor, penniless, starved war refugees must be so sexually attractive to local women? Do you have an example of this trend anywhere? Usually anti-refugee sentiment has something to do with security, finances etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 08:47 PM
3

Isn’t it about supply and demand? There’s little demand for female jails because women are treated more leniently in court. They receive shorter sentences and are less likely to receive jail time for the same crimes, even when controlling for other legal factors. You can’t really blame privatisation for this, that doesn’t make sense. Why would private prison operators turn down the opportunity to make money from female prisons if there was demand? It’s just that there isn’t a demand for it.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 08:27 PM
8

It’s pretty serious. Just being in this subreddit for men’s rights gets you automatically banned from many mainstream subreddits, regardless of the content of your comments. Just heavy censorship in favor of feminism. I use an alt account just to comment and browse here and support men’s rights.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 08:21 PM
5

Both genders face issues, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with looking out for a gender’s rights. But sometimes this escalates to discrimination, which is why many feminists are also misandrists. Of course, men can be similarly biased too. But research has shown that women are inherently more biased towards their own groups. Another thing is that feminism aims to censor a lot of MRA conversations. Case in point, you get modded on a feminist subreddit but not here. I think women face issues …
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:33 PM
15

You get banned from a lot of subreddits simply for commenting or even just joining this subreddit. It’s how they censor MRA conversations.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:25 PM
18

So the Australian government thinks women drivers are worse at parking than men….?
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:23 PM
1

It’s pretty much the constitution everywhere including US, Korea, and Singapore that only men get conscripted by default. That’s the problem. The whole world is sexist, not just Ukraine.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:33 PM
3

So being against the draft in Ukraine means being a Russian supporter??? If you are against the civilian casualties caused by Israel, are you therefore a Hamas supporter and pro-terrorism? It’s pretty childish to think in such black and white terms, that “one side bad = other side perfect”. No, in the real world all the parties involved can do good things and bad things. Putin can be a warmongering asshole, but drafting only men in Ukraine can be problematic at the same time. Just because it’s b…
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:30 PM
2

So real. Any woman who isn’t “a heroine that campaigns against the draft” is complicit and in support of the male draft and war. Genius logic.
/r/MensRights18/08/24 03:18 PM
38

Two things can be true at once. War can be horrible, and the draft can also be a men’s right issue. If a problem disproportionately affects women, then it’s a women’s issue, right? The draft disproportionately affect men, so it’s a men’s right issue. Or do you think that there’s no women’s issues either, only societal ones? You say women are just damsels in distress and shouldn’t be sent to war. Okay, so how can these damsels be allowed to have an equal say when they are not equal in capability?…
/r/MensRights16/08/24 03:47 AM
3

Possibly. I personally don’t know any research on women being more commitment-oriented than men but it could contribute to these trends on relationships, if true. Worth a study imo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 03:26 PM
25

Men and women can both be cynical, so ignore the cynics. Thanks for the post OP, appreciate the support :)
/r/MensRights15/08/24 03:24 PM
9

Lesbian couples have the highest divorce rates, usually around 20-30% more than heterosexual couples. Gay couples have the lowest rates. Are women more abusive to each other than men then?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 10:53 AM
24

This is a question of correlation vs causation. “Married men are happier, so getting married must make men happy.” “First-class passengers are richer, so buying a first-class ticket makes you rich.” So correlation doesn’t establish which came first. It makes more sense that first-class passengers are richer and therefore buy first-class. It could also be that happier men make more attractive partners, hence more of them are married. It could also be a spurious correlation. Let’s say ice cream sa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/24 10:51 AM
6

I don’t understand the rant either. She says women are expected to lead, to have money, to be brave and I’m like??? That sounds more like being a man, when are these things expected of women? When are more women expected to pay for dates or be the main breadwinner in the family?? Also if women are expected to lead then how can they claim society doesn’t allow women to lead????
/r/MensRights07/07/24 05:59 PM
5

Do you have a source for that? Because feminists and women’s rights groups oppose making the rape laws gender neutral. Here’s an example. To quote one of the feminists in the article: “unlike in existing law where the accused is male, the Committee recommendations if enacted into a proposed new Bill, will make it possible for women to be charged with these offences. This is wholly unacceptable,”
/r/MensRights04/07/24 08:03 AM
28

That laws are biased. In UK, Singapore, India and many countries, legally a woman cannot rape a man, since the definition of rape involves penetration with a penis. In countries like Singapore and some states in the US, only women or disabled husbands are entitled to alimony. (This is bad for women as well, since why should the man risk his career with no alimony?) Countries like Korea and Singapore have mandatory conscription for all men even in peacetime, for military training. So they start t…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 09:01 PM
7

Exactly. It’s vice versa too. Men are also attracted to what they are and there’s no choice in it for them. All the logical arguments and guilt tripping won’t change this. Both men and women have their innate standards about looks, personality, body count and whatever other values. There’s no point trying to argue that these should change.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 08:54 PM
6

Just woman vs bear lol. Women kill hundreds of thousands more men than bears every year. Women also rape men. And it stops at death with the bear. A woman can lie that she attacked you in self defense and ruin your reputation even after she kills you. Exact same logic lol.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 08:52 PM
3

What kind of culture do you live in? Please get out.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 12:34 PM
51

Misandry is in the legal system. Countries like UK has rape laws where only men can actually commit rape, so if you get raped by a woman then they get a much lesser charge of sexual assault, which carries a much shorter jail term. Countries like Singapore only provides alimony for wives, or crippled husbands. Misandry is real and hurts people. Hurts women too. More pressure on women to stay home and give up their career, since they can get alimony if they split.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/24 03:23 AM
2

Must have been a Welsh sleeper agent
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:16 AM
1

That’s like saying all feminists are about tearing men down rather than advocating for women. Why would any man support the views of someone like Valerie Solanas? There are healthy MRAs too, like Warren Farrell, who is also a prominent feminist. There are plenty of healthy feminists and MRAs, just like there are toxic feminists and MRAs.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 01:13 AM
3

According to the CDC, over the same period there were 1270000 female rape victims, and 1267000 male rape victims. That’s a difference of 0.002%. But only the figure for female rape cases were reported. Can be found here under “sexual violence”
/r/MensRights24/06/24 08:27 PM
2

Perhaps. Pity we don’t have any statistics on this pre-marital relationships. My guess is because it makes more sense for research funding to focus on longer relationships, like marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:25 PM
2

Sure. But in long term relationships (marriage) the woman is far more likely to dump their partner, whether their partner is a man or woman. Perhaps the stats for shorter relationships like boyfriends/girlfriends are different. But at least I have a related source. More than what can be said for the original claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 08:23 PM
1

Yes. A lot of feminists are men. My fiancé and I both support women’s rights. Very few men’s right activists are women though.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 01:46 PM
2

First off, dumb dumb is an adorable expression LOL. Well, I have seen more women dating men and then leaving them when it’s not working. It could be that both of us are correct depending on the area that we live in. But both our experiences are anecdotal, meaning what we see or think doesn’t necessarily reflect reality, unless there are statistics to back it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 01:44 PM
1

I agree and I hope that most women don’t think that. But posts like these still get many thousands of likes on social media like TikTok. I guess it’s like the converse side of those hardcore incel content. Both men and women can pick up extremist views. It’s sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 01:42 PM
2

Exactly. These can harm women too, which is why men’s rights also affect women. Gender equality benefits both men and women. Isn’t that supposed to be the whole point of feminism?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 09:59 AM
17

Actually, most divorces are initiated by women in heterosexual relationships. Even among gay and lesbian couples, the lesbian divorce rate is much higher than gay couples, lesbians are more than twice as likely to get a divorce. So women leave their girlfriends all the time, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 07:02 AM
6

Actually, most divorces are initiated by women in heterosexual relationships. Even among gay and lesbian couples, the lesbian divorce rate is much higher than gay couples, lesbians are more than twice as likely to get a divorce. So women leave their girlfriends (and boyfriends) all the time, not men.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 07:02 AM
1

Well that certainly backfired. Because try making a post on social media saying you’ll abort a girl and see what kind of backlash you get. Meanwhile the posts about aborting boys get hundreds of thousands of likes and plenty of “same tbh” or “risky repost”. Sounds like the sentiments have switched completely. Also, those posts say “aborting my baby if it’s a boy so I don’t raise a rapist” so I’m pretty sure it has nothing to do with baby girls in third-world countries. Stop denying misandry, it’…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 05:12 AM
3

I’m sorry if you live in one of those countries. Gender equality is definitely at a different pace in many developing countries. There’s still a lot of progress to be made there. Meanwhile in first-world countries like Singapore only women can receive alimony, and husbands cannot. This incentivises pressure on the woman to give up their career instead. In countries like the UK, female rapists cannot be charged under the law as it only defines males as rapists. Female circumcision has been eradic…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 05:01 AM
46

I agree with you completely. A lot of feminists nowadays are too focused on getting angry instead of gender equality. Why is the label important? Can I call myself a feminist and go out there and start discriminating against women? What matters is how you behave and what you believe. There’s a lot of rights that women have, which men don’t. In modern countries like Singapore, only women are entitled to alimony. In countries like England, women cannot be charged with rape. Vice versa too, especia…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 07:14 PM
0

What kind of content do you support? I see misandrist content because I follow some feminist creators and content (healthy ones) and I guess the algorithm just mixes it all together. I guess you follow a lot of men’s rights content? Maybe that’s why misogynist stuff gets pushed to you. Hate exists everywhere I guess. I hate this gender war.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:14 PM
-6

Right? I’ve seen women say those things many dozens of times both on the internet and in real life. Not that I haven’t seen misogyny either. But nowadays it’s a lot more rare because we all shut it down pretty quickly. But I heard and see a lot of misandrist jokes and it makes me pretty uncomfortable.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:09 PM
7

I see them a lot on TikTok though. They get hundreds of thousands of likes. Redpill content I see a lot less and those get maybe hundreds (or a thousand) likes at best. Maybe a couple of years ago when Andrew Tate was viral. But nowadays misandrist content seems to be trending a lot more than red pill content.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:07 PM
3

Apparently there are a roughly equal number of male and female victims of rape
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/06/24 06:05 PM
2

Women take the same thing personally too. They always get triggered when you say you’d choose the bear over a random woman. Like duh, it’s the exact same reason. Way more men raped/killed by women than bears. And it ends at death with the bear, it wouldn’t make false accusations and ruin your reputation after it kills you.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:03 PM
7

There’s plenty of women saying things like “if my baby was a boy I would abort it” or “men shouldn’t be allowed to come out after 7pm” and the comments are all in favor of it. Not sure if you consider those “mild”. I think abortion based on gender and curfews are pretty unhinged.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:00 PM
-2

I’ve only heard women say most of these when making misandrist jokes though. Which man has ever said “You only have rights because we give them to you?”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 05:58 PM
24

So the main argument for going back to a patriarchy is because men are stronger…? A society based on physical strength is pretty tribal and outdated lmao. Is your boss physically stronger than you? Should our government leaders be elected with an arm-wrestling match? Only allowing physically stronger people to lead you makes zero sense. Arranged marriages was part of the patriarchy btw. And I don’t think abortions or contraceptives are the problem with today’s relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 02:31 AM
1

I have answers But unable to provide any source or links. Clearly just making shit up. Pathetic lol stop wasting my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 02:20 AM
3

If you had reviewed the ATS results you would see that somehow men also report more time spent on leisure. I think that’s where differences in how men and women report their time and what they consider work or leisure comes into play. But that’s all speculation. That is an interesting speculation. So it could be that all of these participants got their working hours wrong. And in the ATS study it clearly outlines specific leisure activities such as watching TV, reading etc, so I’m not sure how d…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 08:04 PM
1

Lmao, imagine just throwing terms like strawman when you have no response. My reply was very clear. What’s ‘strawman’ about asking for a source? That was my very first point. Do you even know what a strawman is? Provide a source or you’re making shit up. Did you know that all lesbians say men are better? Two can play at that game. Now stay quiet if you have nothing useful/real to say other than misinformation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:57 PM
3

Maybe chores take less time nowadays compared to 1990s? Or do you think everyone’s household is messier nowadays? And why are women still spending less time on work + chores than the time men spend on work alone??? On top of what the woman does the man still has to do 10 extra hours of chores more than the woman? Are women just not that efficient, or do they just not want to work as many hours? Stop playing the gender war game please. There’s no point comparing here if at the end of the day the …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:55 PM
0

It’s not. There’s nothing wrong with being better single. But stop blaming the man in the relationship for no reason. Statistically, women’s relationships suck even more if there isn’t a man involved. Men’s relationships are better without a woman involved. So unless lesbians are somehow worse than heterosexual people, and gay people are somehow better, then it’s not the man causing the unhappiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:50 PM
0

Do you have sources or are you just making shit up? Also, following this logic, a higher percentage of straight couples have open relationships than lesbian couples too right? If open relationships leads to more success, it should be gay > straight > lesbian. Actually, husbands on average spend 43 hours per week on work alone and 10 more hours on chores. Women spend an average of 43 hours total for work AND chores. So actually the average husband spends more time supporting the family through wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:45 PM
2

You don’t think it would have been more misleading to say “women on average picked up 16 more hours of paid work while men dropped 3!” when men were working more to begin with? Exactly, which is why the study did not report it that way. It gave the hours before and after (9 to 25 hours of work for women; 46 to 43 hours for men). It’s super biased to report increases or percentages without knowing the base. Did you know I ate 300% more doughnuts than I did yesterday? I ate 1 yesterday and 3 today…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:36 PM
14

That makes zero sense. The study was extremely clear using the bar graphs. Your calculations are misleading. Because you didn’t calculate the percentage based on increase (men spend 150% more hours doing chores now). Nor did you calculate the percentage using total hours per week (women spend 10% of total hours in a week doing chores and 15% working, total 25%. Men spend 25% of the total hours in a week just for work). Instead you got the percentages by taking the hours over the total hours that…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 05:07 AM
-1

Please read the study linked. It was an incredibly biased way of reporting the stats not used in the original study, but calculated by OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:08 AM
18

What an incredibly biased way to report the stats in the study you linked. This is not how the study reported this stats at all. You’re purposing reporting your own calculated percentage instead of the hours the study used. Men spend a smaller percentage of their hours on chores because they spend 70% of their hours working. Now why don’t you calculate that? You’ve also failed to mention that men spend 61 hours per week on childcare, household chores and work, but women only spend 57. The study …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:07 AM
1

Considering gay couples have the lowest separation rates and highest reported happiness/satisfaction, and lesbian couples have the highest separation rates and lowest reported happiness/satisfaction, maybe women should have a lower bar for men or for each other? Heterosexual couples are in between those groups, btw. But men do report higher satisfaction and woman initiate most divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:50 AM
8

Apparently 4B is a small femcel movement that’s not really popular in Korea itself. It has about 3400 members, or about 0.00006% of the population. It’s really popular on western social media though.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:56 PM
1

Actually, women do have a stronger in-group bias, whereas men don’t show this automatic bias
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:34 PM
19

It’s because women have an in-group bias towards other women, but men don’t
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:33 PM
1

I mean, it’s not illegal. But it’s a kink that’s easy to make fun of, whether the Cuck is a girl or guy. Same with piss kinks or whatever. To each their own, but don’t judge me for judging.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:28 PM
–

Yup. Experiment 1 showed that women have this natural bias, whereas men don’t. Experiments 2 and 3 focused on why women have this bias, is it due to maternal bonding and/or gender stereotypes? Experiment 4 looks at why men lack this bias towards their own gender. Would sexual experience predict a bias in men towards women?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 10:18 AM
5

I’m sorry you had to go through all of that, but I’m glad you made it out :’)
/r/MensRights19/06/24 06:52 AM
–

Studies have shown that women have an ingroup bias towards other women, but men don’t have this automatic bias towards other men. So that could be why.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 06:47 AM
39

Interesting how we have that stereotype when more cases of abuse/neglect are perpetrated by mothers. “Importantly, most such individuals who perpetrated child maltreatment were parents (77.2%), with 37.6% of the cases involving mothers acting alone and 23.6% fathers acting alone. Another fifth of the cases (20.7%) involved both mothers and fathers acting together to co-perpetrate child maltreatment.”
/r/MensRights19/06/24 04:29 AM
7

By their own logic, if only 1-2% of reports are proven false, then victims should have complete faith in the justice system, right? 98-99% of all reports are proven true by the justice system! Except, no. Most sources report “false” allegation rates of 2-13%. As in proven false. But if you open these studies up you’ll find that the rest are not “proven true”, only 5-15% of cases are proven true. The vast majority of cases are “unsubstantiated”, meaning dropped due to lack of evidence or uncooper…
/r/MensRights19/06/24 04:21 AM
1

That’s fair. I guess it depends on which part of the world you stay in. Interestingly enough, Maslow’s Hierarchy has some relation to feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 04:06 AM
1

Let’s agree to disagree then. You’re right in that there are practical issues like housing and healthcare, but I think misogyny and misandry are also issues that need to be addressed, even though they don’t always exist physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 10:39 PM
1

You’re definitely right in that men and women can just be platonic friends. Just wanted to point out that a similar number of men and women in an experiment misinterpreted attraction cues (meaning they thought there were signs of flirtation but there wasn’t). 9% for women, 12% for men Another study suggested that “72% of college women and 60% of college men reported that someone of the opposite sex had misperceived their friendliness as a sexual come-on.”
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 10:30 PM
10

Most studies put false cases (proven false) at 2-13%, and true cases (proven true) at about 5-15%. The rest are “unsubstantiated”, meaning there wasn’t enough evidence to proceed or the witnesses were being inconsistent in their statements. So honestly we don’t know about the majority of rape/sexual assault allegations.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:25 PM
24

Firstly, these posts do exist, such as this one talking about removing all men from their lives. You can sort posts by controversial. You’ll also notice that subreddits like AskFeminists are very heavily-policed. Try scrolling to the bottom of the posts there and see how many comments are removed. Now go to r/MensRights or related subs and see how many comments are removed. It’s easy to be cordial in an echo chamber, since everyone is agreeing with you, and any disagreement is removed. Have you …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/24 10:18 PM
1

I see women here scream constantly about men’s behaviour in relationships too. But I know better than to assume all women or feminists are like that. Individual preferences can problematic. You don’t think it’s problematic when men prefer their partners do more chores, be a virgin, be submissive/obedient or other misogynistic preferences? Shouldn’t we teach future generations not to have such preferences? Or does it not matter since it’s their individual preferences?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 10:08 PM
15

I’m sorry, when you said female circumcision I thought you were talking about outdated practices. If you care about female circumcision so much, why don’t you go protest some small tribes in Africa? Female circumcision and male castration are only practiced in very few tribes in Africa and Asia respectively, today. Male circumcision is still a thing though. How many men compared to women around you are circumcised? In the US, Europe, and Asia, how many more boys/infants are circumcised compared …
/r/MensRights18/06/24 10:04 PM
14

Male genital mutilation arguably is worse. Ever heard of eunuchs? What about a castrato - a person who is castrated to retain their singing voice in the opera? Thankfully, extreme forms of male and female genital mutilation are rare today in modern society. But while modern society doesn’t practice female circumcision, male circumcision is still commonly accepted and practiced in many modern Muslim or Jewish families.
/r/MensRights18/06/24 09:38 PM
1

A lot of assumptions here about men and women without a source. Who says men can’t be single or find someone more compatible? Most women seem to have a lot to say about how men behave in relationships when it’s none of their business. See how unproductive such generalizations are? Another issue is that you think expectations are harmless. They’re not. Expecting a man to foot most of the bills means that as a society, we expect men to make more money than women. How can we achieve equal pay when …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 09:30 PM
–

This second study also suggest similar rates among men and women. “72% of college women and 60% of college men reported that someone of the opposite sex had misperceived their friendliness as a sexual come-on.” Even the lowest figure quoted in your own study says 53% (more than half) of men reported women misinterpreting them. Are you reading these studies?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 07:56 AM
10

Why don’t women facing misogyny move somewhere where there’s less misogyny? This seems more like a cultural difference than an actual problem. /s And some of OP’s points are actually about the patriarchy, which means it affects women too. How can we ever expect women to receive equal wages and treatment if we, as a society, believe in men getting paid more and having to protect us? Seems like more than just a cultural problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:26 AM
4

Pretty much this. Women also tend to get angry at you after being turned down for some reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:11 AM
–

Makes a lot of sense. I guess the same thing applies to women. It’s not that “nice guys finish last”, it’s that being a doormat in the hopes of getting what you want is a bad strategy. Just communicate with your partner and set fair expectations etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:09 AM
–

According to the study you linked, men made this mistake ~12% of the time, and women made this mistake ~9% of the time. So I guess it’s pretty similar?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:04 AM
9

ALL citizens (regardless of gender) ages 18-26 would be automatically registered for selective service Huh? Do you have a source for that? The bill seems to automatically register men for the draft, not women
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:32 PM
5

Maybe if you think physical strength still defines power in society. Are the most powerful individuals who control you and order you around all physically stronger than you? What makes you afraid of them/obey them? If a man gets physical with you at least you can fight back. If a woman gets physical with you would you even dare to fight back as a man? And face the legal/societal consequences?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 04:40 AM
1

Yeah. Also as another user pointed out, the one I found doesn’t even link the journal, so I have no idea if it’s even a real study or the same study OP is talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 04:31 AM
5

Very true, and it doesn’t give a proper citation with the article title so we’ll never know if it’s a real study or not :/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 08:26 AM
6

Maybe this?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 05:54 AM
12

Is he talking about this one? It’s 68% for women and 74% for men, seems pretty similar to me across genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 05:54 AM
–

I knew it, women were just pretending to be chaste, and they were actually creeps trying to get laid all along >:( On a serious note, I think you know what I mean. In most societies you probably would expect it to be a little easier for girls to get a date than for a guy to get a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 08:45 PM
9

No, I’m referring to the part in the post where she said “my brother, as a male…” in the same post where she is explaining why it is offensive never to call someone “a female.” I get what you mean about using the terms as adjectives. Personally I don’t feel one way or another even if someone calls me a male, but it’s also weird to call use male or female to refer to a person (to me). So I’m on the fence about that. But just seems hypocritical to call someone “a male” if you’re gonna be offended …
/r/MensRights10/06/24 08:38 PM
–

Not saying I agree but I think the point was not that “women are great at this and men suck at this”, but more that “it’s easier for women and harder for men.” Same reason we go “First woman to accomplish…!” So what, she’s not the first person to do it. But sometimes things are harder to achieve as a woman. Like imagine being the first woman to win a Nobel Prize! It’s not that women suck at physics, but it’s worth noting because of the societal pressures against her. Same point being made here, …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 08:20 PM
1

Okay. Again, I’ve cited medical journals opposing your humble opinion. Maybe write in to those journals if you think your opinion is more correct than the published articles? Perhaps you were involved in HPV research or vaccine development? Also, you’re wrong about HPV affecting more women than men. According to the CDC, men have higher rates of HPV compared to women. They are also at much higher risks of certain cancers from HPV especially oral cancers. So in your own words, they should have fo…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 07:44 PM
1

In your earlier comment you said that 1) the effect of the vaccine for women doesn’t equate to the same effect for men, now you’re saying that we need to see the effects of the vaccine in women first to understand the effects in men. Also, your main justification for waiting is the monetary cost. Of course it’s cheaper to run one set of clinicial trials and then build on that for the other gender. Why do you think women having been complaining about gender equality in medicine for years? It’s sa…
/r/MensRights10/06/24 09:25 AM
7

Actually, this meta-review of multiple studies shows that men help strangers more often, and women receive more help. However, it should be noted that this difference was not present in all studies, and cannot be conclusive due to different scenarios across studies. So it’s probably safe to say that men are (sometimes) more helpful, but in general men and women are probably equally helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 06:55 PM
3

Again, I think you’re conflating history with current affairs. Historically, women were more uneducated. Do you still think women are uneducated? OP is complaining about current treatment of men, so that should be treated on its merits. For example, are the statements “kill all men” and “kill all women” equally acceptable on social media? Did you know that legally in countries such as UK and Singapore, women cannot commit rape, only men? What about conscription in Ukraine, is it fair to force on…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 06:44 PM
2

I don’t think you should look at history as a way of justifying what is acceptable now, Hitler was also fond of using that argument. Does it mean that in a few decades time we can go back to oppressing women if they are oppressing men now? Are you saying the actions of someone’s ancestors justifies their actions today?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 03:40 PM
1

Okay, a lot to unpack here. So you’re saying gay people chose to be gay, when they could have just chosen to be straight? I’m not going to comment on if religion is good or bad because I’m a freethinker myself and I don’t want to disrespect other people’s religions, whether is Christianity or Islam. You don’t have to dislike women and like men to support men’s rights. Just like not all feminists are lesbians, no? Plenty of happily functioning adults believe in gender equality for both.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:30 AM
6

I get what you mean. Personally I also think this woman, while foolish, is a victim. The system was designed to trap people that way. Someone else might feel differently, and that’s okay because it’s a personal opinion. But I think the main issue is the double standard in the media. A man falling for a love scam is not portrayed as a victim, obviously.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:54 AM
7

You should have asked them why they didn’t speak up when you said “male”instead of “man, but only when using “female” instead of “women”. I’m so curious!
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:36 AM
1

Ok, personally I don’t believe that sexual orientation is a choice. That’s the main argument against why choosing to be gay is a sin. Yes, men commit most violent crimes, as I said. But more victims of violent crime are men…? Also, regarding domestic violence: “The CDC's National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey during 2016-2017 found that in the United States, 42.3% of men and 42.0% of women reported having experienced physical violence by an intimate partner in their lifetime. For s…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:29 AM
9

I like to point out that in this review only 1 study done in 1994 in Switzerland had a rate of 0.8%. The study says that due to advancements in genetics, parental discrepancy is now more accurately measured. According to the words of the study: “For studies based on populations chosen for reasons other than parental discrepancy, median PD is 3.7% (IQR = 2%-9.6%)” In short, general samples for the population is about 3.7%, or about 1 in 25.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:19 AM
2

If you think sexual orientation is a choice, then yes I guess that makes sense. Actually, men need to be protected more since the majority of victims of violent crime are men. Not sure where you are getting your stats from. You are also not more likely to be attacked by someone you know, most violent crime happens with a stranger, unless you are taking about domestic violence or homicides in particular. Women do report higher rates of domestic violence by an intimate partner (again, with lesbian…
/r/MensRights09/06/24 05:05 AM
2

I don’t know, lesbian couples have the highest rates of domestic violence and gay couples the lowest in recent studies. Seems like women are becoming violent all by themselves.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:29 PM
6

Actually, plenty of studies suggest women receive more lenient sentences than men. Here’s one, and here’s another
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:25 PM
1

No, I think you’re misunderstanding the point here from me and the commenter above. Neither of us are suggesting that the same vaccine developed for women should be given to men on the assumption it works, I’m not sure where you gathered that. The development for men’s HPV vaccines started later than it should have, despite the cancer risks of HPV in men already being apparent. That’s the point. Also, despite the vaccine being gender neutral now, healthcare providers still provide less consisten…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:17 PM
0

That’s a fair point. But it’s not that more reports are made by females (which is also the case), it’s that among a similar number of male and female victims, female victims are more likely to report the crime. Which could be due to the toxic culture, as you said.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 07:38 AM
13

No, I think the point was that the actual development and testing started way later than it should have, despite evidence suggesting it should have started. It’s the exact same problem that women used to face (and still face) in some areas of medicine.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 07:27 AM
2

In developing countries or those with religious governments (Middle East, Southeast Asia) etc the women still lack many rights. Also in some states with anti-abortion laws that’s not ideal. But in most modern societies probably not. They still have the biological disadvantage of being physically weaker and having to bear children but many feminists make this a societal thing (Men vs bear etc) Many studies show that in many countries in Europe and states in the US, women have an advantage/bias wh…
/r/MensRights07/06/24 07:05 AM
3

I agree with you, I’ve never understood why people see it like that either. Too many people use this statistic as a way to say that majority of the allegations are true, when in reality a small percentage are proven false, a small percentage are proven true, and the vast majority is simply unsubstantiated. I also agree with your stance about treatment of both the accuser and accused. That’s way it should be isn’t it? We should provide safe spaces and channels for potential victims, and at the sa…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 08:42 AM
2

Men and women both have advantages and disadvantages in certain areas. One example of men’s rights would be the law. In countries like England, Singapore, India and so on, only men can be charged with rape. As in, the legal definition of rape requires the perpetrator “insert their penis…”. Women can only be charged with rape in some of these countries under “joint enterprise” when they participate in a rape by a male rapist. This means a woman can literally tie a man down and have her way, and s…
/r/MensRights10/05/24 10:34 AM
14

Whatever a man can do, a woman is capable of too. Murder, rape, torture, beastitality, necrophilia and more, plenty of horrible men and women have done these. That’s why I would choose a bear over a woman too. And at least the bear would just kill me. Plenty of female murderers falsely accuse their victims of raping or assaulting them when caught to get a lighter sentence, that’s worse. To get murdered and then everyone hates your legacy? I’d pick the bear any day.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 04:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter