~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [USA] What do you think about the Unborn Child Support Act?It's more proof that the Roe v Wade overturning had nothing to do with men's rights as some on this sub were saying at the time. Nothing to do with equaling the playing field for reproductive rights either as some here were also saying and making thread after thread about. This bill was made in celebratory response to Roe v Wade and is about continuing the pushing for the view that "life starts at conception". Charging child support as soon as a woman is pregnant is just the end conclusion of … | /r/MensRights | 27/07/22 09:54 AM |
| 1 | how can we get some sense into this world?Unfortunately there don't appear to be any major men's rights organizations in Mexico, otherwise I would have recommended bringing this issue to the attention of such a group and asking how they might be planning on addressing it. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/22 09:00 PM |
| 9 | Is there a sub for talking about mens depression?I would recommend starting a discord group for that instead. It is also easier to form group chats on discord and it's more closed off, so you can avoid people brigading like usually occurs on reddit. You can also invite specific people you know easily to that group chat. I agree that you shouldn't use r / depression. As a matter of fact, you probably shouldn't be using any subs on this site on general topics, they are all unofficially geared towards women even if they don't say that. | /r/MensRights | 26/07/22 08:51 PM |
| 2 | Peaches and creamThis is a pervasive and systematic problem illustrating how much public assistance and safety nets for men are lacking, as this story (also posted on this sub a while back) clearly shows. Btw, try not to get in the habit of thinking it's just "communists". This lack of regard for men crosses political boundaries, all sides of the political spectrum contribute to this kind of thing, because they don't prioritize men's rights. However, of groups that prioritize men's rights, you should bring thi… | /r/MensRights | 26/07/22 08:34 PM |
| 5 | Blatant lack of sympathy, parental rights, and misandry in parenting subUnofficial rules but good ones to apply when using this site: pretty much all subs that aren't explicitly pro men's rights are hostile to men's rights and not sympathetic to men and boys at all don't expect people not to bring up your post history on men's rights subs if you post on the default non men's rights subs | /r/MensRights | 26/07/22 08:23 PM |
| 2 | Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.Today is the final day to register to vote if you live in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida and want to vote against misandrist candidate Justin Waters in the August 23 primary. https://registertovoteflorida.gov/home is a quick link to register to vote for those that want to find a direct link to an online registration form More information is in this tweet | /r/MensRights | 25/07/22 10:13 AM |
| 1 | How is it that we live in a patriarchy when stats are starting to show otherwise?There is systematic discrimination against males but where exactly from the Bureau of Labor Statistics did you get the "6.66 million men unemployed" figure? And is that for all adult men or men in a certain age range? I was only able to find information by percentage https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/latest-annual-data/labor-force-participation-rates, https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS11300001 | /r/MensRights | 25/07/22 04:20 AM |
| -19 | Why is there so much hate for this sub?Zero citations or examples. Account made just a few days ago with no posts elsewhere except on a genealogy sub. Obvious troll is obvious. Nobody even pays attention to or talks about this sub much at all. You aren't going to be able to bait everyone here into acting like they are being persecuted so easily. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/22 05:03 AM |
| 3 | "A Smaller Share of College-Goers Are Male. So What?"; Discriminatory article mocks Men's issues by outright proclaiming: "SO WHAT?"And if you think that's bad, look at the employment situation that awaits a lot of males that do go to college even after they graduate. I wish men's rights organizations would be doing more to work against quotas favoring women and the kind of recruitment and hiring practices colleges and jobs practice that are geared to helping women. Every time there is such a quota (whether for an opening position at a college, a position for a scholarship, an internship, a job), it means that there is an in… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/22 06:55 AM |
| 6 | If you are belong to the right club at birth, you get special privileges in court.People need to start calling for judges that hand down shorter sentences for women to get recalled. Whenever there is a crime where a woman is sentenced to too long of a sentence, enough people object to it and insist the judge lose their position. The same thing needs to happen with judges that give more lenient sentences to women. In many areas outside of the federal level, judges and prosecutors run for elections. The judges and prosecutors that support more lenient sentences for women or hav… | /r/MensRights | 23/07/22 06:45 AM |
| 12 | Actionable ideasCalling out sexism is only the first step. To help solve men's rights issues, laws that discriminate against men and boys need to be changed and policies that incentivize discriminating against males need to be overturned. One person or a few people alone can't do that, you usually need institutional backing. Right now despite how many people you may see subscribed to this sub or that comment, the amount of people willing to petition, get involved in men's rights organizations and that have the … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/22 06:33 AM |
| 4 | As of July 2022, according to scholarships.com there are 112 scholarships for women and 21 for men.To have a chance of that changing, men's rights organizations need to get involved with this disparity, along with the disparity in other education and employment related areas for males. A few people can bring lawsuits but it is more likely to succeed when an organizations is bringing a lawsuit and trying to change institutional policies. Right now many men's rights organizations either have other priorities having to do with culture war issues (believe it or not) or have their hands tied with … | /r/MensRights | 23/07/22 06:29 AM |
| 4 | So much for "Bodily Autonomy" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Here's some bad possibilities from this: people can argue that even if men are dead (this is being done, as stated in the article, because of a large percentage of men that are dying in war in Israel) that fertility rates can be kept up. Anyone that couldn't care less whether men are dead or alive have more ammo to claim men aren't even needed alive to keep up birth rates. People can justify drawing sperm from dead soldiers to keep birth rates up and birthing more soldiers. No birth strike or … | /r/MensRights | 20/07/22 08:07 AM |
| 1 | Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.If you are concerned about voting for a different candidate because you don't want to end up splitting the vote and don't know who is leading in the polls, you can always vote for the incumbent (Kat Cammack), as incumbents usually have enough money and name recognition backing to not be spoiler candidates that siphon off votes. Remember, all the other candidates didn't say or advocate the same things that Justin Waters did. They didn't retroactively delete tweets after doubling down and blaming … | /r/MensRights | 19/07/22 11:06 PM |
| 2 | Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.It's not a truth and the fact that MRAs keep clinging to this idea to try and validate it instead of objecting to ideas like that which are motivated by dehumanizing and depersonalizing men shows why the MRM has not been able to effectively oppose discrimination against men and the rationalizations for it. | /r/MensRights | 19/07/22 07:46 PM |
| 2 | Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.It is irrelevant who popularized an idea, we use lots of medical stuff from Nazi Germany such as the electron microscope and information on the link between asbestos and lung cancer. Those inventions from Nazi Germany weren't used to justify sacrificing others. And the ideas that were popularized were not tangible inventions meant for many uses, but ideas that were only meant to actively further the interests of those people foreign policy and social wise, while not meant to have any other use. … | /r/MensRights | 18/07/22 10:51 PM |
| 2 | Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.Plus, if human population was endangered enough to require them, then women should have no issue with going back to said roles if they expect men to do so as well. That isn't happening in any situation and it should not be the goal either to get women to go back to said roles. Posing these hypotheticals and validating an idea that was mostly popularized by imperialists and western chauvinists that had a hostile view towards men doesn't help things and only helps people opposed to men's rights ta… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/22 10:27 PM |
| 2 | Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.I went back and included information about what website you can use for help in registering to vote and what documents you will need. The website is here: https://dos.myflorida.com/elections/for-voters/voter-registration/ | /r/MensRights | 18/07/22 10:15 PM |
| 6 | Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.No it isn't, it's an idea that was popularized by imperialists like Howard Bloom in "The Lucifer Principle" and PUAs like Roissy/Chateau Heartiste Their whole idea is either: they need as many men to fight for them as they can, or they want to reduce male competition in a social or sexual context. They use appeals to nature to justify these motives. They aren't speaking on things "as they are". Radical feminists have picked up this argument because they see the clear misandry in it. | /r/MensRights | 17/07/22 06:33 PM |
| 23 | Justin Waters, a candidate running for Congress in the 3rd Congressional District of Florida, has openly said that he thinks only men should be drafted because he thinks that "men are meant to be expendable". If you live in his district, vote against him in the primary and general elections.This is bullshit. You don't despise feminism or special treatment for women, you are making excuses treating treating men with cruelty because of appeal to nature fallacies that act like all women are able to give birth and that all men are stronger than women. This post is not meant for people like you that try to find ways to justify discrimination against men. And it doesn't matter what you choose, you don't have a right to drag other men down into dangerous situations. /u/sgtm7: if you bel… | /r/MensRights | 17/07/22 04:39 AM |
| 1 | is calling someone a third wave feminists hate speech?I saw the thread where that happened. Not only did you get downvotes but the OP of that thread where that happened also did. All for saying that someone he was breaking up with was someone who was way out of his league financially It's not uncommon for people on most subs on reddit to downvote you for not giving women special treatment or consideration. This site has always been like that and full of people that will attack and mock you for refusing to do so. The lesson to take away is to not po… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/22 04:45 AM |
| 2 | Why does no one care about male genital mutilation (circumcision) ?You are probably unintentionally around some very messed up people or in a place where circumcision because of religion is common or more generally, a place where circumcision is common for some reason or the other. Where circumcision is commonly done for any reason, people tend to justify it. In countries where it isn't that common, there will be a less favorable view of it (for example, Europeans don't seem to have as favorable a view of circumcision as compared to people in the US and circumc… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/22 04:35 AM |
| 8 | I am honestly sick of this argument."when men complain about women, it's because they get rejected, when women complain, its because of horrible experiences" It doesn't help that there are people that claim that not being able to attract women is to the same level or worse than all forms of male discrimination. There are people like that who exist and they get all the airtime. This notion doesn't always come out of nowhere. Those people are as much to blame as feminists for why people always jump to the idea that if a man is angry… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/22 04:28 AM |
| 5 | Guess who's in "Controversial subreddits" article on wikipediaAllowing anyone to come to this sub and argue with people here, which results in heated exchanges then used as examples of controversy, usually does that. | /r/MensRights | 14/07/22 04:06 PM |
| 3 | La. congressman proposes bill that would allow pregnant mothers to get child support paymentsIt's just an excuse. Notably this kind of legislation seems to be in response to the Roe v Wade overturning and some states pushing for a "life starts at conception" outlook. It's more proof that the overturning of Roe v Wade had nothing to do with men's rights and was not meant in any way to 'level' the playing field of reproductive rights. Child support and alimony have usually been supported by republican politicians, but they appear to be using the Roe v Wade overturning as an excuse to push… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/22 04:02 PM |
| 10 | La. congressman proposes bill that would allow pregnant mothers to get child support paymentsDETAILS OF THE BILL Provides flexibility for mothers who do not want involvement of the father by not requiring those mothers to receive child support Requires judges to consult with mothers on payment plans and gives mothers discretion as to whether or not child support payments will be awarded retroactively Mandates that all paternity tests be at the discretion of the mother and not be conducted if the test would put the child at risk | /r/MensRights | 14/07/22 05:44 AM |
| 10 | Women and children get rescued, men are meat shieldsI think it's pretty safe to say at this point that anyone that still supports what the government of Ukraine is doing with its male population (and is being encouraged to do by NATO and western governments) is willfully being misandrist. Also just a reminder: if you support men's rights/bodily autonomy for males, you are what is considered 'woke' https://archive.ph/BJ2u3 This is left-wing, woke agenda gone too far.” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said that it is “crazy” to require women to register … | /r/MensRights | 13/07/22 04:32 AM |
| 352 | Man changed name on his CV to a female name and got 870% more responses for an interview.This is why I keep stressing that men's rights organizations should make it a priority to get involved in helping set up support services for men that have fallen on hard times and are having difficulty making ends meet, as well as those organizations working against employment discrimination against men. | /r/MensRights | 12/07/22 04:40 AM |
| 5 | this instagram account postes against men rights and against male birth posts. i reported it to instagram and they said this is not against our community guidelines. so basically they dont care about men lives and men rightsThis is becoming more common even on platforms that previously acted far less partially. It happened on reddit during the rules revision in late 2020 that seemed to take effect in February 2021 (notice how subs like gendercritical and pinkpillfeminism were quickly banned, but fourthwavewomen is still up). It's happening on twitter now too. Since feminists that mod those sites are aware such material can be successfully reported and taken down in absence of intersectionalist feminist content poli… | /r/MensRights | 10/07/22 07:21 PM |
| 1 | Campaign to stop boy shaming in schoolsThe consistent trend is that men and boys that are harmed by discrimination against males often end up taking it out on each other (other males) the most in some way or the other, if they see no obvious efforts to work against such discrimination (which is where the MRM can and should play a part, and which is why the MRM should not talk about issues to bring awareness to them if they don't intend to do anything to address them), and that such discrimination going unaddressed and being allowed c… | /r/MensRights | 09/07/22 09:09 PM |
| 9 | Scott Adams, who notably said in 2011 to MRAs "get over it, pussies" in response to MRAs complaining about unfairness that men experience, has now suggested to parents of troubled boys that the only option may be to either "watch people die" or "kill your own son".No, he is not a men's rights activist: https://archive.ph/qNkqu | /r/MensRights | 08/07/22 01:35 AM |
| 28 | Scott Adams, who notably said in 2011 to MRAs "get over it, pussies" in response to MRAs complaining about unfairness that men experience, has now suggested to parents of troubled boys that the only option may be to either "watch people die" or "kill your own son"....and who was against MRAs (being one of the first prominent figures to speak out against MRAs and who wasn't a feminist) from the start, defending inequalities and injustices (specifically those that disproportionately impact boys and young men like male genital mutilation circumcision and the draft) that men and boys face: https://archive.ph/qNkqu That's the thing people here should not lose sight of and and should emphasize repeatedly. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 08:37 PM |
| 47 | Scott Adams, who notably said in 2011 to MRAs "get over it, pussies" in response to MRAs complaining about unfairness that men experience, has now suggested to parents of troubled boys that the only option may be to either "watch people die" or "kill your own son".Scott Adams isn't a male feminist and is closer to a tradcon, however he is staunchly against MRAs and believes in defending inequality and injustices that men experience, often through appeals to nature. He is the kind of person that doesn't identify as a feminist but nonethless tells MRAs things like: "life isn't fair, get over it" "women are better and more naturally suited at doing some tasks than men" "women are more important to the species than men" | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 08:33 PM |
| 53 | Scott Adams, who notably said in 2011 to MRAs "get over it, pussies" in response to MRAs complaining about unfairness that men experience, has now suggested to parents of troubled boys that the only option may be to either "watch people die" or "kill your own son".Scott Adams attack on MRAs (which he deleted but that was still saved) was addressed in 2011 on this sub: https://archive.ph/qNkqu Male feminist writer David Futrelle of smear site Manboobz (now We Hunted the Mammoth) enjoyed Scott Adams attacking MRAs, while at the same time accusing Scott Adams of...misogyny https://web.archive.org/web/20120118200445/https://www.manboobz.com/2011/03/15/scott-adams-to-mens-rights-activists-youll-never-win-an-argument-with-a-woman/ | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 07:06 PM |
| -3 | When you have a femdom fetish but need to dress it up with morality platitudes.That's their choice. Almost everyone (misandrist tradcons included) laughs at these kind of people, so I don't see the need to pile on them further. Who harms you more? Someone that has a weird hobby or someone that tries to enforce their life on you? The most these people are doing is a suggestion, they aren't suggesting laws or force to make you believe how they do. This is like when people were complaining about metrosexuals, hipsters and skinny jeans. Some people might make you embarrassed o… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 03:31 PM |
| -3 | When you have a femdom fetish but need to dress it up with morality platitudes.I'm pretty sure they don't care or they laugh it off. There was something like this going around in the 2010s too about 'praising the divine feminine'. It quickly died out. It's a very small number of people that do this, they've always been around and were probably even more common in the past (back when it was popular to consider women more virtuous overall). Deeply spiritual people usually. Married tradcons that shame men and boys for complaining and push them into roles that they know will h… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 03:22 PM |
| -27 | When you have a femdom fetish but need to dress it up with morality platitudes.Okay, why is this flaired as intactivism? And I'll be perfectly honest: what exactly are these males doing to anyone here? Are they physically hurting other males? Extorting them? Forcing them to fight? Denying them access to care? Pressuring them to get in relationships or support others using the threat of force or constant shame? No, they are just acting in a way that makes other males feel embarrassed. Nothing more. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 07:13 AM |
| 5 | Campaign to stop boy shaming in schoolsIn about 15 years, when these boys abused by feminist teachers get into positions of power we will see a big backlash They are more likely to become traditionalist or conservative out of spite (similar to a lot of people on this sub cheering on roe v wade out of spite) and very misanthropic, wanting to harm everyone they see as different than them (particularly other males). It doesn't work out the way people usually expect. As you know too, not all 'anti-feminists' are pro men's rights, and eve… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 04:15 AM |
| 1 | A class action law suit against media who promotes the idea of a Patriarchy.I can’t imagine any media promoting the idea of dark hidden forces They do regularly during war time, to make the opposing nation look as bad and inhumane as possible. In absence of such media (it doesn't come from a vacuum, it does to some extent reflect the views of many around you), people would just create such media that says the same thing. Alternative media for example is no less heavy with encouraging suspicion and hatred towards groups of men than the mainstream media. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 04:08 AM |
| 7 | Latvia to reintroduce compulsory military service (for men only) amid Ukraine warLatvia abandoned compulsory military service after joining the NATO military alliance. Pretty much a guarantee for European countries and more importantly, males in those countries ,that joining NATO won't keep you from being drafted. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 03:26 AM |
| 2 | USAID' plan against boys' underachivement : The real issue is women's oppression, beware of masculinityAny man who survived would be called cowards. nearly a hundred stokers, electricians, and engineers stayed in the engine rooms keeping the lights on and the ships electricity running so that more could be saved. but thats all hushed up because those poor souls who sacrificed their lives to saving people were all men Those that enforced this kind of cruelty knew shaming men as cowards wasn't enough, they would use force and threaten to "brain" any male that tried to escape, much like terrorists h… | /r/MensRights | 07/07/22 12:39 AM |
| 2 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy..."Incels" are the blackpillers and some of the redpillers also. "Chad" is a term that has become popular to describe what is essentially an objectively good looking, usually tall, hot guy. Misanthropist redpillers and blackpillers have been more frequent on this sub since all their other subs got banned. The demographics of this sub has also changed from the end of 2021 into early 2022, from an older disgruntled tradcon audience to more of a younger, frustrated (and leaning even more conservative… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/22 07:34 PM |
| 2 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...The confusion for me was more why anyone here would cheer on the Roe v Wade decision when the Supreme Court justices were not MRAs and that what they were doing was more out of religious reasons then anything else? Nowhere did they talk about 'leveling the playing field' for reproductive rights like some on this sub claimed the Roe v Wade decision would do. Also, even people saying that the possibility that a 50+ year precedent being overturned might lead to some negative consequences for males … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/22 06:32 PM |
| 1 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...But there is nothing "theocratic" about the ruling in Kennedy v Bremerton. Yes there is, it shows that the Supreme Court's priorities are more about promoting a specific religion in public life, that's why they ruled the way they did. Had the case been about someone that wasn't Christian praying, the current conservative justices on the Supreme Court would have been far less likely to side with such a coach. If you loathe religion and want to end it, step up to the plate and start publicly profe… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/22 06:12 PM |
| 1 | USAID' plan against boys' underachivement : The real issue is women's oppression, beware of masculinityIt was never really a change was my point. Now it's just made more clear that "women and children" really meant "women and girls" all along. Why exactly they decided to change, maybe it's because feminists realized saying "women and children" were making them seem too similar to tradcons, and they don't like when people see and point out the many similarities between them and tradcons (and vice versa for tradcons). Interestingly enough, feminists say that men's rights and tradcons are two sides … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/22 05:16 AM |
| 5 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...Yes I am and voting along party lines is a bad habit people need to stop nonetheless. If not the general public, then at least men's rights activists. They should be willing to vote across party lines if it is needed to either keep a particularly misandrist candidate out of office (like Justin Waters) or support a candidate that clearly delivers protections and support for men's rights. If men's rights activists can somehow overcome the partisan polarization, stop the tendency to tie their entir… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/22 05:09 AM |
| 2 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...Of course, I haven't forgotten and it almost goes without saying. However, just because I don't support misandry from republicans doesn't mean I overlook misandry from democrats, like from Joe Biden (who is a terrible candidate for men's rights no matter what party he would have, because of his policies). If I'm focusing on misandry from republicans, it's because the topic is about republicans and people claiming that they are going to vote straight ticket republican (which would mean them poten… | /r/MensRights | 06/07/22 05:03 AM |
| 2 | Baby who bled for hours after circumcision was sent home from ER twice, suffered brain damage: lawsuitThis is an age old debate but imo religious fundamentalists are quite simply doing what their religion tells them to do, in spite of any ulterior motives they might have. The moderates are often the ones not following their religion to the letter. So while the moderates might not be as responsible, their claims that such practices don't represent their religion are just not correct and hastily put together PR for their religion, however inconvenient it may be for them for others to say that. If … | /r/MensRights | 06/07/22 12:14 AM |
| 1 | Baby who bled for hours after circumcision was sent home from ER twice, suffered brain damage: lawsuitI haven't seen any out right hatred for religious/spiritual people on this sub since the passing atheism versus atheism+ controversy from the elevatorgate incident and decline in relevancy of The Amazing Atheist, all of which had mostly happened in the early 2010s. If anything imo, most people on reddit (this sub included) now look down on atheism (or even moreso, anti-theism) and stressing separation of church and state, ever since it came to be associated with unattractive autistic males ("nec… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 10:19 PM |
| 10 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...Yes, and the overturning by conservatives of Roe v. Wade that was passed by the Supreme Court shows that overall, conservatives in office have become more theocratic over time (their support for criminalizing prostitution between consenting adults under FOSTA/SESTA was part of this too). There was another case where the most important thing to conservatives on the SCOTUS was ensuring public prayer during football games would be allowed (Kennedy v. Bremmerton). This overturning of Roe v. Wade and… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 09:40 PM |
| 7 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...I don't know if that usually works for you elsewhere but you're wasting your time with me. You want me to think badly of someone? Show me that person behaving badly. I already showed you that they were acting antithetical to men's rights. If anyone is wasting time, it's you. Save your tough guy talk. You are the one that replied to me in the first place. I don't care if you think I am woke, trad-con or just an asshole, males competing in sports against women isn't fair at all and it shouldn't … | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 09:29 PM |
| 2 | Baby who bled for hours after circumcision was sent home from ER twice, suffered brain damage: lawsuitCircumcising boys is a key part of the Jewish and Islamic faith (although from the passages in the New Testament like Romans 2:25-29 it's negotiable and not a strict requirement in Christianity). MRAs opposing it are going to be accused of interfering with people's religious freedom, but when such freedom is violating a child, no exceptions are made in other instances, so no reason for it to be made here either. Like it or not circumcision of boys is part of many organized religions and those le… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 08:56 PM |
| 9 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...And that's not to even say democrats are even better, but at least they don't perform lip service to men while actively at every opportunity working against men's rights. I don't see democrat politicians running for office on the platform that proudly tweet things like "men are meant to be expendable, including women in the draft will destabilize the family" I don't see democrat politicians saying that fatherhood and helping out struggling men is important and then defending laws that treat ever… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 08:04 PM |
| 2 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...I rather loose in family court than loose mY life Not to mention that you can mostly avoid family court by avoiding marriage and relationships with women. If you are male, no matter what you do, you can't avoid discrimination in hiring and employment, substandard access to mental health and public assistance, and having to sign up for the draft and facing imprisonment in the event a draft is declared. Family court issues are important but they primarily affect married men or men in relationships… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 07:39 PM |
| 12 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...No, that "fatherhood rights bill" was full of meaningless fluff mean to sound good. When push came to shove, he showed where his true priorities lied. This is who he listened to: https://floridaphoenix.com/2022/03/18/first-wives-urge-desantis-to-veto-reform-that-lets-wealthy-exes-undo-alimony-pledges/ Also he has said things like this: "And I can tell you, they do not want this woke garbage in our society. They don’t want women to be denied the opportunity to participate in sports." https://www.… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 07:12 PM |
| 6 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...You're citing all the negative consequences of traditional gender roles and ignoring the positive consequences. There are no positives unless you are married and have a family. The men's rights movement isn't only about married men and it's definitely NOT about promoting traditional gender roles. Progressive-minded people generally assign a very low level of value and respect for masculinity. The dominant narrative among Leftists is that Men are bad. Leftists also generally assign very little ac… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 06:44 PM |
| 9 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...Men have to sign up for the selective service or they are: faced with fines, imprisonment, barred from employment, denied financial aid and have all their possessions confiscated, prevented from leaving the country and imprisoned if they refuse to fight when a draft is declared. Women have to do none of this and face none of the same penalties, they are treated as above the law. Including women in the draft or getting rid of the draft altogether as everything to do with men's rights. You know th… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 06:20 PM |
| 4 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...I'm saying that traditional Gender Roles are more fair for Men than what the Average Leftist believes. You're saying it's not. That's just a difference in opinion. I would rather have things be traditional than every woman becoming a girl-boss and leaving behind any and all respect for masculinity. No they aren't and this isn't merely a difference of opinion. Traditional gender roles cause so many of the problems men's rights activists complain about, from workplace deaths, to lack of funding fo… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 06:14 PM |
| 10 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...I also believe that more restrictive traditional Gender Roles are more fair for men anyway than this Leftist pseudo-equality crap. No they aren't. Anyway republicans aren't going to do away with pseudo-equality that favors women, they are all for keeping that intact. They will however stall progress on making things more equal for men. I really think this was some 4D chess move to convince enough MRAs that they care about us. I think they knew it would be shot and many MRAs would blame Repubs No… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 05:35 PM |
| 25 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...Voting for republicans to spite democrats for broken promises on equality is essentially cutting off your nose to spite your face. It does nothing to help men's rights. Republicans by and large have done everything they can to stall progress on men's rights when there is the possibility that men's rights issues would gain traction. They put it forward knowing from the jump it would be shot down. They probably did it just so they could claim to us that they care about equality. Wrong. Senate demo… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 05:14 PM |
| 2 | USAID' plan against boys' underachivement : The real issue is women's oppression, beware of masculinityFuck off with your attempts at making this about class instead of women being privileged even above children. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 05:02 PM |
| 47 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...I highly, HIGHLY doubt there was an ACTUAL, SERIOUS push to include Women in the draft. Republican politicians like Chip Roy and Josh Hawley actively tried to block attempts to include women in the draft. Republicans in the Senate filibustered the provision in the 2021 NDAA to include women in the draft until it was removed. Republicans like Donald Trump Jr., Mike Pompeo and Matt Gaetz are all for keeping it so that only men have to register for the draft. A republican candidate running in the 3… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 05:00 PM |
| 9 | If it were not for feminism the men's rights movement would not existMen's rights would still exist and there would probably be even more awareness of issues that affect men because men were still disenfranchised before feminism even emerged. Men's rights might have even gained more traction even if it emerged later because their only opponent they would have to worry about would be tradcons. If anything, feminism has been hogging the spotlight and making every issue of gender discrimination all about women, preventing any progress from being had in sufficiently … | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 04:55 PM |
| 148 | Democrats Are Freaking Out Because A "Woman's Right To Choose" Is In Jeopardy...If you vote straight ticket republican, you will end up voting for some politicians that support drafting only men, and so people that privilege women will still get your vote. Don't vote along party lines, vote depending on policy. You shouldn't rule out voting for a political party (that's within reason, no actual extremists or nazis obviously) if the candidate from that party is more favorable to men's rights issues. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 04:46 PM |
| 3 | Baby who bled for hours after circumcision was sent home from ER twice, suffered brain damage: lawsuitFreedom to practice religion only goes so far. FGM might be mandated in some religions and yet it is illegal, while MGM is. Organized religions are some of the biggest defenders of male genital mutilation circumcision Don't let the religious freedom argument fly. Male genital mutilation circumcision being allowed for religious reasons violates the separation between church and state in countries that have such separations too. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 04:19 PM |
| 2 | USAID' plan against boys' underachivement : The real issue is women's oppression, beware of masculinityAnother thing too, "masculinity" or "encouraging it/discouraging it" means nothing, it's a distraction and a convenient phrase both feminists and traditionalist conservatives like to use. Whenever there is a report talking about praising or condemning any form of 'masculinity' it means nothing, it's just feminists or traditionalist conservatives getting ready to pitch their agenda. | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 04:04 PM |
| 15 | USAID' plan against boys' underachivement : The real issue is women's oppression, beware of masculinityGlobal agencies and nation states are gradually changing all their "women and children" agendas to "women and girls". "Women and children" always meant women, children were just used as a convenient shield. More women than children survived aboard the Titanic. "Women and children" is a phrase used to advocate harm to men and boys, erase male casualties and should be seen as such. It's not a moral calling, it's advocating supremacy and privilege for women while pretending to talk about the greate… | /r/MensRights | 05/07/22 03:59 PM |
| 2 | Biden’s war on men? Title IX Changes Will eviscerate Due Process On Campuses: Robby SoaveNot not really, it's just pandering. They had to take a break from pandering to TERFs and they still throw a bone to MRAs every now and then to keep them voting for them while they do absolutely nothing substantial for men's rights. It's just words. | /r/MensRights | 28/06/22 06:37 AM |
| 1 | Oklahoma Democrat proposes mandatory vasectomies for boys until they reach "financial and emotional stability"To help with doing that, the power of the two parties in blocking third party candidates needs to be reduced. RNC and DNC handpicks nominees that stick to the establishment party platform, even for those like Bernie Sanders or Ron Paul that have no choice but to run as democrat or republican, respectively, in order to stand a chance of winning the presidency. There is also the issue of delegates and superdelegates, which can also result in the RNC and DNC chairs gaming the system to push their… | /r/MensRights | 28/06/22 06:05 AM |
| 1 | Peak stupidity. Amy Coney Barrett is a woman, and Clarence Thomas is black. Roe v. Wade being overturned cannot be the fault of "old white men."Not only that, she was the deciding vote. Even misandrist politician Josh Hawley (who btw supports the overturning of Roe v Wade and supports only drafting men), said so: https://twitter.com/HawleyMO/status/1540345816019238912 | /r/MensRights | 28/06/22 02:18 AM |
| 4 | The overturning of roe vs wade isn’t a good thing and here’s whyIf you find this sub too tradcon recently for your liking, there are other anti-feminist men's rights subs like promalecollective that aren't cheering on Roe v Wade. | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 05:26 AM |
| 3 | Woman beats her boyfriend, runs from and then assaults cops. Witnesses explain she did it, both are arrested. all charges on her dismissed.. I am just.. So done with this. I'm ready to give upThere is awareness of racial bias in policing and attempts to reduce it. There should also be awareness of gender bias against males in policing and attempts to reduce it. Police brutality against non-white men for example, won't be fully addressed until supervision and regulations overseeing police conduct acknowledge and attempt to correct for the problem of anti-male bias in policing, as well as awareness of men that may behave 'abnormally' (through having mental issues, nervousness, autism),… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 04:43 AM |
| 2 | What can we do to improve our situation to guarantee our rights as fellow human beings now?Vote against politicians that support clear male discrimination (like keeping the draft male only) and lack of funding for male issues (for example, through their votes in blocking funding for men's health). Vote for politicians that have a track record of not obstructing progress on male issues and that can at least indirectly help men through not promoting war. When a politician makes a clearly anti-male remark on social media and touts how they will support a law that will clearly disadvantag… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 04:37 AM |
| 9 | Do you think the way women choose partners is an MRM issue?No I don't, and I think focusing on it has put off a lot of men that aren't interested in dating or who are gay (but who would be interested in addressing discrimination against males under the law if not for that kind of discussion) from the MRM, as well as detracted focus from activism. Focusing on the way women choose partners was also frequent a decade ago within the MRM and it got the MRM nowhere except quotes being cherrypicked from such discussions by the SPLC to portray MRAs as being fru… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 04:21 AM |
| 1 | Florida Signs new Fatherhood Rights BillGuess who he did end up listening to: https://floridaphoenix.com/2022/03/18/first-wives-urge-desantis-to-veto-reform-that-lets-wealthy-exes-undo-alimony-pledges/ | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 03:08 AM |
| 2 | Florida Signs new Fatherhood Rights BillEdit: I know that many commenters here are aprehensive or jaded or simply careful about being overly optimistic. But I would like to point out that this is the first time that policy has been enacted that was directly and primarily developed by an MRA. That is a monumental shift. I really hope nobody here falls for this kind of lip service about 'masculinity' and 'fathers' again. Those that fear monger about transwomen in women's sports and bathrooms and fear monger about vaccines and vaccine ma… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 03:05 AM |
| 1 | Florida Signs new Fatherhood Rights BillHis claim to help fatherhood was mostly rhetoric and vague talk of encouraging fathers: https://flgov.com/2022/04/11/governor-ron-desantis-signs-groundbreaking-legislation-to-support-involved-fatherhood-in-florida/ He vetoed a bill that would have allowed more equal alimony and child custody for fathers: https://floridaphoenix.com/2022/06/24/fl-governor-vetoes-alimony-overhaul-marking-its-third-failure-in-a-decade-of-reform-efforts/#:~:text=By%3A%20Laura%20Cassels%20%2D%20June%2024%2C%202022%2… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Gov. DeSantis Veto's Alimony and Custody Reform in Florida.Conservatives in Congress keep showing they stand in the way of more co-equal parenting, alimony, and child custody for fathers, in addition to equal rights for men in general. Somehow, conservatives have managed to convince a lot of men's rights activists through lip service that they suddenly care about 'fatherhood', while they literally say in the next breath that only men should fight otherwise "fathers and sons stay home". Either that or most men's rights activists are proving opponents of … | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 01:57 AM |
| 1 | The overturned of Roe v Wade is not more democracyI agree, this ruling isn't about benefitting men's rights, making things more equal or even about protecting life, it was done as a part of a traditionalist conservative agenda, of which restricting access to abortion is part of. The hope of the justices is that abortion from the moment of conception is banned in enough states so as to effectively outlaw abortion at all stages and emphasize a motherly or nurturing natural traditional role of women that they have in mind and that they hope that w… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 12:25 AM |
| 1 | The overturned of Roe v Wade is not more democracyAt any rate I doubt the decision has anything to do with democracy or what regular people think. It's probably a political manipulation for the purposes of dividing the working class against each other to make sure of the security of the thieving 1%. It's just tradcon justices on the Supreme Court trying to advance a tradcon agenda, of which restricting abortion happens to be part of. It has nothing to do with men's rights and nobody here has any reason to cheer for this from a men's rights pe… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 12:22 AM |
| 1 | Gov. DeSantis Veto's Alimony and Custody Reform in Florida.There's still people here claiming that DeSantis was someone "who appeased the woke mob" or went "woke". No, what you have to understand is that if you are a men's rights activist and want equal treatment for males, it's you who is considered woke. You are the "woke mob" they are referring to. https://archive.ph/BJ2u3 This is left-wing, woke agenda gone too far.” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said that it is “crazy” to require women to register for the draft as “part of the Democrats’ ongoing social … | /r/MensRights | 27/06/22 12:11 AM |
| 1 | Gov. DeSantis Veto's Alimony and Custody Reform in Florida.I've supported DeSantis this whole time due to his take on COVID restrictions and lockdowns, They were just using you. Republicans have been fearmongering about COVID vaccines as a cynical way to get elected, all because democrats supported COVID vaccines. Many republicans even turned against Trump and his "operation warp speed" vaccine program because of this. Prominent misandrist politicians (incumbent and aspiring) like Chip Roy and Justin Waters have built a following around stirring up ou… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/22 11:57 PM |
| 2 | the lack of empathy this sub is showing in regards to Roe V Wade is making question whether you really want equality.Just to let you know, dissent on that sub against war (such as the current Ukraine-Russia War) is not tolerated on leftwingmaleadvocates and portrayed as "pro Putin propaganda" by the mods there https://np.reddit.com/r/ProMaleCollective/comments/vbzgqr/rleftwingmaleadvocates_mod_accuses_me_of_posting/ | /r/MensRights | 26/06/22 06:09 PM |
| 1 | the lack of empathy this sub is showing in regards to Roe V Wade is making question whether you really want equality.You know what? I agree. I'm seeing people cheer on (and more importantly) demanding you agree with their social views on abortion issues or else they paint you as a liberal feminist. They have politicized what didn't need to be political. The kind of views they are championing? They are championed by pro men in the draft politicians like Chip Roy and Josh Hawley https://twitter.com/chiproytx/status/1522299339888111616 https://twitter.com/search?q=roe%20(from%3Ahawleymo)&src=typed_query&f=livehtt… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/22 04:52 PM |
| 14 | Gov. DeSantis Veto's Alimony and Custody Reform in Florida.DeSantis wrote up this congratulatory bill about fathers: https://flgov.com/2022/04/11/governor-ron-desantis-signs-groundbreaking-legislation-to-support-involved-fatherhood-in-florida/ And now he does this? Because it's just words. Here's where his real priorities lie: addressing 'woke' culture wars issues to appease the tradcon wing of the republican party: "And I can tell you, they do not want this woke garbage in our society. They don’t want women to be denied the opportunity to participate… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/22 02:56 PM |
| 1 | REP. CHIP ROY: You Will Not Draft My DaughterBecause imo to them it's not about children. Children can't provide them with a good feeling compared to how women can. It's purely emotional. Even recently tradcon leaning people like Bill Maher have said (it was a fairly recent episode) that given the choice between a woman and a child in the abortion debate, they are going with the woman because they simply "like women" and that's what people that like women do. Essentially it just comes down to that they like women and being around women mor… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/22 01:17 PM |
| 3 | REP. CHIP ROY: You Will Not Draft My DaughterYes, that was a lower court judge in Texas, but along the way a higher court citing Rostker v. Golberg (a 1981 case that upheld male only SSS registration mainly because women weren't allowed in combat positions then unlike now) as a way of trying to stall the case against male only SSS (possibly with help of the DOJ and Biden appointed solicitor general Elizabeth Prelogar encouraging SCOTUS not to hear the case), and then Obama appointed justice Sotomayor making the decision to send the issue t… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/22 03:01 AM |
| 2 | REP. CHIP ROY: You Will Not Draft My DaughterDon't let them fool you, it's all about privileging women and disenfranchising men because these people (who aren't everyone in the world mind you) simply have no empathy for men. In Ukraine where post menopausal women are allowed to escape but youthful men aren't? In countries where there is draft registration or some form of mandatory military service where infertile men are forced to fight because of being male but infertile women aren't? Women that are more physically fit that are allowed to… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/22 02:52 AM |
| 3 | REP. CHIP ROY: You Will Not Draft My DaughterDon't forget that Chip Roy is on twitter claiming draft registration equalization is because of "woke leftists". "Woke" is a non-starter word that has come to mean anything tradcons want it to. "Woke", "SJW": people have been saying this before (although it's unpopular given the association "woke" has with anything anti men's rights), but men's rights is considered all the same 'woke' and 'SJW' to these kinds of politicians and political commenters. https://archive.is/wbe1n Men's rights activi… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/22 02:41 AM |
| 2 | REP. CHIP ROY: You Will Not Draft My DaughterThe politicians that make this decision (just like in the past) will send any male into harm's way if it comes down to it. There is recent evidence of this from politicians like Jerry Nadler saying "if a country needs people (to fight wars) it needs people". Disabled men have historically been forced to hand out supplies on the front line where they are regarded as acceptable targets because of this (remember that when feminists claim that demanding voting come with equal obligations such as sig… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/22 02:39 AM |
| 22 | REP. CHIP ROY: You Will Not Draft My DaughterChip Roy has previously said this: Roy said there are already thousands of women who volunteer to serve in the armed services and would continue to do so if the U.S. entered another war. He further pointed to the roughly 17 million men of "draft-registration age," who along with 60 million men ages 18-49 would be able to take up arms if a global campaign broke out. has falsely claimed that if both men and women are drafted, "fathers and sons stay home", has not done anything to get rid of mili… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/22 03:51 PM |
| 3 | Lawmakers brace for culture war collision as Congress hammers out annual defense policy billOr if not them, their family (sons and daughters) should be the first to be drafted and deployed into active military situations to either fight or hand out supplies on the front line for any war they declare. Gives an extra incentive for members of Congress not to declare war unless they deem it absolutely necessary. | /r/MensRights | 18/06/22 03:07 PM |
| 1 | Lawmakers brace for culture war collision as Congress hammers out annual defense policy billChip Roy is up for re-election this year. https://ballotpedia.org/Chip_Roy https://ballotpedia.org/Texas%27_21st_Congressional_District_election,_2022 Best course of action if you live in his district is to vote against the front runner candidate running against him. Also remember that you need to be registered to vote and have your application sent reach your county's voter registrar at least 30 days before the General Election on November 8, 2022 | /r/MensRights | 18/06/22 03:01 PM |
| 3 | MSNBC guest: "White Men" are the biggest threat to women’s liberty as citizens, and the right to votehttps://archive.ph/uoM7p For over the past two months, an avalanche of stories have hit Western mainstream press which purported to document instances of mass rape carried out by Russian troops against Ukrainian civilians. One particular story in Time took off, driving outrage and condemnation by Western officials and receiving repeat coverage on CNN and other major US networks. It alleged "a systemic, coordinated campaign of sexual violence" - relying chiefly on testimony gathered by Ukraine'… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/22 11:12 AM |
| 6 | MSNBC guest: "White Men" are the biggest threat to women’s liberty as citizens, and the right to voteThe fact is that it has been men who are sending men to die in war Today in countries like Ukraine where men are being sent to die in war, there are both men and women that hold office that sign off on this decision. Today, there are women voters that do not have to sign up for military conscription but can vote on whether to send other men to war. Today, women can hold office despite not having to sign up for the draft, and but can vote on wars that result in men being drafted into them. Men an… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/22 02:37 PM |
| 3 | Socialists such as Ernest Belfort Bax and Eugene V. Debs show socialism does not have to be opposed to men's rights.Yes, however that willingness to doesn't stop them from still criticizing and having an unfriendly, hostile view to men's rights. Also, the fact remains that the mods on that sub removed a thread about the anti-feminist satire sub menkampf being banned, which is behavior that mods of anti men's rights subs or subs that pay lip service to men's rights often engage in. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 11:20 PM |
| 1 | MRAs, LWMAs and strategySorry but I think we're talking past eachother here. I thought I was quite specific: who exactly is proposing that we bring these right-wingers on board? To be clear, spaces like these would not/should not endorse right-wing MRAs nor welcome them into its ranks. Right-wing guests are flaired and assumedly closely watched. This is the main reason for the existence of this sub over mensrights. I mean people that want to sympathize with whoever claims they are "disaffected men that felt forced to t… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 10:41 PM |
| 2 | Slate - How a washed-up movie star, men’s rights activists, and true-crime fans duped America.Another thread removed without explanation. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/22 08:33 PM |
| 1 | MRAs, LWMAs and strategyI'm not sure how disaffected men are recruited universally By universally I mean with no regard to what they are actually saying and what their views and just as importantly, behavior towards others, are. Like it or not, bringing such people onboard the men's rights movement will alienate existing men's rights supporters and damage cooperation, since the people being brought on board (think of the kind of people on communities . win/scored . co/4chan) have repeatedly demonstrated a history of ma… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 08:27 PM |
| 0 | MRAs, LWMAs and strategyFeminists in the media that want to tie men's rights activists to men in the right wing (not all men in the right wing mind you, but the disaffected men in the right wing that gravitated to the right wing because of worries about the culture and racial makeup of their country) that rant about how their way of life is disappearing because there's too many immigrants, lgbt, and that have engaged in acts of violence that can be conflated with their previous support for men's rights activism. https:… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 06:46 PM |
| 5 | Socialists such as Ernest Belfort Bax and Eugene V. Debs show socialism does not have to be opposed to men's rights.It's the first part about mods on stupidpol removing a clearly relevant thread about anti-feminist satire sub menkampf getting banned that is more of an issue than the second, although the second is also proof imo that they are friendly towards radical feminists. Also I have seen anyone that is assigned an "MRA" flair on stupidpol, be it "Incel/MRA" or "Libertarian MRA", gets a deragatory soyboy icon affixed at the end of the flair. The only other flairs that seem to get this trailing soyboy ico… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 01:54 PM |
| 1 | Slate - How a washed-up movie star, men’s rights activists, and true-crime fans duped America.Here is an archive link to the Slate article: https://archive.ph/cWkNO Here is a list of archived articles and details of more media outlets that attacked Johnny Depp's win and its relation to men's rights: https://archive.ph/Cp40c | /r/MensRights | 13/06/22 01:24 PM |
| 9 | Socialists such as Ernest Belfort Bax and Eugene V. Debs show socialism does not have to be opposed to men's rights.Except for when the mods of that sub removed the thread about anti-feminist sub menkampf getting banned, even though it was arguably perfectly on topic for that sub: https://archive.ph/FGU7A There are quite a bit of radical feminists on that sub too, as they associate trans inclusion and awareness as "idpol". | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 01:02 PM |
| 2 | Slate - How a washed-up movie star, men’s rights activists, and true-crime fans duped America.No, they are back up. | /r/MensRights | 13/06/22 09:38 AM |
| 1 | Socialists such as Ernest Belfort Bax and Eugene V. Debs show socialism does not have to be opposed to men's rights.On June 16, 1918, Socialist Party leader Eugene V. Debs was arrested and jailed for a speech opposing the US government’s involvement in World War I. Speaking to a large crowd in a park in Canton, Ohio, Debs called the war an imperialist war and denounced the Democratic administration of Woodrow Wilson and the capitalist governments of Europe for waging it. “Every solitary one of these aristocratic conspirators and would-be murderers claims to be an arch-patriot,” Debs declared. “Every one of th… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 09:35 AM |
| 13 | Socialists such as Ernest Belfort Bax and Eugene V. Debs show socialism does not have to be opposed to men's rights.Many working class men in England only got the right to vote when it came time to be drafted into World War 1 or after they had demonstrated "service to their country" https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/millions-working-class-men-got-vote-100-years-ago-121293 In 1910, only 60 per cent of men had the vote. The position of men as a whole was not that of full citizen by contrast to ignored women. Britain’s was an elite democracy – up until the moment, in 1918, when it took a major step to change that. Men… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 09:21 AM |
| 4 | Slate - How a washed-up movie star, men’s rights activists, and true-crime fans duped America.Archive link: https://archive.ph/cWkNO See a list of more media outlets that attacked Johnny Depp's win and its relation to men's rights here: https://promalecollective.wordpress.com/2022/06/04/boycott-list-of-media-spreading-misandrist-disinformation-on-the-depp-heard-case/ https://archive.ph/Cp40c | /r/MensRights | 13/06/22 09:20 AM |
| 1 | Socialists such as Ernest Belfort Bax and Eugene V. Debs show socialism does not have to be opposed to men's rights.On June 16, 1918, Socialist Party leader Eugene V. Debs was arrested and jailed for a speech opposing the US government’s involvement in World War I. Speaking to a large crowd in a park in Canton, Ohio, Debs called the war an imperialist war and denounced the Democratic administration of Woodrow Wilson and the capitalist governments of Europe for waging it.“Every solitary one of these aristocratic conspirators and would-be murderers claims to be an arch-patriot,” Debs declared. “Every one of the… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/06/22 09:06 AM |
| 3 | Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) hypocritically rails against Woodrow Wilson, "wars for democracy and nation building", while in 2021, he supported keeping the Selective Service System that enables and makes easier mobilization for such wars, and that was put into place by Woodrow Wilson.“I’m in favor of keeping the Selective Service,” Hawley said, “but I’m not in favor of forcing women to fight against their will.” Draft registration for manly men, on the other hand, is A-OK. “If you’re an able-bodied young man … you should be willing to take up arms and fight for this country,” Hawley told one interviewer. https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/editorials/article255545951.html, https://www.columbiamissourian.com/opinion/guest_commentaries/in-josh-hawleys-world-of-masculinity-w… | /r/MensRights | 12/06/22 03:47 PM |
| 11 | Male health inequality not helped by employersDefinitely, the victim blaming narrative that men's health problems are only because of their own decisions also falls apart after closer examination: https://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/throughout-life-heart-attacks-are-twice-as-common-in-men-than-women Experts still aren't sure why heart attacks are more common in men than in women. But differences in risk factors (such as high cholesterol) do not explain the contrast, new research suggests. Researchers found that throughout life, men … | /r/MensRights | 12/06/22 03:25 PM |
| 2 | Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.the black community is traditionally conservative socially and liberal economically. This is controversial to say but many groups of non-white men are more conservative socially than many liberals would like (including men that are Middle Eastern, East Asian and South Asian), and this drives a lot of resentment and racism from liberals against these groups of men, who feel these men are correspondingly a threat to the values they hold dear. Black men are the largest democratic voting bloc exce… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 12/06/22 07:50 AM |
| -5 | Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.But if they gave a shit, those incels might be more likely to be productive, cooperative, understanding, and part of society - perhaps even optimistic of finding a partner. I have looked at those forums too of those that identify by themselves by that label. I believe they don't want help and also they are actually and unfortunately everything the media has proclaimed that they are. If they want to move away from that situation, I believe they are only ready for engagement when they themselves d… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/06/22 02:26 AM |
| -1 | Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.Wait what? You don't want to unintentionally sympathize with people who believe bad things? Yes, I don't want to sympathize with people that end up having views I consider repugnant and counterproductive to the rights of all men. Not only does me doing this result in me mis-placing my trust in others and telling them things that they can later use for their own agenda, I don't want to engage with people that are clearly not interested in men's rights and are just as using it as a cover for their… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/06/22 01:35 AM |
| 2 | Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.if you're trying to court right-wingers back to the left, or understand why they ended up on the right in the first place, I think it's wise to be considerate and contemplative of the issues they might be interested in and the idea that some are fickle and likely to be influenced by the group they end up in. I have tried to understand those issues and where they are coming from, but everything I have seen from looking at how people in those communities interact suggest that what is reported in t… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/22 10:21 PM |
| -3 | Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.Have you seen the communities they are in and what they say as well as what they are primarily motivated about? I have. It's not men's rights. It's not usually even the economy. I tried to be clear in this post that by right wing men I don't mean just any general right wing men, but the ones that claim that they were "disaffected" and were pushed to the right wing and more specifically, politicians like Trump. I would be very careful in trying to figure out why any one particular person might or… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/22 09:52 PM |
| -3 | Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.This poll is of people in the US, where politics has arguably become far more polarized and steeped in fixation about cultural identity and race than in places like the UK. I do not think that a man becoming right wing is always because of racial inclinations or anxieties, but I do think it's a possibility among many such men that fit that ideological description. Feminists in the media have been saying this, but from the data like this poll, I don't think they are always necessarily incorrect… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/22 09:29 PM |
| 3 | Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.The gist of what I'm saying is this: many "disaffected young men" that claim to have drifted to the right wing (regardless of race) and who have said they were pushed to politicians like Trump, can often by motivated by undercover racial and xenophobic inclinations, not necessarily what they are claiming about how they feel put upon because they are men. Sort the poll specifications by GRT - Jewish People > By Race (4 category) > Trump - Voters or Trump - Voters 2020 and compare to other v… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/22 08:56 PM |
| 2 | Be careful about aiming activism too much at disaffected young men that become rightwing. A poll about Great Replacement Theory shows the idea that a sense of alienation (even among men of color) contributing to men moving to the right wing can instead be more explained by xenophobia and racism.In particular, Sort by GRT - Jewish People > By Race (4 category) > Trump - Voters or Trump - Voters 2020 It's been an emerging theme in the MRM to show sympathy to disaffected young men that drift to the right, many of whom are said to have turned to figures like Trump or become more favorable towards right wing ideas. However, the reasons they do so should be examined closely to avoid unintentionally sympathizing with those that really are more concerned about racial and cultural homogeneity… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/22 06:42 PM |
| 31 | Apex fallacy and the cringeworthy irrationality of RationalWiki.orgYes, it's a shame that they have articles like that and in their section debunking MRAs they actually claim that male only military drafts just make sense because of biology https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Men%27s\_rights\_movement#Claims\_and\_rebuttals War, male-only militaries, and male-only drafts Claim: Most countries only require men to participate in the draft or national services. This means life is has higher chance to be put at risk in those countries, simply by being born male and possi… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/06/22 06:34 PM |
| 1 | The Only One Setting Back Abuse Survivors Is Amber Heard (And The Media That Propped Her Up)Yes https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/03/21/womens-magazine-calls-on-society-to-normalize-slapping-men-in-the-face-for-crossing-the-line-1047798/ Furthermore they never apologized and stood by what they said: Because Twitter is an annoying place of “but what about” people who refuse to acknowledge the obvious context, crossing the line can be when a man tries to pull you in after you say you’re not interested, or disrespects you with some disgustingly sexual and degrading comment.— Evie Maga… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 05:34 AM |
| 2 | The Only One Setting Back Abuse Survivors Is Amber Heard (And The Media That Propped Her Up)The same eviemagazine that said "Normalize slapping men in the face when they’ve crossed the line."? https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/03/21/womens-magazine-calls-on-society-to-normalize-slapping-men-in-the-face-for-crossing-the-line-1047798/ Did they apologize or take back this statement when confronted about it? No, they stood by it. It's considered the in thing to hate Amber Heard and side with Johnny Depp (not that such a decision is wrong, but it's likely being done for the wrong reasons). | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 05:34 AM |
| 4 | Join Our Campaign — #UberHatesMen — Fight Uber’s Discrimination Against MenI'm not going to bother with your idiocy when you raise such fallacies at the outset. Goodbye and enjoy your own nonsense. Please don't use the site or the MRM Boycott Lists, just let those who put effort in get on with it without your idiocy. Nice cop-out, you have repeatedly dodged questions and claimed people should just trust you at your word, even though you refuse to provide citations of why certain brands are on the boycott list and insist on tying men's rights to politically tangential s… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/22 03:54 AM |
| 1 | Vicky Hartzler, who was against expanding the selective service to women, is running for the Senate seat in Missouri and has received an endorsement from tradcon Josh HawleyImportant information regarding Vicky Hartzler's 2022 Senate Campaign (she's up for re-election this year https://ballotpedia.org/Vicky_Hartzler: Missouri Senate Election Primary is August 2, 2022, General is November 8, 2022. Times polling centers are open: 6 am to 7 pm central Deadline to register to vote appears to be at latest, the 4th Wednesday before the primary election on August 2, 2022 https://sos.mo.gov/elections/goVoteMissouri/registerhttps://ballotpedia.org/United_States_Senate_ele… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/22 10:23 PM |
| 3 | Join Our Campaign — #UberHatesMen — Fight Uber’s Discrimination Against MenThe MRM boycott lists are strictly limited to those brands associated directly with the oppression of men (or boys). If that was true that's the only thing your website would consist of. It doesn't at the moment, on the website that the boycott list is on, it also consists of news articles that talk about marxism, abortion and covid, all divisive topics that will alienate a lot of men's rights activists because of how controversial these topics are to people in general. If you want an echo cha… | /r/MensRights | 08/06/22 05:29 AM |
| 5 | Join Our Campaign — #UberHatesMen — Fight Uber’s Discrimination Against MenIs that your website? If so I have some constructive criticisms: The "Recent articles on Human Rights And Wrongs" is heavily focused on what have become heavily partisan cultural issues like abortion and vaccines. If you want more traction with MRM groups, please focus on just listing the companies that you believe the MRM should boycott and individually listing the reasons why. The concept of "surplus men" as mentioned on the site under the "Recent articles on Human Rights And Wrongs" section… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/22 11:07 PM |
| 12 | Ukraine againHello again, I want to let you know that guys like you haven't been forgotten and the drafting of men that has taken place has not been ignored, and has only served to reinvigorate men's rights activism everywhere https://np.reddit.com/r/ProMaleCollective/comments/us8jfq/do_not_forget_the_males_currently_being/ https://np.reddit.com/r/ProMaleMemes/comments/uxmx4g/but_no_one_cares_about_men_or_enough_to_show/ At the very least too, your stories have helped more people realize the human cost of ma… | /r/MensRights | 06/06/22 12:58 PM |
| 10 | A good way to reduce harm to men's lives both at home and abroad and make war and proxy wars waged less common and less longer in duration that a left wing men's rights platform could push for: advocating for restrictions on Congress owning defense and military contractsI came across this graphic and it reminded me that not only is lobbying from war industry an incentive for Congress to be more war driven, but so is their ability to invest in and hedge their bets with defense and military contracts. A recent example of this was Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) publicly downplaying concerns prior to the start of the Ukraine-Russia war and criticizing wars, but then privately hedging her bets and investing in defense contracts anyway, a day before the war sta… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/05/22 05:38 AM |
| 3 | Don’t forget to give Uber a one star rating in the App Store/Google Playhttps://archive.ph/4yQYn https://www.uber.com/en-AU/blog/women-rider-preference/ https://www.uber.com/en-AU/newsroom/womenriderpreference/ https://business.gov.au/people/customers/refuse-service#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20Australian%20Human,gender%20identity%20and%20intersex%20status archive.ph/P5fBb | /r/MensRights | 21/05/22 06:42 AM |
| 1 | Female Uber drivers allowed to reject male passengersThat just means that men in Australia need to push even harder against this kind of discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 19/05/22 08:59 PM |
| 3 | Just saw this , at a time when the women's suffrage movement was in full swing,If those men didn't do those jobs, they would also have been shamed as endangering the lives of "women and children" through their 'neglect'. For every man that undertakes a dangerous or deadly occupation, there is encouragement from the rest of society, it's not entirely contained within men themselves, there is public pressure (from both men and women) for men to do that work, as well as propaganda that encourages them to put themselves into that line of work. If men don't yield to that pressu… | /r/MensRights | 18/05/22 09:54 PM |
| 7 | Just saw this , at a time when the women's suffrage movement was in full swing,1st wave feminist in the late 19th/early 20th century: "Whose fault is that? The men chose to do those dangerous jobs." feminist today: "Whose fault is that? The men chose to do those dangerous jobs." They use that same argument for men that are drafted too. Their retort is simply"men start all the wars", "men are the one that decide to fight wars" Nothing has really changed in the way feminists view this topic. | /r/MensRights | 18/05/22 06:56 AM |
| 1 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.I don't believe that necessarily. I just believe they are online crybullies that want to feel righteous about their bullying, like Futrelle, ShitRedditSays, tumblr radfems: all of this started around 2010/2011. Whether they were later funded or used to shut down, mis-direct and stall discussion and real progress on class issues is entirely possible, but I think these interesectionalist crybully feminist types that make a mockery out of true equality are an organic phenomenon enabled by social me… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/05/22 05:09 PM |
| 3 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.I agree women should be calling out the gendered excesses pushed by feminists. However, from the policies Uber is putting forth, none of them seem to in any way disadvantage women. They only advantage women, and so feminists are all for these policies and I don't even see any tradcons complaining either. The reason I said men need to bring lawsuits is because it is male passengers being discriminated against here. It would be great if women could bring lawsuits against Uber for discriminatory po… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/05/22 08:05 PM |
| 3 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.Yes it shows how the UN has undergone regulatory capture by feminist special interests and have neglected their original mission of equal application of human rights, but they are a government body that can hypothetically have funding restricted to them and be abolished. With private companies like Uber, it's arguably just as bad if not worse, because there is no one to vote out, no way to abolish such companies that are engaging in such practices if there is already a corporate precedent (whi… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/05/22 05:31 PM |
| 3 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.While any lawsuits against Uber for this policy would be welcome, I'm not exactly sure that women will be calling out such policies when it benefits them and when they only stand to gain from the possibility of having more female drivers and passengers from this policy. It's not like family court where women sometimes lose out too and are negatively effected. There is nothing in this policy that denies them the right to do anything or is a setback to them, they can approve or disapprove of givin… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/05/22 05:26 PM |
| 4 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.While feminists come from a diverse range of ideological backgrounds (ranging from far left to far right to centrist), the ones in western countries keep defaulting to neoliberal arguments when defending discrimination against men, without fail, even the feminists that claim to be leftists. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/05/22 05:22 PM |
| 6 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.This kind of thing doesn't work. You will be accused of downplaying the struggles of marginalized groups. Does men identifying as women get them out of mandatory military "service"? It doesn't. They know the loopholes, they won't even allow you to tune things to your favor. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 07:46 PM |
| 2 | TIL about this statement by early feminist Sylvia Pankhurst on the sinking of the Titanichttps://www.scotsman.com/news/unsinkable-vote-how-titanic-impacted-suffragette-movement-2511073 | /r/MensRights | 15/05/22 07:43 PM |
| 10 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.It's almost like certain places would prefer to inconvenience themselves to make a political point than to actually help the people they claim to be helping That's exactly what needs to be stressed here. This has nothing to do with "women's safety", it is marginalizing and humiliating their male customers in hopes of increasing their marketshare with customers who aren't male. There is nothing altruistic or well intentioned about what they are doing, and they are acting like they are not running… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 09:04 AM |
| 4 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.If you want to fight for your right to make women drive you around It's not about that. It's about opposing an instance where men are denied service. It's not because it's women refusing to give rides to men, it's that drivers are allowed to discriminate against men on whim, justified by seemingly altruistic appeals to "women's safety". It's marginalization and humiliation of men designed to increase their marketshare with other customers dressed up as a social good, and that is repugnant and … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 09:01 AM |
| 9 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.Men are already denied access to assistance to food, housing, and safety. It's already happened; there's no potentiality about it Protections are for 'Women and families', with families being women with kids. (Depending on your location, I guess, maybe men still qualify somewhere.) And yet there's still claims that there isn't any male oppression, from the same people that claim to be solving oppression of women by oppressing men. They have a good grift going, the oppressors pretending to be the… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 06:48 AM |
| 41 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.A segregationist world isn't an equal one. There have already been instances showing this with apartheid rule in South Africa and the Jim Crow era in the United States. "Separate but equal" is a fiction. One group is always treated better than the other. In this situation, the group being treated better is women, at men's expense. Just like with disappearing privacy, online censorship and intelligence gathering, corrupt resource and services distribution and infringement on civil rights will be … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 06:25 AM |
| 20 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.The problem comes when this isn't restricted to ride sharing, but food and housing. Such a world leaves men to fend for themselves and be completely left without any assistance or safety net, now that the safety net was privatized and the companies these tasks were outsourced to have instated policies that put men last. "Go woke go broke" doesn't work. There was expected to be a surge in demand for products for single men as marriage rates declined and less men were getting married. It never hap… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 06:20 AM |
| 34 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.This is also applicable to efforts to constrain corporate power for a few reasons: Leaving this issue to the free market is not guaranteed to work. There is the chance that this policy will be successful and mimicked by other ride sharing companies like Lyft and Bolt. That leaves men disenfranchised and out of options when trying to find any ride sharing apps. This doesn't stop at ride sharing. The AA UK, a commercial road service company, has already announced it will be discriminating against … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 04:09 AM |
| 14 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.Yes, the LadBible article on it seems to explain things well without any media hype or speculation: https://archive.ph/Vic04 | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 03:04 AM |
| 61 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when Uber's policies allowing female drivers to refuse giving male passengers rides potentially runs afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.Another article about this, this time from LadBible: https://archive.ph/Vic04 A new policy in Australia will allow female drivers to reject giving rides to male passengers because of them being male and under the excuse of "safety" and increasing the amount of women passengers. Apply this to any situation where discrimination on the basis of intrinsic characteristics is involved. A business decides to limit service on whim to black customers using the excuse of wanting "safety for white customer… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 03:02 AM |
| 1 | "It's a private company, they can do what they want". How is that going to unfold in Australia when policies potentially run afoul of refuse service laws? Corporate whims and tribunals are no friend of men's rights.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10803855/Female-Uber-drivers-allowed-reject-male-passengers.html A new policy in Australia will allow female drivers to reject giving rides to male passengers because of them being male and under the excuse of "safety" and increasing the amount of women passengers. Apply this to any situation where discrimination on the basis of intrinsic characteristics is involved A business decides to limit service on whim to black customers using the excuse of wanting… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 02:56 AM |
| 1 | Isn't it frustrating that people who are more likely to acknowledge issues that men face (including double standards) are anti-SJW/conservative types?DeSantis has already shown signs of being a standard culture wars conservative. https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2022/04/22/desantis-bill-to-end-disney-autonomy-a-rejection-of-woke-garbage-in-our-society/ "And I can tell you, they do not want this woke garbage in our society. They don’t want women to be denied the opportunity to participate in sports." While not absolute, there seems to be a correlation between culture wars conservatives that complain about transgender women in women's sports a… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 02:42 AM |
| 1 | Isn't it frustrating that people who are more likely to acknowledge issues that men face (including double standards) are anti-SJW/conservative types?It's dangerous if such rhetoric is used by politicians to pay lip service to men's rights while pursuing a standard war hawk agenda. That's exactly what the newly elected South Korean president appears to be doing https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2022/05/13/eicj-m13.html There are also no signs that the president will even make do on his promises about treating false accusations made against men by women more seriously, let alone making conscription gender neutral to address the grievances men… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/05/22 02:38 AM |
| 7 | Double Standards for reporting on RedditScreenshot, archive and post about it on twitter, using hashtags like #reddit #misandry #hate #bias #hypocrisy. Even if reddit admins ignore your reports, you can still draw attention to this on other social media sites to make it clear beyond a doubt that reddit is biased against men and isn't as neutral as they claim. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/22 11:44 PM |
| 3 | Female Uber drivers allowed to reject male passengersUber is breaking refusal of service laws in Australia with this discriminatory policy and lawsuits can be brought against them. https://business.gov.au/people/customers/refuse-service#:~:text=According%20to%20the%20Australian%20Human,gender%20identity%20and%20intersex%20status Uber cannot refuse service to people due to race, sexual orientation, disability, AND sexual identity. Allowing female drivers to refuse male drivers on basis of biological sex constitutes discrimination and violation of t… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/22 08:23 PM |
| 5 | British Soap to air hard hitting storyline about the Men's Rights communityYour transparent attempt at shilling hasn't gone un-noticed. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/22 12:07 AM |
| 6 | Isn't it frustrating that people who are more likely to acknowledge issues that men face (including double standards) are anti-SJW/conservative types?They don't actually care, they are just using you. If you buy into what they say and share it with others, you are well on the path to being the useful idiot that they will use to push traditionalism and religious extremism and get you to vote for either far right or far left authoritarian parties. Sadly reports of captivation by the manosphere (not MRAs mind you, but the other groups) with traditionalism, racial nationalism and extremist religious sects are quite accurate. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/05/22 10:20 PM |
| 2 | Bodily Automony: Women should have the Right to Choose, Men should be free of the draft.Your post is a list of excuse making. You think removing draft laws is "pointless and a wet pipe dream" because you don't actually care about men's rights and aren't honest enough to admit that. And the person I responded to literally has said that they are an 'incel' on AskFeminists, and incels are known to have misandrist views that are the same as radical feminists, especially in how they trash men and love to argue that men are less "biologically" valuable than women. Your last remark just s… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/22 06:51 PM |
| 5 | Bodily Automony: Women should have the Right to Choose, Men should be free of the draft.Men being drafted is an issue of men being denied bodily autonomy, that's how men being drafted is related to bodily autonomy. Your last mocking sentence of "MOOOOOMMMMM! It’s not fair!” shows that you don't care about men's rights. Edit: hey /u/TrilIias, if you really think that male drafting has nothing to do with men's rights, stop pretending like you support men's rights, you pathetic fraud. | /r/MensRights | 05/05/22 06:37 PM |
| 0 | Bodily Automony: Women should have the Right to Choose, Men should be free of the draft.Correction: you wish men will never be "free of the draft" A look at your post history shows you admit to being a self-proclaimed 'incel', find it ridiculous that voting rights should be tied to conscription and propagandize the same eugenicist crap that radical feminists do. Edit: downvotes are proving my point. Nobody on this sub gives a shit about men's rights. People on this sub are ironically just as bad as other enemies of men's rights, seeing how much they seem to be wishing men were 'dis… | /r/MensRights | 05/05/22 06:34 PM |
| 1 | Roe v Wadeoptimistically, this could give 50 different chances for men's advocates to make themselves known as egalitarians when it comes to abortion law Look what that results in though from the reaction to this on subs like r/mensrights. People claim things like this is a "win" for men's rights even though it was instituted by the same SCOTUS judges that would probably rule against gender neutral conscription, rule in favor of harsher criminal sentencing for men (arguing that women are more important be… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/05/22 02:27 PM |
| 1 | Roe v Wade likely overturnedAnother reason why it's stupid for people here to celebrate this decision, specifically when it was conservative judges that made this decision for a fundamentalist agenda and these same conservative judges would dismiss any case against the male draft. Everyone here knows by now how such judges view men's rights, yet they are acting like this is a win for men's rights, thereby making it look like MRAs uniformly supported this decision (when they didn't) and that MRAs were pushing for such a dec… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 12:28 PM |
| 8 | Roe v Wade likely overturnedAbortion isn't a men's rights issue Not to mention that judges that made this decision aren't MRAs and didn't do this out of any agenda for men's rights. It's important to know and speak about that. There will be political hijackers coming to this sub trying to gloat and in the process make it easy for the MRM to look like it played a key role or strongly supported this decision (both of which are false of course). | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 05:14 AM |
| 1 | Roe v Wade likely overturnedYes you can. Nothing saying you can't. Being in the middle on this issue is good, since it isn't MRAs or MRA friendly judges that made this decision. People here are panicking about feminists blaming MRAs, not realizing that if they make this decision all about talking about financial abortion and double standards in reproductive rights, that's exactly what will happen. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 05:11 AM |
| 1 | Roe v Wade likely overturnedIf MRAs make this about financial abortion and getting in a word about double standards, then yes, the outrage is coming for MRAs too. But MRAs can avoid that and allow for the people that overruled Roe V Wade take blame. It's not like those people that overruled Roe V Wade support men's rights either. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 04:59 AM |
| 1 | Roe v Wade likely overturnedIf MRAs try to make this a conversation about financial abortion, that's exactly what will happen. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 04:54 AM |
| 1 | Roe v Wade likely overturnedI'm not going to jump up and down for or against this because it's a thorny issue to say the least That's why MRAs should be careful about this issue, specifically as using it as leverage to talk about financial abortion. Right now liberal feminist ire is currently mostly turned on the conservative judges and openly pro life men. Do you want them to go after men's rights activists too? MRAs using this issue as a chance to talk about financial abortion will do just that. it has plenty to do with … | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 04:44 AM |
| 1 | Roe v Wade likely overturnedIt's best for MRAs to stay out of this debate, the judges that handed down this decision are not MRAs and they don't have anything to do with men's rights or support it. Feminists will be looking to see if MRAs are supporting this. It's best for MRAs to remain neutral about this. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 04:30 AM |
| 1 | Roe v Wade likely overturnedBe prepared to be told why we as men should be standing up outraged and in support of women's reproductive Rights. Nobody is saying that to MRAs. Men in general maybe but not MRAs. Let me suggest that this is an opportunity for men's rights advocates to raise the possibility of fighting for reproductive Rights for all people not just women. "MRAs are trying to make the abortion ban all about themselves" There's a mixed view on abortion among men's rights activists so some will oppose this, some … | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 02:28 AM |
| 4 | Blind man abused by woman at the gym - manager backs her!Good video. Men need to stop laughing things off and pretending like discrimination against them because they are male isn't a big deal or something to joke about. If they themselves don't take it that seriously and themselves brush off or minimize the idea that they are targeted for being male, nobody aside from people that see and are outraged by male discrimination will even take what happens to them seriously, or even if they do, they won't see it as an incident of male discrimination. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/22 02:23 AM |
| 3 | The leader of the government's new disinformation board is a published feminist author who linked MRAs with incels ands Neo-Nazis. She also bragged about hurting a boy in school.Edit: this place has become completely full of people pushing mgtow and defeatism but pretending they are not. mgtow and the redpill are what killed men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/22 10:55 PM |
| -2 | The leader of the government's new disinformation board is a published feminist author who linked MRAs with incels ands Neo-Nazis. She also bragged about hurting a boy in school.Are you a mgtow, because you are sounding a lot like one right now. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/22 09:43 PM |
| 1 | Staring can land you in prison as police crackdown on 'unhealthy sexual behaviour'Even if you are joking, that loophole to plead innocence has already been tied shut. You would simply be accused of pretending to be a woman in order to get away with harassing women. To add to that, there is a lot of moral panic about transwomen and accusations of transwomen (or even men that declare they are confused about their gender identity) preying on biological women in the UK (much like there is starting to be among the right wing in the US). It wouldn't work. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/22 07:52 AM |
| 1 | Staring can land you in prison as police crackdown on 'unhealthy sexual behaviour'This law is clearly gendered In a statement released at the start of the anti-harassment campaign, TfL said: "Sexual harassment is a form of violence, most often directed against women and girls in public places. "The safety of women and girls is an absolute priority for TfL and this new campaign is one element of TfL's work to ensure everyone can travel with confidence. "The campaign aims to challenge the normalisation and dismissal of this behaviour as "something that happens" to women and gir… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/22 10:14 PM |
| 1 | Should men be worrying about sex discrimination?Even the wording of the hyperlink seems like a meme "men losing ground porn wages politics" Be afraid. Be ashamed. It's your fault. Media articles will continuously remind you, how they can they think of rubbing it in even more and talking about the false lead that is "masculinity" oh they are sure. You are losing ground even though you never reigned over others in the first place. You're scared of losing your 'privilege' even though you never had any. Cox said he plans to write more about chall… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/22 08:25 PM |
| 7 | Staring on public transport: His eyes were glued on meIn recent weeks the staring posters have been put into the spotlight after a man was jailed for staring at a woman on a train between Reading and Newbury, and blocking her exit.He was found guilty of causing intentional harassment, alarm or distress - and was sentenced to 22 weeks in prison. "and blocking her exit."! "and blocking her exit."! is all you are going to hear directed towards people that ask if the punishment is too excessive. But someone having a bad day, acting a bit weird or genui… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/22 06:52 PM |
| 2 | why our rights are taken when it comes to our children?I second the $$ comment. Consider for example how courts have sanctioned continued paternity fraud even when a man has proven he’s not the father. He’s ordered to keep paying for a child that’s not his because the state would rather he pay than the state have to provide support. It's simply easier for everyone involved to just assume the father on the birth certificate or in the relationship with a woman is the biological father. Saves time, controversy of hurt feelings from women feeling they a… | /r/MensRights | 30/04/22 06:14 AM |
| 5 | female dating strategies is gone.Okay well here is the thing: the femaledatingstrategy sub is still up but private. That means they can still come back at any time or repurpose the sub for just as much other radical feminist ends. A similar thing happened when the IncelTears sub was privated, allowing that sub to return as IncelTear and not be at risk of violating ban evasion rules. But while the femaledatingstrategy sub is now private, the 'satire' sub FemaleDatingStratPros got banned. After the userbase on the_donald largely … | /r/MensRights | 29/04/22 04:15 PM |
| 2 | Female Dating Strategy is gone!As long as they go private, they can easily return. Only their sub being banned would prevent them from returning. Remember that IncelTears went private, only to be started up again as IncelTear. Also remember when the_donald userbase left and reddit admins banned them anyway? The same should happen with fds. | /r/MensRights | 28/04/22 03:48 PM |
| 7 | The Depp-Heard Trial Reminds Us That Toxic Femininity Is RealYes, multiple such instances of it too, going back all the way to 2016 when the idea of the draft being made gender neutral was even floated https://thefederalist.com/2016/02/11/conscripting-women-into-the-military-displays-the-wests-death-wish/ https://thefederalist.com/2019/02/25/court-decision-saying-women-must-drafted-puts-equality-principle/ https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/09/the-few-republicans-who-stopped-congress-from-drafting-the-nations-wives-sisters-and-daughters-deserve-our-praise/… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 07:15 PM |
| 1 | #fuckthematriarchy?With teachers and the entire education system pushing the female oriented programs where test scores are downplayed over classroom behavior, private schools are better for boys. Depending on who you ask. There is the potential for "just go to a private school or get homeschooled" to be a cop-out reason for allowing public schools and universities to function as they do now. Aside from more conservative and religious people, public schools and universities are the main options for most. You can g… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 04:36 PM |
| 3 | We can be betterThere would still be a sub, full of people that would take issue with every aspect of the MRM does and that despite stagnation and paralyzation of any actual activism or discussion as a result, would still lecture others about "being the better person". No shortage of those people on reddit. They would fill the void. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 04:30 PM |
| 11 | The Depp-Heard Trial Reminds Us That Toxic Femininity Is RealSo The Federalist wants to pretend it cares about men now? Their two-facedness should not be forgotten: https://archive.fo/T7MRB https://archive.ph/bjBo6 https://archive.ph/RZgTH https://archive.ph/npxNL No different than feminists occasionally throwing a bone and saying "maybe we should care more about men" now and then. | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 04:24 PM |
| 2 | Issue Number One: Male Infant CircumcisionIMO all issues facing men stem from how men are treated as sacrificial and have little bodily autonomy, through both male drafting/conscription and circumcision and even through lesser known but still consequential issues such as unofficially being less likely to get public assistance in times of need and lack of funding for men's health at the local, state and national level. If the men's rights movement can't fix even those issues, the rest will essentially be window dressing and lip service a… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 01:27 AM |
| 5 | #fuckthematriarchy?Yes, unfortunately previously it was mostly tradcons on the conservative side that pushed for this. Now it's intersectionalist feminists that are present on the liberal and even far left side pushing this too. Equality will be hard to achieve when women's empowerment is being pushed at all costs by the government and even many companies even as men start to perform more poorly than women overall. What's the solution of course? More women's empowerment (assuming you leave the solution up to non m… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 01:26 AM |
| 15 | Enrollment plummets at Washington’s colleges, especially among menHow many of those men not applying were diagnosed neurodivergent, had stronger doubts about the ability to a land a job after getting a college education than their peers and had social skills or personality issues (which contrary to popular belief, are not so easy to fix) I wonder? Clearly the enrollment and underemployment issue among men will be the next issue to get a lot of coverage highlighting how women are outperforming men, specifically in western countries where unlike other places, pe… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 01:18 AM |
| 1 | The support online for Depp is of a pretty scary sortThe vast majority of supportive comments online are by women, elegies to what a saintly, pure, person this guy that they never met is. Well, Heard is likely deceptive and abusive, and Depp is very likely indeed the victim here. But, the detailed psychological speculation, enthusiasm and confidence in his tender holiness and her satanic reign, in no way match the way anyone reacts to other DV cases, especially when the victim is male. It doesn’t match this probably perfectly ok man of probably av… | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 01:12 AM |
| 23 | #fuckthematriarchy?You will be told (in mainstream left politics) that accepting that is part of the process of creating a more equitable and just world and if you oppose it it's reactionary. In mainstream right politics, they'll just meme about it and say that people need to pull themselves up their bootstraps. And articles will be run in the media pretending to be concerned about men falling behind (particularly young men starting off with very little in finances), just to rub it in more. It would be great if … | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 12:40 AM |
| 67 | #fuckthematriarchy?Don't count on any mainstream economic movement or ideology (like antiwork or lying flat) to help in this. The men's rights movement should imo be trying to work towards making it easier for men that are down on their luck and disadvantaged employment wise. From stories like the one below, it is for certain that single and divorced men particularly are discriminated against when it comes to seeking public assistance. Do not expect any non men's rights movement to address this any time soon. The … | /r/MensRights | 27/04/22 12:39 AM |
| 3 | We can be betterIt's not 'our' sub at all, it's the mods' sub. And they are more than willing to have everyone here tolerate such people if it means this sub can be seen as "better than the opposition". https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u8vgrf/our_sub_is_being_infiltrated_by_feminists_with/ https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u859a4/my_post_on_how_to_spot_feminist_lurkers_in_this/ https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u6mq8e/simple_tips_to_make_spotting_femtroll_lurkers/ | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 10:06 PM |
| 4 | Issue Number One: Male Infant CircumcisionA tie between male conscription/drafting and male circumcision imo. In fact the two are often related: https://np.reddit.com/r/SaveboysFromKnifeRape/comments/tju2cq/more_ties_between_male_genital_mutilation_and/ | /r/MensRights | 26/04/22 11:19 AM |
| 5 | Incels aren't to be laughed at – they're only going to get more dangerousExcept for talk at the end about how 'misogyny' should be made a hate crime, it doesn't take the view that women are lovely and men are problematic. It takes the view that men that participate in officially recognized 'incel' spaces and forums (not those on reddit, but actual such forums that are advertised as and openly geared towards 'incels') are problematic. Nowhere in this article does it suggest that MRA forums are equivalent to or related to 'incel' spaces. If it did, it would make mentio… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/22 10:05 PM |
| 2 | Incels aren't to be laughed at – they're only going to get more dangerousThere's absolutely no mention about men's rights or MRAs in the article itself. The only insinuation that anti-feminist groups are related is this Recent findings by UK teaching union NASUWT revealed that 72% of members had been the victim of misogyny at their school. Some teachers claimed that male pupils believed feminism was a ‘desire to kill men’, calling teachers ‘feminazis’ in the process. One female teacher recalled that a male student ‘looked me dead in the eyes and asked if I’d ever b… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/22 09:19 PM |
| 1 | Our sub is being infiltrated by feminists with some of them creating posts WELCOMING feminists into our Men's Rights Sub-Even older feminists admit modern feminism is "toxic" & "man hating"-so WHY are a few individuals trying to invite MORE here...?People claiming men "must be better" than our critics in order to get fair or just human treatment That has been the situation forever on this sub. It isn't new. Ask anyone that has been on this sub since the early 2010s and that doesn't like it any more than you do. That's just how this sub is. Outside of the mods changing their opinion on how this sub should be run, there is not much room for changing things on this sub. However there are now alternative men's rights subs that don't tolerate t… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/22 05:17 PM |
| 2 | Our sub is being infiltrated by feminists with some of them creating posts WELCOMING feminists into our Men's Rights Sub-Even older feminists admit modern feminism is "toxic" & "man hating"-so WHY are a few individuals trying to invite MORE here...?As I've said repeatedly, it isn't "our" sub. It's the sub of the mods here and they ultimately decide what direction it goes and what kind of users they allow in versus what users they don't. From the start, this sub has been more about lecturing MRAs to take the higher ground and "be the bigger man". Most of the posters here have also been happy to go along with this, as the comments on this thread show. This isn't infiltration, this is just what the sub is really about. Luckily r/mensrights do… | /r/MensRights | 23/04/22 05:12 PM |
| 5 | My post on how to spot feminist lurkers in this sub got taken down-yet someone who posted against it, now has a thread on "How to welcome feminists INTO our MRA sub"....!!It's not "our" sub. This sub has always consistently leaned on the side of lecturing MRAs about "being the bigger man" and "not being like the opposition". I do not know why there is suddenly more of an effort to target negative attention to this sub recently though. My guess is that feminists from subs like nothowgirlswork and justneckbeardthings are capitalizing on how there's been a lot more incel-themed posts recently, including articles defending and getting worried about possible efforts i… | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 10:12 PM |
| 1 | My post on how to spot feminist lurkers in this sub got taken down-yet someone who posted against it, now has a thread on "How to welcome feminists INTO our MRA sub"....!!Also it's not like in their quest to be "open minded" and give a platform to people that themselves deny MRAs a platform they don't take down threads and posts. They do: just instead of the trolls or people trying to co-opt the MRM, they take down threads and posts by MRAs. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 05:59 PM |
| 4 | My post on how to spot feminist lurkers in this sub got taken down-yet someone who posted against it, now has a thread on "How to welcome feminists INTO our MRA sub"....!!Average r/mensrights thread in 2022: https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u7tv6n/warning\_to\_feminists\_on\_this\_sub/ /u/Razorbladekandyfan what are your thoughts? | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 05:58 PM |
| 2 | My post on how to spot feminist lurkers in this sub got taken down-yet someone who posted against it, now has a thread on "How to welcome feminists INTO our MRA sub"....!!They didn't, they just took it down. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 05:54 PM |
| 3 | My post on how to spot feminist lurkers in this sub got taken down-yet someone who posted against it, now has a thread on "How to welcome feminists INTO our MRA sub"....!!And now this thread has been taken down. https://np.reddit.com/r/Pro_Male_Collective/search/?q=mensrights&restrict_sr=1&sr_nsfw= https://np.reddit.com/r/Advancing_Male_Rights/comments/rpz3rp/clearest_evidence_yet_of_rmensrights_mods_being/ https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u6mq8e/simple_tips_to_make_spotting_femtroll_lurkers/ | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 05:54 PM |
| 2 | My post on how to spot feminist lurkers in this sub got taken down-yet someone who posted against it, now has a thread on "How to welcome feminists INTO our MRA sub"....!!They haven't been infiltrated, they always had a different agenda other than men's rights. That's one reason this sub has made no progress since its inception. | /r/MensRights | 21/04/22 05:53 PM |
| 2 | What do you think of the redpill and the blackpill?Here is some misandry from one of the respected voices in the redpill community, Chateau Heartiste/Roissy: https://archive.md/vgRbS Notice the similarities? https://np.reddit.com/r/ProMaleCollective/comments/t2cpp5/progressive_feminists_from_the_sub/ https://np.reddit.com/r/FDSredpills/comments/t5vjt0/while_it_seems_like_an_innocent_question_id_like/ | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 09:09 AM |
| 2 | What do you think of the redpill and the blackpill?It's not surprising given the misandry of blackpillers (but also the mimickry by feminists of 'anti-feminist' male groups). | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 09:06 AM |
| 5 | What do you think of the redpill and the blackpill?It's crap and has nothing to do with men's rights. It doesn't matter that documentary on men's rights that came out years back was called "The Red Pill". The redpill as it is now has nothing to do with men's rights. And the blackpill as others here have said is completely misandrist. There was even a radical feminist ban evasion sub called r/BlackPillFeminism | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 08:55 AM |
| 2 | Simple tips to make spotting Femtroll Lurkers easier: More and more feminists are organising & brigading & lurking in our sub all the time, pretending to be MRA posters but derailing/posting hate/disrupting Here's a collection of tips from various MRA posters on tell tale signs of such femlurkers.The biggest issue is what threads and posts mods let through. This thread was just deleted. They are more than capable of deleting threads and posts if they want to. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 05:42 AM |
| 1 | Despite Young Men being the only ones who are forced, even against their will, to die in hellish wars: the elite-mainstream narrative is that Girls are the primary victims [Article: "Women & Girls Experience the Worst of War]"our subs" Your thread calling attention to this troll problem was just removed. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u6mq8e/simple_tips_to_make_spotting_femtroll_lurkers/ | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 05:37 AM |
| 4 | [META] What if we dedicated this subreddit to women's rights, on women's days -- to show by example what it means to advocate for your own side, but truly, and equally, care for the other? A sign of alliance, being the bigger person, and much more.You might want to also save this for future reference: mods on this sub just removed the thread above. See, they are more than capable of removing threads and posts. | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 05:34 AM |
| 2 | Simple tips to make spotting Femtroll Lurkers easier: More and more feminists are organising & brigading & lurking in our sub all the time, pretending to be MRA posters but derailing/posting hate/disrupting Here's a collection of tips from various MRA posters on tell tale signs of such femlurkers.This thread by /u/Alarming_Draw has been removed by the mods here now. They are more than capable of deleting when they want, so the ship has already sailed on how "mods shouldn't just delete posts". | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 05:29 AM |
| 8 | [META] What if we dedicated this subreddit to women's rights, on women's days -- to show by example what it means to advocate for your own side, but truly, and equally, care for the other? A sign of alliance, being the bigger person, and much more.It's the modding on this sub: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u6mq8e/simple_tips_to_make_spotting_femtroll_lurkers/ All in the name of selective free speech and "taking the higher ground". | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 04:19 AM |
| 3 | Simple tips to make spotting Femtroll Lurkers easier: More and more feminists are organising & brigading & lurking in our sub all the time, pretending to be MRA posters but derailing/posting hate/disrupting Here's a collection of tips from various MRA posters on tell tale signs of such femlurkers.No, because the mods here already delete many threads and posts already that are way more related to men's rights than the blatantly fake posts that have been getting through. If these posts aren't approved in the first place (the ones deliberately trying to group MRAs with "incels" that try to sympathize with them and the ones responding to such posts conveniently soon after claiming this place is an "incel" echochamber), no one here will ever see it, since those posts won't be approved, and ju… | /r/MensRights | 19/04/22 03:42 AM |
| 7 | When do we get artificial wombs ?I've been telling you guys: they are using "incel" themes to try and get this sub taken down (along with a few actual "incels" trying to invade). Don't fall for this crap. It's not your fault (the portion of the member base that isn't incel or blackpill or sympathetic to those hijackers) but the mod team really needs to do better or this sub is as good as controlled opposition. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 09:17 PM |
| 18 | Simple tips to make spotting Femtroll Lurkers easier: More and more feminists are organising & brigading & lurking in our sub all the time, pretending to be MRA posters but derailing/posting hate/disrupting Here's a collection of tips from various MRA posters on tell tale signs of such femlurkers.They also pretend to be incels like in the following linked post and make it seem like all is lost and that this group is more like MGTOW and wants to "replace" women. When in actuality they have post history in feminist subs like WitchesVsPatriarchy or have barely posted here in the last few months. Always check their post history. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u6k5ia/when_do_we_get_artificial_wombs/?sort=new Posted by u/GarlicGuitar 2 hours ago When do we get artificial wombs … | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 09:04 PM |
| 17 | When do we get artificial wombs ?Why do you post on the feminist sub WitchesVsPatriarchy? https://archive.ph/J5y7m https://archive.ph/bOdx6 https://archive.ph/sNwNy This seems like fake defeatism on your part. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 08:53 PM |
| 3 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditNo where did I say this and please help me understand how you heard me ask this. From the original definition an incel is essentially someone shunned and ostracized by women and who can't attract women. A boy cannot be an 'incel' when they are 6 years old, that is just ridiculous. If the boy becomes an 'incel', it's because later on they are shunned and ostracized by women, not when they are 6 years old. What I was sympathizing with and trying to get you to sympathize with, is the 6 year old boy… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 07:46 AM |
| 2 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditHmm… I really had to think about that. What do you think it was that brought me to this sub? I mean, it was my bleeding heart. My empathy for the struggles that are unique to boys and men. There's a difference between being compassionate and sympathizing with everyone that you are grouped in with. Men's rights groups are grouped in with people like 'incels' on purpose to make it easier for men's rights groups to get deplatformed and more easily portray them as sexually frustrated. Edit: oh I rer… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 06:51 AM |
| 2 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditYou are being deliberately contrarian and trying to save people that don't want to be saved. MRAs versus incels are like regular religious people versus religious extremists. Do you reach out to and try to be friendly with religious extremists? No, you just avoid them. Are religious extremists interested in hearing the opinions from those that aren't extremists or want their help? No, they look down on them and think they are useless and should be gotten rid of. Your bleeding heart approach is g… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 04:40 AM |
| 4 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditThe point is: mgtow reached out to incels initially like some here are interested in doing. In response, they got insulted and mocked just as much if not more than they were getting insulted and mocked by feminists already. There were regular mgtow bashing threads on incel forums calling them incels in denial. The same thing will happen to MRAs that reach out to incels. Incels don't want to be helped, in fact they take it as an insult, unless you believe and support them in everything they do. A… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 04:15 AM |
| 6 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditincels of the future we can prevent from being created. No there's no way to do that if you actually look at what they are about and what their grievances are (not being attractive enough to women to get unpaid sex (not prostitution, which they consider a 'cope')). Now that this term and identity is out there, it's probably not going away. And yes it is as much the fault of people throwing around this term to insult males. If they really cared about stopping the spread, they'd stop using it. It'… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 03:33 AM |
| 4 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditSuppose a involuntary virgin opens up on the internet to seek help, if people are mean to him it is more likely he will become an "incel" (by your definition). These borderline "incels" can be saved if we show a little empathy. Okay so that goes back to what I said: you shouldn't mock them, but don't try to reach out to them either. Clearly it's best they are left alone. If you try to reach out to them, they will take it the wrong way, ultimately get angry because they feel you are wasting their… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 03:19 AM |
| 3 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditIf incels are this horrible group which has one forum speak on behalf of all it's members then maybe people shouldn't throw the term around so much and we'd take it seriously. If I plot how many times I've been called 'incel' against how many sexual partners I have had you'd find a strange trend would show itself. And I never said that the term should be thrown around repeatedly. People doing this are wrong and clearly don't care about stopping this, they just want to demoralize MRAs into silenc… | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 03:12 AM |
| 6 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditIt is still an example of misandry by these groups. The MRM imo shouldn't be so quick to support groups that they are conflated when upon further inspection, these groups say the same kind of thing that radical feminists say. | /r/MensRights | 18/04/22 03:09 AM |
| 1 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditIve seen far worst things said everyday on most feminist subs. They are posting of wanting most men to die so that they can get laid and making fun of transgender women that get drafted in Ukraine. This is similar to what is said on subs like fourthwavewomen and other TERF subs. The debate here is NOT about the Incel sub. The debate is about how bad femtrolls are getting and the tactics they are using. IncelTear is a bad sub, no question, and they should have been banned (and probably would have… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/22 07:34 PM |
| -10 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditDefending them doesn't mean justifying their actions. Most incels don't go on the internet spewing misogyny. The term has become irreparably associated with the online incel forums. Feminists and tradcons are solving the incel problem for last decade and they have, all other male issues, made it 10x worse. Incels need mental help not shunning. They are making it worse by labeling everyone they don't like as an "incel". That should be pushed back on, but defending incels will make it easier for o… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/22 07:29 PM |
| -8 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditWhy are people here obsessed with defending incels when they make misandrist statements? This does have to do with the issue at hand, a reason that IncelTear is screenshotting this sub more is that there have been numerous posts here lately defending incels, this being the most recent post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/u5caiz/incel\_is\_the\_misandry\_equivalent\_of\_misogynys/ | /r/MensRights | 17/04/22 07:25 PM |
| -12 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditThere is a middle ground between shaming incels and defending them. The MRM doesn't have an obligation to defend them when incels frequently make statements like the ones above on their forums. At the same time, the MRM can avoid shaming them and not weigh in or reach out to them, leaving it to feminsts and tradcons to do so instead (which they are more than eager to do). The MRM should not be needlessly contrarian and defend every group they are conflated with. Defending incels leads nowhere go… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/22 05:59 PM |
| 19 | People from r/IncelTears are posting screenshots of posts on this subredditr/IncelTears is the old sub that got made private by the original mod in 2020 because he didn't like the direction the sub was going. You are thinking of r/IncelTear (which isn't private as of now) and yes they are a brigading and harassment sub like others here have said. Making posts defending incels though will keep attracting them. There is no reason to defend actual incels when they say things like this on their forums: https://archive.ph/tRxb0 https://archive.is/jthot https://archive.ph/KJ… | /r/MensRights | 17/04/22 05:15 PM |
| 1 | Society doesn’t care about men’s issues, it just wants men to become ‘better men’ when criticising masculinityWhen using terms like gynocentrism and disposability, I'm not saying them in a literal sense, I'm ultimately using those terms to describe how sexists see men. It’s something that people need to stand up against, I'm not buying into their hate filled ideology. Inadvertently though, all it ends up doing is validating such concepts as something completely natural and not in the slightest bit artificially enforced through laws and precedents that come from such laws. Yes such people do see men as '… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/22 10:58 PM |
| 1 | Society doesn’t care about men’s issues, it just wants men to become ‘better men’ when criticising masculinityWhen it comes to people like this https://np.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/u14bp8/why\_are\_children\_and\_old\_people\_sent\_to\_the\_front/ https://np.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/u2f4zk/how_can_finland_rank_4th_on_the_gender_equality/ Yes it definitely is sexism, and it's coming from them, that's why they don't want it pointed out. But remember that as much as it doesn't seem true, you are still part of "society". There are just groups in society (namely feminists, tradit… | /r/MensRights | 14/04/22 10:16 PM |
| 7 | Boys "at greater risk" than girls of falling behind in school: Report"Masculinity" is an excuse that both feminists and traditionalists use to dismiss male problems. It's a manipulative term. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/22 10:06 AM |
| 7 | Swinging votersMen can be just as much swing voters as women are. Many men switch which party they vote for because they feel the party they used to vote for doesn't represent them anymore. Politicians from other parties exploit that by paying lip service to men's rights issues but not actually doing much about it policy wise. Unfortunately this lip service is often effective. | /r/MensRights | 11/04/22 09:56 AM |
| 20 | Why do people get so upset by the word "female"?Those kinds of subs (including the other mocking subs that proclaim to only go after 'incels' and 'neckbeards') is full of radical feminists that are looking for a reason to accuse any guy that doesn't toe the line of misogyny. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/22 02:38 PM |
| 4 | Police: Girlfriend allegedly stabs boyfriend to death, currently facing no charges. This just shows how much safer we are keeping to ourselves singleNo need for that, police officers and judges simply need to be fired and barred from the occupation if they refuse to treat men and women equally under the law, as it shows a gross dereliction of their job duty on their part and allowing such biased people to remain in those positions ensures such injustices will continue. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/22 03:01 AM |
| 2 | UK: Transport for London says Staring is a crime.Also related https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbk3iJqmjNU and mainstreaming of the TERF dogwhistle "male violence" | /r/MensRights | 09/04/22 09:54 AM |
| 15 | What is the general consensus of this sub on the work done by r/menslib?Another thing I left out is that a power user on that sub is a frequent poster on SubredditDrama, a crybully type of sub that regularly brigades and harasses people that don't have feminist viewpoints and gets away with breaking reddit content policy. One of the power users there (something, something don't break the circlejerk) is a part time troll whose persona involves demoralizing anti-feminists and harassing them and pretending he's joking while overseeing brigades. Such a thing happened to… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/22 09:07 AM |
| 71 | What is the general consensus of this sub on the work done by r/menslib?They are a terrible sub that constantly bash MRAs and are only concerned about men's rights if it means men might disengage from being active feminist allies https://np.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/tvfv7c/why_young_men_of_color_are_joining/i3c05k5/?context=3 They also are quick to accuse any anti-feminist group of racism https://np.reddit.com/r/MensLib/comments/tsm6tg/how_a_bad_zoom_date_led_me_to_the_black_manosphere/ and display apathy towards repealing male conscription (as shown by the apat… | /r/MensRights | 07/04/22 02:27 AM |
| 2 | A Woman's Take On the Men's Rights Movement | Hannah CoxI find it kind of funny that a comment has appeared on that article demonstrating exactly the kind of people men's rights activists should NOT be willing to work with or hear out however ford ofthecrow Oh, cry me a river. White men are accustomed to ruling the world and having every benefit that goes along with it. They're quickly discovering they are no longer the center of the Universe, and times have changed (for the better, I might add). Garbage like this perpetuates the myth that somehow me… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 11:34 PM |
| 3 | A Woman's Take On the Men's Rights Movement | Hannah CoxGiven that this woman is a libertarian, unfortunately the topic of funding for men's health didn't come up and would probably be viewed as big government overreach. If the men's rights movement could gain more traction among centrist or liberal people, this topic could gain more importance. Quality of life declines substantially for older aged men, and part of that is because men's health is severely underfunded. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 11:22 PM |
| 1 | Staring is now a crime In London. Keep your eyes down lads.They really will complicate many lives. Two genders shouldn't hate each other, they are created for union. This absurd regulation from the article will make dating more difficult. Who cares? That isn't what should be focused on here. What should be focused on is increasing infringement on people because they are male. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 11:19 PM |
| 3 | A Woman's Take On the Men's Rights Movement | Hannah CoxAlso it's good to learn from mistakes made in the past. In the past, many women that supported the men's rights movement did so for the wrong reasons, mistaking it to be a movement trying to bring back traditionalism and enforce shaming of men that aren't manly and not successful. Men's rights activists highlighted them thinking it would save them from being seen as a backwards movement, but it only ended up alienated many men. Additionally, men waiting on women to advocate for them is just not … | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 11:14 PM |
| 2 | A Woman's Take On the Men's Rights Movement | Hannah CoxThe problem is when people don't want to change and are there for different reasons. Manosphere groups are in men's rights spaces to spread their ideology. It is pretty obvious. They aren't interested in anything else. Their comments fixating on women's sexuality are used to smear the men's rights movement and portray them as rapists and people that want to harm others. Manipulating people into change doesn't work as good as you think it does, it only leads to them incorporating your attempts at… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 11:07 PM |
| 2 | A Woman's Take On the Men's Rights Movement | Hannah CoxNo, that is mis-placed sympathy. If they want to participate, they need to be willing to leave their ideological baggage behind or at least not constantly push their ideology. You can't force people to change and inviting them in while they are still ideologically minded is to them an invitation to brigade and hijack for their own causes. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 10:53 PM |
| 1 | A Woman's Take On the Men's Rights Movement | Hannah CoxMRAs aren't redpilled, redpillers don't even consider MRAs to be redpilled by the very fact that they are still trying to change 'the system'. The redpill label is a dead label anyway full of people that are completely opposed to the idea of men's rights. It is better avoided. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 10:52 PM |
| 5 | Women Are Perceived as Happy Whereas Men Are Seen as AngryAn example of this which is propagated by feminists: men's rights activists that state grievances they have with inequalities against men are always portrayed as wanting to hurt women or extremely angry people that need to be watched, no matter how they state their objections to unequal treatment men face. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 10:45 PM |
| 2 | A Woman's Take On the Men's Rights Movement | Hannah CoxAt this point MGTOW and incels are ideologically very similar. | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 10:33 PM |
| 19 | I genuinely hope the men's rights will never become like feminismIf there isn't a certain amount of gatekeeping that necessarily has to infringe on some speech by design, men's rights subs will never move past the stage of being constantly challenged by their self appointed critics. Allowing trolls and people that press people with debates just for the sake of it is another thing that stalled activity on this and other men's rights subs. If people hostile or neutral to men's rights do not offer men's rights activists a platform, men's rights communities s… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 10:28 PM |
| 1 | Should The Men's Rights Activists Leave an r/MensRights Mark on r/Place?What is proves is that equality can't exist as long as you allow these sort of biased and unreasonable power mods to make the rules, not that it doesn't exist. Power mod takeover has real life parallels too, including in the gaming, comic, anime and manga industry: https://www.reddit.com/r/Feminist_Censorship/ Pointing this out was imo the original focus of "gamergate" before it got derailed by culture war hijackers (including people that insisted on seeing everything from a racial lens and an e… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 05:01 AM |
| 3 | Many Men become disposableWhile I don't think that the biological argument should be used to rationalize male disposability, I do think it is a valid explanation for why males are treated as more disposable by society. It isn't. The reason is laws treating men inhumanely and people rationalizing that it must be because men are "disposable". It's an attempt to brush off men's issues and justify never doing anything about it. No, if you insist just for the sake of it that men are "biologically disposable" you basically voi… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/22 03:51 AM |
| 2 | Suicide Forums in a Dying Society — Institutions like The New York Times blame “incel forums” for suicides. They’re ignoring the deeper problem.On the other hand, male sexlessness isn’t necessarily an indicator that someone has internalized the incel playbook. Not by itself. But this thread is specifically talking about the incel subculture and ideological incels, which imo are a trap to discuss, as it is easy to paint the MRM as sympathizing with sexually frustrated angry people that want to do harm to others. Some men definitely struggle to connect with women and sometimes it can be because of things they don’t always control (speech … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 09:45 PM |
| 3 | Suicide Forums in a Dying Society — Institutions like The New York Times blame “incel forums” for suicides. They’re ignoring the deeper problem.They do use the same anti-feminist rhetoric as some here. That's because they copy it (just like MGTOWs copied the rhetoric from men's rights movements to give legitimacy to their ideas) and make it harder to distinguish between them and MRAs. That means nothing though, since their goals are different than the goals of the men's rights movement. People that would have you believe differently are those like feminists and traditionalists that want to deliberately confuse MRAs with incels to make i… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 08:31 PM |
| 3 | Suicide Forums in a Dying Society — Institutions like The New York Times blame “incel forums” for suicides. They’re ignoring the deeper problem.No, they have actual forums. There is such a thing ideologically as incels, but they aren't people that the MRM should associate with. They have no interest in men's rights, they are interested in spreading their agenda, which is making it easier in society for them to get unpaid sex with women and them wanting to be more physically attractive to women. Considering the issues they have with getting sex as men's rights issues trivializes actual men's rights issues. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 05:33 PM |
| -7 | Suicide Forums in a Dying Society — Institutions like The New York Times blame “incel forums” for suicides. They’re ignoring the deeper problem.You willingly overlook the misandry, racism and genocidal outlooks of ideological incels. Such people don't deserve sympathy, they have nothing in common with the men's rights movement. The MRM doesn't have a reckoning, duty or obligation to deal with incels. That's a feminist and traditionalist talking point designed to draw the MRM further into distraction over culture war issues and in an attempt to associate the MRM with incels. Male sexlessness is not a men's rights issue and insisting that… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 05:26 PM |
| -3 | Suicide Forums in a Dying Society — Institutions like The New York Times blame “incel forums” for suicides. They’re ignoring the deeper problem.They also hate gay men, mock transgender women that are forced to remain and die in Ukraine (https://archive.ph/KJYgf) and condone sexual abuse of male minors (https://archive.ph/G0w5s). | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 02:55 PM |
| 1 | Many Men become disposableI posted np embedded links where posts cannot be upvote or downvote brigaded. I also post on both subs I linked as an example of what I was talking about in my post. There is no hostile intent or intent to brigade here. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 02:40 PM |
| 0 | Suicide Forums in a Dying Society — Institutions like The New York Times blame “incel forums” for suicides. They’re ignoring the deeper problem.We need to be more sympathetic towards men who are legitimately suffering, and that includes incels. You can be sympathetic to single and sexless men without sympathizing with ideological incels. Ideological incels routinely engage in hatred towards other men, advocating violence and castration (https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/means-apos-incel-apos-why-040030173.html), calling unattractive men "subhumans" and engaging in racist talk and dehumanization of men of color. They also make excuses for … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 02:20 PM |
| 10 | Many Men become disposableThe people making these sorts of rationalization need to start being identified as playing a part in condoning harm that is done to men and boys, such as the recent Bucha massacre where males were slaughtered. It needs to be made socially unacceptable. They don't deserve praise for making these arguments. They aren't saying anything worth saying or speaking "harsh truths". It is no exaggeration, the same arguments used to justify slavery and oppression in the past, because of a "natural" or "gen… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 01:30 PM |
| 9 | Suicide Forums in a Dying Society — Institutions like The New York Times blame “incel forums” for suicides. They’re ignoring the deeper problem.It is the depressed part of the MRM. They aren't part of the MRM, not anymore than PUAs that are interested in gaming women in southeast Asian countries like Thailand are. Which is to say they aren't a part of the MRM at all. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 01:18 PM |
| 24 | Many Men become disposableThe rationalizations for male mistreatment in the comments of that thread are revolting. If men's rights activists do not speak up on this issue, others will and put their dehumanizing misandrist spin on it. Silence is not an option. People (even self proclaimed feminists) are repeating traditionalist and pill type arguments rationalizing the dehumanizing treatment of men, which even misandrists from places like female dating strategy and fourthwavewomen have started championing. People that use… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 01:14 PM |
| 2 | Nothing upsets me more as a feminist is seeing the small few incels ruin this movement because they don’t like women, keep it up lads women rights are mens rights too, <3LOL you are here right now spewing promotion of mgtow and made a tradcon type of comment here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/twc6vc/i_feel_worthless_as_a_man_because_of_conscription/i3elpbr/?context=3 You really don't realize how much of a cultist you sound like repeating the same thing many other mgtow constantly repeat. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 05:13 AM |
| 3 | Why do incels exist? My thoughts are belowOkay, I had never come across incel 'propaganda' but I guess it exists. Their propaganda is that what they are about is about more than just seeking unpaid sex with women and being extremely upset that they can't get it. No at their core that's exactly what they are about: seeking unpaid sex with women and wanting to be attractive, everything else is just "cope" (including men's rights) to them. I had no idea they have an interest in men's rights. They don't, it's just lip service and to try to … | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 03:04 AM |
| 4 | 19-year-old woman who punched an elderly man unconscious in the street, causing him to fall to the ground, hit his head and then die a week later, is cleared of causing his death. Instead, she was charged with "wounding" and given a six-month curfewIt's a possible motivation for why they would make it up in order to absolve this woman. This is something ideologically motivated people do. And ideologies that would lead them to doing this are in line with what feminism and traditionalism encourage (leniency and benefit of the doubt for women, no mercy or understanding for men). | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 12:19 AM |
| 4 | 19-year-old woman who punched an elderly man unconscious in the street, causing him to fall to the ground, hit his head and then die a week later, is cleared of causing his death. Instead, she was charged with "wounding" and given a six-month curfewFeminists have a history (specifically in the UK it seems) of advocating for more lenient sentences for women and making excuses for crimes women commit under the excuse of insanity, abuse or trauma, or right away forgiving them and voiding their sentence as long as they apologize in a "heartfelt and sincere" way something they'd never do for men, since men have collective guilt in their view while women are individuals that are misunderstood. The two "experts" here are probably not all ideologi… | /r/MensRights | 05/04/22 12:11 AM |
| 9 | I feel worthless as a man because of conscription (Rant)Your feelings are understandable. An effective men's rights movement is not here to validate the rhetoric of people that rationalize such abuses of those who are male. Please sign these petitions to show your support for opposing the harm male conscription does and for advocating removal of male conscription: https://chng.it/FLZSxKs4 https://chng.it/FFYRT2Yc Please also consider reaching out to the National Coalition for Men (NCFM) and encouraging them to keep up the effort in opposing male co… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/22 10:58 PM |
| 4 | Nothing upsets me more as a feminist is seeing the small few incels ruin this movement because they don’t like women, keep it up lads women rights are mens rights too, <3This is what actual 'incel' forums are all about: https://archive.is/T7NXw https://archive.is/jthot https://archive.ph/KJYgf https://archive.ph/G0w5s There isn't anything remotely pro men's rights about them. And saying "hate them, insult them, dismiss them... at your peril." almost sounds like you are sticking up for them when they act out. How did that go for MGTOW? They started getting called MSTOW and 'incels in denial' by those same people they sympathized with. If you are on this sub you a… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/22 10:32 PM |
| 2 | Nothing upsets me more as a feminist is seeing the small few incels ruin this movement because they don’t like women, keep it up lads women rights are mens rights too, <3They've always been here. There's a lot of stranded MGTOW and incel people here though lately too since all their subs got banned and they know reddit is still the best effective way to reach as broad an audience for their ideology as possible. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/22 10:18 PM |
| 6 | Dancing With Myself... a temporary Incel Anthem.Maybe it's time that the term 'incel' lost its convenient anti-social connotations and was recognised as a phase which most men have been through in their search No, not as long as this is what actual 'incel' forums are all about: https://archive.is/T7NXw https://archive.is/jthot https://archive.ph/KJYgf https://archive.ph/G0w5s You've just got to embrace it and pretend that you don't care. Embracing it is stupid, just like embracing the title of a neonazi after you are labeled that is stupid.… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/22 08:22 AM |
| 5 | As Russia drafts young men, some fear ending up on Ukraine’s front lineIn the comments: mocking men who find ways like 'bone spurs' to avoid being drafted labeling men who 'bribe' their way out as corrupt those who are outraged by this aren't moreso angry at this human rights violation, rather they don't give a damn, and instead use this to air their partisan politics and foreign policy vendettas 11Foxtrot40 So Russians can bribe their way out of military service? It's no wonder Cadet Bone Spurs loves Russia! DataDrivenFP Tell the recruiters to fill their pockets w… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/22 04:27 AM |
| 9 | Why do incels exist? My thoughts are belowno they don't, you fell for their propaganda https://archive.is/T7NXw https://archive.is/jthot https://archive.ph/KJYgf https://archive.ph/G0w5s Their main concern is with getting unpaid sex with women. Like other groups they pay lip service to men's rights issues just to seem like it's more than that. Just because feminists conflate MRAs with incels doesn't mean you have to sympathize with them. Similarly, when feminists conflate MRAs with nazis or the alt-right that shouldn't mean you should s… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/22 03:32 AM |
| 8 | I think this article is saying 'even though mostly men are dying in Ukraine, we need to focus more on the women who are suffering'. Its not at all clear what the author proposes should be done to help the women.In conflicts where similar dynamics are at play, we see little time in the urgency of battle to train these civilian men and women (and others) who mobilise. Any training provided tends to focus on arms handling skills rather than vital concepts of how to wage war in ways compatible with human rights, international humanitarian law, and civilian protection standards. Not surprisingly, levels of human rights abuses, war crimes, and crimes against humanity are higher in conflicts where civilians a… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/22 03:17 AM |
| 1 | Should The Men's Rights Activists Leave an r/MensRights Mark on r/Place?A reddit admin is apparently controlling which tiles can be seen and overwriting tiles they don't like. Another admin (the same one that openly said that men aren't considered a vulnerable group) claims this is in the name of safety. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/22 02:37 AM |
| 1 | Should The Men's Rights Activists Leave an r/MensRights Mark on r/Place?After seeing this probably not. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/22 06:45 PM |
| 2 | Men Made This – A Voice for MenTo the point the article makes in the later paragraphs: there's men that seem to get some sort of pleasure out of being considered the ones called on to sacrifice themselves. The bigger problem is that they aren't satisfied with just this but having all other men around them share the same fate and working to that end to see that happen. The ideas of "what is means to be a man" and "masculinity" can be used as very manipulative concepts to get men view double standards against them as something … | /r/MensRights | 03/04/22 12:33 PM |
| 7 | It's hilarious when someone's best argument against you is calling you an MRA for being subbed here.A good criticism even feminists have pointed out about many 'egalitarians' is that many 'egalitarians' are simply contrarians that are too scared about being thought of as MRAs even if they make almost the same exact points as them many times. Many 'egalitarians' also seem to think the very idea of "men's rights" is ridiculous and hold to the idea that feminism simply went too far but that MRAs aren't helping, even though MRAs haven't even been able to get much done or affected things significan… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/22 10:24 AM |
| 7 | It's hilarious when someone's best argument against you is calling you an MRA for being subbed here.It makes zero sense to be in a men's rights sub if you don't identify with or support men's rights and express hesitance of even being called an MRA. Also the OP appears to have made this post because they don't like being called an MRA. What are MRAs supposed to do for such people? If they can't bear the idea of being labeled an MRA then maybe MRA subs and issues are something they shouldn't get involved with. They clearly see "MRA" as a dirty word and inevitably it's posts like this (when they… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/22 02:14 AM |
| 8 | It's hilarious when someone's best argument against you is calling you an MRA for being subbed here.Yes these claims about MRAs becoming hateful and toxic are tossed around all the time very easily but specific examples are rarely provided. It becomes too easy to claim MRAs are something that they are not when this is done. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/22 01:09 AM |
| 1 | The usage of barrier troops and cannon fodder in war proves that male conscription is rooted in male disposability, not in the idea that society thinks women are too weak to handle themselvesHe was also apparently banning opposition media as far back as 2021 and accusing them of being "Kremlin supported" (an easy and vague charge for him to make to justify banning opposition media, just like any politician that would claim to be censoring their opposition in the interest of "national security") https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/2/5/ukraines-president-bans-pro-russian-networks-risking-support | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 10:42 AM |
| 2 | The usage of barrier troops and cannon fodder in war proves that male conscription is rooted in male disposability, not in the idea that society thinks women are too weak to handle themselvesYes, someone should also show them the petition linked by ABCAJB to show that there is support for them starting litigation again. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 10:38 AM |
| 4 | The usage of barrier troops and cannon fodder in war proves that male conscription is rooted in male disposability, not in the idea that society thinks women are too weak to handle themselvesHe has also engaged in irresponsible rhetoric saying things out loud like "World War 3 might have already started" and trying to shame countries like Israel into giving him weapons by comparing the ongoing situation to the Holocaust. He clearly cares more about his perceived legacy and ego and is willing to literally fight to the last man to keep that perception of him intact. He doesn't deserve praise for this nor should it be proof of his alleged bravery, quite the opposite. And it must be rep… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 10:37 AM |
| 1 | The usage of barrier troops and cannon fodder in war proves that male conscription is rooted in male disposability, not in the idea that society thinks women are too weak to handle themselvesI even suggested to the NCFM and to anyone if they or anybody is interested in starting a fundraiser such as a go fund me specifically for this lawsuit but no one has really answered saying they are interested in starting a fundraiser. I am seeking more information from people that are in touch with the NCFM such as /u/Razorbladekandyfan A go fund me fundraiser for this purpose is a good idea and should be shared on all men's rights subs if they decide to proceed with such an effort. To answer t… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 07:53 AM |
| 3 | The usage of barrier troops and cannon fodder in war proves that male conscription is rooted in male disposability, not in the idea that society thinks women are too weak to handle themselvest unfortunately it might take a long time for the NCFM to get another lawsuit to the supreme court.The NCFM is currently trying to get as much funding as possible to start a new lawsuit which is why it is very important to donate to them if you can and even though it is still important to start a new lawsuit as soon as possible to declare the current selective service system as unconstitutional Yes but it would be helpful for them to say what amount they are seeking (whether in the hundreds, tho… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 06:46 AM |
| 4 | The usage of barrier troops and cannon fodder in war proves that male conscription is rooted in male disposability, not in the idea that society thinks women are too weak to handle themselvesThe best option is (and was) getting the Supreme Court to rule male conscription unconstitutional so that selective service registration and drafting procedures would be halted. That never happened because the Supreme Court punted the issue to Congress, where senators and representatives proceeded to politicize the issue and draw it into the culture war, mainly because of the gender neutral conscription provision potentially putting women at risk like men currently are. However if the provision … | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 05:20 AM |
| 1 | The usage of barrier troops and cannon fodder in war proves that male conscription is rooted in male disposability, not in the idea that society thinks women are too weak to handle themselvesClearly Zelenskyy believes to risk women's lives is unacceptable but believes leaving men age 18 to 60 in a potential war zone to be killed by Russian air strikes and invading troops that shoot them on sight is fine. From his policy where border guards are turning away all men that want to evacuate, preventing them from leaving is apparently even more desirable, especially if it means he can get support for more weaponry. After all, what use are strikes on an abandoned city for trying to shore u… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 03:43 AM |
| 1 | The usage of barrier troops and cannon fodder in war proves that male conscription is rooted in male disposability, not in the idea that society thinks women are too weak to handle themselvesThis issue has again gained prominence again because of Zelenskyy preventing men in Ukraine from ages 18 to 60 from leaving Ukraine, as a way of Zelenskyy using such men as hostage negotiating tools and 'acceptable' casualties as a way to plead for more weaponry to be sent to Ukraine and to portray a dire war zone situation unfolding in Ukraine. This is not right and Zelenskyy deserves to be condemned for this. This must be said because if you don't identify the people that are pushing this forw… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 12:36 AM |
| 14 | It seems like these same feminist progressive women want their cake and eat it too🤦🏽The author is plugging their book and using anecdotes to justify their conclusions. More American women are childless than ever before—nearly half those of childbearing age don’t have children. While our society often assumes these women are “childfree by choice,” that’s not always true. In reality, many of them expected to marry and have children, but it simply hasn’t happened. Wrongly judged as picky or career-obsessed, they make up the “Otherhood,” a growing demographic that has gone without … | /r/MensRights | 27/03/22 12:29 AM |
| 1 | Trans RightsI think that given the way transwomen are treated (often as facing the same discriminatory laws as men and boys, simply because of how their biological sex is male), it is important to understand how transgender and transsexual MTF issues play into men's rights issues. We have seen this in the situation in Ukraine where transgender women are prevented from evacuating because they are biologically male and so (as expected of other people viewed as male) seen as needing to fight in war. https:… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/22 09:24 AM |
| 10 | Bill Maher's segment on Zelenskyy, Ukraine, and masculinity being responsible for the survival our our species, is his best in yearsDuring times of reduced conflict men are vilified for their gender, their issues backseated. Then during times of war, the usual white feather propaganda is being blasted out of every media mouthpiece. Just as importantly, men's rights activists should keep speaking out on this issue and how this occurs, as without them speaking out on this, other groups that don't have men's rights issues at heart will speak out just for the sake of contrarian takes and pointing out obvious hypocrisy and discre… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/22 07:59 AM |
| 38 | Bill Maher's segment on Zelenskyy, Ukraine, and masculinity being responsible for the survival our our species, is his best in yearsThis video is praising Zelenskyy the way he is handling the situation in Ukraine and tries to portray men being forced to fight as some sort of virtue of masculinity and a way men can justify their 'worth'. It's no different than lip service praising men only when they are forced into hardship that is done by conservatives. Also the men forced to fight are only briefly mentioned, the situation in Ukraine is mostly Maher praising Zelenskyy and acting like Zelenskyy is personally responsible for f… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/22 06:46 AM |
| 7 | If a man agrees with the principle of "put women on lifeboats ahead of men", in what way is this not internalized misandry?No it isn't your job as a male to keep others safe because you are male, this is the kind of thinking that males need to disregard. Keeping others safe is the task of people that signed up for that position. If you want to let others get to safety first before you then fine, but it's not your duty because of your biological sex, the idea that it is is how males get manipulated into sacrificing themselves and willingly make themselves second class citizens. | /r/MensRights | 22/03/22 07:10 AM |
| 4 | Yeah it's about Ukraine againI'm very sorry to hear this and I suspected that the other men of your country are not okay with what is going on or the lengths Zelenskyy seems to be going to with using their lives as bargaining tools and to make a "statement". I want to tell you though that in other countries there were wars that were ongoing that finally came to an end because there was enough opposition and people speaking out. Yes some of those people were jailed and beaten but it didn't stop the opposition. For example lo… | /r/MensRights | 22/03/22 12:38 AM |
| 5 | Yeah it's about Ukraine againSo if the volunteer military formations are oversaturated just like the Ukrainian army is, meaning that men that want to join are being turned back and they have enough people as is, then Ukrainian men being prevented from leaving almost sounds like a hostage situation and a way that Zelenskyy is trying to make a statement. As in: they are being held hostage and not allowed freedom of movement, almost to serve as willing casualties for the Ukrainian government to "send a message" to Russia that … | /r/MensRights | 21/03/22 11:41 PM |
| 3 | Yeah it's about Ukraine againThat sounds disgusting, there's been rumors that weapons are being advertised and handed out to men in the streets of Ukraine to encourage them to fight. You aren't being told to fight for your country, you are being told to fight on behalf of those that will never have to fight themselves and enjoy the heightened emotions of war and the control they can exercise over others during war. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/22 11:08 PM |
| 3 | German article, written by a woman - about the unfair treatment of men in the Ukraine warI remember the reports of "women and children first" being ordered during that incident too. It falls under discriminatory "duty to rescue" laws aimed at men and is a possibility for any man that uses public transportation and is put in an emergency evacuee situation. It's not just limited to cruise or ship sinking incidents. It's something the NCFM should address as part of their effort to stopping male conscription. More women than children survived from the Titanic. https://www.anesi.com/tita… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/22 10:29 PM |
| 7 | Yeah it's about Ukraine againThank you for responding. What are is the general view from 'fighting age' men in Ukraine on the restrictions on media that Zelenskyy has put in place? Supposedly it is for containing Russian propaganda but as stated in the earlier comment, such restrictions (particularly those aimed at leftists and socialists historically) can be used to prevent anti war rhetoric or dissension to government and military policy, specifically when it is feared that any opposition to war can result in stronger cha… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/22 10:12 PM |
| 6 | Yeah it's about Ukraine againPosting again because comment didn't show up before: First of all, no one forces us to fight, at least directly, only through shame and everyday news about how many men have returned to our country to fight and even a few stories about minor that came to volunteer, but despite this fact we are still banned from leaving. Okay, so basically they are forcing you into a corner to fight now that you have no choice to be able to escape. What is the view of Ukrainian men of 'fighting age' on this situa… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/22 08:34 PM |
| 1 | Male-Only Conscription Will Undermine Ukraine’s War EffortUpdate: more of the article and breakdown of it can be seen in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brAVbPyAPWI | /r/MensRights | 21/03/22 01:26 AM |
| 13 | I think we DO need a change among women, not just feminists, to recognize men are varied with needs & wants.We're no longer happy to be cannon fodder in war & we arent going to be pushovers when women lose it & screech in our faces-We deserve to be treated with respect & decency as much as any womaneven access to food in crises areas. Seriously. Feminists don't want to provide food to men in disaster situations. Yes: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/06/07/focus-disaster-relief-plans-women-experts-say/7575109002/ Remember when a prominent feminist asked "why can't we hate men" in a national publication and all of your enlightened "silent majority" feminists... didn't really disagree with her? https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-cant-we-hate-men/2018/06/08/f1a3a8e0-645… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/22 10:42 PM |
| 3 | Male-Only Conscription Will Undermine Ukraine’s War EffortTo read more,enter your email address then choose one of the three options below. Someone please post the full article in the comments here, not everyone wants to enter their email address just to read a single article. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/22 01:55 AM |
| 6 | List of effective organizations that help male Ukranian refugees?Anyone that joins a men's rights organization should bring up this proposal to them in meetings and in posts online where they interact with such organizations. The organizations may require more funding and donations to get it done but it is more likely they will be able to get it done than the average person that has very little resources. Existing men's rights organizations have at least some resources that can be mobilized for this effort. As can be seen, there need be a lot more men's right… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 11:06 PM |
| 1 | Selective Service Reform AWOL in 2022 NDAA (again); What Happens Now? - We MUST be active and equalize or abolish the Selective Service with NDAA 2023There are many such men's rights blogs where posters can post their own articles and answer each other and there have been for many years. The problem is those blogs are not directly connected to the few men's rights organizations that exist like the ncfm, so most of it ends up being like any talk on random blogs scattered across the internet instead of discussion to directly give ncfm members ideas and feedback and show support. Particularly when they are trying to bring forth cases against mal… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 10:21 PM |
| 1 | Selective Service Reform AWOL in 2022 NDAA (again); What Happens Now? - We MUST be active and equalize or abolish the Selective Service with NDAA 2023Here are some example blog entries where comments can be added: https://ncfm.org/2021/12/news/uncategorized/ncfm-bulgarian-liaison-plamen-lesev-draft-for-thee-but-not-for-me-us-supreme-court-and-congress-endorse-male-disposability/ https://ncfm.org/2021/04/news/discrimination-news/discrimination-against-men-news/ncfm-international-coordinator-carl-augustsson-chennai-train-rides-and-their-implications/ https://ncfm.org/2021/05/news/mens-health/ncfm-mr-manners-the-neglected-side-of-covid/ https://… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 09:58 PM |
| 2 | Selective Service Reform AWOL in 2022 NDAA (again); What Happens Now? - We MUST be active and equalize or abolish the Selective Service with NDAA 2023No you don't have to be a member, you just need to enter in a username (you can use the same username as you have on reddit) and your email address (for internet related activism things) to comment on the ncfm.org blog entries. On facebook you can use a fake alias (convincing sounding real name but not your own), a throwaway email account and a picture that isn't of you. NCFM is more active on facebook than on twitter. Twitter would otherwise have been a better place to connect with them if th… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/22 05:35 AM |
| 3 | Selective Service Reform AWOL in 2022 NDAA (again); What Happens Now? - We MUST be active and equalize or abolish the Selective Service with NDAA 2023Don't only just contribute, get engaged with them on social media, such as their blog site (ncfm.org), their facebook (https://www.facebook.com/National.Coalition.For.Men) and their twitter (page of NCFM founder/director Harry Crouch): https://twitter.com/mensadvocate). One of the things that could have been done better last time around was more outreach and collaboration between men's rights supporters and the NCFM on social media. Because there was not enough of that, tradcons like Chip Roy … | /r/MensRights | 18/03/22 09:48 PM |
| 2 | Selective Service Reform AWOL in 2022 NDAA (again); What Happens Now? - We MUST be active and equalize or abolish the Selective Service with NDAA 2023Some important details to add: republicans that insisted on the gender neutral conscription provision to be removed from the NDAA bill basically held up the bill until the provision was removed, which democrats agreed to do in return for being able to pass the bill, there wasn't a proper cloture (closing) vote. Had there been, and had the NDAA bill not been introduced so late that it was more prone to being filibustered in the senate, this likely wouldn't have occurred, the bill needed to be b… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/22 09:25 PM |
| 21 | A good article from The Spectator written by Bettina Arndt on the situation of men ages 18 to 60 being prevented from leaving Ukraine.Many times those "barbarians" end up being men on the other side being forced to fight too. It's worth remembering that "othering" and out group demonization of other men is quite common in war and it's used to justify atrocities. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 09:53 PM |
| 1 | Ukraine: Man is caught trying to cross into Moldova from Ukraine while hiding in a box of baby clothes. Detained.Yes on top of all of it, returning veterans of war were/are often treated like garbage despite them having experienced mental and physical trauma in war (still even if they weren't treating badly after returning to their home country, there would still be no valid argument for forced sacrifice and drafting). Many people simply just want to look for any reason to shame, mock and attack someone who is male and assign them collective guilt for anything bad that happens in the world. Their attitudes… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 09:42 PM |
| 31 | A good article from The Spectator written by Bettina Arndt on the situation of men ages 18 to 60 being prevented from leaving Ukraine.Notable points: One lone male voice on TikTok dared to call out the feminist silence. He attracted a wave of criticism and his video was removed. TikTok user notpoliticalspeaking had the temerity to point out that the reported 32,000 women in the Ukrainian military weren’t all that many given that – according to his estimation – the country has 17 million women of age.Social media ran hot with dozens of articles claiming the TikTok-er was being ‘called out for his ignorance and misogyny’. People… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 07:40 PM |
| 9 | "Ladies First" Or "Prioritizing women" Are Sexist!Hi - Democrat here - please list three "feminists" from the right-wing. I'll wait. I had said traditionalists (both left wing and right wing), not "feminists (both left wing and right wing)". Since you asked though, there's a list of conservative feminists here, which includes Sarah Palin and Theresa May: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conservative_feminisms https://qz.com/997788/why-dont-feminist-celebrate-the-successes-of-rightwing-female-politicians/ https://canlitguides.ca/canlit-gu… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 08:51 AM |
| 2 | I think intergender fights in MMA are clear sexist and misandry.By the nature of the activity you want to participate in (mma), as with many forms of sports where people like to emphasize strength differences between men and women as part of its appeal, people are likely to have more traditional attitudes in perceiving harm to men from women as something to laugh at or an embarrassing matter, so your request for them not to laugh when that happens may not be too realistic (just being honest). So if you are concerned about having to spar with a woman and how … | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 06:08 AM |
| 8 | I think intergender fights in MMA are clear sexist and misandry.I agree it is bullying. Sadly, bullying certain groups like vulnerable men is currently considered socially acceptable and only seems to be getting more acceptable over time. Imo some of such bullying is a result of the glorification of revenge (the same attitude that glorifies war and shames men as cowards if they refuse to participate in said war), the popularity of someone demanding respect and throwing their weight around in this way by making an example out of another man and because how so… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 05:42 AM |
| 15 | I think intergender fights in MMA are clear sexist and misandry.People still generally see it as an embarrassment if a man gets beat up by a woman because it means that he isn't capable of living up to their expectation of what a "man" should be. That is, they feel entitled to a certain outcome (the man fending off the woman) and lash out when they don't get it, covering it up with humor. It shows their bigotry against vulnerable men when they do this. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 05:28 AM |
| 2 | Suspect arrested in shootings of five homeless men in NYC and D.C.The suspect has not offered a motive and police are not certain what connection there may be between homelessness and Brevard, but they believe the acts were random. Seems clearly motivated by the suspect's hatred of having to see homeless men. Unfortunately these kinds of crimes aren't viewed that way. Hatred of homeless people is often driven by hatred of "undesirable" men but people have been slow to admit this. New York and D.C. officials were offering a $70,000 reward for information leadin… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 05:26 AM |
| 11 | "Ladies First" Or "Prioritizing women" Are Sexist!Yes and it's feminists and traditionalists (both left wing and right wing) that push for such policies, which is why they shouldn't be voted for and should be voted against. They are the biggest supporters and upholders of such policies. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 03:10 AM |
| 2 | Grim Future for Our Less Educated SonsDept of Education OCR is complicit in this. Other people that are complicit in "men falling behind" are imo companies and organizations that give preferential scholarships, internship priority and job opportunities for women. When men get passed up in favor of women, they are incorrectly portrayed as having given up when in fact they are simply passed over and not given as many opportunities, so they seem less active career wise and have less of an ability to establish themselves earlier in a ca… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 02:47 AM |
| 3 | Women > Men reflectionAnd btw. Why only men are forced? Because egotistical 'leaders' think they can get away with doing it and want to have as large an army as possible to engage in pissing contests and intimidation with the other side. Blame Zelenskyy for this one, as he gave the order that all men 18 to 60 are prohibited from leaving Ukraine. #FreedomForUkranianMen #FreedomForRussianMen | /r/MensRights | 16/03/22 02:22 AM |
| 3 | Unintended Effects Of Transgender Activism On Men’s IssuesAn engaging read. There is some specifically interesting information on page 76 of the article regarding breastfeeding and history of infant care by both sexes that serves as another figurative nail in the coffin for the idea that women make better caretakers of children than men (an argument that by itself is used to argue that men aren't as good as taking care of children and so should be sent to war instead of being able to stay at home and care for family if they choose). I agree that with e… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/22 07:26 AM |
| 1 | [article by Peter Ryan] Bio-gynocentrism: Turning Science Into Chivalry And Goddess WorshipInitially I was put off the article by the title because of how the term "gynocentrism" is often used as a catch-all term. Nonetheless, the article does a good job showing how (what I believe is more accurately known as biological determinism and should be referred to as such since it sounds less sloganeer like) is an anti-male outlook that has no place in the men's rights movement. Unfortunately, I believe biological determinism is often an element advanced by the various pills (including the… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/22 06:59 AM |
| 10 | Article: The Problem With Ukraine's Border Policy Is It's TransphobicThe omission or even acknowledgement of the possible anti-male attitudes involved in these policies (or incorrectly portraying them as "misogyny") also prevents people from correctly identifying how this incident of transphobia and transphobic policy stems from anti-male attitudes, as the policy is directed towards people born biologically male at birth, who are viewed as collectively responsible for war (a feminist idea) because they are viewed as male and because of the idea that men have to d… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/22 05:15 AM |
| 1 | Men make the laws, so it’s your fault that you don’t have equal rightsIt's a key example of how feminists (of both sexes) refuse to treat men as individuals, assign them collective guilt and like to scapegoat and victim blame them. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/22 02:35 AM |
| 2 | Throughout life, heart attacks are twice as common in men than women - Harvard HealthThis is a good reason to support funding for men's health and push for greater funding of men's health than currently. Health issues affect quality of life for men. There is some insight from past comments made here on the ncfm site and things that can be learned (including of the other health ailments men face as well as examples of past and present unhelpful ways men's health is shifted focus off): https://ncfm.org/2009/01/news/issues/mens-health/ Heart problems aren't the only issue that affe… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/22 02:00 AM |
| 5 | Men’s Rights Activists Are Making the Ukraine Crisis All About ThemselvesThis post should forever be synonymous with "Dr." Michael Flood: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ebb9mt/leaked\_notes\_from\_dr\_michael\_floods\_2011\_workshop/ | /r/MensRights | 09/03/22 02:43 AM |
| 11 | Men’s Rights Activists Are Making the Ukraine Crisis All About ThemselvesHere's them proudly tweeting out that article if you want to tell them what you think: https://twitter.com/WeAreMel/status/1499038067906260997 | /r/MensRights | 09/03/22 02:40 AM |
| 39 | I am sick and tired of hearing about men ‘volunteering’ in UkrainePretty the same thing happen to transwomen m2f, who are forced to stay, cause they are still male in the eyes of law. The kind of thing Zelenskyy is ordering with "military age" men 18 to 60 and transwomen being prevented from leaving so they can "stay and fight" is repulsive and full of misandry. Many feminists that say to blame men for making other men expendable cozy up to such people and such actions and enable them, while acting like they had no role in any of this. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/22 05:54 AM |
| 8 | Joke or not, I'd say this accurately represents all the women who used to screaming for rights without working for itLaughing these things off is not helping. The message should be and always should have been: this isn't funny and it isn't acceptable, it's "joking" about what is military slavery of men and transwomen. As the nothowgirlswork, blatantmisogyny, trollxchrosomomes and boysarequirkysubs show, it doesn't matter if you phrase attention to double standards in terms of gallows' humor, feminists will still object and accuse you of wanting to hurt women. So might as well stop joking about and downplaying … | /r/MensRights | 06/03/22 05:33 AM |
| 7 | What male privilege looks like in UkraineThere's been conflicting information. A few days before, males in the Russian controlled regions of Ukraine of a similar age range were reported as not being able to leave either. Here's what someone who lives in Ukraine had to say about it: https://np.reddit.com/r/Pro_Male_Collective/comments/swolj0/in_wake_of_escalating_tensions_between_ukraine/hxqg390/?context=3 | /r/MensRights | 25/02/22 01:27 AM |
| – | What male privilege looks like in UkraineHe means both the Ukraine and Russian government are trash for drafting men, not that the men being drafted are trash. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/22 12:31 AM |
| 1 | How to rally people and start a movement?Look for pro men's rights/pro male subs and discords. Join twitter, follow other MRAs, tweet hashtags that raise awareness of men's rights causes and help to amplify pro males messages and put pressure on social media platforms and your elected representatives for enabling misandry. There is strength and a better chance of making your point in numbers. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/22 03:32 PM |
| 2 | We need to support www.TruthSocial.comI agree. The views of the Trump family on male issues have left much to be disappointed about. Donald Trump has shamed men for fleeing countries and not putting their lives at stake to defend women and children in those countries. He's fear mongered about immigrants by saying they are mostly young men. He believes men that desert battle in war should be shot (see how he has talked about Bowe Bergdahl). His son, Donald Trump Jr., has defended conscripting only males https://np.reddit.com/r/Pro\_M… | /r/MensRights | 23/02/22 05:10 AM |
| 14 | The struggle over the future of masculinity“Men traditionally have had the responsibility to fight even when they don’t want to do so, I think there’s something to that,” Hawley said. But he called requiring women to do the same “a mistake.”" https://www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article255897056.html#storylink=cpy "Masculinity" and concerns about crises surrounding it are a fake moral panic pushed by conservatives and traditionalists (first in conservative media and then by the politicians) that want to further reduce… | /r/MensRights | 22/02/22 03:30 AM |
| 5 | Why Using The SJW Label Is Counter ProductiveSJW and woke are scapegoat terms that try to frame men's issues as part of a broader culture war. MRAs themselves have been labeled as SJW and woke as derisive insults, often by many traditionalists that are openly anti men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 05:41 PM |
| 37 | Stereotypes of male prisoners vs female prisoners in the mediaToo many people (often feminists and traditionalists) also view male prisoners as getting basic amenities and not being abused in prison (either by guards or other inmates) as them "getting off too easy". Prison rape is also viewed by these same people as corrective punishment for males that are in prison. If average men are viewed as guilty before proven innocent, men that are in prison are viewed as unquestionably guilty and not deserving of any protection from harm, no matter what crime they … | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 05:47 AM |
| 34 | he was called a coward for not giving his seat to a woman when the Titanic was sinkingI hope it is not overlooked that this was mainly because he was a man seen as not fulfilling his "honor" and not because of his race https://historyofyesterday.com/the-man-who-was-despised-for-surviving-the-titanic-6e73572b8784 Anti men's rights groups often try to derail incidents of men being shamed and mistreated as originating from race so that they can ignore or downplay anti-male bias. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/22 03:13 AM |
| 2 | For this March 8, let's collect evidence of the damage done by feminismThe idea that men are avoiding women and not carrying out a supposed role in pursuing women anymore is an idea pushed by conservatives and collapse enthusiasts too. As with other such wishful thinking and posturing, other conservatives and traditionalists then use such ideas to push the idea that men need more responsibility, like Senator Josh Hawley has done https://archive.fo/jumLS So not only is the idea that men aren't pursuing women anymore a fabrication, it's also a way conservatives the… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/22 08:18 PM |
| 6 | FDS celebrating the decline of men’s health. Seriously, are the people in that sub okay?Seriously, are the people in that sub okay? They are just fine, they are just being bigoted against males because they feel like they can get away with it without getting banned. Don't make excuses for them. | /r/AntiFeminists | 14/02/22 07:30 PM |
| 6 | FDS celebrating the decline of men’s health. Seriously, are the people in that sub okay?I found the tweet: https://twitter.com/Reaux_FDS/status/1490795224821481476?cxt=HHwWiICqhfiWr7ApAAAA Make sure you report that tweet for hate. It does more than just complaining and asking how people can be so hateful. | /r/AntiFeminists | 14/02/22 07:15 AM |
| 13 | Opinion | The data are clear: The boys are not all righthttps://web.archive.org/web/20220209092124/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/02/08/andrew-yang-boys-are-not-all-right/ Research shows that one significant factor women look for in a partner is a steady job. As men’s unemployment rises, their romantic prospects decline. Unsurprisingly, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from 1960 to 2010, the proportion of adults without a college degree who marry plummeted from just over 70 percent to roughly 45 percent. This is what … | /r/MensRights | 09/02/22 01:20 PM |
| 2 | Once you realize that Feminism is fundamentally a lie, it's easy to understand Men's Rights problems // I don't agree with some things from this post (I will point them in the comment) but the clue is EXTREMELY important for us!In all fairness to the mods on mensrights, whenever posts are removed suddenly for spam, it's usually because hostile members of a brigading sub reported it for spam. Not because the mods themselves removed that post. That seems to be exactly what occurred, judging from how not only was the mensrights thread crossposted to mock it and single out the mensrights user that originally posted that thread, but how people from againstmensrights came onto the crossposted thread to argue with and berat… | /r/AntiFeminists | 08/02/22 09:14 AM |
| 5 | Women are gaining the same privileges as males but aren’t required to register for the selective service -_-You can "thank" the following politicians for blocking or at least expressing a desire to block attempts at either getting rid of conscription altogether or pushing to keep conscription male only: Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) Senator James Lankford (R-OK) Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) Senator Steve Daines (R-MT) Senator Roger F. Wicker (R-MS) Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS) Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) Senator Mike Rounds … | /r/MensRights | 07/02/22 12:09 PM |
| 7 | Once you realize that Feminism is fundamentally a lie, it's easy to understand Men's Rights problems // I don't agree with some things from this post (I will point them in the comment) but the clue is EXTREMELY important for us!This post seems to have been falsely reported as spam by brigading users from againstmensrights. | /r/AntiFeminists | 07/02/22 11:45 AM |
| 10 | Tradcon article from The Federalist says being a man means to “Lay down your life for others” and “serve and defend others”I love how he brings up a (apocryphal) quote from Robert E. Lee. You know, the guy who thought slavery was a necessary evil. This is just like when the republican that is running for office this year (August 2022) in Florida in the 3rd Congressional District (Justin Waters, https://ballotpedia.org/Justin_Waters) who tweeted "men are meant to be expendable" tried to cite alt-right eugenicist Steve Sailor https://archive.md/o1MGj https://archive.md/gz3Es https://www.pinkerite.com/2019/12/the-racis… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 29/01/22 03:50 AM |
| 4 | At what point in time do you think this whole woke culture emerged?I used to think "woke culture" was a thing too but I have seen arguments in posts and videos from those at subs like r/pro_male_collective that convinced me that this "wokeness" is pretty much just all inter-sectionalist feminism. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/22 02:18 AM |
| 4 | At what point in time do you think this whole woke culture emerged?There is no such thing as woke culture. It's inter-sectionalist feminism and racebaiting by feminists. "Woke culture" is a term by tradcons and political grifters to shift focus off of feminism and onto their culture wars issues. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/22 01:33 AM |
| 6 | Tradcon article from The Federalist says being a man means to “Lay down your life for others” and “serve and defend others”You can find a large bevy of Feminists supporting a male only draft.Again in Feminism taking care of Men is a crime, because Men are not human beings in Feminism - nothing in Feminism ever allows Men to be cleared of original sin. Yes and many feminists are right wing and have tradcon type views. I never said feminists were an improvement over traditionalists. They were however more apathetic on this issue. It was tradcon republican politicians like Josh Hawley and Chip Roy that pushed hardest f… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/22 01:27 AM |
| 4 | To all the Men out there who Speak out on family law for change, keep it up. We face harsh opinions & they can be downright nasty. We love you, Keep up the good work!No it is not better to be a "human doing". It's a false choice. Men need to be treated as human. That's what the men's rights movement is about. You are objecting to things leftists say and saying that tradcons praising men for sacrificing themselves is somehow better. It's not. It's just empty words by tradcons. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/22 01:23 AM |
| 8 | Tradcon article from The Federalist says being a man means to “Lay down your life for others” and “serve and defend others”You implied that tradcons don't see men as tools: If it's Trad-Con v. Feminist I prefer Trad-Con, I would rather have someone who doesn't think of Men as a tool. Tradcons aren't the lesser evil. Tradcons were the ones pushing the hardest to keep male only conscription in place. Feminists and leftists were apathetic. More leftist leaning organizations like the ACLU in fact signed on to the proposal to make conscription not mandated for males only: https://www.aclu.org/cases/national-coalition-men… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/22 01:09 AM |
| 4 | To all the Men out there who Speak out on family law for change, keep it up. We face harsh opinions & they can be downright nasty. We love you, Keep up the good work!Feminists have no problem with this either. Feminists will say that it's not mutilation at all. Circumcision is declining overall I never said feminists were any better. I said that traditionalists weren't any better on that issue. Circumcision declining overall doesn't suggest that traditionalists are more opposed to it all of a sudden. I have no idea why you think this is relevant. This doesn't even seem tangential? Anti prostitution laws are geared at making men out to be predators, rapists a… | /r/MensRights | 29/01/22 01:03 AM |
| 10 | Tradcon article from The Federalist says being a man means to “Lay down your life for others” and “serve and defend others”I prefer Trad-Con, I would rather have someone who doesn't think of Men as a tool. Tradcons do see and think of men as tools though. | /r/MensRights | 29/01/22 12:13 AM |
| 22 | To all the Men out there who Speak out on family law for change, keep it up. We face harsh opinions & they can be downright nasty. We love you, Keep up the good work!Cheering on wage garnishment from men for child support is something most conservatives currently seem to support https://archive.is/iOZph | /r/MensRights | 28/01/22 11:48 PM |
| 1 | To all the Men out there who Speak out on family law for change, keep it up. We face harsh opinions & they can be downright nasty. We love you, Keep up the good work!Trad-cons at least have the human decency to protect young boys. This just isn't true. Tradcons are fully in support of policies like alimony and child support for the benefit of women (the & children part is just their "pro family" spin on things) https://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/gov-rick-scott-vetoes-controversial-alimony-bill/2273409/ https://archive.is/iOZph Also many tradcons (at least on the right wing) are religious and so have no problem with allowing the practice of m… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/22 11:44 PM |
| 16 | To all the Men out there who Speak out on family law for change, keep it up. We face harsh opinions & they can be downright nasty. We love you, Keep up the good work!Trad-cons at least have the human decency to protect young boys. This just isn't true. Tradcons are fully in support of policies like alimony and child support for the benefit of women (the & children part is just their "pro family" spin on things) https://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/gov-rick-scott-vetoes-controversial-alimony-bill/2273409/ https://archive.is/iOZph Also many tradcons (at least on the right wing) are religious and so have no problem with allowing the practice of m… | /r/MensRights | 28/01/22 11:44 PM |
| 7 | Andrew Yang supports men and boys.The modern right should lose your vote too, they backed male only conscription and are hostile against men that have any pastimes that don't involve relationships with women https://archive.fo/DrEmi https://archive.fo/jumLS | /r/MensRights | 28/01/22 08:57 AM |
| 2 | Andrew Yang supports men and boys.Okay so it gets worse: Andrew Yang furthers the traditionalist idea of "weak man bad", portrays men that aren't in a relationship as a threat and tries to tie men's issues to "incels" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3AiKw2WI9k&t=3504s | /r/MensRights | 28/01/22 08:41 AM |
| 17 | Thousands of redditors attack a male DV victim in response to the trending video of his victimization.I have seen men being accused of being "deadbeat" 'leeches' for still living at home with their parents. The term "deadbeat" is not even restricted to men that don't pay child support on time, further proof that even terms like "deadbeat" are targeted at men that have failed to carry out a provider and protector role. Also publicfreakout and other subs cheering on street fighting are full of people with a traditionalist mentality towards things. Conservatives will condemn antifa for acting this … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/01/22 08:08 AM |
| 4 | Andrew Yang supports men and boys.The tweets are a mess and full of either victim blaming or posturing. Any MRA that enters this conversation is going to need many others liking them, backing them up and retweeting them so that their voice is not lost in the usual traditionalists and feminists weighing in about "masculinity" and how men are "failing to perform". | /r/MensRights | 28/01/22 05:58 AM |
| 14 | Andrew Yang shares thoughts about mens issues on Twitter.Many men lost jobs too during the pandemic but instead Andrew Yang jumped on the bandwagon of how women need to be compensated for "unpaid work" and "emotional labor" even though men do such work too. This planned compensation was in addition to the plan to give stimulus checks to mothers. Along with stimulus checks to moms, the Marshall Plan for Moms -- proposed by Girls Who Code CEO Reshma Saujani -- calls on the Biden administration to pass policies like paid family leave and pay equity and… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/01/22 10:23 PM |
| 8 | Andrew Yang supports men and boys.If anything repeating the message without any real or sound policy will make people more accepting and apathetic towards men's issues, seeing it as another issue where they can just talk about to get votes or gain an audience for (much like grifters do with other 'controversial' topics today imo). Men's issues are already seen as trivial enough, they don't need to be trivialized further by lip service and lack of actual legal action. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/22 08:23 PM |
| 5 | Andrew Yang supports men and boys.https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/business-leaders-athletes-and-actors-join-push-for-u-s-marshall-plan-for-moms-proposal-1.5325869 I don't call advocating for policies that promote the feminist concept of "unpaid emotional labor" as support for men and boys. Simple statements talking about men falling behind and men having a "crisis" won't do. Where is the actual policy? I'd like to see what Andrew Yang's position on male only conscription and lack of funding for men's health at the st… | /r/MensRights | 27/01/22 08:19 PM |
| 26 | Andrew Yang shares thoughts about mens issues on Twitter.He also advocated for the discriminatory, traditionalist "Marshall Plan for Moms" that gives credence to the feminist idea of "unpaid labor" done by women. https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/coronavirus/business-leaders-athletes-and-actors-join-push-for-u-s-marshall-plan-for-moms-proposal-1.5325869 | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/01/22 07:52 PM |
| 9 | Andrew Yang shares thoughts about mens issues on Twitter.https://fee.org/articles/3-highlights-from-tyler-cowens-interview-with-jordan-peterson/ https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/jordan-peterson-and-tyler-cowen/ Tyler Cowen much like Jordan Peterson has a dismissive view of most men and fear mongers about them. https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2016/05/what-in-the-hell-is-going-on.html https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2016/07/what-are-young-men-doing.html I've noticed a strong traditionalist bent in many… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/01/22 07:45 PM |
| 2 | Help fund legal efforts by the NCFM to challenge discriminatory laws and policies against men. Please donate to the "Marc Angelucci Justice Fund". Your can specify your donation to go to this fund by writing that you want your donation to go to this fund in the "please leave your comments..." field.It is also of use to send the NCFM any emails concerning where you would like them to focus priorities in the future or where you'd like to see them branch out. Here is an email I sent them a while back (mid 2021) (at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])) (caution, it is quite lengthy): I want to personally thank you for continuing to keep up efforts against male sex selective conscription and men's rights issues as a whole despite demoralization tactics and defeatism spread by opponents of men… | /r/AntiFeminists | 27/01/22 06:36 AM |
| 1 | Help fund legal efforts by the NCFM to challenge discriminatory laws and policies against men. Please donate to the "Marc Angelucci Justice Fund". Your can specify your donation to go to this fund by writing that you want your donation to go to this fund in the "please leave your comments..." field.It is also of use to send the NCFM any emails concerning where you would like them to focus priorities in the future or where you'd like to see them branch out. Here is an email I sent them a while back (mid 2021) (at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])) (caution, it is quite lengthy): I want to personally thank you for continuing to keep up efforts against male sex selective conscription and men's rights issues as a whole despite demoralization tactics and defeatism spread by opponents of men… | /r/MensRights | 27/01/22 06:29 AM |
| 20 | This is a step in the right direction for gender equityThis is similar to the split seen on the issue of male only conscription: https://www.aclu.org/cases/national-coalition-men-et-al-v-selective-service-system-et-al On men's rights issues, traditionalists (both of the left wing and right wing (for examples of left wing traditionalists, see places like genzedong)) and social conservatives (religious or otherwise) have no regard for such issues and will work as much as they can to stop any progress from being made on such issues. If you want to see … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 27/01/22 05:32 AM |
| 2 | Help fund legal efforts by the NCFM to challenge discriminatory laws and policies against men. Please donate to the "Marc Angelucci Justice Fund". Your can specify your donation to go to this fund by writing that you want your donation to go to this fund in the "please leave your comments..." field.Copying and pasting a helpful comment I saw on the r/antifeminists sub: "Worth noting that Amazon has a thing called Amazon smile where they donate a percentage of your purchases to a charity of your choice. NCFM is on their list. Another way to slip some small donations their way without it actually costing you anything. You just have to remember to use smile.amazon.com instead of www.amazon.com, and to flip the option in the app." However if just the NCFM is specified using that option, the do… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/22 07:46 PM |
| 12 | I think things are starting to changeI've noticed this too. As much as there is talk of social media and the internet radicalizing young men, I think a similar process is more occurring for young women, especially in an environment where both misandry and insulting lip service and condescension towards men from tradcons dominates and the female equivalent of any male gender politics communities are allowed to remain up and are praised in mainstream journals while those same journals advocate that the male version of those communiti… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/01/22 03:51 AM |
| 16 | I think things are starting to changeAttitudes may change but the laws haven't. If anything more anti-male laws and policies are being upheld and putting forth https://archive.fo/7KUH6 https://archive.is/LRJff, https://archive.is/ylxbo, https://archive.fo/eJ1Js Duty to rescue and intervention policies applying to "able bodied men" now extend to even incidents like 'unruly' passengers on airplanes: https://archive.fo/j1bUZ Whether the laws are changing is the true measure of progress. Social attitudes can change very quickly back an… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/01/22 11:04 PM |
| 1 | Mention men, and you're instantly dismissedKeep speaking up and block and report those that harass you or send you waves of harassing messaging. Like and retweet other MRAs that are talking about this issue on social media to amplify your message and not seem like a lone voice crying out helplessly. Sharing infographics like the ones floating around about male versus female homicide rate in the UK are a good way to very quickly get your point across without having to tweet at anyone directly. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/01/22 10:45 PM |
| 24 | how to disentangle race and women’s issues for the common benefit?It needs to be pointed out that this isn't "wokeness", it is racebaiting by feminists as a thin cover for their own bigotry. Point out the origins of feminism being rooted in racism https://educationpost.org/the-suffragettes-were-not-allies-to-black-women-they-were-racist/ Point out how often feminists portray non white men by default as rapists and predators that don't "treat their women right" (you will find plenty of examples of this on feminist subs like femaledatingstrategy). Conservatives … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/01/22 10:42 PM |
| 1 | Is the men's rights movement becoming irrelevant?Which should be enough to convince any men's rights activist never to vote for or support conservative traditionalist political parties. If there was a key issue where they showed where they stood on men's rights and how they considered men's lives in comparison to women, that was it. No amount of them in the future "praising masculinity" (a meaningless gesture in itself) will ever undo that. They had their chance to prove differently, but now no men's rights activist should trust them. They a… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/01/22 10:38 PM |
| 2 | Is the men's rights movement becoming irrelevant?It was just more lip service, same whether in the Obama, Trump, or Biden admin. Men's rights activists should not be endorsing those that give lip service to men's rights but that don't follow through. They should make it official procedure not to endorse or claim progress is being made when no real legal or institutional action is taken. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/01/22 10:36 PM |
| 11 | Help fund legal efforts by the NCFM to challenge discriminatory laws and policies against men. Please donate to the "Marc Angelucci Justice Fund". Your can specify your donation to go to this fund by writing that you want your donation to go to this fund in the "please leave your comments..." field.The NCFM made news in the past few years (2019-2021) with its renewed effort to challenge male only conscription (which unfortunately was not successful because of mainly republican congress members such as Chip Roy (R-TX), Josh Hawley (R-TX), and James Inhofe (R-OK) and refusal to hear the case against male only conscription by liberal court justice Sotomayor https://archive.fo/DrEmi, https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-928.html However, whether it's disaster prepar… | /r/AntiFeminists | 25/01/22 07:23 AM |
| 6 | Help fund legal efforts by the NCFM to challenge discriminatory laws and policies against men. Please donate to the "Marc Angelucci Justice Fund". Your can specify your donation to go to this fund by writing that you want your donation to go to this fund in the "please leave your comments..." field.The NCFM made news in the past few years (2019-2021) with its renewed effort to challenge male only conscription (which unfortunately was not successful because of mainly republican congress members such as Chip Roy (R-TX), Josh Hawley (R-TX), and James Inhofe (R-OK) and refusal to hear the case against male only conscription by liberal court justice Sotomayor https://archive.fo/DrEmi, https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20-928.html However, whether it's disaster prepared… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 04:23 AM |
| 11 | Something I (as well as many others I assume) have noticed in the world.If laws didn't treat men as expendable, there would be far less prompting of anyone to make that rationalization. People that push for laws that treat men as expendable (such as the republicans that got the provision for gender neutral conscription dropped from the 2021 NDAA bill and liberal court justice Sotomayor who refused to hear the issue and sent it back to Congress to "deliberate") are trying to further a world where men are unquestionably treated this way. However, just remember that it… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/22 10:04 PM |
| 21 | Reddit Mods call all MRA's "Misogynist Terrorists" and then try to gaslight me by implying my lack of parental rights is only a "belief".That makes more sense then. How did you end up having an exchange with mods there in the first place? Did you comment on their sub and get banned and then asked why you were banned? Generally mods don't contact people (even from subs they don't like) to insult them if such people never posted on their sub or messaged them first. If it was the case that these messages followed after you engaging with them, it should be known that is not recommended to post on anti men's rights subs or message the… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/22 09:58 PM |
| 1 | I don't get how I'm supposed to believe women are oppressed when they receive this much love and support. Not a single disagreement in this front page reddit thread. Imagine anyone caring about you this much as a man.Another reason why that was the case is because social aspects of communism are more often than not just a left wing form of traditionalism enforced on men, no better than right wing forms of traditionalism enforced on men. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bMdd6apwyw | /r/MensRights | 24/01/22 09:55 PM |
| 1 | The ‘Blue Tax’Men pay more in taxes and get less tax credits (tax credit discrepancy still exists if income is equalized) This is also a problem when it comes to access to public assistance for struggling men. Women and only men with families are prioritized over single men. It is possibly one of the reasons why single men are very vulnerable to becoming homeless. Tax credits that prioritize women over men simply need to be done away with, and any politician that tries to propose legislation for more tax cred… | /r/MensRights | 24/01/22 09:44 PM |
| 43 | Reddit Mods call all MRA's "Misogynist Terrorists" and then try to gaslight me by implying my lack of parental rights is only a "belief".There are many mods on reddit. Which sub did messages from this mod come from? It would be specifically damning if this was a mod of a purportedly "neutral" or "non political" sub. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/22 09:37 PM |
| 19 | UK: Fury as AA says it does NOT 'prioritise' a lone woman over a man at roadside: Customers 'CANCEL memberships' as breakdown firm confirms it does not give priority 'based on gender'They caved https://archive.is/LRJff Therefore, men in the UK need to boycott and contact AA on their social media pages saying that they will not support or use the services of AA and will convince other men to do so as well. | /r/MensRights | 20/01/22 11:40 PM |
| 7 | COMPLETELY dismantling Samantha Lux’s lies about men’s rights.Why was this post removed? | /r/MensRights | 17/01/22 02:22 AM |
| 9 | There was a recent article being shared on r/science suggesting that large amounts of sexless men were due to "male dominated" gender ratios. This is an extension of the unfortunately often too repeated argument that there are "too many men". This blog post shows the misandry underlying this idea.The ideas and implications put forth in the recent research article by Brooks et al., 2022 are unfortunately repeated by a wide variety of people in today's world. That doesn't change that these ideas are profoundly misandrist and rooted in ideas of getting rid of "excess" men or at the very least seeing large populations of single males as a potential threat to be dealt with. It has remained largely unchallenged and allowed to go unopposed, much as the idea of male disposability/male expendabil… | /r/MensRights | 15/01/22 11:15 AM |
| 10 | Jesus, Tradcon Chip Roy said drafting men 30-50 is preferable than drafting womenHis term ends in 2023 and he is up for re-election later this year in early November. https://ballotpedia.org/Chip_Roy Everyone that is disgusted by his remarks that lives in his district (Texas 21st Congressional District https://ballotpedia.org/Texas%27_21st_Congressional_District) can show their disgust by voting against him by voting for one of his challengers. At the very least, challengers to Chip Roy have not said and worked towards such goals as much as he has. | /r/MensRights | 14/01/22 10:01 PM |
| 5 | Timely reminder: be careful of the recent trend of media and researchers pretending to care about men’s issuesYou're correct that this is not good press, and it needs to be corrected.However, all publicity is good publicity. The more people hear about us, the more people will check out what we stand for - regardless of the source they first heard from. Obviously positive publicity is most desirable, and those giving negative publicity need to be called out on their bigotry, but the more that bigots attempt to shove their bigotry down the throats of the people, the more people will turn away in disgust. … | /r/MensRights | 14/01/22 09:51 PM |
| 20 | Mitch Daniels champions male enrollment at Purdue, feminists in an uproarIs this related to this other post https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ryn5y3/thoughts_on_this_open_letter_from_purdue_the/ where the open letter by the Purdue president had said "How ironic if, after a half-century of historic, overdue progress integrating women fully into the nation’s economic, social and political life, we gave back the immense societal gains of that climb because men stopped holding up their end." There is nothing to praise here. This professor is as much demanding … | /r/MensRights | 14/01/22 11:17 AM |
| 8 | Timely reminder: be careful of the recent trend of media and researchers pretending to care about men’s issuesmost of the "male advocacy" that I see is just "Why do you spend your time playing vídeo games, not trying to have a gurfriend?" Everywhere in every male oriented hobby, activity or group that seems to be the end goal promoted, as if to promote the idea that men who don't meet this expectation ought to question their existence or are morally flawed/don't have their priorities in order. Arguably even the men's rights movement (MRM) is affected by this bias on relationship issues. With more men … | /r/MensRights | 14/01/22 09:13 AM |
| 10 | Timely reminder: be careful of the recent trend of media and researchers pretending to care about men’s issuesAh yes, Philip Zimbardo, one of the prominent figures to weigh in to previous conversations about men falling behind who, like many other before him, heaped shaming on any male pastimes that didn't include having a family or relationship with a woman https://www.ted.com/talks/zimchallenge/transcript?language=en https://archive.fo/IaX7Y Also who could forget William Bennett (https://archive.fo/8Wqjs) or Kay Hymowitz (https://archive.fo/NWt2p)? Traditionalists and social conservative minded people… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/22 08:50 AM |
| 19 | Timely reminder: be careful of the recent trend of media and researchers pretending to care about men’s issuesI am sharing a blog post that I think is important to keep in mind given the recent post in the science subreddit blaming "incels" on 'male dominated sex ratios' and articles about men falling behind and appeared to act "concerned" about this. When research or articles come out in the media talking about men's issues, this shouldn't be immediate cause for celebration. This blog post details why. There are many incentives for men's issues to be talked about more, but the consistent track record i… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/22 02:34 AM |
| 7 | ‘A Gentleman’s Guide’ To Fighting For Masculinity Amid Toxic FeminismWhat a joke The Federalist is pretending to be pro male after backing anti male laws like male only conscription and making articles dismissing the men's rights movement https://thefederalist.com/tag/drafting-women/ https://archive.is/RZgTH https://archive.fo/T7MRB Even the article is written in a way that blames men for any pastimes they have that don't involve relationships with women and criticizes the author of the (still traditionalist) book for making generalized statements about women (bu… | /r/MensRights | 10/01/22 08:22 AM |
| 2 | Has anyone noticed tradcons using the "incel" crisis lately as a way to advocate for going back to a abstinence-based society?Yes I understand the conservative party in the UK isn't as heavily focused on culture war issues as the republican party in the US, but if and when they do attempt to pander to men and praise men for a change or to contrast themselves with liberals, it's worth examining their policies and support for various issues before you consider them a better choice than other political parties. No matter which side, policy and laws supported and enacted are more consequential than rhetoric. If conservativ… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/01/22 03:54 AM |
| 1 | Has anyone noticed tradcons using the "incel" crisis lately as a way to advocate for going back to a abstinence-based society?I don't quite understand why it's more realistic to pursue a world that doesn't hate my allying with one group who hate me against another, than by pushing back against all hate regardless of who perpetuates it. Hate should be pushed back no matter which side perpetuates it, but the group that proposes more harmful policies towards men (specifically single men) is the group that should be pushed back on more. You can ignore (to an extent) cultural expectations without significant penalty, but yo… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/01/22 03:49 AM |
| 3 | Has anyone noticed tradcons using the "incel" crisis lately as a way to advocate for going back to a abstinence-based society?I don't really get the message from them that they have any real intention of winding back any clocks on the issues of traditional family values anyway, I don't think they particularly care all that much, as long as they get to do whatever they like. More or less a lot of conservative traditionalists view these social issues as a way to campaign on and get re-elected and use dateless men as battering rams against socially liberal policies. Much like immigration, they want to use this issue to st… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/01/22 02:10 AM |
| 0 | Has anyone noticed tradcons using the "incel" crisis lately as a way to advocate for going back to a abstinence-based society?I disagree. There is no benefit to picking and choosing which injustices are better or worse, and especially not if the only goal is to point to your political enemies and say "THEY're worse! Let's focus on beating THEM" Not on the basis of rhetoric alone but when you look at the policies traditionalists push versus what progressives as a whole push, traditionalists still come out with far more discriminatory policies against single, unmarried men. It wasn't until inter-sectionalist feminists ca… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/01/22 02:04 AM |
| 3 | Dr. Phil tells abuse victim that he isn't allowed to defend himself from his abuser and the audience cheersI just meant to say, the only thing relating mras and PUAs is the clear view that the women are wondeful effect is bullshit. There is nothing relating MRAs and PUAs (the manosphere type), it is just a fabrication meant to portray MRAs as sexually frustrated and having no real issues except dating and wanting to control women. It's also meant to trivialize men's concerns and PUAs like to join in on this because it gives them more attention. PUAs don't necessarily believe or disbelieve in the wome… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/22 11:23 PM |
| 2 | Has anyone noticed tradcons using the "incel" crisis lately as a way to advocate for going back to a abstinence-based society?We can hold the tradcons responsible for things like bachelor taxes and career caps on unmarried men This is arguably way more of a problem than some progressives engaging in campaigns fear mongering about men that are unable to get into a relationship with women. The higher tax rates for singles and career caps are formal and informal policies enforced by traditionalists. The shaming and excess attention towards dateless men is a social convention that has been unfortunately popularized with th… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/01/22 11:07 PM |
| 7 | Has anyone noticed tradcons using the "incel" crisis lately as a way to advocate for going back to a abstinence-based society?It's an attempt by conservatives to try and leverage the frustrations of dateless men as a way to gain votes and push a traditionalist agenda and to some lesser extent, a western imperialist and cultural hegemony agenda (the type Jordan Peterson sometimes alludes to when he talks about "saving western civilization"). Traditionalists have indicated in the past that they don't see men as whole unless they are married or in a relationship with a woman. They have lost on all other fronts in their … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/01/22 09:13 PM |
| 4 | Dr. Phil tells abuse victim that he isn't allowed to defend himself from his abuser and the audience cheersEh not a fan of PUAs but I see mras and PUAs related in one sense and one sense only. Both understand misandry and hypergamy, the PUAs are just blackpilled about it rather than redpilled. If PUAs were blackpilled they wouldn't be trying to sell false hope and would be defeatist or deterministic about it instead. PUAs however do try to push the idea that the any guy can be successful with women if they do certain lifestyle changes. Strictly speaking, that is more redpilled than anything else. Reg… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/22 09:06 PM |
| 3 | I realize now why being conservative and being up for men's rights are mutually exclusive: 2 words: the STATUS QUOAdditionally the Supreme Court refusing to hear the court case and punting this issue to Congress to "deliberate" was grossly irresponsible. In other countries, an issue that reaches the Supreme Court has to be ruled on and can't just be hand waved away or dismissed. The fact that the Supreme Court can decide which court cases to hear (even if the case makes it to the Supreme Court) played a part in the Supreme Court being able to punt this issue of male only conscription to Congress and further… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/01/22 12:03 AM |
| 3 | Is feminism a friend or an enemy of communism?Since Codepink (presumably an anti war organization) made no such effort at challenging male conscription, it's clear where they stand (although from their past statements and their name itself it's kind of evident). | /r/MensRights | 02/01/22 10:37 AM |
| 2 | Question for any lawyers in the USA: Since women in the draft is not happening via Congressional action ever it seems how do we resubmit the case NCFM v SSS back for a review in the Supreme Court?Obviously not. I had a feeling them signing on was mostly for decorative purposes. NCFM did most of the most work in even pushing this issue again. They are to be commended for their efforts, as most people were claiming such an effort would never make it to the Supreme Court. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/22 10:34 AM |
| 1 | Question for any lawyers in the USA: Since women in the draft is not happening via Congressional action ever it seems how do we resubmit the case NCFM v SSS back for a review in the Supreme Court?Which shows how little they regard men and the issues of men's rights. It couldn't have been any clearer. Nothing is ever going to change regarding this issue as long as feminists and tradcons keep getting elected and are in positions of power, as they do their best to block, re-direct or water down any proposals in fixing this issue, even when there isn't even majority opposition from the rest of the court or Congress. | /r/MensRights | 02/01/22 10:33 AM |
| 27 | The New Political Cry in South Korea: ‘Out With Man Haters’Archive: https://archive.fo/OqwI4 Article seems to condemn men for not being as chivalrous as older men: The backlash represents a split from previous generations.Older South Korean men acknowledge benefiting from a patriarchal culture that had marginalized women. Decades ago, when South Korea lacked everything from food to cash, sons were more likely to be enrolled in higher education. In some families, women were not allowed to eat from the same table as men and newly born girls were named … | /r/MensRights | 02/01/22 01:53 AM |
| 3 | The New Political Cry in South Korea: ‘Out With Man Haters’Archive: https://archive.fo/OqwI4 Article seems to condemn men for not being as chivalrous as older men: The backlash represents a split from previous generations.Older South Korean men acknowledge benefiting from a patriarchal culture that had marginalized women. Decades ago, when South Korea lacked everything from food to cash, sons were more likely to be enrolled in higher education. In some families, women were not allowed to eat from the same table as men and newly born girls were named … | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 11:53 PM |
| 3 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinityAs it stands the United States is still the greatest country on the planet , we should try to remind ourselves that and be grateful, would you rather live in the collective hive mind that is China, to be fair that would fuck feminist over but still no thanks lol This is irrelevant to the issue. This same sort of talk about men not getting married and being idle and turning to pornography instead could have happened in any country. In any situation this talk is used to chide men for not following… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 10:58 PM |
| 3 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinitythe right and the left the right is still easily way more helpful to mens general well-being as one big whole. All the right does is occasionally praising men that uphold traditionalist values. It's empty talk and does nothing. This is what the right really thinks of men's rights and how much regard they have for men versus women: https://archive.fo/T7MRB https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/a-conservative-victory-against-the-push-to-draft-women/ https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/ndaa-… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 10:53 PM |
| 4 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinity Once you get that big bank account you can be as selfish as you please until then you either would have to win the lottery or work hard, that’s fair. You are making something what I said into a personal issue rather than the issue at hand (which is the systematic issue of men being prodded (both socially and legally) to uphold traditional roles that disadvantage them). You also still haven't pointed out where I was "hating on the family unit". | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 07:46 PM |
| 4 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinity“When men are told to put family and society over their natural rights” Not natural rights, human rights. no offense that gives off a selfish kind of feminist vibe, your family and your country do matter, the world does not revolve around you. It's not a feminist vibe. Feminists are opposed to men not feeling pressured to live up to societal expectations and shame men that don't grow up as "manchildren". What's selfish is expecting men to live for others and tell them that the world doesn't revo… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 07:42 PM |
| 9 | Even the church has gone woke?Organized religion often pushes tradcon social values. It's not a bug but a feature. As part of these values, women are held in high regard and men are told to protect them as faithful and benevolent protectors. There is not emphasis on the other way around. That explains the one-sidedness of what you are seeing. This isn't by any means new or "woke". | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 07:09 PM |
| 6 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinityTell me where in the above post I was "hating on the family unit". Conservatives will complain about broken families but push for alimony and child support laws that make men that are unable to pay go to prison. They do all this in the name of "protecting children". https://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/gov-rick-scott-vetoes-controversial-alimony-bill/2273409/ They also push marriage which has disastrous results for men now if they get divorced. Men's rights isn't about "protecti… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 06:08 PM |
| 2 | Apparently, not pumping gas is ungentlemanly.Still haven't heard a major outcry about equal rights for Women being required to sign up for the draft at 18... Because when the issue went to congress traditionalists in the republican party blocked it by demanding that provision by struck out of the 2021 NDAA bill, just like they did blocking the requirement for women to sign up for selective service under the ERA in the 1980s. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 08:03 AM |
| 7 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinityYes, right is more in favor of men than left, but this favor is conditional.. They aren't, they are only in favor of men that are able to and want to get married. If a man gets divorced he is punished with alimony and is hit with higher taxes (tax breaks for married couples is something the right often pushes for). If a man becomes poor he is told to pull himself up by his bootstraps and not be a deadbeat. Besides that, republicans are heavy on keeping up the image of a married breadwinner with … | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 07:25 AM |
| 2 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinityFeminists and traditionalists in the republican party. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 07:17 AM |
| 3 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinityWow, it's almost like when literally every vector in which you interact with society treats you as a disposable piece of shit And to top it all off Hawley pushed for laws that treated men this way (male only conscription) to be kept the same. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 07:17 AM |
| 2 | Men's fascination with porn and games is on the rise due to criticism of masculinityHawley is one of the same politicians that pushed to keep male only conscription in place. Traditionalists want other men to suffer and sacrifice themselves so that they as traditionalists can feel "manly", that's their only principle. Traditionalism is antithetical to men's rights and traditionalists have always dismissed the idea of men having human rights instead of being expected to do something for society or the family. | /r/MensRights | 01/01/22 07:14 AM |
| 6 | I realize now why being conservative and being up for men's rights are mutually exclusive: 2 words: the STATUS QUOMen's rights activists in the US should also focus their efforts on making it so that elections are less restricted to only democrats and republicans (as unfortunately is often the case because of things like closed primaries), as it is obvious the 2 party system has been terrible for men's rights and other parties like the libertarian and green party (or a possible future social egalitarian party that's main platform is to disavow any form of identity politics entirely) are indirectly more prom… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/12/21 05:28 AM |
| 5 | The Reddit’s r/MGTOW Ban and What It Could Mean for Men’s Rights (A bit old but worth discussing)I admit ignorance about most of these subgroups, I've heard the terms MGTOW, redpill, blackpill, etc. but I'm not really sure how the sociology of those groups work. When I have had brief encounters with them I found that I generally didn't agree with their philosophies. Redpill and MGTOW are what is thought of as the manosphere. The term "incel" hurled around by feminists and people that want to shame certain men? The blackpillers are them, the rest is just false accusations and mislabeling of … | /r/MensRights | 30/12/21 10:52 PM |
| 9 | The Reddit’s r/MGTOW Ban and What It Could Mean for Men’s Rights (A bit old but worth discussing)I don’t think it means much for men’s rights, it’s more that it’s indicative of prevailing biases men’s rights has to face. This exactly. We know there is social media bias in favor of women but the banning of such a sub isn't really relevant to men's rights. MGTOW, redpillers and blackpillers don't have (and shouldn't have) anything to do with men's rights. MGTOW after all isn't a men's rights group and neither are the other groups. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/21 09:54 PM |
| 4 | I accidentally stumbled upon this subreddit.If you are interested in trying to stop them and other radical feminists, there is the Pink_Pill_Watch sub. Sorry your post got removed by the mods btw. It's strange that they'd approve it only to take it down a few hours later. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/21 09:01 AM |
| 3 | I accidentally stumbled upon this subreddit.If you are interested in such a sub to help with getting them taken down, there is the Pink_Pill_Watch sub. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/21 08:58 AM |
| 8 | Dr. Phil tells abuse victim that he isn't allowed to defend himself from his abuser and the audience cheersNot only is that dismaying but the reaction of men to such acts is arguably much more so. For example in the above video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d28usWdvmSg of the MRA, PUA and male feminist, most of the people in the audience and the male commenters are siding with the PUA and criticizing or mocking the MRA for taking double standards seriously and attacking his appearance or level of appeal to women. This will have to change if men as a whole are to ever make progress on social issue… | /r/MensRights | 29/12/21 12:11 AM |
| 5 | Congress punts decision on draft registration into 2022 or 2023Noise. The Democrats actually pulled the plug twice. It wasn't noise. Republicans like republican representative Chip Roy (R-TX) and republican senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) made a concerted effort to get the gender neutral draft provision dropped from the NDAA bill. They didn't just talk, they actively tried to get the provision dropped and bargain with other politicians to get this done. The democrats merely agreed to the proposal of dropping the provision because they wanted certain other propos… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 11:27 PM |
| 4 | Congress punts decision on draft registration into 2022 or 2023> As such it's only Republicans talking about this issue. Now among non-politicians you can find some feminists talking and they are saying they agree with the Republican position. Yes but that is true on any issue. Those people that agree however are voters, not politicians that have direct control over what provisions go into what bill and what laws to pass. Considering politicians, it was republican politicians that came out most vocally in favor of keeping male only conscription in place and… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 07:55 PM |
| 2 | Congress punts decision on draft registration into 2022 or 2023I know, they come up with whatever argument is convenient at the time. Their position isn't even consistent and deliberately so. They are the manifestation of society not caring about issues until there is a chance that women will be negatively affected by said issues. Also as someone pointed out on another sub it is a good idea to make conscription gender neutral before abolishing it, as if conscription is ever brought back, that will ensure there will be a struggle to change it to making it ma… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 07:45 PM |
| 5 | Congress punts decision on draft registration into 2022 or 2023Oh that is even more disgusting then. That goes beyond apathy and into direct malicious intent, reminiscent of tradcon arguments, specifically "women have more reasons not to register than men". | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 07:38 PM |
| 3 | Congress punts decision on draft registration into 2022 or 2023> I made a post about it a few weeks back where I went over a half dozen or so feminists that I found commenting about it and they all supported the so-called conservative position. 100%. Okay but were they politicians that were voting on this issue? In terms of the blame for this issue no doubt some can go to the liberal Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor, who made the decision to refuse to rule on this issue and politicize it by sending it to congress. > this characterization of the desire … | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 07:36 PM |
| 4 | Democrats have a man problem> Man, that's a whole lotta what-about-ism. Hardly. You tried to imply the right was better than the left and downplayed the discrimination against men by the right: "The left hates and despises men. They actively preach hate and push ruthless and prejudicial policies design to subjugate and ruin men. Ruin them in schools, professional life, in public life. Meanwhile, the right has old style benevolent sexism." "Neither is perfect, but the scale of the problem is totally different. Preaching hat… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 07:09 PM |
| 8 | Congress punts decision on draft registration into 2022 or 2023They are only saying "why don't we get rid of the draft for everyone?" when the possibility of the draft being made gender neutral is put up. Otherwise it's the arguments of "the draft hasn't been used since the 1970s", "we aren't in danger of having a draft anytime soon", "they'll probably never use the draft again". | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 07:01 PM |
| 3 | Congress punts decision on draft registration into 2022 or 2023They don't agree strongly enough with making selective service registration and conscription gender neutral but it hasn't been democratic politicians voicing support for keeping selective service registration and conscription male only. This lack of enthusiasm and effort in making conscription gender neutral or abolishing it altogether is indeed a problem, showing the problem with the 2 party system in America and the lack of regard both parties have for men's rights. But as far as vocal suppo… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 06:58 PM |
| 40 | Dr. Phil tells abuse victim that he isn't allowed to defend himself from his abuser and the audience cheersDr. Phil also had a segment "On Trial for Being Male" that tried to put men that had suffered false accusations on the same stage with an alleged "incel" that was mad at women and questioning their sexuality. http://menslaws.com/dr-phils-show-on-trial-for-being-male/ Nothing about daytime talk show or reality tv type shows has ever been pro male. There has always been an anti-male bias https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d28usWdvmSg The primary audience of such shows, just as with ads that bash men,… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 05:57 PM |
| 10 | Democrats have a man problem> The left hates and despises men. They actively preach hate and push ruthless and prejudicial policies design to subjugate and ruin men. Ruin them in schools, professional life, in public life. So does the right. They just pretend they don't. Their false concern shouldn't be acceptable to men, it's more insulting than outright demonizing them and letting men know where they stand. Let me know when there are politicians on the democratic side that are tweeting things like this: https://archive… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 04:22 PM |
| 20 | Democrats have a man problemRepublican strategists and conservative media outlets shouldn't pat themselves on the back too hard. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-short-lived-female-military-draft Congress has finally done something right. As lawmakers prepare to vote on new defense legislation this week, they dropped a proposal that would have required women to register for the military draft, according to two people familiar with the negotiations. The move to include women in the draft gained bipartisan supp… | /r/MensRights | 28/12/21 05:32 AM |
| 8 | Have you been watching porn, boys? Well, looks like the tradcons are going to label you a pedophile.They only pretend to "respect" men when those men have been used for their purposes. And even then it's lip service. | /r/MensRights | 26/12/21 02:03 AM |
| 5 | Conservative site celebrates women being excluded from the military draft saying “ A well-ordered society seeks to protect its women and children.”I just wondered if that was what they were alluding to rather than pretending like men can't have ptsd. They may or may not have been alluding to it but if they were making that specific argument, it's still an argument that shows where their motive lies in devaluing male lives and assumes that men can't be raped or tortured or that it is more inconsequential than it happening to a woman. I don't think they were pretending that men can't get PTSD but more so dismissing or downplaying trauma men … | /r/MensRights | 17/12/21 03:43 AM |
| 7 | Conservative site celebrates women being excluded from the military draft saying “ A well-ordered society seeks to protect its women and children.”This is still not a valid argument as male soldiers can still get raped and sexually abused, castrated and tortured. Suggesting that trauma should be a reason women should be protected but not men is a sexist argument that devalues the lives of men and privileges women. Either nobody should be put in that situation or the law has to be blind to gender. Otherwise men are being discriminated against. Also this issue of rape is no longer brought up in preventing women from being in active combat … | /r/MensRights | 17/12/21 03:28 AM |
| 6 | Conservative site celebrates women being excluded from the military draft saying “ A well-ordered society seeks to protect its women and children.”They had the votes if the 5 republicans hadn't insisted on stripping the provision from the NDAA bill. Conservative media outlets like the National Review are openly stating this. https://archive.ph/7G1bb So while democrats were not eager to do away with male only conscription, it's republicans that were most adamant in this approach. That's why people are blaming the republicans for this result. I have yet to see any democrats that openly voiced the idea that conscription should not be made g… | /r/MensRights | 17/12/21 03:21 AM |
| 7 | At what point in time do you think this whole woke culture emerged?Not to mention all the media that portrayed men and women as equal. Not true in the slightest. Please watch manwomanmyth videos about media bias and erasing male casualties and how the media reports more favorably about women than about men. It might be more apparent now but the bias was always there. A form of the bias was focusing on "women and children" or "women" in disasters. This practice continues to this day. It's not woke nor did it start from such, it's the empathy gap in action. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/21 06:42 PM |
| 3 | Conservative site celebrates women being excluded from the military draft saying “ A well-ordered society seeks to protect its women and children.”Men's right is just mostly defended is paid lip service to by the right | /r/MensRights | 16/12/21 06:09 PM |
| 7 | Conservative site celebrates women being excluded from the military draft saying “ A well-ordered society seeks to protect its women and children.”No, they fully support women being able to vote and voluntarily join the military https://archive.md/V9fBx I admire the strong, patriotic women who volunteer for military service. American women do not need to be conscripted to fight on the frontlines of war to prove their worth. The Selective Service System should not expand to include women. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rep-chip-roy-gop-ndaa-daughter-draft-removed-legislation.amp?__twitter_impression=true Roy thanked those women who have b… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/21 05:58 PM |
| 10 | Conservative site celebrates women being excluded from the military draft saying “ A well-ordered society seeks to protect its women and children.”“ Perhaps that’s because women believe their talents are better suited elsewhere. And in most cases, they are. It is just a fact that men are physically better equipped to handle the demands of combat duty. Men are also less likely to be seriously affected by trauma than women. But nowadays, it’s taboo even to mention differences between the two genders — or to even mention the two genders at all, for that matter. The lawmakers’ draft proposal was a case of “equity” gone wrong, and it’s a good t… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/21 05:43 PM |
| 62 | At what point in time do you think this whole woke culture emerged?It's not woke culture, it's feminism. Look up threads on ShitRedditSays from the early 2010s where they were already stalking men's rights subs (https://www.reddit.com/r/ShitRedditSays/search/?q=MRA&restrict_sr=1&sr_nsfw=). "MRA shitlord" was regularly used as an insult by them and they popularized the race-baiting "die cis white male scum" chants. The anti MRA stalking blog Manboobz/we hunted the mammoth started up in 2010. justneckbeardthings (made to mock socially awkward men that weren't f… | /r/MensRights | 16/12/21 05:13 PM |
| 3 | Does anyone know when we will get out of this “woke” phase?Dave "I'm Team TERF" Chappelle? https://nypost.com/2021/12/04/why-feminists-are-welcoming-dave-chappelle-to-teamterf/ How does this in any way help men? This is a prime example in fact of "anti woke" having nothing to do with men's rights and everything to do with emphasizing gender roles and traditionalism. The latter should not be the goal, as men's rights are always secondary or non existent in such a system. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/21 04:28 AM |
| 4 | Does anyone know when we will get out of this “woke” phase?This is the kind of policies republicans support, specifically the "anti-woke", anti "social justice" republican politicians. https://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/gov-rick-scott-vetoes-controversial-alimony-bill/2273409/ | /r/MensRights | 16/12/21 12:00 AM |
| -3 | Where's mgtow?Just forget about those communities, they are dead ends that rely on men not caring about their rights and instead trying to posture that they are getting back at the world. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/21 09:20 AM |
| 6 | When RP and others hang out now that their subreddits are gone?Just forget about those communities, they are dead ends that rely on men not caring about their rights and instead trying to posture that they are getting back at the world. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/21 09:19 AM |
| 56 | Does anyone know when we will get out of this “woke” phase?So I think it is safe to say that right now we are living in the weirdest times. Gender roles are considered sexist. Men being kept in their gender roles while women are free to step outside of theirs are one of the reasons why men are struggling. The opposite side of the coin of woke feminists (culture warriors in the rightwing) are using hysteria over "wokeness" to trap you into vote for policies that put you in roles advantageous to their traditionalist vision of the future where men sacrific… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/21 09:13 AM |
| 13 | The University of Minnesota’s Unlawful DiscriminationFuck the lip service by the National Review. Forget that anti-male publication. https://archive.md/WhV5p https://archive.md/99giM https://archive.md/0TqgQ https://archive.md/0X0es https://archive.md/7G1bb | /r/MensRights | 13/12/21 07:39 PM |
| 2 | Men's advocacy tend to have higher quality contents than feminism, yet we are still viewed as the assholes fringe movement. Does anyone ever wonder why?Woke culture has also allowed conservative traditionalists to hijack men's rights talking points and serve as fake counter culture opposition, while supporting inequality under the guise that supporting equality under the law is the same as being a "woke SJW". Conservatives did this recently with advocating against the NDAA provision that required women to sign up for conscription like men have to, calling it "woke", "social justice" and "social engineering". | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/12/21 11:32 PM |
| 3 | Men's advocacy tend to have higher quality contents than feminism, yet we are still viewed as the assholes fringe movement. Does anyone ever wonder why?In addition to the social bias against men and in favor of women, there is also the fact that many feminist messages are brief, easily memorable and repeatable and aren't as long as a few paragraphs of text. Some of this is because "the medium is the message". A lot of men's rights activism takes place online, where it is increasingly frowned on to evaluate upon issues in even short paragraphs of text or "spamming" links of supporting evidence (parenthetical or otherwise). There aren't many quic… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/12/21 11:23 PM |
| 5 | This quote from Senator Josh Hawley on possibly expanding the military draft to include women should make you disgusted and angered since everything he says here can apply to men as well, ye he said he was fine with keeping the draft male onlyIt was mainly conservatives that voiced vocal support for the outcome of keeping conscription male only. Democrats weren't as vocal as supporting this (or at least there weren't an clear examples of politicians or partisan liberal media outlets that cheered on keeping male only conscription - while the same can't be said for conservative politicians and partisan conservative media outlets). Even democrats in more conservative states like Missouri didn't display vocal support for this outcome. … | /r/MensRights | 11/12/21 10:45 PM |
| 7 | This quote from Senator Josh Hawley on possibly expanding the military draft to include women should make you disgusted and angered since everything he says here can apply to men as well, ye he said he was fine with keeping the draft male onlyI don't disagree but for people that do not like this decision who live in Missouri, the most effective course of action at this point is to vote for someone (any one candidate of your choice, preferably not a social conservative) other than Josh Hawley when he next runs for re-election. Clearly from how much vocal support there was from many conservatives for keeping selective service registration and conscription limited to men only, men's rights activists are taking a gamble if they vote for … | /r/MensRights | 11/12/21 05:04 AM |
| 36 | This quote from Senator Josh Hawley on possibly expanding the military draft to include women should make you disgusted and angered since everything he says here can apply to men as well, ye he said he was fine with keeping the draft male onlyHe will next be running for re-election in 2025 https://ballotpedia.org/Josh\_Hawley. Men's rights activists in Missouri that are appalled by this decision should remember this and vote accordingly for one of Hawley's challengers. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/21 02:01 AM |
| 3 | Chip Roy - “The American people have been speaking up and letting people know they don’t want their 18 year-old daughters to be drafted” but drafting sons is oK Chip?To men's rights activists in Texas that live in the congressional district represented by Chip Roy: Chip Roy will next be up for re-election in 2023 https://ballotpedia.org/Chip_Roy He represents the 21st congressional district in Texas. https://ballotpedia.org/Texas%27\_21st\_Congressional\_District It is not yet known who he will be running against, but to show your disapproval with his statements, you can vote for one of the candidates running against him when he is next up for re-election. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/21 11:11 PM |
| 5 | Proposal- the creation of political party for male issues in the United States.Agreed, but I think a grassroots style or Political Action Committee would be helpful too. The two party system is very entrenched in the US. For this, I would suggest that people that are interested in men's rights activism to continue to raise awareness about men's issues and the disinformation and lip service paid to them, and in the meantime become richer and get into a more substantial position of influence before they start such organizations. Aside from everything else, what you need in t… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/12/21 10:01 PM |
| 9 | Proposal- the creation of political party for male issues in the United States.Agreed, but I think a grassroots style or Political Action Committee would be helpful too. The two party system is very entrenched in the US. For this, I would suggest that people that are interested in men's rights activism to continue to raise awareness about men's issues and the disinformation and lip service paid to them, and in the meantime become richer and get into a more substantial position of influence before they start such organizations. Aside from everything else, what you need in t… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/21 09:59 PM |
| 1 | Victims of shellshock, post WW1. Yet another male 'privileged' ignored in dialogue of historical privilege/oppressionNot a privilege for us, but it's definitely seen as a privilege for men to prove their "masculinity" by conservatives that voted to keep conscription male only by stripping the gender neutral conscription proposal in the NDAA bill. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/21 05:59 AM |
| 2 | Defense bill will not require women to sign up for draft after allAll men born male at birth have to sign up for selective service when they turn 18 or they don't have access to financial aid like FAFSA and aren't allowed jobs in the government. In some states, men need to sign up if they want to be able to get a driver's license and register to vote. They can also be fined up to $250,000 and imprisoned up to five years for failing to register, although cases of this happening are kind of rare and such penalties are not strictly enforced, which is another reas… | /r/MensRights | 08/12/21 03:42 AM |
| 3 | r/misandryfetishYeah? Well here is the report link: link | /r/MensRights | 08/12/21 03:31 AM |
| 23 | Lawmakers drop proposal to add women to the draftWhat men's rights advocates need to do going forward: Find out which politicians voiced support for keeping selective service registration and conscription male only and vote against those politicians if you live in a district that they are running in by voting for anyone of their challengers (preferably from the opposite party given conservatives were the biggest supporters of to selective service registration and conscription male only). Stop falling for culture wars and empty appeals from rep… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/12/21 03:23 AM |
| 36 | Lawmakers drop proposal to add women to the draftWhat MRAs need to do going forward: Find out which politicians voiced support for keeping selective service registration and conscription male only and vote against those politicians if you live in a district that they are running in. Stop falling for culture wars and empty appeals from republicans and conservatives talking about the "woke", "politically correct" and "feminist agenda" when they back anti-male policies and move at all costs to protect women while saddling men with all the obligat… | /r/MensRights | 07/12/21 03:20 AM |
| 10 | Josh Hawley and the Republican Obsession With Manliness [NYT op-ed]The same Josh Hawley that supports male only conscription (https://archive.md/0VL4L) and attacks any pastimes of men that result in them being "idle" and not pandering to women (https://archive.md/jumLS). The idea that he is pro male is a sickening lie. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 07/12/21 12:25 AM |
| 3 | Justin Waters who is running for the 3rd congressional district in Florida considers you as a man to be expendable. Let the people here that live in that district show him that we disagree by voting for his challengerIn case you thought this remark by him was eugenicist and thought it's something someone on the alt-right would say: Justin Waters tagged Steve Sailor in his second tweet talking about how he got ratioed by MRAs and asked him what he thought. Steve Sailor is a paleoconservative that has published articles in white nationalist outlets like VDARE: https://www.pinkerite.com/2019/12/the-racist-logic-of-steve-sailer.html Steve Sailor was also a columnist for taki magazine, a right wing libertarian ou… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/12/21 11:03 PM |
| 4 | Justin Waters who is running for the 3rd congressional district in Florida considers you as a man to be expendable. Let the people here that live in that district show him that we disagree by voting for his challengerIt's not even an exaggeration that such rhetoric like this comes from the alt-right. Justin Waters tagged Steve Sailor in his second tweet talking about how he got ratioed by MRAs and asked him what he thought. Steve Sailor is a paleoconservative that has published articles in white nationalist outlets like VDARE: https://www.pinkerite.com/2019/12/the-racist-logic-of-steve-sailer.html Steve Sailor was also a columnist for taki magazine, a right wing libertarian outlet that has featured others … | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 10:47 PM |
| 5 | Justin Waters who is running for the 3rd congressional district in Florida considers you as a man to be expendable. Let the people here that live in that district show him that we disagree by voting for his challengerJustin Waters has cowardly deleted his tweet response to someone in which he emptily thanked them for their service but repeated that "men are expendable": https://mobile.twitter.com/Wsingleton1974/status/1466864064995463170 Luckily a lot of his previous tweets (where he doubles down) have been archived in case he decides to delete them later too. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 09:35 PM |
| 3 | Justin Waters who is running for the 3rd congressional district in Florida considers you as a man to be expendable. Let the people here that live in that district show him that we disagree by voting for his challengerJustin Waters has cowardly deleted his tweet response to someone in which he emptily thanked them for their service but repeated that "men are expendable": https://mobile.twitter.com/Wsingleton1974/status/1466864064995463170 Luckily a lot of his previous tweets (where he doubles down) have been archived in case he decides to delete them later too. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/12/21 09:34 PM |
| 1 | "Men are MEANT to be expendable. Women are not." J Walters for Congress on TwitterThen men's rights activists need to double down and make sure that if they live in the district he is running in, they vote for any other candidate of their choice rather than him. None of the other candidates have been as shameless as to make multiple tweets about how "men are expendable" and how "war is a man's game". This person running for congress even replied to someone that objected to this by thanking him for his service but then repeating that "men are expendable" https://ballotpedia.or… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 09:12 PM |
| 1 | "Men are MEANT to be expendable. Women are not." J Walters for Congress on TwitterAlso anyone that lives in the district he is running in should vote against him. There is no use in just voicing disapproval if you don't make this an electoral issue. He certainly is and appears to even be trying to run on this platform of how he considers that "men are expendable". https://ballotpedia.org/Justin\_Waters https://ballotpedia.org/Florida%27s\_3rd\_Congressional\_District His challengers on the democratic side are: Danielle Hawk His challengers on the republican side are: Kat Camm… | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 09:09 PM |
| 1 | "Men are MEANT to be expendable. Women are not." J Walters for Congress on TwitterIf you live in the district he is running in and disagree with him, the surest way to show your disapproval is to vote for literally any one of the other candidates running against him https://ballotpedia.org/Justin_Waters https://ballotpedia.org/Florida%27s\_3rd\_Congressional\_District His challengers on the democratic side are: Danielle Hawk His challengers on the republican side are: Kat Cammack Manuel Asensio | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 09:07 PM |
| 2 | "Men are MEANT to be expendable. Women are not." J Walters for Congress on TwitterHe is running for congress in the 3rd congressional district of Florida If you live in this district, it would help to keep him out of office by voting for literally one of any other of the candidates that are running against him. https://ballotpedia.org/Justin_Waters https://ballotpedia.org/Florida%27s_3rd_Congressional_District His challengers on the democratic side are: Danielle Hawk His challengers on the republican side are: Kat Cammack Manuel Asensio | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 09:04 PM |
| 3 | "Men are MEANT to be expendable. Women are not." J Walters for Congress on TwitterHere are the candidates currently running against him: https://ballotpedia.org/Florida%27s_3rd_Congressional_District His challengers on the democratic side are: Danielle Hawk His challengers on the republican side are: Kat Cammack Manuel Asensio | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 08:59 PM |
| 3 | "Men are MEANT to be expendable. Women are not." J Walters for Congress on TwitterKat Cammack (R-FL) Manuel Asensio (R-FL) https://ballotpedia.org/Justin\_Waters | /r/MensRights | 06/12/21 08:58 PM |
| 3 | Justin Waters who is running for the 3rd congressional district in Florida considers you as a man to be expendable. Let the people here that live in that district show him that we disagree by voting for his challengerEven in more liberal states like New York, there are politicians that support discriminatory male only conscription like Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-22) https://romesentinel.com/stories/tenney-backs-womens-choice-in-service-act,122834 So while this issue of anti-male tradcon politicians is more visible in more conservative states, moving away won't necessarily mean you are moving away from the anti-male tradcon politicians. So far it's mostly republicans supporting male only conscription for the sake… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/12/21 08:45 PM |
| 3 | To those that claim men are expendable and don't deserve basic human rights.There are some actions we can take electorally, at least for men's rights activists that live in the congressional district that he is running in. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/r95thx/justin\_waters\_who\_is\_running\_for\_the\_3rd/ | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 08:01 PM |
| 2 | Man running for Congress says men are the ones “meant to be expendable”I found the link: https://ballotpedia.org/Justin_Waters Justin Waters is running for the third congressional district in Florida. His challengers on the democratic side are: Danielle Hawk (D-FL) His challengers on the republican side are: Kat Cammack (R-FL) Manuel Asensio (R-FL) Saying and campaigning on the platform of "men being expendable" is a case where honesty is not the best policy. Men's rights activists that live in Florida: vote for any other of these candidates but do NOT vo… | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 02:36 AM |
| 2 | Man running for Congress says men are the ones “meant to be expendable”He literally tweets "war is a man's game" using the same feminist argument that "men start all the wars so they should have to fight them". If he's really going to run on this issue, men in Florida need to know who he is running against so they can throw their support behind his challenger. This guy doesn't deserve to be anywhere in congress. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 02:26 AM |
| 5 | Thailand's Male Only Conscription - Physical, Mental and Sexual Torture of young men.And despite this some "researchers" have the nerve to claim that men in East Asia opposing male only conscription is related to male victimhood and incel violence. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/icpvtr/incels-and-terrorism-sexual-deprivation-as-security-threat/ Such narratives are already visible in online communities. A case in point in Singapore is the dissatisfaction of losing girls to white immigrants. Others take on a slightly different but equally misogynistic flavour, such as th… | /r/MensRights | 05/12/21 12:20 AM |
| 37 | America Has A Boy CrisisNo, this seems more like more lip service. It's more subtle than other tradcon lip service but still there when you read between the lines: There’s a Lack of Good Male Role ModelsAnother problem for our boys: the lack of strong, male role models. A boy needs a man to teach him how to be a man. More and more often, boys are growing up without a father in the home to help guide him into adulthood. Then he goes to school where, more and more often, there aren’t male role models there either. Only 1… | /r/MensRights | 04/12/21 06:06 PM |
| 4 | Man running for Congress says men are the ones “meant to be expendable”I'm saying it would be a good idea not to host the screenshot on imgur next time. Try another site like imgbb Such comments on the imgur post are made to discredit any complaints MRAs have. It's disgusting that they are focusing more on the bad wording of the tweets in response to the politician instead of the politician running for office saying that men should be expendable. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/21 11:09 PM |
| 4 | Man running for Congress says men are the ones “meant to be expendable”It won't work that way, transgender women still have to sign up for selective service and are not exempt just because they decided to identify as another gender. Only getting rid of conscription or making it gender neutral will stop the discrimination against men in this area. | /r/MensRights | 03/12/21 10:45 PM |
| 2 | Man running for Congress says men are the ones “meant to be expendable”How is that a bomb? The majority of the commenters on imgur seem to be taking issue with the wording of the person that responded to the politician and the hypothetical of women being mandated to give child birth above the real possibility of only men being drafted, confusing twitter responses for reddit. If you posted that screenshot to gather support for such screenshotted comments I'd recommend some other site than imgur. Imgur is full of feminists that obviously don't care about men. And t… | /r/MensRights | 03/12/21 10:41 PM |
| 5 | Should We Have Sons? If So How The Heck Do We Raise Them?No, you are right to lean toward the "no son" route as an ethical practice. Bringing a son into this world as opposed to a daughter means your child faces far more risk of: violence, homelessness, poverty, bullying, being locked up in prison or convicted of a crime, trouble keeping a job, and loneliness - just to name a few factors. Then throw in how misandry in the world doesn't seem to be lessening (just the opposite in fact), the fact that women are treated more leniency than men in any socia… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/11/21 04:04 PM |
| 14 | What do y’all think about the whole “weaponized incompetence” thing?It's more signs of how social media is very encouraging of anti male attitudes and legitimizing such concepts. It shows how social media (including a lot of reddit, as seen by their double standards in allowing radical feminist subs to remain up) is often a misandrist echo chamber that encourages degradation of anyone male to get more market share and use among women, much as misandrist tv ads have encouraged degradation of anyone male to sell a product to their a mostly female audience. You c… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/11/21 02:36 PM |
| 3 | YouTube censorship of MRAs is really getting out of hand now. In comment below I put more info about feminist' censorship and tips how to get around it.Tips to get around feminist censorship on youtube: type shadowbanned or censored words in mixed alphanumeric characters "wom3n" "f3m1n1sm" include spaces between letters "w0m 3n" It is shameful that it has come to this, but this shows what happens when feminists are in charge (the current CEO of youtube is a feminist https://yourstory.com/2017/03/susan-wojcicki-diversity/amp/). | /r/MensRights | 17/11/21 12:49 PM |
| 3 | YouTube censorship of MRAs is really getting out of hand now. In comment below I put more info about feminist' censorship and tips how to get around it.Agreed, u/rMensRights u/AnnArchist u/AloysiusC u/typhonblue u/mensmod u/goodmod u/iainmf u/nicemod u/genobeam why was this thread deleted? | /r/MensRights | 17/11/21 12:42 PM |
| 1 | YouTube censorship of MRAs is really getting out of hand now. In comment below I put more info about feminist' censorship and tips how to get around it.It's also probably context specific, meaning that any man (or account suspected of belonging to a male) on anti-feminist channels is censored and shadowbanned but any woman (or any account suspected of belonging to a female) that posts the same thing has more leniency. | /r/MensRights | 17/11/21 12:41 PM |
| 7 | Serious: be careful of the recent trend of media pretending to care about men's issuesI don't have to prove anything to you. YOU are the one that is trying to hijack this discussion and focus on one point in the original post and make it all about women. You have also trolled this sub quite recently. You aren't here in good faith. | /r/MensRights | 16/11/21 02:05 PM |
| 5 | Serious: be careful of the recent trend of media pretending to care about men's issues> I suspect you were inspired by it, but there was a discussion here recently of an article that was basically: "Men lonely. Women most affected." Which is usually how all these articles will go; something bad is happening to men, how does that hurt women? It was more the posts about the media feigning concern about young men falling behind in college such as this one https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qtg3oe/gender_gap_in_colleges_growing_colleges_enroll_6/ The Wall Street Journal a… | /r/MensRights | 16/11/21 01:55 PM |
| 1 | Gender gap in colleges growing; Colleges enroll 6 women for every 4 men.From the same outlet that gleefully talked about the "End of Men" https://archive.md/CrAxH Please archive next time OP. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/21 10:19 PM |
| 3 | Message to feminists on International Men’s Day 2021If I see anything like this on that day, I will lose my fucking mind and I’m gonna make sure everyone sees that you are the problem and you are the oppressors. When one day there are legal consequences for their denigration of males like there are for the opposite sex, that is the day your words will carry full weight. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/21 07:53 PM |
| 9 | Male loneliness mocked on SNL's Man Park Sketch as women take their men to a park to meet other men.There was also another skit recently on SNL making fun of male virgins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21Ki96Lsxhc The recent timing of both of these events seems like a form of baiting vulnerable men for attention. A lot of media has been doing this and it's one of the reasons why the credibility and seriousness of the media is no longer as much as it used to be. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/21 07:52 PM |
| 3 | Dua Lipa - Boys will be BoysMy point is that this song is really about men she hooks up with or makes advances on her, but is pretending to be about all men to cause outrage and needless controversy. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/21 08:08 AM |
| 0 | Dua Lipa - Boys will be BoysTo be quite blunt, as much as this is sexist, she probably is talking about the men she hooks up with or that make advances on her, not the average man. That's what the average song in that genre is about anyway. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/21 12:12 AM |
| 2 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?Sure, I would look forward to that. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 03:00 AM |
| 2 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?Consider making posting the links on the +MensRights guild too just so that there is another easily accessible copy. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:56 AM |
| 2 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?Fiebert, Martin S. (2011; last updated June 2012.). References Examining Assaults by Women on Their Spouses or Male Partners: An Annotated Bibliography. Thank you. Are there any others? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:55 AM |
| 2 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?Thank you so much. Please take your time. I will be sure to pass on the information to other people I know that are interested in men's rights so that these links aren't easily lost. I recommend archiving any future men's rights information subs (through archive.is) if you make such communities in the future so that the information on those subs isn't lost if they are banned. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:47 AM |
| 2 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?No matter what the case, another completely neutral sub like r/misandry that was going to be a hub for men's rights information got banned for false reasons, which deserves to be pointed out. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:46 AM |
| 2 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?Sure thing. Were there more links you could find regarding other men's rights issues (circumcision, conscription, child custody, alimony, child support, etc.)? | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:36 AM |
| 2 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?Yes, please provide any of the links on the sub that you still had access to. I think the sub was a good source of information. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:34 AM |
| 2 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?And so far my sub r/mensrightsfacts hasn't been done in like that either, though mine is fairly new and will basically be focused on men's rights facts. It has now. Do you have backup links and archives to what was on that sub? It served as a good repository for information and quick links regarding men's rights issues. Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:27 AM |
| 1 | What’s Up w/Reddit’s Hate on Men?r/misandry and r/mensrightsfacts are banned too (the first after someone that was pro male was able to get mod position on that sub and try to document misandry instead of minimizing or making light of it). Both subs were banned for "ban evasion" even though they have nothing to do with promoting MGTOW. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:26 AM |
| 1 | So remember how /r/misandry was being squatted on by sexists who denied misandry exists?Same thing happened to r/mensrightsfacts recently and the sub was quietly banned while people weren't really paying attention. This sets a bad precedent for future mass bannings of men's rights subs in the future. The sub was as neutral as one could get and mostly featured links to discussions about men's rights issues. Does anyone have links to archives or backups of the posts there? I can't find any and that sub was a good source for information regarding men's rights issues. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:23 AM |
| 1 | So remember how /r/misandry was being squatted on by sexists who denied misandry exists?Same fate befell r/mensrightsfacts recently. This sets a bad precedent for future mass bannings of men's rights subs in the future. The sub was as neutral as one could get and mostly featured links to discussions about men's rights issues. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/21 02:21 AM |
| 1 | R.I.P. to the new r/Misandry (2021-2021)Does anyone have an archive of posts on the r/mensrightsfacts sub? It was also recently banned for the same spurious "ban evasion" claims and I haven't found any archives. | /r/EverydayMisandry | 31/08/21 02:19 AM |
| 1 | /r/misandry has been banned.get rich get powerful people on your side somehow get good lawyers then sue these companies | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/08/21 02:17 AM |
| 1 | /r/misandry has been banned.They did the same to r/mensrightsfacts recently. I think this sets a precedent for more men's rights subs to be unfairly banned in the future. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/08/21 02:17 AM |
| 1 | /r/misandry has been banned.r/mensrightsfacts was banned also recently for the same claim of it being a "ban evasion" sub, even though there was nothing MGTOW related there and the sub was about providing links to issues detailing men's rights. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/08/21 02:16 AM |
| 1 | /r/misandry has been banned.The same thing recently happened to r/mensrightsfacts. Does anyone know what links were posted on that sub? I remember there were a lot of links and the sub served as a centralized source of quick links detailing men's rights issues. Thanks. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/08/21 02:15 AM |
| 2 | An announcement regarding r/misandry and r/mgtowIt again seems like another men's rights sub has been unfairly banned just like r/misandry was. This time the sub is r/mensrightsfacts. The stated reason is of course ban evasion "This subreddit was banned due to a violation of Reddit’s content policy against creating or repurposing a sub to reconstitute or serve the same objective as a previously banned or quarantined subreddit." - even though the mensrightsfacts sub had to do with providing a repository of topics regarding men's rights issue… | /r/EverydayMisandry | 31/08/21 02:12 AM |
| 1 | /r/misandry has been banned.r/mensrightsfacts was also banned recently for the claim of ban evasion. It was a good repository for men's rights information. Do you know if the links there were archived? I can't find any available archives of that sub. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/08/21 02:11 AM |
| 1 | /r/misandry has been banned.The same thing occurred with r/mensrightsfacts recently. The stated reason is of course ban evasion "This subreddit was banned due to a violation of Reddit’s content policy against creating or repurposing a sub to reconstitute or serve the same objective as a previously banned or quarantined subreddit." - even though the mensrightsfacts sub had to do with providing a repository of topics regarding men's rights issues and not promotion of or a space for MGTOW discussion. Does anyone have any back… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 31/08/21 02:09 AM |
| 1 | Can we talk about how normalized sexism against men has become lately?The best option for anyone to do right now is to support men's rights organizations like the NCFM in their continuing struggle to advance equality protection under the law for men and apply for modding positions on social media so that feminist power mods have less of a monopoly on moderation of discussions. Focus on relationships and coming together is a distraction and mired in culture wars. It's focusing on helping ensure equality under the law for men and representation of less anti men's ri… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/21 12:34 AM |
| 1 | Can we talk about how normalized sexism against men has become lately?I am an avid Masculinist! I am Pro Male! and I am for Male Empowerment! Masculinist and masculinism are loaded terms that will cause others to demand that you live up to conventionally masculine ideals. Pro male and pro male empowerment are better descriptions. | /r/MensRights | 24/08/21 03:29 AM |
| 1 | Graphic being circulated on twitter tendatiously placing MRA's on a scale with 'black pill incels'They have overlap. FDS is all about making fun of ugly unattractive men, including virgin men. That means they spend a lot of the time making fun of incels to even though they claim to be a "dating" sub (which is just a guise for shitting on men they don't like). Many posters on the FDS sub are pinkpillers and use the same terms like "scrote" and "moid" | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 10:37 PM |
| 2 | Can we talk about how normalized sexism against men has become lately?More men are killing themselves than killing others. For every man that kills others (often including other men BTW and not just women, as was even the case with Jake Davison and Elliot Rodger) there are thousands of men that silently kill themselves. Allow suffering men an easy painless way to kill themselves like euthanasia and you'd see even more how large the suicide rate would surpass the murder rate for such men. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 08:42 AM |
| 5 | Can we talk about how normalized sexism against men has become lately?Men are suffering and all you can think of is whether women will be okay. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 08:09 AM |
| 25 | QuestionSocial media more generally speaking. But it spills over into real life. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 07:09 AM |
| 3 | Can we talk about how normalized sexism against men has become lately?Feminist power mods have taken over formerly neutral subs like unpopular opinion and even the sports sub and used it to promote their agenda. Same with places like AskMen. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 07:07 AM |
| 2 | Graphic being circulated on twitter tendatiously placing MRA's on a scale with 'black pill incels'One of the mods on the radical feminist sub femaledatingstrategy used to identify with the bluepill label and post on r/purplepilldebate and r/thebluepill but was more misandrist than even many people on those subs. For feminism and the bluepill I'd say it goes like this TwoXChromosomes/TrollXChrosomes/twitter -> femaledatingstrategy and anti-incel mocking subs -> trufemcels, vindicta and pinkpill feminism | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 07:05 AM |
| 1 | Reddit, why you so misandrist? Tired of being downvoted for calling out misandry.Wrong. Misandry is popular because it is accepted by most people, deliberately overlooked or justified on social media and promoted in entertainment media. Other areas of the world like South Korea and China are having the same issue as in western countries with the rise of radical feminism. Many people on the radical feminist femcel and pinkpill communities are from countries outside of the west. This is a global problem. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 07:02 AM |
| 1 | Graphic being circulated on twitter tendatiously placing MRA's on a scale with 'black pill incels'Completely inaccurate graph. Pick up artists have always viewed men's rights activism as lame and an impediment to attracting women. People that are interested in pick up artistry aren't interested in men's rights outside of dating and relationships. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 06:57 AM |
| 1 | Feminists treat men badly. It’s bad for feminism.Damage control by the washington post https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-cant-we-hate-men/2018/06/08/f1a3a8e0-6451-11e8-a69c-b944de66d9e7\_story.html | /r/EverydayMisandry | 23/08/21 06:54 AM |
| 4 | Can we talk about how normalized sexism against men has become lately?it's just more important to fight for real mens issues like suicide, homelessness, early mortality etc. You won't even be able to talk about that in a context outside of feminist theory and victim blaming men without getting your spaces shut down at some point. So no, it's important to confront radical feminism. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 06:50 AM |
| 2 | Can we talk about how normalized sexism against men has become lately?That excuse is never acceptable when it's a man that has bitterness about being single or treated badly by others so it's not at all an acceptable excuse. And chalking it up to personal issues is downplaying systematic sexism and radicalization of women against men. | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 06:49 AM |
| 2 | Can we talk about how normalized sexism against men has become lately?You need to ban the feminists before they ban you | /r/MensRights | 23/08/21 06:47 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter