TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwaway2676 Archive

View 0 posts and 38 comments by throwaway2676 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

You know, I'm almost glad visible feminists like her make obscenely vile statements like that -- makes it much easier to debunk claims of "those aren't real feminists!"
/r/MensRights25/08/15 12:08 AM
2

That right there is why women comprise 54% of the electorate and (thus) why politicians don't give a shit about men. It only takes 2 to be better than my vote. Not that 2 matters at all, either. And what about the sum of the votes of all people who ever engaged in this type of discussion? If you can be swayed to vote, everyone can. All it takes is for people to stop viewing their decisions as made in a vacuum.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 05:45 AM
0

That right there is why women comprise 54% of the electorate and (thus) why politicians don't give a shit about men. People like you ensure this movement won't get anywhere.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 05:41 AM
3

Do we need to start submitting patent applications for our fucking sperm now? That...is something I seriously want to try now.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:53 PM
12

A couple relevant studies to provide some context: 1) Study chalks boys' lower grades up to conduct. 2) Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys' failing grades.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 08:34 PM
110

That's when you're supposed to hand her the check and say, "Didn't you hear? Feminism has won! We get to split this now!" I never just straight up pay for a meal unless I know she will cover the next one or something.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 06:37 PM
4

Interestingly, IQ tests are now literally designed to give equal or near-equal averages between sexes. As a result, the mental rotation task and other spatially-heavy items have been altogether removed from most IQ tests. These days, we can only test intelligence to the extent that it isn't too politically incorrect.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:54 PM
3

Einstein was never tested. The 165 number was literally made up and spread to make him feel more "accessible" (that is, "with hard work, you can do that too!") Estimations based on his work and early proficiency have put him at 200+.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:48 PM
6

For context, here are the men's world records, and here are the women's. Squat: Class Male Lift Female Lift 123 639 369 132 551 391 148 556 450 165 610 440 181 672 473 198 750 468 Bench Press: Class Male Lift Female Lift 123 392 259 132 410 300 148 480 309 165 508 314 181 556 347 198 563 363
/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:02 AM
2

Obviously there isn't since I'm not agreeing. Obviously, you don't know the meaning of the word "general." You know what else they say about feminism by "general agreement" on wikipedia? that feminism means equality. do you agree with that too? Ah, yes, the ole "there is one mistake; therefore, I can disregard all the facts and believe whatever I want." "Alchemy was wrong; therefore, chemistry is too." "Experts once believed the earth was flat; therefore, how can we trust 'experts' on climate ch…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 06:05 AM
1

No, they are right wing authoritarians. "There is general agreement that the Left includes: progressives, communists, social-liberals, greens, social-democrats, socialists, democratic-socialists, left-libertarians, secularists, feminists, autonomists, anti-imperialists, anti-capitalists, and anarchists." The classic use of right wing-left wing has Democrats on the left side (toward government control of the market for social justice purposes, away from government implementation of religious-base…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:54 AM
1

I stumbled upon this post accidentally, but I want to point out that your explanation is wrong. If you flip a coin 4 times, each flip will give heads with probability 1/2. Likewise, each flip will give tails with probability 1/2. How can we calculate the probability of getting heads at least once? Well, we could add the probability of getting 1 head, the probability of getting 2 heads, etc. Or, we could recognize that the probability of getting at least one flip of heads is equivalent to one min…
/r/MensRights30/12/14 05:17 AM
12

It's more the fact that feminists thought she had a serious chance of winning -- coupled with what came to light about her outright exploitation of her own husband and kids. To quote u/WhatWouldHitchensSay and u/Fetish_Goth (in response) above, respectively, "She is most famous for opposing a bill that ended up passing over her objections. She is an outspoken abortion rights activist. She married a man who adopted her daughters and paid for her education. She then left her daughters with him to …
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:11 PM
8

Not unlike how racism blinded a lot of Republicans from thinking Obama could ever become president. I was with you until that. I know a lot of Republicans -- many of whom fit the general stereotype. Every one of them thought Obama would become president because he was black.
/r/MensRights22/12/14 06:04 PM
7

There are lots of assholes who aren't criminally prosecuted. Reminds me of the quote by H.L. Mencken: "The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all."
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:21 PM
11

From what I'm given to understand, neither Dworkin nor MacKinnon actually said that quote. Perhaps not the exact phrase, but Dworkin certainly expressed the idea. All these quotes in the comments are taken straight from Dworkin's book Intercourse, and they do everything but say all sex is rape. "Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of contempt for women’s bodies." "Violation is a synonym for intercourse." "Physically, the woman in intercourse is a space inhabited, a literal territ…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 03:18 AM
13

God, this really blows the door wide open for all sorts of unimaginable stupidity. "I wouldn't've had sex with him if I had known he was cheating" or "I only slept with him because I thought we were going to get married someday" (already a valid crime in India) or "I didn't know he was on drugs" or whatever. It is all infantilization bullshit, which will do nothing but make the legal system (more of) a tool for revenge. This is how western civilization goes down. Relocation to China is my nuclea…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:57 PM
7

The foreskin has 10000-15000 nerve endings and also serves as a protective layer for the head. The biggest issue is that without the foreskin, the nerves will slowly lose sensitivity, and sexual pleasure will attenuate over time. So even though it's rare, it is possible for an increase in the short term -- but it usually won't last. It'd be awesome if that guy could try to chart out the sensations of masturbation and sex over the next several years to see what happens.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:39 PM
3

how is it not similar? Why don't you respond to the 3 other comments who already spelled out how it is not similar?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:35 PM
3

Come on man, do you really want to argue that a 4-year-old should be in charge of ANYTHING in their life? Hell, he can barely build something with his LEGOs or dress or feed himself, so he should not be in charge of his own health care decisions...I have no problem with shredding the parents in this case, but the kid should not get any say, because they obviously lack the understanding or capability to make anything close to an informed decision. I think that is a pretty poorly-informed view -- …
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:33 PM
2

I want to stress that RapeX is meant as a deterrent. If a few male rapists get their junk impaled on this thing, or even if just the rumor of it spreads enough, then maybe others will think twice before raping. I don't think it will work so well. Once word spreads, what is to stop a potential rapist from just sticking a finger or piece of cloth in there first and scooping the device out?
/r/MensRights01/10/14 09:30 PM
1

Just because you don't understand how something works doesn't mean it's not controlled for. That's an important gap you need to understand. I have to chuckle at the irony here. Keep it up. Rods come in three flavours - red, blue, and green. That means every one who is not colorblind... Tell me something, what causes colorblindness? Why do some people have it and others don't? Must be an awful concentrated bit of culture some people suffer through. There couldn't be certain subsets of colorblindn…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 07:34 PM
2

They did not confess to lying, they withdrew accusations. That's wrong. In the actual study, Kanin lists out many of their confessions and quotes the reasons they personally gave for lying. Examples: "An unmarried 16-year-old female had sex with her boyfriend and later became concerned that she might be pregnant. She said she had been raped by an unknown assailant in the hopes that the hospital would give her something to abort the possible pregnancy." "A divorced female, 25 years of age, whose …
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:56 AM
1

I am generally fan of the APA, so I do thank you for linking that article about a study. First, Miyake adds that these findings support the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis that language shapes or determines thought. "It had been out of favor, but the work of [this research team] has rekindled psychologists' interest," he notes. A statement like that indicates studies in support of relativism are in the minority. The study tracked color naming, comprehension and memory in two populations over three years.…
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:14 AM
1

It's so good to see an entire field of linguistics can be easily debunked by a redditor When an entire field of linguistics is based on confirmation bias and emotional dependence on the result, it can be easily debunked by a toddler, actually. Not unlike creationism, climate change denial, or gender studies. that cannot distinquish between color perception and shade differentiation. LOL, trying to sound smart doesn't work if you can't back it up with remotely logical arguments. Have you consider…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:27 PM
1

Yes, I understand the concept of linguistic relativity -- I'm saying any remotely strong versions are false and ridiculous. I read through Whorf's own examples on the Sapir-Whorf page, and they were pitiful. This idea seems to be just another form of the long-debunked denialist theory of "Blank Slatism." How do you think pink was named in the first place? How did crayola give names to all their 200-whatever slightly different shades which previously had no names? How is it that all 4 sections of…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 04:39 PM
1

For example - pink. It's not really a color, just light red. But we see it as pink because we named it. That doesn't make any sense -- my eyes see this for what it is. I simply call it "pink" because that is the English name given to that specific shade of red. Calling it "pink" instead of "light red" doesn't change how my eyes actually see it though. In the same way that we could give any of these colors its own name without changing anything about it. I don't know the names of most of the shad…
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:26 AM
1

The post you linked doesn't really refute that, either, I think; it notes precisely that for magnitudes that one can not grasp inherently one uses linguistic tricks. Well, for starters, it states that humans in general have the inherent ability to discriminate among numbers less than or equal to 4. More importantly, the first response to that post points out that we observe the same biology-based subitization in other animals (which have no spoken language). This casts doubt on the notion that b…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:44 PM
5

And in case anyone was deluded into believing the ridiculous lie that feminists want equality, One. Two. Three.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:53 PM
1

There's an African tribe who differentiate colour differently; they have different words for different colours, and they can distinguish different colours we don't distinguish. I'd like to see some of the details on that. For starters, how do we know they haven't evolved different rod/cone sensitivities, with the language simply reflecting biology? We already know there are gender differences in color discrimination; it isn't unreasonable that an isolated tribe could've adapted something similar…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:31 AM
2

Why would feminists be against male birth control? Watch this.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 06:31 PM
2

we hope this isn't a con where they run off with all the money that was donated for security, You mean like Anita Sarkeesian? while claiming to be the first people in history to receive anonymous threats. Well, did anyone murder your dog?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:48 AM
1

The family court system is heavily biased against fathers. As a result, fathers typically only apply for custody when their cases are quite strong. Most situations are settled out of court, and there are many where even capable fathers are advised by legal counsel that pursuing custody would be an expensive, painful, ultimately futile battle. More information can be found here.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:43 AM
18

The backfire effect.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 12:43 AM
2

Interestingly, that idea started as conjecture in Susan Brownmiller's book and has somehow taken hold with almost no evidence. Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker talks about the subject a little bit in his ama here. Now, I'd say undoubtedly there are some serial rapists -- particularly those who assault in the first degree -- who do have power-related motives. However, suggesting that no humans would take their strongest bodily desire by force is pretty ridiculous in my opinion.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:17 AM
2

Your link isn't working for me, but here is a comprehensive study indicating that girls are basically given grade boosts for good conduct.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 11:36 PM
5

LOL, you're either a troll or literally retarded. Possibly both. I'm not going to refer to anything you mentioned, hope you understand.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:26 AM
6

Your post screams "confirmation bias," so I'm probably wasting my time, but here are a few pieces of information for you: Feminists were largely responsible for the FBI's new definition of rape which (either explicitly or implicitly) excludes female perpetrators. When Erin Pizzey tried to open a male domestic abuse shelter, feminists flooded her with death threats and even murdered her dog. The Duluth model of domestic violence is based in (feminist) patriarchy theory -- and literally states tha…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter