TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwaway3413418 Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by throwaway3413418 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

For you to read that guy’s account and respond with zero empathy shows that you are deeply disordered and misanthropic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 02:08 PM
10

If you were arguing in favor of this post, what would your argument be?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:51 PM
10

I’m also trying to write something that captures similar themes at the moment, but it’s a real struggle because I don’t want it to come across as preachy, and I want to let the story and characters lead. Basically I’m trying to avoid coming across like some MRAyn Rand. Do yall feel that same struggle?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/26 08:03 PM
43

I think it’s possible that more young women are paying lip service to feminism, while actual participation in feminist actions isn’t growing, and uncritical deference to feminist narratives is fading. The downside of this is that I think a sort of Frankenstein ideology is forming where instead of claiming to reject traditionalism, many young women are embracing the parts of it that give them privilege while rejecting the parts that give men privilege. And while in many ways this always happened,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 01:06 PM
20

This isn’t really based on any numbers, just a gut feeling, but I don’t feel like feminism is growing in popularity among women (in the sense of performing activism on women’s issues). Polling shows that misandry is growing, however, and to the degree they overlap could cause a misperception that feminism is growing. It really seems to be that both misandry and misogyny of nontraditional forms are growing as younger men and women feel disconnected and pitted against one another by modern structu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 12:59 PM
25

trad con coded The obsession with mischaracterizing male behaviors, both good and bad, as being motivated by a desire for control is very much a feminist trait.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/04/26 12:19 PM
6

Oh no where’d you go? 🥺
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 02:51 AM
22

a bit Is a blatant lie to amplify the prevalence 62,000 times just “a bit” to you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 02:46 AM
10

I also have no clue why the real mods let mvea post there. It’s a spam account which shares tons of low-quality but controversy generating articles. If you’re going to share research there I think it should at least be plausible that you read it closely, and there’s no way that account is reading all the shit they post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 01:14 AM
30

Moderation there is just inconsistent because it’s a massive sub and almost all the comments are rulebreaking, but the vast majority of mods are just supposed to remove comments and not do any deleting posts or banning. It’s terribly boring and also demotivating because you have to read the same low effort pseudointellectual shit which is basically endless. You can clean up a thread and then within five minutes it’s shit again. Before I deleted my old account I would occasionally do the janitor …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 11:03 PM
9

No, that quoted excerpt is from the section before the solutions one, describing how governments gain the consent of the governed by targeting undesirables first for unpopular policies. I see Russia mentioned in the solutions section, but as an example of tricks we want to prevent from being possible (drafting without declaring war because declaring war cuts off a number of resources).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/26 01:47 PM
13

For example, in Russia they decided to start with most disadvantaged (poor and uneducated from the regions) or pariah groups of people (convicts). I don’t see how this could be interpreted as praise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/26 01:12 PM
5

Yes, it’s actually that bad. When I got to that part, I thought that maybe it wasn’t satire and you were a crazy person lol. The contradiction there is comparatively subtle.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 05:07 AM
10

By that point I was rushing until the end and missed the joke. What sold it as satire for me was the suicide rates/methods/except in the UK… part lol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 02:50 AM
34

What’s funny is how heavy-handed the writing is with all blatant and immediate contradictions, and yet I still found myself going back and forth on what you were doing and whether you were sincere as I moved from the contradiction-heavy parts to the more long-winded and standalone arguments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/26 02:07 AM
4

As a third party to this, I don’t think you’ve made a clear case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 06:59 PM
5

This seems like pedantry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 01:35 PM
2

This was the reason I went from saying I was technically a feminist to realizing that I’m not. It’s not just that I don’t like the culture of feminism, it’s that I realized the underpinning patriarchy theory is wrong. Traditional gender norms are not like white supremacy or classism. They’re a system which prescribes rigid roles for both men and women but could only be said to elevate one over the other if you use selective reasoning. They certainly aren’t “oppression of women as a class by men …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 04:16 PM
15

I did read it. You are severely mistaken. You’re trying to tell us all what we actually believe, and it’s insulting that you assume we just haven’t considered these, frankly, not terribly sophisticated, emotional arguments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 08:49 PM
24

Why are you on this subreddit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 07:33 PM
0

We’re gonna have to get some lowercase before we can get uppercase.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:37 PM
9

I think social change largely happens when conditions permit it, not when a group against all obstacles just decides to rise up and change things. Jesus existed in a time in which radical teachers were a dime a dozen due to the identity crises of the Levant associated with Roman rule. Slavery in the US came to be abolished only after there were technological influences in parts of the country that mitigated some of its usefulness to the oppressor class. I think, similarly, feminism gained power …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:22 PM
12

When it came to women’s issues, did we constantly repeat with every action the phrase “women need to solve their own problems, not depend on men to do it”? Or was the messaging instead about how men have a responsibility to aid and do active work on their own? Were any of the people saying that men needn’t be involved actually supportive of social change or were they opponents?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 04:10 PM
10

Is it up to boys to stand up against the teachers who enforce traditional expectations on them? How do you propose they do that? Should male infants rise up and take a stand against circumcision? Saying that any social change, whether for the benefit of men or women, needs to be an initiative characteristically enacted by the ones experiencing the disadvantage, is a recipe for nothing changing, and ignorant of how historically social change required active work from the privileged other. The rec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 03:59 PM
21

Men aren’t suffering systemic issues because individual women coincidentally happened to treat them poorly, I agree with that much. Men are suffering systemic issues in part because women (mothers, teachers, friends, romantic prospects, wives) on average still enforce traditional gender roles on them, with little change over the decades.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 01:27 PM
16

Do you think there’s a dichotomy in feminist messaging to men vs. other feminists? Could feminists perhaps be teaching this type of empowerment to the in-group (“only you can save yourself—take charge!”) while simultaneously be sending very different messages to men (“you benefit from the patriarchy, other men will only listen to you, and therefore you must be the one to tear down the system”). Would you be open-minded if a man told you the latter messaging, something well beyond “just be an all…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 01:25 PM
12

I would argue that male suicide is much more attributable to the disposability with which society characterizes men. Not only are men told that their problems aren’t important, due to unequal access to social safety nets, they are more often placed into situations in which suicide can actually be rationalized as a solution to their problems by the distressed mind. I think they are also more likely to consider suicide when they have stopped feeling useful due to how they are conditioned from adol…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/25 01:08 PM
1

You just wrote four paragraphs and didn’t make a relevant point in any of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/25 06:33 PM
7

It’s nice that you seem to be open-minded and willing to learn in the moment, but what’s frustrating is: 1) you don’t grow in your beliefs—you always return to your original beliefs the next time the topic is raised, 2) you try to steer every discussion you participate in here to a defense of feminism, couched with meager self-criticisms to show that you’re a free-thinker, 3) you spam multiple replies in every thread and dominate the discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 04:38 PM
8

It is not a fact. Your beliefs are not self-evident. This seems to be the biggest hurdle feminists have in interacting with outsiders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 04:35 PM
3

Please try to take a little more time to understand before spamming replies. My point is not complex, and nobody else seems to have had trouble understanding it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 04:34 PM
9

One of feminism’s greatest flaws is its conservative-like fixation on holding everyday people (men) “accountable” for society’s ills.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 02:40 PM
6

You literally said it yourself: I also don’t treat black men as sacred as men they may have reactionary ideas about feminism no dissimilar to a lot of men (albeit not as bad)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 02:39 PM
19

“I know that they’re men, meaning still of inferior morality, but also that they’re black, so that gives them some points and results in a reduced level of inferiority.” Truly insightful intersectional analysis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/25 01:38 PM
5

It’s incredibly obvious that you’re unable to refute any of the responses to you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 01:39 PM
4

This is such a superficial view of men’s issues.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 01:25 PM
1

And “plenty” of Republicans don’t support Donald Trump. It doesn’t mean I’ll call myself a Republican just because you can find some basic opinions probably shared by most humans that I don’t disagree with them on. The people with the biggest voices in the movement, the thought leaders, the mouthpieces, the financiers, are either supportive of or tolerant of his toxicity. The same is true for feminism. It’s not like being anti-feminist is going to make me stop supporting gender equality. It just…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 08:07 PM
1

But I was super clear that this can and does happen in other groups. It’s a product of human psychology. You can’t stop it, you can only mitigate it. But my problem is that feminism 1) is so socially powerful and 2) is hostilely resistant to any request to mitigate it. I throw it all out because 1) radical feminism is built upon a nonsense framework (patriarchy theory) even if it sometimes does good. I reject radical feminism for the same reason I’d go to a physical therapist instead of a chirop…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 07:59 PM
1

Men are a demographic, not a moral group It’d be nice if you’d at least read my post before replying. I covered this in the last paragraph.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 06:59 PM
1

Was this a reply to the wrong comment?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 06:32 PM
2

I think their analogy is a great entry way to understand it. We know that religious people justify their own misdeeds on the basis that being religious makes them moral people, and that they justify misdeeds against people outside their religion on the basis that those people are morally inferior. That same psychological trap happens in feminism. It’s what allows a feminist to justify harassment and death threats against people they view as misogynists. It enables them to excuse behavior they ot…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/25 05:48 PM
5

Calling stuff common sense when you can’t explain it is absurd.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 11:18 PM
6

Circumcision is performed on both males and females.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 09:46 PM
8

I guess it doesn’t matter what the laws say, so long as you’re confident that you can just hide in the attic. I notice you absolutely refuse to admit when you’re wrong. You just sidestepped the circumcision point. Why don’t you start over and try to participate in good faith?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 09:16 PM
7

Circumcision laws and the draft are blatantly not equal by gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/25 08:14 PM
13

Totally coincidentally, I happened to run across this in another post on this sub right after replying to you: The crude "stocking room," often no more than a curtained space in one corner of the bank lobby, has grown into a well-furnished room, sometimes a suite, many times with a maid and a woman with title of assistant cashier assigned to the duties of advising women on banking affairs. Telephones, desks, tasteful stationery and writing materials are provided. Easy chairs and charming draperi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 03:47 PM
3

While this is true, it’s absolutely overstated in left wing circles. A majority of white female voters voted for Donald Trump in 2024. Male desirability even among liberal women is still biased toward traditional values and personalities more common among conservatives (high earning, fields like business/finance, entrepreneurship, high self-confidence, extroversion, paying for dates). There has even been research showing that women find conservative men more attractive (not as a result of their …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 03:38 PM
2

I’ve been catcalled by women in cars while out running starting from around 17.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 03:29 PM
20

I think a good faith reading of the OP leaves no possibility of misconstruing what they said in that way, so it’s not something to be worried about. You’re having a knee-jerk response which isn’t based on any reasoning. Modern women are concerned with men showing their emotions in what they deem a healthy way, and are familiar with terms like emotional labor and toxic masculinity. Traditional women are generally either oblivious to these concepts or view them with hostility, as examples of men b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 03:12 PM
17

In what way does OP’s usage of the term make that relevant?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 03:11 PM
35

Misandrists also call people incels, so I guess that means you can never use the term again, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 03:05 PM
14

Why does it sound like incel speak? Please give a succinct explanation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/10/25 03:04 PM
3

Here we see how empty you ultimately are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/10/25 04:45 PM
3

I mean, it’s literally staring you in the face that there are legal ways of refusing the financial and interpersonal relationships of parenthood. You’re also not engaging in good faith if you can’t admit that these laws are in effect ways for specifically mothers to give up children. All of the arguments for them center on mothers. I’d challenge you to show any evidence of a significant number of fathers using them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 10:12 PM
1

Wait, so are you now changing your position from “no one has [the right to abandon your own child]” to “everyone does”?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 04:22 PM
6

Women already have the right to anonymously give up newborns up to various ages at specific locations in all 50 US states. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Safe-haven_law
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 11:53 AM
6

Women already have that through safe haven laws.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/25 11:50 AM
7

All I see is someone trying to suffocate discussion rather than engaging genuinely.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 06:03 PM
8

si vis pacem para bellum The peaceful times post ww2 are over You don’t seem to be capable of arguing a consistent point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 05:41 PM
7

The peaceful times post ww2 are over, a lot of countries are now preparing for war You said this earlier up, so you can’t hide behind that excuse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 05:34 PM
14

Guarantee it, which is why it’s wild that they feel like forcibly sending men to risk their lives for prison wages isn’t something to get bothered about. Conscription is a bodily autonomy issue just like abortion, and it also is a life-and-death matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 05:26 PM
9

Please answer my question about what women’s rights you are passionate about.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 04:32 PM
16

Why USA notwithstanding? What women’s rights issues in the USA are you passionate about?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 04:06 PM
23

it kinda is what it is Interested whether or not you’re this apathetic when it comes to injustices women face. When it comes to abortion rights, more countries are facing falling birth rates and are doing what they can to combat it, so it kinda is what it is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/25 03:54 PM
6

Thank god you came here to tell us dumb men what is and isn’t important. We’d be lost without you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 07:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter