TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwaway477549 Archive

View 5 posts and 234 comments by throwaway477549 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Ah figured. Good talk old man.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 08:05 PM
–

Well then by your logic you seem to have the answer to all dating and have no need to even BE here. Married? Kids? House? What did YOU do? What makes YOUR experience so beneficial to share with others that you think it'll give them just the right kick in the ass to get a GF or SO and become happy in the U S of A?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:55 PM
–

I revised my statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:50 PM
–

Well maybe that's for the better? I mean what is a 40 year old with 2 kids and a wife going to offer as advice to a 21 year old college kid on hooking up or dating? Nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:44 PM
–

Yea, there should be gate keeping on certain subs to weed out certain people not because they may not be able to give advice but because the insight they give is in the same vein as "pull yourself by your bootstraps" logic and I'm sorry we don't live in that type of era anymore and haven't for a very long time. In fact, I would go one step further and nuke accounts that openly state they are married as well. Plenty of places for them to go on and vent, I don't need opinions or insight from a Kar…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 07:31 PM
0

So there are two kinds of women (and only two because the last is rare) with respect to this topic. 1) The realistic woman who accepts that modern society has changed and sexist standards such as men being the ones who pay for everything is a dead tradition 2) Narcissists The last option is a woman who offers to pay for the date herself and this is too rare to quantify.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 05:08 PM
0

You know, yea.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 12:42 PM
0

Indian men in particular are some of the most abnormally horny and utterly shameless men I have ever encountered. Them and boomers make up much of the onlyfans simp crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 12:17 PM
–

Do you just want someone to call you ignorant?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/24 01:25 AM
27

This is bait of EXCELLENT QUALITY 10/10 can't wait to see 500 updoots and 500+ comments in about 4 hours
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 12:41 PM
0

Because humans are animals sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 12:24 AM
1

They comment to afford rhetoric in line with the topic at hand, not just to throw nonsense out that doesn't change my point. A typical woman thing it's OK sweetheart.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/24 12:23 AM
-2

Had to make a comment didn't you? Like you could've just moved on but guess you couldn't hold it in.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 07:19 PM
-2

Plenty of animals in nature have women approach men first. You're argument is sexist, biased, and honestly idiotic. But what was I to expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 05:41 PM
0

When I made a post regarding this same topic I got a lot of these. I still stand by my statement that society has built a sexist dynamic against men to initiate the chase and that men need to stop doing it and allow for the sexist system to recalibrate.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 01:28 PM
1

Shocking.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:03 PM
2

The irony is that those hobbies you listed that may be found as "healthy male hobbies" by men AND women are the same hobbies deeply rooted in toxic masculinity that women are notably against. I've met men who enjoy those things and I can say they aren't usually the crowd I would ever be caught dead with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 09:13 PM
2

Exactly, I think there's a limit to when a hobby becomes an addiction or an escape.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 08:28 PM
2

Can you tell me definitively and objectively what constitutes a "serious male hobby"?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 07:30 PM
0

Sure thing
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 05:29 PM
1

Exactly. I think there is a limit between someone who may be addicted to something like a video game but even that passes with time and it's no different than women on social media 24/7.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 04:24 PM
-1

I think you're going to the extreme here but we cna run with that. What if your man was a writer? Would you be mad at him for canceling plans because he was too focused on writing his novel? Self published mind you? The idea here is that a hobby is something that makes you happy, your man using video games as a mean to escape depression is normal and healthy as opposed to him doing something toxic like gambling, infidelity and before you say THERAPY that only makes matters worse more often as no…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 04:21 PM
–

Hey mod, why is this still up? It has NOTHING to do with discussion about gender or anything it has nothing to do with the sub. Are you just one of those power hungry mods that doesn't care for the rules if it falls in line with your thinking?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 04:02 PM
-1

So you believe that woman who made this comment is a grifter?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 03:17 PM
6

Time and time again there is always a survival show that pits men Vs women, this isn't a concept worth over thinking given it is reality tv but to counter your claim, there was a Dutch Survival show called Expeditie Robinson, and on one season it pitted again a team of women Vs men. I won't go into all the details you can look them up yourself but suffice it to say, the women society they created was so poorly done they had to eventually ask the men for help as the men had created a functional s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 02:59 PM
–

He's a fucking moron literally has no clue how life works and probably just high when he posted this, surprised the mods left this up tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:06 PM
2

This line of thinking is exactly what deifnes the concept of ignorance and hyper normalization. Americans in particular are taught to believe they are the center of the universe and nothing can ever stop them (until their money gets nuked however) but it doesn't say anything constructive for posts like this to claim that OH ITS NOT REAL I DONT EVER SEE IT. You dont ever see it because you aren't looking for it. It's out there for you to see you're either turning a blind eye on purpose to validat…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 01:02 PM
4

And here we go with the whole "risk" nonsense. Everyone faces risks when approaching people for the first time. A woman who seeks a man for whatever reason at a bar is more likely to have a higher risk of something happening to them than her approaching a man at the grocery store. Men however face mental risk and possibly legal risk everytime they approach. It's not a one way street here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 09:03 PM
1

Well, I mean your SO/wife. The topic describes it as "husband/wife" not girlfriend. If your GF is not your best friend that's whatever but if your WIFE isn't your best friend wew lad. But understand that that friendship develops, a great woman who just clicks with you and gets you you'll grow over time to realize she's your best friend and that's usually when you accept marriage or whatever you want to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:54 PM
2

For the sake of argument, I'm male, I believe my SO is my best friend and partner and lover and grand pubha etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:34 PM
0

You're equating "best friend" as a trivial term, best friend, partner, SO whatever they are interchangeable. You tell your best friend anything, you can also fuck your best friend, you can also go out with your best friend, you can start a business with your best friend etc etc
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:33 PM
2

I identify as an attack helicopter, but not sure why that matters here, my belief is a relationship is a friendship, and love is naturally a friendship of the highest quality. It doesn't make sense for someone to claim they love their SO and believe they are not friends or best friends with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:23 PM
3

I doubt that highly
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 08:21 PM
1

Is there really a divide apart from what you have as evidence? It seems fairly common sense for anyone to go into a relationship expecting their SO to be a best friend to them otherwise I mean, what else are they? It'd be very telling of their red flags if either of them to assume otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 07:58 PM
12

I've literally made a post on this topic once before and was met with vitriol about it. Women should be taught to approach men they like and men continuing to perpetuate that sexist stereotype they are to be the chaser is, as I said before, sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 07:57 PM
–

Imagine trying to tell a Gen z to go do things that don't require money. Going out for walks, talking in parks, even just sitting at home and doodling is something zoomers can't comprehend.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 07:14 PM
1

If the law is against you in a case where you know you are the victim, then you should take justice into your hands. If someone ruins your livelihood, reputation and pushes you into a corner, then you should do something about it. The only people who disagree with that have never experienced injustice themselves or are simply bootlickers.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 11:57 AM
3

Invisalign isn't a cure all, there are some dental conditions that won't be solved by them
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 12:01 AM
0

Sure I can make this bet. I'll use myself actually especially since you have seen my comments which is good cause I can finally delete this account. Heres what we can do, I can draw up a contract, write it up for let's say... $2000, I'll forward it to you, then you can sign it, I'll have it notarized, it'll contain information on how to forward the money (I accept crypto payments so a metamask is something you should hopefully have) and you can forward the money to it when you lose. This will re…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 08:32 PM
–

Nothing to debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:37 PM
0

You want to make a wager on that? I can figure out a way to prove you wrong there lol I'm sure it's been done many times. I bet you're also in the realm of thinking that those who have no friends can't have a romantic relationship or expect one right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:33 PM
1

Yea yea I already admitted it was an over generalization I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 06:42 PM
-2

Ah, going through my history I see, sneaky you. While my own interests such as that aren't exactly topics I would personally bring up to make friends (I mean seriously, what dark fetishes do you enjoy?) , it doesn't mean there aren't others who wouldn't agree with me. But with regards to that, if you're trying to make a stab at me then again, sorry to burst your bubble but I do have friends, and I just post here to have spirited conversations and debates. If that agitates you - which it clearly …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 06:20 PM
0

That's not what was being discussed. Read again.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 06:15 PM
1

The statement "A person who has no friends can't be in a relationship" commits the False Dilemma (also known as a False Dichotomy or Black-and-White Thinking) fallacy. This fallacy occurs when the argument presents two options as if they are the only possibilities, excluding other viable alternatives. In this case, it implies that having friends is a necessary condition for being in a relationship, which is not true; a person can be in a romantic or other types of relationships without having fr…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 06:07 PM
1

You're not reading then, the stats show that loneliness isn't contained in just a vacuum of feelings, it's also social isolation, reports of lack of close friends or NO close friends, if you're just looking to validate an opinion not based on stats at all then idk what to tell you buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 05:51 PM
1

Mm.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 05:33 PM
2

You know there's a separate bumble for friends right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 05:30 PM
1

Don't apologize like you know me. I'm saying that your logic is a fallacy and to harbor it as a belief is ignorant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 05:19 PM
0

In this particular context given that reddit is not the majority of the world, then yes they are outliers, however within the confines of the statistics, not all men have a circle of friends or alot of people they can call close friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 05:17 PM
1

Ooohh... You. Socializing for men is not equal to socializing for women and conflating the two forms an unrealistic belief. Men don't seek friendships, they seek relationships and usually with the opposite sex. Even someone else here stated that a man seeking a friendship on a dating app like bumble nods to a homosexual encounter.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 05:09 PM
3

I've already posted stats in this thread you can feel free to review. Most men do NOT have a circle of friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 04:56 PM
-1

Some men will obvs post here to try to prove me wrong but the statistics are what is against them, outliers always exist. You make a good point though about the solid/deep meaning of a friendship though
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 04:45 PM
3

OK fam, go take a walk or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 04:41 PM
-1

I have one best friend actually so your assumption is wrong unfortunately sorry to burst your bubble. I admit my generalizing was a bit heavy handed but I don't exactly know many men who go out to celebrate birthdays with one another so...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 04:41 PM
4

I'm sure buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 04:39 PM
2

I'm just boiling it down to the things most women can easily recall, or at least those I know of. What is friendship is someone who can always be there for you when you're down or just interested in making the time to hang out with you, question your passions, hobbies etc. If that's not a friend to you than define it for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 04:39 PM
1

That's definitely cultural and yes that is a factor here to take into consideration.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:50 PM
-3

Oh well if you're being serious then no. I don't know any males that have a relationship similar to some females I'm acquainted with. Europe culture may be different than American but the idea still persists.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:49 PM
4

Toxic masculinity probably. Someone here actually said this once and it resonated with me. If you're a woman, and find another woman crying in the bathroom of your workplace or bar etc, you'll probably wanna know what's up, but a man approaching another man who is crying in the same area? The man will probably not bat an eye but mentally feel like shit for not.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:37 PM
-5

Are you purposefully inverting everything I said with no actual basis/claims or is this sarcasm? Use the /s when necessary please.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:36 PM
1

That's a bit over assuming. You can go to any of those same events and spot the loner in all of them, would YOU approach that person? Ask them what's up? And to retort your "dungeon" view, I met a good friend once on Bloodborne, met up, had drinks, pre covid so it was whatever, but he died about a year back regardless, still you can meet people not jsut at social events nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:34 PM
2

Oh I can see it, I think some people here would NEVER go to a bar/dance club alone in search of a relationship or hook up even, because they know their chances are slim to none EVEN if attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:23 PM
0

Then if you're an outlier you're an outlier, but given what I said about the male at the bar, which would you be more inclined to find more desirable or even approachable?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:20 PM
2

Flair checks out
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:19 PM
3

I've been to a few hobby groups myself, I won't say what kind but I've been a regular to one, and while the men there are all pretty casual, rarely will one ever just strike up a conversation outside of "what you working on" and even then if pushed further it doesn't end with "we should chill sometime". Because this sub is dedicated to relationship/gender/sexuality the topic needs to be revolving around that somehow but I do agree that men SHOULD be making friends with other males for the sake o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:19 PM
1

But you probably didn't date them correct? Or seek TO actively date them correct? For a women to see a man at a bar by himself, drinking a beer, assume good looking, as more desirable than a man who can have his buddies sit and play pool at the same bar and laugh and have a good time seems a bit of a stretch to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:11 PM
3

So then a man shouldn't expect to ever have his own "bestie" right?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:03 PM
1

Well good for you
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:02 PM
-2

BUUTTTT to get that social interaction requires the woman to decide whether or not they want to meet that mysterious lone wolf sigma out at the bar or dance club. See the paradox?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:02 PM
0

So you're arguing against the majority then. It's an epidemic and it's there because everyone agrees it's one.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:59 PM
2

I think MAKING friends is the part that really is the problem, not just the support system that comes from it which most men don't do either and that ties back to again the idea that men don't know how to be friends with other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:58 PM
1

Well I'd need more women to validate that then, I feel like while the "lone wolf" can be a cool and mysterious person to some women, it can also be off putting.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:55 PM
0

But do you agree the linkage to desirability is inherently there?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:54 PM
2

No? Lol you're stating that men have friends but are just incapable of speaking to them about being lonely which is NOT the same as men not having friends at all and being/feeling socially isolated.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:53 PM
2

No they didn't. General Loneliness: - Men: As mentioned earlier, a 2021 study by the Harvard Graduate School of Education found that 61% of Americans reported feeling lonely, with men, particularly younger men (18-24), reporting higher levels of loneliness (68%). - Women: The same study found that while women also reported significant levels of loneliness, the percentages were slightly lower in some age groups. For instance, among women aged 18-24, approximately 59% reported loneliness. In gener…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:52 PM
1

I'm not misinterpreting the epidemic. It is exactly as it sounds. Prevalence of Loneliness Among Men: 1.General Loneliness: A 2021 study by the Harvard Graduate School of Education found that 61% of Americans reported feeling lonely, with men being more likely to experience loneliness than women. Among men aged 18-24, this number was even higher, with around 68% reporting significant loneliness. Friendship Decline: A 2021 American Perspectives Survey revealed that the percentage of men without a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:43 PM
2

I don't think that phones in and of themselves are the overall cause for males lacking friends, I've personally used certain social media to search for new friends when I moved from one state to another and while it didn't help, I can see why some use it. Point being is, if you were at a bar and saw a few guys shooting pool, would you just casually walk over and shoot with them?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:39 PM
0

I agree there but would you agree that in some corners of OLD or even mainstream circles, that having friends is somewhat of a deal breaker to women if the male does not? Looks notwithstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:36 PM
3

None, there's not much a man can offer a women at the same value as sex. Regardless of what others may argue, it still won't hold that same power. What does that mean though? It means that men need to start realizing that if a woman is using that card to play the game then she is garbage because sex isn't exactly out of the range of men either in terms of escorts or other means and while nefarious are still valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:04 PM
1

Oh I should be? Tell me what else I should be doing OH WISE SEX GOD! Are you worshippers enjoying summer?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:05 PM
2

I mean why aren't women inclined to massage the male "gspot" aka Prostate according to some research (which I don't believe) regardless you and this entire thread really, is prefaced on the belief that men don't care about sex because they don't have the instruction manual given to them on how to do it "properly" which is to say that every single human male on this fucking planet must be taught how to fuck a woman properly. That is preposterous, childish, and honestly insulting. And anyone who a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:01 PM
–

Hentai has some really good stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 08:00 PM
–

I just beat Melania finally after try 1,750 good fight would recommend.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:58 PM
–

I only watch porn to gauge whether the story is interesting. Usually it's not so I turn it off and play video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:57 PM
9

Don't bother arguing with that one, dense as a board.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 07:20 PM
3

Again I didn't say what you're inferring. I used the cockring as an example to state that clitoral stimulation isn't something that just happens during sex. It happens when either person chooses to open that door and this answers your next question, it doesn't occur to most men because we aren't thinking that. We shouldn't have to. If you want to rub one out while I'm balls deep you go for it girl, more power to you, you want ME to though? Oh well then maybe ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:48 PM
3

Yes I am telling you that. And no it didn't take a cockring or whatever to do it. I'm a passionate person however and my experiences with others is subjective but I can tell and feel when orgasm is achieved. Pleasing your partner as a female is far more simple than as a male, and I won't go into specifics but it just is, as a male there's nuances you can choose to approach or not some guys just get it done as is and that's enough others may require more effort (foreplay, toys, porn etc) but ulti…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:39 PM
2

Being real with you, I don't need to do that, I haven't had a unsatisfied customer, but in general it's not pleasant to have to focus on more than just the action itself rather than the destination. If she orgasms, good for her, but there are many claims from woman (science noted) who haven't ever achieved orgasm through coitus or a partner and only with themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:22 PM
–

What you see online definitely doesn't translate into real life and believing that only translates into your lack of experience in life. Try doing those same things you see on tiktok and see what happens. I'm nowhere near old and while I may not bother with tiktok or social media in general it's mainly because I can spot idiots and as the saying goes, idiots attract other idiots, Gen Z needs to start realizing that and start shutting it down.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:20 PM
4

Now I didn't say that did I? My penis doesn't have a separate bit or appendage to massage the clitoral hood while I'm mid coitus, my balls sure but only from the back and even then that's nothing to do with what OP speaks of and it certainly has nothing to do with whether or not a man is bad at sex. Some women don't want clitoral stimulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 06:13 PM
2

Hold on, is your claim that men not able to extract or determine where a phantom part in the female body (g-spot) is? Or that they don't bother with clitoral stimulus because they don't wear a cockring capable of reaching that area during coitus or because the female can't stimulate herself while coitus is occurring and this is why men don't care about sex? My god.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:52 PM
–

Femcel is an oxymoron, like jumbo shrimp. It can't be true because it automatically invalidates itself. A woman of any status can get laid, a man however of any same status, can't just do it on a whim, prostitution not withstanding. Femcel is a fantasy. Being an uggo, fat woman is still more likely to get laid than an uggo fat man. Or do you wanna make a wager on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:43 PM
–

I thought r/twoxchromosomes still existed?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:31 PM
–

Then that just means they are autistic or otherwise just socially inept. Femcel isn't a word, it doesn't exist. It's a fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:30 PM
–

There is no such thing as a "femcel", all that means is a woman incapable of going out and accepting a date opting instead for attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 05:19 PM
-1

Please don't be a broken record here, at least try to insult me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 03:45 PM
2

All of those topics are completely out of the purview and control of everyone. Most people in America don't even care about them except save the inequality issue because that directly affects their bottom lines. This sub is dedicated to arguing gender norms and sexuality so naturally the topics will be related to women and men, those others are for subs dedicated to those topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 03:16 PM
0

Glad it got the reaction I was looking for sweetie. 🙃
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 03:13 PM
1

And I'll take that as a "I don't know what I'm talking about" thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 03:13 PM
1

Whether you believe you are or aren't is irrelevant, when you openly use tiktok as a source for an argument it lends nothing but give them more views and ad revenue, not to mention that tiktok is not reality and usually a grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 02:50 PM
1

Advertising any form of tiktok or social media should be a bannable offense tbh smdh But back to point, you're living in a bubble believing your thesis statement, and other dissenters here are telling you that what women are willing to offer to other men within the confines of relationships is limited to a very select variety of men, for anyone else it's the salt mines of tinder or single moms.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 12:42 PM
2

Sweetie the whole "you haven't experienced thing" is getting old, try something better next time
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/24 11:31 AM
1

If your father taught you to specifically be weary of all men and not strangers in general then that's poor parenting. It's one thing to watch out for yourself and for parents to likewise instill values of self preservation, but to inspire a belief that all men are out to get you and don't ever approach one (especially when you're of reproductive age ie. 18) that's a bit much.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:22 PM
1

100% rage bait
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:21 PM
1

I did it should be in this string of posts
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 09:16 PM
1

I forget sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:33 PM
1

No, they approach those men by giving signs or signals instead of jsut asking. A cold approach so to speak. Nobody likes games. And that is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:11 PM
-1

OK another one that believes that a woman approaching a man for a simple connection is going to get dragged into an alley, conversation over thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:10 PM
0

That's a bit dramatic. I think some women KNOW they aren't attractive and have accepted they will be alone, while men may take this offensively some have accepted it also but that doesn't mean everyone that gets rejected is ugly etc etc, it's the idea that women believe it to be socially norm for men to approach them (backed by some belief they will be harmed for otherwise approaching themselves?) and that believe is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:09 PM
2

Supply and demand. There aren't enough of that attractive person some commentors claim to be Chad for all women so they can choose the average or accept being alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 07:06 PM
0

Okie
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:30 PM
1

I'd call you something else but it would fly over your head 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:28 PM
1

Someone posting their musings on a forum built around gender and sexuality. Just because they don't rub well with you means nothing, you can easily just not respond. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:27 PM
1

Feel better now, little bird?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:27 PM
18

I've never seen a "pick me" in the wild ever, if it's on social media it's most definitely some kind of grift.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:14 PM
0

Who are you to say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 06:02 PM
0

I'm saying men shouldn't have to chase or gamed into things, if a woman wants something then by the great country of America /s they should approach it! But if they don't, it's because they believe that by doing so they go against cultural and social norms, which is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:58 PM
0

Why SHOULD you is the question? Why do you have that desire at all? As some comments on here have pointed out, what BENEFIT do you get from it? I can say that the presumed idea is connection, and my foundation for that is the idea that humans are "social" creatures. By this forums logic however, men are supposed to be the apporchers not the approachees and the other way around is absolute CHAOS but I boiled it down to what it actually is, sexist. Sexism derived from decades of toxic masculinity …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:56 PM
0

Because emotional damage doesn't mean anything to a guy right? Just pull yourself up by your bootstraps right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:51 PM
1

They are innately being sexist because of social norms. Breaking that stereotype can level out the dynamics and make things fair. But I've come to believe that most humans don't want fairness. The zeitgeist of today is individuality after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:43 PM
1

No Significant Differences Multiple studies have found that men are no more or less likely to be the partner who wants more sex, more often, when compared to women in a dyadic relationship (opposite-sex couples in a relationship with each other). Contrary to Stereotypes Despite common beliefs, a significant proportion of men (up to 1 in 6) regularly experience low levels of sexual desire, making it a problem for them. Additionally, around 14% to 19% of men consistently report having problematica…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:40 PM
1

Just hardwired the way society forces them to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:27 PM
0

In today's world, it behooves the male not to approach a woman. Ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 05:18 PM
1

That's a bit presumptuous in today's society I think. But if that's your position on it, carry on.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:45 PM
-2

They might get hurt EMOTIONALLY sure but that's no different for a male. Same shoe, different feet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:43 PM
0

The point being made by others is that even just approaching a man with the intent of connecting leads to violence. Not some second date nonsense that's on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:41 PM
-2

And that's exactly what I'm getting at. If you were interested, and they were interested, then why don't you open the floor? Otherwise that's sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:40 PM
-2

Good, glad to see you already checked out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:39 PM
0

I'm arguing women's perceived experiences on an anonymous forum, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:38 PM
-1

And by that extent, men should not approach at all if we already know what women are looking for. Correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:37 PM
–

I love how this becomes a topic about me lol yall have serious insecurities I'm just here for a debate on my own musings. Idk who Chad is but if you're claiming that all women want is a guy with a fat paycheck and a career fitting of a king makes even more sense then why men should stop approaching altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:36 PM
-3

And yet here you are, the idea was never about all women not doing it, the idea was that cold approach or approaching in general is rooted in sexism against men to believe they are supposed to be the ones to engage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:32 PM
-1

Gee I wonder where the idea came from that it does happen? Hmmm.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:31 PM
4

Just for you: Here are several examples of animals where the female approaches the male, often taking the lead in courtship or mating rituals: Seahorses: Female seahorses approach males and deposit their eggs into the male's brood pouch, where he fertilizes and carries them until they hatch. Topi Antelopes: Female topi antelopes actively pursue males during the breeding season, even engaging in aggressive competition with other females. Pipefish: Similar to seahorses, female pipefish deposit the…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:30 PM
-2

Despite what social media has you believe, that's not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:28 PM
–

I'm glad you're OK with that. Go on little bird.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:27 PM
0

By denying it all together. Don't approach women ever. Delete dating apps, go to clubs or bars for the atmosphere and enjoy life. Women should come to men, not the other way around because all that has done has alienated a large proportion of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:18 PM
0

Then sorry sister but you're sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:17 PM
-1

The post was directed as a topic of approaching in general, obviously there are outliers here but the idea is that cold approach is something women won't ever find themselves doing because of societal norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:16 PM
2

Acceptable response finally. Yes I do agree with those points and they can be a hindrance to approaching men (strangers) in the cold approach fashion but do I think women that do are in the train of thought you outlined? Not at all, I think again that social norms have generationally conditioned women to believe that men should actively pursue them, and that is sexist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:14 PM
0

First off, this is a debate, not a discussion. And thus far, no one has proven me wrong in stating that women's notion of not taking a proactive approach to asking men on a date or connecting isn't sexist. It certainly is. There is no "danger" unless that danger is warranted, a woman simply speaking to a man (stranger) with the intent of connecting isn't going to face consequences for that, that is absolutely absurd to the point of insulting.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:10 PM
1

Wait wait, so that means that dating apps, clubs, social settings where STRANGERS meet STRANGERS is an utter waste of time?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:06 PM
1

Since you're just being silly I figured I'd return in kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:05 PM
1

How many cats do you have?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 04:00 PM
1

And if men stopped altogether? Do you think women will pick up the slack or just let humanity fade into existence or be replaced by tube babies?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:59 PM
1

You approached a man with the intent of dating them and they hurt you for it? That's what you're telling me.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:54 PM
2

Yea
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:53 PM
-1

Oh wait a minute? Fear and anxiety? You mean the same thing a man has to face when rejected during an approach? Please. The fear is a personal bias built up by horror movies about men, not every man is like that and if a woman is denied, the man isn't going to jsut kill them or hurt them for it that's completely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:51 PM
0

Even in that instance, let's use your example, assuming some social sphere, and I've read this personally, women would give "signals" or "signs" they are interested before ever asking someone they know they like them. And again, it's because of social norms telling them they shouldnt approach first.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:49 PM
1

According to other comments it seems as though physical appearance is more than enough. All those things you listed are all things that are easy to read. Married? Ring Gay? They'll tell you. Weird? Wtf? Etc.. Look the fact is that women choose not to approach men not because of some character trait they THINK they have, but because they believe they shouldn't have to given societal norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:47 PM
1

Then by that extent you like being hit on at the club? Or the bar? Or dating apps? Or do you just not in general and are asexual?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:44 PM
–

This was never about me so you adding some cute quip against me only makes you like like a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:43 PM
-6

You're under the impression I believe everything I read on the internet from anonymous posters. Plenty of people exaggerate claims, make up stories etcetc, I don't disagree there may be some horror stories, but again those are limited. Not every man is some monster from a Vincent price film.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:42 PM
1

That's.. Not nature. Plenty of animals have the females approach the males.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:41 PM
2

Were talking at first glance. If a woman approached a man, cold approach mind you, you think this person would just - hurt them for it? Doesn't that seem a bit... melodramatic?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:40 PM
0

I think it would be a welcome change. A woman who is bold enough to take the approach to speak to a guy they find interesting is an endearing quality. It shows agency, character and for me anyways, it's unique.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:39 PM
-1

Mm. I think that is. Sexist stereotypes don't go one way, the presumption that a man is just going to rip your clothes off and drag you off into a alleyway is an egregious overexaggeration to men and how they operate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:38 PM
-6

And that's a sexist stereotype. The presumption that if a woman speaks to a man they find interesting they will somehow get hurt? Come on guy. There's horror stories sure, but that's mainly what they are. Stories.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:36 PM
-2

Well men do? I saw a great looking girl at the pastry shop the other day, talked with her, got to know a little about her, was going to make the move but decided not to just because I was busy. Why can't a female do that? Isn't connection a benefit? Or have humans been fed a lie that they are social creatures and connection isn't worth it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:33 PM
1

I don't know about this "Chad" mentality, I've been around Chads, even they actively hunt and don't get hit on in the club or bar as pop culture makes it out to believe, it's still a belief system ingrained into women that they aren't supposed to approach and if they do it feels "ick"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:32 PM
2

So social setting is what you believe makes or breaks the cold approach situation for a woman? Then by that extent no one should ever actively seek a relationship or connection with the opposite sex anywhere other than social settings and if you can't do that, you better off being alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:30 PM
-8

It's possible that attraction plays a role more than just "ability to disengage". If a man approaches a girl and assumes there's no interest, a smart self respecting man can just walk away it shouldn't be any different for the opposite sex. What it sounds like you're saying is that FEAR is what takes a front seat in the decision for a woman to approach and that is sexist. Why be afraid? Worst that happens you get rejected, same for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:27 PM
2

Bumble is a poor example given the nature of what it is, most men have already shown it yields poor results even the CEO had to change the algorithm (check the stock) Clubs are one thing, but why not cold approach? Men do it, why can't women? A woman sees someone at the supermarket they find attractive, there's obvious interest form the other party, would they approach? No.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 03:24 PM
0

The difference lies in the fact of how many exist. Polygamy isn't trapped in a vacuum its many things, and to that extent, we see more and more people not just here but on X, Facebook, etc making them. Just because these people aren't out on the streets of Figueroa openly committing acts isn't because it doesn't exist, it's because there's still rule of law.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 08:36 PM
–

Back in the day, trolling was an artform.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 07:04 PM
–

That's who they market it to.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 07:02 PM
–

Attractive is a subjective and high income is unrealistic, let's also not forget any other attributes that are usually a part of those two traits (muscular, smart, popular, extroverted etc etc) Sweetheart if a man just came up to you when you were upset and offered a flower and a moment to chat, you'd give him the ick and cry over by another bench. Men should be simple, it makes it all the easier to scout where the good women are and where they aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:41 PM
–

If a man isn't simple in defining what he wants in a woman, he's either gay or hiding it. As a male, I look for only two character traits in a woman, intelligence and self care. Whether they have big tits, are a virgin, blue eyed, blonde hair, trad, make 100k etc means nothing to me. If you have to equate a relationship with another human being as something akin to shopping for a new dress then do ALL MEN a favor and stay on the cock carousel.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:32 PM
12

You're attributing some seriously poor values onto women that don't really align well. Drama isn't something anyone truly wants and those that do, usually have a large red flag over their head.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:27 PM
–

Being simple is desperate to you? Honestly?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:24 PM
–

Good to know you admit sucking off dogs
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:22 PM
–

When it comes to something like a relationship? Absolutely. If you don't know what you want in one than think about it until you do. Otherwise, you end up leading people on, or toying with others, boarding the cock carousel etc until you hit 40 and then realize OH RIGHT I wanted this in someone and by then you'll be lucky to find one that ever hits that mark.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:21 PM
–

Well I hope your dog was happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:19 PM
–

Not at all, I respect smart women but disrespect those that don't deserve it. I've women friends, women enemies etc, but sexist? Not one I've ever been called.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:18 PM
–

U OK?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:17 PM
–

long list of standards That implies they don't know what they want. When I order a steak from a restaurant, I'm asked how would I like it cooked, I answer. A man asked what they want in a woman can be boiled down to about 2-3 things depending on culture, race, etc but usually no bigger. A woman however can prattle on about all sorts of standards and some subconsciously that they refuse to acknowledge but is hardwired into them by sociatal and media presence. Women don't know what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 06:16 PM
2

Buddy there's a whole subreddit about it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 05:46 PM
–

More women more often than not don't have a clue as to what they want out of a man whereby most men do. This is a sad state of affairs given the levels of promiscuous women in the world today and unfortunately it takes strong men to start denying women the satisfaction of the one thing they crave. Attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/24 05:45 PM
1

Why did you in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 03:22 PM
1

If you look at the people who sub to onlyfans (especially if they have an x) you'll find alot of them are Indians or aged 40-60 it's kind of funny really
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/24 12:35 PM
0

No lady I just don't care to listen to a woman who doesn't understand science.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 01:12 AM
0

The burden of proof lies on the ones claiming it to be true sunshine. Go ahead and give me a good journal JOURNAL that has posted your harlequin fantasy. Go ahead. My dms are open
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 01:08 AM
0

Again with this documented in science nonsense. Here's a stat for you, 80% of women prefer a 7 inch cock. You know how I know? Cause I tested it. Sound like science to you? How about you provide a source of your harlequin tomfoolery.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 01:04 AM
-1

Pair bonding is a pseudoscience, again no different than spouting off the idea that women retain the semen of other men they slept with and thus give birth to chimera babies. Harlequin science and you should feel silly for believing it without providing a source.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 12:57 AM
–

I'll set the bar then here. Women 35 and under, are more likely today to be openly promiscuous, openly engaged in sexual activity and flaunting themselves to be treated as such. After 35 it starts dropping off and hard. And buddy, I've been around a lot of women and I can attest to this fact there's a reason my account is a throwaway
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:12 PM
1

Lady your harlequin science doesn't make any sense otherwise divorce statistics would be on the floor, men and women would be prancing around everywhere like horny deer. Get a clue.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:09 PM
0

So no source other than "trust me bro" ok got it. You had a good thing then messed it up with your head logic but that's fine
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:07 PM
–

Define young.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:02 PM
0

That last bit is pure gibberish, nowhere is that true. Your first bit sure but the last is no different than arguing women who have sex with multiple partners retain the sperm and have chimera babies
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:01 PM
–

Maybe in your bubble but not in the circle I'm in
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 09:58 PM
–

Brah this is the #metoo era, men are taught nowadays to be ashamed of their desires, as well as their own masculinity and to allow women to be sexually promiscuous, blatantly derogatory, and utterly incapable of being wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 09:34 PM
–

Wait what? I'm not sure that's the norm anymore...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 09:03 PM
1

Big take here 👀👀
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 08:53 PM
1

What kind of equivalence is that? Do you have those numbers? I'm not arguing the idea that men who aren't circumcised don't get women I'm arguing that it's still a stereotype that they may feel insecure about it because of things like porn or social norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 08:52 PM
0

Holy shit. You're serious. Wow. At first was going to dismiss as trolling but you're actually dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 08:17 PM
0

You can view the sun as the moon my man but as far as SCIENCE says, you're wrong. Have a good day buddy
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 07:57 PM
1

My sexual organ is not in question here the topic is so that's strike one for you. Secondly, your falsely equating things that don't make sense. That's strike 2. And lastly, there are plenty of comments in here that provide the sources you can read yourself about damage etc. That's strike three.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:31 PM
0

Nope, just enjoy sparking fun debates and discussions while I work on random things.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:17 PM
0

I wouldn't know but if you read some of the comments you'll see there's some people who detail it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:17 PM
0

No one is arguing that. In fact, you are the standard by this topic and that means you are graced by the presence of the american lord and savior of aesthetic pleasure. Anyone else however is considered, as another poster put it, as "dog dick"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 06:00 PM
1

Oh I'm just curious now.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:58 PM
2

Then I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:55 PM
0

Seriously? I don't really need to ask lol I know that, I mean read the room fam, it's considered standard and anyone else is as one poster so eloquently put it "a dog dick" so just because YOU don't know the experience doesn't mean others do not and women especially can tell you the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:55 PM
1

The "not all skittles are the same color" argument only goes so far.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:34 PM
0

And that's fair right?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:25 PM
1

Idc how old you are, pornography does predate your experience. And unless you knew that woman personally and asked her why, it's hard to make anything other than conjecture.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:18 PM
2

I dont disagree that men should focus more solely on their own endeavors but to say they should swear it off entirely hints at the belief that even being actively pursued by a woman should be dismissed and that is a bit firm. (assuming you understand that's the implication)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:16 PM
0

Everything starts surface level, fam. Everything. So yes those standards exist and yes there are women (I've known a few) who have actively dropped men who weren't circumcised (American women mainly) and while callous it's what's considered "standard"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 05:15 PM
1

Re-tweet and +1
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:56 PM
-1

R/antinatalist would love you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:53 PM
2

This reminds me of the skittle analogy. Not all skittles are the same color or something like that
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:53 PM
0

Then if your man refused to go down on you in turn would you leave him?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:49 PM
2

I don't think anyone is arguing against the idea of medical necessity. My topic doesn't have it listed but I should have as I agree it should be a medically necessary procedure however, I've been in rooms with parents who have actively sought circumcision and been told the child has no medical need but remained firm. America and pornography in general, have perpetuated a STEREOTYPE that men must be circumcised to be desirable otherwise they are not. That is a problem and treating circumcision in…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:46 PM
3

So you see the truth. Women are inundated by pornography to a certain standard that uncircumcised men are undesirable and this perpetuates a STEREOTYPE. Would you go down on a male who was uncircumcised? Assume again they have no problem with going down on you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:40 PM
-2

Just checking.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:38 PM
1

But what about equality? Shouldn't you encourage your man to be opposed to an egregious assault on your child's body?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:38 PM
-4

Would you go down on a male who was uncircumcised? Assume they have no problem with going down on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:37 PM
0

If you were with a man who actively enjoyed pleasuring you through oral and who was uncircumcised would you go down on him?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 04:35 PM
4

Write to congress. As far as medicinal reasons (phimosis etc,) the practice should be done but at the behest of the person requesting it or by medical necessity. It should NEVER be done by parents who make the decision for the child, that's blatantly violating the autonomy and rights of the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 03:30 PM
27

👍Based mom
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 03:27 PM
5

Studies have proven that infants brain matter changes after circumcision and I can provide the source on this but am on mobile so a little lazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 03:27 PM
–

Retweet
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 10:08 PM
–

Never had that issue but I do know women who can't take a full 7 incher due to "pain" but they believe it's still hot. Go figure.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 09:43 PM
–

Are women size queens naturally? Or is it only fetishists?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 09:39 PM
0

No they aren't lol you're completely wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/24 09:26 PM
–

You're right I'm sorry let me redirect, more than 10000 academic papers in 2023 alone relying on statistics, survey's etc were retracted due to falsified and egregious fabrication. My point, don't rely solely on data.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 04:13 PM
1

Top 10%
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:24 PM
1

Same
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:24 PM
1

Disagree, social media such as reddit, Facebook, 4chan even are all necessary parts of a well developed modern community. No different than when in Rome they'd have forums for everyone to participate in. But dating apps? Unless you are paying a middle man to sort and sift through the garbage and find someone for you there's no reason for you to have to go on your own and do it especially when results, statistics, and experiences are showing that they do more harm than good and have for years.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:23 PM
2

Hinge is no different and already steeping into the same vein as tinder, it's a hook up app masquerading as quirky but it's still no different jsut check the subreddit for it and you'll see. OLD is no longer a viable way of meeting or dating people and in fact has become a pestilence and must be removed for men AND women to return to some level of normalcy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 02:20 PM
–

You're absolutely deluded my man
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 12:59 PM
–

Apart from porn, single moms will never EVER be an option to a guy unless the woman in question is offering to them everything under the sun to make it work. And yes, child abandonment is one of those things. Never date single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 01:59 AM
10

If all dating apps were banned, today - it would directly influence every aspect of sexual and societal gender issues almost overnight. I guarantee that. Dating apps have in a way "gamified" relationships and it has gone unregulated and unchecked for so long it has become a right of passage for some to actually achieve a relationship. Dating apps should be banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/24 01:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter