TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwaway917293 Archive

View 0 posts and 65 comments by throwaway917293 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

I am and I frequently make use of that right. Self-reflection is not everybody's cup of tea. In fact, it's mastered by only a very tiny percentage of people. You're not one of them AND that's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 07:25 PM
-1

I PROMISE you this is one of the most chill-moderated debate subs on this platform lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 07:19 PM
3

And this sub lets us do so without being too hyper moderated
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 06:17 PM
2

Why are you in this sub ? Good question – I don't know. I used to be in this sub to participate in stimulating and somewhat civil discussions. Nowadays, we have water-is-wet content that gets repeated by the week and yet is up-voted to the heavens. People, women in particular, have become increasingly hostile and unreasonable. For example, I used to appreciate a female user that goes/went by the name of 'sharp.engineering' (smth like that) but she turned to the dark side... And what make you sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 06:13 PM
2

It's a way of avoiding a forced vacation by the mods.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 12:51 PM
2

I don't like the label but I'm 'blackpill' in so far that I think that genes matter and they matter a lot, all aspects of life. I don't hate women, I don't want them to be killed and I don't want a society in which they don't have men like freedom and agency. also do black pill men think that a sociable and intelligent, but ugly man will get laid equally as much as a man who’s handsome but unintelligent and not sociable? Obviously, I can't speak for all of men who subscribe to BP belief but its …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:46 PM
2

i thought black pill men thought looks trump all? Rarely are things 100% clear but your initial take on this was that BP equals looks = everything. That's not sufficiently correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:23 PM
3

I'm not saying that you denied genes and how they interact with a person's qualities. What I claimed was that equating BP with 'looks are everything' is just a shallow view of what this is about. That's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:19 PM
3

you don't need to be a biology major to determine that traits such as intelligence or sociability are heavily influenced by genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:15 PM
3

they do, but it's still not what the BP is about, at least not in its entirety :) There's more to genes than just looks. Very interesting topic acutally.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:12 PM
0

DK is short for Dunning-Kruger. It's a reddit classic – read it up!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:06 PM
1

LMAO. DK in its full effect once again.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:04 PM
8

Never what the BP was about. BP = genes determine your life outcomes significantly; that's all.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:03 PM
-2

right, they want to selflessly! reward men who did the hard work and discipline. Divine angels sent to mankind.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:02 PM
-1

Both men and women want to be physically attracted to their partners. More breaking news at 4 It's was clearly implied or do we not speak the same language? AI generated text perhaps?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:59 PM

If you think THIS is a bad post relative to most other posts on ppd, you're either new here or cognitively very uniquely wired...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:51 PM
5

Women do want a good man, just not enough. Holy fuck the once in a year triple digit IQ post on PPD that isn't 'water is wet'. Insaaaaaaaaaane.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:48 PM
5

Are Women Really Overlooking Good Men—Or Are They Just Not There Just like men, women overlook the (morally) good not so attractive types. If you're both 'good' and attractive, you're off the market in the majority of cases. That's just how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 03:38 PM
-4

Oh, absolutely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:34 AM
20

Hot take for men struggling in dating: "Get better or get bitter". If you're bitter you don't really want it (or you are a bit cheap) and you should change your perspective My thoughts? I think you're very much on the wrong track asserting that most unsuccessful men are just egocentric and self-centered. Men who can't get women usually have a decent (not all-encompassing but sufficient) understanding of what it is that gets women exciting for men. Their problem is that often this is the opposite…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:33 AM
-6

I'm not spreading hate, not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:19 AM
1

I'm a European, mid 20s, 68th percentile income, relatively attractive, tall, and have 2-3 close friends. In other words, I'm not isolated, neither by friendship standards or inter-sex relationships. Yet what he says is factual – a big part of a woman's attraction towards a man is what he can provide for her and her (potential) offspring. This is not to slam on women. They are born that way, likely for a reason. It is what it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:34 AM
3

Right, but 'more' implies that there was always some degree of transaction between men and women. You just admitted it yourself...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:26 AM
1

dating nowadays is transactional For the vast majority of people, it was always like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:22 AM
1

Even if she's into his vibe and personality, that usually only comes into play after he's proven that he can provide some material things beneficial to the woman. There are women out there in the market that are in for sex and sex only. For these types, it doesn't matter whether you drive a Toyota or a Ferrari, or if you own a car at all. As long as you're handsome, you're good. Said type of women is vanishingly small though. All other types are hardwired (by their biology; they can't help it) t…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 09:19 AM

Definitely b).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:45 AM

It's b) then.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:44 AM
0

Am I wrong? Well, I answered that part already. I'm asking you why in one sentence you make it a women-only thing and in the next you go on to say that everyone would act that way. I don't understand that and am asking you to clarify it for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:43 AM

Well, it's either a) that my English is subpar or b) that we're dealing with intellectual shortcomings here. Guess we'll never know...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:41 AM

I'm not completely certain, but I'm fairly sure that at some point OP admitted to sleeping with men for a living, which definitely seems to come through in her writing.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:37 AM

A major flaw in that 'logic' of hers is that relationships are treated as power negotiations rather than mutual emotional investments. Tells you a lot about the woman in question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:32 AM
1

Harems are the preference In a free society, a coincidence of two needs to happen for a trade. Andrew Tate or Dan Bilzerian have a rotation of women at their home because a) the both of them like it that way and b) there are women willing to fulfill their desires if the conditions are met. Therefore, it's something that both (certain) men and (certain) women want otherwise there'd be no deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:24 AM
3

Hypergamy is natural, and women will look for the best option circumstantially. Here, you say this is a women thing. Why would anyone choose less for themselves unless they had no choice? Here, you say 'anyone' chooses the best they can which I'm inclined to believe is true. Do you mind explaining yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:20 AM
5

ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Grok, Gemini, and co, – what a time to be alive!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:12 AM
13

Women who dislike online dating: have you tried talking to less attractive men?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:02 PM
1

I mean it has always mattered waaaay more WHO the guy behind the steering wheel was rather than the car itself. If you're what women look for in men, you can be someone who sits on a $6,000 motorcycle. A man who sits in a $60,000 Mercedes or Audi will not be able to compete. Should be common sense by now – it's 2025 after all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 03:27 PM

Experience in bed is a downside for men, not an upside Completely out of touch with reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/25 07:44 PM
7

Well said - I very much agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 12:02 PM
23

Reasonable take that puts ethics and morals before desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 11:58 AM

This is fucking common sense, though...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:10 PM
3

Having read the headline only, I'll give it a 99,99% chance of it being an exceptionally stupid take...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 04:08 PM

Men are also exposed to reality TV, yet they their thresholds are vastly different from women's. We can control for environment (women and men being around the same/similar ads, tv shows, apps, etc.). What remains is the different biology. Women just aren't attracted to most men all that much and historically never were. What changed not too long ago is the necessity of forming a mostly economic union (marriage) that typically involved sex at least in the earlier stages. 100 years ago such an ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 12:12 AM

It's appropriate for weaklings who can't deal with reality and therefore make an attempt to equalize a suboptimal situation with an optimal situation - it's very much befitting imo. On top of that, they look very cute don't you think?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 12:03 AM

Right, but low and behold it's still a piece of shit used car from the 80s that sells for a certain (relatively low) price. A little paint won't change that significantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:57 PM

Logical fallacy. Just because plenty of men do it and it was the norm in the past doesn't mean it was good or beneficial for the sides involded. In Afghanistan, you can have sex with your woman at will, i.e., rape her. Plenty of men there do that and have done so in the past...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:55 PM

C O P E
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:52 PM

Sure there is: money, family, power, personality Oh, absolutely not. The relationship dynamics will be very different (as in worse for the man and I argue worse for the woman as well) when compared to a dynamic in which the woman is eager to be physically around and touched by the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:44 PM

Even if you wash a piece of shit car from the 80s, it's still a piece of shit car from the 80s that can not compete with a modern, perhaps less maintained Mercedes or Beamer. Customers will see the car for what it inherently is and if that's a piece of shit used car from the 80s than a car wash won't do much. It's not only about initial attraction, a modern Mercedes/Beamer has a higher value in the market than a piece of shit used car from the 80s. The key is to be aware of what type of car you …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:41 PM

if you're born ugly as a guy there's very little you can do to compensate You can get the fake thing for money even from hot and exclusive (they don't let everyone between their legs) women but it WILL never be the real thing. While important, there's more to sex than the mechanical friction of D rubbing against P. The inter-personal aspect of being wanted and desired is at least of equal importance and most (though not all, but most) guys who claim otherwise just can't cope with reality. Even i…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:32 PM

Nobody cares why when they're balls deep in a 9/10 Surely a man who has “invested” a few hundred dollars to land between the legs of a 9/10 is just as satisfied as a man who is in the same situation because he was desired for his looks, something that is innate to him/his persona. The amount of cope among "less competitive" men (to put it nicely) will never cease to amaze me.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 11:25 PM

I'll be honest I didn't read the text but if it is something along the lines of what follows, it's probably correct: Generally speaking, this is, of course, correct and follows as a logically necessary consequence of the inherent supply & demand discrepancy (men wanting women way more than vice versa). However, it should be noted that a selected group of in-demand men, I believe them to be around 5% of the total supply of men, regularly get approached by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:48 PM
1

The common belief is that through personality (e.g. charm) one can compensate his (lack of) looks. That's why club environments supposedly beat dating apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:28 PM
0

Correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:25 PM
1

The truth is that you can have standards and also voice them but women will not take it lightly if a man does it who, in their opinion, is unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:06 PM
2

Defeat? I mean of course, haha. You only criticized my method (being AI) when it became clear how gravely wrong you were in your claim. xd Vanity is all fine and dandy, but sometimes you have to take Ls otherwise it'll make you look bad, and since you're very much after keeping up the illusion of being right at all times (see username), you should really take the L here. No reason for you to further humiliate yourself. You have done so sufficiently already, my guy or gurl.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 11:46 PM
2

I very much appreciate the lack of input in sight of clear defeat. For the future, I would advise you not to be so dogged and to concentrate more on the essentials. This way, you get the most of out of argumentation and that's your goal after all, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 11:14 PM
2

Not me relying on AI Shifting topics because we were wrong? xd Sometimes you have to use artificial intelligence on people who suffer from Dunning-Kruger or similar mental clouding. The argument from authority is not the most elegant, but it usually works for people who make outrageous claims with minimal to poor reasoning and/or knowledge. I consider it a handy weapon of last resort for the really hard cases. Admittedly, you got me there. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:25 PM
2

I was asking a question that relates perfectly to our topic and that you have answered incorrectly as pointed out by AI, more specifically chatgpt. So no, you're clearly not smarter than AI.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:20 PM
1

Oh, absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:14 PM
2

Chatgpt: Q: Does this conclusion (A to previously asked Q on Chatgpt) imply that most people don't enjoy their work all that much? A: Yes, the conclusion does imply that most people don't enjoy their work enough to do it without pay. This aligns with broader findings about workplace satisfaction and motivation: Are we smarter than AI? :)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:13 PM
1

Also, quitting their current role does not mean doesn't enjoy work Of course it implies exactly that. If 8-9/10 would turn to their families or hobbies if they weren't paid for their work, that implies exactly that. Again, what chatgpt found implies empirical data, hence “study”. Are we still ignoring/misinterpreting what AI says?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:12 PM
3

You do realize that chatgpt doesn't agree with you? Did I not highlight it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:06 PM
3

Nope. Chatgpt: Q: how many people would keep working if it wouldn't pay them? A: While surveys suggest around 15-25% of people might continue working in their current roles without pay, the majority would likely stop or shift focus to unpaid endeavors like hobbies, volunteering, or family responsibilities. The decision often depends on intrinsic motivation, financial needs, and personal values.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 10:03 PM
3

Most people enjoy working Oh, is that so? How many people, according to your opinion, would get up and commute to work on a Monday morning if it wasn't for the corporate check at the end of each month? Most people enjoy food, shelter, and the likes which work provides them. Does it mean that they enjoy the work itself? In 99% of the cases not, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 09:57 PM
7

People shouldnt steal and rob. People should control themselves to not steal and rob. I think everyone can agree on that too. Your making a normative statement no one disagrees with, but it wont change society. The people that dont care, do as they see fit, whether you like it or not. That's apperently very hard to comprehend, especially for the gals that gather here. A real "toughy". OP was naive enough to assume that people on here have IQs in the tripple digits. Oh, was he wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 07:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter