TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwawayaccount8189 Archive

View 0 posts and 109 comments by throwawayaccount8189 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

Looks like slavery is back on the menu, booois.
/r/MensRights18/03/25 11:56 AM
7

Doesn't matter who created it, unless you want to victim-blame. "Oh, John is at fault here, because multiple decades ago, Bob set up the system. No, John wasn't even born back then, doesn't matter though, Bob set it up, so John is at fault. Why? Oh, because penis."
/r/MensRights17/03/25 04:05 PM
4

Ping me if you find the sources for that. Sounds like a fun rabbithole to dive into.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 09:03 PM
1

They would, if affordable on a wide scale. That's one reason why they'd be banned rather quickly, as the men who'd buy them no longer fit into point 3. of OP's post, "Part 3: The ultimatum with male gender roles."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/24 01:06 PM
2

No, they won't, because they will be banned before going mainstream. 'Reasonings' like "objectifying womens bodies", "male gaze fantasy" or whatever will be used as 'arguments' for banning them. Here's the thing though: male sex robots won't be banned, as they further "female empowerment" and "freedom from male enabled bodies" or whatever. Yes, I am fun at parties.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/24 12:38 AM
14

Sounds like that group was one of those perfect examples for "To the privileged, equality sounds like opression."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/12/24 08:20 AM
4

Court be like: *Logic has left the brains*
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 08:48 PM
3

I see the Mein Kampf indoctrination feminism got is working well. Replace their talk about men with literally any other group on this planet and they'd be, rightfully so, called neonazis. They're determining the worth of people based on fucking genes. History really does repeat itself.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/11/24 08:35 PM
3

I feel like it must be said, because we (people) too easily forget: Don't lose focus of yourself, your wishes, your desires, your dreams and aspirations either. Work as a team to accomplish happiness for the both of you. And for the love of gods; TALK WITH EACH OTHER! :D EDIT: Corrected "drams" to "dreams". The fuck is a "dram"?
/r/MensRights21/11/24 07:53 PM
7

It's like they don't realize they are ruining a life That's their entire point. They make false allegations in the hopes that it does ruin a life.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 07:40 PM
2

She 100% will, as the people on the sub-that-shall-not-be-named will 100% suggest it to her and feed her the "he did something wrong, you are a queen"-lines.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 03:02 PM
2

Even then, pushback is not okay. "A lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.". Even if OP had 20 items, who's to say he doesn't have somewhere to be rather quickly? If you push back because of a "No" to whether you can skip ahead in line, you are effectively saying that your time is more important than the time of a complete stranger. If a stranger obliges and lets you skip ahead; cool, nice gesture. If a stranger doesn't oblige and stays at their spot in line; …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/11/24 09:41 PM
46

People appear to have collectively forgot about the "down with male-only spaces! Women deserve entry into men-only spaces, too!" times, where any hint of something being filled with only, or mostly, men was immediately considered misogyny.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 03:40 PM
21

Not even moral standards. This is about legislation. > Doesnt that inherently go against the principles of equality? Welcome to waking up to the true nature of feminism. I suggest investigating legislations in most major developed countries. You'll come to realize that, whilst feminists like to claim "men have more rights than women", it is the other way around. Note that this doesn't apply to third world countries, where the rights of women are pretty much that of the stone age, i.e. none. Dulu…
/r/MensRights16/11/24 03:15 PM
9

Probably because it's a guy. Men bad, men patriarchy. As he was able to build a school and provide education, he must've been privileged, too. So we got the marks checked; male, power, privilege. Therefor, he bad.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 11:55 PM
4

Nah, not even close to "literally". Does anybody else enjoy watching transwomen expose some of the BS around women's sports? Every time a mediocre male athlete becomes a good female athlete I smile. Same reason I enjoy watching the US women's soccer team lose to retired 4th division men's players, Serena lose to a guy ranked in the 200s or the mixed gender track relay. Not a single mention of "beating" I think you're equating this to a high school bully bullying smaller kids. It's not that at al…
/r/MensRights15/11/24 11:51 PM
1

Horseshoe theory in action.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/24 08:02 PM
1

Still a flaw in your logic: Because some assholes think it's A-OK to do so, you take their behaviour as justification to do the very same, but call it good because you're only doing it "in revenge" or something, thus harming completely innocent people.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 07:29 PM
1

Your error is grouping together all men across the globe and making it a men-issue when fuckfaces, for example Putin, start wars. Thus expecting other men, like from Ukrain, to fight said wars. The issue with that logic is: You are making completely different and innocent people responsible for the actions of someone completely, again, different. You are not thinking about individuals. In your logic, men are a singular homogenous group, thus responsible for every action any single man ever has, …
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:25 AM
17

Wouldn't surprise me if the reverse was posted multiple times by different people without making stuff up, but it either got deleted or downvoted to hell and beyond.
/r/MensRights14/09/24 12:01 PM
21

It's good that you're finally starting to get an inkling on how modern western women are and that you are starting to understand part of the struggle of men, or in your case, masculinity. However, the way you got to this conclusion still troubles me: You had to make the experience yourself first, before coming to this realization. We are expected to show sympathy and empathy right from the get go, without going through the experience of a woman. We are expected to understand how women feel, expe…
/r/MensRights01/09/24 11:45 AM
1

Which sounds more like projection, when you take the in-group bias of women and compare it to the out-group bias of men.
/r/MensRights30/08/24 05:54 PM
3

It boils down to "<thing happens>, women most affected."
/r/MensRights29/08/24 11:41 AM
7

Remember: Guilty by association is okay when it's done by the Good Ones™
/r/MensRights28/08/24 09:24 PM
9

When male victims of any crime feminist say "by other men" That always struck as odd and confused me. When a member of a minority commits a crime, then it's not their fault, it were the circumstances, their childhood etc. When the victim is a woman, then she must be supported, she must be helped, and unless a man did it, then it is irrelevant who did the crime. When the victim is a man, then fuck him over thrice and call him pussy, he deserved it because he's a man. If the perpetrator was a man?…
/r/MensRights28/08/24 07:58 PM
8

You forgot "something something patriarchy" and "something something privilege" :D
/r/MensRights28/08/24 10:52 AM
2

When men do it, it's called "bare minimum" and as such, it is expected. When women do it, it's "stunning and brave and hard" and should be rewarded.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 04:57 PM
8

r/menkampf
/r/MensRights25/08/24 01:04 PM
5

So the fact that men have died in wars means there is no patriarchy? Not what I said nor implied. You brought in women dying for the cause in the past as some sort of argument in favor of the movement in the present. Any movement can become a perverted and lost cause over time. What about the woman from this story, whose abuser avoided punishment. Victim, through and through. The man who abused the laws should be punished and locked away forever. She deserves justice and compensation. Not sure w…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 02:47 PM
7

Women died protesting for the right to vote, for example. And men died protecting countries during wars, what else is new. I highly respect the men and women who fought and continue to fight the good fight. However, todays feminism is a toxic and sexist one which, evidently, is starting to hurt itself. If the men and women who fought and died for the cause in the past would see what their movement has been turned in to today, they'd probably commit suicide. Ironically, it is the feminist spaces …
/r/MensRights24/08/24 01:30 PM
8

So don't trust data, only Your personal experience. Ok, good to know Not what I said nor implied. The meaning behind the phrase is basically "never fully or blindly trust statistics." EDIT: "If feminists were able to think a couple of steps ahead" -- ok, rocky start. Hardly. Feminists always proclaim the existence of the patriarchy. If western civilization actually were ruled by a patriarchy, the laws would never have seen the light of day in the way they have. Feminists force the majority of la…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 12:43 PM
17

It's simply sexist laws at play. Making them gender neutral would have prevented this. Currently it is man-hating as men get the short end of the stick in terms of being able to be victims and getting justice for the crimes commited to them by women. With the precedent in this article set, women can now be negatively affected by the very laws feminist sought to be implemented. In a way, feminists hurt themself, again. If feminists were able to think a couple of steps ahead as well as not being s…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 12:07 PM
1

Because to them, it's a zero-sum-game. Meaning: If males get rights, it must therefor take away from womens rights. No, it doesn't make any sense, but then again, neither do the vaaaaast majority of feminist arguments. *shrug*
/r/MensRights23/08/24 02:54 PM
1

Nah, check my post history on this sub. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ehbb9z/comment/lg6bce2 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1e29zlx/comment/ld1dg96 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1e29zlx/comment/ld18ppu https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1e29zlx/comment/ld0oiq8 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1e1mjbk/comment/lcz4lpj https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1drf91m/comment/laz3mo4 etc. pp.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 10:15 AM
31

I see no issue here, really. The article mentions The researchers also found that menopausal women who regularly swim in cold water report significant improvements to their physical and mental symptoms, while the activity is also found to improve menstrual symptoms. and as far as I am concerned, it this does indeed help women, then go for it. It then goes on to say But the team warned there are risks that can be exacerbated by the swimming environment, including the increased likelihood of gastr…
/r/MensRights22/08/24 03:34 PM
2

Source your information from places other than reddit, too. If you are able to, then contact organizations in your area, or even outside your area. Reddit, whilst popular, is still only one of many places on the internet and not representative of either the MRA nor the feminist spaces and the people within those. People tend to behave differently when on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 03:21 PM
3

That has always been the M.O. of feminism. It's also the same rhetoric used by racists, xenophobes etc. etc. "Of course it's not all <group>, but it's enough of them!". It's always the same BS. :)
/r/MensRights02/08/24 05:53 PM
11

I know, I know, don't feed the trolls. Sometimes it's just too entertaining, though. :D
/r/MensRights13/07/24 08:13 PM
20

Shit, alright then, guess that makes it totally okay and fine then! Problem solved everyone: We are a homogenous group in constant exchange with each other. Every single male on this planet is responsible for every other male on this planet! Human being as individuals? NO MORE! By your own logic, your own mother would be responsible for the rapes which british teachers commit to young boys. You're putting ~4 billion people in the same box because penis.
/r/MensRights13/07/24 07:44 PM
32

Shit, alright then, guess that makes it totally okay and fine then! Problem solved everyone: If men are doing it, it's okay if other completely unrelated men are victims!
/r/MensRights13/07/24 05:41 PM
13

"Here's how this affects women."
/r/MensRights13/07/24 11:18 AM
1

Highway to shithole it is, then.
/r/MensRights30/06/24 03:11 PM
6

I honestly hope that they have a better plan than this if this is what it entails. That's the neat part, they don't! It's purely short-sighted and based on immediate satisfaction/pleasing/affirmation. The behaviour can somewhat be compared to the current state of capitalism and/or politics: It all revolves around getting things NOW and only personal gain is important, everyone else can get fucked in the process: "Fuck you, I got mine." The future is the problem of somebody else. The only thing w…
/r/MensRights30/06/24 01:26 PM
13

My hypothesis about what redfems want to achieve: Fill all comfortable, non-life threatening, non-backbreaking and generally not too taxing jobs with women, but ensure they get paid more regardless of what said job entails. Leave the rest, the grunt work, the dangerous, the life-threatening jobs to men, pay them less because "down with patriarchy!11!!".
/r/MensRights30/06/24 10:10 AM
1

Aye, it's always gonna be "something something women most affected."
/r/MensRights29/06/24 07:33 PM
5

There's also this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer It is one of the earlier cases now cited in U.S. child-support guidelines which say that in every case that has addressed the issue the court has decided that an underage boy is liable for the support of his child even when the conception was the result of criminal conduct by the mother. Can't make this shit up.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 07:03 PM
5

Wasn't there a case where a woman raped a boy, got pregnant, and then she sued for childsupport AND won? If I remember correctly the judge ruled that the guy had to start paying as soon as he turned 18. Something like this: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/09/02/statutory-rape-victim-child-support/14953965/
/r/MensRights29/06/24 07:00 PM
2

And at the same time, not to rarely say things like "Men will never understand women. You need to be a woman to understand what being a woman means" and then go "Yeah we understand how men work. No need to be a man to understand that. That other woman agreed, so we are right." Make it make sense.
/r/MensRights29/06/24 10:55 AM
7

My guess: She wanted the attention.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:47 PM
-1

Thing is... We don't know you. We don't know your wife. We don't know your typical behaviour. We don't know hers. *Might* be that this is just a thing she does, with no intentions. *Might* be that she does this because she has some sort of reason. From this little snippet alone nobdy should make any bold judgements, really. If she, personally, never really liked being introduced then it makes sense she wouldn't do that with others. "Don't do unto others what you don't want done unto you." comes …
/r/MensRights17/06/24 05:45 PM
3

It's an example for why radical feminism is a cult. It's a very effective brainwashing technique. You take all the problems most women have encountered, do encounter, or struggle with, create one evil overbearing boogey man and explain to them that this boogey man is the source of all their problems and the source of all evil in this world. Sprinkle in some examples where said boogey man is indeed reponsible for said problems and said evil and you link the two together. BAM, you created the arch…
/r/MensRights15/06/24 03:51 PM
17

I genuinely wonder why radfems aren't delighted at the prospect of joining the military. Free pass on killing men, a.k.a. your "enemies". I thought #KillAllMen was a thing they worshipped.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 03:19 PM
3

Before you know it, a guy popping a boner in his youth unintendedly is sexual assault. Don't give them ideas!
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:43 AM
13

Got physically abused by a woman in kindergarten. Nobody gave a fuck. "Take it like a man" I was told Got sexually abused in elementary school by a female teacher. "She was just caring for you" I was told. Got drugged and raped by the age of 18 by a teenager. Got told "You must have lilked it, otherwise you would not have had an erection".
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:40 AM
1

We were talking about being rebellious and whether kids have space for it to discover their own self, and you jumped to discerning between right and wrong and obeying the law. Also this isn't a really single mother thing I never said otherwhise. It would be common sense to change your behavior if a certain behavior is not giving you the outcome you want. Simple. This assumes these thought-processes had time to grow and the kid in question grew up in a healthy environment where they were allowed …
/r/MensRights15/06/24 10:37 AM
3

"Raising awareness for abused men will only hurt female victims." And they never give a good reason why or how. They are doing the exact same thing they proclaim to hate. "Victims must be heard! Do not silence them! Speak up!" ..... "Oh but only if vagina."
/r/MensRights15/06/24 09:09 AM
2

I wrote an email to the Bundeswehr, asking them how they justify this before the Grundgesetz, especially article 3. Sadly, I was only able to find a more general mail for the BW on their website. For those interested or in case you would like to copy paste: Moin sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bin vor kurzem über den Artikel bezüglich des Vorschlags für den neuen Wehrdienst bzw. die neue Wehrpflicht gestoßen. Ansich begrüße ich die re-aktivierung der Wehrpflicht, jedoch gibt es zwei Passagen,…
/r/MensRights13/06/24 06:02 PM
2

I'd agree with you if not for the following: kids/teens/adults are naturally rebellious by nature to test if their parent/ people /Leaders teaching is solid or not to find their own identity without them. This MIGHT hold true IF kids and teens get the room and time to even BE rebellious. I experienced it myself. I hardly got to be rebellious. Anything I tried to do which went against my orders was immediately shut down. So, yeah.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:31 PM
2

No man *should* object. Let's not forget that there are serious nutjobs out there. :D
/r/MensRights10/06/24 07:43 PM
4

Either draft everyone, regardless of sex, gender, whatever, or nobody at all. I'd prefer nobody, but I do realize a country must be able to defend itself against agressors.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 07:30 PM
-1

It would be *a* solution, but not the best solution. Men would give their life, women would give life. I'd prefer neither, but equality gotta equality. If men have to risk their lifes, then women must do the same, otherwise it's just sexism.
/r/MensRights10/06/24 07:23 PM
19

The headline translates to: "Due to radical feminists, an increasing number of women are lonely and unable to find a partner in later years. So here's how men can fix our mistake. Added bonus if infantilizing men in general."
/r/MensRights05/06/24 05:22 PM
1

Let's not forget this sentiment of "And we cannot ignore that they did not make these choices alone. They followed the mandates culture gave them, and they were doing what they believed to be the right thing at the time." doesn't hold true when men are involved. It's good that this sentiment doesn't hold true when men are involved, as we should be critical of our own behaviour, no matter what the current "culture" is, because just because something is part of a "culture" doesn't make it right no…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 06:25 PM
0

That's in no way what they said or implied. It's a simple fact that many/lots/loads of men are raising children which aren't biologically theirs. Look up "acceptance of Parental responsibilities". There are laws in some countries which make the man the defacto parent of a child just for living together with the woman and her child, and he's fucked if he tries to fight it. That and other laws which prevent the man from proving no biological relation to the child because the woman can deny a pater…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 05:51 PM
1

I guess they....cantsaytheydidnttry. Sorry, had to. 😅
/r/MensRights26/05/24 05:38 PM
5

That's a disingenuous repsonse. You're trying to shift attention from the bad and ugly modern feminism has brought upon with your last question. It's a "but it's done so much good in the past! Think of the good it did." Thing is, it is irrelevant if the system or organization did good in the past when the present is toxic and vile. It makes no sense to defend a system which is actively driving a wedge between people and building anger and hate towards men, just because "but in the past".
/r/MensRights26/05/24 05:20 PM
11

Ah, it's the generalization of people based on their sex again, otherwise known as sexism. "In the past, people with penises did bad things. So you, who has a penis, too, are responsible for that. No, it does not matter that you had no play in what the others did, you are guilty by association, you get the blame, and you are responsible for making things better for us. Let us have our revenge on innocent people."
/r/MensRights26/05/24 01:41 PM
1

Yeah that's the one. Sorry! 😅
/r/MensRights21/05/24 05:58 PM
3

Obviously he does want to help them. Have you read the post and any of his comments? He's worked up an article to highlight various health issues with men, despite a toxic workplace. With that action alone, he's done more than most people here have. Rome wasn't build in one day. Your attitude is harmful and disrespectul to the work he's done and doing. Not talking or bringing up topic "X" or "Y" doesn't devalue the rest of his work.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 08:07 PM
4

Emotional control, taking you hostage via threats of possible repercussions should you deviate from a self-centered demand.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 07:49 PM
1

Their argument is that this campaign draws a "false equivalence", as "violence against men is not systemic, structural and pervasive" like violence against women. Oh the irony. Men want to create opportunities to help each other, to spread awareness, to prevent suffering. Feminists involve shitstorms, use their government funding, and involve the government directly in efforts to shut these Men's help groups and opportunities down. Thus proving that it is indeed "systemic, structural and pervasi…
/r/MensRights20/05/24 04:17 PM
1

Feminists: "We need more women pursuing higher educations!" Feminists: "We need special programs only for women!" Education: Decline in men, rise in women Education: Weight of men in debt vs women in debt shifts to more women in debt Eductaion: Men are pushed out of higher education. Preferences for women are put into place. Men: "Imma go into trade and earn money instead of higher education" Feminists: "EVIL MEN RUINED EDUCATION FOR WOMEN MYSOGINY WAAAAAAAAAH" That about sums it up, I think.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 05:47 PM
3

Agreed. I read a couple dozens of the comments there. I've got a feeling that this is a case of such a bot-farm in action, reasoning: the comments all sound very similar to each other generic usernames generic profile pictures very similar comments done by separate accounts with generic usernames and profile pictures (combintaion of all of the above) Now, does that mean that all of the comments are fake? No, it doesn't. Just as with any bot-spam, there are a couple of examples which are probably…
/r/MensRights01/04/24 02:17 PM
1

Live Love Laugh ?
/r/MensRights09/03/24 09:27 PM
1

I wonder. Does the UK have similar laws preventing men from leaving in case of a war like Ukraine? If so, your last sentence is theoretically possible. Be in a constant state of war = men aren't allowed to leave. Yeah, sounds paranoid, I know.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:25 AM
3

Something something PATRIARCHY
/r/MensRights08/12/22 05:49 AM
1

I can sympathize with that as well. At the same time, though, this fear does not allow for generalization based on which organs are swinging, or not swinging, between your legs. It is dangerous, solves no problems and only furthers the divide between men and women. In the long run, it creates a sphere of irrational hatred and fear crushing down on the lifes of mainly innocents. The real culprits, those who actually commit the attrocities for which men/women get blamed for as a whole, they will j…
/r/MensRights28/11/22 07:45 AM
33

Problematic for extremists like the author. Any attention taken away, or not spent on feminism is problematic.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 05:56 AM
2

You sure you answered the correct person here? I agreed with you and highlighted how the other person is arguing in bad faith.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 11:19 AM
0

It does, because you're focusing more on your interpretation and emotional state, and treating your interpretation of what others say as if they actually said that. You're forcing what's in your mind onto what others say, thereby twisting their words and using emotion-based arguments which hold no merit and do not contribute to the conversation at hand.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 09:58 AM
2

Nobody said to only have male leaders. You're consitently ignoring the points the other commenters make.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 09:52 AM
1

Whataboutism.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 09:50 AM
1

I don't know why someone would unironically argue for only men to be in power lol. Noone in this comment chain did that.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 09:49 AM
2

Yeah, people are weird.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 04:41 PM
2

Because whilst they have similarities or parallels, or even concern the same topic, they are conpletely independant of each other. It's the same as saying "There are starving children in africa! How dare you not care!" when someone says they're starving.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 04:40 PM
2

Whataboutism. These two cases have nothing to do with each other.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 10:41 AM
6

Meh. It's not a competition and her life has no effect on mine and vice versa. As long as she gets out of the abusive relationship and the guy gets punished accordingly, all is well that ends well. Personally, I wish her good luck. Wouldn't want to trade places with her for all the money in the world, knowing and having experienced abuse myself.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 10:40 AM
3

She is a millionaire She is a young attractive white woman Her life is probably better than yours or mine. Well, consideing my partner isn't threatening me or forcing me to create any content like she is being to, I'd hazard a guess and say: No. Her life is probably not better than mine.
/r/MensRights17/10/22 09:38 AM
7

OH MY GOD ITS NOT FUCKING RACISM TO <NOT> WANT TO BE RAPED OR ASSAULTED!!!!! Like I do get y'all's frustration. It sucks that you blacks have to pay for what other assholes do to us. But we can't tell who is which, right? Like you could be great, or a rapist/ax murderer. WE DONT KNOW. We don't hate you. We don't WANT to fear you. But OMFG we have NO CHOICE. WHY can't you see that?? I'm pretty tipsy but omfg it kills me reading these posts where it's like you people DELIBERATELY fucking misunders…
/r/MensRights15/10/22 08:27 AM
11

False accusations?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:53 PM
9

Nice try at whataboutism. We're talking about a male victim of domestic violence. Look at it this way: When women talk about their experiences and a man comes along and says "bUt wHaT aBoUt mEn??!!1!1", you, rightfully so, tell him to shut up. Now here you are, doing the exact same thing women complain about when men do it. Double morals, is what that is. Don't do that. Not a good look. It only furthers the divide between men and women.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 07:39 AM
1

(Born) babies, mentally challenged individuals, prematures, etc. These weird roundabout thought processes are negative to the pro abortion arguments. I mean, not really. You said so yourself: (Born) Which they haven't, because they're still in the womb. :D
/r/MensRights02/07/22 08:37 AM
0

what or where is the difference between the mother's body and the baby's body? One is a fully functioning human which can survive on its own, is able to comprehend, react to and interpret life around them along with self awareness and much more. The other is not.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 04:54 AM
2

Op didn't say it was caused by women. Try again.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 04:51 AM
3

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions." Preface: "you" as in the general "you". Not you, the OP. Yeah, sure, your reason for excluding some because of their race, ethnicity, gender, sex, or lack of disabilities may be to increase representation, but the outcome is the same as with any other racist, sexist, supremacist you name it: You're being a sexist, racist, supremacist. You're not hiring people based on their skill or ability to contribute to the position/field at hand. You're choo…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:28 PM
11

It's harassment, unwanted, and it's worthy of a punch in the face. Staring justifies physical violence/assault? You need help.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 09:12 PM
0

Moderate your own browsing. This sounds harsh, but it is your responsibility to not consume things which may, at times, be detrimental to your mental health. Yes, the things which happen in real life can hurt. No, nobody is obligated to moderate, control or censor things to your liking. Truth hurts, and some things need to be said innorder to raise awareness. Take a break once in a while, or visit another subreddit. Not meant to be rude. More meant as advice.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 04:45 AM
26

Being forced to fight in a war you don't want, because you happened to be born with a penis, risking being killed, is the same as not being forced to fight and continuing to live?
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:21 PM
18

From the top of my hat: We teach girls very early on that boys and men are pigs who are only interested in their body. We teach them that all men are sex-addicted beasts who might rape and kidnapp them at any moment. We teach them that they are always the victim, never to be blamed, even if they are the ones doing wrong. They are always right. We teach them that they are princesses deserving of their own prince Charming who will bend the world to fit her needs. We teach them that no matter what,…
/r/MensRights17/02/22 07:35 AM
0

I don’t understand this new fad of refusing to take ownership of your mistakes. By shifting the blame and the responsibility, you yourself are no longer in the "need" to do anything yourself. You can call out everyone else for your wrongdoings and feel temporarily better about yourself. It can also give some people a sense of power, by declaring other people as the responsible ones, thus trying to force them to take some form of action. Though in this case: If she truly is a nymphomaniac, then y…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 06:27 AM
18

Don't forget: A woman commits a henious crime. Society: "Well, she must have had a good reason. We should show empathy and try to sympathize. A man commits a crime. Society: "Off you fuck."
/r/MensRights16/01/22 08:26 AM
3

"If it doesn't fit my worldview, if it even challenges my wordview, it's an attack." Discussions are dying out. There's no context anymore. Everything is being pushed into extremes as you are either "with" a given group/ideology, or "against" them. No middleground to be had. Humanity is fucked.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 08:24 AM
5

They do know, they just don't want any attention drawn to anything else other than them.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 10:25 AM
1

It is self defense when they hit first, otherwise yeah I agree.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 09:24 PM
3

It's not eye for an eye, it's self defense. If someone hits you, with the intent to hurt you, you should defend yourself. No matter the gender, age, race, whatever. Otherwise, if you just take it and let them assault you, you teach them they can and will get away with it. Actions have consequences.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 06:00 AM
2

It’s for hygiene and pleasure. Cutting part of their body instead of being a good parent and teaching them how to properly clean themselve is extreme. I shower regularly, take good care of my hygeene, never had any problem whatsoever. And if I one day do, I go to a doctor and get it checked. Regarding pleasure I've heard mixed accounts. Many where people say their sensitivity has decreased over the years, due to being mutilated as a baby. Some who say that it hasn't impacted them at all. So, con…
/r/MensRights27/11/21 11:59 PM
4

So, we should mutilate new borns because later down the line he may be straight and in order to cater to womens taste in how a penis looks, he needs to change and cut part of his body off. Yeah, makes total sense.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 08:48 AM
2

So, she apologized because her revenge backfired? Yeah, that's not an apology, that's damage control on her part.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 11:56 AM
1

but in order to not conflate ourselves with feminist who stariotype men and women (such as you have by calling men more friendly) Please quote where OP said men are more friendly, specifically where OP said men are more friendly than women.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 11:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter