TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwaweight1234 Archive

View 3 posts and 47 comments by throwaweight1234 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

I for one find it very interesting how a person (defined as either a woman or a man) is responsible for their actions when they get behind a wheel while being intoxicated. But when they drink, then come on to another person saying "I want to have sex with you", and suddenly the responsibility rests solely on the other person's shoulders.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:10 AM
1

That was funny! cake for me too please! LOL.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:37 AM
7

We have to send a clear and consice message. Lets start off by explaining what we promote.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 02:25 AM
2

Then they ask you to donate as an alumni, and instead of getting better professors (here in North America), they give free muffin days, or free cupcake days (all payed (staff, food, security) by the university)).
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:20 AM
2

This is genius. Sheer genius.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 01:00 AM
1

That makes sense. Would you be able to say how they would have a greater chance of losing their child if they aren't married? Keeping in mind that they are still the biological parent.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:54 AM
1

Well, a little more than saying that he had a girlfriend would help. My mind isn't made up. The thing is, people usually go to these places even though they have a girlfriend.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:52 AM
3

Go to clubs much lately? There are way too many guys. They can pick as they please. Anyways, it's not even about being laid, its the fact that they could probably make out with 10 guys at a club if they wanted to. They could probably even satisfy themselves on the knowledge that guys hit on them. This rarely happens to guys. Although, your comment is pretty funny!
/r/MensRights24/08/12 12:49 AM
0

it says: "The man said he told "Yo Yo" that he had a girlfriend"
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:25 PM
0

He didn't consent to sex He didn't consent to anything according to the article, all he consented to was a massage, and he may or may not have consented to a handjob or another sexual act. We simply don't know. Because the article doesn't specify what type of sexual act it was, and what completing the sexual act entails, we can make some assumptions. 1) 99% of "happy endings" are a handjob followed by an ejaculation. 2) If he got a handjob, but is suddenly upset that he didn't consent to ejacula…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 10:03 PM
1

Would you be able to explain it, I think many people here don't really understand the concept of not being able to say no. Myself included.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:58 PM
0

We'll see, the supreme court is still deciding since January.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:56 PM
6

I would agree with jeff, if a woman wants to get laid, usually she can get laid that night without a problem.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:55 PM
0

Move to Quebec, don't marry, enjoy no spousal support, no division of assets, and only child support if you have a child with the person. Actually, that's the norm right now. I certainly wouldn't take someone that I didn't want, and they wouldn't have to take me if they didn't want. Unless we don't live in Quebec, then "yer screwed".
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:49 PM
0

Move to Quebec, don't marry, enjoy no spousal support, no division of assets, and only child support if you have a child with the person.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:47 PM
5

And I'd be happy with an impartial court system. Dreams, dreams.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:40 PM
4

1) Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) is just as bad as Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). The parents should not be allowed to make the decision that their child should be mutilated, unless required for medical reasons.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:36 PM
2

Her story makes no sense. I am struggling to read it.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:33 PM
3

Yep, that's what I got. But that line is so good for them that it's more like getting a fortune cookie in a cake, which is inside of a wedding cake, inside of a court where the judge favors women.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:31 PM
3

and didn't need a government form or a priest saying a magic spell over us to know that Love that quote. Although I do have an issue with the fact that to make a relationship official, you must marry. I don't see it like that in my books. I can be with someone forever without marrying and it would still be official in my books.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:13 PM
0

Agreed, there is no good reason, and it shouldn't matter anyways. In that case it would be assault. My money is on him getting a handjob and then being upset about the fact that he released.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:11 PM
1

More like Cake. They love it.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:09 PM
17

Plan making is an excruciatingly hard task. Do not underestimate the grueling hours of sweat, tears, and blood poured into saying "I think we should go to the Jamaican place for lunch".
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:07 PM
-5

I think that she just wants men to add value to the lives of their girlfriends instead of burden them. Although she miserably fails at explaining exactly how men can add value to the lives of their girlfriends, and how exactly men are being a burden. She does however succeed at throwing around the point that men are a burden, cannot add value to their girlfriend's lives, and should make fewer demands. She does have the right to demand everything and expect to give nothing in return. Men have the…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 09:04 PM
1

I must have read your comment wrong. I somehow read it that I thought you were calling her racist for that specific instance, now I see that it could apply to the past as well. My mistake.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:43 PM
0

Men can get visitation rights in Canada, and would have to pay child support in any province. But it goes the same way for the Woman.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:40 PM
0

I'd love to discuss this in detail, do you have any case studies or court cases to divulge into this issue? I'm going to try and find some.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:38 PM
0

Actually it's not a sweet deal for anyone. Everyone has the right to do what they want. Men don't have to give women resources or the status. Women don't necessarily have to ego-stroke, clean up, and make plans for men. It's always an equal deal for everyone. You choose what you want, and the other person chooses what they want as well. If she won't do those things, and you require them, it's pretty simple: don't choose to be with her.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:36 PM
5

It's an opinion piece by Amanda Marcotte; she can have her own opinion. But that's just it, HER opinion, everyone's entitled to one. The problem that I do have with her opinion is that she says that the best place to start is with fixing men. But she doesn't specify what demands men should not make. She just says: "fewer demands". I bet this really connects with her readers, they can take that to mean anything that they don't like. She says what women are traditionally expected to spend a great …
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:31 PM
10

I completely agree with this. Most women that I meet are not even date-able in my books.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:26 PM
2

She wouldn't be a racist. Race is for ethnicity, gender is sex. So it would make more sense to change racist to sexist for your opinion.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:25 PM
0

Your right. What I'm saying is that if he was content with getting a handjob (example), then he should not be suing for ejaculating. If he was not content with any touching around the private area, then I don't have a problem with what is happening.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 08:20 PM
-3

That is the only defense his case. She touched his penis, and he ejaculated. The ejaculation must have been immediate, unless there are other extenuating circumstances. We can't argue a case that we don't know the specifics of. But if we were to argue it, I would say that because the article did not sensationalize the fact that she touched him and he immediately ejaculated, he ejaculated after a short period of time in which he could have rejected the treatment.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:57 PM
-1

but she completed the sex act. So the massage provider started the sex act, and he had no problem with it. Then he ejaculated, and suddenly its rape? He consented to the massage, but he did not consent to ejaculating. Seems a little bit strange. I consent to taking off on a plane, but I do not consent to landing. Well.. what did he think would happen after she got him going?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:52 PM
-1

From what I understand, because the father and mother are on the birth certificate, they are equal.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:44 PM
4

Great post! This is what I've gathered from it: • Tax breaks • Tax free transition of estate upon death to spouse • Tax breaks from transferring assets • Power of Attorney [countered by drafting it yourself] Veteran benefits • Can't get married couples to talk against themselves in court Look at all those pros for married couples. How can we get around it? Is the only way to change the law?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:23 PM
1

Not always, take a look at Quebec (Canadian province). If you want the "perks" of marriage, you can get married. If you don't get married, then you are just two human beings, and upon the end of the relationship, you both go your separate ways with no spousal support or any obligations (there are some laws about what happens when someone you were going to marry dies, but that's as far as I've dug into it). When kids enter the equation, it gets a little bit trickier, but from what I understand, a…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:16 PM
1

What happens to some common-law relationships, is that they get marriage imposed on them after surpassing a certain amount of time. In the eyes of the law, they are treated as a married couple. So it gets very complicated because sometimes they get only some of the legal responsibilities of being married, etc. For the purpose of this discussion, I take a common law relationship to mean what Quebec (Canadian province) takes it to mean. A relationship with two people in it. And in this case, there…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:14 PM
3

The first thing I have to say is what does marriage have to do with procreating? Can people not procreate without the institution of marriage? I also really don't understand why you need marriage to have children. What benefits does marriage bring to children as opposed to being with the same exact person, in the same exact relationship, but without a signed marriage contract. I hate to break it to you, but a prenup means nothing right now. Judges throw these things out of court so much that the…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 07:01 PM
6

There will never, ever be a time where marriage can be considered a safe form of a relationship. Just look at what happened to prenups. You could have followed the law to the letter, and had the president be a witness to your prenup at the time you signed it. And yet if you look around right now, those same prenups may get tossed out of court on a judge's whim. While you are married, any of the laws could change towards married people, and leave un-married people unaffected. To me, this is extre…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:56 PM
4

So: Two biological parents that are married > two biological parents that are in a common law relationship. How would the first make it easier?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:45 PM
1

Out of all of the issues that exist, this is the one that bothers you? I also hold the opinion that women shouldn't cry, does that make me evil? No it makes me a person with an opinion, I really don't care and treat everyone the same anyways. So even if this wasn't in character, and it didn't include Hollywood, I would still leave it alone.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:29 PM
19

I guess so, I mean if you really wanted to get on her nerves, you could just walk into the Woman's Center saying that you identify yourself as a woman.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:24 PM
1

It's a very delicate issue. What stops women from drinking and smoking during pregnancy. Not much legally. Second of all, do you think that the amount of recklessness would increase if the mother would know that her child (when born) will be given to the male she raped? On the one hand it's fair to give the male rape victim the child, on the other hand, there are a lot of consequences from doing this.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:16 PM
3

I'm sorry but I really don't understand why you would kick out a female from the lounge. How can we change things if we reinforce the confirmation bias that exists towards men?
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:14 PM
28

Her demeanor towards you and the Woman's Center are mutually exclusive things. I would approach them separately. Deal with her attitude towards you by bringing it up with the appropriate people (I would first come up to her and say that what she said was very offensive towards you and what you stand for and it crossed the line. I would explain to her what you stand for and see how she responds. I believe an apology would be sufficient from her). Make sure you find out what the Woman's Center doe…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:12 PM
35

First of all, you don't have to pay anything you are not required to. That's called a choice. Is this a mandatory fee? Second of all, you have the right to petition your university to have a Men's Center. And thirdly: "the campus men's center is called the faculty lounge, ass" Please bring this up to someone. Most universities have a harassment and discrimination center or something of the sort. It is not illegal to say that, but it is certainly immoral. Universities care about that sort of thin…
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter