TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throway4mensrights Archive

View 0 posts and 8 comments by throway4mensrights on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It seems you really want to beg the case, which is fine. I don't really care to engage after this as it's pretty apparent that you have a tightly closed mind and because you keep countering with straw man fallacies. Because the above mentioned items are grossly sexist, gender unequal >issues where in Feminism has either directly or indirectly had a hand in >the result in spite of the fact that Feminism asserts itself as an >equality for all movement. If your movement claims the moral highground …
/r/MensRights20/12/10 01:29 PM
1

i'm not flame_away. i am a random reader who subscribes to this subreddit. and it's inconsequential that i'm getting many downvotes because they don't matter. by all means point out something illogical and i will tell you why you are wrong. i'm not really getting downvoted much except when i stated my opinion that the actual example that the op was referring to does not really matter. and think it through, why would it? let us play devil's advocate and assume he made it up entirely - does it pro…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 01:31 AM
2

if you're speaking in terms of practicality and historical precedent, why would feminism address what is wrong with any of the above? they have had to fight for gender inequality from the other side (for women's rights) since the inception and still have a lot more to do worldwide. it makes more sense for them to continue what they are doing right. besides if they've had a hand in the items you listed i doubt very much that the intent was not to harm men in general and rather to protect and prom…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 01:16 AM
-2

there may be some truth to what you are saying, but maintaining the other party as one's opponent is a sure way to keep them from seeing one's side of the story or be able to sympathize. it can be therapeutic to vent, but anger and an us vs them mob mentality can't be effective in making progress.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 08:01 PM
1

it definitely happens, and has happened to me, hence my shiny new throw away
/r/MensRights19/12/10 05:47 PM
-6

the actual example is of little consequence. i don't get why people are focusing on it. he explained that it was more of a last straw situation anyway and that single point has little bearing on the validity of his argument
/r/MensRights19/12/10 05:36 PM
0

clearly this is not the place for dissenting opinions or rational discussion, at least that's the indication i get from the most vocal commentors. i mean seriously, you are getting downvotes for responding rationally to childish criticism by someone who apparently has no logical basis to stand on. and i'm betting i'll get some nice dv's too
/r/MensRights19/12/10 05:25 PM
-2

for the most part i feel the same and have somewhat of a similar background, though not as extensive. i thought the idea for this subreddit had a lot of potential, but that in actuality it falls far short due to many (or the most vocal anyway) people not really being rational with most arguments and counterarguments. there is very much an "us vs them" dynamic here. feminism by many mainstream definitions is simply the striving for equality in gender identification and is in theory, by no means, …
/r/MensRights19/12/10 05:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter