~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"Care to expound more on why it shouldn't be be implemented? I'm very interested in male birth control options for obvious reasons, but I'd like to advocate for both of these. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 01:11 PM |
| 8 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"For what it's worth, the reversal rates of success... aren't good. It's on the list of things to figure out by 30 lol | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:42 AM |
| 1 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I don't really understand what you want from me at this point. I'm not trying to imply the internet happens somewhere outside of reality, just that the literal number of people of extremists is generally outweighed by people who don't care. I've found my quality of life goes down a lot if I treat everyone like they could be another crazy person I see on the internet. Maybe that's just a coping mechanism for me but it's worked out well - either the crazies hide themselves well, or they aren't lur… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:41 AM |
| 9 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"When we criticize feminism here, it is almost exclusively the ideology practiced by feminists in positions of power: in politics, academia, and mass media (including social media influencers). Criticizing feminism is criticizing an ideology, which people can choose to identify with or not. Generalizing all feminists would be bad, and not something we support. I understand the difference you posed but it's not what I was trying to describe. These statements are very nearly in contradiction with e… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:36 AM |
| 0 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I think we've reached the point where we agree to disagree haha. I understand your frustration but in my experiences the people I meet in real life tend to be very moderate, even their drunken political hot takes. That being said, I don't live in a particularly liberal area so I can see how someone's experience might differ. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:26 AM |
| 5 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I'm not sure I catch the incentive here but I'd love to hear more | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:24 AM |
| 9 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"There are some caveats there because Safe Haven laws are very time limited and not equally enforced or on the books everywhere. But still, they are prevalent and it's mind boggling to me that MensLib mods beat a dead horse about it not being comparable to abortion when we already understood that. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:23 AM |
| 4 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"As far as I can tell, most of the reasoning behind not allowing men to surrender a child is because that child has the legal right to parental support. Men and women are legally required to pay child support even if they are not involved in their child's life - meaning that in essence, the only legal support required of a parent is financial. What MensLib is arguing is that if a child is born, the father should be required to pay this support (rather than being given an option to surrender the c… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:21 AM |
| 1 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I'd concede that the distribution may not be as clear, but I fundamentally disagree that what is seen on the internet is representative of society as a whole. It is representative of a single facet of society: the terminally online. The numbers just don't back up an idea that most of the people we meet are political or social extremists in disguise. Not to say they don't exist - I've had more than my fair share of Trump apologists confess their hidden right wing attitudes to me - but there's a m… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:11 AM |
| 3 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I think we are generally in agreement, any belief I oppose to what you've written gets into nitpicky minutia which is unproductive at best. Your last two paragraphs are pretty interesting to me. I would wholeheartedly agree with you that an egalitarian approach is what we need... but I'm cynical as far as thinking we will get it. I'm genuinely curious on this as those paragraphs also got me thinking... do you think there's any chance in the modern day of a "second feminism" movement arising? The… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 05:05 AM |
| 3 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"For what it's worth, I'm looking at it from the perspective of numbers and not masks. I've met people that went full mask-off with their beliefs, I know they are out there. It's more so out of a hundred people I'll meet 96 more-or-less-moderates and two radicals from each side of the spectrum. I mean, that's the whole reason it seems like everyone online votes in elections but only 30% of the population votes in any given US presidency. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 02:37 AM |
| 2 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I think we can agree there's a lot of misandry in those movements as well, I didn't mean to paint them as perfect and of course hindsight is 20/20... but I think it would be helpful to make sure we're on the same page on the "laying blame" thing. I don't fully disagree with you because I agree it wasn't some conspiracy, but watching enough media from the 1920s to the 1950s definitely shows that it was in vogue for a decent chunk of recent history to view women as "simpler" than men. I think it's… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 02:31 AM |
| 7 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I don't really know. Well, actually I do. I have the worst time trusting myself. I can never fully convince myself I wouldn't want kids in every scenario that could possibly happen to me. It's also why I can't get a tattoo - I can never be sure I'll get something I won't hate 10 years down the line. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 01:51 AM |
| 5 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I know this sub has a good stance on women's rights but this is an amusing reply. I'll just play devils advocate and say that what you've done is indicate that users should just "know" who is being criticized similar to how women say "men are shit" they don't mean all men. I don't mean that in anger, I'm just anti-generalization and pedantic about it lol. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 01:47 AM |
| 0 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I think the "wave" descriptor much better fits my feelings for feminism. First, second, and third wave feminism all have noble goals and in general are tolerable if you're a guy. Fourth wave feminism has started to eat its own tail and adopt a lot of hateful extremism to do what it thinks is right. I agree there are double standards though, and a lot of them. I also hate being this guy but people are wayyy less political in real life than online. Most of the people I meet still don't know what r… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 01:43 AM |
| 2 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"Well, then we agree? I don't think people like Mary P. Koss are moderate feminists. The leaders of most international feminist movements bow towards the extremist wings more often than not even if their beliefs do not originate there. It's a powerful source of social pressure. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 01:27 AM |
| 3 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"Personally, I think the ones who are out there yelling the loudest are generally the radical ones. If I look at a cross section of most of the women in my life, most of them are aware that women have been disadvantaged in some regards and wish to work towards eliminating those disadvantages. They tend to not talk in terms of toxic masculinity or emotional labor. I think that's a different question from "is there a pipeline between feminism to radical feminism?" to which I'd answer absolutely yes… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 01:25 AM |
| 9 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I think at this point "the patriarchy" as a term and concept is so washed out from any original meaning that it's not a reliable indicator of radicalism. I've seen women use it when they legitimately believed it to mean "a society where men have historically been given easier access to power" and others use it in genuine belief of "a system where men seek to oppress women in pursuit of male supremacy". It's one of those things that means whatever you want it to mean, unfortunately. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 01:22 AM |
| 26 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"You're completely right and I should call it legal parental surrender rather than paper abortion. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 12:49 AM |
| 11 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"This deserves an award (lol I posted this and someone already had). I mean, I still disagree with you because I think the mods are doing what they believe is right, they've just convinced themselves so hard that they are correct that coming to terms with the idea they might be wrong is untenable. I think most of the reason they take the stance they do is to keep the label of pro-feminist but most importantly not be criticized by feminist communities. That threat of feminist criticism is existent… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 12:47 AM |
| 16 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"That's, perhaps, the most infuriating aspect of the whole discussion to me. Because there are no two ways about it, it literally is just about dollars. I'm all for making sure that children have the right to support. I would just much rather that be through my tax dollars than my wallet. I understand that sounds counterintuitive but it's true - I would literally support taxpayer funding and sending my own money to support children who are not mine if it meant I could have legal parental surrende… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 12:40 AM |
| 5 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I completely agree with you but I definitely have separated radical feminism from moderate feminism in my experiences online. I'm cool saying radical feminism is anti-male (whether they feel it's true or not), but I just can't make the same statement about the average self-identified feminist. Feminism absolutely shouldn't have a monopoly on these issues, but it's also not fair (imo) to write it off completely when the goals of most people are not to kill all men. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 12:33 AM |
| 9 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I hate bringing stuff like this up because I don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater, you know? MensLib does a great job at discussing issues at least in a way that doesn't devolve into hateful quips and jabs at feminism and I think there's value in that. But I totally agree that this is something that they are misguided on and kowtowing to the feminist establishment a little too hard on. I do definitely disagree that it's a psyop though, these are real people and they really believe… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 12:30 AM |
| 8 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"If I'm being totally honest, I don't mind a men's sub being feminist allied, for the most part. Most moderate feminist advocacy is compatible with men's issues. The issue of legal parental surrender is just one that's so much of a nonstarter that I'm surprised again and again that they take this stand against it. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 12:20 AM |
| 62 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"I just fucking hate how the established rules go out the window whenever a man is involved, like the rules are different for us because we have penises and balls. If I don't want to become a parent I shouldn't have to be involved, end of story. I'm willing to concede a lot on that, and as other commenters have said - this isn't even comparable to abortion rights. It's not the same class of discussion. But MensLib conveniently ignores that safe haven laws exist and are in practice and give women … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 12:18 AM |
| 17 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"Which is frustrating in its own right. I'm not socialist enough to call myself a socialist, but I don't think that something as crazy-sounding as state subsidized childcare is really an existential threat to our nation or way of life. As far as hating conservative values, did you mean capitalist values? Because there's a lot of stuff with conservatism I think this subreddit openly disagrees on, or at least we recognize that conservative values are often "feel gooderies" wrapped up in nice bundle… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 12:00 AM |
| 2 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?And imagine sifting through hundreds of potential matches and just finding dud after dud after dud. That shit is soul crushing dude. Oh man, idk if I want to go down that rabbit hole. I just dislike the discussion in general because as much as I am fine accepting that online dating isn't much easier for women despite having high match rates, there's always a weird subtextual belief that squirrels its way into this comparison. Which is that the quality of female matches are better than the qualit… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/21 04:39 AM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Only when you've managed to completely misinterpret someone's comment | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/21 12:23 AM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?You're the one who can't remember what you said, and I don't care what you have to think about my post. Hage a good day, and remember it doesn't hurt to consider other people's perspectives | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/21 12:22 AM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?You’re clearly not asking this question in good faith, and have a political axe to grind If you can’t understand why people can’t abandon the only worldview they’ve ever known, just to make life easier for straight men, I don’t know what to tell you Women aren’t lumpy men. We have different hormones and brain chemistry. You’re literally asking why we aren’t testosterone driven thirst machines This has nothing to do challenging gender norms. It’s a perspective issue Literally your comment word fo… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/21 12:18 AM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Yeah they were arguing that hentai is increasingly popular with Japanese women, despite it being a visual medium so often attributed to being a male-dominated thing. If a woman's largest sex organ is her brain, why the shift here? Because it's largely cultural, not biological. I almost exclusively read erotica over porn, and I'm a guy. And about male bodies being eyesores, that's a product of cognitive bias. You aren't weighing in all the jokes that are made at the expense of hefty men, geeks, s… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/21 12:15 AM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?uh, not sure if I can change flairs but let me know Edit: think I fixed it | /r/PurplePillDebate | 13/09/21 12:00 AM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I do love how you're calling my comments bad faith and then twisting my words calling you a sociopath with no empathy. I've gotten positive responses from incels and from whatever the opposite "blue pill" is, as well as many dissents, so I'm not sure where you're going with that apart from trying to paint me as an incel - which I am not and do not subscribe to. Its not that I don't understand you, it's that I think you're being intentionally (or unintentionally, I suppose) obtuse. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 11:59 PM |
| 4 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Well that's just a whole other post. The number of times I've expressed emotion to a woman and been brutally shamed for it are... not good | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 09:59 PM |
| 2 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Sadly I don't have an answer for that | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 09:55 PM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?For the reasons me and several other people have tried conveying to you: humans are able to communicate far better than your dog and cat ever could. We don't need to have lived experiences of whatever group we are discussing to be able to have a productive relationship with them. I don't need to have a period to know that periods suck, I don't need to be a woman to understand that a lot of men are really creepy on online dating platforms. If anything you've answered this question for me because … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 09:55 PM |
| 2 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I mean, even taking everything you've said as true, this still leaves women at a net gain in terms of relative power simply because most men view most women higher in attractiveness than the reverse. Not that the whole visibility of identity in attraction isn't an issue, but things are still lopsided if you remove it from the equation | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 09:48 PM |
| 5 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?As a guy that sort of messaging is everywhere. The simple idea that there's even something like a romantic marketplace definitely drills into your head: you are not that special. As unique of a person you might be, there's someone else who has better qualities and a better life than you, so you need to step it up in order to be seen. Self esteem for the sake of self esteem is... not really a thing among men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 09:45 PM |
| 5 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Nah, I'm not going to take advice from someone who is this openly sexist. There are social issues women face and there's broad faced sexism, you've used the latter to try to discuss the former. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 09:43 PM |
| 2 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I'm saying that there are times in my life where if I had the ability to use a widely acknowledged social power somewhat selfishly that I would have done so. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 09:42 PM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I think you are misinterpreting... pretty much my entire post. I'm not suggesting women are the same as men or demanding they change anything. I'm asking a question - "why is this not a prevalent discussion among women?" | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 09:40 PM |
| 1 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Sorry I'm just very confused because you really seem set that challenging someone's perspective on gender is a completely foreign thing but there are a lot of people in this thread doing that | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:50 PM |
| 2 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I never thought I'd see someone shill the idea that the media and cultural expressions of gender roles are correct lol | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:47 PM |
| 3 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Because I work with a lot of them haha | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:44 PM |
| 6 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I mean, I definitely disagree that most men want to control their partners like you seem to posit. We're more like you than you think, we want love and appreciation too. It's easy to get embittered as a man because you have no recourse for the instances where people do have you on a string. Even if you take out the aspect of relationships from it all and just view men as a resource to extract... what's stopping that? That might be where more of my confusion is placed. I can certainly see how som… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:43 PM |
| 3 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Fair enough | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:35 PM |
| 3 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I'm not sure what you think the numbers are but I'm willing to bet it's higher than you think. I think more than half the women at my work (in their late 20s/early 30s) have men in their lives who are overly interested in them | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:35 PM |
| 3 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?There's definitely something to be said about the morality of being a good person and not manipulating others but I'll be the devils advocate with two counters: Is it really manipulation if there are a steady stream of people who seem to want to be manipulated? Does this type of behavior have any place in terms of short term fulfillment? There are absolutely times as a guy where I know it's not the most healthy thing, but I really just wanted intimacy/human touch/meaningless attention. But those… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:30 PM |
| 2 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Well no offense but by your logic I should not even try to understand social plights of others because I'll never live their experience. Like, is that not what communication is for? To understand others who we are not? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:25 PM |
| 10 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Well I certainly don't disagree but good luck with this one | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:23 PM |
| 2 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I mean you might acknowledge it but it is anecdotally a rarity. Guys are probably offended by it because there's no immediate recourse. It will take decades if not centuries to change social norms so that men are equally desired. Being told that you have much less social capital in your romantic life is a tough pill to swallow. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:22 PM |
| 6 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Why do you think straight people would have that insight?! I mean, last I checked straight women date and fucked men, and part of that dating and fucking generally comes some interest in knowing the other sexes desires and behaviors | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:19 PM |
| 14 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?The funny thing about this is that when a man whom they want comes into the picture, most women turn into submissive simps. I'm starting to think this is the proper answer. Rationality disappears in the face of attraction, for both men and women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:17 PM |
| 3 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?I disagree that women are the more desirable partner most of the time simply from anecdotal experience, unless you have any evidence to the contrary? Quite literally any male space where the discussion of dating has been broached would suffice. No offense but it's just like... an extremely common feeling as a guy to be frustrated with your role as the one romance happens because of and not the one romance happens to. In any case, MensLib had a good post about this recently. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:16 PM |
| 4 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?But certainly it's not completely a matter of perception? I don't know what it's like to live as a woman yet I'm aware of issues they face I do not. I don't think you have to be a man to know how easily swayed some men can be | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 08:08 PM |
| 12 | Why do women seem to not acknowledge the sheer amount of power they hold over straight men?Well that's definitely part of it - men definitely appear to have less power on the face of it all. I mean if you take online dating statistics into account they show pretty unequivocally that women are in demand and men are in supply. It's all well and good to acknowledge that this happens in reverse (it certainly does), but on average a woman has a much stronger chance of being the "desirable" partner. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 12/09/21 07:52 PM |
| 1 | As a recently ex-feminist I have found that Feminism (at least the most prominent online forms) is Toxic, extremely hateful and anti male.This new feminist movement is NOT about gender equality. It is about feminine empowerment over males but males to be held to high standards for their servitude and pleasure. Would you mind expanding in what you mean here with a bit more detail? I'm kind of curious where you see this happening. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/01/21 06:12 AM |
| 40 | As a recently ex-feminist I have found that Feminism (at least the most prominent online forms) is Toxic, extremely hateful and anti male.One of the things that bugs me most about feminism (which, don't get me wrong - I'm not even anti-feminism, I'd still consider myself a feminist) is their least-charitable interpretation to anyone who brings up a different topic. It's never "maybe men have issues too" or "perhaps it's bad on both sides", it's "men are trying to distract from women" or "they're just trying to undermine us". I remember one conversation with my very-feminist friend where she went OFF on me for mentioning circumcisi… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/01/21 01:34 AM |
| 7 | Anti male bias on the Netflix show Messiah: how fathers contributions are erased.That didn't stun me, what stunned me was the almost 2x disparity in the "paid work" graph... fucking hell | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 11/01/21 01:27 AM |
| 3 | "Girls will save the future."What changed? No offense but from what I've read on some threads here it's a rather large change to undergo. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/09/20 05:03 AM |
| 3 | Do you think the average woman thinks of men as being people too?That's one of my favorite comments on reddit. Surprised to see someone else who it impacted. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/09/20 03:12 AM |
| 8 | Do you think the average woman thinks of men as being people too?I wasn't gonna reply to this thread because it's gone longer than I thought but literally every woman that I've brought up the issue of it being uncool to make small dick jokes has either replied stating that I must be concerned about it because of my own endowment, or continued to make the jokes. Even my body positive, third wave feminist friends. Overall I think this thread brings up a lot of things though. Sure, I can see that women are more exposed to male POVs but I rarely, if EVER see a po… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/09/20 08:59 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter