TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwred01 Archive

View 1 posts and 146 comments by throwred01 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

throwred01/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/14 08:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yep, exactly. See something you don't like. Poof. Gone. Next.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 11:53 PM
1

Oh, please, keep proving my point for me. I don't think you've proved it hard enough yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 09:23 PM
0

I asked you a question. But I think you actually just answered it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 03:28 PM
0

I haven't gotten a chance to reply until now. I was out for the Fourth of July holiday. It kind of got me reminiscing about my my time protesting the Iraq War. We had a saying back then. Proud member of the reality-based community. That was in response to something an unnamed White House official (coughcoughCheney) once said about reporters. That they were "reality-based." That they obsessively studied reality, documented it, tried to find the best course of action using intuition and understand…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/14 07:53 AM
2

Same question as above.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 11:04 PM
6

Go for it. I have about ten that say the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 09:30 PM
3

Wow. Much style. Very gentleman. Most god-like. Women should amaze. Edit: Thought you said doge.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 08:13 PM
16

Yes, how tragic that a call for sanity fell on deaf ears of those predisposed to be prejudiced. Clearly, it's my fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 09:44 AM
1

And bad at reading comprehension too. Did I say "Fuck me"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 07:30 AM
10

Advertise!? I was being accused of being part of a group that condoned or at least conditioned a murderer. And I was doing my best to correct that misconception and cool the rhetoric out of respect for the dead. Edited to remove me saying "Fuck you."
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 07:18 AM
10

Do you intend on backing that up with some kind of reason why?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 03:38 AM
10

I gave a very respectful post after the UCSB tragedy, after requesting permission from a mod, in which I stated that Elliott Rodger should be looked at as the crazy person he was, and not the "victim" if an ideology he never subscribed to and despised, known as the red pill. I talked about how the red pill could have taught him to take responsibility for himself, and could have saved his life and the lives of those he killed, if only he had been capable of taking it. I said that, in light of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/14 02:06 AM
1

Unless you can bring up an example beyond what I just addressed, I have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/14 01:27 AM
1

That's not exactly what they're saying. They're saying you'll have an easier time with shit tests if you're hot. The thing about shit tests is that women sell them as being like, I'm totally offended, and you need to respect me and this horridly unreasonable thing I just said if we're going to continue. And yet, if the man is attractive, the same things aren't offensive to her. Because he's hawwt and she just wants him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/14 01:20 AM
1

My dear, I haven't even started to share kinks with you. ; ) I gave up on my urethra after infection set in, and now I just work on the back door. Everything there fits as long as I shove it in with my horse cock dildo. The flared head makes it difficult to get inside, especially since I consider lube a cheat. But it's worth it. Weaseling in vagina references? That was my second post with period jokes. And at this point it's become a theme of our conversation. And since you appear to have missed…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 07:15 PM
1

Of course not! How would you even run a study like that. They support behavioral dimorphism and the dark triad. Watch the damned documentary already.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 04:25 PM
1

The Distance Between Mars and Venus: Measuring Global Sex Differences in Personality Niceness and Dating Success: A Further Test of the Nice Guy Stereotype Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men's traits Red, Rank, and Romance in Women Viewing Men. The interpersonal meaning of sexual promiscuity. The dating mind: Evolutionary psychology and the emerging science of h…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/14 05:26 AM
2

What the heak is Rilakkuma?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 10:06 PM
2

Ah, that's a good one. I've discussed it with my constitutional law professor -- children are "discrete and insular minorities." The political process explicitly excludes them. For many of the best reasons we have for protecting anybody in equal protection law, those reasons apply to children. Now, I could point out that, unlike race and gender and national origin, age is not necessarily an "immutable trait." And I could point out that the young and old are both actually served pretty well by th…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 10:04 PM
1

Woah! I'm bleeding through two a day. It sounds like you're going through about four times that. No, dear heart, I have no problem talking to you alone here, I just don't see why you don't. I thought you bluepers tried to limit your alone time with us scary red pill men as much as possible. Moreover, this isn't a "debate" any more, because debates need audiences. If you want this to be PurplePillShoutingMatch we can do that, but I definitely don't see why you'd want to. As for your well-reasoned…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/14 07:58 PM
1

No, but the question of the thread presupposes that sexism is okay. Ok. If sexim is ok, and the question of the thread is "No, seriously, how is "Captain and First Mate" not extremely sexist?" the answer to that question is: "It is sexist. The red pill is sexist. It doesn't claim to not be. And why does it matter to you, at all?" A few people in this thread are saying it's not sexist, and I feel like a good number of the people on TRP would prefer to say that they're not sexist. That's because n…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 10:03 PM
0

That is not the position I started with. That is not the position I wanted to have. That is the position women proved to me was correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 05:43 PM
2

You've got good taste.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 08:08 AM
1

What can I say? It's a "heavy flow" week. You might try responding on the thread in which the "conspiracy" was discussed. Not on a thread that's fallen off the front page and has only two upvotes, making it extremely unlikely that anyone but me is ever going to read what you're saying, even on accident. Right now, all you're doing is taking up space on a hard drive somewhere, telling me, and only me, over and over how much you think I am teh suck. Which is, you know... like... mean. You're a bad…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 07:59 AM
5

So the question of this thread is no longer is "Captain and First Mate" sexist? It's is being sexist ok? Why mention captain and first mate at all then?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 06:44 AM
1

Yeah, because we didn't just have a thread in which a ton of people complained that blue has been downvoting people just for posting. It isn't like that just happened. No, it's all me. I mean, clearly, I just suck that bad. That's why you're still here talking to me. In a click to read more tab. On a thread that isn't on the front page of PPD any more. That only had two up votes. You know we're the only one's here, right? You must be that much a glutton for punishment. In any case, if TRP's asse…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 04:29 AM
1

I'm just trying to get a sense of you Yeah... Why? Anyway, no, second was definitely the feminism I experienced. I didn't see any signs of third wave even being taken seriously anywhere until about a decade ago. So I don't see how that's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/14 02:23 AM
1

I am a very young member of Generation X. I think we really perfected ideas such as feminism, but being as young as I am, I feel I've been better able to watch these ideas not stand the test of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:42 PM
1

Yes, I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:31 PM
2

What the dictionary thinks.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:26 PM
-1

The blue pill is "satire" in the way The Daily Show is satire. It's satire with a deeply political message. The problem is, the people who post on TBP aren't very witty and can't really produce satire. Add to that the cognitive dissonance from reading red pill content they totally don't believe is true at all! and they just tend to out and out drop the satire part in favor of the politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:27 AM
5

It is sexist. The red pill is sexist. It doesn't claim to not be. I think you're using sexist as a stand-in for some other word.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:21 AM
0

I had a little too much penis to ever be fully accepted into the Dworkin camp. I tried to split the difference on the porn debate. My stance was, if it could be demonstrated to be non-exploitative in it's treatment and portrayal of women then it should be allowed. Otherwise it should be boycotted. In private, I had difficulty adhering to this ideal. I had a lot of shame too, feeling like just being attracted to women on the street was somehow exploitative. I know this attitude contributed to my …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/14 08:09 AM
1

No. Because frankly I'm not high enough value yet. I'm still early on in my lifting, my writing is still shit, I can't keep organized, I have trouble maintaining frame sometimes, and frankly, there are health issues I'm not dealing with. (Hide your bulge blue, I'm not overweight. I'm not your fedora wearing stereotype.) Right now, I don't deserve a lot, but I'm doing my best to be more worthwhile.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 06:54 AM
3

Go on. Nothing? No it's fine. It's not like you should have to back up what you say. Especially in a debate. Besides, I think I understand. Based on what I've gathered from my time here on PPD, none of you believe a person is a radical feminist unless the word "tumblr" is involved. It's going to come as a great shock, but there was a time when radfems had things to say that weren't in meme or hashtag form. Things like "Sexism will only truly end when we dismantle the media and the political syst…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 06:46 AM
0

Oh! What does the "e" stand for?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/14 06:05 AM
1

That was part of the original. I obsessively edit for grammar, and I never get it right. If I edit for content I note it in an "Edit:"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 11:29 PM
2

When I started out, second wave feminism was referred to as "feminism" and third wave feminism was referred to as "fuck-me feminism," and laughed off. Feminism just made more sense back then. It was just that "radical notion" about women being people. It believed that women shouldn't be judged by their appearance but by their worth. And there was this cabal of men you could point to as the oppressors. They ran the media. I don't think you kids today here on my lawn really understand how differen…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 06:50 PM
2

I won't let you kill again. It means I know what I'm talking about. Doesn't mean I can't make a mistake, like I did above when I accidentally used the definition of patriarchy used during first and second wave feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 05:22 PM
2

Hmm. That's interesting. I certainly haven't seen that. To quote myself above: Saying that anti-feminism isn't entirely wrong is absolutely not the blue pill's stance. If that is your stance, then you are clearly in the "purple" camp.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 05:16 PM
0

I'm sorry. What is terp?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 09:20 AM
1

Yes, thank you, I did figure that out. Fortunately, having had been a radical feminist I know I'm not making a strawman, so there must be a lot of horror in the wheat fields of Middle America.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 08:49 AM
0

Huh, gee, I didn't know. Oh wait, let me go find one of my old gender studies text books.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 06:49 AM
0

I was a radical feminist for more than a decade. But yes, yes, I kind of fudged the definition there as I already explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 06:33 AM
1

But all the disagreements always boil down to the same reasons. TRP believes seduction too limited in scope, /r/seduction doesn't believe it's ideas should become a lifestyle. You're not impressed? Right there in the feels. Downvotes are absolutely censorship. Why am I having to explain this? Just one drops your comment like a rock as far down the listings as it can to where it's least likely to be read. Enough of them, and of course, your comment gets relegated to a click to read more link. It …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 06:07 AM
3

No, it is not clear. The blue pill exists for one reason and one reason only. To lampoon anti-feminism, the idea that feminism is wrong. If you believe that people are wrong for saying an idea is wrong, then by definition you are saying that the idea is right. Saying that anti-feminism isn't entirely wrong is absolutely not the blue pill's stance. If that is your stance, then you are clearly in the "purple" camp. And that makes sense. I think nearly all purple people see things in shades of brow…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 05:45 AM
2

Man... things in farming communities must be f'ed up.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 05:33 AM
5

What a fucking weird thing to say. Like I know you're trying to say that these people don't exist. But why go human scarecrow, presumably dead body arranging on it?? Anyway, yes, yes. When feminism first started, and even into the second wave, there was a literal cabal of rich white men you could say were "keeping women down." And this is what the theory started out pointing to. As time progressed, however, it became clear that the cabal had transformed from rich white men to rich blank blank. A…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 05:18 AM
4

Yes, I am very aware that feminism is a house divided. I am also very aware that feminist theory and what is popular in feminism right now runs counter to what you were saying. As for my eyesight, I don't know. Research shows that men can't experience color as vividly as women. But what about you? I'm guessing you only see things in shades of brown given your stance.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 05:03 AM
3

I'm sure glad that blue pillers are so level headed as to put society's problems on society and not on, oh say, some mythical cabal of men, a "patriarchy" if you will, causing all the problems. I'm sure glad they're willing to take a holistic, systemic approach, and wouldn't dare dream of saying the only way to stop a serious problem in society was to stop teaching women something, and instead, teach men not to do something. Yes, those rational and even handed BPers. Why just yesterday I was on …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/14 01:57 AM
2

A woman that can maintain the household while the man goes out and does the work to earn the money. A red pill man expects to come home from a long day of work to a clean house with a hot meal and a blowjob waiting for them much like a child wants to come home from a long day of school to eat some snacks and play some games with their friends. Or much like anyone expects a rest period after a strenuous period of doing anything. The woman is to be the first mate while the man is the captain. Thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 10:35 PM
1

Nah, I'm sure you've had far douchier lines given to you. I was heavily involved in polyamory for several years, including being part of an organization that promotes it. That means I don't just have one anecdote. I have many personal experiences, combined with the personal experiences I have observed, combined with those which have been relayed to me, combined with the general culture of polyamory I experienced. If you were right, we would be on opposite sides of this debate. And thank you for …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 06:52 PM
2

It's so fascinating to watch how feminism has changed over the years. When I was young even saying NAWALT would have branded you an apostate. NWALT was the correct answer. After the invention of the internet we realized just how common place this kind of behavor was, so we had to attribute it to patriarchal space wizards controlling minds of weaker women. Meanwhile, the stronger smarter women go home to their husbands and boyfriends and deny them sex because he forgot to pick up the milk, and do…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 08:12 AM
1

I used to be a radical feminist. I found a woman very secure in her being. We were also heavily involved in radical sex positive feminism. If you were right, we wouldn't be on opposite sides of this debate. I encourage all the men out there to look into third wave feminism and polyamory. It is the fastest route to the red pill there is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 07:52 AM
-1

You are 100% the problem there. You either haven't done any of the things that insure she will not behave this way, or you made a lot of mistakes holding your frame. Either way, her behavor is absolutely your fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 07:42 AM
1

Well, /r/seduction and /r/TheRedPill agree on almost everything. The only real difference is that TRP sees itself as a lifestyle, while /r/seduction is very content to just pick up chicks. But the philosophy of TRP is based on concepts created by /r/seduction, and any real disagreements between the two boil down to TRP believing /r/seduction to be too limited in scope. I'm impressed, I didn't think you could make a point that intelligent, though. Kudos. As for the blue pill censorship brigade, d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/14 07:16 AM
1

No, those examples are also stupid. /r/seduction was created more than four years before /r/TheRedPill. And right in the banner in /r/becomeaman you can see it says "THEREDPILL PRESENTS" which makes it just like /r/AlreadyRed. Anyway, you were about to tell me why TBP is routinely disrespecting everyone here by violating this subs rules and attempting to censor anyone who has an opinion they don't agree with. Go on.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 07:29 PM
2

I'm very confused as to your point right now. The question here is do these "alternative" RPW subs created by people who seem to feel dissatisfied either with creators or the goals of RPW show that women feel threatened by each other. Bringing up /r/AlreadyRed makes no sense because it is created by the men who created the original and they're doing it to further the goals of the original. Bringing up /r/exredpill makes no sense because it's not trying to be an alternative red pill. In fact I th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 09:00 AM
10

I'll tell you exactly why dread game is so important to the blue pill. Because up until now, dread game has been something only women did. But when they did it, it was called "having standards" or "making him work for it," and met with high-fiveing you-go-girl empowerment. Dread game is about making it clear in no uncertain terms that if your partner fucks up by not meeting your standards, you are out the door. And we all know this is something women do all the time. Said something wrong? She do…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/14 08:38 AM
0

Are these subs created by some of the main contributors of RPW, just looking to do content control? Oh hi downvote brigade.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/14 11:17 PM
1

As so you pointed to a sub created by the exact same people who believe the exact same thing as the main sub, but who simply wanted to do better quality control.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/14 08:48 PM
2

Ok. And that shows that many people feel there's too much noise on the main sub. Do you have a point?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/14 07:04 PM
2

Why would they? /r/AlreadyRed advertizes itself as being TRP but with a higher signal to noise ratio, and /r/exredpill is for men who've rejected the red pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/14 06:45 PM
0

That's a disgusting thing to even suggest. No, no, the male suicide rate is not higher because men are just "better at it." The rate of attempted suicide is only higher in adolescent girls, and that's not even maintained into young adult hood. And, yeah, I see what you mean. Because it's not like TBP has ever deleted reasonable comments they disagreed with. Like the time I very calmly explained that Elliot Rodgers hated The Red Pill, and that we were making fun of him in the weeks before the mur…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/14 08:48 AM
1

I'm a little confused by your question. Believing something is true doesn't preclude one from using it as a lens, usually quite the opposite. Are you asking how far TRP can be expanded politically, or... what? As for how "reasonable and open minded" red pillers are here as opposed to on the main sub, I have to say, I really don't see a difference. And I think the question shows a lack of understanding of what The Red Pill is or why people come to it. Feminism denies the agency of men as much as …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/14 06:08 AM
0

Mammal: There are no confirmed cases of sex role reversed mammals but female spotted hyenas have peculiar anatomy and behavior that has warranted much attention.[41] Female spotted hyenas are much more aggressive than males due to their high levels of androgens during development. The increased male hormones during development contribute to an enlarged pseudopenis that is involved in mating and birth.[42] Although the anatomical and behavioral roles differ from accepted norms, spotted hyenas are…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/14 07:31 PM
23

The recent tragedy was committed by an anti PUA whose few ventures into the manosphere were always met with mockery. His videos were featured and mocked on TRP before the tragedy. In his videos, he clearly states that he hates the sort of man The Red Pill teaches you to be. This tragedy had nothing to do with The Red Pill. This tragedy had nothing to do with The Blue Pill. This tragedy was caused by one unbalanced and profoundly isolated individual.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/14 08:12 PM
7

So, I'll admit I haven't dug very deeply into his rantings. But you keep saying he was radicalized by this subreddit and uses this subreddit's terms. Where? Point that out. He's been associated to antiPUA.com and he defenitly seems to be speaking in those terms. No one here wants to be the ultimate gentleman. We understand that is not what women want, and we're not confused by that because it makes sense. He's speaking in nothing but Blue Pill terms. Yeah, noting that the cause of a hate crime i…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 09:03 AM
9

I don't even think this guy had his eyes open.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 08:26 AM
-1

I'm not even subscribed to it, because you just follow the weekly plan at the beginning as a goal set. I'd encourage you to actually read what's in that sub first. Everything there is about adding value to yourself to do with whatever you want. And please do not continue to exploit dead people. Does TBP honestly believe for a second that Elliot Rodgers was Red Pill? Especially, in light of the fact that WE were one of the main subs making fun of him. Hell, we're probably a big reason the shootin…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 08:24 AM
4

There is hardly any talk about "acquiring currency". It's all about women. /r/becomeaman
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 08:05 AM
13

No. Women are people. Hamsters are small furry rodents. Women are sexually attracted to dark triad appetitive aggressive men who display social status. And they're interested in considerate and calm men in long term non sexual provider rolls. And I have a litany of studies to back that up with. Now, obviously, as a woman, it's very difficult to approach your relationships with men in those terms and not hate yourself. As these things appear to be subconscious drives (again I have the research) i…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 06:57 AM
3

It's not that they're smaller set. It's that it's a phase you have to go through. As men, we want more than anything in the world, to find the woman of our dreams. The Red Pill shows you that is basically impossible. And that searching for that has been the cause of so many problems in your life. You can't help but feel bitter when you realize that. But of course, there's a flip side to that. You can fix all those problems by just giving up on the impossible and working on yourself. And when you…
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 06:19 AM
3

Well, you'll notice the word "could." I can't say one way or the other if The Red Pill would have saved his life and the lives of the women he murdered. And yes, the Red Pill is not an actual pharmaceutical. All I can say is that if it can drastically improve my life, as it has, then it can drastically improve the life of any man who's life can be improved.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 05:36 AM
19

The Red Pill could have prevented these murders. The Red Pill could have shown that man that his social success rests entirely in his hands. The Red Pill could have taught him how to be a better, stronger, more capable man. If you want to know what caused these deaths, The Red Pill is not the place to look. And as the Red Pill becomes more of a force in our culture, (and I truly believe it will) you're going to see tragedies greatly diminish in frequency.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 03:33 AM
2

I think this is something the mods need to be addressing in a big eye catching sticky post right now. This is a "teachable moment." The red pill didn't cause these murders. The red pill could have easily prevented them.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 02:37 AM
-1

Wow. Men are entitled to take sex from women now? Well, when did this happen... I've been lifting for months, and working on my writing, and learning a new language, and then they just make it so I'm just entitled? Dick move guys.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 02:30 AM
1

I didn't wanna do this but it seems you insist. Watch out! A wild Badass appears! You just had a crush for a girl who only saw in you a second option. You don't know how wrong you are. I'd been looking for a person exactly like her for a very long time. Our emotional connection was deep, to the point of being physical. We called it our pisces fish connection. (We're both pisces.) It was like nothing either of us had ever felt before, and it was completely outclassed by her feelings for alpha coc…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/14 02:14 AM
1

Oh. Social justice made it a bad experience. Not the fact that she was fucking a man who didn't care about her, while I was doing everything I could to show I loved her. Not the fact that she was totally blind to what he was obviously doing. Not the fact that I had to watch as she grieved for him so hard after he dumped her like trash. Not the fact that she didn't care nearly as much when I dumped her. Not the fact that when I was testing the red pill, while we were broken up but still seeing ea…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 09:32 AM
1

You know, I don't think I ever saw an all male poly relationship, or if I did, I didn't get close enough to observe it. I'm sure they exist. Yeah, I donno.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/14 05:36 AM
1

The difference that I saw was that the women involved all really seemed content with the situation, while the vast majority of the men did not. All the harem women I've met were quite happy being kept, and considered the situation liberating and somehow feminist. They only kept quiet about their feelings about the other women involved for fear of spoiling their good thing. Meanwhile the men walked around like kicked puppies. And any peep was chided as sex-negitive or anti-feminist. That is with …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/14 07:34 PM
1

I don't advocate for poly or anything, I just make threads in which you advocate for polygamy, polyamory, and open relations...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/14 09:52 AM
1

No community. I don't even call myself poly, nor do my partners. : /
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 11:37 PM
1

Because our experiences aren't exactly the same in every way, mine are invalid? I was a member of an organization that promotes sex positive culture and kink. I wasn't a very active member. My participation was mostly about me figuring out that I didn't want to participate. But I did make friends with a lot of poly people, both locally and from around the country. Of course, I wasn't saying that everyone practicing polyamory is a feminist social justice warrior. But I can tell you that sex posit…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 09:05 PM
5

I don't understand the mental gymnastics you're using to reach that conclusion, but, of course, you're not correct. I spent years delving into sex positive and kink culture, and I've seen a ton of poly relationships. Never been on tumblr.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 08:18 AM
3

I don't know if this needs to be said, but I'm going to say it anyway. My experiences did not confirm red pill stereotypes for me. My experiences were simply deeply confusing and painful, and the red pill just explained to me what was going on. This in spite of me not wanting it to be true, fighting it, testing it. I'm also really interested in what the OP has to say about his experiences. The latest thing the red pill has taught me is that women are not the only ones who hamster. Certainly less…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/14 03:58 AM
17

I've got a lot of experience with polyamory too. It's a big part of why I took the red pill. For those of you who don't know, polyamory is a massive rallying point for sex positive third wave feminists. A relationship style that by it's very nature creates equality... somehow. (Don't ask us how!) So if you don't accept polyamory we just can't let you in the cool kids club. When I was interested in sex positive culture, I was really more interested in doing my own thing. I couldn't believe how ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/14 06:04 PM
9

The hilarious part is it's not even correct as a term. You can't mix your Latin and Greek root words. I guess polyphilia didn't have the same ring to it.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 04:31 PM
120

This is already happening. They're calling it "polyamory" and it's a really huge movement very much in fashion with sex positive third wavers. It's exactly like what you're describing.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 06:08 AM
1

... First of all, you misspelled consistently. Second, there are no links in there to any studies. Third, there are no links in there to anything showing that "men consistenly score higher on narcissism," including the Wikipedia page. (Though it does mention men in a section discussing a form of clinical narcissism.) I'm no longer going to humor you by replying to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/14 10:25 AM
0

First of all I just want to say that my silence from yesterday was not meant as a concession. I am a very busy man. Second, I have to say that out of all the blue pillers here, you've come the closest to actually providing proof, and therefore actually fostering some kind of intelligent debate. Unlike every other blue piller I have so far talked to here, you do not seem to be posting things dishonestly or idiotically. So, thank you, RunnerManBoy. But, the thing that stands out to me here is that…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/14 09:43 AM
1

If that's the case, it shouldn't be this hard for you to find a study in support of that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/14 07:56 AM
0

Wow. Every study? What a cite! I'm waiting for your side to post something of value to be debated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/14 02:05 AM
4

Yet another source talking about Narcissistic Personality Disorder. As you guys insist on posting things that have nothing to do with what we're talking about, I'm going to post Bobby Darin singing Mack the Knife. EDIT: The first sentence of your cite. "Narcissistic personality disorder is rare." That should have been a huge indication to you that this had nothing to do with what we're talking about. Did you not read it before posting? Or did you just hope that I wouldn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/14 01:43 AM
2

Alright, let's see here. You have two studies of narcissistic personality disorder, a real clinical disorder affecting about 1% of the population, believed to be a result of early childhood trauma. But no one is talking about that here. What we are discussing is called non-clinical (or sub-clinical) narcissism, and is not recognized as a disorder. This is an absolutely critical distinction to make. For instance, a study of hacking and slashing Dexter style clinical psychopathy will have nothing …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/14 01:33 AM
4

In addition to what RunnerManBoy has presented, studies show that men are more narcissitic than women, and they direct that hostility toward women: Source Seeing a study of narcissistic males acting aggressively towards females in that source. Not seeing anything about men being more narcissistic than women in there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/14 10:01 AM
2

Brace for new subscribers, brothers. Hold. Hold! HOLD!!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/14 09:37 AM
10

This is basic Red Pill 101 stuff. Women are not more empathetic than men. "Men are the romantics forced to be the realists, while women are the realists using romanticisms to effect their imperatives (hypergamy)." We men are the truly empathetic ones. We desire love based on interpersonal compatibility and trust. We want to form solid strong teams in virtually every thing we do. Women on the other hand, view empathy as a tool. Probing the psychology of those around them in an attempt to get what…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/14 09:27 AM
2

I have no interest in either going through your post history, or in talking to you further.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/14 08:44 AM
4

You were misrepresenting yourself a victim of the riddit community's interest, who has only here and TBP to turn to elevate your feelings of fear and disgust. In fact, you are a radical anti-MRA active in at least seven subreddits that focus heavily on The Red Pill. You tried to use emotional manipulation. You were stopped. That's the end of the story.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/14 08:42 AM
7

Well, let's take a look. I post to TBP because it's the only easy way for me to process the emotions I feel because of TRP. Now that's just dishonest. She's subscribed to at least six other subreddits that focus heavily on the TRP. I only think of it when I log on, so I'm sure I could rid myself of thoughts of it by deleting TBP from my subscriptions, but then I'd see it through mentions on the site -- so I use TBP as a means of expressing my disgust through mockery. And through the at leasts si…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/14 08:32 AM
3

I really hope you're not lying about this too. Or else I'm not the only one who should feel really insulted right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 06:42 AM
6

Yeah, so, as I said, I was just trying to avoid asking a stupid question and making an ass of myself, and stumbled on the fact that you were being completely dishonest and manipulative when I checked two pages of your post history. And that's where it begins and ends for me. It is blatantly clear that you were misrepresenting yourself. It insults me to have to talk to you about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 06:29 AM
9

It scares me to see such blatant dishonesty and manipulative tactics used here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 06:14 AM
6

No. This was a calculated maneuver by an extreme anti-MRA. It just didn't work out well for them. So to salvage it, they're trying to pretend like they weren't exposed. That's not working out well for them either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 06:06 AM
6

Well, that depends on you, and how insulted you are by simple statements of fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/14 04:57 AM
9

Or seven. EDIT: No one would be offended if you started.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/14 06:34 PM
12

So then why are you subscribed here as well? Just to make sure the answer wouldn't be "Well, I don't really post here that often." I checked your post history. I hope that wasn't untoward. But I couldn't help but notice from just two pages, that you're subscribed to at least 5 other subreddits where The Red Pill is likely to be discussed, including SRS, againstmensrights, and FeMRADebates. You're going for an emotional response here, but you're being dishonest. You're not just seeing it through …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/14 06:33 PM
8

I post here because I can see what I think a lot of people are starting to see - feminism is dieing. I really think something that resembles the basic ideas of The Red Pill is going to replace it in the coming decades. The evidence is just too compelling. But The Red Pill is such a work in progress. It needs to stop being a circle jerk and learn how to answer challenges. The only way to do that is debate. So thanks for helpin' out, blue pill. : )
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/14 06:02 AM
1

I believe The Red Pill wants men to become what Confucius termed "Exemplary Men." Strong, capable, in control. Authoritative. Not authoritarian. If it were authoritarian, it would advocate a return to the marriage based repression of the patriarchal system ended by feminism, and it most certainly does not do that. Instead, it teaches men to act in ways dictated by what women find attractive. That is far from an authoritarian ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 08:31 PM
1

Yep. This sounds so much like who I was, I can see myself having written it. You're going to find that life does not agree with what you wrote. And, if you're anything like I was, nothing I or anyone here can say will convince you. You're only going to accept it after you completely run out of ways of proving life wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 08:09 PM
3

When someone states that the only reason someone would think TRP thinks women cheat more than men is because of solipcism that is dismissing the criticism as being frivolous and unreasonable. Well, and that's only because it is. The apple and oranges example is an incredibly poor analogy No, it was a perfectly fine response to what you had said. But just like /u/soulcakeduck, you are now making a qualified statement - a new accusation. Say an extremely fat person just ate 50 apple pies in an hou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 12:07 PM
1

Yes, I don't like posting the same thing over and over, because it creates a pollution. How would it have created a pollution to tell me where you'd posted your link? It's long but a pretty solid(and full of citations to peer reviewed studies) criticism of the overreaching conclusions Evolutionary Psychology and specifically Buss makes. Which is exactly why it doesn't matter to this conversation at all. We're not discussing the conclusions of Evolutionary Psychology. It does not matter that this…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/14 11:01 AM
0

You haven't posted any sources while talking to me. Was it here on this thread? I have no way of knowing, and I'm not going to go through your entire post history. As for Buss, I'm a little confused. He's had a long celebrated career, including an assistant professor position at Harvard, and he's won many awards for his research. I'm afraid that if you want to attack his research specifically, that really should probably be it's own topic, don't you think? And the first study gives me a "File No…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 09:45 AM
1

Can do. From the venerable Kinsey Institute: [Infidelity in Heterosexual Couples: Demographic, Interpersonal, and Personality-Related Predictors of Extradyadic Sex](http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/publications/PDF/Infidelity in hetero couples.pdf) The study's conclusion. Previous research has indicated that relationship variables are particularly important to women’s sexual functioning and satisfaction (Basson,2005;Byers, 2001; Dennerstein, Lehert, Burger, & Guthrie, 2005; Ellison, 2001; Nicholls…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 09:11 AM
1

No. I gave the fair response. You are speaking now in qualitative terms that weren't used before. You are making an new accusation. And the fair response to that is: Here are three blog posts about why people like oranges (or rather two... because the middle one doesn't have anything about this subject in it that I can find). Have I just given you any information about why people like apples? EDIT: And before you start, I know you're going to say something about "you say honor is a male abstract…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 07:47 AM
-1

So when TRP uses women cheating to confirm what I wrote above, it's perfectly fair to point out that men cheat too, often times more than women. No one's questioning what is fair for you to do or not to do. But it is utterly illogical to conclude TRP believes that men don't cheat simply because it often discusses why women cheat. I am eating an apple. Have I just said I've never eaten an orange?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 07:12 AM
-2

Incorrect. It has been long established that there are significant differences both in why men and women cheat, and in what they consider cheating. It's pretty much as /u/robesta has put it, though in my opinion, most of the research is old now. At this point it could honestly stand to be "re-established."
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 06:47 AM
1

These findings suggest that the common assumption (and often-found effect) that women are less likely than men to engage in infidelity is, at least partially, a reflection of traditional gender-based differences in power that exist in society. If we are to accept that, then the recent studies which show that men and women are cheating at just about an equal rate becomes provocative to both sides. So, point to purple?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/14 06:41 AM
2

Right now, I have up eleven full free studies, the abstracts for two more, and a link to a full free 7-part documentary series. I have left the two abstracts up, in spite of the fact that one of them doesn't provide enough information, and actually harms my case just a touch. By your own admission, there's no rule violation here. Just a violation of guidelines any rational person can see do not apply to the current situation. Please stop violating this subreddit's first rule. Leave me alone or I…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 06:59 PM
2

Please help me understand here. The full text is: While the previous rules are an essential guide to posting in this subreddit, it is ultimately up to moderator discretion whether a post or comment is to be removed or not. Violation of the spirit of a rule can often be accomplished without violating the letter of it. The moderator team must be flexible when dealing with such an environment. If you are interpreting the first sentence there to mean the mods can do whatever the hell they want, inst…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 06:27 PM
2

I have not violated a rule of this subreddit in either letter or in spirit. By pursuing me over nothing, you are violating the first rule of this subreddit. Until you change the rules, do not ask me to change behavor that is not in violation of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 05:48 PM
2

Good thing I didn't post just abstracts then, thanks! : )
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 05:07 PM
5

Not one study says that male attraction is not tied to a hormone cycle. Actually, some studies do show that men's hormones fluctuate upon encountering an ovulating woman. Men's hormones also fluctuate throughout the day and and even seasonably. Admittedly, the affects this has on behavior has not been well studied. So far, that's the closest I've seen a blue piller come to providing actual evidence for their case. And still, by your own admission, it does not rise to the level proving anything. …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 10:17 AM
1

Every single study you cited was talking about initial attraction, and initial attraction only, which affects the partners chosen for short term sexual relationships. Many of them went onto to conclude that these traits are not only applicable to long term relationships, but detrimental. And also, despite you distortions, they point to women being attracted to the dark triad (with men possibly initially attracted to one and only one aspect of it), and to that attraction being tied hormonally to …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 08:46 AM
1

There is so much more I'd like to respond to on here. But I'm not the kind of man who has a lot of time. :<
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 05:38 AM
2

There is a tremendous amount of value in what has been posted. You are making a mountain out of less than nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/14 05:33 AM
2

I really don't know where this is losing all of you. The study found that men with lower voices are attractive to women. Low voiced men have higher levels of testosterone which affected their vocal cords during puberty. High testosterone is linked to behaviors one might easily characterize as dark triad. The study then tested those men with lower voices to see if they had higher quality sperm. They did not. Having a vasectomy wouldn't change anything about your voice, and therefore your attracti…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 10:21 AM
2

The studies cited here can be succinctly summed up in something that is not revolutionary: There is a big difference between love and infatuation, and you cannot base a relationship on the latter. Of course, the studies say more then that. Despite you distortions, they point to women being attracted to the dark triad (with men possibly initially attracted to one and only one aspect of it), and to that attraction being tied hormonally to her ovulation cycle. If you can't base a relationship on th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 10:02 AM
10

The tl:dr of just about every study you posted had the same point: When looking for a partner for casual sex, people look for different traits than they would with someone with whom they want to engage in a long term relationship. These traits that are desirable in a hook up do not apply to relationships. Some of the studies you posted specifically focused on women. Some were not gender specific at all, and some found nearly identical behaviors between men and women. One. Not some. One study was…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 09:08 AM
1

The first three links are the only ones that do not open to some sort of free version. I'll edit the second one with the pdf you found.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 07:15 AM
1

Relax, this isn't a competition. No. It's a debate. Except that it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/14 07:12 AM
1

So far, the number presented on this thread sits at an astonishing... 0. This would be the place, this would be the time. No? K.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/14 09:03 AM
5

Two more studies I find interesting. Behavioral Confirmation of Everyday Sadism Past research on socially aversive personalities has focused on subclinical psychopathy, subclinical narcissism, and Machiavellianism—the “Dark Triad” of personality. In the research reported here, we evaluated whether an everyday form of sadism should be added to that list. Acts of apparent cruelty were captured using two laboratory procedures, and we showed that such behavior could be predicted with two measures of…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/14 08:56 AM
1

Responding to Lifter ate up all my time tonight. :/
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/14 09:26 AM
1

From the University of Washington School of Medicine webpage on ethics: "As a general rule, deception is not acceptable when doing research with humans. Using deception jeopardizes the integrity of the informed consent process and can potentially harm your participants." Blatantly absurd and likely out of context. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_experiment "A blind or blinded experiment is a test or experiment in which information about the test that might lead to bias in the results is conce…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/14 09:13 AM
2

Absolutely fine. But you have picked some poor timing for me. I'm not trying to duck out, but it will have to wait until this evening.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 07:15 PM
2

As a separate thread topic, you mean? Or a post here? Like I said, I posted all of them in a recent tread. Someone was kind enough to post the abstracts and links for the first three for me there. If you want all of them, you'll have to wait until this evening as I have responsibilities right now. Also, I might add, these studies are not hard to track down on your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 07:09 PM
1

Hell, even if you're to say that we have "proof" that men and women are consistently behaviorally different as a result of biology (which I myself believe is the case, though I'm not sure to what degree), there's nothing to define what the social/legal implications of this are/should be. I agree. And that's exactly where the debate should be focused. But as for the fallibility of testing here, I beg to differ. If the question is in dealing with people, in most of these the subject is fooled and …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 06:41 PM
3

Oh yes. The Red Pill has some deep pockets. : / There is no squabble here. Eleven studies is consensus. At least as far as what can be explained by them. Which, as I said, is limited. If the other side wants to bring its countless studies, then bring them. Count up. Make it more than eleven. I might add that the other side here is quite comfortable with academic approaches to this subject, even founding a whole class collegiate study, so long as the bias is in their favor. And I do use the word …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 05:37 PM
2

I'm not going to keep replying to you. Reported for constant personal attacks.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 05:20 PM
12

In a recent thread, I produced eleven peer reviewed studies which I think adequately prove The Red Pill's starting position. Women are attracted to social dominance and "dark triad" personality types, and engage in long term relationships with men for whom they feel less sexual attraction. Beyond that, there's the growing list of studies which prove that gender is not a social construct. Unfortunately, in our current political climate, that's the extent of the research that has been done, and Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/14 07:13 AM
5

Proponents of the nice guy stereotype argue that women often say they wish to date kind, sensitive men, but, in reality, still choose to date macho men over nice guys, especially if the macho men are more physically attractive. [...] Results supported the nice guy stereotype. Lower levels of agreeableness predicted more less-committed, casual, sexual relationships. The results support the nice guy stereotype, which contradicts what is asserted in the XKCD comic. This is consistent with TRP think…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 11:43 PM
3

You mean there are two? The burden is on you to say that the dark triad style is both effective and morally permissible. Urbaniak GC, Kilmann PR. Niceness and Dating Success: A Further Test of the Nice Guy Stereotype. Sex Roles. Back MD, Schmukle SC, Egloff B. Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Tracy JL, Beall AT. Happy guys finish last: the impact of emotion expressions on se…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 09:50 PM
1

Radical feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 07:29 AM
4

So is the man on the left a scientist? The number of studies that prove that women are overwhelmingly attracted to dark triad personality types has doubled since just I've been paying attention to them. What the man on the left is saying is reproducible scientific fact. Where is that kind of proof for the blue pill ideas expressed by the man on the right? crickets. Instead of belittling the man on the left for expressing the reality of the situation, we should call out the man on the right for d…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/14 07:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter