TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

throwthetrash15 Archive

View 1 posts and 204 comments by throwthetrash15 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

Social Issuesthrowthetrash15/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:47 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

The "attempt more" thing is stupid anyway because if you take into account a success as an attempt, it clearly shows more men are actually trying suicide. They're just more successful too.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 06:44 AM
44

I'm not sure what happened to you in the last part of your sentence, but allowing men to be raped in film is a good thing. Censorship of art like that is the same as not wanting complex female characters as a feminist because the women are depicted as not being perfect.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:45 PM
4

He never said to refuse them.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 06:37 AM
4

The comic doesn't even really fit though. This is a woman who literally acts like a moron, and then when something is explained to her as if she is a moron, she claims sexism. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 05:43 AM
1

As u/RobDog101 pointed out, it's closer to lynching. The public condemns the actual victim and then "executes" them by ruining their life, losing their employment, etc, based on one person's word.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 11:43 PM
9

Even if it was posed, they don't get actors. These would have been actual workers.
/r/MensRights10/04/16 06:46 AM
1

pls to teech m3 best grammer senp4i!!!!
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:04 PM
1

You used an anecdote to say- what, exactly? That capitalism isn't about making money?
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:25 PM
0

Men don't talk about their feelings because that's not what men do. Talking about your feelings would therefore be unmanly. We do talk about it. I never said we don't. If people talk about their feelings publicly or to people they don't know extremely well, it is because they feel the 'need to advertise'. This suggests that openly talking about your feelings is needy and a sign of low self esteem or insecurity. I didn't mean it in a pejorative way. It's just that men don't feel like people need …
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:24 PM
0

... Tear ducts are controlled by your biological make up. It is impossible to cry further than they allow. Tear ducts determine tear amounts. Not the other way.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:35 PM
0

No. That's the definition of commercialism. What's the point of owning a factor, then? To drive your profits into the ground? Capitalism increases profit for all concerned - the owner, the worker, and the consumer. No, it is simply a system where people exchange goods for other goods or services. People get screwed all the time due to things like low supply increasing food prices, or high supply and limited demand giving limited profit. Commercialism will increase profit for the owners, by as yo…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 12:03 PM
2

But even putting that aside, if men are just more prone to only confiding in a few close people ... what happens when we don't have anyone close enough to confide in? Suicide, as I said.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:24 AM
5

The fact that men are not allowed to be vulnerable or feminine is a real issue and it's part of the suicide issue. We are allowed, we do it, it's just that we don't do it with everyone that is the whole point. As I said, We really only open our inner most thoughts to those we really trust because we don't feel the need to go around and advertise it. We are emotional, we allow ourselves to be vulnerable, but only with those we trust. Another issue is that we expect men to be these providers and d…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:13 AM
1

US is not capitalist although they certainly like to hear that they are. With capitalism everyone gets a fair deal - the owner, the worker, and the customer all profit. You what mate? Capitalism is an economic system based on private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Getting a fair deal isn't a part of that. The whole point of capitalism is to get as much profit as possible. If America was capitalist the people working at different locations of McDonalds would …
/r/MensRights08/04/16 10:35 AM
2

The problem isnt crying or talking about your feelings. The problem is that for the majority of western men life is shit. Life sucks, you have shit options, and no one GAF whether you even live or die. I stated this above. The answer is for women to lose their privileges until we reach equilibrium where men and women commit equal amounts of suicide. No, that's like saying in order to treat a missing leg you need to amputate the other. The solution is to reduce suicide, or fix the leg, not ensure…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 09:59 AM
0

Sorry, I would know. Apparently anecdotes trump biological science. My "male tear ducts" react with a significant difference since I lowered my T from 'average adult male' to 'lower than adult women' (ie 0). Are you trans? Even if you are, you are showing extreme lack of knowledge in both hormones and tear ducts. Even adult women still have Testosterone in them, they just have a significantly lower amount, but it is still a large amount. The tear ducts do not change size due to hormones, hormone…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 06:39 AM
2

There remains no such thing as a free lunch. One leaves you sitting on a waiting list for years, the other doesn't. One leaves you in debt for the rest of your life, the other doesn't. In a socialist system you have the option to pay and receive it immediately. In a capitalist one, you only have one option, and the majority of people are going to get the short stick because of it. There are always trade-offs to consider, at least so long as the scarcity of resources remains in play. Scarcity wil…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 06:35 AM
0

The whole nature vs nurture things is pointless because it all leads back to nature. Whatever we as a "society" do, it is inherently natural.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 06:16 AM
-1

Sorry, what? That's quite wrong. Male tear ducts are different and are made in such a way that inhibits and slows the release of tears.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:55 AM
1

Non sequitur much? Last I checked, heavily socialist countries have similar biases in the availability of their social services. The structure of the economy has got nothing to do with it. Compare the programs of the US and Western Europe. One is government funded all the way, the other is privately funded. One is based on helping people, the other is based on making money. What, to the socialist, is an opportunity for a government program is, to the capitalist, an under-served market. The socia…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:45 AM
13

Up until the age of 8 or 9, boys cry the same amount as girls and then they're taught to stop. They're not allowed to anymore. He thinks society "teaches" males to not cry. This is patently false. Males are biologically hardwired not to, or at least make it more difficult. Also, he believes that the solution is to make males more open to crying, or being more open to being overly emotional. In other words, be more like females.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:37 AM
28

He doesn't understand the "problem". Men aren't as emotionally open as women. We really only open our inner most thoughts to those we really trust because we don't feel the need to go around and advertise it. We only tell people when it's necessary, it just so happens that those who need to talk are those with no one to talk to. The problem isn't "society" telling us to "man-up", it's the lack of professional and affordable mental health programs open to men combined with the types of high-stres…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 02:26 AM
3

The truth of why a woman would want her man to get vasectomy: to make sure other women can't have his kids competing for his money that "should be hers". I'd say it's more she can't be fucked getting a condom.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 08:18 PM
1

Or killing and subjugating people in third world countries or even at home to further the profit/consumer/growth madness? Killing brown peoples is the ultimate turn on... Because the 95% of men who have ever fought in wars wanted to go there, right? Conscription has never been in force, right? The millions sent into the meat grinder of Belgium wanted to die, right? The thousands in Iraq and Afghanistan decided to invade, right? The millions of men who join the military because they have no futur…
/r/MensRights01/04/16 03:46 AM
2

Many native Americans actually prefer Indian.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 10:23 PM
2

"He did everything but hit me" Case fucking closed. Who rapes someone without one bit of physical (non-sexual) contact? Unless you were going "I want ya tits baby" and she did nothing but say "No" and got fucked anyway, then it's highly suspect.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 07:46 AM
9

I wasnt on birth control. So she lied about being on birth control, which is pretty big lie and can be construed as rape due to omission of very important facts that influence a decision. I said"trust me." And clearly she is not to be, having lied about the birth control. He tried to throw me off but he was in the moment. This doesn't sound at all like he tried to pull out. It sounds like he wanted to stop, and tried to stop her, but he had an erections as is very common in rapes, and she took t…
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:37 PM
9

Children are not pawns in a chess game between the parents. Sure, but in this case he is angry because of his mother's situation, a mother who has not told him the truth, and will probably come round to love his father and resent the mother if the truth was let out. I doubt he would want to live in the house of a woman who raped his father and is now only coming back for support when it's convenient.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:33 PM
1

It wasn't an actual attractiveness to fat, it was a desire for wealth. Fat people were the wealthy ones, as they could afford excess and gluttony.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 10:35 AM
1

No one is denying the sexes are different, that's not what you argued. You argued that men are the only ones who "evolve" and women are vampiric creatures.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:11 PM
1

You are acting like a petulant child now. It doesn't really help your case.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:04 PM
1

I think it's hyperbole to say that women couldn't fight in it, yes. That's not what we're talking about though.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:03 PM
1

This is cancer.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:02 PM
0

I have studied biology at university, as have two other people here who refuted you.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 11:02 PM
0

If men and women do not evolve traits in comparative isolation to each other then explain how any traits evolve on the Y chromosome? They don't "evolve" on the Y chromosome. The X chromosome carries most mutations, and women have two. So mutations are more likely to show in males as the Y chromosome cannot "counteract" the X chromosome. Remember women do not have not pass on the Y chromosome. Only men have it. Only men pass it on. Correct. Therefore if all evolution is done equally together betw…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:50 PM
0

we didn't evolve from apes, we evolved from an apelike ancestor, whose descendants split, some evolving into humans and other lineages evolving into the ape types so we are cousins, I guess, with apes Very basically yes. possible still close enough to interbreed with bonobos and or maybe orangutans No. The closest species to us is the Chimpanzee. We cannot interbreed with them. That is the whole meaning of "species". A new species is formed when it can no longer breed with it's ancestors.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:42 PM
1

Was World War 2 hyperbole?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 10:39 PM
7

Or did men equally evolve the nipple as females did? Nope. Females evolved the nipple! We both have nipples. Men have been subjected to ten times the selective pressures as women. People, don't evolve, species do. It's not about whether you are able to aim a rifle, it's about whether you have a mutation and can pass on children or not. Men Humans did all the evolving that made people, people. FTFY Women got the results of all that natural selection passively, the same way men didn't evolve the n…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:06 AM
1

Prostate cancer is sexist. It only affects men. Breast cancer affects both. Only women are helped by breast cancer awareness things.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:24 PM
1

I don't think I'm the one making it about gender when I've gone throughout my life seeing "breast cancer awareness" months take up 1/4th of the year, and Movember being called sexist.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:15 AM
17

Probably because BC is much less common than other cancers, has a high survival rate, and gets a vast majority of funding, most of which doesn't actually go towards finding a cure when most other cancers are strapped for cash.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:19 PM
3

Not entrapment. Undercover cops sting girls for this all the time. If she takes the money it is illegal. Only if they're actual prostitutes. Entrapment is when you normally wouldn't do it, how many times do I have to say this? Look you issue isn't with me. Never said it was.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:07 AM
3

The cop asks you for sexual favors for money in an attempt to get a charge for solicitation. You are prostituting yourself, but you normally wouldn't. Hence, entrapment.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:50 AM
3

How did the cop force you? It doesn't matter how, or even if. Entrapment doesn't require force. You willingly gave your money to a hooker. It was the reverse situation. The cop wanted to pay someone who wasn't a prostitute. Hence the entrapment. You wouldn't normally do it, and there are reasons you might: money problems being one. Doesn't matter that the cop found the hooker, provided you the money, and the hooker is actually a cop. It is still your crime. That's not what we're discussing thoug…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:39 AM
4

No, but coercion by a police officer into doing something you normally wouldn't is entrapment. It doesn't matter if they lie or not, if they make you do something you normally wouldn't, it's entrapment.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 07:30 AM
5

and can even lie to you to get you to commit crimes. It's entrapment if you normally wouldn't do it. Like if a cop lies and says prostitution isn't illegal to someone, then gets them to suck 'em off for $50. The person would normally not have done that, especially without being coerced by a cop, and it's therefore entrapment.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:48 AM
-5

The new "Ghost-busters" film will be the most disappointing thing since my son. I mean, how much more could you possibly fuck up the entire legacy of Ghost-busters? And while my son eventually hanged himself in the bathroom of a gas station, the unfortunate reality of the Ghost-busters reboot is that it'll be around. Forever. It will never go away. It will never be undone. And if you're an SJW who says his least favorite scene in the series was "He has no dick" scene because it was "trans phobic…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:21 PM
1

Looks like the downvotes went on him, not u/OnlyRev0lutions
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:31 AM
1

Not really. The Europe of Constantine is very much divorced from the current racial make up of Europe, in contrast to the Albanians. The Romans who were forced to convert are no where near similar to modern French, Romanians, Spaniards or Italians. The closest is Sardinian. The vast majority of Europe's current racial mix were Christians as default.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:01 AM
0

This is all so off topic it's ridiculous You brought it here. you said there are no native white European Muslims and I corrected you. I said there were no native Muslims. The other guy was talking about white Muslims. Albanians are not native Muslims, they were conquered and forced to convert.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:46 AM
1

It's not Constantinople lol Except that's what Istanbul means: Constantinople. and for all intents and purposes that's not Europe. Except for the fact that none of that is true. The only reason that Turkey is being considered for EU ascendance is because of Thrace. Geographers place Thrace in Europe for a reason. Nation borders don't determine the continents. You have no understanding of this, and it clearly shows. I'm not talking about modern immigration, are you just being willfully obtuse? I …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:50 AM
1

It's still a a part of Europe, unlike your comment seemed to show: The only people of Turkic descent in Europe are Tatars and the Turkish minority in Bulgaria. Completely forgetting the ~10 million Turkic Muslims in Constantinople and the other millions in Thrace. Also, the significant amount in Germany and other European nations that had exchange programs.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:13 AM
1

Constantinople doesn't exist anymore, it's Istanbul and only half of it is in the European continent. It's still part of Europe. Just because it's called Constantinople in a different language doesn't mean it isn't European.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 04:05 AM
0

What do you mean culturally native? Every culture is influenced by other cultures, I will tell you this much that a Bosnian Muslim has more similarity culturally with a Bosnian Serb or Croat than he does with a Turk or shqiptar. Some cultures develop a lot further from the original. Turkey isn't in Europe, and there are very few mixed Turk people in the Balkans (at least in the former Yugoslavia) "Ottoman rape babies" is just a meme kid. Constantinople is Asian?
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:52 AM
1

If being conquered and forced to convert doesn't make you native than European Christians aren't native either. They are a lot less culturally native. The only people of Turkic descent in Europe are Tatars and the Turkish minority in Bulgaria. ...And the Turks in Turkey, all the the people of mixed descent throughout the Balkans, the Caucasus, etc.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:45 AM
0

They are not native Muslims, they were conquered and forced to convert or are Turkic colonists.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:05 AM
3

There exists no privilege from race or gender, merely the fact that people are held down, than up. If you have money, you now have millions of friends who want nothing more than to see you as president. If you are black, you simply have a racist judge. If you are rich and black, the judge is your friend. It's all about the benjamins.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:04 AM
3

He'd probably have earned at least 1.5-2.5 times that amount in those years by working.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 12:51 AM
1

You get paid less than men The Pew research linked takes nothing into account besides income of all asked, and you're trying to extrapolate some stupid sexism thing here?. That is retarded. You typically pay more for shampoo You don't have to. Go ahead, buy some products designed for men. When you wake up in the morning with dry, frizzy hair that is damaged to missing ingredients, you'll understand why you buy the women's products. Men's products simply have less ingredients and cheaper primary …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 12:49 AM
6

I think that answers your question. There is a reason it's "Listen and Believe(TM)", not "Listen and corroborate, fact check and finally come to the correct conclusion."
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:08 AM
1

Not relevant in any way.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 07:36 PM
1

Not necessarily. Throughout history, there have been corporations which governed themselves and other nations. It's synonymous with companies, anyway. This isn't even relevant though, I've yet to see you justify companies control these essential things.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 12:06 PM
1

Another hoax vaccine or is this real? Has this proven effective in independant research? No, i dont trust the manufacturers research. What are the contraindications? How many severe problems per 100 vaccines? Any deaths? I think after the microencephalitis cases, caused by vaccinating the pregnant woman (brazilian institute of medicine), we should be more careful. Yes, the zicka thing is a hoax. o_o Do you prefer the 2.4% risk of getting HPV or the 1.3% risk of getting severy harmed by the vacci…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:43 AM
1

The least serious in this case has been campaigning a hardline stance since at least the 70s and hasn't backed down?
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:39 AM
1

Do tell how consigning roads to corporations is a good idea. Do tell how it's a good idea to leave emergency services to corporations. Do tell how it's a good idea to leave every man the himself.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:38 AM
1

Wow, this post reeks of transphobia. Doubting your story due to it's highly doubtful narrative, numerous errors on your part to hold it, and non-confirmation of your supposed boyfriend's part is transphobic now? You don't think it's natural that op wants to have a girlfriend while also having balls in his mouth? I think it's natural because whatever nature does is natural, but it's not normal and highly doubtful. I mean, this alone is obvious troll. What's the point of having a "girlfriend" if t…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 10:49 AM
1

Is he really your SO?
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:10 AM
1

And yet you claim to be his boyfriend. Any actual trans person would not do that. You've failed at your own game.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 04:05 AM
1

Which is why your story makes no sense. u/cl3nly is male. He says he went on a date with his girlfriend. You claim that you were his boyfriend, when he has a girlfriend. At least try and hold a proper narrative when trolling, dude.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 01:16 AM
0

there is no need to quote you and then reply to those quotes. Except there is, what you are doing is ridiculous. No, according to everybody. Everybody, excluding Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas, The Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia Botswana Bougainville Brazil British Indian Ocean British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina F…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:46 PM
0

You know which one. Which what? Why don't you format properly? There is button right beneath the text box. Russia was justified in invading Georgia. According Russia, and Russia alone. I am just making fun of yo at this point, the fact that you do not comprehend makes it even funnier. You are clearly easily amused, then, which goes with you half-witted Russian apologetics.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:48 PM
1

If it was legalized, then this fine would make sense. I'm not familiar with US laws, but Aus ones are quite good.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:38 PM
0

That sentence does not make any sense. Neither does that without context. Which sentence? Ukraine is complicated Russia invaded. There is no excuse. and Georgia was asking for it. How? Because they owned land that Russia wanted? Worse than the fucking Zulus in Civ5... And? Better nuke them before their nuke defences get any better. /s That sentence does not make any sense without context.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:29 PM
2

I don't see what's wrong with this. If they're unlicensed, they're unregulated, if they're unregulated, you cannot be sure if the workers are trafficked or not. There is a reason for prostitution licenses.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 01:00 PM
0

Okay, so for the last several hundred years it has been Russian. Your point? The land was never "Russian" as you claimed forever. Evidently you do not know what the word 'invasion' means. Evidently you don't, unless you believe Ukraine and Georgia to be simple vacations with guns and artillery. Cool story bro, tell me more about how their smaller and more professional army will manage to invade and conquer the American Navy, and Freedom™. It doesn't mean they're going to invade the U.S, moron, s…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:58 PM
1

Georgia attacked Russia. According to Russia. According to the international community and extensive investigations, Russian backed rebels shelled Georgian villages. Georgia went to stop them. Georgia never crossed the Russian border because the rebels were in Georgian land. Russia invaded. Russia attacked Georgia. The Crimea is Russian, always has been. Except for the almost 14 billion years before the 1700s. It has been Greek, Turkic, Hunnic, Slavic and Mongolian, but only recently Russian aft…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:45 PM
2

When people are shown in media as having died it's like once a month. Of course they wont care.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:38 PM
2

Good thing Russia has no interest in expansion. Where have you been the past 15 years? Russia has tried to gain territory in Georgia, has taken Crimea and is now working on getting Ukraine parceled up like Romania/Moldova so they can make them client states. This is all expansion. They are focusing on securing their defences Forward defence, then huh? rebuilding their brown water fleets Sure. and generally professionalizing their military. For expansion.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 12:34 PM
2

Say Russia keeps expanding and grows to be a credible European threat. If a war starts elsewhere, the draft is very likely, as with Vietnam, because you can't fight in Asia/Africa/ME and garrison Europe at the same time.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 05:44 AM
2

No thanks.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:13 AM
8

Obviously a disgusting misogybeard!
/r/MensRights19/02/16 07:59 AM
0

Europe was completely devastated after World War Two. Their military budgets were woeful, their equipment more so. That would be like saying a cripple could defend against a body builder.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:49 PM
0

But the two most recent draft wars. Vietnam and Korea, were all political posturing. Vietnam was not a threat to America. North Korea was also not a threat to America. Yes, but conscription was necessary to maintain a strong presence in Europe against the Soviets and still have a large enough military to defeat the enemy.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 12:54 PM
1

It is slavery, but in all cases where it has been activated in the US, the draft was necessary. In order to defeat Nazism, the draft was necessary. In order to win in Vietnam, the draft was necessary. I'll be the first to be anti-war, but as soon as we start, I'm pro-draft but still anti-war, especially in the Vietnam war scenario. The US could not have defeat the north Vietnamese and defended Europe against a possible Soviet incursion without the draft.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 12:30 PM
2

If someone in a physical sport falls unconscious, you stop. If someone during sex fall unconscious, you stop. If someone falls unconscious while drinking, you stop them from trying again. How is that feminist behavior? It's common sense.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 11:48 PM
9

I know you're joking, but for those who think it does, you don't prosecute simply for no rape evidence- you prosecute based on evidence pointing to negligence.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 11:01 PM
3

How convenient that you forget public welfare exists.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 12:14 PM
3

The father perhaps but that assumes that you know who the father is, that the father isn't also in prison, that the father wants anything to do with the child, and the father doesn't have any other disqualifying issues. Simple solution, ask the mother who the father is, do a DNA test, and give equal custody if he is in prison, full custody if not with visitation in prison if permission is granted by him.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:08 PM
2

If you're trying to fish for r/SRS material, don't be so obvious. You have to lead people on, start small, but semi-controversial, leading the victims on, until the very end when you reveal this shit. Don't start with the big bait. Honestly, I'd get out of the whole baiting thing while you can. You have no proficiency in it at all.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:03 PM
7

What was the point in coming here, then? If you have locked your mind behind a thick wall impervious to reason, why have a discussion or questioning? This is as stupid as... itself. It's so stupid, nothing fucking compares.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:26 PM
6

“Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” So it still isn't rape against men if they are forced to penetrate, or if they are forced to perform oral sex on a women. This is a clear example of women being able to get away with the much lesser crime of sexual assault if they are even charged, but men can't do the same. Also, seeing as the women who actually are cha…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:19 PM
2

Well statistically, women are more likely to be victims of rape and domestic violence. (most female homicides were committed by their partner) It is known that in most countries in the world, men have nowhere to turn if they are abused by a female partner, and many times women kill their partners, they are excused due to "domestic violence" which is not proven. If domestic violence and murder against men isn't taken seriously by many police forces globally, and in many instances isn't a crime, w…
/r/MensRights07/02/16 12:15 PM
2

There was a draft for Vietnam, and that was because the regular forces couldn't guard Europe and fight there at the same time. It only takes that much. Say Russia continues it's policies for the next few decades, or China gets more aggressive and we end up in Cold War 2. It would only take a small war in some hole to get the draft up and running.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 09:58 AM
1

And only several don't celebrate IWD.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:55 AM
0

Why the fuck is this here? It's not necessary in a serious conversation.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:32 AM
11

I'm not a medical professional, but I would imagine that a child screaming during surgery, something that is insanely. Fucking. Loud. could collapse a lung that is very weak due to being a newborn. If children want a parent or protection, they will make it known. And newborns aren't known to have strong bodies.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 06:30 AM
1

This is what gets me with many books. Women do use male names when writing, but I don't care about that. So when I look one up I'm like "Yo, wtf."
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:58 PM
1

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 01:39 PM
42

Can people stop masturbating in libraries, though? No. It's nice ambiance, you'll get used to it. fap fap fap fap fap
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:24 AM
7

towards women no one except their own, until you have second thoughts. They eat their own, as they've so many times. If this is the right person, I remember the time a few years back where the feminist mods of r/LGBT literally said she wanted to throw the gays under the bus (that exact phrasing) because they'd "won their rights" and now it was women's feminist's turn to become more equal.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 11:21 AM
3

Kind of, you are. By placing some women at the top too, above the top 100 subbed, you are placing all the other men, even the 101-99 most subbed, below them. Less exposure because vagina.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:48 PM
-1

And that is wrong, how? They clearly earned it.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:09 AM
1

Portwood is working on obtaining a joint custody agreement with her ex-boyfriend Gary Shirley So either she can't and is trying to get him to capitulate, or she is allowed to still have the kids and is trying to get him to capitulate. If it is the latter, the law has failed. If it is the latter, the law is clearly sexist. No man would get away with this.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 06:06 AM
1

I'd wager many of the people have cross membership to the groups at these events.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 02:53 PM
9

You thought the management changed? They still have the same goals. The last CEO was just a scapegoat. The press releases they had a while back changed nothing.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:44 AM
3

I just wish it was called something else, so ineligible people are more likely to apply and get rejected. Milo has stated that anyone can apply "As long as you identify as white male." He doesn't want to ignore the other parts of the collective MRM/Gamergate/Sad Puppies/etc. movement. It's kinda like saying "I know there are free copies of films online, but I don't recommend you look for them."
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:43 AM
3

BLM is pretty feminist based/supported.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 11:39 AM
2

I think "How can she slap?" is indicative of India.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 05:43 AM
4

It's not your country, you have no idea what you're talking about. Proportional representation is actually the point of Canada's democracy. It's not democracy if the cabinet doesn't make up the voted politicians. If 70% of those voted in are men, then 70% of the cabinet should be men. They are the best qualified according to the party who put them up for election.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 05:41 AM
1

How many people are showing up?
/r/MensRights24/01/16 11:44 AM
1

Nah, Bernie doesn't seem like that kinda guy. He did spend years trying to get his positions mainstream, he didn't pull a Hillary and conduct all policy on the polls. It would seem like a complete 180 in his character to do that, but he could also be too far into the race to not do feminist rhetoric like that.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 08:31 AM
8

they can't go around advertising these things publicly Well, yeah, in many places it's illegal. Most "equality" laws say "No male only things" rather than "No single-sex things."
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:48 AM
3

Yeah, sounds like feminist rhetoric; "If your not a feminist, your a sexist."
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:47 AM
1

or even an illegal alien! Shh!
/r/MensRights13/01/16 11:59 AM
1

Should have differentiated between feminist academia and academia at large.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 03:03 AM
2

Most military hardware isn't prototyped as a test, but a proof of concept of what it does and how for investors/military staff using it.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 01:37 AM
-1

You can't develop a gauss cannon, or a submarine through only experience.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 12:58 AM
2

I was talking about military academia.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:57 PM
3

Academia speculates? Practical people live? My friend, without theory, the militaries of the world would not have the amazing live saving abilities it does today. Blood transplants? Displacement body armour? Helicopter medical transports? All developed by theoretical minds far from the wars of the world.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:30 PM
1

Maybe they'll just beat a dead horse to get his just desserts?
/r/MensRights09/01/16 12:44 AM
2

and practically breaking my things. My computer, my Xbox One (which I bought) and my souvenirs Was probably trying to save you, man. Joking aside, she sounds like a cunt. My mother said I did drugs and was stupid and a sociopath (never done illegal drugs, got back to back 4.0 semesters, and love people beyond imagine). This is going to happen no matter what. And the police will instinctively take the mother's side because a lot of the home calls they will get are from parents, not children, and …
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:31 AM
2

That's pretty bullshit then.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 12:48 AM
4

I think someone elsewhere said he should because other rapists don't go to prison.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:47 AM
51

Is the money taxable? Surely he could also sue the police, court, judge and woman who all got him into prison?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 09:46 AM
3

I've always had great respect for men who were absolutely willing to end there lives to secure other's safety, with no second thoughts. It really takes a certain individual to do this, and women rarely do comparatively. I think it really shows when society "gives up" on men, but still expects the best out of the supposed dregs.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 11:40 AM
1

I know readers are allowed to criticise. I just think our time is worthlessly spent on this. This person wont change and they have every right to make their comics, and I support them. I don't think any form of art should be changed or censored by the public's pressure.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 11:32 PM
5

You're telling me a basic motion trying to create more space isn't violence?!??!
/r/MensRights28/12/15 11:17 PM
0

Not really. She has every right to do this, it's usually feminists that are authoritarian and try to control art.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 10:42 PM
0

I think it's a good criticism, but the author of the material has every right to only feature violence against men, just as you can write fanfiction with violence only towards women, or all inclusive violence, or no violence at all. The fact that this sub downvoted me is odd, because I thought we were against the authoritarian approaches to art oh so prevalent in feminism.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 02:46 PM
0

Eh, this is kinda silly. It's her work, she can do what she wants with it and you don't have to read it.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 10:40 AM
8

Just found out it's mostly touted by businesses, and they're pretty well informed I would imagine with marketing.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 03:40 PM
83

Of course, how dare a man budget in a very economically dangerous period. How dare he want to make sure he can still pay the bills at the end of December. This whole things is bullshit anyway. 80% of household budgets are controlled by the women, so she is budgeting December with his money. Meaning she controls what he can do. Fucking ignorant, sexist pricks.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 10:59 AM
6

Context matters. Foreign wars? Sure. But being invaded? The draft is needed in the Baltic and Scandinavia to fend off Russian interests there, context matters.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 05:56 AM
1

It's absolutely disgusting when you can be charged for simply bringing a new take on history, or disputing facts. I didn't read the whole article, but this reminds of Europe where Holocaust denial can get you arrested. What happened to freedom of speech, or facts before ideologies? Disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:13 PM
2

Well that's pretty good, then. It would still be a little odd each time you whip it out, like "This ain't mine."
/r/MensRights06/12/15 08:30 PM
4

"The fact is, men are getting the short stick in life. And, why would you show sympathy to the disenfranchised? Bully them! Bully them with your feminism!"
/r/MensRights08/11/15 08:31 PM
1

But not girls?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 01:12 AM
2

If you make it clear at the beginning, but not after. If you start a men's only fitness centre, sure, but not if you start a fitness centre and then when women arrive turn them away. YOu have to make clear beforehand, I would say.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:25 PM
1

If that happens, they are annoying patrons and they should be ejected at the manager's discretion, just like in this case.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:22 PM
1

I was making a point. Replace it with "If they are selling erotic cakes and they deny you that service because it offends them you would get one with two penises, that is discrimination."
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:19 PM
6

If they do not realise that it was rape... it wasn't rape. Everyone knows the definition of rape, that being non-consensual sex (law varies on if men can be raped because stupidity). I guess you could argue that a rare oblivious person might not know, or be in denial due to abuse, but all the cases of rape being accused where the "victim" needed to be convinced has almost certainly turned out to be rubbish. Mattress girl is a perfect example.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:24 AM
3

It isn't very nice.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:21 AM
4

I absolutely disagree. We have no right to force people to bake us cakes even if the law says we do. You don't. But if a shop is selling a service, wedding cakes, and then denies you that service because of sexuality, that is discrimination. if I want to be reasonably free I have to recognize that I don't have the (moral) "right" to any particular service from free, private citizens. Again, you don't have that right. But if a business is selling something, such as beer, they shouldn't be able to…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:16 AM
6

Yeah, I'll upvote that.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:11 AM
10

So I should be able to go into a cake shop and order a custom cake with a raging penis inside of a vagina with red syrup spilling out, they don't have the right to deny making something so vulgar? No. If that is not what they are selling. If they are selling custom cakes for weddings where you can put names on it and they deny you that service because it is two men's names, that is discrimination. If two men came in and asked to have a penis cake when erotic cakes are not baked, that is not. It'…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:10 AM
6

Yes, but they shouldn't be allowed to say "You're black, get out. We don't sell to your kind." They should be allowed to say that those who have thieved against them they cannot come into the store, but something you cannot decide should not be a factor here.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:43 AM
4

What's the difference?
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:59 AM
1

If gay men want to act catty and without self control, they too can leave. But they don't. These types are the ones who go to these places, or the straight women who have a hens night at the bar. It's fine if you don't act up, but much of their actions piss of patrons.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:59 AM
1

So, the same people willing to use the force of the gov't to shutdown bakeries who refuse to participate in a gay wedding are upset that people walk into a bar and buy drinks. I never said that. I was talking about the women in the article who are demonizing the men at gay bars and go there because they are "objectified" by men at straight bars. I've no problem with them at gay bars as long as they don't act as bad as many of them do.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:56 AM
8

I was just borrowing the term. i didn't mean it as a literal "No one else allowed, lalalalalalalala!" type thing. I meant a place where gays could go and be themselves with the same people, away from the public which demonized them at the time.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:47 AM
53

I thought gay people were all about "business can't discriminate against their customers". We are. Which is why straight women are allowed into gay bars, though gays will get pissed off just like the Christian bakery did. You have no right, however, to deny service to either because of something they can't control.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 05:46 AM
141

This whole thing is fucked. Why should gays welcome you into a gay bar? The whole point of gay bars was to create a "safe space" away from the public gaze to partake in pleasures with the same sex when these same feminists were yelling at them for not being attracted to women or fucking them. Gay bars exist to serve gays, women or men, and straights do not fit the market they are catering to. Why the fuck are you complaining? This is like complaining that a helicopter construction company won't …
/r/MensRights31/10/15 10:21 PM
15

ADD is used as a byword for boystrous behavior. It got out of hand real fast.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 08:23 PM
5

They also don't whiteknights. Being a beta is terrible, I understand, but white knighting ain't gonna get you that booty.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:53 AM
4

The falsely accused would go to jail for sometime, not be murdered. Are you thick?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:50 AM
4

Gays are more likely to be murdered anyway. Just not in the womb.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:31 PM
11

http://nicememewebsitewebsitewebsitewebsitewebsite.website/
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:23 PM
8

...who have the ability to wish physics and all of science away?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:22 PM
0

how is him having to pay child support bad? he fathered 6 children. I was talking in general. but thats an assumption and we simply don't have enough information. That is exactly why I said we don't know te full situation.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 05:55 AM
0

I know, but it isn't active misandry on these people's part.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:50 PM
-7

I want to preface this by talking to OP and people who post these kind of things: Don't turn this place into SRS. These links into other subreddits do nothing good. Please stick to news stories and politiccs, etc. Okay, I don't know the full situation. Obviously, I think him having to pay CS is bad but if he threatened suicide, that can be considered abusive. However, if he merely said that he was not sure he could still provide for himself, his other kids and hers and that suicide was an option…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:46 PM
6

Get that bitch a job. Bitches hate jobs.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:41 PM
2

It's disposable income, no children, only rich kinky, kinky sex.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:40 PM
3

It's not misandry, it's gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 09:33 PM
15

I would like the money not be split by gender, but to be spent on victims regardless of gender, as all government programs should be.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:28 AM
2

Sick
/r/MensRights22/09/15 11:48 PM
19

Do you only accept gay dicks, or can you compromise?
/r/MensRights22/09/15 10:24 PM
2

I was stating a fact. The question was stupid. A place with no respect? Again, stating fact and you should rejoice that this "unrespectful" place doesn't ban people for disagreeing.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:58 AM
1

Edit- Do you see this r/mensrights? I asked a very polite and simple question and I have downvotes. You will never help the cause towards men's rights because you can't even run a good sub. Why is it this way? Why should society change for you if they can't even talk to you? You aren't serious, right? You were down voted because you asked a question that was stupid. You asked if she deserved her "contractually agreed upon payments" when there weren't any. HE deserves the money because it is his,…
/r/MensRights22/09/15 06:59 AM
3

How do you think they run the whole thing?
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:32 PM
7

It is fine to support your kids, obviously. Let me tell you why the institution is wrong though. My parents are both divorced. My mother only has me and brother at hers house for 2/3 days per week, yet my father is required, BY LAW, to give her $250~ per week, which absurd. The fact that the government takes a small cut to is disgusting. They're profiting off of other misfortune.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:31 PM
3

This isn't a throw away. She doesn't deserve any of the money. When he received the pension, she took $300000 with the power of attorney because, well he is brain dead, and then destroyed the house and built another for the same price in her name. Then she invested $600000 for herself. Now she is suing to get the final $200000, the final pittance of HIS money, designed to make HIS life easier, don't think that is despicable?
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:27 PM
12

Every time a payment is made, they take a percentage in interest.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:47 PM
28

Why does the government need to come in, demand payments, profit from it, and send people to prison when they know they cannot pay exorbitant amounts?
/r/MensRights21/09/15 05:43 PM
6

Exactly.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 04:37 PM
2

Thats the patriarchy, looking out for him! :D
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:58 PM
125

Oh, fuck you! Garbage is so much more clean.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:06 PM
899

Top kek, well played bitch. So, let me get this straight. He is brain damaged, confined to a wheelchair, has to live in a specialized home and has no income, and she wants to take his pension away? What in the fucking fuck? Now, this man is probably broken mentally and emotionally. He gets back from Afghanistan and she divorces him. Being incapable, he will never be able to look after his child and that means she will be the primary caretaker, using HIS pension which he NEEDS to survive, all bec…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 01:19 PM
2

This article clearly shows that is simply a perception problem here.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:11 PM
1

Then why not let the boys decide for themselves if you're going to let the girls decide too?
/r/MensRights19/09/15 11:10 PM
10

This is nothing new, it is how the media reports on everything. "Six people and three women were killed today..." Pay attention to most news stories and you'll notice.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 03:03 AM
2

There are literally subreddits making fun "meninists" because of the dumb shit you all say. You do realize that meninisists are a satire of feminists, and not in any way related to MRAs? Right? Or did you actually not see that, like the idiots who think the Onion is a real news source? No one takes neck beards seriously because all you complain about is how you think you're entitled to sex and discriminated against when you don't get what you want. Something something extreme straw man. Literall…
/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:24 AM
2

Have you got any info for Syd?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:22 PM
1

That's what feminists want them to be, pets to be played with at their leisure.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:18 PM
8

No, they're giving them a few minutes of fun and a tasty head to chew on before getting a different toy.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:26 AM
2

Did I say all men and all women? Besides, I'm sure if you talked to a woman during WW1 and asked if she wanted to the vote but had to go to the Western Front for it, she would say no.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:03 AM
2

There aren't any responsibilities attached to the vote. You're drawing this bizarre line from men's social responsibilities (conveniently overlooking women's social responsibilities) and claiming that is why they had the vote. Except, I'm not, and war is why they had the vote. Need I explain the French Revolutionary wars, Napoleon or WW1 again? If you look into the suffrage campaign and opposition to it, it is clear that opposition was based on women's perceived insufficiency when it came to the…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:49 AM
5

Sydney, Australia. Please no 18+ areas, I'm 17.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:22 AM
5

The Second and Third Reform Acts then expanded the franchise to many, many more men at a time when there was no conscription in the UK. Yes, and 40% of men did not have the vote, but they still had all the responsibilities tied with voting anyway, such as supplying food and shelter for the wife and children. Women did not have this 'luxury'. During WW1, suffrage campaigns were suspended in order to help the war effort. What has this got to do with anything? Everything was suspended that didn't d…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 09:06 AM
4

Only in the past few decades has been socially acceptable for women to have careers at all Yes, and this the meant that the man was entirely responsible for her. Women could still get jobs, it was just looked down upon, because that meant it was taken away from a man who now could not feed his wife and children. Women also did not need to share the income with the husband or make sure the children were fed, unlike men. You can see this in (somewhat) modern times in Persia, Arabia and Taliban con…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:43 AM
3

Would this still be allowed if it was men only, or whites only? I don't think so.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:30 AM
4

Yep. I tried to do the deed, just for kicks. I'm not into two semi-obese bags of flaps smack together for 30 minutes.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 10:21 AM
6

"Allahu Akbar! Goodbye, infidel!" "Uh, that is literally disgusting. You are stereotyping Muslims. I'm reporting this to my superior!"
/r/MensRights05/09/15 05:44 AM
1

Uh, wtf. She is complaining about violence and swearing. Did she not pass her ninth grade? I'm currently completely my HSC in Australia and we watch/read/write violent and vulgar things all the time (also feminism. Ingrained in schools). It is literally nothing.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 08:32 AM
20

You put an /s, but it is true. Going against feminist narratives are generally seen as sexist. It would be political suicide.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 11:58 AM
3

It is passive and covert. Female power fantasies involve social influence, especially over powerful men. I've heard of a Roman Emperor, not sure which one, who was essentially the most powerful man on earth, yet was controlled by his wife. She would tell him what to do, he would do it. In effect, she was the emperor, but did not bother with a public life. Ruling through a vessel was good enough.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:40 PM
1

After a couple hours, I saw that he has a rape face. Then I thought he actually was a rapist! But! Then I saw she was laughing, which encouraged him to drink more, so she knew he would black out! SHE'S A RAPIST!!! Joking aside, this poster is fucking sick. Of course the man wouldn't get drunk in that situation. He's the rapist! /s
/r/MensRights11/07/15 06:38 PM
7

You're made homeless no matter what because of the "primary aggressor" laws.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 12:15 AM
20

the film is dear zachary.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:58 AM
18

the film is dear zachary.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:58 AM
43

American teenager has committed suicide, much to the dismay of friends and family. Police say that he used a feminism to end his life. More at 5.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 05:53 AM
3

It shattered. That's not plastic.
/r/PussyPass08/05/15 07:13 PM
4

He clearly was abusive. However, seeing as she did not leave, it is most probable that she was annoying him, pissing him off and wouldn't shut up for him to speak. So, he hit her. When she emotionally abused him, he physically abused her. Neither is excusable, but it is very obvious she is in the wrong as well.
/r/PussyPass25/04/15 01:44 AM
12

Its a minimum required sentence. If it was a man they would most definitely get the full brunt of what the judge could cook up.
/r/PussyPass24/04/15 10:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter