TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thubtop Archive

View 0 posts and 92 comments by thubtop on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It is usually thought that a right ends where it infringes on somebody else's right. Killing your own child in the womb by tearing it into pieces alive is probably not the expression of "human rights" concerns. This is a very complex problem. To begin with, "free sex" is simply not compatible with the fact of reproduction; contraception relativized this to some degree, but not completely. Simply killing one's own children is probably not the best way to deal with the problem. It would be more in…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 09:59 AM
4

I understand this person and I could add personal histories. In today's situation, in the west, the game is truly over. One should go MGTOW and keep away from these people. It is not worth it. In today's silly society, it may be necessary to say that we do not believe that women are intrinsically bad; it is the current socioculture which allows them to behave in manifold bad ways, because everything is biased to protect them, no matter how bad they act. The stereotype that men are bad and women …
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 05:15 PM
3

Feminism is an ideology based on narcissism. All the boxes tick, among others, the virtue-signalling, the moral superiority, the pseudo empathy with collectives – but hate against the outgroup and individuals, etc..
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 11:47 AM
3

Feminism helps the economy double its productivity at the expense of the mental sanity of men and women alike. Now, calm down and seriously consider MGTOW: What a woman has to offer to a man is having sex, having children, and a family. Since this is not given to men by women because of feminism and its after-effects, men should give up sex (and the hopes for a good family life – that won't happen anyway with such women & such divorce laws), and one quickly finds out that one is "free" and "happ…
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/22 10:54 AM
18

Well, first, there is empathy, and if someone explains their misery, one may spontaneously agree and want to help. Until one is able to distinguish individual hardships from ideological claims about reality. That is indeed difficult. The mainstream culture portrays the world in a certain light, and being against feminism requires thinking for oneself and going against a few unjust accusations of not being empathic, compassionate, moral, a good person. This is difficult to oppose. The truth is, e…
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 11:21 AM
6

I would not agree with that wording. I am against "female privilege" disguised as "women's oppression" in feminist ideology. I am not against "rights"; I do not want to enslave women or something. It must be defined clearly what one is advocating for or opposing against. We have to fight against an ideological distortion of facts. Feminists claim oppression which does not or no longer exist, and legislation has given in and has stripped men of their rights and of their dignity. That is something…
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 10:39 AM
1

Don't believe such things. There is no way this could be survived before modern medicine. Caesarian section was invented by Caesar, everybody knows that ;-) He performed it many times on his pregnant legionaries between the battles.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 09:58 PM
12

They mostly come at my professional email which is neatly separated from my private intemperate pornsites addiction.
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/22 10:14 AM
15

Maybe I can sue the spammers with their viagra ads? They are usually adorned with naked girls, and unsolicited.
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/22 09:09 AM
1

It exposes the "pseudo-empathy" of their merely egoistic quest for personal advantages. They don't care about real misery, instead only for their own "misery" which is to not yet rule the world completely. I did not even mention the legal situation with divorce and child custody ...
/r/AntiFeminists21/03/22 08:18 AM
1

a) before all, I find JP quite convincing when he points out that the pseudo-historical view of feminism that mankind is an eternal fight between the sexes is appallingly silly. Men and women needed to collaborate all the time, and share the tasks for survival of the family. b) This brings me to the second point, which is the confusion created by the "equality" delusion of the industrial society. As we can see, everything is set for the decline of society, women don't marry, but are all promiscu…
/r/AntiFeminists20/03/22 10:31 PM
3

Just so you know, in European countries where prostitution was legal and visible and normalised, the feminists (successfully) fought (and keep fighting) to restrict it since decades. The only thing they really want is power.
/r/AntiFeminists22/01/22 08:30 PM
5

In an ideological battle, your argument will be diffamated / smeared instead of counter-argued. You either agree with their ideology, or nazi.
/r/AntiFeminists20/01/22 10:04 PM
2

"Don't buy at jews!"
/r/AntiFeminists14/11/21 03:51 PM
19

Collectivism: In the 1930s in Germany (and many other places ...): "Kauft nicht bei Juden". In the 1990s in India (and many other countries ...): "Be Indian, Buy Indian!"; Now: extreme gynocentrism: All women need to cooperate to defeat the imaginary "patriarchy". Let us introduce apartheid in order to be inclusive, diverse and open-minded ... An ingroup constitutes itself by hating the outgroup.
/r/AntiFeminists13/11/21 08:48 PM
1

You seem to be emotionally destabilised from your nasty ideology (and your hidden sexual desires). And you are just now "claiming oppression" yourself, but externalising all your hysterical hate and anger on your imaginary "enemy". I am not your enemy, but you are obviously my enemy. You are turning everything the wrong way :-) I won't be your "chauvinistic rapist", as much as you seem to like indulging in this imagery :-D I prefer MGTOW. Women like you do not create any sexual interest in me. I…
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 11:49 PM
1

I do not want that up. I do not want to discuss who to ban. Social media created entirely new problems for discussions, I know :-) Ideological bias is everywhere, I know :-) I cannot solve these problems. As I said, ideally, I want banning banned, then I can reply reasonably where it really needs to be heard. I see no meaning in only speaking up among people who share my views anyway, and be banned everywhere else. I have many bans on myself :-D
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 10:22 PM
4

This is a silly war of censorship. Let these maniacs talk. I am against feminism and its effects on society, that's why I am here. I am not anti-woman, and I would not interact with people who are anti-men. They just prove a point, that feminism is really about power, not equality. Anti-X means one is a racist, sexist, etc., one want to re-establish concentration camps or gulags and destroy society. However, free speech is mandatory. I would prefer if reddit simply would not allow banning and su…
/r/AntiFeminists04/11/21 07:52 PM
15

Western society is committing suicide. Unfortunately, the individuals have no say in that.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 10:01 AM
24

With 7 children, you are the winner anyway. Feminism is an ideology which will one day crash with reality, but this day has not yet come.
/r/AntiFeminists09/09/21 03:23 AM
2

I see. May their power soon be removed from them.
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 03:48 PM
1

Do I need to watch my tongue even here? ;-) This is even sadder than what I said ...
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 01:51 PM
7

It's a matter of "social construction of reality"; she believes in a different reality she is comfortable with. First, don't talk about it, second, if anything, just point out concrete cases, but don't sound like you want to convince her. That would not work anyway. With women on this topic, one must consider, feminism is a self-cherishing theory: It tells them they are rigiht in overpowering men, because men bad and women disadvantaged. Understand she sincerely believes that. Therefore, she can…
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:07 AM
1

Feminism gave women power, and with power comes violation of others. Equality and fairness do not exist; the complementarity of men and women was replaced with a power struggle which was won by women by keeping female privilege and gaining male dominance. Feminism has been planned and executed mostly by lesbians who also tried to turn hetero women over. I know because I saw that happening, decades ago. They are predators. Sheds a totally new light on the poor discriminated minorities, doesn't it…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/21 01:44 AM
1

Yes, thanks too, for bringing the attention to this interesting experiment. It is as if mankind became dumb in the last generation. They don't seem to understand the most basic insights, in every respect. This phenomenon is bigger than just "bad education" or any other explanation. They experience the psychological effect of "paradise (under overpopulation conditions)" in the human form. They have lost natural ethical impulses (replacing it with ideological virtue-signalling); they cannot pair-b…
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/21 07:03 PM
2

Collectives want power, not equality. Feminism is a wrong view of history and of biology and of society.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 12:11 PM
9

Women are killing their fetuses by the millions. Women think that abortion is a "right over their belly". Does this not compare enough?
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/21 10:19 AM
7

I think the observable reluctance to procreate or form durable bonds is comparable, ideological thoughts about the phenomenon, such as MGTOW, are cultural artefacts.
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/21 10:18 AM
4

It has been repeated 25 times. What else do you want? :-) Do you think mice changed evolutionarily over the course of 30 years?
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/21 10:16 AM
4

To begin with, it is an experiment with mice. Now we know for sure how mice are doing. For lack of opportunity to do the same experiment with humans, one can think about how this could be analogous to humans. The experiment as such is NOT "trying to compare" by "unfair generalisations". The experiment may give a hint as to how higher organisms react to overpopulation. If we look at the current situation of humanity, we cannot help noticing a number of similarities. increase and glorification of …
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/21 10:15 AM
9

Marriage is good for the children, they need a safe haven. It is good for cooperation between two people with two different tasks and abilities. It has no meaning whatsoever in modern western culture, as women try to be a kind of men, and nobody will want to raise children. Except for political activism in order to glorify gayness through taking over an "outdated" model (of marriage) in order to show off one's sexual desires. Kooyanisqatsi.
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 07:06 AM
2

Beside your real interest of not being censored, a personal advice: you should neither say nor think such things; it is unethical. Many people think they are "morally good" as long as they make up some reason why the victim of their violence phantasy is "morally bad". This is a wrong assumption; you are yourself morally bad. The lynchmob always believes to be good and their victim to be a heinous criminal – that is no proof for them being right in that assessment. And as for the entire community…
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/21 06:36 AM
-1

It is not a "crime against humanity", because it does not affect all of humanity. It is one of the various dark cultural habits of some cultures, and as such one can only wish that it is abolished by the respective cultures. Just like FGM, or tattoos, piercings, and all the other ugly and silly body modifications that there are (lip flocks, sharpening of teeth, cutting up the penis underside, etc.). Many cultures comprise behaviors found otherwise only in certain mental illnesses, including sacr…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 07:23 PM
3

these feminists got money for that. and nobody dares oppose them, because opposing them is misogyny -- they say.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 02:48 PM
1

I cannot speak for others, and I saw some low level talking, as everywhere. Focus on the idea, not on the lowest of the people who will bring everything down.
/r/AntiFeminists27/07/21 10:05 PM
2

Yes, I see. Some people go a bit too far with their expectations for others :-)
/r/MGTOW221/07/21 06:18 PM
2

Other people do not judge you -- this is your own low self-esteem; cheer up :-) A sane family will expect you to marry and have children, of course. They want to see their legacy to live on. Old people, and traditional people of any age, have a different view on marriage on the basis of different presuppositions. It would be very good to be married, IF the old situation (pre-1970s) would still exist. It is just very bad for a man to marry these days. If one would want to have children (strange t…
/r/MGTOW221/07/21 04:05 PM
5

simply MGTOW. do not interact with women until the laws have changed and women learned again to behave like humans.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/21 09:08 AM
1

fat is quite objective. i am a bit fat, for example. everybody can see that. "sexist hypocrite" can be true, but i cannot comment at the moment, as we do not have a concrete evidence at our hands. beside, the word "toxic" is an ideological buzzword, i would omit that, it makes no sense. furthermore, words such as "toxic" in the sense of destroying the consensus of our society, and hypocrite in the sense of wanting to blame others while being a rather bad and stupid idiot oneself is very much the…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 08:54 AM
0

what you are saying shows you do not respect free speech and you cannot understand that the truth is not insulting; it is in your own mind whether something is insulting. and insult does never ever trump freedom of speech. if somebody is insulting, well, you will most probably simply move away from that person. that is easy and straightforward. we cannot adapt standards to the lowest of people. if somebody insults me for whatever this person tries to attribute to me, how can I be insulted. Peopl…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 08:44 AM
-1

I would criticise rape hysteria and silly ideological buzzwords such as "body-shaming" which just try to reinterpret reality (If somebody is fat, one should be able to say that, because it is "true"; and the worst case, insulting is bad style, but not a crime). But I would not apply these silly concepts on men now, as if we would want to be as silly as those "woke" idiots with their endless sexist accusations. "Small dick" can be an insult only if small dick is a fact and small dick is considere…
/r/MensRights18/07/21 12:49 AM
1

"body-shaming of men" and "men also get raped" basically copies the woke nonsense. I do not feel left out if bullshit is not applied for men as well. rather, i would like to tone down in victimhood culture, not feel discriminated for not being an imagined victim. The women who claim to be professional victims all day long are just violent nasty people. I do not want to be like them. it would be best MGTOW and stay away from the crazy people. then there is no need to feel left out in social justi…
/r/MensRights17/07/21 08:26 PM
2

I met people who lived in sexless marriage and just had their fun outside, while keeping up the family, because children and property. This may be possible. The idea that sex is restricted to the relationship collides with this situation. In traditional times, divorce was not an option, and people had to find ways. That's why extramarital "affairs" were always frequent. We could be more relaxed about that.
/r/MGTOW215/07/21 11:13 AM
1

It seems that you misunderstood my contribution. Because that's what I commented.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:28 AM
7

careful, this is a trick. EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY has been achieved, because we all agreed upon that. Every human being can try to do anything they want. EQUALITY OF OUTCOME is an INJUSTICE, and INEQUALITY, to give certain people a PRIVILEGE in order to achieve something beyond equality. THIS is "feminism", and "social justice" in general.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 11:00 PM
1

I am being effectively discriminated because of female privileges since 30 years solid.
/r/MensRights13/07/21 10:36 PM
5

Yes, the Swedish law is yet another point in the feminist agenda to discriminate men. They are a bit more "progressive than other European countries which also experience the decline of sex services due to the influence of feminists and the ecological totalitarians, such as no longer allowing prostitution in the streets. The prostitutes themselves protested such laws which are greatly harming their business and their safety, but the ecolos said they don't know what is good for them ... which is …
/r/MensRights12/07/21 06:24 PM
1

it seems that "conservatives" are actually fair people. they want order, i.e., fairness. it seems "buddhists" keep their ethics sacred, never allowing themselves to lie, steal and betray, or disadvantage anybody. instead, they will help everybody to achieve what they want to achieve. on a sidenote, it took me years to understand that the truly good people in my life never were leftists, but always "conservatives"; they helped me, they taught me, they had reasonable opinions. they do not believe …
/r/MGTOW220/06/21 02:56 PM
3

addition: equality of outcome requires the suspension of equality (of opportunity). It is a method to undermine equality and get a favor. A favor most women do not seem to want, given their own professional choices.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 01:27 PM
6

personality disorders do exist, and beside all the modern virtue-signalling and praising of LGBT (which is ideologically motivated, not really caring for people), it is our goal to be tolerant, liberal, and nice to people -- contrary to the SJWs.
/r/MGTOW217/06/21 07:17 PM
5

If they don't suspend equality of opportunity, they won't get equality of outcome. The ideologists try to tell us that equality and fairness are bad. We are told to promote certain groups of people instead. Of course, it would not withstand a reality check.
/r/MGTOW206/06/21 10:45 AM
5

Yes, unfortunately, this crap is coming to everyone. That is the price of giving up traditional ways and talk women into becoming workslaves. Of course, they won't have children and care for a home.
/r/MGTOW206/06/21 10:41 AM
1

This is a silly comment; my first comment was pointing out the hypocrisy of the people with YOUR worldview, and my second comment was not ironic. However, if you want EQUALITY OF OUTCOME, as you do, then first of all you send the women into the sewage system, and into the steel factories, and into mining.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 01:17 AM
1

One could also leave people in peace and not try to "encourage" them to do what an ideology wants to be the case. Maybe a majority of human beings would prefer to follow their natural instincts and just do what their biology wants them to do; e.g., having children, having a family, or playing with objects and succeeding with some project. Your proposal also wants to screw something in the opposite direction. Why? Equality of opportunity does exist, and that would be the ideal state: Everybody ca…
/r/MensRights20/05/21 07:33 PM
9

Equality: encouraging girls to become sewer workers. Does not happen.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:45 AM
3

Because of anti-male laws, it is impossible to take the risk, actually. This "diamond" is not a diamond, it is a person who has full power over you. Why would you deliver yourself to somebody else? Even if this person happens to be decent -- you cannot truly know that. This society has created a situation which actually creates a risk one cannot reasonably accept.
/r/MGTOW215/05/21 09:03 AM
2

Beings in general are deluded by their wrong views, wrong assumptions, their ignorance about the true nature of reality (in the buddhist sense). Therefore, they often act in ways to get what they want in an unwise way, by harming others. This has at times characteristics of a group with similar circumstances of life, all doing similar things. Therefore, many women behave in a predictable, nasty way, and since they have the law on their side, men experience a situation of discrimination -- or str…
/r/MGTOW207/05/21 09:11 AM
0

It's cute to see how much that triggers the feminists.
/r/MGTOW227/04/21 07:08 PM
4

I do not think like feminists -- so I do not think that "seeing" such situations changes the children's understanding of the world. I think the feminist ideology transported by teachers is changing the unterstanding. When I was young, in primary school, almost all teachers were women and the janitors were a couple. This was not an interesting fact at that time. We did not discuss equity ...
/r/MensRights02/04/21 06:08 PM
1

In 10 years, a majority of the workforce will retire. We have no plan, it seems, how to solve this huge problem: a) Who is going to pay for that? b) Who is going to replace 75% of all nurses etc. in a very short time? -- The dating problems with "empowered" women are not even our biggest problem. We should have had a lot of children more than 10 years ago :-)
/r/MGTOW226/03/21 02:11 AM
7

It is threatening. If I were an optimist, I would say, let's boycott women until laws are changed, viewpoints are reversed, the old order is restored. This won't happen. We have to commit societal suicide by not reproducing with these people. The demographic desaster is due in 10 years anyway.
/r/MGTOW225/03/21 12:43 PM
–

shortly before complete idiocy, human beings were only able to state short phrases with a maximum of 5 words. nobody was able to argue or reason any longer, everything was reduced to short beliefs, usually blaming some strawman of not believing the same.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 11:50 PM
2

When entering totalitarian times with ideologically deluded people, even families will be unpleasant, if not dangerous. People do not realise how they are going down this road, in their self-righteousness. One should not talk too much (at the wrong place), if people are not willing to understand something beside their own beliefs.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 12:39 AM
2

Vast generalisations are not very helpful. One should never ever rely on the opinion of the public, or wish to be appreciated by it. Most complaints, in general, refer to this idea that one needs to be officially declared victim and needs empathy. One does not. It would be as embarrassing as seeing all this woman-cherishing in society. Such cherishing compromises the character. A man should know he won't get help from outside. Then look out for the remaining options. One should not demand "socie…
/r/MensRights20/03/21 09:19 PM
2

the effects of feminism and "leftist" delusion.
/r/MGTOW217/03/21 09:24 PM
5

I am doubtful you can ever stop everybody from dating, however, it goes in that direction naturally. As far as I can observe, a young guy today is practically not able to find a young woman ready for marriage and children; even if that were available, there would still be the risk of divorce and childcare. In short, it is vain and/or too risky to date. Young women are not ready for a real life. Given the facts, this society will decrease and therefore will get replaced by people who don't think …
/r/MGTOW213/03/21 08:15 PM
6

Are you asking the narcissistic self-interest people to think in fair and altruistic ways? :-) Just tell your boys to go MGTOW, at least with "western women". This is an incurable situation. Found a male-only club, stay away from the ladies. The problem may come from the fact that a society actually does need strict rules separating the two sexes; "free love" does not work with most people. Let's draw the consequences: Fucking around is no more.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 04:58 PM
4

All these anti-oppression movements, when victorious, become oppression movements. anti-racists are racists and anti-sexists are sexists.
/r/MGTOW208/03/21 05:10 PM
1

For me, MGTOW is the answer or reaction to feminism. It is good advice to men not to marry especially western women under the given circumstances where one can get destroyed by women in divorce, and where women are narcissistic and taught not to care for the happiness of their husband. One may, however, still take the risk under certain circumstances -- when one is sufficiently certain that this woman is not a feminist, but a woman. One can of course be wrong and get screwed :-D For me, having c…
/r/MGTOW204/03/21 08:07 PM
2

You are speaking from a narrow perspective. I was speaking about human society in general. I said that "marriage" is a normative measure of societies to organise various aspects of life: children, ownership, heritage, etc.. Traditionally human society is organised in clans and families; there are shared hierarchies, duties and responsibilities everywhere which sounds "unfree" to a western mind of today. All this is lost in the western society which alone leads to viewpoints as we can see today, …
/r/TheRedPill04/03/21 02:53 PM
1

Buddhist wisdom: All beings try not to suffer, but have pleasure, and all they ever get is suffering. Marriage is not "good for you", it is "good for society" (social order), and therefore, it is also good for you, because your overall happiness depends on society. It is especially good for children who need a safe place to grow up. At all times in history, people have married and had children -- and secretly fucked around in their spare time ... One should be more realistic in one's "morals": N…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/21 12:47 PM
1

This reminds me of when I was a child and I was chasing a rat, reached it, and killed it by stepping on it. Afterwards, I felt bad, and I thought about why I did it -- because I did not know why. -- I figured I did not even expect to succeed and there was nothing else to do, when I had cornered the animal. I was on auto-pilot, the natural instinct of a hunter perhaps. I did not become a vet, but I also did not forget this rat, and I still regret having made it suffer.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 05:29 PM
2

The real red pill for the multitude of guys is that their usual approach is just meaningless or will give them only the silly ladies, in direct dependence on your own attractiveness by handsomeness and wealth. I find it tiring to read comments of men on online platforms usually just saying "you are beautiful". If you want to meet a cool woman, first thing to do is tease her about something. Simple example: If she says she has fear of flying, touch that fear and propose a holiday far away -- by a…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/20 08:33 PM
1

This observation exhibits a flaw in feminist thinking: they stand no chance against men in violence (!), therefore, they want them to not be violent so that they can be.
/r/MensRights26/09/20 01:47 PM
1

yes. i was even unaware this happens in germany.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:37 PM
3

take a taxi.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:42 AM
155

the "empowerment of women" destroyed western society. all this single-motherhood is heartbreaking for the men and highly destructive for the children.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 06:37 PM
1

if one gets negative reactions, one must think how oneself can improve the game. that is helpful. it shows one that there are mistakes. that's where i intended to help. nobody be needy. you must spread the feeling that you don't need that woman, but if she is nice, she is allowed into your world. i hate to say things which are merely theoretical, because that does not help. i tried a more concrete path to say that. everything is about how you actually appear to others.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:31 AM
-1

there is no reason to jump into my face. my advice to everybody is to be alpha. creepy is not alpha. and in case you are insulted -- like you insulted me -- then i don't contemplate being your victim ("it's fucking cruel"), i simply walk away. which is another pretty good advice. i just have to answer here for other readers.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 01:03 AM
1

life advice: just don't be creepy. creepy is not alpha. women who are not nice to you and do not appreciate your approach -- leave them alone. you can only take control by not wasting time on the wrong women. since i don't give a shit about the women, they usually don't reject me. actually, they like it that way. it must feel like difficult for them to get you. and don't marry them -- that changes the game.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 11:56 AM
1

you are like a spirit waiting in ambush to annoy a poster on some detail of his text. i wrote something completely different. what you try to fixate us on now i read some time ago when researching the topic. at this moment, i am not in my library, but abroad; i am no longer doing that; this is not a scientific paper, this is reddit. you can read what i said even on wikipedia. so stop annoying me.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/18 10:27 PM
0

lmgtfy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_Reports that was really not my point. i simply mentioned what is factual. if you don't believe, go to the library and get the book. one can usually get books also online, if one knows where to look for it.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/18 11:07 PM
2

i am surprised why this fact attracts so much attention. it is not that surprising that boys and yound men and maybe elder men like to play with their willy and maybe other willies in various ways. what this tells us is more important: there is a scale between playing with willies and being a very rare occurrence of a man wishing to "marry" a man and sit with him in their common livingroom (usually surrounded by an art collection). it is not justified to make this extremely rare specialty of peo…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/18 01:37 PM
-1

it is long ago that i read this stuff. they were asking many people. whatever, i do not mind. on a personal note, if you dig a bit, you would be surprised what is happening below the surface ...
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 08:29 PM
-3

a scientific report obeys certain quality standards. kinsey was a scientific report. i did not read such critique in sexology. however, i do not want to go back to that nowadays. it is not my main interest.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 08:20 PM
-3

i am sorry, i investigated that many years ago. i don't have this at hand.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 08:19 PM
-9

i never say anything that is not true. this is well-established since the "kinsey-report".
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 07:56 PM
-1

kinsey report 70s.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 07:48 PM
15

it was ok in the 80s and 90s to send the message that there is really no justification to harm gays or TG people. but it was overlooked how stupid people are ... more than half of the men have at least one homosexual experience in life. fewer do so regularly, while being usually married. very few do that quite frequently, maybe even predominantly. extremely few want to marry another man and play family. now the tiniest group of a deviant behavior which humanists just wanted to free from injustic…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/18 04:13 PM
1

you would not believe how humanities look from inside. they are using censorship against ideas which go against their narrative and still believe to be the peak of liberty and democracy. these idiots lack the ability of insight. and here, the lower classes, under the name of SJW, are trying to win the culture war they have lost long time ago. but they are still in power. they need to be removed from all their posts, from the government across the media until all the little blockwarts* in social …
/r/TheRedPill04/11/18 06:24 PM
3

the revolution always eats its own children.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/18 12:24 AM
3

the hypocrites can see that they are loosing ground for just being plain wrong with everything, thus they go stalinism in order to keep their power. these "moral" people are not moral, they are deeply unethical; they think reason, logic, an argument are only used to get power. they do not care about human civilization and humanist values and achievements. the regressive left has lost all moral position, the people of the regressive left have to be redpilled or politically defeated, for they are …
/r/TheRedPill05/10/18 08:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter