TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thycuprunnethover Archive

View 0 posts and 124 comments by thycuprunnethover on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Sorry, but if you prance around with your boobs dancing about, half-exposed, people will look. That’s like telling people not to look at a man who walks around with his testicles sticking out.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 03:53 PM
1

And your womb means nothing without the required ejaculate. You say there’s enough sperm in the banks. Where does that sperm come from, Harry Potter’s wand? No men = no babies. Let’s not pretend women can magically have a baby by thinking about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 05:21 PM
1

The sweeping generalizations make it quite difficult for me to engage with your argument seriously. All I will say is that this is why a lot of men have opted out of relationships entirely. A lot of women make it clear in no uncertain terms that they deeply, deeply dislike men. That is perfectly fine and their prerogative, so long as they don't later act in a logically non-conforming way by somehow wanting to date one and acting all befuddled when men (who, contrary to popular belief, aren't idi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 04:52 PM
1

Hm yes, rich deep thoughts about how Becky from marketing was mean yesterday.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 04:49 PM
1

The woman wouldn't have birthed them hadn't a man ejaculated in her. The end.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 04:43 PM
1

Right, but if they cannot get Chad, then it follows we should have no sympathy if they then go on TikTok and whine, saying, “why don’t men want me and my 3 kids from 3 different fathers?” They can play the game but don’t get to play victim thereafter.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 05:10 PM
1

They settle but won’t admit it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:57 PM
1

Sure!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:54 PM
1

Oh, come on. You think people who share those stories on Reddit are influencers or are just AI bots? Laughable
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:47 PM
1

I do think they are real. I was alluding to the fact that whenever a point is made that someone disagrees with, and one shares people’s experiences online to bolster their point, the counter always seems to be that those people somehow aren’t everyday people. So, in jest, I said they must be fake because you don’t agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:44 PM
1

Usual answer, the people on social media aren’t people in real life. They’re all AI-generated!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:10 PM
1

Social media will give you the answer. Verifiably true, no assumptions required.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 04:08 PM
2

Because their standards change coincidentally when they can’t get those 7 foot tall Chads to commit and they are desperate to get married and have kids. Seems opportunistic more than genuine.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:59 PM
2

What you said rings true only if quality means looks. To me quality means who you are as a person beyond only your looks. You said good = quality. So, if quality = attractive, then your definition of a good person is Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:46 PM
2

Ok, so you confessed that the only quality that matters is whether you are attractive. Accordingly, an ugly woman is not a good person!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:42 PM
3

So you’re saying whether someone is a good man depends on how good looking they are? This logic is astounding and only proves the red pill talking points.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:36 PM
3

I’m fine with it, but then do not say women are the fairer sex. This also proves the whole where did all the good men go is self-inflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:32 PM
–

That’s not what you said previously. Is it or is it not?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:30 PM
–

Right, but you said it’s the most important thing, didn’t you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:28 PM
–

And yet women say they aren’t the shallow sex, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:26 PM
–

The usual men bad!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/25 02:17 PM
2

Simply because, unless someone is religious or wants to have kids, there's nothing that one can get from a marriage that they can't otherwise get from being in a relationship. Additionally, marriage is simply a risky proposition for a man, especially if they are the higher income earner. Even if I were to indulge and say that it isn't risky, the reasons people provide as to why one should get married aren't all that compelling and don't stand up to scrutiny. For example, people oftentimes mentio…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 03:13 PM
1

As to point number 1, women love to say good guys are hard to find, when in reality what they mean is good guys who are also Chads are hard to find. Let’s keep it real: good guys weren’t all sent to Mars. They are just overlooked until they become useful idiots (presuming he did the work to become desirable rather than living as a victim) when the woman in question is in her 30s and the guys she really wants are either off the market or are only interested in having sex with her. Magically, that…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:24 PM
4

indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:13 PM
1

Spot on
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:50 PM
–

I think in general men and women have a very hard time understanding each other when it comes to dating, i.e., women will never know what it’s like to date as a man and vice versa. Might be biased here, but I hardly blame men for not feeling sorry for someone with too many options when they barely have any. It’s like a homeless person trying to empathize with someone who says “more money, more problems.” They’d probably think, “Oh, give me a break. I have no money.” With respect to dating apps, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:16 PM
-4

Not really privileged. Women are the gatekeepers of sex and men the gatekeepers of commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/25 08:11 PM
1

Yeah, ok. No sperm, no baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 09:29 PM
1

No. I'm a single guy and presently spend no time with members of the opposite sex. There's no reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:32 PM
1

You see, the issue is that by sleeping with the good-looking guys and bearing the consequences (possibly children) they oftentimes expect the 'nice man' to swoop in later and fix the mess for her. At least they had great sex, but now little Tyrone needs nappies and needs to be taken to the pediatrician. Will you, average Nick, now clean up big daddy Tyrone's mess? I don't think so. Look, everyone has to own up to their mistakes in life. They can sleep around with whomever they want, but they als…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:29 PM
1

well, i suspect you'll find that peacocks and humans are somewhat different. Just because something happens in the animal kingdom, doesn't mean that it hasn't evolved differently in humans. While some men like the thrill of the chase, others are downright tired of it and are bowing out. The fact is, that needing to impress the female basically creates an uneven playing field, in which the woman feels like she doesn't have to prove anything. Simply having a pair of tits means the world owes her e…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 08:21 PM
1

ahaha i'm sure you do!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 01:15 AM
1

ok, but then they shouldn't complain about struggling to find partners. They can just buy cats or dogs.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 12:33 AM
1

then by that definition, everyone on here, including you, is apparently an incel!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 12:25 AM
1

No, an average woman has about 3000 standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:42 PM
1

Ha, you say I'm an incel without even knowing me. So pathetic, see ya later
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:42 PM
1

Again, porn is just one standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:35 PM
1

In other words, 'I make statements which I can't back up'. Gotcha!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:34 PM
1

Really? Got evidence for me?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:33 PM
1

Then applying that standard is reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:32 PM
1

Therefore, using yourself as an example is irrelevant. You're not a man, nor have you spoken to all men, so you don't know whether or not most men have standards or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:24 PM
1

People largely view the predominant use of Tinder as being hooking up. Therefore, if most people use it with that mindset, it makes it more likely that they will use other apps for dating. Even though it could be statistically disproven, the fact it has acquired that reputation over the years taints the perception of the average person using it in terms of what they are looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:23 PM
1

Oh ok and do you watch porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:22 PM
1

Is that so? Are you a man or a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:17 PM
1

Because if it's mostly used for hooking up, then by logic, it means people mostly use other apps for actually dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:16 PM
2

I suspect you're speculating
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:15 PM
14

Much better to be alone than in bad company. I loathe the idea that a man has to prove anything, as if we were talking about some sort of deity who expels gold when they defecate. Just talking about women. I understand it's part of courting, but it's frankly pathetic--like ravenous dogs, who also happen to be in heat. No sense to a song and dance in which the woman spectates and the man makes a complete and utter fool of himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 11:14 PM
1

This isn't true and is a commonly peddled piece of misinformation. While it is true that some men will sleep with anyone or date just about anyone, the rest do have standards. The only difference is that men are more realistic about who they can get and can adjust accordingly, whereas when the same thing starts happening for some women, they either a) believe the guy is just stupid for not wanting them; b) 'just not my time yet, they'll magically show up one day'. Or, they end up alone in their …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:51 PM
1

No. It's just that people more often use apps like Bumble, POF, OkCupid to get into a relationship. For a long time, Tinder has had the reputation of being a hookup app, and people aren't shy about sharing that either.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:49 PM
1

ok. And this statement is based on people you've never met?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 10:48 PM
1

Yeah, but a few bucks less is way different than a substantial income disparity.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:08 PM
2

This isn't hard to understand. If someone wants to stay at home, they won't marry someone that's destitute, ergo, they're partly looking for someone with money. Therefore, they're marrying up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:07 PM
2

Hint: stay at home women aren't bringing in income.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:03 PM
2

Well, it kind of is, if you refuse to date a man or marry him because he earns less.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:03 PM
2

If they aren't outnumbered by the amount marrying down, it means the amount is either the same, or more women are marrying up than are marrying down. Very simple indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:02 PM
2

No, the goalposts are precisely where they should be. If most women are marrying up, it follows that they are also considering a man for his resources. How many women would marry a guy in poverty, living on the streets? Exactly.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:00 PM
3

Ok-follow up question. Is the number of women marrying down outnumbered by the number of women marrying up?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:58 PM
3

Ok--how often do women marry down?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:57 PM
2

Of course you would have an equal or slightly better financial/material life than you did on your own, since finances are combined when you get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:55 PM
1

uh-huh, that much I figured out by myself :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:19 PM
1

I suspect you aren't understanding what I mean. The fact you don't ask yourself what you offer in a relationship is why a lot of modern relationships fail. One side takes and the other doesn't really receive. I'm not saying one should ask themselves what they bring to the table if they're dating, but if they want to enter into a relationship, I believe they should. It takes two to tango. This goes for both men and women, not only blaming women for this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:10 PM
2

This is, in fact, true.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:07 PM
2

I get what you mean. I'm not talking about being physically attracted, because we can't help that. One doesn't make 'demands' with regard to who they are attracted to--you often know very, very quickly. What I am talking about is a 'checklist' for their personality traits, for what the ideal partner should do. With respect, if someone demands all sorts of things from a partner, but isn't prepared to give them back, they should re-evaluate their standards if they find themselves perpetually alone…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:04 PM
1

I'd argue that it's mainly used for hooking up, and perhaps a smaller part uses it to date. To me, using Tinder to find someone to actually be in a relationship with is the equivalent of cutting a steak using your fingernails.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:42 PM
4

See, but the issue is: how reasonable are these requirements? Are they prepared to offer what they demand? If someone has requirements based on a Hollywood-fantasy, I suspect the real world will provide a rude awakening. I'm not saying people aren't entitled to requirements, but they aren't also entitled to throw a pity party and proclaim that no one wants them or they all suck. In some cases, what you said might be true. In others, I don't believe it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:25 PM
3

So the top 20% thereby determine the girls' standards for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 07:15 PM
10

But you see, the key distinction you fail to make is that a woman may have many good options, but a 3-foot long checklist. Therefore, they end up rejecting everybody because the man doesn't cross everything off and they don't want to settle, then complain when there's no options. It's a 'different kind' of hard because, a lot of the time, they make it so. Sometimes, sure, the options are trashy. But to say that every single option they come across is trashy smells fishy to me. Also, if they go o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:48 PM
3

indeed
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:24 PM
5

While I agree with what you are saying, the problem is that if you date someone in part for the money, it means that your attraction to them is partly contingent on how much money they have. No one wants to be loved for their wallet, to be quite honest, even if it's only one reason. It's incredibly shallow. It's one thing if, for example, you want to start a family and you financially vet people. But it's quite another to vet them based on how much money they have, because you like guys who make…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:12 PM
1

First of all, not having a dating life doesn't make you a loser. In today's day and age, it is oftentimes better to remain single. You simply need to live your life and learn to depend on yourself only for happiness and fulfillment. We have bought into the Disney fairytales. The fact is, most people can't be trusted, and if you're not in a good place mentally, even bothering to date is a very bad idea. Most relationships end in a break up and you'll be back to square one.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 06:09 PM
1

I don't care
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 09:23 PM
1

alright, girl. Likewise!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:41 PM
1

Woman's criteria: Must be 6'10 Must have abs Must have nice teeth Must not be fat (careful, if a man uses that criteria, it's fatphobic!)
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:37 PM
1

No, because you simply can't back up the claim that one needs to be intelligent, as opposed to intelligence being beneficial. If you can't make this real tough connection, then I can't help you, I'm afraid
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:55 PM
1

nah, you're conveniently ignoring the point i'm making, which rests in the necessity of applying the definition, and not the definition itself. You're just mad I'm not backing down and agreeing with your ludicrous arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:47 PM
2

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:46 PM
1

Of course, because they want to be professionals. Practicing is required to be professional. This is a non-sequitur and I guess all this is much ado about nothing. I have my point of view, you have yours. That's all
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:40 PM
2

Well, because it is. Say it ain't so!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:36 PM
1

I was both an amateur musician (piano, drums, guitar, and some violin) and an amateur athlete (tennis, soccer, swimming). Actually, manipulating my nether regions to bukkake is precisely what I do when working on my 'deep dick' game. Deep into my hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:35 PM
2

The subject of pleasing men? I'm a vegan, I'm afraid. Charcuterie isn't for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:30 PM
1

sure
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:29 PM
1

Practicing means you're intelligent? Holy mackerel
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:28 PM
3

Sorry, facts are annoying when you live in your echo chamber.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:25 PM
1

on the contrary, it makes me someone endowed with a huge asshole. Nice try, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:24 PM
1

Yes, they tell you it's about practice, consistency, and focus. You make my point for me
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:22 PM
1

Really? You're saying sex is easy to be good at, followed by all the ways in which you must please the woman, with nothing about how the woman must please the man. Another example of how it's all about the woman!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:18 PM
2

See, the only reason why you're saying it isn't true is because you disagree with it. Disagreeing with something doesn't make it not true, it just means you disagree. Hmm, women are trying to tell us that they believe they're all that, when they have no idea how to please a man. When trying to give a BJ, they're the equivalent of a ravenous dog munching on a popsicle.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:16 PM
2

nah, you never said you need good form for anything. You told me it requires intelligence to lift weights, which is the most laughable thing I have heard all day. Form is achieved through practice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:14 PM
1

Once again, I am not denying the definition of intelligence. I am merely stating that it's not necessary to be intelligent to be good at sex. Correlation does not equal causation. So far, I have yet to see one good argument that proves it's required, as opposed to being beneficial, that doesn't do any of the following: a) state that I must be an incel; b) repeat the same things while ignoring the point I just made, or c) whine and gaslight
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:10 PM
2

Yeah, you're ignoring my point. I'm not denying its definition. I won't bother with your persistent ad hominem attacks, nor to further engage with you, so pathetic. Stay mad
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 06:02 PM
3

stay mad
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:52 PM
2

So if I have the ability to push out ungodly large shits, does that make me an intelligent defecator?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:51 PM
3

Sure, it's a form of emotional intelligence, but I will argue until the end of time that someone can be good at sex without necessarily being conventionally intelligent. I think you're interpreting my definition of intelligence as being academic intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:50 PM
3

Likewise, many women seem to think that laying down and spreading their legs and laying there like some sort of a demented eagle is all that's required.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:42 PM
5

Except for the fact that none of you can provide reasons why intelligence is required, as opposed to it being sufficient. All you're doing is saying wahh, wahh, you don't believe me unless I provide proof, how dare you! Let me brand you all as being incels :(
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:38 PM
5

Sure thing, lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:35 PM
3

I know, but while I think it may be sufficient to be good at sex, it's not necessary. Meaning, a person can be able to learn what is good, what isn't, and apply it, but it doesn't mean they are necessarily intelligent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:18 PM
4

Then what's to stop them from going their separate ways? If they aren't attracted to each other, there's no reason for them to be anything other than, perhaps, friends. What I suspect I am hearing is that unless someone looks like John Stamos, an average girl simply won't put in the work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:05 PM
1

an elongated schlong
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 05:02 PM
3

My point flew right over your head. Being intelligent isn't a necessary condition to be good at sex. It's a sufficient condition to learn how to be good at sex and perhaps being good at it, though I think the arguments one can make for this are very specious. The fact it isn't necessary means a person can be stupid but really good at sex. If I'm intelligent, then I can learn to be good at sex/can be good at it. This is what I am claiming. The sufficient condition is removed and the rule falls aw…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:53 PM
5

While this may be true, being intelligent isn't a requirement to have sex, just like being intelligent isn't a requirement to learn how to cook. It may be a sufficient condition to be good at sex, but not necessary. If an unintelligent person learns how to cook, it doesn't necessarily follow from this that they are intelligent. It means they have practical abilities.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:48 PM
2

Ability, not intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:42 PM
3

Of course! Now, please provide evidence that shows me that it takes intelligence to lift weights, rather than it being simply physical exertion. Likewise, show me it requires intelligence to defecate. I mean, I find it laughable at best that girls pontificate about what it takes to be good at sex, when they merely spread their legs and take it. Nobody is mad, just stating facts. But, as usual, with women, when you state facts, they get angry at the truth and gaslight or deflect. As you are doing…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:33 PM
4

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:30 PM
6

Not necessarily the same way, but they do have to do the work. The problem is, for the longest time, girls have failed to admit to themselves that their only standard is to exist, because they believe they are the table. If that is their definition, choking the chicken is much better than 'dating' any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:27 PM
10

Because saying that it takes any kind of intelligence to be good at sex is the equivalent of saying it takes a certain kind of intelligence to work out. It makes no sense and has no basis in fact
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:25 PM
3

No what? They are indeed entitled to it and don't have to do any work?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:21 PM
4

Yeah, but nobody is entitled to anything. Your fridge analogy presumes a woman is entitled to always having everything prepared, and never needing to put in the work. A woman has to earn her relationship, just like a man. It doesn't just fall in their lap
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:14 PM
13

You provided the perfect reasoning for why men should stay away from women. Please elucidate, how does one have to be intelligent to be good at sex? Is there an IQ test required? Most girls merely lay there and take it, so by this definition, they must be braindead. The desperation you are seeing is coming from someone who probably can't get anyone unless they 'fake' being someone they aren't. The fact you said it 'has to be fake' means that a person is better off staying single. Most girls, acc…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:08 PM
2

what's so trashy about it? would you wait for a year before having sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 02:51 PM
1

male attention is worthless and of no value So if their attention is worth nothing to you, why should any man care about you?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:35 AM
11

The statement above presumes the man always has to do everything, so they can be a real man. You make my point for me. Why would anyone want to date someone who can't communicate their interest, unless the man coaxes it out of them or reads their mind? This is what is generally required with women, they make nothing known. You have to somehow magically know, or read her mind-numbingly stupid signals, as if you were children in middle school. Just communicate, like adults. Dating games are honest…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:22 AM
1

Answer: i couldn't give a toss about either
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:48 PM
1

all about what you women want, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:39 PM
1

FDS can say whatever it is what they wish, but they are mistakenly assuming that every man wishes to propagate their genes into the next generation. Some of us don't want to propagate anything. The emperor really has no clothes in FDS headquarters. They define a successful woman as being one who pops out babies and who earns some fool's commitment to protect and benefit her and their offspring. Notice how they said zilch, god forbid, about the woman making any kind of commitment to the man or th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:24 PM
1

fair enough. To each their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:11 PM
-1

You've made it while in a relationship with someone, or you made it all by yourself? Because choosing not to have sex for 4 years is vastly different from surviving a relationship in which there is no sex for 4 years. Either that relationship ends, or one or both people in the relationship seek satisfaction elsewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 11:04 PM
5

I wouldn't necessarily say a bullet, because that implies it's harmful to be with someone who wants to have sex. Wanting to have sex and being genuinely interested in someone aren't mutually exclusive things. Of course, I can understand someone saying, for example, 'I don't wanna put out on the first date'. This is fair. The fact is, barring asexual people, sex is part and parcel of any relationship, and an important part at that. Now, 6 months may not be so bad to some. But, let's say you start…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:59 PM
2

yeah, this'll be a problem. If you make a man wait 6 months to have sex, he'll probably go looking somewhere else. Hate to say it, but such is life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:44 PM
7

nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:43 PM
1

the ones who are very desperate do, indeed, go for the so-called 'low-hanging fruit'. The other reason why some might avoid the hot ones is because the hot ones know as much about courtship as a blind man knows about watching a baseball game. They haven't the foggiest. Though this could be applied to your average woman. Now, what is the function of a rubber duck?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 10:36 PM
9

That dating is a waste of time, in which men engage in a whole song and dance, a sort of pathetic "ooh, pick me, pick me" choreograph, for jack diddly squat. In the meantime, they don't know how many guys they are competing against, and for that guy, you may be the only option, whereas for the girl, you might be one of the 100 other options she has. If you slip up during the dance, on to Johnny boy, with the six pack! Oh wait, but first, let me whip out my 1,500 page checklist to really, really …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:46 PM
1

i desire romantic relationships about as much as I desire a sack full of rocks swung with determination at my testicles. Once you see how much is possible as a single man, it's very hard to turn back.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:38 PM
2

no. A woman frequently loves a man for what they believe he can become and what they can provide. Not for who the man fundamentally is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter