ticktocking Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
4	Tale as old as time Bruh, I clicked through and thought those comments were here. Was about to unsub.	/r/MensRights	15/12/21 09:44 PM
7	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! That's what it's like a lot of the time. I had an older lady grope me at a bar, and I remember immediately feeling a lot of pressure in how I handled it. I was not interested but felt I could not just say that because I could hurt her feelings and who knows how she'd react. I couldn't just push her away cause I might accidentally hurt her and hurting a woman(even an overly aggressive molester) is the fastest way to get your ass beat by 5 dudes. So I just made excuses about how she was too drunk,…	/r/MensRights	29/07/21 08:11 PM
4	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! Same as when you see a man do it to a woman. Either confront the person doing it, or if uncomfortable find someone with authority (bouncer, sdcurity, cop if you have to, etc)	/r/MensRights	29/07/21 07:12 PM
124	Erections are not a gauge of intrest, being erect does not mean consent! Erections can occur at literally any time, and for many many reason. Such as just woke up, taking a warm shower, our blood just decided to go there, exercising, excited, scared etc. It occurs completely outside our control, and doesnt indicate any kind of sexual arousal. Even if it is due to arousal that is not an indication of consent.	/r/MensRights	29/07/21 07:07 PM
11	More examples of feminsits altering basics tenants of law and human rights For sure. This is a special kind of hateful. My intention (lol) was to say that even if the intentions were good the arguement stands. Stripping rights is always bad.	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 05:40 PM
32	More examples of feminsits altering basics tenants of law and human rights If the proposed bill is ratified this is will be a huge step towards facism in NZ. I honestly can't believe someone would open this door. The presumption of innocence is one of the few protections any accused person has. The right to silence is a basic tenet of justice. The exclusion of any evidence is willful ignorance. For fellow Americans, this is equivalent to removing the 5th ammendment. Stripping rights from citizens, no matter the intentions, should never be accepted by the citizens. Ya'l…	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 04:31 PM
20	More examples of feminsits altering basics tenants of law and human rights Being forced to give a statement during an arrest is a terrible idea for several reasons. The accused may not be a good speaker, and being arrested is a stressful experience. It would be very easy for an experienced police officer to lead the accused to saying something damning even if they did nothing wrong. This is why we have a lawyers. They talk for us. All accused are given a presumption of innocence. It is the job of the accuser to provide legitimate testimony, and the job of the police to…	/r/MensRights	27/06/21 04:09 PM
18	Yes Toxic masculinity Some are yeah, and that's basically what I'm getting at. There is no need for that term. It sounds inflammatory, degrading, and shaming. Some use it almost as a slur (not those who know the definition of course). The biggest part for me is that there is no reason to not use more easily understood terminology like "gender roles", "harmful stereotypes", or "societal expectations". It leads to these dumb derailing arguements over a definition instead of any kind of productive conversation. It's a f…	/r/MensRights	11/06/21 09:07 PM
25	Yes Toxic masculinity Look at that shitshow of a comment section. Maybe they should make a better term to use. Using feminist studies jargon to explain societal standards in real life is fucking dumb. Didn't you guys learn to write to your audience in like 5th grade? Just say social standards. Or gender roles. How many of these conversations need to break down over the use of this stupid useless terminology before people get the hint and change the language? "Hmm people really don't like this term that requires hours…	/r/MensRights	11/06/21 07:14 PM
4	Gents, we do not have to be surrogate dads for coddled women 👋 The same arguement from a man's perspective would be "Guys, I've found women /in particular/ are spoiled. You don't have to act as their dad, and coddled them." She is calling out men, once again, IN PARTICULAR. As in more than women, as in they are coddled because they were born male. This is sexism. I don't care that she went on to just complain about her relationship. The title, and the intro are sexist. I agree that the majority is just a complaint about the relationship.	/r/MensRights	10/06/21 05:30 PM
5	Gents, we do not have to be surrogate dads for coddled women 👋 Yeah, but the title and the post both imply "I dated a guy with flaws and I think those flaws are because he's a man". This isn't a super egregious example but it is some casual sexism. "I think men in particular (implying more than women) are coddled by their moms in particular (implying more coddling than dads)..." This part shouldn't have been included. Especially cause that statement doesnt even fit her situation. The man lived with his grandmother. If anything that was included to try to wi…	/r/MensRights	10/06/21 04:46 PM
30	Gents, we do not have to be surrogate dads for coddled women 👋 Yeh, the issue I take with that post is the "men in particular". Shes taking her poor judgement of character as justification for saying men are coddled in general. Not surprising as she clearly has poor judgement.	/r/MensRights	10/06/21 03:56 PM
6	“Safe Spaces” Why do people think MRA's and feminism are opposing philosophies? They are just small parts of true egalitarianism. If we're being honest with our goals (equal treatment equal rights) then we should be working together. Men's rights doesnt take from feminism or vice versa.	/r/MensRights	04/06/21 08:12 PM
10	This sounds like father alienation and ignoring a simple request Sounded to me like he simply wanted to be present for a major life event in his sons life.	/r/MensRights	13/12/20 05:18 PM
14	"men only bring up men's issues to undermine women's issues, you don't actually care about men" I'm thinking it's the 'in general' and 'male' parts that are irksome. If you said "being a well off white person' we would be in complete agreement. I still agree with most of what you're saying. But man, as a guy who dug himself out of a poor white trash meth town on my own back while watching women in similar situations get scholarships I couldn't even apply for... well its irksome.	/r/MensRights	26/10/20 11:44 PM
4	"Male privilege is foreskin advocacy groups. The fact that you think your circumcision is somehow on par with female genital mutilation is so gross." Then your experience is irrelevant, this is about newborn baby boys, and a procedure that's generally done without anesthetic. Of course you didn't have the same experience as a child? If you pinch me hard I'll be a little irritated. If you pinched a newborn baby the same way it'd hurt like hell, and scare the shit out of the baby. Cutting off a piece of them when they can't even understand what's happening is a few orders of magnitude above that don't ya think?	/r/MensRights	29/08/18 10:39 PM