TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

timbstoke Archive

View 2 posts and 35 comments by timbstoke on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

As a chid of divorce, I read these stories and am grateful for my parents. Although they hated each other at the time of divorce, they asked me who I wanted to stay with, and both agreed the situation as far as visitation long before it got to court. For the record, I chose to live with my father. I then stayed with my mother every weekend.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 10:40 PM
2

Just the males?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 03:08 PM
1

The DM is very sensationalist and keen to stamp stories with its own brand of moral outrage. Its reliable enough in the sense that the stories usually exist in some form, but I wouldn't rely on any details being accurate or unbiased.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:30 AM
13

It hasn't gotten much better
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:00 PM
1

The real problem isnt what some feminists choose to believe. The real problem is that, legally speaking, they're right in a lot of places.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 07:17 AM
0

Seems to me that the fairest approach would be a sliding scale of access according to your past behaviour as a parent. You refuse access granted by a court order? The order reverses, and you have the same access rights as the father had. On the other hand, if the non-custodian parent consistently defies the agreement by not seeing the child at the agreed times, then their access is reduced at incremental stages: if parents are supposed to agree access between themselves and it doesn't happen, th…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 06:43 AM
2

A text I got from a friend after she gave birth the other day: giving birth is like having a really satisfying shit
/r/MensRights12/08/13 09:30 AM
1

The only real way to combat that is to have the camera on a fixed mount, and record all patrols from start to finish. It won't stop the accusations, but it will provide evidence that he was filming before he came across the half naked trespassers.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 08:45 AM
3

My child is still a twinkle in his/her daddy's eye at the moment. Thanks though!
/r/MensRights04/07/13 04:50 PM
10

It depends on the situation. In this particular case (women giving dirty looks to a man in the family area) I'd opt for the same approach of being openly sweet and charming for a few reasons: they're only giving dirty looks. Like it or not, any reaction from you turns you into the aggressor, and reinforces exactly what they have against you in the first place. my child is there. They don't need to see an argument, especially one which they might perceive to be their fault (Daddy wouldn't be here…
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:35 PM
1

Here in the UK, the norm seems to be to have changing facilities incorporated into the (unisex) disabled toilets. It seems to work well.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 03:20 PM
2

If we're thinking in terms of law, he is suffering a loss as a result of criminal actions committed against him. I can't see any reason why he wouldn't be able to sue the perpetrator to recover those losses. Government takes from him to support the child, he sues his abuser to recover that money. The fact that they're the same person should be irrelevant.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 06:58 PM
0

Completely missed that you'd posted a link there. My apologies, I'm going to read that now. Edit: the links you posted to that other comment work now too. Reddit must be be syncing slowly or something.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:33 PM
4

Do you have a link to that study? On it's own, it doesn't seem to say much. The fact that it only refers to intimate partners already limits it, before we look at any other conditions. I assume by your comparison to the figures of women being raped that it only refers to violence against men. Do we know what percentage of participants were m-f couples? a lack of representation of gay couples could easily skew the stats. The thing is, we’re both working on flawed numbers. The fact that so many at…
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:30 PM
-1

Meh, must be me. I'm just going to assume you're referring to my other comment along the same lines in this thread :-)
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:16 PM
-1

"There doesn't seem to be anything here"
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:12 PM
2

Yes. As far as I'm aware, that's true. Do you know differently?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:06 PM
-1

Do you have a source which says otherwise?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:05 PM
0

I disagree. Rather than promoting the idea that it's man on man, I think the use of the word 'violated' is intended to make the point that women can be the perpetrators too - it's impossible for a woman to commit rape in the UK.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 03:01 PM
3

Again though, that's because it's a UK charity, and under UK law, men actually cannot be raped by women, so using the word rape would immediately destroy the point they're trying to make. And yes, they say the majority of perpetrators are male. Do you have a source which suggests otherwise?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 02:57 PM
3

Also, if she was abusing children in 2011, why was she not in prison?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 10:10 AM
7

Nor anyone else's. And yet his arguments are considered irrelevant on that basis.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 05:43 AM
11

SRS is Australian?
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:06 PM
5

I initially misunderstood what 'privs' was short for, and was about to point out that OP hasn't yet had a physical transition, so has nothing to 'check'
/r/MensRights27/04/13 04:28 PM
1

And by the time all this happens, society has become more enlightened, and he is not required to pay any child support for the children who are not his.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 09:00 AM
3

Yes, but while she'll never mention that persons name without a paternity test, there's a strong chance he'll be brought into the picture very quickly as soon as it becomes apparent that a) she cheated, and b) the person she 'wanted' to be the father has no obligations, financial or otherwise, towards her.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:52 AM
0

That would defeat the object to me. To me, the whole point would be that I can use the same wording, the same commentary, the same advertising concepts as the original. The idea is to simultaneously troll those who thought the original was a legitimate concept, and to make a statement about the inequality of such sites.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:36 AM
6

I have, on more than one occasion, been tempted to set up replica "reverse" sites. Not just for feminist, but all of the 'acceptable ' discriminations. Exactly the same values, exactly the same mission statement, but with the gender/race reversed... For no other reason than to see the reaction from the very same people who started the original site. In theory, any lawsuit based attempt at suppression should be easily arguable with "they did it first and have 10x more members than us" (because ye…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 09:30 PM
2

The part that confused me? This persons online persona is a male cartoon with quite a substantial Facebook following.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:11 PM
2

I do agree with you on pretty much all fronts, but to summarise your argument: Yes, the double standard sucks, but these particular guys didn't take offence. Until someone trys this on a public figure who publicly takes offence at the unwarranted contact, this isn't going to change. Its a fact of life right now that you and I are going to be ridiculed if we take this shit seriously. That can change, but its going to take a public figure taking a stand before it does, and unfortunately, that isn'…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:19 PM
10

My parents divorced when I was about 8 (1988 or so). I was raised by my dad. My parents gave me the choice and I chose my dad because mum was the disciplinarian and dad let me get away with anything. In hindsight, I was nowhere near mature enough to make that decision, and although I feel bad for my mum, to this day I have a huge amount of respect for mum because back then (and now) mum was the default custodian, so it took a huge leap on her part to let me choose. That one decision on her part …
/r/MensRights19/04/13 07:10 PM
10

The same can be said for pretty much everyone who works for a living. Everyone has that one procedure that no one follows because its ridiculous and counterproductive. The bosses know no one follows it, and in fact advocate not following it. Basically, that procedure is there for one reason only: its an easy catch all if they want to fire you, because no one follows it. And the solution is the same: follow the procedure. Unfortunately, because most women are socially functional, that doesn't tra…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:41 PM
3

This was posted on a Facebook page I subscribe to. Or did, until I was banned for disagreeing. It seems to me that anyone who buys into this is clearly completely unable to identify any kind of reasonable boundaries or social cues, and accepts that they lack control to such a degree that as soon as any contact is initiated, they immediately perceive themselves to be the victim. I can't even begin to imagine what horrific life experiences someone must have been through to have had such an effect …
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:23 PM
7

This, on the same day that Rape Crisis tried to defend false accusations by saying that only 1 in 20 rape accusations can be proven to be false.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:44 PM
9

Given that they themselves point out the difference between 'false accusations' and 'not enough evidence', we can probably safely assume that the 5% quoted refers to proven false allegations, rather than those where there is 'not enough evidence' to prove anything either way. If that's the case, 1 in 20 claims can be proven to be false, and we have no idea how many more false allegations are not proven because there is 'not enough evidence'. That's actually considerably more than I expected. Wha…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter