TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

timmyburns Archive

View 1 posts and 90 comments by timmyburns on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
258

Discriminationtimmyburns/r/MensRights02/05/14 11:32 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

No kidding. Why are tax payers funding this vile human for the next 20 years. Put a bullet in her head behind the courthouse and toss her useless corpse into the fucking dumpster.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/18 10:02 PM
1

I hear your solution; you want to be just as much of a worthless little bitch as they are. Go ahead and do it, that's fine. I just think you're a weak useless soyboy for thinking that will solve anything. Merry Christmas! Maybe Santa will bring you a set of balls.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:00 PM
-1

Youre wrong but it doesn't even matter. No one should be fired because they said something 'offensive' unless you're a little bitch loser who can't hear certain words. Second no one should be 'offended' by a phrase that was created by a bunch of weak loser chumps unless they themselves are a weak ass punk bitch. Make sense? Keep playing your shitty little games with these other losers - you fit right in. Hey at least both of you can talk about how words hurt your feelings while you drink your so…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 08:06 PM
0

Oh his sex and race you say. In other words.. his identity? Stop being such a little bitch and being offended by stupid shit. Stop playing their game. You're no better than they are.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:18 PM
1

What offensive phrase did she use?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:03 PM
-1

'white male privilege' isn't an identity politics phrase?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:54 PM
4

Well that other person is a straight up idiot too dumb and weak to consider the only reason they believe the horseshit they do; because they've been indoctrinated to think that way. But this is merely cultural marxism in action. This was by design and is exactly what post modernism is advocating. They want to divide every person in any way possible so race is a great start. However, I don't think we're at our limits yet. Sure we're not a physically strong as before but that's because we no longe…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:53 PM
-1

No, ya dingus, I'm saying identity politics is a bad game and we shouldn't play it. And you should stop saying it's a good idea to play the identity politics game because that will end up reducing everyone and everything to shit. In saying; stop celebrating identity politics, even when it appears to be happening in your favor. All you've done is won a shitty game that, even if played well, just makes everything worse. I'm saying; stop making shit worse.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:45 PM
-4

Yes so normal logical people need to seize back those places of power (which should never have been handed over to these lunatics in the first place, that was also part of playing their shitty game)
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:22 PM
-2

So you're saying if they got no response or attention when they cried 'white privilege' you think they'd keep doing it? Have you ever been around a child? If you entertain their shitty behavior (play their game), they keep behaving in a shitty way. If you don't allow them to get their way when they throw a fit, they stop.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:09 PM
3

LOL sounds like a bullshit article. How do they know the upper bounds of human existence? We may very well be in late Rome, though, but that certainly doesn't mean we've 'peaked'
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:07 PM
-1

No, you stand up and say, 'hey shit head, that's a fucking stupid game and we're not playing it'
/r/MensRights08/12/17 03:48 PM
43

I don't know man.. these SJWs have created a really shitty game where everyone loses. If we decide to play, even if we play it really well, it's still a really shitty game we're playing. Doesn't sound like a win to me. It sounds like the break down of communication and civilization.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 01:11 PM
1

This makes me so furious I'm sick to my stomach. That poor child.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 02:00 PM
63

Buzzword bingo!
/r/MensRights10/09/17 02:49 PM
8

Good - Damore told the truth. I hope Google goes bankrupt. Justice would be served. Discrimination under any label is dispicable.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 11:19 PM
6

I see. Which part triggered you? Was it the part about how bad it is to reduce people to a group identity since people are individuals and should be treated as individuals? Was it the part that said women on average have more openness as a personality trait? That woman on average are more agreeable than men? Or that women on average have lower stress tolerance? Where on the doll did your daddy touch you? You can tell us, it's okay. We're here to help. No where in this paper did James state that …
/r/MensRights14/08/17 07:43 PM
15

The problem is whether someone would let that assumption affect their opinion of a candidate for a job opening, raise, or promotion. You're exactly right. And the memo was, at least in part, discussing how Google is doing exactly that by letting someone's race, sex, or sexual preference be a defining characteristic for getting a job. Google should be under investigation if they are not hiring based strictly on merit, qualifications, or ability. This is precisely what the memo states. So what's y…
/r/MensRights14/08/17 06:24 PM
10

Never once has anything resembling your claim emerged from the memo. You've made the claim, now the burden is on you to prove it. Link to the memo, cite the page, paragraph, and text, or retract your erroneous claim.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:56 PM
10

The person suggesting women stay out of coding is the memo author, not google. Where in the memo was that said? Please quote. The person suggesting and showing that women are right to go to HR, is the memo author. I am unable to parse this - are you suggesting the James thought the right thing to do for women after reading his scientifically accurate memo was to go to HR and get him fired? Why would James advocate for his own termination? His source that concludes women are more neurotic is his …
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:46 PM
7

In your opinion, what was the worst thing said in the memo? Please provide a quote, page #, etc.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:34 PM
9

What was the most egregious, insulting, and bigoted thing you found in the memo? Please provide a direct quote.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:33 PM
19

Example? Could you cite that section?
/r/MensRights14/08/17 05:32 PM
19

They're following their instructions. Academia for the past 3 decades has imbued in them the post modern ethos. They have literally been trained to think this way. This isn't an accident, this is by design.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 01:22 AM
22

Postmodernism requires an oppressed, and an oppressor. Their ideology would fall apart without constantly being the victim of something.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 01:28 AM
12

Don't confuse impartial objectivity with what you're doing; pontificating on an entirety useless point for the sake of technical correctness.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 04:44 PM
9

And getting divorced is expensive. People who have money can afford it. People who are broke probably just split up but never go through the process.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:13 PM
1

Or a vulnerability in one of the apps the user has on the phone.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 01:52 AM
5

If the phone is turned off after its stolen. If the phone is still on, the disk has been decrypted since the last boot.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 08:51 PM
14

I want to hear from someone she knows. Does she feel ashamed? Does she regret acting like a god damn animal? She got what was coming to her that's for sure.. I just would like to know if she understands that.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/15 01:03 AM
8

Why are these people trying to establish equal outcomes? The only thing this ideology will accomplish is a lower outcome for everyone. Yes, it will be equal, but the cost is that everyone suffers worse than if we did not attempt to institutionalize equal outcomes. Women have the opportunity to sacrifice time for advancement in the workplace. It just takes hard work. The same amount of time and work that it would take a man to achieve the same advancement. Apparently the authors of this report do…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:17 PM
10

When you call someone a pussy, you're saying their being weak or timid. In other words, the exact definition of pussilanimous. If you infer the speaker is talking about a woman, or making a comparison to a woman, then that's on you.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:21 PM
36

Pussy, in the context of calling someone weak, is the shortened version of the word pussilanimous, which means to show a lack of courage or be timid. Referring to female genitalia as a pussy probably derived from calling females 'pussycats'. The word has two different meanings. Just because you've made an incorrect association doesn't mean the word itself is bad.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:35 PM
-3

An interesting point. I know I'm going against the narrative in this sub but I'm really trying to understand both sides. I'm not particularly 'pro-cutting' but I'm also against the absolute anger presented when someone has been circumcised. If I may inject some humor here, let's consider the motto, 'No more circumcision! We want to cum faster while getting head!'
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:50 PM
-4

It sounds like a lot of your specific case was due to a religious ceremony (bris, right?) which maimed your body. That sounds awful and I'm sorry that you went through that. It's clearly left an impression on you. But what about a medical circumcision? When I was a few hours old a surgeon snipped my foreskin. I have no memories of this, I have never had any thoughts about my penis being diseased or otherwise, and it's actually been a positive experience for me, looking back on my sexual life. I …
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:40 PM
-2

Okay, I think I understand what you're saying, but let me rephrase. You knew at 5 years old that your penis was different and 'botched' based on what you saw through swimsuits?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:17 PM
-6

How did you know your penis looked dead or diseased? Did you have the ability to compare to other uncut penises?
/r/MensRights26/06/14 02:03 PM
-2

My favorite part of this paper: "Negative psychological consequences as a result of amputation and mutilation are well reported in the literature and there is no reason to believe that loss or partial loss of the penis is exempt." I don't remember my circumcision. It has never, ever negatively affected my psyche. I'm tempted to believe that people who think it has are being coached into having these 'damaged psyches' by those writing these reports, akin to how people who regret sex are coached i…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 01:25 PM
11

If I match every one of those criteria, do I go Super Sayan?
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:06 PM
3

It's the handle of a reddit user who commented in this thread. www.reddit.com/user/i_are_pant
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:06 AM
1

Men's rights issues are things like, being the only gender available for drafting if the selective service is ever re-enabled, or the propagation of lies such as, 'Women make 70% of what men make for the same job!' or defining rape as something only a man can commit. I will agree, 100%, that there are cases where the judicial system is negatively biased towards men (rape cases, child custody, divorce). I will not agree that, in this specific instance that the OP posted about, that bias was at pl…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:32 PM
1

Because the pay gap is not a valid issue at all, and if feminists want to claim it as their own that is fine, but it is still not a valid issue. I really, really must be missing the point, because what I understand here is that you are trying to tell me that, even though this issue is not valid, you still wish to claim it as a men's rights issue? If I am missing the point, then you don't have to reply, maybe I'm just not smart enough to understand it. =/
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:30 PM
0

I actually agree that men and women are treated differently in society. Also, the wage gap does not exist. Finally, the number of men raped in prison exceeds the number of women raped outside of prison. So no, the issue of 'asshole misogynists' refusing to pay women equal wage is not a trend. It may happen sparingly, but that does not mean it's a feminist issue. Men are NOT raped less frequently, this is quite the opposite. Therefore, rape should NOT be claimed as a women's issue. In keeping con…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:40 PM
0

I still maintain that this is a psychotic human issue. The primary issue here is that this human (who is a woman) is mentally unstable. They are leveraging the known workings of the law, and pandering to authorities, in order to inflict damage. I have no proof, but I would say that anyone who is crazed enough, and can play up their emotions enough, and can feign that they are in danger enough, could provide the same result. If this is an issue disproportionately affecting men, then this same iss…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:49 AM
-1

A man place a restraining order against a woman. She violated it. She was arrested. This happened multiple times. Also http://www.menslegal.com/ So we agree that somewhere the along the line the protocol for restraining orders needs to be tightened up. Alright. Progress!
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:20 PM
1

You realize there is a whole subreddit for that, right? Isn't that what /r/feminism is about? (And why MRA dislikes them?) It's impressive that you are all your own enemies. I can't believe the people in /r/feminism aren't coming over her to jerk you all off. You all complain about shitty things that happen, stretch it into a sexism issue, and then post in your respective subreddits for the jerk-off-fest to continue. We're all equal. Some shit goes down that isn't fair, but no one said life woul…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:09 PM
-1

Then I advise you not to enter /r/Glitch_in_the_Matrix because if you read all of those similar stories, by your logic you must then extrapolate we are in fact in The Matrix, and you're head will explode (or you'll be hunted by dudes in black suits)
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:58 PM
-5

By the way, this logic: check out any of the other dozens of posts here of either personal experiences or news story where female-on-male violence is legitimized and victims are stripped of recourse. is total shit. To prove my point, head over to /r/paranormal for dozen of posts of either personal experience or news stories where ghosts are legitimized. By your logic, ghosts are an absolute certainty.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:42 PM
0

I'm not blaming the OP for being in a relationship with the girl. I dated a crazy, and I mean crazy as shit girl for years and years. I never once said that OP should not have been in a relationship with her, I stated that she acted this way because she's nuts. I have known sociopaths, both male and female, and when they want to manipulate someone they are very convincing
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:31 PM
-2

The issue is I'm not a great actor, or a great liar, and I'm also not batshit insane, so I can't really sell the story line.. BRB I'm gonna go find a drug-addict downtown and see if he'll do it for $5 or something.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:26 PM
-1

There are so many baseless allegations being made in those two sentences, I don't even know where to start. I've remember reading a horrific story about a mother being arrested in her home, brought to jail, being admitted as insane, and being stripped naked while she plead for mercy from the male AND female guards that ripped her clothing off of her. Of course, I don't have a link to this, so I will meet your conjecture with conjecture of my own!
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:24 PM
1

Sounds like the law needs to be tightened up, then. I know some folks in WV and Maryland and I'm tempted to see if those males would provide us with a real-time test/experiment. Alas, that sounds far too risky!
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:22 PM
-5

1) No, not in this application. However, if the OP was actually violating the order then it would have been justice. These protocols are in place for a reason and that is because most times they work, therefore, they must be followed. 2) Yes. I have personally (within my family) seen this happen. 3) I am completely unsure. What types of support services are available for women charged with restraining orders that are not available for men?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:16 PM
-5

Nice paint brush. How'd you get it to make such broad strokes?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:11 PM
-12

It is unfortunate any time our legal system is abused. Manipulative people can be very persuasive. I am not condoning her actions, as I am certain your life has been turned upside down due to them. But without some evidence, like her testifying that she was doing it just to ruin you and got away with it because she is a woman, all we have is a crazy person who was able to cleverly exploit our legal system to hurt another human. I sincerely do hope that you are doing better now, brother.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:09 PM
0

OP did state that the cops showed up at his house because his exwife continued to call them so much that they did it just to get her to stop calling. Now, you're a dispatcher, you see (without any knowledge of the situation) that you're getting a call for a guy that has violated his restraining order a few times, and he's been arrested a few times - the police can't simply ignore that information. It seems that once the first cal was put in, the situation snowballed. I'm not sure, and can't say …
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:01 PM
-11

You can assure me that you couldn't pull the same shit? What good is that? That's not proof. That's conjecture. Are we now a subreddit that is content with hearsay as long as the woman is the bad guy in the story?
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:53 PM
-8

It sure sounds like it. I don't like in Maryland or WV, but the OP states that there is a loophole where a restraining order can be charged without much evidence. Is this loophole only available for women? I have no idea. We don't have that information.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:50 PM
-4

How was this man victimized solely because he was a man? The OP states that his wife found a loophole in the ability to generate a restraining order out of thin air, then she exploited it endlessly.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:49 PM
-7

I agree, and I'll get downvoted, too. The wife was bonkers. The police were following protocol. The wife found a loophole in the system, which the OP admits is a loophole, and exploited it endlessly. It sucks, for sure, but it's got nothing to do with gender, and everything to do with a mentally unstable human.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:47 PM
-10

EDIT: Go ahead and hit the downvote button now. There is no reddiquette here. Just disagree, hit the downvote, and move along because my statement is contradictory to what you already believe, and why would anyone want to discuss anything with a person who doesn't agree with them? You married a psychopathic human - this has very little to do with her being a woman - and you're now assuming that if the situation had been reversed nothing would have happened? Your ex-wife is a lunatic. It's got no…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:44 PM
1

Oh. Right.. I'm the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and I anecdotally say that you're incorrect!
/r/MensRights02/11/12 11:37 AM
1

Source? Are you just speaking hearsay evidence? Cause my statement was police protocol. If you've got evidence showing otherwise, I'd enjoy seeing it.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:46 PM
2

I don't think the actual recording is illegal, but the video may not be admissible in a court of law as evidence if it was recorded without consent. Source: I'm not a lawyer, wife was a news reporter.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 05:16 PM
2

We're all of African descent, pal. Quit being dramatic.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 01:46 PM
7

So you think that both the person who reported being approached and bear hugged, and the person who reported being approached and asked questions, you think that neither felt threatened? And what, they just reported it because they got jollies from it? As I said, and have kept repeating (but all that plays in your head is 'males are always victims of unfair treatment!') is that we don't know enough to make a call - Maybe this really is an over-reaction, maybe it's not, but we simply can't call t…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 01:45 PM
7

That's a stretch. Stop making every man a victim. Sometimes legitimate creepers get arrested. Until we know more, we can't say for sure.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:44 AM
12

She felt threatened enough to report this as an issue. You don't have a video clip of the scene, so we can't say if the dude asked in a creepy way, or in a non-chalant way. Are you saying that the reporting of the issue is the problem? Are people just not supposed to report incidents to the police? Now, if this same woman had reported other issues that ended up being based on her own paranoia, then maybe you've got a reasonable standing here. Otherwise, if this woman is not report-happy, and not…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:32 AM
5

Right but the issue is that if asked, the police must file a report. This report goes up the chain to someone who investigates it. If, earlier that day, the same guy (based on descriptions given in the report) had assaulted someone (I'll break here and state that a bear hug unfortunately qualifies as assault) and then 8 hours later uses the same line when approaching someone else whom the guy made feel uncomfortable, then a warrant may be issued (discretion applied) and if a warrant is issued, t…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:22 AM
16

In the SECOND police report. In the first police report, filed a few hours earlier, the 'suspect' had bear hugged a woman from behind and gave the same excuse. Source: http://www.mupolice.com/clery/index.php So, we've got this guy who at 9am bear hugs a woman and when she freaks out (and, I'd guess that would be surprising) he says, 'Oh sorry I thought I knew you' and then at 5pm the guy gives the same line to another girl. I'm not saying that this guy is a criminal, but I certainly think he's v…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 04:11 AM
1

I like money. I also like free competition and new technology. When you patent vague things like, 'It has shapes and kinda looks like our OS' and have billions to hire a legal team that can make these things stick, it is unfair to the consumer. What huge mobile technology leaps have we seen since the iPhone came out 8 years ago? None? Maybe, you know, cause Apple sues the fuck out of anyone who dares innovate a device that in some way resembles a device? He's holding it in his hand! He's holding…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:55 PM
2

Because I think Apple is a bully and sues everyone in sight in order to gain market share and stifle competition. If Google's suit succeeds it would be a nice punch landed square on the nose of, in my opinion, the biggest tech bully out there. Posted from my MacBook
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:45 PM
1

Personally I think it would be a sweet tray of whatfor if Google was able to sue Apple and remove Apple's ability to sell iPhones/iPads/MacBooks in the US.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:14 PM
0

Which is why I'm saying it's silly. I'm betting you dollars to donuts that, on any street corner, you could hold up that green logo for the grocery store and ask people if they recognize the logo, and they wouldn't. Of course, this is pure conjecture, since I don't have the tenacity to execute this task. Also, I think that doing so just to prove a point to another redditor would be kinda dick. But I was seriously interested in articles about other companies doing things like this because I reall…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 04:00 PM
0

You would honestly look at a big green apple in the shape of a 'W' and think, 'Oh yes, Apple Computers!' Rhetorical. Of course you wouldn't. That's like looking at a picture of a dumpster tire and saying, 'Oh, circles, that must be Audi, the Olympics, Lucent Technologies, and Oprah all in one!'
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:26 PM
2

I know that there are lawsuits abound, but was not aware of other companies filing such frivolous suits as Apple does I'd love to be able to speak in a more educated way on this subject - do you have any links to other companies filing for such silly suits? Apple, being the one in the spotlight all the time, is all I hear about.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 03:15 PM
7

No, because Komen suing small charities into submission is no better than what Apple does. Just because you've got TWO bullies doing the same bullying doesn't make it right.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 01:00 PM
1

Life is avoidable. You can kill yourself - that is your right as a human.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:57 PM
-1

Ahh yes, the Texas Sharpshooter.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:38 PM
-2

I believe that my reference was slightly more equivalent than comparing ducks to mortgages, but I digress. The issue is: People actively engage in things that produce risk all the time. Driving your car can kill you, drinking soda can cause illness, smoking cigaretts, gambling, etc the list goes on. Now, I saw OP here not considering that at all with his statement. I saw, 'Marriage is bad cause it could ruin your life,' Yes, but so could driving your car to work. If you are not fit to be married…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:05 PM
-3

If you think marriage is something you 'deal with' then you are right: You should not marry as you are not fit to be married.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:52 PM
-5

Since you're not likely to reply, here is my logic: You do not wish to participate in marriage because it could possibly fail, and result in your life being seriously screwed up. However, every day you actively participate in life, which is 100% certain to fail because you're going to die one day, which will of course result in your life being seriously screwed up (that's an understatement) You are willing to deal with life every day, which has some crappy parts to it, no doubt! Why? Probably be…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:23 PM
-1

My question was, why do you continue to go on living if you know that someday you are going to die? If you are not going to answer the direct question then say so, but tiptoeing around the subject is silly.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:08 PM
-4

What you're avoiding is the question. Why do you live a life that is surely going to end in death? All sorts of unpleasant things are associated with this. Haircuts, oil changes, doctors visits, paying taxes, other people dying Why don't you just end it now and not have to worry about that? If you do not wish to answer the question, that's fine, but please say so instead of dodging it.
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:58 PM
-4

But you can't and my statement is still valid. You are going to die. There is no chance here. Why do you continue to live when you know you're going to die? Why not just die now and not worry about money/housing/jobs the rest of your life?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:47 PM
2

The 50% statistic includes people who are on their second, third, and fourth marriages. Obviously if you include people who were already divorced, the chances of them getting divorced again are higher. Here is a link with some stats: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr049.pdf If you look at page 4, you will see that out of the sample size only 36.9% of first women's marriages ended in divorce. For men, only 26.8% of first marriages ended in divorce. This is still a very high rate, I will agre…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:20 PM
2

Marriage was originally a thing to be certain that the parents of a child stayed together long enough to raise the child. This grew in popularity as we deviated from our roots as tribal humans - the tribe would raise the child and the parents of that child were not really more or less involved in the child's upbringing than anyone else in the tribe. Marriage is what you make of it. You have to be honest with yourself about yourself and your partner. People who get divorced probably saw warning s…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:10 PM
-5

Life also has a 100% death rate, but you go on living each day - Why? You know you're going to die - that's definitely a life-ruining thing. So why do you continue living?
/r/MensRights31/08/12 02:04 PM
2

And 'senile prolapsed asshole' That's some poetic shit.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:04 PM
82

I'm not a /r/seduction reader, but I'd like to point out what I feel was the most important part of the whole story: outcome independent Not having any ties to the outcome of an event is paramount, not only with socializing, but in life (my humble opinion) By not associating your interactions with any outcome, you allow the event to unfold in a more natural way, which increases the chances of a positive outcome greatly. Pure conjecture. I'm just speaking of my life experience. I'm glad you saw s…
/r/seduction13/03/12 10:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter