TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tinkertoy1260 Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by tinkertoy1260 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And literally the only line in the article that mentions it in a in way shape or form.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:32 PM
-10

That's not an inherent quality of being a woman. It's a result of choices they make and circumstances they are likely to find themselves in. You generally don't find women in dangerous places. So I would argue that a female police officer has just as much chance of being subject to violence as a male one.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 05:24 PM
3

I'm all for being outraged as much as the next guy.... But this is a bit of a reach. Talk to me when you actually find some "cry bullies" defending her behavior.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 09:28 PM
1

I don't think I understood what you were trying to do in your original post. So if I understand correctly you DON'T actually want a "win" here, you want Julie to get a light slap on the wrist, in an attempt to set precedent for future cases so that the laws can't be abused later? That's a thing? Does that actually work? I have never heard of anyone doing that before. It's pretty clever. I'm surprised at the professional and courteous reaction your getting because I would have though the police w…
/r/MensRights23/08/16 01:49 PM
2

Umm...k?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:27 AM
-1

Commentary was pretty shit. Sorry.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 03:26 AM
2

Why archive this? You don't want this blog post to get clicks?
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:52 PM
46

The fact that there are very few of them is exactly the reason they are a protected class. By default their needs are ignored in favor of the majority. But it is a real legitimate condition that some people have and we live in a society that believes everyone deserves dignity and respect, so we do our best to be inclusive whenever possible. It's the same reason we have handicap parking spots, and crosswalks that beep, and braille written on doors signs. I don't think it is right to do so to the …
/r/MensRights21/08/16 05:37 PM
33

Actually I'm quite sure that there is a significant contingent of people, forums, YouTube channels, blogs, and entire subreddit devoted to ogling female Olympic athlete's spandex and bikini-clad asses. The only thing unusual about this post in particular is that it is mixed into a mainstream news blog, which granted wouldn't fly if the genders were reversed but it's not like "hot Olympic chicks" is a taboo subject that nobody talks about for fear of reprisal.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 05:06 PM
1

Worth a chuckle, although the analogy is a little weak, and IMHO this is some pretty low-effort content for this sub.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 09:17 PM
-1

Beef curtains. We do it too
/r/MensRights26/07/16 03:46 PM
2

literally the very first line
/r/MensRights18/07/16 01:55 PM
0

There's a down vote button right fucking there. Why don't you just use it and move on?
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:39 AM
3

It's a marketing schtick. Every fledgling business tries to do SOMETHING to make themselves stick out and look special. The "look at me I'm a woman" thing is trendy right now. But so is "look at me I'm all natural / organic / gluten free", and so is "look at me I'm hipster / artisan / trendy". Before that it was "look at me I'm online", and "look at me I'm not cruel to animals". Don't forget "look at me I'm [real ethnic culture / processes here]" or "look at me I'm a local business born and rais…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 04:39 AM
13

Businesses fail with no fanfare all of the time
/r/MensRights11/07/16 04:13 AM
12

You're using the term "public property" awfully loosely. Thisbis the Internet. The relevance of ANY of these laws needs to be duked out in the supreme court before they can be applied sonlin effectively. Sure Facebook can do this. It's just a matter of determining if they are intentionally conspiring against us with a political agenda, and if so, what does the world think of that kind of bias and censorship on such a public communication platform. Perhaps service providers like Facebook should b…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 04:02 AM
5

I think it's a very reasonable to presume that whoever left that note decided that she couldn't possibly be a veteran because she was a woman. Notice the "lady" thrown in to that note? Maybe misogyny isn't the right word, but it's definitely sexist. And the way the word "misogynist" is used in common parlance it fits here. So... yeah, "lady" is perfectly justified IMHO to be pissed as fuck.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 08:06 PM
2

Pretty sure it's just one of many ways to try and show respect by giving them some sort of perk. It's not a utilitarian benefit for a specific purpose, veterans don't "need" dedicated parking spots, and that is exactly why giving it to them is a way of showing appreciation and saying thanks.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 08:02 PM
5

/thread
/r/MensRights14/06/16 07:48 PM
2

Never really thought aboutnit that way but.... You're right. Funny how it feels different when you're on the other side of the argument.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 01:31 AM
57

Jesus when you see the video for yourself you see how utterly absurd and asanine this is. Notice how Trudeau's actions were met with applause initially? Everyone in the room saw what was going on. The dude was essentially being bullied and Trudeau stepped in and did something about it. Then the woman and her friends freak out unnecessarily and draw attention to some imaginary slight against them and blow it out of proportion - its has nothing to do with Trudeau's elbow, its just a tactic to win …
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:49 PM
1

...okay?
/r/MensRights19/05/16 04:48 AM
1

Exactly. I, for example, really couldn't care less about whether tampons are taxed by the government or not. It doesn't affect me, so I don't care. I have never put any significant thought towards it even when I DID hear about it. Its very understandable.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 11:00 PM
6

All this hubbub comes down to GFS being accused of excluding women from jobs on the basis that they were unqualified for the job. GFS's in-house strength test determined they were unqualified, and the OFCCP thinks they were. So really this all comes down to the strength test. Was it a fair test that accurately assessed the ability to do this particular job? Or was GFS setting the bar unreasonably high which resulted in unnecessarily excluding the majority of women who are weaker than men? But ze…
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:58 PM
0

No... No that's not what OP was saying at all. "The safety of women with a trans-girl in the bathroom" = the unreasonable fear that the trans-girl (e.g. biologically male person) is going to assault the women in the bathroom, which the OP agrees is unreasonable Vs. "The safety of a a trans-man in the men's bathroom" = the arguably much more real danger that the men in the bathroom will beat the shit out of a trans-man, which is, I think, a legitimate concern for a trans-person in a place like a …
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:31 PM
3

Well at least she's honest
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:26 PM
1

Can anyone ELI5 how this lawsuit differs from the original one?
/r/MensRights27/04/16 01:16 AM
1

There really is no good reason to throw unsolicited insults at a stranger, male or female, whether you're calling them a slut, a neckbeard, fat, ugly, or that they walk funny. Let people be and leave them alone.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 02:51 PM
3

/r/titlegore ?
/r/MensRights22/04/16 06:53 AM
10

Til "extreme contempt" == "she was older and less attractive than my standards and I didn't want her"
/r/MensRights19/04/16 09:40 PM
0

Dont give her any ideas, with her attitude if she decided to be more forward she will probably end up raping someone.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 09:36 PM
11

/r/pussypass is that-a-way
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:58 AM
2

This all seems very reasonable, what's the problem?
/r/MensRights15/04/16 02:35 PM
1

It's really no big deal at all. What matters is the behavior of the person wearing the blue hair, not the hair itself. Maybe you could say there's a correlation between brightly coloured hair and unprofessional behaviour, and maybe you could argue that some employers would - consciously or subconsciously - make judgements of your character based on that. Maybe you could argue that judging someone based on their looks is an inevitable part of life,. We could argue all day if that is how the world…
/r/MensRights12/04/16 12:08 AM
2

serious question - if you get circumcised much later in life e.g. in your teenage years as opposed to when you were an infant - will it heal up the same way in a reasonable amount of time?
/r/MensRights10/04/16 04:06 PM
1

This pretty much proves he's wrong https://youtu.be/wlGWOBpZObg
/r/MensRights03/04/16 07:06 AM
1

This argument I have always considered to be fairly disingenuous. Yes, this did really happen, and yes it was horrifying and terrible, and it disproportionately affected men. These men died horrifically and we should never forget that. But, I was never on that beach. Neither were you. And it's extremely unlikely we will ever be in that situation in our lifetime. Similarly, you are almost certainly never going to be on a sinking Titanic letting the women and children leave first. These men sacrif…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 03:59 PM
2

Honestly I think this video is a big crock of shit.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:59 AM
1

You basically want a Wiki of sorts to keep everything organized - stats, quotes, links to various sources and examples etc., a compendium of information that can be grown and referenced. Sounds a lot like what you've already linked above. Especially Wikimannia.The problem is that you have too many of them and there isn't a defacto standard or consensus with the group. You get this effect: http://xkcd.com/927/ The solution is we all just need to start using one of them I vote Wikimannia. Only pro…
/r/MensRights11/03/16 09:22 PM
1

Don't worry bud, I'm not actually talking to you, I'm talking to everyone else who might stumble into this thread in the future.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 02:56 AM
2

You know it's funny, it is very rare that the word "misogynistic" can actually be correctly applied to anyone. People don't usually hate women, they just get accused of "misogyny" for doing innocent things like wearing an anime shirt, or acknowledging their natural sexual attraction to women. But you, my friend, are the exception. You actually, genuinely hate women as a whole and truly believe that pretty much all of them are awful, terrible creatures, undeserving of your respect. You've boiled …
/r/MensRights02/03/16 06:55 PM
3

Well you've got spiteful, dysfunctional and sociopathic down pat I'll give you that. Need to work a bit more on your flakiness and back stabbing though.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 08:10 AM
1

I didn't see any 'slamming' or 'hypocrisy' going on. The article just describes her experience at the resort and it's amenities, which were, according to her, all pretty top notch. I could imagine reading the exact same thing about any other normal high-end ski resort. Yes this is indeed yet another example of a "women-only" thing being treated as totally okay while a "men-only" thing would be considered sexist. But aside from that I don't see much here worth reading in to and I don't see the jo…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 04:48 AM
-7

after the man drunkenly accosted her friend and then when he got rejected tried to pour his bag of potato chips on her head. i mean lets at least get the facts straight. he didn't deserve to get stabbed in the eye but it's not like he did NOTHING wrong.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:12 AM
2

You know back in english class where you were given a task to write an essay on some subject, and you were really grasping at straws to figure out something to write about, so you just made shit up and fudged in in hopes of getting a passing grade? That's what this sounds like.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 10:01 AM
8

The graph needs a third bar for "uncategorized / unknown" for stories that had tags that his system wasn't able to categorize. Without that it's pretty hard to see if the data is actually representative or not.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter