TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tjiggs Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by tjiggs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

you mean they push each other to go out and fuck. girls dont needs to vie for sex very often
/r/MensRights30/05/12 08:43 PM
1

what else happens
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:17 PM
1

i think you are missing the point, or are just being argumentative. my point is to stay away from blanket statements. the reasons are obvious.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 07:56 AM
1

i dont store links, so id refer you to the FAQ for them in regards to mens rights. i dont have such a faq for the other end. my point isnt that women dont have advantage. my point is that blanket statements need definitive proof. and there is no such thing for this. i pointed out a few cases where a woman might not have advantage. all you need to disprove a blanket statement is 1 case. in a labor/construction job, the male is likely hired before the female.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 01:50 AM
0

seemed rhetorical. with evidence? no, i dont store links. without evidence? someone posted evidence awhile back claiming that women are disadvantaged still when it comes to the top 1% area, like CEO type gigs. there are certain situations, like where a woman has shit people skills and just wants to move boxes, but wont be hired because stored discriminate such that women are the sellers, men are the laborers. or certain environments where employers are sexist. or certain harassment cases that ar…
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:55 PM
1

avoid blanket statements, its asking to be proven wrong. say women hold the majority of the advantaged or something. its also silly.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 11:37 PM
8

i took a psych of women class myself. 95% women, and reminded me humanity isnt human. "who thinks (something where women are expected to do something or disadvantaged)?" 95% say its wrong. "who thinks (something where men are expected to do something or disadvantaged)?" 95% of class think they should be disadvantaged or behave exactly as expected. that class showed such a large sense of entitlement too. please note; i said 95% of the class, i didnt say it was all the women. some men pitched in, …
/r/MensRights15/05/12 07:43 PM
10

the consensus is that MR is here for gender equality, not female advantage. due to society/information, the focus is on mens rights because of how trampled and socially acceptable it is to do so its allbout equality, for everyone. not men being stuck as the working provider who is always evil/at fault, or women being dainty creatures who need to be protected, but all human, all together, all equal ps: i am an androgynous male, i completly get the looks for when my more feminine moments show. you…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 08:00 PM
4

One lawmaker, Rep. Sue Schafer, D-Wheat Ridge, elicited laughter in the hearing room when she asked Dr. Johnson if circumcision might help reduce teen pregnancy rates and teen sexual activity by reducing nerve sensation in boys’ penises. lets permanently damage boys so society behaves how i want it to
/r/MensRights05/05/12 11:13 PM
1

? based on your responce id say there was some confusion :P but ill take that as a no
/r/MensRights28/04/12 01:18 AM
1

for science.... would you consider yourself androgynous?
/r/MensRights27/04/12 11:38 PM
1

its about the tone and wording. the focus on women/feminism.... although anything could explain it, like perhaps the western focus on feminism being untouchable(and therefore have to reiterate again and again a 'not that i hate women') i honestly didnt think much about gender when i wrote it, and its not strongly implied at all, dont worry.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 11:00 PM
1

your post implied it. either way, it means the same thing :)
/r/MensRights27/04/12 08:03 PM
2

women are human beings the same as men, both of whom are often selfish and so on. id think your proper response should be thank you for showing us there are still human beings, not the many monsters we have today.
/r/MensRights27/04/12 03:07 AM
1

personally, im for equal rights of BOTH genders, and push for them both. alot of people on here(read: non trolls) agree and want equality on both sides. if they see women being treated poorly they wont stand by.....there are plenty of the taking mens rights people too far here though as well.... im fairly certain i see more equality though. also, props to you human. you want equality and evidence. thats a great demand to have :) edit; gender
/r/MensRights27/04/12 03:03 AM
1

this is the second time. there is a context XD this is on the topic of rape cases. yes, he said she said needs evidence or it should be thrown out(part of my point)
/r/MensRights13/04/12 08:40 PM
1

well, i suppose if you want to go that route, then in societies where homosexuality is sin/social suicide then yes, having a socially safe way to 'get to it' tends to be priority for those who care about social status. in past Rome, bisexuality was standard and accepted, so choosing a male over a female wasn't weird.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:12 PM
1

what our justice system is supposed to be it is also supposed to include jury nullification for unjust laws. i responded to the point of the article, it is implied. no one is making the point that no rape laws is unjust and it is pretty easy to discredit any opposing arguments.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 03:07 PM
18

not voting guilty unless there is actual evidence fine(its what our justice system is supposed to be), never voting guilty ever, despite anything.... it is wrong edit: context. this is in regards to rape cases
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:17 AM
2

more than one culture/set of values exist
/r/MensRights11/04/12 08:04 AM
-1

feminism 1. : the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes. then second wave feminists came along and with their men are evil/the devil/ should all die the movement became twisted care to find the etemology? that would be interesting.
/r/MensRights11/04/12 07:56 AM
1

if she wasnt controlling before then this usually means one of two things. either a) she is cheating or b) she is hunting for evidence to disembowel you in divorce court. for safeties sake(and since yuo dont know tech) i'd suggest leaving the phone home and checking with a divorce lawyer to secure your bases(just in case). if divorce is the case then you wont stand a chance if she prepped. edit info to add; you can avoid being taken to the cleaners if you prepare yourself with legal counsel and …
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:44 PM
1

that was a request from the general population. ive heard often of studies that have proven loss of sensation. i want one cited so i can see.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 10:27 PM
2

someone post the medical basis for lost sensation please. to answer the question, no cut. the only reason to otherwise would be for social reasons, in which the standards always change but the damage doesn't. thats like saying we should invade iraq because everyone wants to.... wait, why aren't you guys in favor of this anymore? im ballsdeep in quagmire.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 09:46 PM
0

spermicidal lube isnt 100% prevention rate, dont depend on it
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:05 PM
4

can i get an explanation, i cant watch video atm
/r/MensRights02/04/12 06:58 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter