TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tlfreddit Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by tlfreddit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

You can’t debate this because you made up the story for internet validation in the form of upvotes, which is stupid in my opinion.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 08:51 AM

I wish it was this simple. I don’t know any man that hasn’t had at least one experience where they simply can’t get hard or stay hard for whatever reason with a chick they want to have sex with, let alone with one they don’t. If someone is getting raped they would be clearly distressed and uncomfortable, ain’t no way any bloke is getting bricked up under those conditions. Have you ever had a male doctor handle your dick? I have. Not a chance in hell I could get hard from that, even if he gave it…
/r/MensRights25/06/24 06:58 AM
-5

There is no problem. Women don’t rape men, that’s ridiculous.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 06:44 AM

But you didn’t try to force her off you? Didn’t try to leave? If you were so drunk you couldn’t do either of things, then your parasympathetic nervous system would have been inhibited to the point where you wouldn’t have got hard at all. Also, if you were drunk to the point of slipping out of consciousness no way you would have any memory at all. I don’t believe this for a second. Anyway, it’s the same if some chick says she’s been raped. You can’t condemn someone without any evidence, this is h…
/r/MensRights25/06/24 06:43 AM

You’re proving my point. Awkward boners happen by looking at someone you find sexually attractive, and you can’t really stop it, can you? No matter how hard you try, you can’t just get hard looking at someone you’re not sexually attracted to. As far as physical stimulation goes, if this was true then performance anxiety wouldn’t exist because you could just, you know, physically stimulate it.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 06:38 AM

You’re telling me old mate was too drunk to be conscious but not too drunk for some chick to get him hard? No way. I don’t agree with this women raping men phenomena. How could that even work? I tired having sex with a fat chick once but she was so unattractive to me it was an effort to get it up or stay hard. How on earth could you stay hard if you were in a stressed out situation or incredibly intoxicated in a similar situation?
/r/MensRights24/06/24 11:53 AM
-3

It’s feminists that want equal rights, are we feminists now? Women need to look after the babies and the children and be mothers, while the men go out and fight; like it’s always been. The draft for women is a good way to point out hypocrisy to feminists, but I would never support it. The last person you want next to you when you’re firing and moving or doing CQB is a woman. They are simply too weak and unaggressive. I don’t think we should actually be pushing for rubbish equality policies in re…
/r/MensRights20/06/24 07:36 PM
2

Stop feeling sorry for yourself, for starters. If you're going around with this kind of attitude no wonder you're suffering. Go and read Letters from a Stoic by Seneca. Read it faithfully. Nothing happens after you die; you just die.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 04:22 AM
3

I wonder how they’re going to replace law, politics and ethics.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 07:15 PM
1

I mentioned WLM in my very first post but it's not essential to my argument. I never said that WLM have any economic aims yet you're arguing a point against that position; hence the strawman. I brought it up, in my original comment, to elucidate a general theme among feminism in general, but like I said it's irrelevant overall. thats not what socialist feminism is Wikipedia disagrees with you on this too. for marxist or socialist feminism to even make their world view somewhat work they have to …
/r/MensRights08/06/24 11:35 PM
1

WLM doesnt want to control or regulate capitalism at all though This claim was never made; this is a straw man. youre conflating marxist feminists and liberal feminists. I'm not conflating anything. I made clear in my last post that Marxist Feminist's point to economic oppression, Radical Feminist's point to patriarchal oppression, and the two combine to form Socialist Feminism. I never even mentioned Liberal Feminism. there hasnt been any regulations in any western countries that would regulate…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:12 PM
1

This is a good tool to point out holes in logic and hypocrisy, but you certainly don't want a woman in your section/patrol if you're drafted into something like infantry, or any other combat corps. The last person I want next to me in a contact is a woman.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:37 AM
9

What they actually want I don't think they even know. They are unable to come to one foremost model of their ideology and so even talking about feminism is wrought with stringent definitional requirements - which are never met - and one side might end up arguing for Socialist Feminism, the other Radical Feminism, and when you look at data showing the proportion of the worlds women that say they are feminist, the definition aligns with neither. And in case you're curious, the survey in question a…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 09:31 AM
7

Exactly. Hegel talks about this, and basically: The rise of capitalism, in separating the family household from commodity production, further solidifies this control of men over women in the family when the latter become economic dependents of the former in the male breadwinner-female housewife nuclear family form. Importantly, capitalism also creates the possibility of women’s liberation from family-based patriarchy by creating possibilities for women to work in wage labor and become economical…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:37 AM
2

Marxist feminism holds that women are uniquely hurt by capitalism. Yes, I agree with you. Marxist Feminist's are concerned with oppression through capitalism, and are not directly focused on dismantling the patriarchy, which is the aim of Radical Feminism, and both the former and latter concerns are brought together under Socialist Feminism. However. There is some nuance to consider here. Note the following: The new “marriage” of patriarchal capitalism operates to relegate women to unpaid or les…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 06:19 AM
26

Okay so let's think about what you're saying, starting with a definition so we're on the same page: Marxist feminism analyzes the ways in which women are exploited through capitalism and the individual ownership of private property. According to Marxist feminists, women's liberation can only be achieved by dismantling the capitalist systems in which they contend much of women's labor is uncompensated. Note: women's liberation can only be achieved by dismantling the capitalist systems in which th…
/r/MensRights08/06/24 02:34 AM
1

George Orwell talks about this, and he calls it Newspeak in 1984. Basically, the control of language is a totalitarian technique to prevent any level of critical thought. Besides the prohibition of language - which we have observed - we can also observe an obfuscation of language, which is intended to hide the truth. Orwell believed that the language used was necessarily vague or meaningless because it was intended to hide the truth rather than express it. This is why it’s important that we figh…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 09:25 PM
77

Women are generally physically weaker. Women have have a time limit on their reproduction, whereas men don’t really have that. Women have to deal with periods, I’m glad as men we don’t. What a hassle. Women have to deal with the pain and the burden of child bearing. Jeez, I don’t really think there’s much else that’s unique to women, and it’s all biological and not societal.
/r/MensRights06/06/24 07:09 PM
4

Dating apps - Hinge, at least - already have body metric filters allowing users to save themselves from a process that they’ll carry out anyway. Men and women can filter for height. Can you imagine the amount of men under six foot being filtered out? Thus, if we can cancel people out for immutable characteristics, it’s only fair we can do the same for characteristics caused by people’s own bad decisions; namely, being fat. Do you disagree?
/r/MensRights04/06/24 06:57 PM
-44

This is what this sub is becoming.
/r/MensRights04/06/24 10:22 AM
2

Yeah it’s quite prevalent unfortunately. Just make sure you’re well read on the subject and can stand your ground if someone tries to challenge your ideas. Andrew Wilson and his wife Rachel Wilson are good examples in my opinion, check them out on YouTube if curious.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 06:16 AM
8

Look man, you shouldn’t even care. It’s all feminist nonsense and it really shouldn’t be bothering you. If you don’t have the wherewithal to withstand feminist garbage than you need to work on your masculinity. The problem isn’t without, it’s within, the sooner you learn that the better.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 05:50 AM
1

Why the straw man? No one said whether masculinity was a social construct or not, but regardless it doesn’t change my point. Why do I need to read a lot of books?
/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:20 AM
1

One could argue staying in the kitchen is feminine insofar as it aligns with gender roles, I suppose. If you mean equality of opportunity? Sure. Equality of outcome? Now that's just nonsense.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 09:32 PM
-18

You're not supposed to control the action of other men, that's nonsense. Why are you being such a victim in this post? Employ your rational faculties and stop getting emotional.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 04:50 AM
-3

This Is stupid. Taking initiative is masculine. Arbitrary equality is stupid in all its aspects and this one is no exception.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 05:17 AM
-3

How can you be sure he is wrong, and you are right? Be careful not to become a zealot.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 04:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter