TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tm1087 Archive

View 0 posts and 31 comments by tm1087 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Whenever I see this or DemoRATS, I disregard whatever point is being made.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/16 04:04 PM
45

After watching their interview on late night tv, we decided we will not give a penny to anyone involved in this tragedy. We will watch the original two movies with our kid instead of this garbage.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 04:06 PM
6

Are you still close? If so, is there anything we can do?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:26 AM
1

Literally, just after I wrote that, nbc news came out with the story. Disgonnabegood.gif
/r/MensRights04/02/16 11:24 PM
2

Powell and Rice did, but used it for relatively mundane tasks (e.g., scheduling, confirming and discussing non-classified materials). That is not illegal. Hillary, the day after being confirmed, began migrating most electronic communications off-site. Following the murder of Ambassador Stevens, a conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch, filed a freedom of information act request as several members of intelligence agencies told Congress members that the approved story from the White House was…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:48 AM
12

Remember, this is the same organization that listed the name of Bill Clinton's accuser and called her a liar.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 02:56 PM
6

Well, if the judge rules her behavior as admissible (which it probably will) that wall will come crashing down.
/r/MensRights09/01/16 05:49 PM
6

Seeing how they do not respect Trans people, I think it is unlikely their equations have a transitive property. /math joke
/r/MensRights29/12/15 11:41 PM
2

So, I am a political scientist and the literature is relatively clear. Women have a higher probability of winning if they decide to run. However, they are much more strategic in deciding to run. There is a debate about why this is true. Some mark it up to randomness, others focus on women's life choices that are much greater than men's life choices.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 05:55 PM
1

I can't blame him. He was trying to go from Associate to Full. I recently thought about it as well. I have a unisex first name, so they may not figure out I am an oppressor until the paper is already in print.
/r/MensRights07/12/15 03:54 PM
20

I am a political scientist. One time I looked at my old advisers CV. All of his new work are women and politics articles. So, I have dinner with him at a conference. And I asked him why he started publishing in that area. He replied that the reviewers for women and politics journals usually had doctorates in gender studies so they didn't know any statistics so it was easy to publish a bunch of articles.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 11:23 PM
3

Actually, I am surprised that oil field workers are not on the list. I live in West Texas and there are always people who die.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 11:17 PM
7

Unfortunately, state law may be different in this case. Sucks, but he will probably lose.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 07:30 PM
15

Just for comparison, political scientist Eleanor Ostrom won the Nobel Prize in Economics. She doesn't write in these newspapers; she is writing about interesting game theory applications.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 01:23 AM
1

Valentines and White day.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 03:04 AM
1

Yeah, because nothing says bro like a fedora.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 12:51 PM
1

El Duderino; if you're not into the brevity thing.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 02:32 PM
1

As a college professor, this drives me insane. We are tasked with teaching students how to think ; not what to think. If the student said, "these statistics are misguided because all women lie about rape," that may require some discipline because it is a personal attack on a subgroup with no attempt of intelligent discourse. But, if the student said, "these statistics are misguided because they overcount sexual assualts by using a questionable definition," the faculty should be in a world of tro…
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:32 AM
1

The implications of this dumpster fire of an opinion are mind boggling. First, is the problem that we have the scientific knowledge that enables testing? So, it is acceptable to use DNA technology to set wrongly accused individuals free, but is unacceptable to use it to establish responsibility of fathering? Second, why does it matter what was done hundreds of years ago? Humanity is about making mistakes, admitting them, and moving forward. Should we also revoke women's suffrage because it was l…
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:52 PM
51

At least a genuine cuck enjoys the experience.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 05:41 PM
5

I totally agree with the professor. If the accused is guilty of the charges, he should fired and removed from his position. But, the removal of his audio or video lectures should remain posted. We don't remove things of a person that are unrelated to the allegation. We don't ban Naked Gun movies because of OJ's crimes. We shouldn't ban the HBO show Girls because Dunham admitted to sexual assault and falsely accused a male of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights17/01/15 04:52 PM
2

I have posted here before on this topic, but it always seems to resurface. The original university judicial ruling is normally provided over by an university hearing officer. At my university it can be almost any tenured or tenure track faculty (although it is exceedingly rare when it is a tenure track faculty) or a senior administrator usually someone like a Dean of Students. In this case, the hearing officer listens to evidence and makes some type of ruling. Usually there is a right to appeal …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 10:14 PM
4

I am an academic and I see this prominently. But, the issue is not necessarily the authors of suppressing alternate views, but with reviewers and journal editors. Academics are interested in research questions, but are much more interested in publications, promotion, and prestige. Additionally, like any other profession, academics follow the path of least resistance in accomplishing these goals. The way an academic field weeds out things like this is by journal rejections. Trust me, if editors a…
/r/MensRights15/01/15 08:42 PM
7

This is one of the most ridiculous, ham handed, non sensical I have seen in years. She talks about hate speech and how free speech should be regulated because it causes violence. First, I am very skeptical of this argument. There are so many instances of unappealing speech not leading to anything, but deridement of their beliefs. Second, even if it was a legitimate problem, the Supreme Court has already found that true incitement to violence is not protected speech. So, she is actually advocatin…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 04:31 PM
1

The Columbia University President has been forced twice for racial and gender discrimination to appear before the Supreme Court as well. I think both were at the University of Michigan.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:42 PM
15

There is a strange reality that I came to when I read this part of the article. Like many, I work in a job where I am required to send technically sophisticated and sensitive emails. When I need to do this, I check and recheck and recheck what I am saying to ensure I don't send something overly insensitive or contrary to department policy. I normally teach advanced statistics classes. Every once in a while, I get an email that reads like, "I made a 27, 35, 45 on the first three exams. How can I …
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:47 PM
6

Breitbart occasionally publishes good journalism and sometimes publishes stupid stories that make most wonder. However, if the campus is stonewalling, it is pretty easy to find mass amounts of people on campus during the time to substantiate claims and discover facts. Almost everyone single degree program has a notable alumni page. Additionally, as soon as the accused files a law suit in federal court (which based on Dunham non-apology will be incredibly soon). They will be forced to submit to i…
/r/MensRights10/12/14 03:12 PM
3

Okay. Let's get some stuff straight. I was a GPTI at TTU while completing graduate work with multiple athletes in varying sports. They are dismissing the player because the athletics department has decided that the football player is unlikely to be a good player. In 2008, star receiver Michael Crabtree (now playing for the 49ers) was the subject of a DEA investigation. He brought a black garbage bag of weed to his birthday party. TTU only cares about athletes that are likely to produce. This is …
/r/MensRights05/07/14 02:01 AM
1

Feel horrible. The most fucked up part of the article is at the bottom "watch Jane Velez-Mitchell at 7:00 P.M on HLN." That is truly cruel and unusual punishment.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 01:27 PM
6

Actually, it is more like guilty until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 12:08 AM
1

I think for the most part, little has changed on a day-to-day basis. I wouldn't go protest (I am a university faculty member, so the costs would be especially high). I am not afraid I would lose my job, but my job would become extremely difficult and I would probably end up leaving. But, it has made me cognizant the emotional hurt and pain caused by sexual assault on men should be discussed. In that same vein, I try my best to donate money and time to organizations like Just Detention Internatio…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 12:26 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter