TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tms79 Archive

View 1 post and 367 comments by tms79 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
124

Activism/Supporttms79/r/MensRights09/02/25 11:58 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Most guys aren't able to offer what being a traditional man. That's what's killing the dating market. Did you also figured out the "why"? There are many factors in place. I am really curious, if you spent any thought about the why men aren't able to offer. This is the most important question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/25 05:50 AM
20

Show her the data for domestic violence. It's a huge meta study that aggregated 1700 reliable peer-reviewed domestic violence studies from the past. Show her the uni-directional domestic violence, which explicitly has 1 perpetrator and 1 victim. You find it at the statistics and facts at-a-glance. If you look at uni-directional only, which is the interesting part: 28.3% equates to 66% female to male violence 13.8% equates to 34% male to female violence Ask her if she still thinks women can do no…
/r/MensRights02/04/25 04:30 AM
3

https://np.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/mbf6wg/oc_despite_being_far_more_selective_women_still/ Apply your math.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 08:28 PM
0

Even if social media is pervasive it's not real life. If you want to believe it or not, it still shapes young and impressionable minds.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:38 AM
-6

I never said they are shaping the vast majority of young women. But it's definitely not a tiny pool of women either since social media is pervasive nowadays. And don't forget, that they influence each other in their social circles as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:28 AM
7

You do understand, that female influencers on tiktok with their millions of upvotes and likes that OP is talking about, can shape easily the mind of a young impressionable women? There is a reason why they are CALLED influencers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 06:11 AM
3

Are you trying to tell me that not getting dates is the reality for all men? Yes, for the majority. And there is data available that backs it up. It also gets highlighted in the second podcast i linked. Imagine being that detached from reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 05:52 AM
3

Does it? Because the complaining is certainly lopsided in one direction, and it ain't toward women. And that is the crux of it, because you think it's unjustified. Watch the goddamm podcast with Erica Komisar i linked (She is an expert on this topic and has to deal with these young men on a daily basis) There is a reason, why you are blue pill, because you do everything in your power to ignore reality. Even the first 30 minutes should tell you a lot about what's happening to young men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 05:47 AM
2

Why do you bring TikTok into this? And what's up with that anecdotal link? Are you trying to tell me that this is the reality for all women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 12:08 AM
2

Even if that was true, why would they need to rewire anything? Why can't they all just compete for the same top men? Because that pool gets every year smaller and smaller, which frustrates both sexes. What do you think happens to 50% of women, who compete for 10% of men? Do you think they get all into a healthy LTR? What grades you had in math in the past? You wanna see, what reality looks like today for boys and young men? https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Lc1HcssQ-ng&list=PLrnxkCXk-UmU2fIShUfX_dGA…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 11:38 PM
3

Gender equality also means that women need to rewire themselves from dating men only across and up since they are now competing with men for the same jobs. AA and DEI fucked the dating market even more up. According to a study, men climbing up the socio-economic ladder, they widen their dating pool tremendously. When women are climbing the ladder, the dating pool shrinks massively because the majority is incapable of dating down.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 10:14 PM
1

Imagine calling that picky? It's straight up delusional. 60% of women interested in only 14% of the male population. And that's only one of many criteria. But we are the shallow sex right?
/r/MensRights30/03/25 05:12 PM
2

I am so kind and give you the headline of the article: Only 15% Of Women Show Interest In 5'8" Men On Dating Apps, According To Survey While over 60% of women are interested in dating men over 6 feet tall, only 15% of women are willing to date a man who is 5'8" or shorter. And remember, that only 14% of the male population are 6 feet and higher.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 02:34 PM
2

That's some interesting framing when women are the selective sex. It's almost like you are ignoring reality on purpose. Did you read the article, that i linked?
/r/MensRights30/03/25 11:32 AM
-1

I personally find SAHM very valuable for society. Not that i am a religious or a traditionalist. I am not progressive either. I stand for classical liberal values. What was once moderate left is prolly in this day and age moderate right. I do think both sexes have their unique struggles, but most of the time, only one sex gets heard and by society supported. I also think that young boys get in this day and age from the get-go demonized for everything, including for being male. This woman nails i…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 09:02 AM
-1

And now you think this is proof? I get constantly misandrist posts of 2X in my feed for years, even by not being a member, which i will be auto-banned for anyway if i join or post there.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 03:50 AM
5

I expect the western + some east asian countries downfall within the next 30 years. I hope the society after the downfall will learn from the mistakes we did in the last 50 and upcoming years.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 03:39 AM
1

More like a monopoly situation.
/r/MensRights30/03/25 03:31 AM
2

The height preference seems to be on point. And i am saying this as a 183 cm guy aka 6". https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/only-15-women-interest-58-men-dating-apps-according-survey
/r/MensRights30/03/25 03:26 AM
3

Oh, you mean like 2X? The difference is that one of them is socially acceptable and has 50x more members.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 03:06 AM
0

Dr. Donald Dutton, an expert in the field of domestic violence with 45 years experience, who was also part of the giant meta study i mentioned in my previous post says, that women are on average only slighty more injured compared to men, when it comes to domestic violence. https://youtu.be/WHcQ_gx5bbk?si=BDGgbtaYsTQrQI0x He talks about injuries at minute 3:10. But i give you the point, that women are more affected by severe injuries. But those are the exceptions, when it comes to domestic violen…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 02:36 PM
-2

I’ll answer with a question - is domestic abuse against men against the laws? I answer your question with a question. Do you think it is discriminatory, if the gender, that does the majority of uni-directional domestic abuse receives the majority of support through government funded support networks like women's shelters? This is the biggest meta study ever created, that aggregated the data of the most reliable 1700 peer-reviewed domestic violence studies from the last decades. 42 scholars, 70 r…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:50 AM
2

I always wondered, how men physically look, if they take this kind of stance regarding ex prostitutes or prostitutes, that you are taking. Yes, i am deliberately using the word prostitute, because "sex worker" is this new age euphemism as the good old George Carlin would say, if he would be still alive. I consider doing sexual content on Onlyfans also as prostitution, it's just the modern version of it. This may sound a bit shallow, but do you consider yourself being physically attractive to the…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 08:09 AM
4

Jesus, how many more exceptions you wanna list? And some of the things you listed are not exclusively done by one gender.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 05:57 AM
6

Imaging the situation would be reversed and men would be flooded on dating apps with female attention and the occasional pussy pic, while women are starving for attention. What a nightmare scenario i am painting here for men.
/r/MensRights28/03/25 05:33 AM

You are missing, that it is the same small pool of men, who are rotating the women, because of the options they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 04:01 AM

But you will die on average earlier without physical and emotional connection.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:52 AM
0

Speaking from a position of privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 03:34 AM
1

We as a society have set up the system to give women the incentives to behave like that. Just look at the family courts. A man knows exactly what will happen to him financially and his children, if he initiates the divorce, or if his wife pulls the trigger. There is a reason, why the suicide rate for men is roughly 10 fold when he goes through a divorce. I think, this is one of the biggest reasons, why men are willing to endure in bad and/or sexless marriages more often than women, which is pret…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/25 03:27 AM

Don't play dumb. You know exactly what i meant with the other way around. Where is the barrier removal for men with female dominated fields like psychology or medicine for example? Where are the incentives like school events, scholarships and affirmative action for men for these fields? Everyone with common sense can see the hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:06 AM

You mean evening things out how? Women getting pushed into certain male dominated jobs (of course not the dirty ones), but not the other way around. That's some nice concept of equality you have.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 02:43 AM
2

So why pushing women into high paying 'male dominated' jobs like computer science then? If you look at the Scandinavian paradox (women with the biggest freedom of choice, choose even more female dominated jobs than in less egalitarian countries, which completely shocked the sociological scientists). So it's ok to push women into certain 'male' jobs but its not ok to push men into 'female' jobs? https://www.apa.org/gradpsych/2011/01/cover-men And i disagree with psychology being a 'female' job. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 10:44 AM
0

Great answer. I agree with the majority of your takes. Why do you think, men don't receive the same energy and support, when it comes to female dominated fields like psychology for example (90%+ female dominated nowadays, wasn't always this extreme). Looks to me like a huge double standard in society. https://np.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/comments/180geqh/the_field_of_psychology_has_become_totally/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 07:31 AM
1

Yes, you might right on current dating apps, but i am talking about the majority of women, who are on purpose not participating in the hookup culture and avoiding the current apps like the plague.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 06:35 AM
6

Trust me. The governments WILL notice it in the next decades. It's just a question of when they are going to act upon that. Usually, like with everything, when it's already too late. The demographics will shift soon towards lots of old people with very few young people, who were always the backbone of society. A society without it's backbone, you can guess what's going to happen in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:16 PM
1

Just throw a lawsuit at a billion dollar company is your solution? You understand that the predatory algorithms, who everyone with a working brain know they are using, are not open source?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 12:09 PM
8

I mentioned this already before. We need at some point the governments to step in (like in Japan), to compete with the "Matchgroup" dating apps, who are holding currently the monopoly in the online dating market. Governments need to finance and create apps with tax money, that are not build on predatory algorithms to extract as much money as possible from men. Apps with the goal of building a human connection and finding a partner for long term relationships. It should be also not possible, to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 11:05 AM
10

Well said. I see this stupid one-sided argument all the time. Like someone is trying hard to dodge accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/25 07:54 AM
4

You forgot to mention, that modern women also offer the least in this day and age since human existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 06:28 PM

Yeah, it's because of their opposite strong inner group bias. Since human existence, they had to socialise with each other to survive. That's why the bond is so strong between women and they can connect so easily just through talking with each other. Men were busy hunting and gathering resources. That's why men bond to this day the easiest through activities and hobbies. https://www.apa.org/monitor/dec04/women Women are nearly five times more likely to show an automatic preference for their own …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 01:09 PM

It all depends on your mating value in the dating market. If you are a baby, your value is not existent. You can see it as the value you have for companies in the job market. The vast majority of elderly are prolly not competing anymore and are out of the rat race, unless they have an insane amount of resources. Then they can compete with younger men for attractive women. Anna Nicole Smith's husband comes to mind as an example. But those are more exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 10:12 AM

Of course women are also competing with each other. FOR the pool of men, that won the genetic lottery and/or with high social status and/or climbed to the top by beating their competition for resources. It's just on a different level. Women competing with each other for the reasons, that men have for mating high on their priority list. Appearance for example. Why do you think that the Kardashians build over time a multi billion empire with cosmetics? The revenue of the cosmetics industry is roug…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 09:55 AM

Yes, cooperation is happening on an individual level like for activities, hobbies and to an extent in companies, but not on a collective level like for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 04:29 AM

When I was in college, I was a research assistant for a professor who was identifying problems in early childhood education for boys, and how to reduce biases and increase their engagement in school, since that was the largest predictor of later drop-out rates. That professor was a woman. Most of her research assistants were female students. It's nice that some women recognise the bias boys face in the education system, that is tailored to girls. The big question is, will there be any change in …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 02:42 AM
4

It's still a correct statement, with no animosity towards women.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 02:05 AM
6

I would not even use the protection argument. If all men disappear tomorrow, society would crumble and go to shit within weeks. It's not the other way around.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/03/25 02:02 AM

You forgot the main reason. We compete with each other, and women select the winners. That's why men have a weak inner group bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 01:28 AM

Such a good take. I think at some point the governments have to step in (like Japan) and compete with the "Matchgroup" apps in a much healthier way, where no predatory algorithms drain the time and money of men, and where women do not swim in an ocean of options, to pick only the top of the top to get dumped afterwards. An app where LTR's are the main goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/25 04:02 PM
2

Why entertaining this stupid hypothetical, when it is never going to happen? And since it's never going to happen, you will never be able to know if you are right or not. I say the majority of average dudes would be just happy to stay together with one average woman. But average women are not interested in average dudes on dating apps. The data is pretty clear on that.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 09:08 PM
3

This behaviour is so disgusting. It's almost 100% guaranteed, that multiple of the 60 male freshers are performing better than at least half of the female freshers. You don't see the same energy in other fields like psychology, that are heavily female dominated. The double standard is so insane. It's just about lifting women up on the expense of men. And then everyone is asking, why we have no economically suitable men in the dating market 🙄
/r/MensRights12/03/25 10:21 AM
18

One day, I came across a study that showed submitting classwork with a female name yielded a higher grade than classwork with a male name. I initially doubted it, but the methodology was rock solid. Do you mind linking me the study? I am really interested in reading it. I also would love to read the paper you mentioned, that your professor hated. But that would unfortunately expose you here.
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:49 AM
4

FYP: A small pool of men with options are sluttier than women. There you go.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 01:51 AM
1

How many of the women in this day and age in the western world have actually the mindset of a traditional housewife? What men want and what men get are two different things. And why are you jumping already a few steps ahead? We are talking about dating, specifically the first date and you are already talking about marriage. The majority of men AND women are both part of the workforce now. Young women are outearning young men nowadays in many areas, because they make the majority of college degre…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 09:48 PM
2

DEI ensures that only qualified individuals are hired for the job and that among those qualified people there has to be diversity. This female CEO talking about women in the industry must be highly delusional. /s https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yzmQVejR6a8&pp=ygUYZmVtYWxlIGNlbyBndXJscyBpbiB0ZWNo
/r/MensRights09/03/25 05:06 AM
9

Everything boils down to "men bad, women good".
/r/MensRights09/03/25 04:52 AM
13

I smell projection. Male bonding happens mainly through hobbies and activities.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 03:43 AM
9

It was never about equality. Read, what Mallory Millet had to say about her famous feminist sister Kate Millet, who wrote Sexual Politics, the book, that many feminists view as the bible for feminism. It was destructive already in the 70s. The scary part is, everything that was screamed on those "Mao" meetings is today pretty much reality now. https://www.frontpagemag.com/marxist-feminisms-ruined-lives-mallory-millett/
/r/MensRights09/03/25 03:24 AM
3

Could you list a few? As a European, i am really interested in the misandrist Indian laws.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/25 03:11 AM
2

Oh wait, anecdotal evidence again? What do you think, that lately released giant meta study, that i linked, that aggregated the data of 1700 peer-reviewed studies regarding domestic violence is based on? Fiction?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 03:07 PM
4

How about you focus on the overwhelming facts and data i presented regarding domestic violence, instead of your anecdotal evidence. Equating men with violent creatures tells me everything i need to know about the brainwashing and indoctrination you received in your echo chambers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 01:55 PM
0

Apparently not more violent inside the home. It's a mythos, that men are more violent in relationships. I present you the biggest meta study regarding domestic violence ever created by 42 scholars with 70 research assistants at 20 universities. They selected the most reliable 1700 peer-reviewed studies out of 12000 from the last decades and it took 2 years to finish the meta study. Here are the facts summarized at glance. https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistic…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 11:40 AM

Nothing. Male brain delusion. They are dumb and stupid for having that broken chromosome lol Can't accept that they are the monsters of this world The irony is, your answer makes a great example for relational aggression.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 09:46 AM
1

https://globalnews.ca/news/4411507/women-workplace-bullying/ "These socially aggressive behaviours include gossiping, social exclusion, social isolation, social alienation, talking about someone." This pretty much sums it up from the study. Relational aggression is basically every aggression beside physical.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 09:42 AM
1

"These socially aggressive behaviours include gossiping, social exclusion, social isolation, social alienation, talking about someone, and stealing friends or romantic partners.” Water is wet. I mean it's well known, that women are responsible for the majority of relational violence and men for the majority of physical violence.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/25 06:03 AM
0

There is lots of lumping in all men together with your "statements". You should try more often "small pool of men". You make yourself, with all that generalizing look like a misandrist as well, aka part of the problem. No other sex hates men more than men. Do you have any proof for that? I mean it's clear, that we have a 4,5 weaker inner group bias compared to women, but trust me, there are in this day and age plenty of indoctrinated women, who hate men, because a small pool of men do the vast m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 05:40 AM
1

That's actually a good take. I wish actually in this day and age more women would adopt this mindset and not lose their mind when offered 50/50.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/25 09:44 AM
3

Why do i need to answer "water is wet" questions? Men love variety, WHEN they have the options. Also the small pool of men, who receive the majority of the attention have learned, that they don't need to put in any effort, to get intimacy. Women are literally throwing themselves at them. Ever wondered, why rock stars in the past were promiscuous as fuck, who had intimacy with like 3 to 4 digits of women? The hot men on dating apps are basically the new rock stars in this day and age, because wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 09:31 AM
4

Fixed your title: Small pool of men (that receive the majority of the attention) use deception, not straightforward lies, to maintain casual sexual relationships. Deception is just as harmful as lying. The majority of the rest is invisible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 01:49 AM
4

Is there anything wrong as a director like Spielberg, to make mostly male-focused movies?
/r/MensRights05/03/25 06:35 AM
1

If women would be put down from a young age by hammering 24/7 toxic feminity into them, they would not perform, as they are doing today. Plus the education system is tailored towards female characteristics. And do not forget the studies that show, how boys get in classes for the same performance worse grades than the girls, since there is clearly a bias towards girls from the female feminist teachers. But yeah. Women are better... There are 2 words for this, they should use more often. Female Su…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/03/25 06:17 AM
1

What rights? And what made the coal mine worker, who was a cog in the machine, who likely died at 50 from a coal miner's lung exactly the oppressor?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 09:56 AM
-1

That's quite a warped view. I help you with a glimpse of reality. If you think women were drinking more alcohol in the 50s, then you have clearly no clue what's going on in the modern age. https://www.nbcnews.com/health/womens-health/women-us-are-drinking-death-research-finds-rcna96848
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 06:39 AM
0

Let me guess. The husband, who worked 10 hours straight in the coal mine or factory, who supported with every single dollar his family was the oppressor, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 06:31 AM
15

Since human existence only 40% of men reproduced compared to 80% women, which means 60% of all historically born men were genetic dead ends. Since the introduction of Christian monogramy, it's not that brutal for men anymore. I heard once, that since 1950, the men reached a reproduction rate of roughly 60%. You see the same pattern in the animal kingdom as well. Certain monkey species have only a 30% reproduction rate by males. And it's always the most dominant males, that reproduce. Does anyone…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/25 10:29 PM
4

The interesting part is, i am actually on your side with not treating women as commodities on the dating apps.The reason why i have never used a dating app in my life, because i understand the dehumanising part and predatory part (by the companies) of it. And FYI, you can make the same argument for women treating men as commodies by focusing only on shallow and superficial traits. For women on dating apps, it's like a shopping spree in the supermarket.The interaction on those apps forces both si…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 07:57 AM
6

It seems like you are not understanding the part, were the majority of men are forced to do it, to get any action at all. Imagine you are the starving average guy trying to catch a fish in a pond with a 5x5 cm fish net (low amount of daily right swipes) and you are competing with another average starving guy that casts a 3x3 meter fish net (high amount of daily right swipes). Who do you think is starving to death out of those 2 guys?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 07:05 AM
5

If you think about it a little bit deeper, you understand the problem of the situation. If you are not a super attractive dude, you are basically the average guy seeking in the desert for water. It's unfortunately the only strategy, that works for the average guy, since women are extremely picky. The only data on swiping behaviour we have is the one, that shows women are filtering out on average 95% of guys and still have an insane match rate of 36%. Men filter out on average only 47% of women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/25 06:37 AM
1

You are right. You just wanted me to mention it. The why seems to be not that important, right lol?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 06:40 PM
1

And you wanted to know more about WHY we have absent fathers. Clicking the blue links and reading the text helps getting an answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 05:07 PM
0

Why do you think men's suicide rate spikes 11 fold after getting into a divorce? You have clearly no clue of the reality, when it comes to family courts. Everyone with common sense understands, how biased it is against men. Happy reading. Sources are at the bottom. https://medium.com/the-disadvantaged-gap/the-disadvantaged-gap-1a5a7435be41 https://medium.com/the-disadvantaged-gap/the-disadvantaged-gap-1f9b9c9d443b
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 04:50 PM
1

I always find it fascinating, that no scholar actually links the pay gap with the dating market and the reproduction rate of the sexes. Since the existence of the homo sapiens, women selected men very often for the resources and protection, hence the reason, why only 40% of men and 80% of women reproduced. So we had since the human existence 60% genetic dead ends on the male side. You see, that men have actually a very strong incentive to get to the top of the competence hierarchy, if they don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 04:36 PM
0

I personally think, most men want to be in the life of their kids. Most absent men are involuntarily absent and get destroyed by the family courts, where they have to fight for the kids, while the mothers get per default the right for the kids. Out of my head, i only know the Netherlands, who grands per default 50/50 custody after the divorce. Even i am European, i know, that the US is an absolute shitshow, when it comes to divorces. The average man gets basically emotionally and financially sla…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 04:12 PM
0

But more importantly, the women/mom can be just as important as the father. Women are only more important for nurturing and raising the child until it is 7, after 7 the father plays a more important role, when it comes to inserting good values into the child. Unfortunately in this modern age, society doesn't want the father in the picture anymore. Hence the growing amount of single mothers and the highest amount of disfunctional kids ever raised, that struggle with all kinds of issues and the cy…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 12:26 PM
4

I am gonna say it first. Water is wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 12:13 PM
1

Women’s issues will always be the bottleneck of class issues because we are the ones who birth and raise new workers. I fully disagree. Women's issues are taken seriously at large by western society. I think you have a very biased world view, that is unfortunately not grounded in reality. You see it by the amount of feminist/women's organisations exist that get billions of funding by ngo's and the government's to cast their large safety nets for women, by the amount of women's shelters exist, by…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 11:50 AM
1

men generally desire women more than women desire men. Why do you think it is this way? If i had to answer it, i would think of 2 reasons. Reason number one: We live in the west in the safest/comfortable environment ever build and maintained by multiple generations of men from the last couple centuries. This gives many modern women the choice so stay single, since the modern environment allows her to do it. The nanny state does it's part too. There is to an large extent no provisioning and prote…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 11:15 AM
4

That's why it was so much easier "pre smartphone/dating apps era" to meet a girl, even for an average looking guy. Women had only the available options from their local area and did not have the choice paralysis, that many women have nowadays on dating apps. A woman on apps can easily filter out 95% with the amount of men throwing themselves at them. That's what the data is saying on average. Back then she could not replace/filter out a guy that easily, because of the limited options that were a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/25 09:59 AM
19

I wonder if this shit gets actually moderated. We need to bring back mental asylums for those kind of people.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/25 10:17 AM
3

This is a good reference, to see when the sexes were percentage wise able to vote. The graph is based on the UK. So a good chunk of the male population got only roughly 50 years earlier the right to vote. Before that, it was pretty much the same for the vast majority of both sexes. http://empathygap.uk/?p=271
/r/MensRights28/02/25 10:08 AM
12

Bingo.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 05:23 AM
9

and sometimes with women it felt like everything needed to be a storybook romance So the disney princess brainwashing is a real thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 05:17 AM
15

OP, you have my respect for saying the quiet part out loud in the dating market. Especially saying it in a very clear manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/25 05:08 AM
9

Also a quick google image search for "iq men women" shows the different bell curves for the intelligence between men and women. Men have a much flatter bell curve, which means, men are overrepresented on both extremes, aka we have more stupid men and more geniuses. Makes evolutionary a lot of sense, since only 40% of men have historically reproduced compared to 80% women. Intelligence, adaptivity and good genes play a huge role in the mate selection for women.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/25 09:42 AM
1

This is a bunch of word salad. Who are you, to tell boys and men, that they do not need masculinity? Do you understand, that men's and boys mental health is linked to masculinity? How ignorant and indoctrinated can you be?
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:57 AM
1

we do not need a masculine movement but we do need a pro male movement and masculinity is not important to that. Masculinity is the reason, why you have a comfortable live in this day and age with running water, electricity, roof over your head, an infrastructure that got build and maintained and be able to have a fucking smartphone/pc posting this crap.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 07:01 AM
4

I think it started in the UK and Germany is just copying it now, since the government noticed, that it works.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 06:49 AM
9

Who gets to decide what gets censored? The ministry of truth.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 06:45 AM
1

That's anecdotal evidence. I heard a ton of stories, where men got rejected asking for help. And even sons at a certain age could not enter.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/25 07:05 PM
3

Dr. Donald Dutton is one of my favourite experts on domestic violence. He had lately a great talk with thetinmen on YouTube.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 04:00 PM
8

The now called "health & families" organisation does a yearly report for abuse and murder on children. Early 2000s women were dominating with abuse and murder on children. It was roughly 70/30 women/men for both murder and abuse. But for some weird reason is close to 50/50 nowadays, if you check the latest reports. The shift began roughly around 2010 towards 50/50. Since the rise of single mother's and women spending on average more time with kids, i can't imagine it's almost 50/50 nowadays. It'…
/r/MensRights25/02/25 12:01 AM
3

Everyone knows, that schools cater perfectly to feminine characteristics and with the lack of male teachers and role models, there is no wonder, we see the downfall of boys in the education system. And we all know the studies that show, that female teachers grade girls on average better than boys for the same performance. But Richard Reeves cannot talk about this without making himself a target by a certain movement. All i see is political correctness combined with walking on egg shells.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 11:40 PM
24

I can tell you, who the majority of perpetrators are. Time to unplug your indoctrinated brain. It's a mythos, that men are more violent in relationships. I present you the biggest meta study regarding domestic violence ever created by 42 scholars with 70 research assistants at 20 universities. They selected 1700 peer-reviewed studies from the last decades and it took 2 years to finish the meta study. Here are the facts summarized at glance. https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:58 PM
23

No one gives a shit.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:54 PM
29

Apparently not inside the home. It's a mythos, that men are more violent in relationships. I present you the biggest meta study regarding domestic violence ever created by 42 scholars with 70 research assistants at 20 universities. They selected 1700 peer-reviewed studies from the last decades and it took 2 years to finish the meta study. Here are the facts summarized at glance. https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ Most interesting data is the …
/r/MensRights24/02/25 02:40 PM
4

💯. And that pushes some men to do crimes. If you wanna reproduce as a man, you need to climb the economic ladder the legal or illegal way. It's a must for men, and it's an option for women. Historically since the existence of mankind only 40% men reproduced compared to 80% women. And i heard lately that since the 1950s its rougly 60% men vs 80% women.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 12:19 PM
1

You do know, that there are thousands of women's organisations financed by the government out there being the social and economical safety net for women? There are barely any for men available. To give you a perspective in the US regarding shelters. 2000 available women's shelters vs 2 men's shelters.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 09:06 AM
1

Both sexes care about looks. There was a study where women said they care mainly about personality, but their actions said otherwise (surprise, it was about looks).It's just, that women have a bigger laundry list of requirements for a partner. That's why looks for men stand more out, since our list is on average very small for mating.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 02:45 AM
6

Bingo. Women absorb romance, men perform romance.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 02:37 AM
8

Do i have to mention, that there are ton of normal men between those 2 options?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/25 07:30 AM
3

Apparently not inside the home. It's a mythos, that men are more violent in relationships. I present you the biggest meta study regarding domestic violence ever created by 42 scholars with 70 research assistants at 20 universities. They selected 1700 peer-reviewed studies from the last decades and it took 2 years to finish the meta study. Here are the facts summarized at glance. https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/ Most interesting data is the …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 10:30 PM
15

You mean like 2X have males/men in every single topic?
/r/MensRights18/02/25 07:33 AM
8

The irony, that feminist Cathy Newman is presenting the news.
/r/MensRights17/02/25 10:11 AM

The more interesting question would be: Do we live in this day and age in a gynocentric society?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 06:14 PM
1

When did they link the draft to the vote for men in the US? Here is btw the UK version of it. I think when women say, that men could vote since forever, they are always forgetting, that the majority of the whole population wasn't able to vote. 50 years before women could vote, roughly 50% of men were able to vote in the UK. http://empathygap.uk/?p=271 The working class got the vote basically at the same time as women got it and it was additionally linked to the draft.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/25 08:49 AM
2

Yes, arranged marriages were a thing, but it was for both sides the case. Parents usually did the choosing whether it was for their daughter or son. This still does not negate the fact, that the majority of men were basically a genetic dead end since human existence. I see it my own family as well. I have 5 aunts and 3 uncles. All my aunts reproduced beside one (she is mentally ill and had at a young age a brain tumor) and every single one of my uncles is childless. Yes, its anecdotal, but still…
/r/MensRights16/02/25 03:25 AM
1

I somehow agree with your take, but only in the context of short term mating. For LTR, i say the majority of men do not want women, who dress all the time provocatively, to seek attention and validation from other men. Yes, this pool of liberal women exist and it's not a small one.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 06:10 AM
1

Just out of curiosity. How many men percentage wise were able to vote in the 1800s and pre 1800s, since you mentioned it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 05:25 AM
22

Have you ever thought, that men actually have an incentive, to be at the top in terms of reproduction? You know, that historically only 40% of men reproduced, but 80% women? Wonder, who the women picked in the past. Also not many women want to deal with a 80h week and be in a shark tank. ALSO APEX FALLACY.
/r/MensRights14/02/25 07:24 AM
3

There is a link called DV facts and statistics at-a-glance.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 08:26 AM
4

Yeah, you are right. I just educated myself. The center of the milky way is a massive black hole.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 10:25 PM

I hear the argument all the time. "Nothing is stopping men building them". You have to understand, that everything needs funding. And if society believes at large, that women are the only victims of domestic violence, try to convince the government in getting funding for men's shelters. They laugh at you like they did with Earl Silverman in Canada. He tried to get funding from the Canadian government and got mocked for it by the government and feminist organisations trying to build the first men…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 01:09 PM

If you wanna silence feminists regarding their warped view on domestic violence, just show them this: https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/ A huge meta study out of 1700 peer-reviewed studies from the last decades done by 42 well renowned scholars and 70 research assistants at 20 universities, who worked on this for 2 years. It feels almost like Copernikus telling the church about heliocentrism, that the sun is the center of our galaxy and not the earth. But feminism tries to teach us otherwise …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 11:38 AM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/mbf6wg/oc_despite_being_far_more_selective_women_still/ Do you really think, women on dating apps want and swipe the average guy with an average 5% swipe rate on 100% of the male userbase? The math does not check out. You understand, that top5-10% does not mean average?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 08:40 AM
1

Can you name the concrete books please? I am very interested.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/02/25 03:29 AM

That male friend. Where did he get that number 80% from? Anecdotal evidence? His social circle does not represent all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:26 PM
6

Why is that relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 06:13 PM
5

Support systems comes easy to my mind. NGO's and women's organisations catering to women only. I think you have no idea, how many safety nets you have compared to men in the west. For example there are ~2000 women shelters in the USA and a whole whopping 2 for men. That smells like privilege to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 05:56 PM
12

What do you mean bears are all unemployed? They are all great hunters and fishermen .. ehh, fisherbears.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 08:48 AM

We had in the past fathers, who did this job early on in the dating phase for their daughter. It was called vetting, because women seem to have a hard time spotting those bad traits early on. But they are nowadays a species in danger of extinction.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 08:11 AM

We have a bingo!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 07:58 AM
38

Reason for this is the "Women are wonderful effect" and Gamma bias. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect https://digitalhabitats.global/blogs/sociology/gamma-bias-cognitive-distortion-in-thinking-about-gender-by-martin-seager-john-barry-at-ucl
/r/MensRights31/01/25 11:03 PM

Fully agree with your analysis. Could not have said it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 01:52 AM

Wait, you are telling me, the left did not demonize men in the past and were "only" uplifting women? Are you for real? The education system is completely in control by the left. And afaik they teach in colleges in mandatory feminist courses the patriarchy theory, which in simple words means that men are the oppressors and women are the oppressed (marxism 101). This builds up in women contempt towards men and widens the devide between the two sexes. And this is just a single example of the demoni…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 01:50 AM

Trump catered to men. And it was pretty smart. Not glorifying this guy, just acknowledging that it was a smart move during his campaign by jumping from influencer to podcaster. When you have the left demonizing men for years, if not decades, you should not be surprised, that the manosphere influencers and grifters encourage their audience to vote for Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:10 PM

What i noticed and i believe is also what the majority of MRA's believe, is that neither the republicans nor the democrates help men in general. The only difference between the two is, that the left additionally demonizes men (with their oppressor narrative for example), which was one of the factors, that helped Trump win this election. I am saying this as a European.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 06:53 PM

No, his name is Donald Dutton. He is an expert, when it comes to domestic violence. Not every mentioned Canadian professor means Jordan Peterson. And if you think, lawyers play in divorce battles a fair game, you are just naive. This has nothing to do with TRP. The silver bullet is always on the table when it comes to custody disputes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 09:54 AM

I think it's mainly the biased family court system, that heavily favours women and also the dirty tricks, that lawyer advise women to do, when it comes to divorces, like false allegations for example. I heard, that almost 100% of lawyers advise women to play dirty during the divorce, because they do not have to fear any consequences from it. It's called the "silver bullet" among the lawyers, because it's that effective without having to face any repercussions. A Canadian professor once said, tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 08:26 AM
7

That was the first thing, that popped into my mind, that lesbian couples have the highest DV. But yeah, men to much headache lmao.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/25 08:22 AM
8

Why do you think, if you look at the history of mankind, 40% of men and a whopping 80% of women have reproduced? If you think, there is not some kind of biological selection process going on, you are the one, who is coping.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 06:28 PM
5

Yeah, thats something, that always annoyed me too, that females in animes always get away with violence and emotional outbursts for glancing at her parts. It's almost like the trope with the bumbling idiot dad in sitcoms.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 03:34 PM
5

Can you elaborate on this why animes are very misandrist? This is a genuine question.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/01/25 11:03 AM
5

On average the male testosterone level dropped every year by roughly 1% due to micro plastics and other enviromental reasons, which makes us over time more feminine and less attractive to women, if they are not on birth control. And you are right. There are many instances, where women stopped taking the pill during the relationship and lost all attraction for their partner. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/mens-testosterone-levels-declined-in-last-20-years-idUS…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 03:58 PM
5

I think the pill had a huge impact on this outcome over the last decades. The pill messes with the hormone level of females and it almost imitates the stagnant/stable hormon level of males. Women on the pill are on average more attracted to feminine partners, which also includes women. That would partly explain, why a the pool of bi-sexual women grew rapidly over the last few decades. Dr. Sarah Hill is a good expert on this topic regarding the devastating effects of the pill to the female body. …
/r/MensRights06/01/25 01:18 PM
3

Are you talking about those agreeable modern women, who ethically undo their unborn babies every year?
/r/MensRights06/01/25 01:03 PM

No, i am talking about those, that show how women release significantly more oxytocin during courtship. Never wondered, why way more women catching feelings after accepting and getting into casual situationships based on intimacy? I wonder, why i hear those stories all the time? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6446474/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 10:21 AM
10

Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 07:01 AM

Muh, SCiEncE OvErRAtEd! DO nOt tRuSt tHe StUdIEs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 11:55 PM

Glad it worked for you. Still just the classic anecdotal evidence 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 11:52 PM
-3

Have you ever heard of the hormone called oxytocin?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/24 12:46 AM
-1

Hmm, women with their "5% swipe right" behaviour on dating apps must be all focusing on the unemployed slobs. https://preview.redd.it/u61jcc7xoxq71.jpg?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=61e946a5a8e0b4fafc8a8f5d8e1bb02e73763f04
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/24 09:36 AM
-1

My point is moot? Jesus Christ. Read your first post, that i have responded to. You went into a hypothetical with your brother. And now you are incapable of doing the same to yourself? The reason i did it is, because it seems like you have an issue reflecting your own behaviour with the reputation destruction in case your brother would not protect you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 02:22 PM
-4

It's funny, that in this instance, you are only questioning his behaviour and not yours. I wonder why the RP have the phrase "Accountability is the kryptonite for women". Relational violence is a spectrum of violence and what you are specifically doing is called reputation destruction. The other forms of relational violence are spreading rumors, false allegations, social isolation or parental alienation. Men do it too, but to a much lesser degree since we go the path of the least resistance and …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 01:21 PM
-2

I like your awareness of relational violence in our society. I would say, you are in the minority, who have the ability to see, that it can be equally destructive as physical violence. It is truly a blind spot in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 07:29 AM
-5

This is what we call relational aggression/violence and women have since the existence of mankind mastered it. It is since a long time a blind spot in society and gets barely punished. I hope that changes in the future and gets equally punished as we rightfully punish physical violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 07:13 AM
0

Why marriage in the first place? We all know, that a good chunk of women react allergic to the word prenup and once she knows the man is fully committed to her, dead bedrooms are inevitable over time. And that is only one mentioned downside of marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 08:23 AM
17

Yeah, men swapping notes in the age of the Internet is essential for MGTOW and you necessarily have to talk about female nature and the behaviour of modern women. That's the part, where you likely save many lifes. I fully agree with you. It has be talked about without being misogynistic.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:51 AM
7

"We need to keep the narrative up, that men are the predators and women are the victims ." Your average feminist reddit mod.
/r/MensRights30/11/24 02:30 PM
-1

Can you quote me where i made the assertion in my first post?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:37 AM
-7

Where the fuck did i make the assertion? It was a fucking question. A question you didn't answer in the first place. What a fucking surprise. And if you think 1000 is a small sample size, then you have no clue about statistics. Maybe the study was flawed, this does not change the fact, that a ton of women have male orbiters, waiting to shoot their shot. My last girlfriend was one of those. Who kept multiple men in her "friendzone", that were shooting their shoot later down the road. I also have …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:12 AM
-2

I can tell you, that the vast majority of men do not want their partner to post sexy images for other men on social media, that potentially slide into their dm's. Are there exceptions? 100% like to everything. They are called cucks for a reason. And yes. This is 100% one of my boundaries for a LTR. The equivalent of you putting yourself into a position, where you get attention from men and building potentially a connection (i am not talking about being in the supermarket, and getting accidentall…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:42 AM
-8

What do you think percentage wise of women run a business in general of all women, that are on social media? And i am not talking about the ones, that selling their bodies. Normal businesses. If i had to guess, i would say, it's in the low single digit. I do not have a problem with women promoting their normal businesses on social media. I do have a problem with the whole degeneracy on social media, where other men sliding into their dm's, when they are clearly in a committed relationship. There…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 03:09 AM
-9

Like this is the only scenario in the world, women are using social media, is running a normal business. Let me ask you a simple question. What is more common on Instagram? Women placing their thirst traps for men or running their business? The absolute majority of men are not using social media for their business, because the majority of men have no god damn business. If a woman is in a committed relationship and spreading thirst traps on social media to garner attention from other men, this is…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 01:38 AM
3

This case is not rare. They think the better deal is in it for the LTR and get played. I advise men to never take those women back, when they start crawling back. Have some self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 09:21 AM
4

What's the point in mentioning the perpetrators? Relativize the male victims? By that logic, do you do the same for murdered female childs and babies, where predominantly mothers murder them?
/r/MensRights24/11/24 09:21 AM
3

The reason, why women created their own network "are we dating the same guy" for all the major cities. They inherently all know, that they are dating the same small pool of hyper attractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 06:29 AM
1

I do not trust those huge organisations like the UN and WHO. Their pushing their propaganda. What i do trust is the science in regards to domestic violence. There have been done 1700 studies over the last few decades and it shows clearly, that domestic violence is not a gendered issue. Meta studies actually show, that when it comes to one-directional domestic violence (which is half of the DV), women lead with 70% being the perpetrator)
/r/MensRights21/11/24 08:20 PM

Bingo.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 07:32 PM
6

I find it always fascinating, when the "women could not vote" gets mentioned. It's like implying, that men were able to vote since forever. Did you know, that 50 years, before the majority of women got the right to vote, that the vast majority of men were not able to vote as well? And when men got the right to vote, that it is to this day coupled to the responsibility, to fight in wars? http://empathygap.uk/?p=271
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/24 07:58 AM
36

Not only anti-male but also anti-free speech. I remembering watching a Scandinavian professor mentioning it in a documentary, and i wholeheartedly agree with him. You can see it in the UK right now, where the government equates misogyny with terrorism, but not the other way around.
/r/MensRights16/11/24 08:38 PM
62

Since a long time South Korea is one of the best connected countries, when it comes to the Internet. Now i understand, when people say, that radical feminism in South Korea is on steroids compared to other countries. It's like an infected hive-mind with those brainwashed Korean woman being terminally online in their echo-chambers and spreading hate towards men.
/r/MensRights15/11/24 06:49 AM
6

I only watched one episode of his show, where Sam Seder and a woman were belittling a MRA guy, who had a hard time presenting good arguments regarding men's issues. He is just a douche, who thinks men's issues are not relevant, because men are "privileged" in society.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 09:22 AM
5

I advise you to watch some stuff from thetinmen. He is known for his compact slides regarding men's issues on Instagram. He made lately a YouTube channel with a couple interesting interview partners like Dr. Donald Dutton for example. A psychology professor, who dedicated 45 years of his life in the field of domestic violence. He is revealing, that feminist organisations painting a completely different picture regarding domestic violence (mainly for profit, since it's a zero-sum game), which is …
/r/MensRights14/11/24 09:03 AM

https://youtu.be/hx5x0Ztffm4?si=a4AWHokJV6aqmNFj
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 09:42 AM

Dr. Warren Farrell is prolly the best example. Lots of videos online showing the harpies screaming at men, who are trying to enter.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/24 09:33 AM

Yeah, she is the best representative for the 24% of women, who are taking SSRI's in the US. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1391260/us-adults-currently-have-or-being-treated-for-depression-by-gender/
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 05:35 AM
44

The left reap what they sow by demonizing and hating men for the last years, especially if you are white straight man. I put the majority of the blame on the left for increasing the divide in the culture war.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:11 PM
4

I mean the results were pretty much obvious after decades of misandry and the demonization of boys and men.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:34 PM
7

What's up with this obsession for abortion laws in the US? Afaik it went with Roe v Wade back to the states and from what i heard, we have here in Europe in almost every single country much stricter abortion laws compared to the US. Do you see any women in Europe crying about abortion laws? For some reason this is only a thing in the US with laws, that are much more lenient.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:31 PM
3

Are they really surprised with the election results with decades of misandry and demonization of men and boys by the left? It's called karma. And i am saying this as an European.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 01:18 PM
1

tl:dr: Gamma Bias
/r/MensRights31/10/24 01:03 PM
1

You are making my point tho. Women wanna make themselves seen more as the victim and ignoring all the brutal violence, that men receive. Prolly because the perpetrators are almost exclusively men. And there goes usually the empathy for male victims out of the window. Depending on the country it's usually 2:1 up to 3:1. I mean there is a reason why there exists the gamma bias, where men's privileges are always in the spotlight, but women's privileges not so much and vice versa with disadvantages.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 09:24 AM
1

I always have to giggle, when i read "women wanna feel safe at night", when the majority of violent crime victims are men (it's not even close). You can clearly see the disposability of men shining through with this conditioned mentality. In the last German election we had a debate on TV between the 3 candidates and 2 of them did mention, that we need to improve the safety of women at night, just to cater to the female voters. Everyone is blatantly ignoring the statistics. Catering to feelings h…
/r/MensRights30/10/24 04:56 AM
0

Let me ask you a question. If a woman is making substantially more money than the man, should he still pay on the date? I am in general not a big fan of dinner dates, since it's getting more and more of a problem, that men get exploited for their hard earned money by this trend of foodie calls. Men leading with the wallet opens the door for exploitation. The main focus of first dates should be getting to know each other. Checking out, if there is chemistry between each other. I am not saying, yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 04:40 AM
3

Ok, Jedi master. Tell us the real meaning behind it.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 03:49 AM
1

Correct. Not sure, why it is relevant to my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 08:34 PM
-2

Courtship is one example. Most women still expect the man to pay for dates in this day and age. A good chunk of women see it as very unattractive, when the man goes 50/50 on the first date and this is very often the deal breaker for a second date. We are at a point in time, where women under 30 outearn men in major cities in the US and we still expect the man to pay fully for dates. Don't get me into foodie calls, where in a survey 23% of women admitted, that they dated men for the sole reason o…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 06:38 PM
-11

The issue is, when modern women demand traditional treatment from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 03:54 PM
9

"What is your age?"
/r/MensRights22/10/24 06:58 AM
-1

The thing is, i don't see it as sexist. Saying male or female is for me not derogatory. It's that easy. If you see it that way, it's your problem. But i know it's a talking point in your bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 03:48 PM
0

So you look at one instance and made the conclusion of your movement's talking point? I said look at my comments history (just from this week) and you see, that i use the word women as much as the word men or male.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 09:51 AM
0

You are making that up in your mind. I see women as equal, i just have an issue with the supremacy movement, that is destroying the west. I use all 4 words (men, women, male, female) fairly equal if you look at my history. Ridiculous, how people upvote this.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/24 04:38 AM
4

That's exactly what Kate Millett was deliberately doing in the late 60s. Meeting up with high ranked marxist feminists and having these cult-like events like Mao had in his prime. Her sister is a little treasure, when it comes to exposing her radical sister laying the first bricks for destroying the west. The book "Sexual Politics" from Kate Millett gets treated as the bible under radical feminists. https://mensrights.com.au/feminism/marxist-feminisms-ruined-lives-mallory-millett-1sept-2014
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:53 AM
2

What is bootstrap-ism? I am not native-english.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 03:19 AM
-6

"Better" is the wrong word. Men work longer hours and harder on average and there are other factors. Also men have an incentive to work longer and harder because of female selection. The higher you climb up the socio-economic ladder, the higher is the probability, that you get selected to reproduce. It's not the same for females.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 11:56 AM
1

Get your facts straight. It's ~40% of men and ~80% of women, who historically have reproduced. More men are committing harakiri for different reasons. One of the reasons are, that men build women a world with cushy office jobs, where women made themselves independent from men. A world, where every single problem can be solved with money. Women can nowadays survive on their own with just a cushy office job, where men build and maintain the infrastructure around her. If a woman abandoned her husba…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 10:26 AM
38

There is a famous quote from Carl Gustav Jung: Men's biggest vice is lust, while women's biggest vice is envy/jealousy. There is some truth in that.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 06:49 AM
1

Solispism at it's finest. What does it have to do with anything, that reddit was build in the USA? Like wtf? And i hate to burst you bubble, but the majority of reddit users are not US citizens. USA have the biggest share of all countries, but they are not the majority. Not everything revolves around the USA and you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 03:47 PM
3

Gotcha, by brain was a bit off. I was misreading it. I fully agree with you there.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 06:30 AM
1

Because the USA is the only country in the world with drafts, right? And we have currently also no wars going on, right? Have you seen those videos on reddit lately, where 10 Ukrainian men drag one Ukrainian guy into a van, who refuses of getting drafted? Let's apply your flawless logic to yourself. Since a lot of women got the rights to vote at 1918 and since the majority of women, that are alive today, are born after 1918, you should be not complaining anymore, that we had women in the past, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/24 06:23 AM
-2

And? It's like telling me, that nowadays 80-85% of psychologists are female. Where is the problem?
/r/MensRights14/10/24 11:11 PM
56

Like the progressive thinking of the UN, that celebrates 8 days the "International Womens Day" and zero days the "International Men's Day"? Is that the equality you are talking about?
/r/MensRights14/10/24 07:07 AM
32

How about she should restrain herself in the first place by not punching a man in the face?
/r/MensRights13/10/24 07:32 PM
2

You give lots of new info out for being that paranoid. I just wanted validity for the claim you made regarding the pedo, which is as i said, hard to believe. I usually prefer it, when people actually back up their claims, since it could come straight from their butt.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/24 06:12 AM
2

It relates to your argument, since you said men injure more likely women, which is not true since the bellcurves almost overlap identical, when it comes to injuries. Women getting murdered are the exception in domestic violence cases. In those exceptional cases after a heavy conflict, the man usually kills himself or the partner. Not saying this is a good thing. But what you should ask yourself. If the science clearly shows from roughly 1700 studies over the last few decades, that women are in o…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 04:42 PM
6

It's not my argument, i am stating data from meta studies about domestic violence. The common domestic violence case is not a fist fight by the way. It's not uncommon, that women use objects, to hurt their partner. If you overlap the bellcurves, when it comes to injuries, women get only slightly more injured compared to men. The data regarding injuries get mentioned in this video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WHcQ_gx5bbk&pp=ygUNZG9uYWxkIGR1dHRvbg%3D%3D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 03:31 PM
6

I hate to burst your bubble, but when it comes to injuries from domestic violence, women are on average only slightly more injured than men according to a ton of studies. When it comes to one-directional domestic violence, women are roughly 70% the abuser and men the victim. One-directional DV makes roughly 50% of all DV. If you wanna educate yourself on the topic, i highly recommend watching this talk with Professor Dr. Donald Dutton. It might trigger a bit, because the scientific evidence does…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 10:48 AM
1

That must have been in the local town newspapers/websites, right? Do you mind linking it here? This is extremely hard to believe. And do you also have evidence for your claim, that a lot of men get a slap on the wrist, or never see the court room after raping kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 10:29 AM
6

The dating app data we have gotten in the past tells a big story, how men and women behave and how picky women truly are in the online dating market. Why do you think, the match group, who owns the majority of the dating apps, hides the statistics like the coca cola recipe from the masses? Replace the word neurotic with realistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 06:29 AM
4

I wouldn't call it revenge. More like protecting the sanity and resources of the average man from unstable women, who are unable to bond because of their promiscuous past with Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 05:52 AM
7

And don't forget, that feminists often call women a "pick-me" as a shaming tactic, to dismiss their usual more reflected world view, since it does not fit their feminist narrative and their indoctrinated sisterhood hive-mind. You can be empathetic to the set of problems of both genders. The usual marching feminist does not care for the issues of men. They get dismissed and the men get belittled since they are all "privileged". That's for me the biggest reason, why the movement is not for equalit…
/r/MensRights11/10/24 03:37 AM
9

After your question regarding the 17 year old boy and 19 year old girl, you should have switched straight up to female teachers and underaged boys, how he views that scenario with lets say a 37 year old teacher and a 13 year old boy. I mean, if you look at the history of this sub, it is a very common appearance, especially by the sheer amount of female teachers exist in the education system.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 06:30 AM
6

I am glad, you had a talk with Dr. Donald Dutton. He is my favorite expert, when it comes to domestic violence. He is really underrated and his talks on YouTube were really eye-opening.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 06:21 AM
7

Water is wet.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 06:20 AM
2

Let me guess. Spreading propaganda, being sexist and misandrist on feminist subs is fine, because they are the "oppressed" gender?
/r/MensRights08/10/24 06:01 AM
48

Ahh, she must be talking about earth 2.
/r/MensRights05/10/24 02:38 AM
2

Not just the legal system. It infested basically every institution, that has some sort of power. From academia to governments, ngo's and the legal system.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/09/24 06:22 AM
56

There was a korean woman, who did some researching and asked korean people on the streets regarding "4b" and came to the conclusion, that the vast majority of korean people do not know the "4b movement". Her name is Anna, and she made 2 videos about the 4b movement and the low birth rate on YouTube. It's just a bunch of loud rad feminists trying to push an agenda. There is no real correlation between "4b" and the low birthrate in SK. It's really worth a watch, shows the true agenda behind those …
/r/MensRights24/09/24 04:03 PM
2

This should still not justify 7 times the funding difference. Btw, more men are dying from prostate cancer than women from breast cancer.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 10:31 PM
7

The fucking irony, that she is a domestic abuse charity worker. This reminds me, that men need more shelters.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 11:39 PM
14

Are you at least consistent with your morality, when all those female teachers lately, who are much older than the boys, are raping them?
/r/MensRights13/09/24 10:57 AM
4

You guys are forgetting one of the biggest factors. It's money. Erin Pizzey mentioned it in her books. It's a billion dollar industry and those women's organisations wanna keep their monopoly position since it's a zero-sum game. NGO's and governments can only donate a finite amount of money. Thats why a shitton of women's organisations fought a few months ago in Italy heavily against the activists, that tried to bring awareness to male victims of domestic violence. According to Erin Pizzey, a go…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 06:08 AM
10

Yeah, keep ignoring reality. The suicide rate goes up by the factor 11 for men during a divorce for example. It is not rare, that children gets used as pawns to allienate the father or women use false allegations during the divorce to strengthen her position. Almost all the lawyers advise this in a divorce battle, because women have no consequences to fear. It's called the silver bullet among divorce lawyers. And i am not saying women are responsible for all suicides, but certainly for a fractio…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 05:55 AM
2

Most of the one-directional domestic violence comes from women towards men. There are 1700 studies made on domestic violence in the last decades, where aggregated data shows this. But feminists are blatantly choosing to ignore it, because it does not fit their narrative. There is a ton of money at stake , that these women's organisations yearly receive. Former feminist Erin Pizzey talks about this all the time. She created actually the first female shelter in the 70s in the UK. Also highest rate…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 05:34 AM
9

Women use covert methods like relational violence to kill men. False allegations, reputation destruction or parental alienation to drive men into suicide. A large chunk of male suicides come from relationship problems/conflicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 05:15 AM
13

This is also the reason why politicians cater more towards women regarding women's issues. Women have the strong inner group bias, men have the strong outer group bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 05:10 AM
22

Let's be honest here. Both sexes can be very shallow. If you look at the dating app data, you can clearly see, that women swipe on average to the right only about 5% of the time. Ignoring on average basically 95% of the men. Meanwhile men swipe roughly 50% of the time to the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 05:02 AM
9

Women's weapon of choice is relational violence . Can be even more harmful, than physical violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 04:51 AM
8

I wonder why? Is it maybe because men are straight up more direct? They did years ago study on twitter and the conclusion was that most of the hateful messages towards women came from other women regarding behaviour and looks. It was above 60%. If you think women are those angelic creatures, think again.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/24 04:45 AM
1

If women’s pussies actually had the “equal power” to the power men naturally had than you claim, then it would not be possible for women to be so systematically treated like shit Explain to me, how all those OF models make their money? Do you think its their charisma and personality, that makes them the money? You are arguing completely in bad faith and do not acknowlege clearly certain female advantages in dating and gender dynamics. And where the heck do women get systematically treated like s…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 09:45 PM
1

Sex as a “power” has been heavily shamed and punished for a very very long time, and still is. It is true, that women getting shamed for being promiscious, but so do men if they are virgins. Women are getting called sluts, whores and hoes, men get called virgins, losers and incels. Things, that are easy in life, are never gonna be respected by society. A large pool of women in the western world can have sex techincally multiple times a day. It's not a big archivement. It's quite a big challenge …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 09:45 PM
2

Only because a pool of men use derogatory phrases for sex does not make me underestimate feminine sexual power in gender dynamics. You can easily see the power played out on dating apps. What portion of men and what portion of women get attention on dating apps? What sex is making the majority of money with OF content? We have here in germany a crazy housing shortage situation, where ukrainian women, who fled from the war, are offering their bodies to landlords, to get the handshake for a flat/a…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 02:47 PM
3

You think 40/60, with the tendency of getting worse in the future a "slight imbalance"? Really? A slight imbalance is for me 48/52. The thing is, back in the past, the goverment implemented rightfully measures with title IX, to correct the imbalance. Now its completely flipped and the big question i am asking right now is: Do you see the goverment or NGO's putting any measures in place, to counter the imbalance like the goverment did back in the 70s with title IX?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 12:57 PM
2

I see it as the sex, that is more desperate for intimacy, has less power in those dynamics. You can now try to figure out, which one of the sexes is more desperate and has more urges for intimacy. Basically one sex is dangling the carrot over the other sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 10:43 AM
4

This might be a hot take, but i think we live in an era, where we are heading for societal collapse. I think women had always social and sexual power over men, men had economic power over women and it was kinda balanced out. The economic power men had/have, was very often the hard work/hours men put in, to reach the top, because they inherently knew, that high economic power means a very high success rate, when it comes to the sexual selection by the females. So if men wanted to be successful in…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 09:36 AM
1

Can you actually elaborate? What makes you happy specifically? Being a blue pill beta male? Stop being so goddamn vague.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 04:38 AM

Not to be disrespectful, but i have a hard time understanding your wordsalad. Saying, that men's dreamlife is having no responsibility to help anyone cracked me up. Your generalisations are mind-boggling. You went down really hard the radical feminist rabbithole.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/24 12:47 AM

Are you living on planet earth 2? Your "facts" look very onesided. I guess i can't blame you, since you got a feminist tag. First of all, it's both sexes, who are actually not commiting (for different reasons) to LTR in this day and age. Ever heard of MGTOW? Try to understand from a males perspective, why they are not commiting OR even engaging in dating anymore. The dating apps/platforms have a huge issue right now, since their primary source of income (men) are leaving en masse those apps. Che…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 10:00 AM
2

I think the question should more be: Do you have any evidence or data, that supports the claim, that the majority of men are these unhinged monsters, that treat all women like garbage? I am actually the one, who has the nuanced and realistic stance here and acknowledge, that on both sides is an equal amount of shitty people, and those are far from being the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/24 08:34 PM
7

I guess you are describing the small pool of men, that got all the options. That a good chunk of those men treat women poorly is a big shocker. Who would have thought that? The majority of men in the dating pool are invisible to women. That's why sites like "Are we dating the same guy?" exist. Yeah, and like others already mentioned. Please stay single.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/24 03:15 PM
-1

It's undeniable, that he is a positive influence for many men in the world, it's just not for you the case. He aligns not with your political values if i had to guess. I am not agreeing with everything he says, but a good chunk of it, especially when it comes to feminism and wokeness/political correctness.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 02:39 PM
10

The majority of the damage did the Kardashians. They basically paved the way for the millions of female "infuencers".
/r/MensRights27/08/24 06:54 AM
22

It was social media first (biggest impact had Instagram), when women started comparing themselves with those fake plastic women, that live the "luxurious lifestyle". Everyone started to envy the looks and lifestyle of those fake photoshoped women and raised their now unrealistic standards on dating apps in order to get closer to that lifestyle. That's why plastic surgery, depression and the cosmetic industry skyrocketed.
/r/MensRights27/08/24 05:19 AM
3

Exactly. Feminists love to talk about femicides. But i think more men and boys are killing themselves in response to the actions of their girlfriend/wife, like from parental alienation, from false allegations in a divorce battle or simply from getting cheated on. Lots of men can't deal with that betrayal or relational violence and resort to extreme measures. I was checking once the data for femicides and suicides per year in the UK and the suicides are basically 50x compared to the femicides. So…
/r/MensRights20/08/24 03:08 PM
2

You guys are forgetting sex as a weapon/tool, since men's biggest weakness is lust.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 03:23 AM
25

Pro accountability. I am more leaning to pro life. Abortions should be allowed but very rare. But this is not what's happening in our society.
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:43 PM
15

Both sides are bad i am fairly neutral to this since i am European and have lots of empathy for my fellow american men. Democrates hammering on men for having supposedly more privileges. Republicans hammering on men for enforcing more responsibility.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 04:31 AM

Do you have any data, to back that claim up? Afaik, there exist data, that 70-80% divorce initiation is done by women and 90% if higher educated.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/24 05:59 AM
3

Not to mention that women are being the majority of perpetrators in domestic violence according to scientific data collected over the last few decades. A certain movement is telling us a different story. Should men be more cautious? Good point btw. Edit: I guess i have to back my claim up, since i am getting downvoted. https://www.instagram.com/p/C0_eDzltMJz/?img_index=1 I actually read one of the big meta studies from the year 2014. Not a good look on women, when it comes to one-directional dom…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/24 04:15 PM
1

I think you are unable to comprehend fully his argument. Get away from this elite men wording. Think more of a pool of men, who have a good amount resources OR are genetically blessed OR having both. And now look up the data, that got released by the dating app/platforms regarding the swiping behaviour from women and you can make a connection. It's not that hard. Saying 99.9% have never been pursued by elite men is dishonest.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 06:08 AM
3

It's very simple. Women's inner group bias is as strong as men's outer group bias towards women. Men's inner group bias is as weak as women's outer group bias towards men.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:50 AM

I don't like to repeat myself. The reason why Chad uses also mids for sexual interactions is, because they are so much easier to have sex with. Less hoops to jump through. In this day and age, most of the dating today is happening through dating apps. Cold approaching on the streets is a dying breed.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 03:52 AM
3

"Unwanted Sexual Contact". This reminds of George Carlin, when he was talking about euphemisms.
/r/MensRights27/06/24 03:38 AM

Don't play dumb. Chad is just a term for the very good looking dudes, who are getting on dating apps most of the action, since personality is barely a factor on those apps. Instead of Chad, i could have also said the top 5-10% of men. Which is by the way the average swiping right percentage of women on dating apps. It's the same with the term you are loosly throwing around, who are on the opposite side of the spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 03:30 AM

You know a mid woman with make-up can look pretty decent, especially at night. A 5 or 6 can easily transform herself into a 7 or 8 with the right make-up skills learned from social media. Chad does not give a fuck, if she is mid or super hot. He just pumps and dumps. Mids are also for chad way easier to commit to sex compared to the very hot ones. And are you sure, that most women, especially the younger generations, are themselves in a LTR? I think you are forgetting, that a good portion of tho…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 02:59 AM

Big problem is the lack of self awareness. We all know, that most women crave for LTR's. Yes, those "gased up mids" can in the age of social media date and fuck with chad. But chad has all the options in the world and won't commit. Why would he? Reason you see all those crying women on tiktok. One big aspect, why we are in this mess is, that love and dating have gotten in the age of social media heavily commodified. There was a muslim, who did a great quote. If you wanna destroy a society withou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 02:28 AM
1

It's a mix of feminism, birth control, indoctrination by the education system, social media and expensive cost of living.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 07:44 PM
4

Could not have said it better myself. In the past, most women and men were fighting for survival and both sexes were placed into very rigid gender roles. The difference between now and then is that men are still stuck in the single role of being the protector and provider. http://empathygap.uk/?p=271
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:04 PM
2

You are framing it, like a woman's body is the ONLY thing the majority of men want, and this is straight up wrong and far away from reality. You have a distorted view of men, because you are only seeing the patterns of the small pool of men, who have all the options. Those men pass women around and treat them as objects. I agree. Then comes a huge pool of men, who get barely any attention, who would concider a lot of women for a LTR (which inherently should tell you, that those average men are i…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 01:35 PM
3

Yes, it's called inner group bias. Men bond with other men mainly through hobbies, women can do it simply by just talking with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 08:11 AM
3

The minority of men, who are not invisible and have a ton of options are looking primarily for a body to use. FYP
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 04:42 AM
4

I advise every man to never lead with the wallet when it comes to dating. You will never be respected and you are in a losing position, unless your are not interested in a LTR.
/r/MensRights16/06/24 04:22 AM
-1

The reason for this is biological. Women are far more agreeable than men. If this would be not the case, children would be in a bad place.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:50 AM
0

I bet your dad was/is good looking. Reason why all the women ignored the red flags and the halo effect was in full display. Is my assumption right?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:43 AM
4

Maybe they get looked in a negative light by men, but not by society. If a man or a single mom are in the same bad economic situation, the man is looked as the loser, the single mom as the victim. She gets usually lots of sympathy by men and women. Empathy gap is real. I believe the major reason for this is the strong inner group bias of women and the strong outer group bias of men towards women. The weak inner group bias of men does make it even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 03:33 AM
26

Imaging in the past working 60 hours per week in the coal mine to support the family and having the thoughts: "How can i oppress my wife today?" And i like that default talking point "muh, women could not vote". Classic surface level thinking. The majority of men could not vote in the past either. The majority of men got the vote around 50 years earlier AND it was tied to military conscription, plus most women did not want the right to vote, since it came with responsibility. http://empathygap.u…
/r/MensRights14/06/24 04:30 AM
0

You can make the same argument about masculine men and replace sex with resources. It's basically the opposite side of the coin. The men you are describing are usually at the top of the foodchain in terms of looks and socio-economic status and are very often linked to dark triad traits. Those men can afford to have this mindset, since lots of women are drawn to those character traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 03:40 AM
3

I don't like it, that you give this "default" answer for all the subsets of the manosphere. Basically classic generalisation like the current "man vs bear" thing. Not everyone or the majority in the manosphere has this "fresh and fit" mindset.While MRA's mainly want to change the laws in our society, that treats men poorly (e.g. family court system), MGTOW's have completely checked out society and left the plantation, to just let the whole system burn down. Both subsets do not want to control wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 03:18 AM
2

A strong family with a father present helps massively young boys regarding mental health, not drifting into crime, drugs, addictions, etc. Why do you think young men and boys have so many issues nowadays? Fatherless generation with government being the new daddy.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 12:15 PM
6

Wait what? Marxist feminism the most harmless? As far as i remember, it's the version of feminism, that wants the cornerstone of society destroyed, which is the nuclear family. https://www.frontpagemag.com/marxist-feminisms-ruined-lives-mallory-millett/
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:28 AM

How do you explain then, when it comes to unilateral domestic violence, women leading with around 70% (aggregated by 1700 studies, check thetinmen, he made a post about all the scientific studies regarding DV from the last few decades) being the perpetrators in heterosexual relationships? And domestic violence has the highest occurrence in lesbian relationships and the lowest in gay relationships, while heterosexual relationships are somewhat in the middle.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 01:28 PM
2

Yeah dick is the only thing that is cheap and women can get it in masses on dating apps, but that's not the most valuable thing women are after. It's the relationship. The thing, that is behind a pay wall with the currency being feminine traits.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 12:48 PM
7

Imaging being ignorant about the fact, that men all over the world are more interested in politics than women. Hence why more politicians are men. I am still waiting for that 50/50 representation for brick layers or construction workers. The more important question regarding politicians should be: To what gender are they catering to, to get their votes? Make a guess, which gender has a stronger inner and which one has a stronger outer bias. That answers my question.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 10:00 PM
0

I think you are speaking from a position of being heavily biased. If you remove the billion dollar industries like the make-up industry and plastic surgery industry from the equasion, the bell curves of both sexes regarding looks are pretty much overlapping. Also i do think, that there is the same amount of unpleasant and pleasant people on both sides. You just happen to have tons of women, who go for the asshole personalities instead of the pleasant ones, since they are usually the ones, that a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:02 AM
13

I think what some people are forgetting is, that the men on both sides are forced to fight in this war.
/r/MensRights31/05/24 04:31 AM
6

Spain enters the chat.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 08:13 AM
3

Yeah it's basically brainwashing on a large scale with only a small fraction of the population knowing the truth. Women are in many western countries the majority of the voters. So polititians will cater to them. And since female inner group bias and the male outer group bias towards women is very strong, i have very less hope in the future for changes.
/r/MensRights24/05/24 07:36 PM
2

I am going to challenge your view now on domestic violence by telling you, that women are actually the majority of perpetrators (basically the opposite of what society and feminism is telling us). Well, to be fair, half of domestic violence is bilateral, but when it comes to unilateral DV, women are by far the majority of perpetrators of domestic violence. I back up this claim with 1700 scientific studies, that has been done over the last few decades from all around the world. This information w…
/r/MensRights24/05/24 05:14 PM
6

Just out of curiosity. What is your stance on domestic violence? Do you also believe, that men are mainly the perpetrators and women the victims?
/r/MensRights24/05/24 06:40 AM
5

It's just a simple math equation. It's 40% vs 25%. Which liberal pool is more likely to have more emotionally driven woke people?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 09:55 AM
2

We need to ask a different question. Cohabitating with a woman or a robot? Advantage of robots: - no false allegations - no domestic abuse - no divorce rape - no cheating - no gossiping
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:15 AM
2

Watch women getting magically out of the blue pregnant, once denmark is involved in a war.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 08:17 AM
2

You forgot to mention the part, where they mostly also get away with it, since society is turning a blind eye to relational violence. Mainly because that kind of violence is covert by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 01:04 PM
2

Google "men women iq" and filter for images. I hope you familiar with the bell curve.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 04:27 AM
16

Speaking facts is apparently dangerous. Great times we are living in.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 04:05 AM
17

WAY WAY more often with men my ass. It's common knowledge in science, that child abuse and murder happens way more often by the mother (~about 70% of all cases) Study, that collected 6 years data from reports. http://www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php
/r/MensRights18/03/24 09:22 PM
5

Yes. Study, that collected data over 6 years. Not only abusing, also killing. www.breakingthescience.org/SimplifiedDataFromDHHS.php
/r/MensRights31/01/24 06:06 PM
10

Thank you, great work as always. Dr. Donald Dutton has some good talks on YT available with pretty much the same numbers on domestic violence and is dismantling the feminist propaganda. I wish you added a slice at the end with the shelters available for each gender.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 02:35 PM
17

You make the mistake to see male and female violence as the same. Male violence is mostly physical, while female violence is mostly relational. One form of violence gets punished hard, the other one gets mostly ignored by society. Ergo most females get away with their violence, while men rot in jails.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 12:36 PM
17

Obviously talking about earth 2.
/r/MensRights19/10/23 01:11 AM
20

Someone should put that manually under the point "Groping.".
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:21 AM
1

"Thinking Ape" aka Stardust is a very underrated channel in the manosphere.
/r/MensRights16/09/23 02:31 PM
1

This is a great article and basically sums up everything, what is wrong with our current society.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 04:23 PM
1

"Chinese men are notorious cheaters". Can you back that up, or is it the source "Trust me bro"?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/23 04:45 AM
4

To combat this shit, we really need some "black mirror" recording lenses asap.
/r/MensRights17/08/23 10:40 PM
1

Maybe you should tell her, that women are responsible for the majority of child abuse AND child murder. Both numbers are between 70 - 71%. They collected data for the study over 6 years.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 07:37 PM
0

Toxic feminism is real and harms men just as much as women.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 12:27 AM
6

It's not about all women are evil, more about the system, that is deeply corrupt and heavily favours women in courts and that pushes men often to the brink of self deletion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 06:26 AM
2

Just a feeling i guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/23 06:04 AM
15

Bettina Arndt has a great article on substack, how in Australia most of the public service jobs are now in the hand of women. https://bettinaarndt.substack.com/p/women-in-charge
/r/MensRights14/04/23 12:39 PM
2

His youtube channel is called GEN
/r/MensRights07/04/23 03:18 PM
4

The asian guy, who was interviewing the crazy feminist makes actually really good content.
/r/MensRights02/04/23 01:23 AM
11

Imagine we had the same sex drive as women. Humanity would be already extinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/23 07:32 PM
38

The classic starfish position.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 04:32 AM
5

We need some 24/7 "Black Mirror" video recording lenses, to combat this issue.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 10:17 AM
6

There is a term for that. It's called relational aggression/violence. The weapon of choice of a female, since she cannot compete (in average) with the physical aggression of a male. Unfortunately our society turns a blind eye on this kind of violence.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:54 AM
1

5% of the tinder male user base is legit the chad type. So the numbers basically match, what the women are chasing on those platforms.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 04:35 AM
2

So you are saying most women are not chasing chad. I genuinely wanna know from you, how you explain the female average right swipe rate of 5% on dating apps, compared to the male of around 50%. So basically in average women ignore 19 out of 20 men on those platforms. And this is only matching.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 07:37 AM
5

Nope, you are just not grounded in reality. This has nothing to do with sexism. AND women != Feminism btw.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:21 PM
10

Clearly feminism had nothing to do with this. She had just for fun "aquaris, mommy, advocate, feminist" in her Facebook bio. /s
/r/MensRights19/02/23 03:54 PM
29

People should not forget, by what ideology she is driven by. Her facebook bio: "aquarius. mommy. advocate. feminist."
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:58 PM
7

Misandrist feminists weapon of choice is relational violence, which kills men all over the world by pushing them to suicide. False allegations and parental alienation during the divorce phase for example.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 04:35 AM
1

Yes, slightly. https://youtu.be/WHcQ\_gx5bbk?t=169
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/23 03:07 PM
0

What the hell are you babbling about? This is a meta study based on 270 studies, that are based on DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. There is no focus on "women beating men". You just don't like the results of the meta study, which shows, that women are equally or more physical violent than men in relationships. And when it comes to severity, women get in average only slightly more injured than men. You can find it actually out, by diving into the big pool of studies, which are part of the meta study. https://…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/23 04:28 PM
0

Give me a fking break. How about stop spreading your propaganda from your echo chamber? Love to help you out with actual facts: Is 270 studies on the topic enough for you? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261543769_References_Examining_Assaults_by_Women_on_Their_Spouses_or_Male_Partners_An_Updated_Annotated_Bibliography And yeah, women dont kill their spouses that often, but they certainly help with their relational aggression like parental alienation for example to delete themself.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 09:28 PM
8

It must feel great to live in a world, where relational violence caused mainly by women gets barely punished because society turns a blind eye.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/23 07:00 PM
7

Last time i checked the birthrate for South Korea, it was around 0.9. You need a birthrate of 2.1, to keep a population stable without immigration included. My theory why the birthrate is one of the lowest of the world is, because SK has the craziest feminists over there. Basically western radical feminists on steroids and men are fighting very hard back in this country. I would say SK is one of the countries, where the gender war is actually visible for normal people. Since a few months there i…
/r/MensRights24/10/22 08:29 PM
19

3 times higher of being victim of a violent crime
/r/AntiFeminists21/10/22 03:17 PM
2

There is a big difference between delaying sex for a few dates and putting someone into the friendzone. The whole thing about putting a guy into the friendzone is by showing, that you are not interested in a romantic relationship in the first place. There is a counterpart for women btw. In this age of dating, women get often stuck in the fuckzone, because they are very often shooting to high and desperately want that the guy to commit, that is a few levels above her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 01:19 PM
3

Why are you bringing sex into this? My point was about dating in general. Before you are interested in his "personality", the guy has to run through many other filters first, before personality gets even considered. Why do you think, women swipe in average on dating apps only 5% to the right? Because of personality?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/22 01:44 PM
0

I think we are unfortunately designed this way by our creator/nature. Imagine men would be as selective in the dating market as women are with the same libido, that women have. Our species would be already extinct.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 04:40 PM
0

I say the data is pretty accurate regarding the western population, since it is nowadays the norm, how you meet up people. Most people date through online platforms in the western world.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 04:28 PM
3

Bingo. This whole personality thing is just an excuse to not get percieved as shallow. Females are equally, if not more shallow, when it comes to mating.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 04:18 PM
1

I think your wording is wrong and confused me. I am not native english and i think "attracted to" is the right wording.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 04:13 PM
1

This is the beauty about technology in our modern world. You can collect data on almost any topic in this day and age. Swiping statistics on dating apps tell a different story. In average men swipe 50% to the right, women 5%. This does contradict with your statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 10:50 AM
3

Type in at YT "The Most Brutal Dating App Experiment". He created a fake account on a dating app by being a 57 year old overweight woman. Look at the insane attention she is still receiving. It's actually not funny. Most average men would be happy, to get this amount of attention. Of course she will have it very hard, to get into a relationship, because that is the hard part for a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 07:46 AM
3

The good old no scotsman fallacy =)
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:58 PM
2

Just a quick reminder, that females rulers wage war more often than male rulers. This nonsense has to stop, that a world with female leaders would be a peaceful place. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4454964/Female-rulers-27-likely-wage-WAR-males.html
/r/AntiFeminists05/10/22 02:08 PM
1

Can you actually back that post up with sources?
/r/ExRedPill29/09/22 09:16 PM
1

You can't be more wrong regarding the severity of the injuries. Women are getting in average only slightly more injured and when it comes to one-sided abuse in the relationship, they make up 70% of the DV cases. Check out the 10 minute video from Dr. Donald Dutton on YT. Just look for a black/white video by searching for his name. He is citing in his talk the results of multiple studies and he devoted 45 years of his life in the field of DV.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 05:46 PM
6

We have to many people brainwashed by the propaganda of a certain movement, that is currently in the 4. wave. This movement loves to show extreme cases on male domestic abuse in combination with cherry picking data to strengthen their narrative. This gets stated by psychology professor Donald Dutton, who has excellent talks about this topic on YT. He has 45 years of experience in the field of DV. I advise to watch his 10 minute talk (black/white video) on YT. There is also a meta study from 2014…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 06:28 PM
9

Well, this actually does not surprise me. I would count spain as in the top 5, of the biggest feminist shit holes in the world.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 11:58 AM
1

I think this is a massive cope. There is a new study that shows, that in this day and age women are more likely to cheat than men. And social media plays a big role in it. There is only a small pool of men, that have all the options. An average looking women has with social media an insane amount of options compared to the average looking guy. It's not even close. A couple made an experiment on tinder. Both used the photos of their partner and they basically swapped their sexes on the platform. …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 07:34 AM
9

There is the problem. What you believe might be a noble thing, but does not really matter in the grand scale, where you have basically with your mindset no influence. Feminism does not advocate for equality, it never has. There is not a single law in the west, that favors men. I can think of a bunch of laws in place, that favor women.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 08:42 AM
5

What you fail to recognize is, that there is only a small pool of men, who are fucking the majority of the women. Dating app data and statistics are a beautiful thing in this day and age. It reveals everything. Do you unterstand, that the average woman has it very easy to have sex compared to the average man, who is for most women invisible? Hence the reason why there is not really a male slut.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 08:18 AM
8

Of course this shit is pathetic same as being addicted to porn. I am not babying men, i was just pointing out WHY men are doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 12:13 PM
16

Porn and OF satisfy completely different needs. OF is more about building a connection to the content creator. It's the intimacy, that many lonely men crave. And many of them are willing to spend a lot of money for this. A big reason why men are doing this is, because they don't have fear rejection like in real life. It's a sad world.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 10:23 AM
1

Very unlikely, but there should be a decent amount of the listed studies inside the meta study accessible.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 07:55 PM
3

270 empirical studies and 73 reviews demonstrating that women are as physically aggressive as men (or more) in their relationships with their spouses or opposite-sex partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 440,850 people. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-013-9194-1
/r/MensRights16/09/22 09:45 AM
2

I associate toxic femininity with relational aggression. Relational aggression is basically non physical aggression like reputation destruction, spreading rumors, lying and excluding someone from a social circle. RA is usually the weapon of choice for females and gets barely punished by society, since it's often very hard to proof compared to physical aggression.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:40 PM
15

If you wanna know more about the topic, i advise you to check out the stuff of canadian psychology professor Donald Dutton, who did spend 45 years of his life in the field of domestic violence. He is talking a lot about the mentioned studies, that are inside the meta study. Dutton has great talks on YT. If you don't have much time, you can check out his B/W 10 minute video on YT, that lets you rethink domestic violence. In his longer talks he is also mentioning, how feminism has spread just prop…
/r/AntiFeminists12/09/22 10:08 AM
55

"270 empirical studies and 73 reviews demonstrating that women are as physically aggressive as men (or more) in their relationships with their spouses or opposite-sex partners." meta study: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-013-9194-1
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/22 09:40 PM
2

Strong independent feminist in the front and a cowering weak man in the back. Welcome to 2022.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/22 09:21 PM
2

Since men are on the content creation side the minority, they make only 16% of the money, that goes in sum out to the creators. I got a new number btw. OF paid in the year 2021 alone, 5 Billion to all creators.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 09:08 PM
39

BuT iSn'T FeMinIsm SuPposEd To bE FoR mEn AnD WoMeN?? /s
/r/MensRights06/09/22 02:50 PM
7

From the numbers i heard, is that the CEO paid more than 2 billion dollars (the number might be old nowadays) to the OF creators for all the subscriptions. Women get 84% from the money, men get 16%.Boycotts are almost impossible, Feminism is growing to many betas and simps, that don't have the mental willpower, to reject OF and pron. Those poor souls crave for intimacy, even if its fake from the online world, and spend their hard earned cash.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 09:06 PM
5

How about a big meta study, that includes 270 empiric studies, that show females are equally physically violent (or more) in relationships with the opposite sex. Sample size: 440000 people. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12119-013-9194-1 Wikipedia, fuck you sincerely.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 07:56 PM
3

Yeah, look up her substack. She reveals a lot about the cancer in australia. I advise the article regarding australian public service. To be honest, i dont wanna grow up as a boy in australia right now.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 07:40 PM
2

Don't do the the mistake, and just label me as an incel. I would rate myself as average, maybe slightly above and i am 6 feet tall. i just excluded myself from the dating game since a long time. You want my sources? Here you go: Regarding women dating/marrying up: https://ifstudies.org/blog/better-educated-women-still-prefer-higher-earning-husbandsRegarding women dont like sensitive men: (i had a better study for this, but i cant find it) https://www.israel21c.org/women-really-dont-like-sensitiv…
/r/ExRedPill05/09/22 06:37 PM
6

If you look at the yearly US rape numbers over the last the decade, you see a huge increase in rapes in the last years. To be honest, i don't think the amount of rapes have increased, i think the false accusations have massively increased, because it's being used as a weapon and most females know, that there are basically no consequenses to face with our current court system in place.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 07:18 AM
1

Ok, i see where you are coming from now. To be honest, i am actually glad, that JP debates those very few feminists, because in my opinion, there is to less debating going on in the western culture regarding feminism, and i think feminism as a whole is trying to avoid it, because they inherently know, they lose most of the arguments and prefer to retain status quo. Pushing the propaganda and profiting from their victim mindset.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 07:11 AM
1

Show me a single interview, where a feminist crucifies JP with her arguments.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 06:55 PM
1

There are studies out there, that show, that if the man is too emotional in a relationship, the female loses all the attraction for him and the relationship goes usually south. In average. I agree, that to a certain extent, that men should show their emotions, but not on a basis a female does. Men and women process emotions differently, because we are inherently different. It's not only the studies, that show this, i can also speak from my experience. An ex girlfriend lost all the attraction in …
/r/ExRedPill04/09/22 05:00 PM
0

Where the heck is feminism advocating for men's rights or issues? Receipts please.
/r/ExRedPill31/08/22 07:39 PM
3

Feminists avoid debates, because they don't wanna give men's issues any spot light in the public (most men's issues are unknown to the average person) , since this would take away part of the resources and power, that feminism gains with their victimhood.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 12:08 PM
3

Unfortunately lonely and desperate men, that seek for any form of intimacy.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 05:43 PM
12

Instead of believing all that propaganda of your idiology, you should start listening to people, who devoted multiple decades of their life in the field of DV. One name comes to my mind: Donald Dutton
/r/MensRights21/01/22 10:17 AM
1

What you lack, is critical thinking. All you are presenting, are the bullet points of a left leaning highly questionable german documentary, with the title "gender data gap", that got downvoted into oblivion. Have you ever thought, that men are the lab rats for medical testing, because it could affect the womens future pregnancy? Ever heard, that men are the expendable sex?
/r/MensRights20/12/21 06:22 PM
1

Most members of the intellectual dark web (IDW)
/r/MensRights17/12/21 12:12 PM
3

The adult industry exploits both men an women.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 10:06 PM
1

Relational violence (which includes psychological violence) was and will always be the weapon of choice by females to harm other human beings. This is just mind-boggling.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 01:23 PM
5

This organization has probably never heard of Donald Dutton. A Canadian psychology professor, who devoted 45 years of his life in the field of domestic violence. There are many talks of Don Dutton on Youtube, where he presents studies and aggregated meta studies with up to 130k datapoints/cases, that DV in the western world is ~50% bilateral (both genders in the relationship are violent), ~35% of the DV is woman on man and ONLY ~15% of the violence is man on woman. He explicitly says, that he is…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 10:40 AM
1

After seeing this reddit post, i watched 2 talks of Donald Dutton and i have to say it is really scary to see in what propaganda driven society we are living... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=--Pk25vBeHg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrksEyW_Lko
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:28 AM
1

Can someone explain to me, what major's fall into the category "Subs Allied to Medicine"?
/r/MensRights02/07/21 01:02 PM
1

The Red Pill community teaches men to not be an orbiter. I wish, i had this knowledge 20 years ago.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 03:28 PM
2

Men = success objects.
/r/MensRights26/06/21 09:53 AM
9

That's easy to answer. Just look at a woman's laundry list of requirements in the dating market.
/r/MensRights19/06/21 11:28 PM
9

The caller was really bad prepared. He got cut off multiple times by the host's very annoying loud voice, which is very unprofessional. This made the caller really insecure and he had problems to voice his arguments. There are so many topics, that he could have mention, like the suicide rates, homelessness rates, etc. Regarding the DV, i personally would have come up with a small anecdote about Erin Pizzey, who build as a feminist back in the 70's the first UK shelter for abused women. After she…
/r/MensRights18/06/21 07:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter