TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tonyh322 Archive

View 1 posts and 42 comments by tonyh322 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

tonyh322/r/MensRights26/10/16 10:15 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

You are willfully ignoring that convictions require evidence on both sides of that situation. Yes, it is possible that without enough evidence or good enough case an actual rapist might not be convicted and allowed to go free, this also happens with murderers. But it is the way our court system is set up to protect the innocent. But by that same token without enough evidence you cannot convict someone of filing a false claim. It doesn't mean if the accused is not found guilty the accuser is foun…
/r/MensRights24/09/18 10:51 AM
2

34 hours a week on average. More demanding management roles and professional jobs. No.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 11:40 AM
1

I would wager it is pretty common among same sex parents for them to still tend to take on separate masculine and feminine roles.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 10:52 AM
40

Did he force them to watch him masturbate? This is why this shit is out of control. Louis CK didn't force anyone to do anything. The dude had a kink. He always asked. Nobody ever said no. And he still got shamed out of Hollywood. Nobody is safe, the bar is set so low and nobody requires any proof or due process any more.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 12:30 PM
2

And they should be able to face their accuser. Basically they should get the same due process we all do. No matter what you think of Betsy DeVos, if she successfully gets rid of kangaroo courts then in my eyes she will be the best Secretary of Education in this country's history.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:49 AM
2

You should see how much less men get paid in porn.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:20 AM
1

When in actuality I don't understand why the law gets involved at all. Everything you do while intoxicated is your responsibility...except fucking for some reason. Drive a car and kill someone, it's murder, can't claim an exception because you're intoxicated. Gamble away your life savings, your responsibility. Take a piss by the side of the road, public indecency. But if a girl fucks someone she didn't want to for some reason that's not her responsibility? I will never understand this.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 11:45 AM
1

You're putting words in my mouth. Being blacked out is different than being drunk. If someone fingers me while I'm unconscious, of course that's rape. But if I get drunk and give asshole fingering consent, that's on me.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 12:43 PM
8

Why is it anything else you do while drunk is your responsibility except when it involves your crotch? Get drunk and go driving and kill someone; your fault. Get drunk go gambling and lose your house; your fault. Get drunk and tell a guy he can finger you; rape.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 10:29 AM
1

There's two sides to that line of thinking though. I get what you're saying that if "shitstain human being A" comes forward and gets a really harsh sentence then there is less of a motivation for "shitstain human being B" to come forward. But you also have to consider "shitstain human being C" who is considering accusing someone of rape and saw that you can buy yourself 4 years and get off lenient by doing it. I feel so bad for Jonathan, honestly I do, but I'm more concerned about people like my…
/r/MensRights15/05/17 11:57 AM
12

Anecdotal though it may be, there are a lot of things you see when you start exploring men's rights that you wouldn't think you could. I can't see a man calling the police because his wife is beating him and then him being arrested and leaving his wife alone in the house with their kids...but it happens. You don't think there are rules the police are supposed to follow and those rules certainly don't say "arrest the man, no questions asked, no matter what". But it happens.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:11 PM
38

Your comment I replied to said "we had forums on how to prevent men from abusing their spouses". Nothing about "and vice versa" and even if this one shelter in particular did have mens and womens seminars and they were equal in terms of availability and content (which honestly is quite hard to believe) that is not the norm which is a problem. The norm is that shelters are for women because they are the abused and seminars are for men because they are the abusers. Just scroll through just the com…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:52 PM
57

From the start though just having forums on how to prevent men from abusing their spouses is a problem. Marital abuse IS NOT gendered.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 12:22 PM
1

I said there was a case for it, not that I took it. I agree with you completely. I use all my sick and personal leave every year. I wouldn't criticize someone else in my situation for not though, I make a comfortable living but maybe others need that bonus of their surplus leave at the end of the year.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 03:30 PM
1

No, THERE IS NO WAGE GAP. There have been two congressional measures passed to ensure this, one during the Obama administration. Ever wonder how there is so much rhetoric about a wage gap but never any court cases considering it is federally illegal to pay women less for equal work? Because it doesn't happen.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 12:25 PM
3

Well, some jobs, like mine, pay you for surplus of leave pas the carryover limit at the end of the year. Also, my sick leave never expires and I get paid for all of it when I leave this job. So there is incentive in some cases not to just take off because. Mo' money.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 12:23 PM
2

Um, when you're the president of the United States I don't think anyone is your equal. That's not sexism, that's just logic.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:19 PM
57

"Male sexual organ? That's the part used for rape, right?" -women, probably
/r/MensRights03/11/16 07:11 PM
3

It seems we are pretty much never going to dispel this rumor when anyone who uses Google News for their news is going to get a face full of this this morning. No information about how the study was conducted or what criteria was used, just, now apparently women make a whole third less than men for similar work and it is going to take 170 years to fix it.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 10:17 AM
36

Your comments sidestep around the fact that the child does indeed have a father who would be responsible for child support if he can be found.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:21 PM
3

Yes! 100% yes. It's no different if the person was simply completely out-classed. Or had an undisclosed injuray. Or got stung by a fucking bee in the middle of the match. Your decisions are yours. If they are bad decisions, deal with them and stop trying to put them on other people. You got drunk. You got your face rearranged. It's 100% on you and literally nobody else. And the kicker is the law would decide that way too 10 times out of 10. Assuming this is a legal boxing match at a gym or some …
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:46 PM
3

That shouldn't matter, I'm sorry I don't think rape is as blurry as you make it seem. If someone agrees to have sex with me and falls asleep during I am not a rapist unless I continue knowing full well she has fallen asleep. In her story she does not say that she continues any interaction with him after he falls asleep. She doesn't ride him or shove his face into her, she wakes him up to change the music and he tries again to fuck her with his limp dick. Not rape. Drunk or not you are responsibl…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:40 PM
3

When he's unconscious he's not doing anything. It's not like she's riding him or shoving his hand in herself while he's passed out in her story. If that were the case then yes it would be clear-cut rape. Rape is a lot easier to identify than your average feminist would have you believe. That's not what happens in her story. He is making decisions while drunk and she says that he falls asleep a few times during. If she had decided to interact with him sexually while he was asleep that would be ra…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:34 PM
3

Not the same. That is the tattoo parlor going the extra mile, they are under no legal obligation to do so. You can't report to the police that someone gave you a tattoo while you were drunk and try to put any of the responsibility on the tattoo parlor. Sex is literally the only thing I can think of where the decisions an adult makes while intoxicated are argued to not be their responsibility and it is, in my opinion, nonsense. "It is also something done to you" is such a silly new wave way of pu…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 06:27 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about? Of course that's rape. I'm talking about DECISIONS you make while intoxicated. We are discussing a story Amy Schumer told about how she was sober and a man was drunk and that man invited her over, fingered her, ate her out, and tried (twice) to fuck her with his whiskey dick. Those are all his decisions but because he is drunk the narrative is "rape" which unfortunately could be the case if the genders were reversed. My main point is that if you, an adult, MA…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:20 PM
3

But that doesn't progress the narrative. By calling her a rapist you are calling every guy in that situation a rapist. Men's rights, that's what this sub is, isn't about "getting even". It's about instituting change.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:02 PM
27

I disagree. Literally anything else you do while drunk is your responsibility. Why all of a sudden when dicks and vaginas are involved can you not be held accountable for your decisions? In my opinion there should be no line. If you are an adult and you choose to get so drunk that your vision is so impaired that you would fuck Amy Schumer that is on you just the same as it is on you if you decide driving would be good idea.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:59 PM
9

That's a completely different scenario. Did you read the story posted? In her story the man took all the action, he invited her over, pushed her on the bed, fingered her, went down on her, tried to have sex with her. These are all his decisions but because he was drunk and she was sober the narrative is "rape". He chose to put himself in an intoxicated state and he is still responsible for his actions whether he is blitzed or not because he is an adult. He's an adult, if he regrets what he did m…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:56 PM
2

Good thing they only let adults drink. It is not for the government, police, society, or the justice system to decide what to do about the things an adult does while intoxicated. You chose to put yourself in that state, the things you do in that state are still your responsibility. Even if it is something as repulsive as chewing on Amy Schumer's squish mitten.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:51 PM
156

The problem is what you're describing is something that we as men for men's rights are trying to prevent happening. Making poor consensual decisions while intoxicated shouldn't be a cause to "cry rape". I don't get out of my decisions to drive, gamble, fight, or dial my ex when I'm drunk, I shouldn't get out of my decision to have sex and neither should any man or woman. We should be fighting against that social injustice, not also "crying rape" because that's the way it would play out if the ro…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 01:48 PM
0

Have you seen the movie recently? Robin Williams is the bad guy, sneaks behind his wife's back to be the cool dad and throw a party for their son who is under-performing at school after his wife and him agree not to, I personally don't think that is petty. And the movie tells us this isn't the first time and is just the straw that breaks the camel's back and they get a divorce. They have an argument to reveal to us that this is one in a long history of problems they have in their marriage. Then …
/r/MensRights12/08/16 02:42 PM
5

Come on. It's a comedy so you're not supposed to take it seriously but you certainly shouldn't pull any infringement on men's rights out of it. I actually saw this movie recently. Robin Williams character is the bad guy at the beginning of the movie. He goes against what his wife and he agreed and throws a party for his son who was told no because he is under-performing in school. They get a divorce and he doesn't have a job. The employed parent should get custody, male or female. The best they …
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:31 PM
5

I'm not Superman. My eyes can't hurt anyone.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 01:26 PM
95

This but unironically.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 07:31 PM
1

The laws you are citing are there to define non-consent, not consent and there is a very clear difference. The law doesn't get to decide for me whether I agree to sex and it doesn't seek to because the legal system isn't there to protect people from having sex that they want to have. They are there to protect people from having sex they don't want. I have never had sex that I didn't want, period. That means I have consented to every sexual encounter I have ever had. Not everyone is so lucky but …
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:37 PM
0

Drunk sex and wake-up sex do not automatically constitute lack of consent. No, I've never had sex while I was so drunk I didn't know what was happening and consent to it. I've never woken up to sex I didn't consent to. Your second sentence doesn't even make sense to me. It sounds like you're saying if one person "finishes" first during sex their partner may not consent to continuing to engage in the act for a couple seconds until the other is finished? Regardless, no, I have never been in the si…
/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:56 PM
1

Sorry, but that's not a fact. I've never had sex I didn't fully consent to.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:28 PM
4

The sarcasm is that it will happen. It won't.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 04:32 PM
12

The simple solution is really the correct solution. I have no problem at all with female only spaces as long as male only spaces are also available...but that's gonna happen /s
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:29 PM
1

I'd be curious as to the age of the OP and his friends. These do not seem like the comments of well-adjusted adults. Especially "losers". If these are really "friends", even if they don't agree, you posting it clearly says this is something important to you and "friends" responding with childish statements like that isn't something I see happening with grown men and women.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:27 PM
-1

I agree with the statement "If you don't want to lose nudes don't keep them on a tiny flash drive that you use every day." Agreed. That's just stupid. The comment I'm replying to is: if the twit doesn't want people looking at nude pictures of herself, then she shouldn't make nude pictures of herself. That's not a very sex positive statement. Taking nude pictures of yourself shouldn't be discouraged on the basis that you might lose them or have them stolen. But this particular individual didn't e…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:41 PM
5

We can find that level of entitlement insane but also be sex positive, cant' we? People shouldn't be afraid to take nude pictures of themselves because they can be lost or stolen. But if they are you need to act like a sane human being.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter