TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

toooooommmmmy Archive

View 0 posts and 88 comments by toooooommmmmy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-14

It was just a few lines and you didn't read it through but decided to make a silly assumption instead. This shouldn't be this hard ...
/r/MensRights21/03/16 04:12 PM
-9

Yeah, but the stereotype remains (women->motherhood->a risk to hire). This shouldn't be this hard ...
/r/MensRights21/03/16 04:10 PM
-32

Yeah, people don't want to watch female as much male athletes because women just aren't as good. But that's, I guess, because evolution has build them to become mothers and not runners, throwers etc. You know, wide pelvis, high on fat and low on muscles etc. Besides: "Women are not as career oriented and don't have the same competitive drive because they have a mother instinct". I'm not saying that these are good arguments but there is some merit to them.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:15 PM
-68

the same pay for less work Women should be given more money for less productivity (or for less work in some cases) because motherhood on average penalizes them at the work market. An argument that's not without some merit. Of course the road of affirmative action is endless -- and would never benefit white men even when they were clearly disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:50 AM
1

Yes, but as I said Sweden has no gender quotas. Now vote me down, you silly people. :)
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:20 AM
-4

I'm pretty sure that Sweden has no gender quotas. I seem to remember that they are possible for a short period to correct a big imbalance.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 02:27 PM
2

Yeah, one last point, though. There are huge amounts of people south of the USA who consider themselves whites (mostly of Spanish and Portuguese descent). Some of them are also descendants of the slave owners the same way as in the USA. Unless you factor them in, it looks as if your not talking about the white guilt but the US guilt. Just saying.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 11:36 AM
1

Normally slave owners don't want their property to perish. So ... are you saying that certain tropical illnesses or what-not have something to do with the issue at hand? Anyway, the percentage of blacks is about the same in Brazil. Then share of mixed race people is on the other hand several times higher. But I'm wlling to believe that the US has been a better place than Brazil, for example, for the poorest simply because it's been richer. In very poor places the very poor tend to die off in eve…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 09:22 AM
1

Because the "races" didn't mix there as much as elsewhere. (I'm also a bit confused that there is no slave trade to the Spanish and French parts of North America, only to the US.)
/r/MensRights20/03/16 08:49 AM
2

Tell him that his veins appear blue through his white skin and therefore he should also consider himself guilty of all the bad things the Spanish royal family and other high nobility did in the past. If he doesn't buy it because he's not related to them in any way, he'll be on the right track away from his silliness.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 06:33 AM
6

Another argument for this unpaid work thing is that 1) women do more housework than men when they live alone and 2) after they get married they work less on the whole (with the exception of young mothers at least in some statistics) although they do somewhat more housework (or a lot if they are housewives). To get things equal we, or a couple should thus agree on what is the Right Amount of Housework and, on the other hand, paid work that should be done. Then we should divide that time equally s…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 04:32 PM
1

Can't speak for him or her but nowadays people cite from a thing called the Internet. I usually google and then read the article or the abstract which I then cite. Try t!
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:00 PM
0

There are other alternatives. Women can have both family and career if: the public sector finances the choice (as it already does but not for every women), they find a woman who finance them they choose a career where competition isn't too hard (less men who need or want to push to the limit) just excel in something
/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:10 PM
0

People tend to be abusive. Men aren't much better. I'm trying to learn not to be abusive. It's not easy because you can't know beforehand where your actions are going to lead to. If your kid, for example, is behaving in a destructive way, it's very hare to know should you be strict, angry, gentle or something else. I decided years ago to try to be a bit better people every day. Sorry about the rambling ... but this is important to me. But "real domestic violence" is, of course rare.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 08:40 PM
2

I assume that it tries to define what the word "rape" means generally.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 06:06 PM
3

I'm "Caucasian" (sic) but my country men have never really been part of any imperialist processes or racism. Perhaps I'll kill myself anyways just to make the world a better place.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:59 PM
6

Feminists have lied about the gendered nature of DV, or what kind of a gendered nature it has, for decades. Nobody has lied, AFAIK, about the suicide numbers. Of course both are rare. But still I'd say we are fighting evil people. People who, for example, spend time (and probably tax money) to tell that men killing themselves are, somehow, not all that important. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:50 PM
23

In Finland a guy a week ago had to put a stop on his pretty successful TV career because he had been filming his sex life with several women. He himself says that he did because he wanted to play it safe, avoid rape accusations in other words. Perhaps, who knows ... I'd say probably. Another media personality and a very successful business man told him to come out with the whole truth. He was accused of rape about then years ago. But luckily for him he had started to record everything when women…
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:33 PM
1

This is so insane, Emma Watson is so utterly stupid that, really, shouldn't we be doing something else than thinking about what this thing said? Like making the world a better place by doing something about the western civilization that is going down the drain or something else worthwhile.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 05:19 PM
1

Is she old enough to vote :) If she is, there's something very wrong with world.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 12:40 PM
1

I had an email conversation lasting about two weeks and ten quite long emails with a well-known - male - feminist. At first mhy only point was to tell him that he should not use the WEF Gender Gap "study" because it's flawed. I also told why. He again then told that he's been married to two feminists and thus knows what he's talking about, although he is a professor of management (or something along those lines). By the way, this is a "getting it off my chest" post. It came to my mind because th…
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:35 PM
2

Everything we experience is based on (Bayesina) probability. Every human calculates these (Bayesian) probabilities every second. That's how we are built. It's really, really strange that this concept seems to be so hard understand. I'm not talking about feminists who get most things wrong frequently but even reasonable, well-educated people.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:53 PM
1

I just talked about this with my wife. Who in her/his real mind thinks something so stupid that the media doesn't describe people in an unrealistic way, both genders. She didn't. Yeah, feminists are crazy, but I mean normal people. https://www.popworkouts.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/brad-pitt-workout-routine-body-troy.jpg
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:29 PM
3

I would never hire a lawyer who's reputation has been, well, let's be frank, trashed. Unless the case involved something really special he woudl be an expert at. Then again, my mother once hired a former Nazi (yeah, a real one but she didn't know it) as a lawyer and he did a great job.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:21 PM
1

Most people, women and men (in fact, all reasonable people who know about these things*), seem to agree with the MRA views and disagree with the feminist views. Some of them just don't realize it yet. But many do, but have decided not to talk about it because there is a cultural meme that makes them look evil if they do. I think this whole thing -- how something so many hate (feminism and it's hate filled, immoral propaganda) has so much power and how this thing that so many agree with (MRA) is …
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:49 AM
2

What are his chances of not becoming a target for feminist minded judges, prosecutors and other immoral people?
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:40 AM
2

In Germany about hundred years ago people started to hate the poor Jews who were escaping the pogroms in eastern, Russian Europe. Nazis didn't invent the hatred towards the Jews but made is one of the key points in their propaganda. A few words about feminists in the article would have been welcome.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:28 PM
5

In many (most?) countries women try to murder husbands more than men but are unsuccessful. I don't know what to think about this fact. Are psychopath (et al.) women poor murderers or do they lack the "final" will?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:19 PM
4

English is probably the easiest natural language, I've been told, because it's not the native tongue of anybody, in a sense, and because of billions of not-English spekaing people have had to learn it. But, yeah, the three other languages I speak are in some sense more logical.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:08 AM
2

Ok. I just thought it rhymes, sort of.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 01:35 AM
1

Not all. There is, after all the fact that women tend to get pregnant and then, perhaps, stay at home. This makes hiring a woman a risky business. Trust me, I've been there. Discrimination? Hard to say. But then again there are studies saying that employers consider men, young men in particular, unreliable. Discrimination? Certainly! Almost nobody just don't talk about it. Not even here. And this, that people don't trust young men is The Problem. THE PROBLEM.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 01:33 AM
1

Women are guilty of domestic violence as often as men (or actually more so but lets not go there). Vile rhetorics!
/r/MensRights15/03/16 01:24 AM
1

Doesn't more and less go together better than more and fewer? Thanks anyway. My primary goal is to get my English so good that nobody feels insulted, sorry, offended when I try to sell them something.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 01:06 AM
23

Women want to marry up and stay that way. While the gender gap is widening that is becoming more and more difficult: less marriages, more divorces.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:13 PM
3

Patriarchy is a fringe theory that is obviously wrong. Feminism is in the center of power.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:03 PM
3

In Finland and other Nordic countries: If a person forces someone into sexual intercourse by using violence or threat of violence, the person is to be convicted for rape. How hard can it be to make a law gender neutral?
/r/MensRights14/03/16 02:25 PM
-3

Clinton is a corrupt, lying criminal. Prove it. Don't get me wrong, I despise her. Fortunately I don't have to choose between her and Trump because I can't vote. Then again I admire Trump as a person who exists outside The Narrative. But he sounds a bit crazy nevertheless.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:32 PM
3

All people, said Plato, think that they stand for good things (I would add that almost all but that's besides the point). So, feminists think they stand for something good and so do do MRAs. After years of studying, I'd say, that the difference is this: MRAs usually talk about facts while feminists don't.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:56 PM
2

It's important that Fox Business decided to share this piece of important business news - or lie. Will there come a point when nobody believes anything , any news that has the words women and suffer? I mean, I don't, but what about the public in general. Is lying, in other words, going to be a winning strategy or will the public wake up?
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:47 PM
28

"Hey guys, I'm going to tell lies about how you're pigs Want to join? No? You pigs!"
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:33 PM
6

Young women spend about three to five time more than young men. Only stupid companies don't take this in account. Sadly, it means more hatred towards men. Women don't necessarily hate men but quite a few of them thinks it's OK. That's what they have been told.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:21 AM
7

Yeah, 40% is kind of feminist, men are pigs propaganda
/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:52 PM
1

Google was an example of a larger trend: why and how the most successful companies utilize diversity.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:02 PM
1

I hear you but firms like Google seem to disagree. First you want productive diversity and then you decide how you can try to achieve it in practice. Apparently the only way is to classify people according to some idea of probability (not Ivy league, not white male geniuses, perhaps women ...)
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:26 PM
0

Similarity brings about more similarity, diversity conflict and change. Another question is what kind of a conflict is productive. Sexist people (feminists for example) seem to think that it's the sex, gender that is the key issue. But not only them. Google at first wanted to recruit similar people than the founders (ivy league, mathematical excellence ...) But then they realized that they'll need diversity as well. That meant recruiting more minority people and women. I seem to remember that th…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:07 PM
1

http://archive.is/XnteC doesn't work in Finland.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:17 PM
2

Patriarchy is a fringe theory. More people believe that the sun revolves around the earth (which, in a way, happens to be true, unlike patriarchy).
/r/MensRights04/03/16 08:15 PM
27

This app rapes statistical analysis. It also rapes the diversity that we call the human condition.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 07:16 PM
2

Exactly It's as if the women who answer to these surveys realized what kind of sexist results are looked for and decide to lie. Of course all men and women have been offended by the "opposite" sex unless they live in a barrel. As well as by the same sex.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 06:34 PM
2

A couple of decades ago you could eventually end up in prison for not paying your fines. Nowadays you'll get a criminal or credit record saying that you've got unpaid fines that you refuse to pay. That makes life a bit harder. You can't get a bank loan, for example, or at least it'll be much harder. And then the state will seize the money anyways from your salary.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:26 AM
10

Where I live you never pay anything to your ex wife. If you're too poor to pay to your children living with you ex the state pays instead. If you could pay but won't the state pays and later seizes the money from you. Probably you'll get a fine, too. Never ever is anybody being imprisoned for these kinds of things. Sometimes it feels that the US or, at least, some of it's states are strange, medieval kind of places.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:20 PM
5

why would an independent business refuse to take your money? Sounds far-fetched.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 03:56 PM
1

School is the place which levels the playing field. Or should be. Almost nobody cares that the education system favors girls. And this is just one example. Because we tend to think that girls and women should helped because they are worse off. But that's not true. Take almost any statistic measuring the quality of life or well being and you'll find that it's men who are on average worse off. And the gap is going to widen as long as people don't know this -- or are too afraid of feminists, femini…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:25 AM
2

I don't know why, but for some reason, they are working to create an echo chamber over there. That's because the feminist narrative collapses if you let people confront it with facts. In addition feminists fall off their high horse if people are allowed to ask them about moral issues. Propagandist hate movements all have the same problems.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 08:14 AM
21

They are mostly for athletes and minorities but not all of them. At first it seems surprising that those haven't been attacked by feminists. But that would be an indirect attack upon female scholarships as well. That's why.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:52 AM
1

Women outnumber men in colleges even those western countries where scholarships play no or only a tiny role. So, they don't explain the gap although the article assumes they do.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:45 AM
2

When you, as a male, try to raise money for your startup have at least one woman along. Better still if she makes the pitch or part of it. Your chances of getting money will be significantly better. (Advice from a speaker at a conference I attended.)
/r/MensRights28/02/16 07:23 AM
2

I wonder if it's a universal thing that men, after they move together with a woman, can't listen to the music they used to and the way they used to listen. Several men I've talked about this over the years have shared the experience. Playing guitar and singing seems en even bigger no-no after a while (even i that's one thing the woman fell in love to begin with). I know cases when this was on of the reasons behind the divorce. I think that controlling music - for those men who have experienced t…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 07:12 AM
3

Out of seven services they provide three are denied to men. Out of one charity targeted at men there must about 50 targeted at women, so, perhaps that's not that bad. /s
/r/MensRights28/02/16 06:21 AM
1

Women try to commit suicide far more often. So the male suicides can be made to look like a pretty insignificant anomaly (even if it's not). A holistic and analytic approach could be to first list the things that make a good life and then explain how women are better off in every aspect. Then go on to discuss why societies produce so much better lives to women. One important sociological reason is that the worse-off sex (men) is better off in the eyes of the society. The issues you mentioned can…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:42 AM
1

Where I live a rape without violence (beating, strangling and stuff) gets you on average two years. A first timer sits usually half of it. I don't know what's right but 10 years sounds insane (particularly if the accused happens to be innocent as he sometimes if not often is). I can't understand these convictions that make raping almost as bad as killing. Where do they come from?
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:14 AM
1

They lost their control of who had access to information, and what information we could access. Who are "they" and how did they control access to information? I hope you're not talking about feminists somehow controlling media, public libraries etc. But what's true is that before the internet fact checking was a lot more difficult. So, movements, like feminism that are based mostly on lies, were doing better. Now they have to rethink their strategy: where to find people who are ignorant, fear to…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:18 PM
1

My country's missing. I guess it's not the only one.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:52 AM
1

Discrimination is not oppression. Men are discriminated against in many ways but, as a class, not oppressed. Women, on the other hand, are, as a class, oppressed in certain cultures. Beating disobedient wives, for example, can be a culturally accepted norm (wives beating husbands in western cultures can sometimes seem like it was culturally accepted but it's not).
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:29 AM
1

You are entitled to your opinion. But the fact remains that women tend to rate they feeling of well-being or happiness higher than men even in countries where their quality of life isn't necessarily better compared to men. Where that comes from or what it "means", well, there are many possible explanations. One is that they are somehow happier. Personally I think happiness is best studied by associating it with resilience. Perhaps women have more of that, too, because of the better social networ…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:40 AM
1

A Gallup employee told me that it's a well-known fact. But you can google for it! Try happiness women. Women rate themselves happier even if the gap to men has been diminishing. Very happy people are significantly more often women than men.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 06:13 PM
2

If you woke up as a girl your quality of life would probably rise over time because, well, women tend to have a better quality of life, objectively. But you'd have to pay a price, put on makeup, for example, to get treated (even) better. Then again you you could feel worse because women, and girls in particular, suffer more from anxieties (on the other hand, women all over the world tend to be happier than men). Perhaps your thinking would change. You'd be more interested in people and less inte…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 08:23 AM
1

No company ever would promise any such thing (or perhaps a body guard company?). But they've got all kinds of responsibilities the users have to follow - and in this case quite a few of them have been broken. You could, of course ask if Twitter breaks any laws if it lets the threats etc remain after they have learned about them. But they won't??? Any accounts and related accounts engaging in the activities specified below may be temporarily locked and/or subject to permanent suspension. Violent …
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:25 AM
1

That's becoming their next defense line now that lying about the total figures doesn't work the way it did for decades (thanks, internet). That means that they are starting to talk about those who enjoy inflicting pain or go crazy: psychopaths and psychotic persons. So the narrative is going to be: all men are at heart similar to Ted Bundy. Of course they aren't going to say it like that but it's the connotation when you stop talking about (almost) normal people in (almost) normal relationships.…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 05:49 AM
3

Where on earth do you live? You apparently study classical music on a level that has made you thing about the most prestigious orchestras on earth. At the same time in your country some "coastguard guys" act like thugs -- or the manpigs feminist fantasize about
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:32 AM
2

"Female branches" tend to discriminate against men more than "male branches" against women. A good starting point when studying feminism is to assume that everything they say is in reality the other way around or at least hugely exaggerated. That's not always the case but more often than not. If the job is very rough it means that most or all your co-workers are going to be men. My advice is to give up feminism: you can't trust your co-workers if you thing about men the way most feminists do.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 10:12 AM
2

Even the economist ... sad.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:09 PM
2

Yes, but why do lesbians work longer hours, why are they more work orientated? Simply because they don't dream of a less work orientated life as often as those women who can count on men to take care of working longer hours for them.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 05:08 PM
6

Reasonable feminists are marginal feminists (although the are in majority, I guess).
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:56 PM
1

It has only been 100 years or so, in the "western world" where people have not been considered ready and eligible for sexual activity and marriage before late teens. In Europe the age of consent is 14-16. Only in Ireland it's 17.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 05:50 PM
2

Ask how girls and boys are involved in running the place. It's not uncommon (here where I live) that girls help by doing all kinds of tasks the employees ask them to do. Boys not so much. In my opinion this is the first time when boys start to feel that school is a place for girls and female teachers, not for them. When I asked about this I was told that it's too hard and time consuming to involve boys. I just had to accept the answer -- it makes sense in a way -- but ... how hard have they trie…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 04:07 PM
9

What possible alternative is there...? There are at several alternatives. For example, in primitive cultures as well as in families etc people just gather around an decide what's right blood feuds are the normal way to see that the justice is done outside centralized states sharia is an example of a religious law some aspects of life are ruled by international laws private courts have been used in ships or other places where no-one else has the monopoly of legal violence
/r/MensRights20/02/16 03:04 PM
4

The irony of a company that is overwhelmingly male being targeted for gender discrimination against men is not lost on Joelle Emerson, a former women’s rights employment lawyer whose startup Paradigm works with tech companies to improve the diversity of their workforces. The irony that Joella Emerson doesn't have a clue is not lost on me. Of course discrimination happens when firms are driven to favor women because people like Joelle Emerson otherwise sue them. If Yahoo's bosses were already mos…
/r/MensRights20/02/16 07:07 AM
1

I don't think chivalry has much to do with it. At least, it's not the root cause. Amazingly, many historians attribute the birth of romantic love to chivalry, as if it didn't exist earlier or in those parts of the world where chivalry was not known. I'm almost certain that favoring women in courts is also a more universal thing, that it existed before chivalry and outside western Europe. I honestly think that people, and men in particular, find it very hard to treat cute -- and thus childlike --…
/r/MensRights16/02/16 05:56 AM
2

I wonder when the BBC and other "journalists" will find out that women are on average taller than men.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:17 PM
3

In other words, the 20% aren't the same people in every situation. You might belong to the 80% at school and yet be in the 20% elsewhere, like while playing guitar in a band at a club.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:32 AM
4

I think he failed to see that he himself lives in a culture that is based on monogamy. That proves pretty strongly that societies aren't necessarily manifestations of biological urges as he claims them to be. Both powerful men and many women would perhaps become polygamous (and I'm afraid that's going to happen) if they were given the freedom. But fortunately there were other historical forces that decided otherwise. (In short, individualism since the Hellenic period as a way to rule over clans …
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:28 AM
2

Downton Abbey was created by a guy who was born in the 1940s. If you read books from, say, the 19th century you'll notice that the women didn't control dating the same way as they do today. The whole game was much more formal and for women it was very important to get married. If they didn't, there was a chance that nobody took care of them financially. Nowadays women work and the state promises to care of the poor so the rules have changed dramatically. In poorer parts of the world not much hav…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 08:17 AM
1

"The Atlantic has reported that a study recently published in Gender and Society shows that, in Canada, partnered gay men earn 5% less than straight men with partners. On the flip side, lesbian women with partners earn about 8% more than coupled straight women."
/r/MensRights15/02/16 05:38 AM
4

In Mythbusters female audiences were asked to rank men's attractiveness. When the men were given well-paying job titles women ranked them higher. Then I realized that the earning gap is women's "fault". And that's why, I suppose, gay men earn less than heteros.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 04:54 PM
2

Employers favor women: http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/liberty-justice/markets-like-women-too/ The better-off gender must be made even more better off.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:58 AM
2

Feminism is based on lies. If it wasn't, there would be no feminism.
/r/MensRights14/02/16 07:47 AM
1

I think this is a pretty good test: your kid, would you want to have her/him to be born as a male or female?
/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter