~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Today I had to explain to my 11yo son that people think hitting a girl is much much worse than hitting a boy. :(Or developing one's skills at inflicting permanent psychological damage with verbal abuse. Can't get into trouble doing that. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/09 01:41 PM |
| 1 | Are all MensRights advocates politically right-wing?I think my first anti-feminist thoughts came when I saw feminists and Christian conservatives lining up on the same side against pornography. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/09 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Are all MensRights advocates politically right-wing?Interesting paradox. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/09 10:57 PM |
| 2 | Are all MensRights advocates politically right-wing?I was going to ask a similar question, so I know where you're coming from. There does seem to be a reactionary element within the movement that yearns for the good old days of barefoot and pregnant women. But I am a MR sympathizer and as left as you can get. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/09 03:23 PM |
| 2 | "If the act of procreation were neither the outcome of a desire nor accompanied by feelings of pleasure, but a matter to be decided on the basis of purely rational considerations, is it likely the human race would still exist?""What do you get when you kiss a girl You get enough germs to catch pneumonia After you do, she'll never phone you I'll never fall in love again " --Burt Bacharach | /r/MensRights | 06/11/09 04:14 PM |
| 2 | Just thought of perhaps the central double-standard behind feminism ...More to the point, the same factors that drive men to becoming CEOs are the same factors that cause them to commit more crimes. In fact, the distinction between the two is ambiguous at best. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/09 05:49 PM |
| 1 | Just thought of perhaps the central double-standard behind feminism ...As an individual, I lack the resources to conduct statistically meaningful polls. However, I can make assumptions based on my personal observations; and one of these observations is that I've never heard any discussion suggesting that gender inequity in prison populations is a problem that needs to be addressed. There is no 'affirmative action' for reducing what statistics would indicate is an enormous bias in the incarceration of males. | /r/MensRights | 27/10/09 05:40 PM |
| 28 | Just thought of perhaps the central double-standard behind feminism ...I'm starting to think that a majority of 'feminists' are simply female supremacists, and should be honest enough to call themselves so. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/09 04:45 PM |
| 1 | Has anyone ever proposed a sperm strike, either as a means of political protest or as an economic tool (no pun intended) to raise the prices offered by sperm banks?Just Googled the term and found this, but they don't seem to be proposing the actual withholding of sperm. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/09 10:25 PM |
| 3 | I grasp that, technically, the plan criminalizes all male participants in heterosexual sex... Wait, what?!Maybe not. But it just occurred to me that no one else espousing, or even just believing, such a hate-filled ideology could advance within mainstream society as easily as a radical feminist. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/09 01:26 PM |
| 1 | I grasp that, technically, the plan criminalizes all male participants in heterosexual sex... Wait, what?!Wait, it's satire? Are you sure? I'd scan the rest of the blog myself for evidence one way or the other, but reading it made me so sick I don't want to go back there. | /r/MensRights | 09/10/09 01:20 PM |
| 2 | "Male privilege" is an article on Wikipedia. There was one on "female privilege", but they deleted it citing "lack of context"Tell Glenn Sacks. | /r/MensRights | 27/06/09 02:37 PM |
| 0 | Is this woman capable of writing an essay on ANY subject without referring to her gender? Can you imagine the response if a male wrote like this?I think the use of parenthesis and the words 'but we won't get into that' provide textual evidence that even in her mind her mention prostitutes wasn't as casual as her mention of salted meats. And if you read her column regularly the pattern of such gratuitous sexual references becomes unambiguous. I don't know who Tom Leykis is, but from what you wrote of him, I wouldn't be interested in hearing his shows. I doubt he has a regular political column in the NYT op-ed section or any platform of co… | /r/MensRights | 12/04/09 03:31 PM |
| 1 | Is this woman capable of writing an essay on ANY subject without referring to her gender? Can you imagine the response if a male wrote like this?The question was why she chose to insert the reference to 'shady ladies' and 'soiled doves' in the first place in an article about gold panning in the recession. It was totally gratuitous. As to making a career out of being manly, as far as writers or journalists are concerned, I can't think of any prominent contemporary examples unless they're engaged in self-parody--and that's what you'd get if you could somehow transpose genders in Dowd's essays: self-parody. This illustrates my whole point. … | /r/MensRights | 10/04/09 04:47 PM |
| 2 | Is this woman capable of writing an essay on ANY subject without referring to her gender? Can you imagine the response if a male wrote like this?I find the innumerable references to women's fashion strewn throughout her essays as a deliberate attempt to express what she considers the "feminine" point of view (or more specifically, the rich white feminine POV). I think her popularity is mainly due to the subtle titillation she arouses with her incessant references to her sexuality. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/09 04:17 PM |
| 2 | Is this woman capable of writing an essay on ANY subject without referring to her gender? Can you imagine the response if a male wrote like this?What does whoring have to do with the article? Why mention it? It seems like every sentence she writes is implicitly prefaced by the words, "Speaking as someone with a vagina..." | /r/MensRights | 10/04/09 04:03 PM |
| 1 | Is this woman capable of writing an essay on ANY subject without referring to her gender? Can you imagine the response if a male wrote like this?Links to all her recent columns are right on the page. Besides, she's well-known enough that plenty of people would recognize the validity of my allegation just by searching their memories. If you want a couple of specific examples, in "Striking it Poor", her essay about the recent, recession-inspired resurgence of gold prospecting and first-hand account of a day-trip she went on panning for gold, she (for no apparent reason) included the following: The 49ers — who Mark Twain described as “a wil… | /r/MensRights | 10/04/09 03:37 PM |
| 2 | A girl aged 17 has sex with a 14 yr old and is charged with a misdemeanor. A boy aged 17 has sex with a 14 yr old and is charged with a felony. Both are charged within 48 hours of eachother in the same city.Any radical feminists have any comments on this? | /r/MensRights | 24/03/09 01:47 PM |
| 1 | Why don't feminists try to encourage women to take jobs in mining, logging or construction, all of which are heavily male dominated?Since there are only two genders, I don't see much logic in calling oneself a feminist and a masculinist. Why not just ignore gender (except in the bedroom)? If you must use an 'ism', how about 'anti-sexism'? | /r/MensRights | 04/03/09 03:24 PM |
| 1 | Why don't feminists try to encourage women to take jobs in mining, logging or construction, all of which are heavily male dominated?None of those adjectives have anything to do with gender. The only context in which masculinity or femininity are desirable is sexual. Indeed, we maintain the stereotypes specifically to appeal to the opposite gender so as to get laid. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/09 03:19 PM |
| 1 | Why don't feminists try to encourage women to take jobs in mining, logging or construction, all of which are heavily male dominated?Think of the stereotypes involved for either gender and I think you'll understand. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/09 03:55 PM |
| 0 | Why don't feminists try to encourage women to take jobs in mining, logging or construction, all of which are heavily male dominated?Well, I still find the idea of defining myself or taking pride in my gender or its supposed inherent characteristics to be embarrassing. Quien es mas macho? Quien es mas femenino? Both stupid. Making a political ideology out of gender--even stupider. If indeed there are masculinists (and feminists) who see themselves as primarily combating traditional gender roles, they might want to think about a name change. | /r/MensRights | 02/03/09 06:20 AM |
| 5 | Why don't feminists try to encourage women to take jobs in mining, logging or construction, all of which are heavily male dominated?Just as an aside, if, as a man, I went around calling myself a 'masculinist,' I would sound like a bit of an asshole, wouldn't I? I don't understand why women aren't equally embarrassed to call themselves 'feminists.' | /r/MensRights | 01/03/09 07:46 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter