TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

toss1122 Archive

View 0 posts and 34 comments by toss1122 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
73

decision is giving the child to a child-rapist. This is the core problem. This should not happen. That baby should be placed into the system for adoption (unless the parents of the guy wanted to be guardian until their son was 18). That would be equality. A raped woman can keep the baby, so a raped man can keep the baby. A male that raped doesn't get parental rights, a woman that raped shouldn't get parental rights. If the baby was adopted that would end parental rights and responsibilities. Let…
/r/MensRights10/11/21 11:14 PM
2

why don't companies fire all the men and just hire women? They do. That is why certain fields still are majority female. Nursing: Males are making fast progress into the field, as pay is above average and "emotional" rationale no longer keeps men out of the field. Sort of a reverse example. Journalism: Newspapers/magazines were run and controlled by men. Today they are mostly women, especially magazines. But notice how the pay has fallen. TV Newscasters: Same as newspapers. School administrators…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 09:31 PM
3

Let each family decide for themselves. Unfortunately that doesn't seem to work as people in marriage/relationship use emotional leverage to prevent the testing and commit fraud. It would be like the IRS saying, just pay your taxes, we trust you. Let the people decide if they want an audit. Then add there has been no penalty to women for committing the fraud and that is why I think you can't let people choose. Otherwise why? How many men love those kids despite finding out later they were not blo…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 09:06 PM
4

I'm not trying to prove anyone wrong. Honestly, with DNA testing so cheap, I think that both parents and child should have to go to an appointment 1 week after birth to all be DNA tested and the birth certificate is then signed/parents declared based upon that. The consequences of raising a child that isn't yours are unimaginable for both the parent(s) and child. $500 in testing seems cheap as a cost to get that birth certificate correct. People invest 18+++ years into raising a child, the emoti…
/r/MensRights23/10/21 03:15 PM
6

Lots of Blah, blah, blah that ignored this: The French Council of State upheld the law on May 6th, saying it did not want “to upset the French regime of filiation” Their own government says it is to prevent upsetting the status quo of filiation: the fact of being or of being designated the child of a particular parent or parents.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 02:58 PM
58

France for 1: Paternity tests were banned in France 15 years ago. If French customs intercept DNA samples or results in the mail, the perpetrators in theory risk up to a year in prison and a €15,000 fine. The French Council of State upheld the law on May 6th, saying it did not want “to upset the French regime of filiation” Source: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/french-men-s-insecurity-over-paternity-of-offspring-creating-a-society-of-doubt-1.773569 Other countries put huge limits on them: https…
/r/MensRights22/10/21 10:22 PM
5

Genetics. Sorry, just watch kids develop from 6 months to 5 years old and you can see the genetic effects that boys and girls aren't the same. Sorry, no puberty or hormones yet and society can only do so much influence. Way more about nature than nuture.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 09:39 PM
1

Also I disagree with the notion that private entities that are open to public can trample the Constitution just because they are "private" (yet access to the general public is fully open) I disagree here. What is next, forcing me to grow a beard? Forcing my business to serve someone that hasn't bathed in 90 days and will damage my property with their filth. Every private company violates the constitution, Reddit isn't free speech, per you logic companies could have no rules beyond the law. That …
/r/MensRights20/09/21 04:15 PM
1

In a university you don't have to wear a respirator. Yes, some graduate students do, they have labs that require it. Also, the maintenance guy that services the chillers has to wear one, along with all the medical people at the teaching hospital, etc. Yes, and some workplaces ban long hair, so? So, this is a private school, so why is it news that a private entity bans certain appearances that everyone can conform to (i.e. not legal discrimination).
/r/MensRights20/09/21 03:01 PM
1

So the article is about a private school and honestly I think the parents/administration are preparing boys to be men with such a policy. Just like how prep schools make the boys wear ties, to get them comfortable/used to wearing a tie everyday, as that is the corporate dress code of high paid workers. Policy at schools never will have logic. It is about preparing people for the future. Preparing boys to accept that as men a significant number of jobs won't allow beards is an important lesson, a…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 09:08 PM
13

Very few and archaic workplaces ban beards Where are you looking, I know of TONS of work places with beard bans. Rochette Shell/Exxon/EVERY refinery and probably most off-shore rigs. Respirators don't work with beards. Do you want to have your beard to die. Pharmaceutical/Medical - Anyone that has to wear a respirator or breathing air. Again, do you want to die or kill your patient? Food Plants Nowhere near a 1950s policy, all very legitimate reasons and current policies. Edit: Some more: Machin…
/r/MensRights18/09/21 10:35 PM
2

I didn’t see any apparent bias from the officers I do. Any male that got in a fight with his girlfriend and broke her skin where she had active wounds would never be released, they always end up in cuffs and a night in jail. Honestly, that you watched the whole video and don't see that is amazing. They literally mute the conversation when the cop decides to not issue even a citation for the DV, all while they say it is simply because HE is bigger, thus it can't apply. All after telling him earli…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 08:02 PM
2

I can't think of another single explanation for his behavior. I can. Watch the video the cops all but recommend they get divorced and Brian calls her crazy at one point. Assume she had another manic episode but runs off with another person leaving him abandoned with the van. Say he waits 1-2 days and then says screw it I want to be home. He returns home. He and his family figure all their texts are manipulative of whatever emotional drama she is creating. Then surprise she is reported missing by…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 06:45 PM
2

But she didn't just put Brian in danger, her actions while he was driving caused him to cross the double yellow line and hit a curb. How would you feel if yourself or family was injured due to her inability to control herself when simply getting pulled over for a non-charge health check by a police officer.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 06:32 PM
2

Who knows maybe he did kill her Any maybe if the cop had done his job and not convinced himself out of DV charges as she clearly can't be a threat to Brian (even as he stood there with visible injuries, enough to consider calling an ambulance to protect themselves from liability). She would be alive as she would have been in prison and her parents may have told her to return home and seek the help she needs, since they clearly didn't have bail money as they couldn't even come up with $100 for a …
/r/MensRights17/09/21 06:30 PM
4

then the man can decide independently before it's birth whether he wants to support it or not No, women can hide the pregnancy. Men need to be given a documented notice by any woman and then have X weeks to opt out.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:34 PM
2

while with men's products they try to make us feel like shit and think their product is the only way to be normal. Women make 80% of the purchasing decisions and spend 80% (or more) of the discretionary income). The Ad you are complaining about isn't design to toward men, but toward women. A significant percentage of men don't care and buy the cheapest products. Go to a store like Fleet Farm and you see this, far less selection, but better value products.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:32 PM
1

Marriage is the combining of two people into one for legal purposes. Just like these women don't have to testify against their husbands for all the laws they broke, the contract was for life, so breaking it has high costs. Bezos - don't care. Long enough marriage, she has been very professional on exit. Melinda - Deserves nothing. Once she wrote a book and started tarnishing his name, she deserves nothing. Seriously, having lived most of your married life as the wealthiest couple in the world an…
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:19 PM
3

Oprah is the only one I can truly think of. She came from poverty and I have yet to find evidence of the contrary. The rest just like to re-write history and act like they are self made, but really came from wealth.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:15 PM
1

People would be outraged https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer Nope, since you don't ever see this in the news. Just a guy wanting money.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 10:52 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Killer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_controversial_album_art A bit overstated. Lots of exploitation of women/girls in this list and Virgin Killer is just straight up porn/pedophilia as that is a sexual pose.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 10:51 PM
1

We already have those "added" parts. Men used to have to wear fully body bathing suits for beaches/mixed swimming. Men just don't care and thus don't hide their body parts. Men have pec's, nipples, etc. All of which are very sexual, just go check out all the products sold to men related to those (i.e. nipple rings).
/r/MensRights25/08/21 10:49 PM
1

Would females be more attracted to males? No. Nature shows us that females select the best mate based on survival of the fittest. All courtship in nature is based on this. The best males (healthiest) will have the most colorful feathers, etc. The sexual genitalia aren't a focus of the female. Males have evolved to spread their seed, in order to do so they focus on where that seed needs spread, because honestly those that didn't, didn't pass their genes on.
/r/MensRights25/08/21 10:47 PM
1

Wow, you have lots of anger and are completely taking my statement out of context and not at all as intended. But honestly, here is your evidence that you wont' believe anyway: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2779915 Sex Discrimination and Admission to Medical School, 1929-1984 So please tell me in history when Women were discriminated against and expected to marry, raise a family and be sub servant to their husband (Oh, that existed in history, just read the bible). I hate feminist, but denying th…
/r/MensRights25/08/21 03:03 PM
1

While not formally written as a not allowed, and while you can find examples, for the vast majority of women, they were told they are not allowed to go to medical school and most schools didn't admit them. So I get your point, but from a societal level, women really didn't get equality in schooling/work world until probably the 1970s. Now you can say that wasn't because of men, but pressure from other women. Because honestly, in my life I have seen women (via their husbands) causing the problem,…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 03:24 PM
9

That is easy, same reason after 40 years of affirmative action we are more racist than before. At 18 men have to sign up for Selective Service (legal discrimination against men, women are not required). Legal to post scholarships where you can only apply if black, Hispanic, Asian, women, etc. Illegal to post scholarship where you can only apply if white, male. Now this was at least somewhat fair when it said we had to go from the 1950s (women not allowed to go to medical school) to today. But no…
/r/MensRights23/08/21 04:37 PM
1

about Mike Richards choosing himself 100% this, the whole design, order of the "guest" hosts, etc. was all about making it look like he was the best person, so they actually picked people to make him look good. The had to use Ken first as viewers needed a respectable face that Alex would have supported. Nobody was surprised by the announcement, the only surprise was that their internal polling showed they had to keep coming up with guest hosts as nobody wants Richards. Glad the fans saw through …
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:03 PM
1

Per your believe that means I'm still part of my mothers body.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:48 PM
1

The law I'm suggesting never limits what the women can do with her body. Did you read my comment?
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:48 PM
1

NO, each women can't have a different date that makes the cells a baby. Just like each driver on the road can't have a different speed limit. To have equality in law and society everyone has to agree to a common point so liability can be determined and even criminal law (i.e. did that drunk driver commit homicide as the baby died). I don't care if that is at day 0 or at 9 months. But there has to be a clear definition of when it becomes a baby and gets rights. clearly the decision should be hers…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:43 PM
1

So Canada is again hypocritical. For the MAN the child is conceived at him sending his sperm out. For a Woman she can flexibly determine based on her emotions of the day when it becomes a Baby. For both child fiscal responsibility and legal liability. Seems like bad laws.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:53 PM
1

You can only go to 23 weeks. Some states per this source say 28 weeks (https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/what-states-allow-late-term-abortion). Also, from a purely legal debate standpoint, that same source says many states don't define fetus viability and there is no universal federal law definition. Then go to medical journals and equally no universally agreed definition. But this all is irrelevant as that wasn't the point of the post and doesn't matter if laws were updated to th…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 02:46 PM
1

This is of course a religious view and while I believe in freedom of religion I also believe in separation of church and state. Religious doctrine should not drive law in my opinion. But it is also a scientific view, from a genetic standpoint the cells are unique and don't even have to be from the mother. Take horse breeding, the take an egg from the best mare and sperm for the best stallion, fertilize the egg. Then they implant that egg into a "trash" male (any surrogate) to culture the egg and…
/r/MensRights15/08/21 02:45 PM
6

I think of it similar to our defense laws, if you are touching me, I can use force (up to death) as I have a right over my body that trumps all your rights of life, I won't go to prison for murder (proven with assaults where the victim protects them-self). Now take the women, she has a right to abort at anytime, even up to month 9. Her rights overrule those of the fetus/baby. The Dr. is the one that is the murder if the baby can survive once outside the womb. Obviously for a 2 month abortion, th…
/r/MensRights14/08/21 10:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter