| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Getting Lawyer Involved For “Are we dating the same guy Chicago?”but I need people to give me educated responses so I can get moving in the right direction. THEN CALL A LAWYER - STOP PLAYING VICTIM ON REDDIT. GOOGLE LAWYERS IN IL OR CALL THE IL BAR FOR A RECOMMENDATION. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/23 07:01 PM |
| 1 | Getting Lawyer Involved For “Are we dating the same guy Chicago?”I guess the question is what do you do then? Nothing. Stop playing their game and move on in your life. Go MGTOW. That is the only way. I don't date. I'm not on that site and won't be as they don't even notice me walking down the road. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/23 06:53 PM |
| 1 | Getting Lawyer Involved For “Are we dating the same guy Chicago?”Oh, your the OP. Well if I'm so wrong and horrible, then call a lawyer. They won't take your case. Even if you pay them $10K they won't. Maybe if you have $1M to put up, but anything less and they will ghost you. | /r/MensRights | 23/03/23 06:50 PM |
| 1 | Getting Lawyer Involved For “Are we dating the same guy Chicago?”If you have any more questions toss2222 let me know. Can you please DM me your bar license? | /r/MensRights | 23/03/23 06:48 PM |
| 1 | Getting Lawyer Involved For “Are we dating the same guy Chicago?”Has anyone taken this to a lawyer with the case of defamation? Hardly no lawyer will take. The costs to litigate will be far more than you can recover from the defendants. You can win a huge judgement, but never collect as these woman likely are all broke. They are blatantly breaking the law in a public forum which is insane. No they are not. 95% of the posts are legal (obviously I can't see them). But you are allowed to post any "truth" you believe. Defamation in the USA is really hard to prove… | /r/MensRights | 23/03/23 04:30 PM |
| 1 | ChatGPT out here straight up lyingbecause it can find actual sources that backed by real research How? I have health problems and in PubMed I can find peer review articles that contradict each other. If I can't determine what sources are valid/false how will AI? Any determination will be based on either metrics that can be learned/controlled (think SEO on google for how scams keep making it to the top results) or will require a committee that directs the AI to only look at certain sources (i.e. biased). Can it give an example? I… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/23 07:29 PM |
| 1 | ChatGPT out here straight up lyingTo be fair chatgpt is still learning and nowhere near perfect yet. It won't ever get perfect. There is no such thing as AI, the underlying programming is still 0 or 1. It will only ever be what someone programmed. Current "AI" will only be as good or biased as the sources the underlying code analyzes. Really no different than real life. Take a person from Saudi Arabia, they will parrot the "group" narrative there no matter how much education they have. Move them to the USA and instantly the narr… | /r/MensRights | 21/03/23 06:46 PM |
| 1 | Creator of "Are We Dating the Same Guy" now has a GoFundMe campaign well on its way to the goal of $50,000. Scam or no?Well if they put it in the right off-shore servers and incorporate in the right country your suits will result in huge judgments that are never collectible. That is how the pirate sites continue to this day. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/23 06:32 PM |
| 1 | It has been illegal to pay women less for the same job since 1963. If it is so prevalent why aren’t more people fined, sued and companies shut down.But I do see a lot of guys criticizing women as being lazy for taking white collar jobs instead of physical labor. Because women keep saying they only earn 77 or 88 cents to the dollar that the men are earning. When they stop saying that, then men will stop calling them lazy. It seems to me those women are just being realistic about their capabilities and utilizing their strengths. Great, but then they can't complain about earning less. I don't complain (require laws) that the Hooters waitress m… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 09:25 PM |
| 1 | It has been illegal to pay women less for the same job since 1963. If it is so prevalent why aren’t more people fined, sued and companies shut down.Are you sure it wasn't that they just couldn't do it? Actually at all the plants only about 10-20% of either sex could do it after age 30-35. That was why the union plant was set up to use seniority to get you out of that position as you aged. Slowing production lines down wasn't uncommon during breaks (when the older operator filled in) or if someone was sick and the older employees had to fill in. There's a reason I picked a job where the heaviest thing I lift is a laptop. So why should someon… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 07:31 PM |
| 1 | It has been illegal to pay women less for the same job since 1963. If it is so prevalent why aren’t more people fined, sued and companies shut down.It is also why you see certain places "turn" almost female over a couple of years. For example, I worked at one company that had small food plants all over the mid-west. Union plants tended to be all men (higher pay) and non-union plants for all women. All the plants dated back to the 1930's (family businesses that got bought out through time). Basically, when corporations can pay less, they do (greed drives everything). Since women are willing to take less, I can tell you exactly what types of … | /r/MensRights | 18/03/23 06:35 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter