TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

toss5511 Archive

View 0 posts and 9 comments by toss5511 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I wouldn't judge so easily that the benefit doesn't outweigh the risks. I'm not. I stated that many Dr's don't even offer it because they, based on studies, feel the risk doesn't outweigh the benefit. That can also be the reason we don't see insurance covering the procedure. Equally, it in no way indicates any result for a single individual (positive or negative), simply results based on a large group. Also, don't fall into the debate of comparing men vs women medical procedures. If we feel men …
/r/MensRights29/09/22 09:09 PM
1

There are huge risks to any implant (body rejection) and sorry, many Dr. would see the need to fill a testicle with one as against their oath. The risk doesn't outweigh the benefit as I have yet to see any man in public that I would be able to tell they are missing a testicle. Not sure if I would even notice in a locker room. As for breasts, that could be a huge difference for women, especially if they started off with larger breasts.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:35 PM
1

And to be fair Needing a testicle implant vs breast is very different in the public. I don't know of a single guy that needs one or would be visible in daily public life. As for women, having zero boobs is likely noticeable in public and work. Let's not become that group that makes illogical arguments when there are so many things that are biased and better examples.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 06:34 PM
1

Don't forget women also live longer on men so collect more due to the life expectancy difference. Also, CEO/Professional women die at similar rates as men due to heart disease, but SAHM don't.
/r/MensRights25/09/22 07:51 PM
1

Do you know of a sample copy of this paperwork that can be viewed online without having to marry someone first? Every county has them available online. Here is one from Denver: https://countyfusion3.kofiletech.us/countyweb/disclaimer.do The paperwork in question that you are supposed to get from the courthouse tells you about alimony, co-ownership of properties, child support etc? Well the oath/vows of the officiant cover it: I, , take you, , for my lawful wife/husband, to have and to hold from …
/r/MensRights21/09/22 11:06 PM
1

If that really were the case, how does such preposterous law continue to exist? The same as any other contract. Marriage is a very powerful combining of 2 people into 1 entity. Including spousal privilege in criminal trials. It will continue to exist as long as people keep signing the contract (you have to go to the courthouse and get paperwork, that is you read, will tell you that you are agreeing to this). Nobody is forced to get married (well almost true as there is common law marriage).
/r/MensRights21/09/22 06:28 PM
1

Even in decent marriages it gets really bad. My mom was a SAHM, until the kids reached middle school. Dad's earnings were always the families. Her earnings were always hers. It made no sense. That new extra income allows us to get certain luxuries was great, but when she talked it was always her money (including in her checkbook that he wasn't joint on). But his checkbook/banks accounts all had to be joint. I get that they didn't want to share a checkbook (dad didn't like writing down the ledger…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:48 PM
1

I have never encountered such an organisation They exist, actually in very high numbers, but you can't "find" or get a list of them named. They will be companies with fewer than 50 employees and likely very "new". I would run into them all the time. Men start companies, company is all men and nothing woke until it gets to around 20 people, then everyone starts to worry they have to seem diverse or will get in trouble. By 50 employees, HR is required and lawyers inform you that if you don't becom…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 09:01 PM
1

As the author correctly states: “Women marry up, not down” Feminist defend this to the death as women should "know" their value. But I really wonder how the same group, saying the future is women, plans to do when they succeed. If Feminist succeed, women will be all the CEO's, presidents, etc. Who will they marry? Even if they aren't 100% successful and only achieve a 50% level (true real equity), then don't they realize there are now twice as many women competing for the smaller pool of high va…
/r/MensRights15/09/22 08:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter