TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

totallynotarobotnope Archive

View 3 posts and 39 comments by totallynotarobotnope on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Justice means the punishment should fit the crime. This is not Justice.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 03:21 AM
5

So hypocrisy is a live and well in politics? No news there.
/r/MGTOW11/05/17 03:48 PM
2

A prank that goes that far is called a crime. You can prank all you want but when you sexually brutalize a child by stripping them naked and posting a video of it, the only 'mercy' you deserve is a criminal record.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 01:21 AM
5

Must be, I don't get it at all
/r/MensRights06/05/17 02:52 AM
1

Thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 06:05 PM
1

So if he just sat there and did nothing while a drunk girl sucked his dick or sat on his cock, he's a rapist? If he knew she was too intoxicated to consent, yes, he is a rapist. Consent is based on sound judgement and grown ups understand that. The fact that you don't "believe it" is irrelevant. The law is the law and your belief one way or the other means nothing. Calling me names (ad hominem) is a sad attempt to bolster your weak thinking and failed argument. Pitiful and pathetic.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:29 AM
0

More logical fallacies and argument from ignorance. Perhaps you should go argue with the children and come back when you can actually reason.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 12:26 AM
1

It is a ridiculous non-starter to suggest that self intoxicates females should be treated like children. That's a false attribution. In fact, I stated that we already intervene when adults are drunk and it has been demonstrated in the courts that failure to intervene can result in liability. Because adults who self intoxicate, in so doing, assume responsibility for their subsequent self intoxicated actions. Another false analogy. Adults who self intoxicate do assume liability and I stated that a…
/r/MensRights28/04/17 05:53 PM
2

Incapacitated means a lot more than just drunk....If you make a conscious decision to self-intoxicate, then you are accountable for what you do. That isn't really the argument, though, is it? The argument is that if I self intoxicate, and you know I am intoxicated, you have a legal and moral obligation not to allow me to make bad decisions. More than one bar has been sued for allowing a patron to drive drunk. On the same basis, if you are intoxicated and try to initiate sex, my moral and legal o…
/r/MensRights28/04/17 01:44 PM
1

When you intentionally custom a place that provides sexual services for cash, you make that decision while sober. No judge would even consider such a case. r/quityourbullshit
/r/MensRights28/04/17 01:39 PM
3

I remember reading about three women who raped a cab driver last year in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. In 2014, Lara Stemple, Director of UCLA’s Health and Human Rights Law Project, came upon a statistic that surprised her: In incidents of sexual violence reported to the National Crime Victimization Survey, 38 percent of victims were men. She was vilified by feminists for reporting these facts.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 01:38 PM
3

While a person who consumed alcohol does assume a certain degree of risk, courts have already found that that risk is limited if safely or security is involved. We arrest drunk drivers. We don't permit incapacitated (by drugs or alcohol) to enter legal contracts, and if they do, courts have reversed them. So if a man or a woman intoxicated, we agree already that they are not capable of making certain kinds of choices. Sex, when a person is too drunk to consent, is simply being added to the list …
/r/MensRights28/04/17 04:15 AM
1

Wow. Scientists should be the most certain when it comes to this issue.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:51 PM
1

Germaine Greer, a well known feminist, makes the same argument about her vagina and that trans women are still men, but missing their penis.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:50 PM
5

But do you disagree the title is misleading as hell and somewhat rude to the general, more moderate trans population? It is a half truth, I agree.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 11:32 PM
2

If you actually thought about the article instead of just intellectually jacking off on this sub, you would have read how the group applauded the firing if a man who said 'ma'am' instead of the preferred he/she/it/female/male invented gender pronoun this person wanted. Nothing wrong with being trans, the argument is that there is he, she or a he/she transitioning into the opposite and fuck all the gender fluidity that is invented to create a pre tense of multiple genders. I believe that was the …
/r/MensRights20/03/17 09:50 PM
2

This is why 1) all rape claims should be investigated by the police prior to any action being taken by a college. And 2) false accusations should be a felony subject to the same period of time in prison as rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/17 04:13 AM
18

It seems to me that one of the biggest problems on Reddit isn't racist rednecks but some of the moderators. Even on r/the_donald i often see opposing points of view allowed but not on many other sites like politics and world news
/r/MensRights10/02/17 04:01 AM
0

Don't be droll. Let's assume the worst: that Trump is a pig. Even so, the author of this article is still correct: women in America are not oppressed. The fact they can argue that their new president is a male chauvinist pig and not be be beaten, shot, whipped, hung or whatever else they do to some women in other parts of the world is a testimony to equality of speech. By focussing your rebuttal on Trumps words you prove that you have bought into the feminist narrative that women in America are …
/r/MensRights27/01/17 04:19 AM
12

Now I want to punch all those masked assholes in the face.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/17 04:14 AM
0

Not until she fucking rips out some of her hair and wails. Then she is free to go.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/16 06:33 PM
45

That is why the right to sue those who take advantage of you must ever be removed from us. It is often the last recourse we have.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 04:28 PM
1

Try this one: http://www.nextions.com/wp-content/files_mf/142850844520150415ManterruptionsBropropriationandMansplaining2YPS.pdf Really interesting comments around conference calls suggest it isn't gender but context that matters more.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 02:55 AM
2

Oh, I am fully aware that modern feminism is in the hands of the crazies. Won't stop me from being one or believing in full equality but I won't identify with what a lot of people call feminism today.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 11:26 PM
1

Real feminists, like me ( I am a man but truly a feminist too) don't insult men or use buzzwords that are meant to insult. Its 'modern SJW' types that do.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:48 PM
-1

Yes, men do it more but the question is "why?" This blog (by a woman who is a communications blogger) does a nice job discussing this. http://www.marionspeaks.com/_blog/Marions_Communication_Tips/post/WHY_PEOPLE_INTERRUPT/
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:01 PM
0

That's actually very cleverly worded. If I hadn't read it carefully...
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:56 PM
9

You got to shut that shit down. 90% of so-called 'manspereading' happens because men try to get comfortable. Women don't have a sack between their legs and for some guys, its uncomfortable to put their legs tight together. There may even be medical things going on but the assumption is "he's just a fucking guy spreading his legs". Until you have some compassion for the problem some men face, STFU about it. If a guy is being an asshole, sure, call him on it, but don't assume the reason any more t…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:54 PM
3

That's hard. If you google "when a woman interrupts a man" 90% of what comes up is crap about how men interrupt women, etc. The most balanced blog I have seen on interruptions is this: http://www.marionspeaks.com/_blog/Marions_Communication_Tips/post/WHY_PEOPLE_INTERRUPT/ She points out there are lots of reasons why people interrupt. Assigning it to gender (ONE study said men do it more than women. They did NOT state 'why'. That's a useless piece of shit study but has been quoted by every dog an…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 08:50 PM
226

I like it. Manterrupting has a much merit as mansplaining, manspreading and all of the other mysandristic made up terms feminists love to use.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 03:15 PM
2

George Orwell would have loved the Truth Speak that feminists have created to support their anti-male rhetoric
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:58 PM
3

Calling for a ban on Bhurkas is the least a country should do. There is no legitimate reason in Islam for covering the face and the women who do can't pretend there is.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/11/16 05:32 PM
6

My point exactly. Calling the men wimps was out of line.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:26 PM
27

Really? The abstract I read said that the side effects were awful making the current version non-viable, yet many of the men wanted to keep using it anyway. Sounds like The Daily Show has their facts wrong.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 08:01 PM
1

The whole idea of the pussy pass is that women should receive preferential treatment - something women have fought to stop since the 1960s. You would think by now they would realize they have achieved equal treatment.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/16 03:31 AM
22

I have a 2016 Rolls Canardly. Rolls down one hill, can 'ardly get up the next.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/10/16 02:23 AM
2

I am guessing her father was a fucking white male who clearly didn't love her.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:43 AM
1

This movie should be rated NSFW because it sucked so hard.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:54 PM
0

Finally. As more judges realize there is no difference in statutory rape regardless of the genders of victim and perp, this travesty we see often see will turn to justice.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/09/16 02:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter